<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Colorado Democrats strangle Internet entrepreneurs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dasher</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-948688</link>
		<dc:creator>Dasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-948688</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On March 11th, 2010 at 10:10 am, pecze said:

I feel conflicted in this argument. I don’t like govt looking for new forms of revenue, but I think the current exemption gives online retailers an unfair advantage against local stores.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Online purchasers usually have to pay postage, which offsets the sales tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On March 11th, 2010 at 10:10 am, pecze said:</p>
<p>I feel conflicted in this argument. I don’t like govt looking for new forms of revenue, but I think the current exemption gives online retailers an unfair advantage against local stores.</p></blockquote>
<p>Online purchasers usually have to pay postage, which offsets the sales tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurthanson</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-923732</link>
		<dc:creator>kurthanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-923732</guid>
		<description>Colorado took a giant step to becoming the France of the Rockies - socialism in America&#039;s heartland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colorado took a giant step to becoming the France of the Rockies &#8211; socialism in America&#8217;s heartland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Palin to help send Internet Troll to Prison &#171; VotingFemale</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-903628</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Palin to help send Internet Troll to Prison &#171; VotingFemale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-903628</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin: Endless “Time for talk is over” tour hits Cleveland, Ohio on Monday  and  Colorado Democrats strangle Internet entrepreneurs and Readers of the day and  Who turned in “Jihad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin: Endless “Time for talk is over” tour hits Cleveland, Ohio on Monday  and  Colorado Democrats strangle Internet entrepreneurs and Readers of the day and  Who turned in “Jihad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-903090</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-903090</guid>
		<description>I will ALWAYS seek a &quot;no tax&quot; route if possible and legal. Anytime I can withhold my money from the long arms of gubmint I will happily do so. And that icludes the utter stupidity of giving them an interest free loan of my money, so I get a &quot;tax refund.&quot;

&lt;blockquote&gt; On March 11th, 2010 at 10:10 am, pecze said:
I feel conflicted in this argument. I don’t like govt looking for new forms of revenue, but I think the current exemption gives online retailers an unfair advantage against local stores.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nonsense. I buy a lot online because the prices - including shipping are mostly better, or the product I want is IN STOCK. I&#039;m tired of wasting gas, fighting traffic and stupid people going to stores that advertise items and then claim they are &quot;out of stock.&quot; Really? I get to a store on the day a sale is supposed to start, before the store opens, and they are &quot;out of stock&quot;? Rubbish. Just one reason (among many others) I no longer shop at Wal-Mart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will ALWAYS seek a &#8220;no tax&#8221; route if possible and legal. Anytime I can withhold my money from the long arms of gubmint I will happily do so. And that icludes the utter stupidity of giving them an interest free loan of my money, so I get a &#8220;tax refund.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p> On March 11th, 2010 at 10:10 am, pecze said:<br />
I feel conflicted in this argument. I don’t like govt looking for new forms of revenue, but I think the current exemption gives online retailers an unfair advantage against local stores.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Nonsense. I buy a lot online because the prices &#8211; including shipping are mostly better, or the product I want is IN STOCK. I&#8217;m tired of wasting gas, fighting traffic and stupid people going to stores that advertise items and then claim they are &#8220;out of stock.&#8221; Really? I get to a store on the day a sale is supposed to start, before the store opens, and they are &#8220;out of stock&#8221;? Rubbish. Just one reason (among many others) I no longer shop at Wal-Mart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPL 310</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-903041</link>
		<dc:creator>CPL 310</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-903041</guid>
		<description>Ayn Rand was right again.  They&#039;re killing Colorado.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ayn Rand was right again.  They&#8217;re killing Colorado.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 24Klady</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-902993</link>
		<dc:creator>24Klady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-902993</guid>
		<description>Years ago in CA I had a merchant friend tell me they regularly shipped items to out of state second homes after the POS.  As long as the customer had a valid address in another state they could ship it there and the customer didn&#039;t pay CA sales tax - as long as they didn&#039;t personally take possession of the merchandise when sold.  Whether that&#039;s true or not I&#039;ve no idea.  But, the shipment we discussed was a $30K fur coat!  The merchant actually drove it to NV and turned it over to the buyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago in CA I had a merchant friend tell me they regularly shipped items to out of state second homes after the POS.  As long as the customer had a valid address in another state they could ship it there and the customer didn&#8217;t pay CA sales tax &#8211; as long as they didn&#8217;t personally take possession of the merchandise when sold.  Whether that&#8217;s true or not I&#8217;ve no idea.  But, the shipment we discussed was a $30K fur coat!  The merchant actually drove it to NV and turned it over to the buyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NHMagenta</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-902960</link>
		<dc:creator>NHMagenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-902960</guid>
		<description>Folks I think we&#039;re going to see Congress within the next 1-3 years (a) take that 1992 US Supreme Court decision to heart and require all &quot;direct&quot; sellers to collect and remit sales taxes of the States they ship merchandise to (b) possibly &quot;to help small online retailers&quot; have a single interstate rate where the merchants will pay the IRS which in turn will dole out the funds and/or (c) a Federal excise tax on electronic commerce sales.

We could even see a return of the Federal excise tax on &quot;luxury&quot; items which was imposed between ca. 1942-1970</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks I think we&#8217;re going to see Congress within the next 1-3 years (a) take that 1992 US Supreme Court decision to heart and require all &#8220;direct&#8221; sellers to collect and remit sales taxes of the States they ship merchandise to (b) possibly &#8220;to help small online retailers&#8221; have a single interstate rate where the merchants will pay the IRS which in turn will dole out the funds and/or (c) a Federal excise tax on electronic commerce sales.</p>
<p>We could even see a return of the Federal excise tax on &#8220;luxury&#8221; items which was imposed between ca. 1942-1970</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjem24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-902941</link>
		<dc:creator>emjem24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-902941</guid>
		<description>That Colorado had the gall to create an &quot;internet tax&quot; shows how out of ideas and how greedy the state is when it comes to revenue. Hurt the little guy to keep their privileged a$$es in power. Not only are the affiliates charged this tax but it&#039;s passed on to the consumer and the consumer has to pay the tax as well. As a family that uses Amazon because it beats retail store prices in different categories of merchandise, my husband and I find this new revenue creator ill-thought out and ill-conceived. It will come back to bite Ritter (who&#039;ll be gone from office soon) and the legislature.

Coloradans on this blog won&#039;t like me for saying the following but it needs to be said. I was reluctant to come back to Colorado after my husband was reassigned to a local military installation in Colorado Springs. I found the state changed not only by the mismanagement of local, state, and federal politicians (both Dems and Repubs) but that the complexion of Colorado Springs had changed with the increased housing development sprawl. The lip service paid to military spouse employment still exists, which doesn&#039;t serve spouses well in a bad economy or in the previously booming economic period.

The economy sucks in Colorado. If you&#039;re a military spouse and want to work for one of the local military installations or contractors you need a basic clearance or someone who can sponsor it. There are not many people hiring unless you want to be another customer service representative drone in a call center.

While the environs of Colorado will always remind me of how beautiful the state is, the ugliness of greedy politicians and even businesses who want to tap the illegal alien underground market, and the increased population have made both my husband and I pause about plans for staying in this state after my husband retires from the military. The complexion of Colorado has changed from the influx of illegal aliens (I used to teach some of their kids I know they&#039;re here), and migration of liberals from other Western states and from the East Coast. Lip service is paid when it comes to fiscal responsibility, immigration, military-civilian relations, and conservatism.

I don&#039;t blame Colorado natives or conservatives for the current state of affairs. It also affects some of the other Western states like Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah. What a shame. I hope Colorado gets its pioneering spirit back along with the independent spirit that used to make it a great place to live and thrive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Colorado had the gall to create an &#8220;internet tax&#8221; shows how out of ideas and how greedy the state is when it comes to revenue. Hurt the little guy to keep their privileged a$$es in power. Not only are the affiliates charged this tax but it&#8217;s passed on to the consumer and the consumer has to pay the tax as well. As a family that uses Amazon because it beats retail store prices in different categories of merchandise, my husband and I find this new revenue creator ill-thought out and ill-conceived. It will come back to bite Ritter (who&#8217;ll be gone from office soon) and the legislature.</p>
<p>Coloradans on this blog won&#8217;t like me for saying the following but it needs to be said. I was reluctant to come back to Colorado after my husband was reassigned to a local military installation in Colorado Springs. I found the state changed not only by the mismanagement of local, state, and federal politicians (both Dems and Repubs) but that the complexion of Colorado Springs had changed with the increased housing development sprawl. The lip service paid to military spouse employment still exists, which doesn&#8217;t serve spouses well in a bad economy or in the previously booming economic period.</p>
<p>The economy sucks in Colorado. If you&#8217;re a military spouse and want to work for one of the local military installations or contractors you need a basic clearance or someone who can sponsor it. There are not many people hiring unless you want to be another customer service representative drone in a call center.</p>
<p>While the environs of Colorado will always remind me of how beautiful the state is, the ugliness of greedy politicians and even businesses who want to tap the illegal alien underground market, and the increased population have made both my husband and I pause about plans for staying in this state after my husband retires from the military. The complexion of Colorado has changed from the influx of illegal aliens (I used to teach some of their kids I know they&#8217;re here), and migration of liberals from other Western states and from the East Coast. Lip service is paid when it comes to fiscal responsibility, immigration, military-civilian relations, and conservatism.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t blame Colorado natives or conservatives for the current state of affairs. It also affects some of the other Western states like Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah. What a shame. I hope Colorado gets its pioneering spirit back along with the independent spirit that used to make it a great place to live and thrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustAThought</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-902907</link>
		<dc:creator>JustAThought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-902907</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 11th, 2010 at 10:44 am, Dexter Alarius said: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;…economically devastated government budgets need a shot of &lt;strike&gt;revenue&lt;/strike&gt;reality.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Welcome to the real world.
When your income goes down, you cut spending. Is it really that hard to understand?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Apparently, yes, it really is that hard to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 11th, 2010 at 10:44 am, Dexter Alarius said: </p>
<blockquote><p>…economically devastated government budgets need a shot of <strike>revenue</strike>reality.</p></blockquote>
<p>Welcome to the real world.<br />
When your income goes down, you cut spending. Is it really that hard to understand?</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently, yes, it really is that hard to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunshinerbray</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-902902</link>
		<dc:creator>sunshinerbray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-902902</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 11th, 2010 at 2:19 pm, docflash said: 

Take a look at chron.com the Houston Chronicle&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I believe this is the article you&#039;re referencing:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.chron.com/believeitornot/2010/03/texas_thomas_aquinas_to_replac_1.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+houstonchronicle%2Fbelieveitornot+(Believe+It+or+Not)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.chron.com/believeitornot/2010/03/texas_thomas_aquinas_to_replac_1.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+houstonchronicle%2Fbelieveitornot+(Believe+It+or+Not)&lt;/a&gt;

Still, it&#039;s not permanent. (yet)  Even if it were, Jefferson&#039;s political ideology is still covered in the 8th grade TEKS, which mean&#039;s he&#039;s not completely removed from the historical record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 11th, 2010 at 2:19 pm, docflash said: </p>
<p>Take a look at chron.com the Houston Chronicle</p></blockquote>
<p>I believe this is the article you&#8217;re referencing:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.chron.com/believeitornot/2010/03/texas_thomas_aquinas_to_replac_1.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+houstonchronicle%2Fbelieveitornot+(Believe+It+or+Not)" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.chron.com/believeitornot/2010/03/texas_thomas_aquinas_to_replac_1.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+houstonchronicle%2Fbelieveitornot+(Believe+It+or+Not)</a></p>
<p>Still, it&#8217;s not permanent. (yet)  Even if it were, Jefferson&#8217;s political ideology is still covered in the 8th grade TEKS, which mean&#8217;s he&#8217;s not completely removed from the historical record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 24Klady</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-902895</link>
		<dc:creator>24Klady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-902895</guid>
		<description>Somewhere in the back of my mind I keep thinking that if we demanded those in elected state and federal positions to submit a complete financial report to their constituents every year once elected to office we&#039;d see a complete turnaround on taxation.  Many come into office barely squeeking out a living, yet leave with millions in the bank.  They appear genius when managing their own money and completely incompetent at managing ours?  How do they do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhere in the back of my mind I keep thinking that if we demanded those in elected state and federal positions to submit a complete financial report to their constituents every year once elected to office we&#8217;d see a complete turnaround on taxation.  Many come into office barely squeeking out a living, yet leave with millions in the bank.  They appear genius when managing their own money and completely incompetent at managing ours?  How do they do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottyDog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-902882</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottyDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-902882</guid>
		<description>On line taxes will eventually just empower the public employee unions. Sales taxes and property taxes are their life blood for bribing state legislators and eventually controlling most of the legislation.

I Live in California and believe me this is what happens. In the local news we just did an audit of state jobs with a nurse working for the state making $250,000.00 in Overtime last year.

This is what happens with out of control taxes with public unions holding the taxpayers hostage to their ever increasing demands for more pay and benefits.

Increased taxes are the life blood of these leeches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On line taxes will eventually just empower the public employee unions. Sales taxes and property taxes are their life blood for bribing state legislators and eventually controlling most of the legislation.</p>
<p>I Live in California and believe me this is what happens. In the local news we just did an audit of state jobs with a nurse working for the state making $250,000.00 in Overtime last year.</p>
<p>This is what happens with out of control taxes with public unions holding the taxpayers hostage to their ever increasing demands for more pay and benefits.</p>
<p>Increased taxes are the life blood of these leeches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truesoldier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-902878</link>
		<dc:creator>Truesoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-902878</guid>
		<description>Sounds a lot like WA State.  Here the Legislature is trying desperately to pass a $680 million dollar tax package that will hit everyone big time; yet they are also increasing spending while we have a $2-4 billion defeceit (and are facing an $8-9 billion defeceit next year as this years budget includes one time &lt;strike&gt;stimulous&lt;/strike&gt;wasteulous money).

Seeing as they cannot pass the bill (even though they have a majority that the Dems in the US Congress would envy)and the session ends tonight at midngiht, the Dem&#039;s are pushing to have a &quot;special session&quot; so they can continue to work on the taxes.  Of course the &quot;special session&quot; will cost taxpayers $20,000 a day in operating costs (while we are facing a massive defeceit).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds a lot like WA State.  Here the Legislature is trying desperately to pass a $680 million dollar tax package that will hit everyone big time; yet they are also increasing spending while we have a $2-4 billion defeceit (and are facing an $8-9 billion defeceit next year as this years budget includes one time <strike>stimulous</strike>wasteulous money).</p>
<p>Seeing as they cannot pass the bill (even though they have a majority that the Dems in the US Congress would envy)and the session ends tonight at midngiht, the Dem&#8217;s are pushing to have a &#8220;special session&#8221; so they can continue to work on the taxes.  Of course the &#8220;special session&#8221; will cost taxpayers $20,000 a day in operating costs (while we are facing a massive defeceit).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: docflash</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-902863</link>
		<dc:creator>docflash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-902863</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 11th, 2010 at 1:58 pm, sunshinerbray said: &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Take a look at chron.com the Houston Chronicle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 11th, 2010 at 1:58 pm, sunshinerbray said: </p></blockquote>
<p>Take a look at chron.com the Houston Chronicle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunshinerbray</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/11/colorado-democrats-strangle-internet-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-902851</link>
		<dc:creator>sunshinerbray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=44933#comment-902851</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 11th, 2010 at 1:13 pm, docflash said: 
O/T The Texas school board dropped Thomas Jefferson from the curriculum and added Thomas Aquinas for the study of enlightenment.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is just not true.

Jefferson&#039;s contributions are covered in the 8th grade TEKS: (US History to 1877)
(B) explain the roles played by significant individuals during the American Revolution, including...Thomas Jefferson

His contributions are also covered in the 10th grade TEKS: (World History)
(C) explain the impact of Enlightenment ideas from...Thomas Jefferson on political revolutions from 1750-present

Thomas Aquinas appears nowhere in the current TEKS recommendations.  It&#039;s also important to note that nothing is set in stone - yet.  If you&#039;d like to view the current recommendations, you may visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=3643&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=3643&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 11th, 2010 at 1:13 pm, docflash said:<br />
O/T The Texas school board dropped Thomas Jefferson from the curriculum and added Thomas Aquinas for the study of enlightenment.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is just not true.</p>
<p>Jefferson&#8217;s contributions are covered in the 8th grade TEKS: (US History to 1877)<br />
(B) explain the roles played by significant individuals during the American Revolution, including&#8230;Thomas Jefferson</p>
<p>His contributions are also covered in the 10th grade TEKS: (World History)<br />
(C) explain the impact of Enlightenment ideas from&#8230;Thomas Jefferson on political revolutions from 1750-present</p>
<p>Thomas Aquinas appears nowhere in the current TEKS recommendations.  It&#8217;s also important to note that nothing is set in stone &#8211; yet.  If you&#8217;d like to view the current recommendations, you may visit <a href="http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=3643" rel="nofollow">http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=3643</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

