Comments on: NYT pity party for Obama bundler-turned-bungler Desiree Rogers

By: GraniteMan

GraniteMan — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:55:58 +0000

became a victim of a publicity stunt

That’s a polite way of saying she was off screwing around somewhere and not doing the job she was being payed good taxpayer money to do…..Poor baby!

By: jlhudg23

jlhudg23 — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:01:15 +0000

And now, the nominees for “Most Likely to Induce a Spit-Take”: First, the NY Times:

While it has happened to past presidents, though, this was the first time it has happened to Mr. Obama, who prided himself on running a campaign free of the typical petty rivalries and personal subplots that distract other politicians.

Seriously, folks, do we even need to read the other nominees?

By: Scott Brown lets Obama & Co have it with both barrels « VotingFemale

Scott Brown lets Obama & Co have it with both barrels « VotingFemale — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:08:20 +0000

[...] Malkin:NYT pity party for Obama bundler-turned-bungler Desiree Rogers and Nancy Pelosi: Un-merry maid and Panic at the Team O: Asia jaunt delayed for [...]

By: rocketman

rocketman — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:50:03 +0000

***
I don’t think it is fair to “case” on Desiree Rogers. She seems like a clone of most of Comrade Obama’s (PBUH) choices for high government positions and White House advisors.
***
As far as the NYT article claiming this was the first problem personnel pick–what about Van Jones (9/11 truther, open communist), the many persons with tax problems, the CZARS The Messiah put in high positions–without Senate confirmation hearings, etc?
***
The NYT does believe in selective “transparency”–they couldn’t see or find a Catholic in the Vatican–not even on Easter Sunday when the Pope celebrates Mass–unless it advances their agenda. They don’t notice that the emperor and his picks have no clothes–they are just transparent.
***
John Bibb
***

By: TigerLady

TigerLady — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:22:57 +0000

birish said:
I hate to be petty but this woman has the ~~face~~ heart of a weasel.

FIFY

By: Communist Dictator Lover, Sean Penn: Go Die of Rectum Cancer « VotingFemale

Communist Dictator Lover, Sean Penn: Go Die of Rectum Cancer « VotingFemale — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:50:09 +0000

[...] Malkin:NYT pity party for Obama bundler-turned-bungler Desiree Rogers and Nancy Pelosi: Un-merry maid and Panic at the Team O: Asia jaunt delayed for [...]

By: spaceycakes

spaceycakes — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:21:02 +0000

“Tall and striking”
“glamorous Harvard-educated”"brought sizzle” “she swept into Washington” “hot Washington draw” “with grace”

Whew…*smokes cigarette*

By: Stupak: They are ignoring me now; Obama turns to SEIU for threatening House no voters. With what? death? « VotingFemale

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:49:45 +0000

[...] Malkin:NYT pity party for Obama bundler-turned-bungler Desiree Rogers and Nancy Pelosi: Un-merry maid and Panic at the Team O: Asia jaunt delayed for [...]

By: jbirish

jbirish — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:57:06 +0000

I hate to be petty but this woman has the face of a weasel. I’m serious. Keep her away from the hen-house.

By: Jim C.

Jim C. — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:10:49 +0000

“Nobody came to her defense.”

Boo-frickin’-hoo.

By: jangar

jangar — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:28:21 +0000

Dezzi got legs like baseball bats.

By: rightisright

rightisright — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:48:47 +0000

Incompetence and dishonesty seems to be the norm with this administation.

By: fred5676

fred5676 — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:04:37 +0000

“She didn’t get any help from Gibbs, no help from Axelrod, no help from Valerie Jarrett. Nobody came to her defense.”

Noticeably missing from that list: Barack and Michelle.

I don’t even want them in charge of algae blooms

Not that there’s anything wrong with algae blooms.

By: A Little Touch Of Hillary Clinton In The Night — Hillary Is 44

A Little Touch Of Hillary Clinton In The Night — Hillary Is 44 — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:03:12 +0000

[...] That’s what Desirée Rogers, the Michelle Obama and Barack Obama Chicago pal, has learned. Sorry Desirée, no pity party here, you got what you deserved from some sleazy characters. Keep in mind the Big Pink [...]

By: Blackstone

Blackstone — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:40:47 +0000

On March 12th, 2010 at 3:29 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

Y’all need a serious date with reality. I read this article and came away with a very negative picture of Rogers.

So do you agree with the article’s description of her as a “victim” of the party-crashers? That would imply that she wasn’t responsible for what happened to her. Apparently the author of the article thinks so:

“…but inevitably some of them wind up burned by the klieg lights and corrosive politics of Washington.”

Right, it was “corrosive politics”, not her own incompetence, that caused her demise. If you call this a negative article, I’d be fascinated to know what you think a sympathetic one would look like.