He was against it:
Before he was for it:
The Obama administration is proposing to open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.
The proposal — a compromise that will please oil companies and domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states and many environmental organizations — would end a longstanding moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres of ocean.
If this were a sincere change of heart and an honest, stand-alone effort to wean America off foreign oil, it would be worth heralding.
But as always with this administration, there’s a catch, via the American Energy Alliance:
“One major flashpoint in the negotiations has been whether to share drilling revenue with states and to allow states to opt in or out of drilling along their coastlines. It was unclear late Tuesday whether Obama endorses revenue-sharing for states. “It appears the Northern Atlantic and entire Pacific Coast will now be under a de facto ban” for drilling, said Patrick Creighton, a spokesman for the Institute for Energy Research. Even if drilling is ultimately allowed in part of the Atlantic, Creighton said, revenue sharing is an essential incentive for states. The administration’s plans could meet resistance from at least 10 Senate Democrats representing coastal and Great Lakes states who last week raised concerns about “unfettered access to oil and gas drilling” that could jeopardize fishing, tourism and military exercises. The Interior Department retooled the current schedule of offshore leases governing 2007 through 2012 after a federal appeals court last April ruled that the second Bush administration had not done a sufficient environmental review of expanded drilling off the Alaskan coast.
GOP Rep. Mike Pence adds:
“As usual the devil is in the details. Only in Washington, D.C., can you ban more areas to oil and gas exploration than you open up, delay the date of your new leases and claim you’re going to increase production.
“The President’s announcement today is a smokescreen. It will almost certainly delay any new offshore exploration until at least 2012 and include only a fraction of the offshore resources that the previous Administration included in its plan.
“Unfortunately, this is yet another feeble attempt to gain votes for the President’s national energy tax bill that is languishing in the Senate. At the end of the day this Administration’s energy plan is simple: increase the cost of energy on every family in America and trade American jobs oversees at a time when millions of Americans are looking for work.”
***blog comments powered by Disqus
January 16, 2013 02:24 AM by Michelle Malkin
July 13, 2012 10:08 AM by Michelle Malkin
April 4, 2013 09:52 AM by Doug Powers
July 17, 2012 12:56 PM by Michelle Malkin
November 30, 2012 09:52 AM by Michelle Malkin
Daily Caller» Conservative group sues IRS, IRS employees for tax status, damages
Daily Caller» Time for sensible immigration reform is now
Green Room» Great news: Former genocidal despot has really good appeals lawyers
Green Room» Howard Dean: “Benghazi is a laughable joke”
Daily Caller» If it’s Tuesday, Daily Kos must be publishing openly misogynist hate speech against a conservative woman
Gay Patriot» No Bush warrant for e-mail correspondence of NYTimes reporters
Green Room» Video: Time for another “Anchorman 2″ teaser trailer
Gay Patriot» More Obama scandal news