Our new national security plan: Weaken, whitewash, and wait for whirled peas
| Tweet |

Look out. The retreater-in-chief has his big brush and can of whitewash and he is fixing to paint all our troubles away:
President Barack Obama’s advisers will remove religious terms such as “Islamic extremism” from the central document outlining the U.S. national security strategy and will use the rewritten document to emphasize that the United States does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terror, counterterrorism officials said.
The change is a significant shift in the National Security Strategy, a document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventative war and currently states: “The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century.”
The officials described the changes on condition of anonymity because the document still was being written, and the White House would not discuss it. But rewriting the strategy document will be the latest example of Obama putting his stamp on U.S. foreign policy, like his promises to dismantle nuclear weapons and limit the situations in which they can be used.
The revisions are part of a larger effort about which the White House talks openly, one that seeks to change not just how the United States talks to Muslim nations, but also what it talks to them about, from health care and science to business startups and education.
(Yeah, because the dhimmi diplomats at the Bush State Department didn’t do enough of that.)
The kumbaya candidate promised to usher in a national security plan of rainbows and unicorns and a world without jihad. Now, he’s delivering on the delusion with a full-scale retreat from the preventative war against Muslim terrorists and the decimation of our nuclear defenses. John Bolton sums it up:
The Nuclear Posture Review is deeply troubling in many respects, starting at the conceptual level with its unfounded assertion that the need for American nuclear deterrence has declined. By further unilaterally limiting the circumstances in which the U.S. would use nuclear weapons to protect itself and its allies, the Obama administration is in fact increasing international instability and the risks of future conflicts. By abandoning the reliable replacement warhead project, and drastically limiting programs to ensure the safety and reliablity of our existing nuclear stockpile, the president is risking our security and obtaining nothing in return.
NRO has more on Obama’s nuclear posturing here.
We’ve traded in a reality-based national security strategy for a Birkenstock bumper-sticker fantasy plan.
TSA: Training Sky-bound Illegal Aliens
July 20, 2012 08:22 AM by Michelle Malkin
A National Security History Lesson for Marco Rubio
April 26, 2013 08:35 AM by Michelle Malkin
Occupy Open Borders: Obama delivers 800,000 more illegal alien deportation waivers
June 15, 2012 09:55 AM by Michelle Malkin
NYC Mayor Bloomberg set to ban sale of sweetened drinks larger than 16 ounces; Update: Bloomberg supports ‘National Donut Day’ tomorrow
May 31, 2012 10:23 AM by Doug Powers
The Blind Sheik and our mute president
January 9, 2013 09:12 AM by Michelle Malkin
Gay Patriot
» Did W (or his minions) ask what books his political adversaries were reading?Gay Patriot
» No Bush warrant for e-mail correspondence of NYTimes reportersDaily Caller
» RAHN: Cheer up, Righties — We’re all victims now!Green Room
» Video: Time for another “Anchorman 2″ teaser trailerDaily Caller
» Swarthmore liberals go to war over fossil fuels, ethnic studiesGay Patriot
» On the March 2010 meeting between Obama & the IRS Union ChiefGreen Room
» Great news: Former genocidal despot has really good appeals lawyersGreen Room
» Gibbs: I don’t read Maureen Dowd. Dowd: Backatcha





