Snort: Huffpo writer moans about Left’s lack of “women of any wattage”
Well, well. It looks like the libs are coming down with a case of Strong Conservative Woman Envy.
Take a look at this:
The fact remains that there is a “Hillary hole,” with women wanting their turn, while people hunger for something radically different, which is currently being filled by the Tea Party, a star named Sarah and her fans. Not surprisingly, as poll after poll on her rolls out, the narrative on Sarah Palin continues to be filled out unfairly. I know, you’re shocked. But love her or hate her, whether she runs in 2012 or not, when you look at the left, the reality is there’s no anti-Palin progressive who matches what Palin’s got.
…Mrs. Palin’s politics aren’t for me, and though I pine to see hot headliners from the left, instead we get the likes of Claire McCaskill, Kathleen Sebelius and other Obama blue dog duds, with no women of any wattage in sight.
What makes the piece extra-amusing: The female writer, Taylor Marsh, posted her lament on the blog of political cross-dressing Gingrichite-turned-liberal Arianna Huffington.
No comment from Marsh on Arianna’s wattage.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 |
S.E. Cupp, Hustler, and the four stages of conservative female abuse
May 23, 2012 02:13 PM by Michelle Malkin
142 CommentsPalin officially endorses desperate, clingy Orrin Hatch; time to rally around Dan Liljenquist
May 22, 2012 11:32 PM by Michelle Malkin
83 CommentsNoted MSNBC mocker of Sarah Palin’s intellect doesn’t do so well on Jeopardy
May 15, 2012 10:33 AM by Doug Powers
82 Comments
Another “novelty” swipe at a conservative Tea Party woman
April 22, 2012 10:59 AM by Michelle Malkin
105 Comments
Ann Coulter’s “novelty candidate” swipe at Sarah Palin
April 2, 2012 12:27 PM by Michelle Malkin
356 Comments
New video: ShePAC strikes back at misogynist Bill Maher
March 8, 2012 10:52 PM by Michelle Malkin
103 Comments
More CPAC speeches in 20 words
February 11, 2012 06:53 PM by Michelle Malkin
77 CommentsPalin: If I Lived in South Carolina, I’d Vote for Newt
January 17, 2012 10:28 PM by Doug Powers
127 Comments
Categories: Huffpo,Sarah Palin
Villainous Company
» Must Read Post of the Day. Possibly, the YearSister Toldjah
» Barack Obama: Can we call him a Socialist now?
Note to Ms. Marsh – the lack of wattage on the Left is not limited to the women.
I still contend after seeing Obama’s first “pitch” the other day that Hillary can’t run on being the first female president anymore.
Arianna is extremely low-wattage. One might even be tempted to call her a “dim bulb.”
James Watt in drag? What about Helen Thomas in a string bikini?
There. You have the mental image as well! Now for some bleach for the cerebellum
God knows Huffington is about as illuminating as a 4 watt bulb. The way Guiliani and even other liberals on Morning Joe chewed her up and spit her out is indication of that.
I find it amusing that liberals are complaining that liberals are, well, liberals (intellectual lightweights), and almost universally unattractive.
What??? Is he saying Palamino to Pelosi?
The “Hillary hole”?
….eeewwww
spot on!!!
Wait, what about Nancy Pelosi? You know, of “Know Your Power” fame (a very powerful book), most powerful woman in America…. The strong, inspiring, powerful Nancy Pelosi. The MSM has been fawning over her power for several years and she doesn’t even get an honorable mention?
On April 9th, 2010 at 3:51 pm, max said:
I thought South Park covered that with the snuke. Agreed on bad imagry.
Thanks a lot! Once read, some things cannot be unread!
(Honey, have you seen the Visine and a brillo pad? I need to get the read out!)
Which reminds me, did Obowmao say anything about the reduction of snukes in the snizz?
Which reminds me, did Obowmao say anything about the reduction of snukes in the snizz?
Nope but he did say there will be plenty of Corpsemen ready to deploy in case of mass showers after these visuals.
I hate race and gender identity politics.
I am always wary when the left picks our heroes and candidates for us.
The left is always holding up Sarah Palin as a sterling example. It just makes me more wary of Palin.
Is Sarah our Golda or Maggie?
A rare moment of liberal honesty. Even rarer in that it is an accurate reflection of liberals themselves.
I shall have to go home and record this in my diary.
Yeah, we’ve got intelligent, independent-minded beauties…
and they’ve got ignorant, Kool-aid drinking, aesthetically challenged harridans.
We’ve known that all along.
The wattage of truth trumps the wattage of hate.
Yes, the Media had a ball laughing and chortling about how they selected John McLame to be the Repub candidate. I don’t think I’ll forget anytime soon, but can’t guarantee that the rest of the uninformed public will do the same.
We have wattage. They have dotage.
who knew, Conservative women are smart, articulate … and have the hottness factor.
not going well for dummies are us is it
Really. Easy to get drawn in. At one time long ago I was thrilled with McCain and Romney. Still I think she must play to the weenies and fickle independents and blue-dog types to keep from scaring them off.
Well, maybe they’ll eventually notice that their men are pretty much a bunch of limp-wristed panty-waisted losers too.
Well said on both counts. I was screaming throughout the campaign as the MSM was picking off any legitimate potential conservative until they got down to McCain. They were terrified of Rudy, but we really had no conservatives in that race.
It may be a blessing that the Marxists swept totally into power. Sooner or later the country had to see what evil they are capable of. With a Republican President they could still get a lot of poison into the water and continue to blame Republicans for all the problems they created. They are exposed now.
There are a LOT of dimbulb women in the Dem Socialist party. About the only conceivable political policy involvement they have is preserving abortion through the various displays of hedonist, sexual behavior they can come up with.
Note to these dimbulb women: just because you like to open your legs to any man within a 1 mile radius doesn’t make you liberated or smart. It just makes you unhinged and a slave to policies with unintended consequences.
What a shame. We have all the intelligent and attractive women on our side. Being all angry and whiny 24/7 is very unappealing.
I’m replaying the image of Hillary Clinton channeling the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt. Some things you just can’t ever forget…
How can anyone assume Hillary is anything better than just another dim bulb, too? It’s going to take years to repair the damage our Chief Smart Diplomat has wreaked upon our country.
When you arguments are based on moral equivalency, villification, and class warfare, frankly they come off as unfeminine. It is seriously very hard for women to successfully use those tactics.
But that’s all the Left has so…..
On April 9th, 2010 at 5:10 pm, regularguy said:
If by years you mean sucessive administrations. I really do not think the One’s and her enlightened diplomacy can be resolved with short term actions…
Must have gotten by her highness herself Arianna. Wonder what she thinks of (impliedly) being called low wattage? As one poster already pointed out, there is a major wattage shortage across gender lines in the Marxist Dem party.
To illustrate the point, check out liberal vs conservative women. The choice of background music is just perfect. Just be sure to have the eyewash handy.
On April 9th, 2010 at 4:49 pm, MarcoPolo said:
Very few of the Republicans are anything but “a bunch of limp-wristed panty-waisted losers” either I mean let’s be honest here. Michael Steele?, Gov. Mark Sanford? Mark Foley?
I mean let’s look around, their aren’t a lot of people in politics today who’ve any demonstrable backbone or even a set of cojones. The biggest set of them belong to a woman who half the Republicans castigate. Might not be the brightest bulb out but definitely more manly than most of her colleagues in the party.
Just reason #572,639 why I’ve abandoned the Republican party to its own demise and only back individual conservatives while knowing over half of them will turn out to be greedy, power hungry, spineless wonders. Our country and its institutions no longer build men from boys.
And, that’s the bright side. The men are even worse!
Evidently some liberals feel that viewing the video I linked to above is too graphic for those under 18. You have to log in to YOUTUBE to see it. Perhaps they are right, viewing those liberal woman could even give me nightmares!
A major failing of the left is that they look at women as a single block
They see young attractive, or not, women and think they all want to be doe eyed flower children followers like the girls they remember from the 60s, hint to their age…
Instead women just like any other group cannot be so easily id’d
It is telling to hear a leftie lament this, their message must be falling hard in the polls
I suspect we will continue to hear stories about how studid members of each group is for not seeing and the “genius” of the lefts position
Proof positive that the Democrat Party is a coalition party.
If one is smart enough to have “wattage”, then one is obviously smart enough to tell right from wrong.
But Taylor Marsh obviously doesn’t have enough “wattage” to figure that out on her own. Like all looney leftwing liberals, she figures someone else owes them “wattage.”
Don’t you just love it that the Left has such a serious case of Palin-envy? When they try to foist some liberal equivalent on us, what do they do? Whom do they pick? Debbie Wasserman-Schultz? Ewwww. No go. And for media equivalency, do they seriously expect Rachel Maddow to go up against Ann Coulter? Urpp. Sorry. Can’t see it. And then there’s the harridan herself, Ariana Huffington. Woof.
I just saw a few seconds of our hot political babe ridiculing Obama on his nuclear dealing with the Ruskies.
I totally agree with her criticism. And I loved the package that it comes in as much as anybody, at least when it was fresh and new during the campaign.
But for me, Palin’s act does not wear wear well at all. It was exciting the first few time I heard her heaping scorn and ridicule on the Dems. But all that dripping, folksie sarcasm can be too much, after a while. Especially from someone who is unproven in any skills other than delivering a fiery speech and getting off some one-liners.
Now I cringe when she shows up on my TV.
Arianna is a mercury filled new energy bulb-twisted, dangerous overpriced and not all the useful..
Maybe the Budweiser advertisers can come up with a “Real Women of Wattage” commercial.
That’s good Neanderthal!
Not much light, warmth, or energy. But, lots of deadly poison!
*I believe Bubba is still looking for it, just north of the cankles!
One minute you were talking about Sarah Palin and then suddenly you switched to talking about Obama. Have you been checked for Attention Deficit Disorder?
I was just reading the comment section in an online newspaper about the war of words between Obowma and Sarah. Most of the commenters were libs and they were saying they hope that Sarah runs and that Sarah is the best thing going for the democrats–kind of like how we feel about the nutjobs running the country right now–they almost guarantee a republican landslide in the next 2 elections providing of course, the media is not allowed to choose our 2012 presidential candidate.
What it boils down to is an intense jealousy on the left of all the smart, articulate, and beautiful women on the right. Wooohooo, you go girls!
A burnt out CFL has more wattage then most of the left.
How about Debbie Wasserman-Schultz?
Oh, wait….
Seriously, is there a liberal woman who is adored and who has any horsepower?
Pelosi? Maxine Waters? Anita Dunn? Valerie Jarrett? Obama’s wife? I can barely choke back the tears from laughter.
I’ll take conservative women any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
Dim bulbs go for what’s easy.
Dim bulbs know they are dim so they stick together.
Nuff said.
I wonder where our men are of any wattage.
From Mrs Cheney to Michelle Bachman, the conservative message is best represented by women.
Not to be left out is MM.
-unfortunately for Taylor Marsh, this just happens to go with the territory of the Left.
No Michelle Malkin …
I’ll comment.
Arianna Huffington is such a dim bulb, it would be measured in milliwatts at best.
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
In no particular order:
Ann Coulter,
Liz Cheney,
Lynne Cheney,
Michelle Malkin,
Sara Palin,
Star Parker,
Mary Katherine Hamm,
Ginny Thomas,
Pamela Geller,
Rebecca Hagelin,
Helle Dale,
Becky Norton Dunlop,
Allison Fraser,
Jennifer Marshall,
Nina Owcherenko,
Nancy Pearcy,
Laura Ingram.
If you want strength of intellect and character and judgment start with this list and not the HuffPo…
There are no leftist women of substance because there are no leftists of substance! Geez, they will never get it…
.
If they had any “wattage” they wouldn’t be leftists … doh!
Leftist chicks are dumber. That’s just how it is.
They’re easier too, but you have to be careful about that because they carry diseases. No big surprise, considering …
Curiously, although they are easier, they are not more … how shall I say … warm blooded or amorously inspired. Surprisingly often, quite the contrary.
The really good looking leftist chicks tend to be brainless performer types, and the ones with any detectable IQ tend to be over-educated sexually damaged drabs.
All in all we’re doing really well in that area.
Malkin, Palin, Coulter, Crowley … it’s a long list. I won’t attempt it here. But we’ve got an amazing line-up of gorgeous brainy babes.
The emergence of this phalanx of ferocious feminine dazzlers is an interesting phenomenon when considered historically.
The left, seeing the emergence of a new collective to exploit early on did everything in their dark powers to hijack the development of the public visibility of individual women — a privilege which, prior to capitalism, had been reserved for the daughters and wives of royalty.
And they had most people fooled for a long long time, or at least several decades.
Now we see that growing numbers of people, impressive not only as thinkers, writers, professionals and officials of various sorts, but impressive as women-qua-women are rising up in opposition — and ferocious opposition at that — to the left, and are standing forward as defenders of freedom.
Rising up, I will add, from among the common folk.
Not what the progressive and leftist theorists had been anticipating.
Too bad about all those girls trapped in Russia and China.
But we’ve got ours. And I’m sure there are more on the way.
.
Oh. BTW, let’s not forget Bachman in all of this.
I got to meet Bachmann at the rally. I stood not more than 3 feet away from her while she gave an interview to someone.
She is really petite if not diminutive…
I should have added her to my list above but I was in a hurry.
Ewwww…
Well, over in the EU they let the conservative Muslim men run all over them.