Denver radicals issue Tea Party crash call: “Cut loose and let these racist crackers know they are opposed.”

By Michelle Malkin  •  April 14, 2010 05:41 PM

A Mumia-worshiping nutball group in Denver has just issued this Tea Party sabotage call:

On April 15th, the Tea Party Movement is planning major rallies throughout the country, including one in Denver. Part of this year’s convergence is a blatantly anti-Mexican ‘Tea Party Against Amnesty.’

The Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist Movement is calling on all radicals – anarchists and communists, Mexican and Black nationalists, Third Worldists and Indigenists, students, social critics and anti-racists – to come out and oppose this vile, hateful message in the midst of the Tea Party Movement. Bring signs, bullhorns, props, a hat and sunglasses, etc. Cut loose and let these racist crackers know they are opposed.

What: Oppose the racist ‘Tea Party Against Amnesty’
When: Thursday, April 15th; 10am-1pm
Where: Across the street from the Capitol building

“Cut loose?”

I hope law enforcement is on alert and on guard.

You’ll love their logo:

Be careful out there. Alinsky’s avenging angels are loaded for bear.

H/T Peoples Press Collective/El Presidente.

T.L. James has tips on thwarting the crashers.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Tea Party

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:13 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “Here’s a real cracker; a white moderate rebuplican afraid of opposing any Obama policy for fear of being called a racist. The Graham Cracker.”

    That could stick. Quick copy right the phrase before its too late…

    :)

  2. #102
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:13 am, purplepeep said:

    Weary Citizen said:

    “Cut loose and let these racist crackers know they are opposed.”

    LMAO. This moron doesn’t even get the irony of his statement. He uses a racial slur in the same sentence he yells racist?

    I believe it’s pretty common for people whose minds run on emotion instead of intelligence to say really, really dumb stuff.

  3. #103
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:13 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “to say really, really dumb stuff.”

    And I feel so badly about my self when I do.

  4. #104
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:21 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    I for one hope any of the folks at meetings at which the opposition makes the effort to attend does not take as their first approach isolation and a certain degree of hostility. They opposition is after all coming to us so to speak. I hope the first approach is hospitality and informing.

    Wonder how many of them can be converted or at least a seed planted that will grow into a conservative.

    How many folks on the left who get a seed planted by hearing Rush on the radio, read Levin, hear Hugh Hewitt, etc., become conservatives?

    We need not force the truth of conservative ideas into the mix. We are secure in our belief because conservative ideas have been tested and have been shown to be true, solid and deeply rooted in reality.

    The enemy is coming to a place where people who hold conservative ideas are gathered. I hope folks at these meetings will see this as a chance to educate, change and bring REAL hope to some of these leftist goofballs.

  5. #105
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:21 am, Ty85719 said:

    Do these frothing mouth “liberal,” “progressive” lunatics realize that their behaiour is nothing short of fascist? Until now, malicious, counterproductive behaviour has been so rare at Tea Party events that is negligible – anything that occurs from this point forward can be directly pitched into the laps of these agent provocateurs.

    This truly is the epitomy of leftist ideology – it cannot compete in the arena of ideas and must resort to sabotage in a desperate effort to bring everyone down to their level

  6. #106
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:24 am, spaceycakes said:

    From you. From me.

    b-cat–wow, I didn’t know I was oppressing them; I didn’t realize I had that power. Sheesh, they doing a lousy job! Mrcakes had to mow the lawn himself!

  7. #107
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:25 am, purplepeep said:

    jsmiddleton4 said:

    “to say really, really dumb stuff.”

    And I feel so badly about my self when I do.

    Yeah, but you and I and most other folks have the good common sense not to do it on flyers and hand them out. We just smack our heads, say “DOH!” and hope nobody else noticed :)

  8. #108
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:27 am, Ignatius Reilly said:

    Greensboro, NC, 1979: Five radical communists agitators were shot dead in a confrontation that they genned up and carried into the streets. Of course, it was KKKers and Nazis who answered their challenge and blew five of them away. None of the alleged KKKers or Nazis were convicted of any crime. (I say “alleged,” because I do not know if the shooters were really KKKers and Nazis or merely assumed that identity for the smackdown. Whoever they were, they did God’s work that day.) The violent atmosphere was a direct result of the violent rhetoric from the Left, which named their demonstration, the “Death to the Klan March.”

  9. #109
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:28 am, Laree said:

    Maybe the answer to the Denver protest by The Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist Movement is ICE?

    It’s possible that ICE might be looking for some of these people? OR even our FBI?

  10. #110
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:28 am, Lindsay said:

    Another clue to spot the weak tea baggers, other than rampant biohazard BO, is if they are so ugly you have to avert your eyes.

    Look out, also, for the hags wearing one of those dumb Che shirts without a bra.

    Sic em, y’all.

  11. #111
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:30 am, b-cat said:

    spaceycakes-

    Oh, I know. In the words of the Stranglers, “For such a villain I am criminally underpaid”.

  12. #112
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:35 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    What I meant to emphasize in one of the prior links…

    Published: Tuesday, January 6, 2009

    BERKELEY, California —

    “For the last eight years – and probably for much longer – most radicals have been mourning for our country,” he said. “Obviously the empire is not going to fall overnight, but at least there’s been a popular vote that changes the direction of the last 40 years.”

  13. #113
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:38 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:21 am, Ty85719 said:

    Do these frothing mouth “liberal,” “progressive” lunatics realize that their behaiour is nothing short of fascist?

    This truly is the epitomy of leftist ideology – it cannot compete in the arena of ideas and must resort to sabotage in a desperate effort to bring everyone down to their level

    Those who can’t handle the truth,
    try to silence those who speak it.

  14. #114
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:39 am, purplepeep said:

    b-cat said:
    In the words of the Stranglers, “For such a villain I am criminally underpaid”.

    I hope you’re referring to some rock group there :)

  15. #115
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:46 am, Dimsdale said:

    Purple is the new brown (shirts).

  16. #116
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:46 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “shirts without a bra.”

    Finally a reason to take a day off and attend one of these meetings!

  17. #117
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:47 am, fgmorley said:

    Fight fire with fire. The TEA movement is doing just that by congregating, sending their messages, and yelling in the immortal words of Paddy Chayefsky:
    “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it anymore” (Network, 1976).

    Only this time we don’t have the networks from which to broadcast our message.

    There is no better advertising than word-of-mouth.

  18. #118
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:48 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:46 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “shirts without a bra.”

    Finally a reason to take a day off and attend one of these meetings!

    OK, but I will only use the one good eye.

  19. #119
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:48 am, hawkeye54 said:

    This truly is the epitomy of leftist ideology – it cannot compete in the arena of ideas and must resort to sabotage in a desperate effort to bring everyone down to their level

    For which they tirelessly work. Decades of educational indoctrination has provided a vast number of useful idiots to do the leftist’s bidding.

  20. #120
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:50 am, b-cat said:

    I hope you’re referring to some rock group there

    I often assume people misspent the eighties as I did.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNGdkR7lVSs

    Come to think of it, it may have been the Jam. Oh well.

  21. #121
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:52 am, Ignatius Reilly said:

    From Wiki on “Greensboro Massacre”:

    The Death to the Klan March was to begin in a predominantly black housing project called Morningside Homes. Communist organizers publicly challenged the Klan to present themselves and “face the wrath of the people”.[2] During the rally, a caravan of cars containing Klansmen and members of the American Nazi Party drove by the housing projects. After being heckled by Klansmen, several marchers began to attack the Klansmens’ cars with sticks. A standoff ended in a scuffle, whereupon Klansmen and Nazis left their cars and wildly fired into the crowd with shotguns, rifles and pistols. Cauce, Waller, and Sampson were killed at the scene. Smith was shot between the eyes when she peeked from her hiding place. Eleven others were wounded. One of them, Dr Nathan, later died from his wounds.[3]

    A couple points worth making about this incident:

    - The Left began it by staging a “Death to the Klan” event and baiting the Klan to appear and “face the wrath of the people.”

    - When some Klansmen took the bait and showed up and responded to the taunting demonstration with taunts of their own, the ~communists~ escalated the demonstration to violence by attacking the Klan vehicles with sticks. (Reminds me of incidents outside the 08 GOP convention.)

  22. #122
    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:54 am, Misscheryl said:

    It’s going to get ugly(ier).

  23. #123
    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:03 pm, RedDog said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 10:19 am, John Deaux said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 9:34 am, RedDog said:

    An allusion to the cracking bullwhip days in Florida and Georgia.

    The Florida Cracker refers the cracking of the whip to drive cattle. We have a Florida Cracker Trail and Cracker Houses like the type crackers would have lived in at the time.

    How it became a term of derision is beyond me

    It came from the belief that the whip-wielders were white racists who also used them on blacks during the most racially charged times.

  24. #124
    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:11 pm, Flyoverman said:

    I am elated at these events. I truly am.

    One of the biggest challenges in dealing with the Left is that they are masters of disguise. They are superb at hiding their true intent.

    The growth of the Tea Party and the reaction of the people to Obama’s broken promises and obvious radicalism has put the Left’s future in peril. This threat has FORCED the Left to unmask and reveal their true selves.

    Here they are for everyone to see. Desparation has forced them into the open. Ask any veteran what “enemy in the open” means. It’s a good day!

  25. #125
    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:12 pm, purplepeep said:

    b-cat said:

    “I hope you’re referring to some rock group there”

    I often assume people misspent the eighties as I did.

    I misspent my whole life, heh. But I successfully ignored most of the 80s music. It’s only now that I can handle it, lol.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNGdkR7lVSs

    I marked it to give a listen a bit later when I can crank up my sound system.

    Come to think of it, it may have been the Jam. Oh well.

    Couldn’t tell by me. And the sad thing about that is I’ve been a rocker since the 60s (garage band days), still work with music industry folk and even fancy myself something of a music trivia buff. Alas, there’s some vast music-era chasms in my brain circuitry. But it’s kinda cool that things like this are ‘new” to me.

  26. #126
    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:15 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah is that the recipe for miscreant stew?

  27. #127
    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:16 pm, happy2behere said:

    I went on their webiste and posted the question, “What if the majority of the Tea Partiers are not racist?” No answer.

    So who is repressing them? Certainly not I. But my iron gate and seven foot fence with spikes keeps them far, far away.

  28. #128
    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:20 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    The growth of the Tea Party and the reaction of the people to Obama’s broken promises and obvious radicalism has put the Left’s future in peril. This threat has FORCED the Left to unmask and reveal their true selves.

    This century, post-modern liberalism and progressive politics will be dealt a serious blow if not completely eradicated and it will probably never rise again for a long, long time.

    Liberals and progessives do not have the will or the strength that we have. They will be defeated and defeated with ease.

  29. #129
    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:23 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Funny story…

    Two friends of mine first met each other at work, and the friendship progressed to the point where one friend invited the other over to his house for dinner.

    The white friend showed up at the black friend’s house, and when they stepped in the front door, the black friend’s young son came running up to them, looked at the white friend, then looked at his Dad, then looked at the white friend again and said,

    Cracker?

    The white friend looked at the black friend, who said,

    He has saltine crackers in his hand, and he’s offering you one.

    :-)

  30. #130
    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:31 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    flyoverman:

    One of the biggest challenges in dealing with the Left is that they are masters of disguise. They are superb at hiding their true intent.

    As you posted this, fly, I was watching Kathleen Sebelius explain to the noon anchors on my local TV station that polls show so much opposition to Obamacare because people don’t understand it and there is so much “misinformation.”

    Of course, Obama’s real problem is that people ~do~ understand it. Sebelius was making a big point about how, if you like your doctor, you will be able to keep him and nothing will change. What a hide-the-ball lie!

    Not only was the whole financial picture painted by team Obama based on wild distortions and misrepresentations, they also, of course, concealed their big-picture plan: They intend to destroy the American healthcare system as it now exists. This is like them marching an elephant into your living room while you are watching a little TV and assuring you that the elephant is going to stay over in the corner and wouldn’t bother you at all. Heck, your doctor may quit practicing medicine altogether…probably not this year but maybe next year or the year after that. And even if you do keep your doctor, he will eventually be working for the government under “single payer,” after they have destroyed the private insurance market. When he works for the government, then he will do what the government tells him. That is socialized medicine. Not “lite”…it is the whole package.

    But, as flyoverman, notes, nothing with these bastards is what it appears to be. It is all wrapped in stealth and deceit and denial. But they know where they are going and where they intend to drag us. I am fed up.

  31. #131
    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:32 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 10:39 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 10:36 am, b-cat said:

    Third WorldReichist

    I just wanted to clarify that I was not calling b-cat that term.
    I was just piggy-backing off of what she wrote in her comment.

    The “Third Worldists” are very much like “Third Reichists” in their behavior.

  32. #132
    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:47 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:31 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    But, as flyoverman, notes, nothing with these bastards is what it appears to be. It is all wrapped in stealth and deceit and denial.

    They wrap everything in stealth and deceit because they are followers of the father of lies.

    You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it.

    John 8:44

  33. #133
    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:54 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 11:09 am, b-cat said:

    liberation from whom? Castro? Mugabe? The Saudi royal family?

    From you. From me.

    Spacey, just tuned in and didn’t read what prompted this but I got to thinkin about b-cat’s response. I looked at it as the importance and responsibility of the individual here in America. Kinda like in the most general sense; who am I (or a group of ‘mes’) to tell anyone how to live their life’? A don’t tread on me sort of thing.

  34. #134
    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:04 pm, spaceycakes said:

    the Third World masses and support their struggles for liberation.

    that quote is what I was questioning, Gladz….the ‘third worldists’ that don’t realize how asinine their rhetoric is…but I guess their ignorance is what keeps them in that ‘third world’.

  35. #135
    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:07 pm, spaceycakes said:

    RedDog said:…A bizarre phenomenon that started in the’50s

    Ah, yes; Kerouac and Ginsberg.

    Puh-leeze. Do me a favor guys; shut up and shower.

  36. #136
    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:12 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    struggles for liberation

    The very core of “liberation theology” is Marxism.

  37. #137
    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:17 pm, J S Ragman said:

    calling on all radicals – anarchists and communists, Mexican and Black nationalists, Third Worldists and Indigenists, students, social critics and anti-racists

    What, no Methodists?

  38. #138
    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:21 pm, b-cat said:

    I just wanted to clarify that I was not calling b-cat that term.
    I was just piggy-backing off of what she wrote in her comment.

    I took no offense to the 3rd reich thing, I knew what you meant. For the record, I am most certainly a he.

  39. #139
    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:25 pm, b-cat said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:54 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    Wow, thanks. I wasn’t trying to be profound, just glib. I live in a very left wing area and I know how these people think.

  40. #140
    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:26 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    When I think about these Marxist agitators and the need for us to act responsibily, I feel like Sal (John Cazale) when he whined to Sonny (Al Pacino) in Dog Day Afternoon that Sonny had promised that they could shoot one.

  41. #141
    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:37 pm, John Deaux said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 12:03 pm, RedDog said:

    It came from the belief that the whip-wielders were white racists who also used them on blacks during the most racially charged times.

    I understand the purported logic behind it. It just seems to be a strange thing to pick as an insult is all.

  42. #142
    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:47 pm, spaceycakes said:

    John Deaux–what’s even stranger, as I have said before, that very few of contemporary caucasians are descended from those whip-wielders of yore. I, for one, believe my forebears to have been too poverty-stricken to own a whip, let alone another human being.

  43. #143
    On April 15th, 2010 at 2:28 pm, John Deaux said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:47 pm, spaceycakes said:
    I, for one, believe my forebears to have been too poverty-stricken to own a whip, let alone another human being.

    I’d be willing to bet that’s the same story for 99+% of the people who fought the war on both sides. It really was about states’ rights.

  44. #144
    On April 15th, 2010 at 2:33 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:21 pm, b-cat said:

    For the record, I am most certainly a he.

    Sorry about the mix-up!
    :oops:
    I’m not sure why I thought you were a she.

  45. #145
    On April 15th, 2010 at 2:36 pm, purplepeep said:

    ITookTheRedPill said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:21 pm, b-cat said:

    For the record, I am most certainly a he.

    Sorry about the mix-up!
    :oops:
    I’m not sure why I thought you were a she.

    You were thrown off by b-cat’s great legs, Pill. ;)

  46. #146
    On April 15th, 2010 at 3:06 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 2:36 pm, purplepeep said:

    You were thrown off by b-cat’s great legs, Pill.

    Too much information……. ;)

  47. #147
    On April 15th, 2010 at 3:53 pm, jeanie said:

    Go ahead lefties, make a scene. Should make for good media.

  48. #148
    On April 15th, 2010 at 4:53 pm, RetFireman said:

    I have an honest, serious question for those opposed to is Tea Party folks:

    If we individually or the movement as a whole are so racist, biggotted, hate-filled and violent as you claim we are and as the MSM is attempting to paint us, then why would you need to “infiltrate” us or “crash” our demonstrations and use such signs and other attempts to paint us as such?

    Would we not be doing so ourselves? Would there not already be enough evidence already of what you claim so that you would not need to show up with your ridiculously sophomoric signs and slogans that are so patently pathetic as to expose yourselves?

    Just seems to me that if what you have been claiming were true, the evidence would speak for itself and the “smoking gun” would not be a “throw down” from one of these anti-Tea Party groups and/or their ilk.

  49. #149
    On April 15th, 2010 at 6:26 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 2:28 pm, John Deaux said:

    On April 15th, 2010 at 1:47 pm, spaceycakes said:
    I, for one, believe my forebears to have been too poverty-stricken to own a whip, let alone another human being.

    I’d be willing to bet that’s the same story for 99+% of the people who fought the war on both sides. It really was about states’ rights.

    Then my great-great-great grandfather and great-great-great uncles were that rare 1% – they were abolitionists to the core (as were many federal troops) and one great-great-great uncle gave his life at Gettysburg for his fellow man. It was mostly the gentlemen in gray who were fighting for “States Rats” (that’s what union soldiers thought confederate prisoners were saying!)

  50. #150
    On April 15th, 2010 at 6:36 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    I just got back from the Denver Tea party, I was usually within a couple of feet of the speakers so there wasn’t much disturbance up close to the important folks, but there was one fellow who kept screaming “Revolution!” and other 60′s failure nonsense. The folks around him started taking his picture and he wisely shut his pie-hole, but at one point I could hear a left wing rent-a-crowd belching monosyllabic grunts hysterically into bullhorns ‘way off in the distance… until a semi on Lincoln Street gave them an air horn serenade that caused their wee bitty brains to leak out of their skulls through shattered ear drums (God Bless the truck driving man!) . Not long later we all sang God Bless America and I didn’t hear their squeals any more.

  51. #151
    On April 16th, 2010 at 8:02 am, Jimmie said:

    Liberal “logic” I know it’s not quite logic if there is no reasoning attached?….anyway in this case the liberal “logic” is really out there

    “lets show up the TEA people as a bunch of racists…they don’t seem to have any racists….so we will send in some of OUR racists and have them try to blend in with decent people?….”

    Is that a typical liberal plan totally devoid of reasoning or what?

  52. #152
    On April 16th, 2010 at 8:44 am, b-cat said:

    I’m not sure why I thought you were a she.

    You were thrown off by b-cat’s great legs, Pill.

    More likely my Pythonesque falsetto. :lol:

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook