See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #101
   On April 17th, 2010 at 11:32 am, Gwillie said:

   I have video of a coffee party guy admitting that they don’t have any “poeple of color” in their group… They must be racist
   You can see my reportn on the Olympia WA tea party here

2. #102
   On April 17th, 2010 at 3:28 pm, Vntnrse said:

   The El Cajon, CA Tea Party had two “disrupters”. One was a little, very young teenage girl running around with an Obama poster which on the back she had written “Legalize Weed”. I wanted to ask her if she wrote that because she couldn’t spell Marijuana.

   The other was an older teenage boy that wanted to shout that we had Obama in office because we (the country’s voters) wanted to avoid the recession of Bush’s eight years. Someone kept trying to reply that the recession was caused by Barney Frank with Fannie and Freddie and Bawhney was a Democrat. The young “gentleman” jumped into a car and sped away when he realized that I had him on video tape though.

3. #103
   On April 17th, 2010 at 6:37 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

   On April 16th, 2010 at 4:27 pm, chapoutier said:
   What we are talking about is whether you can compartmentalize two separate aspects of a person, to ignore the evil in favor of an independent good.

   I believe everybody does that to some extent with regards to everyone they meet. Does the good outweigh the bad? As every man is a flawed being in one way or another. Take you for example, many here tolerate your evil left leanings in hopes of the occasional good wine recipes. You’ve been the beneficiary of people compartmentalizing your evil in hopes of the independant good. We all have different levels of tolerance and rationalization. It appears that Atheling has reached his limit.

4. #104
   On April 17th, 2010 at 7:54 pm, chapoutier said:

   I’m not apologizing for slavery, you dimwitted fool. I’m giving the context of the history there in a dispassionate manner.

   Yes, you are. Just because you refuse to admit it does not make it any less true.

   You know what “context” is a code word for? Moral relativism.

5. #105
   On April 17th, 2010 at 8:36 pm, chapoutier said:

   BS, chapoutier.

   You’re a lying POS.

   Do you know what moral relativism means? I don’t think we would be having this conversation if you did.

6. #106
   On April 17th, 2010 at 8:48 pm, chapoutier said:

   You know what “context” is a code word for? Moral relativism.

   I have no idea what you are getting at with that. “You know ‘text’ for? Oral relativism.”? Can you please explain?

   BTW, many blacks who were freed went out and bought slaves too.

   Shall I add this to the list of reasons you think slavery was okay back then?

7. #107
   On April 17th, 2010 at 8:50 pm, chapoutier said:

   Speaking of moral relativism, how can you pretend to oppose slavery when you support the debt slavery this administration and Congress is imposing on future generations?

   To compare actual slavery with your notion of “debt slavery” is silly and demeaning, don’t you think?

8. #108
   On April 17th, 2010 at 8:54 pm, chapoutier said:

   Chapoutier pretends to oppose slavery, yet he votes for the party of slavery. He votes for the party of Jim Crow laws. He votes for the party who promoted anti-miscegenation. He votes for the party that opposed civil rights. He votes for the party that puts an unsustainable debt for future generations.

   Oh dear oh dear, the silly “Southern Democrat” theory again. Sorry atheling, if that is the best you have then I am afraid your argument falls pretty flat.

9. #109
   On April 17th, 2010 at 8:55 pm, atheling said:

   LOL, you can’t even argue. All you can say is “No it’s not true” without any substantiation. ROFL.

   What a pathetic loser you are.

10. #110
    On April 17th, 2010 at 9:01 pm, chapoutier said:

    Was that a threat of violence, atheling? Does someone need a refresher on the terms of use?

    Also, I don’t need to prove the notion that southern democrats were not liberal progressives. It is on its face fact. We are glad we rid our party of them.

11. #111
    On April 17th, 2010 at 9:48 pm, chapoutier said:

    And I hope that you drink too much wine and vomit in your sleep and choke on it.

    Do you need some advice on wine?