The cartoon jihadists never forget
In August 2007, I blogged about this little cartoon depicting Mohammed as a dog:
The religion of perpetual outrage swung into action against the Swedish artist who drew the image, Lars Vilks.
Vilks hit the nail on the head at the time:
Vilks said he made the drawings after being invited to contribute to an art exhibition in central Sweden on the theme of dogs.
“To begin with, the message was to make a critical contribution on the dog theme, but it took another direction,” Vilks told AP in a phone interview. “Why can you not criticize Islam when you can criticize other religions?”
Three years later, the cartoon jihadists are still raging against Vilks for speaking truth to sharia power:
A Swedish artist who angered Muslims by depicting the Prophet Muhammad as a dog was assaulted Tuesday while giving a university lecture about the limits of artistic freedom.
Lars Vilks told The Associated Press a man in the front row ran up to him and head-butted him during a lecture, breaking his glasses but leaving him uninjured. It wasn’t immediately clear what happened to the attacker.
Vilks has faced numerous threats over his controversial drawing of Muhammad with a dog’s body, but Tuesday’s incident was the first time he has been physically assaulted.
Earlier this year U.S. investigators said Vilks was the target of an alleged murder plot involving Colleen LaRose, an American woman who dubbed herself “Jihad Jane,” and who now faces life in prison. She had pleaded not guilty.
Allahpundit has the video.
Remember: The Religion of Perpetual Outrage hates all infidels. The targeting of Mohammed cartoonists is a lingering pretext to demonstrate that centuries-old, Koran-inspired hatred. If it isn’t cartoons, it’s always something else. From fresco rage to book rage to film rage to beauty pageant rage to Koran-dropping rage to cartoon rage to Pope rage, to ceramic Mohammed bobbleheads, it never ends.
They never forget and they never forgive. Which is why we must never submit.
Lan astaslem: Arabic for “I will not submit/surrender”
***
Vilks stands firm:
While Vilks escaped the incident with broken glasses and a degree of shock, he said it raised concerns about the freedom of expression at Sweden’s oldest and most prestigious institute of higher learning.
“What you get is a mob deciding what can be discussed at the university,” Vilks told The Associated Press, adding he was ready to repeat the lecture if re-invited.
“I’m ready to go up again,” he said. “This must be carried through. You cannot allow it to be stopped.”
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 |
Pastor Nadarkhani update: Execution order reportedly issued
February 22, 2012 01:13 PM by Michelle Malkin
58 Comments
Obama: All troops out of Iraq by end of year
October 21, 2011 01:00 PM by Michelle Malkin
191 Comments
Arab Fall, Arab Fail: Coptic Christians slaughtered in Egypt; Plus: Nadarkhani update
October 10, 2011 11:34 AM by Michelle Malkin
46 CommentsPastor Nadarkhani update: Bogus charges, renewed call for action
October 4, 2011 11:18 AM by Michelle Malkin
20 Comments
Second U.S. jihadi reportedly killed in drone attack; Plus: Refresher course on American bloggers vs. Samir Khan
September 30, 2011 11:24 AM by Michelle Malkin
92 Comments
Pastor Nadarkhani update: State Department, Boehner weigh in
September 30, 2011 10:46 AM by Michelle Malkin
36 Comments
Dead again? New reports of jihadi cleric Awlaki’s demise; God bless our military
September 30, 2011 10:06 AM by Michelle Malkin
75 Comments
Iranian Pastor Yousef Nadarkhani faces execution for refusing to renounce Christianity: Where are the Hollyweirdos and Euroweenies now?; Update: White House statement; Britain, EU stand up
September 29, 2011 09:30 AM by Michelle Malkin
153 Comments
Categories: Islam
Villainous Company
» Must Read Post of the Day. Possibly, the YearSister Toldjah
» Barack Obama: Can we call him a Socialist now?Redstate
» Daily Links – May 25, 2012Redstate
» #shrug
Muhammed as a dog? HA.
Muslims don’t like dogs?
They murdered Theo van Gogh for far less. Mr. Vilks better watch his back from now on, because the religion of peace never forgets a grudge. Ask Salman Rushdie.
Mohammed as a dog?
I would add murderous dog.
The followers of Islam who carry with them permanent outrage over these “slights”, are no more rational, or part of the civilized world than are hornets. When you stir up their nests, like any other purely instinctive creature lacking reason, they attack. And they need to treated as such. Avoid them if possible. If they attack, defend yourself with lethal force.
Well, dogs are known not to be particular about their diet.
I ain’t sayin’, I’m just sayin’…
Good one. Perhaps rabid dog. Mad dog certainly.
These radicals can only react emotionally, never logically. It’s the way that clerics (who are the governments in most islamic nations) control people. They take illiterate people, infuse them with radical fervor, and send them out in the world. Whenever you have religion and state merging, this is the result. However, not all buy into this radicalism. They flee to have their own lives. The mosques ostrasize them. The end will come when Islam and western civilization come to blows. One will have enough of the other. Armaggeddon.
Let’s play “Find Rage Boy.” I thought I saw him up near the podium at the beginning of the video. Anybody else spot him in the crowd?
Ok, I’m scared of anyone who thinks a depiction of a revered person is the person themself. How do they know that little doodle is Mohammed? WTF? It has as much impact on me as the depictions of ‘Jesus’ with long hair & blue eyes.
Make that murderous, child molesting pervert dog.
Mohammed the mad dog.
It’s disturbing that someone would be so villified for drawing a cartoon….
It’s also pretty disturbing that THIS cartoon is actually considered ‘art’…
Good Lord, I’ve seen better work on the walls of a grade school hallway.
Comparing the “prophet” mohammed to a dog is insulting.
Insulting to the dog that is.
Mohammed the mad dog.
Until you mentioned the merger of religion and state, I was wondering why you were talking about democrats on this post.
If you make enough of a stink, you get your way. The rop type are taking one inch at a time. These people remind me of the way the illegals are going about trying to change the U.S., all they are doing is making us mad! Even that cartoon show that had this rop type head guy had to quit showing this person. The 1st seems not to work for those who have a negative thing to say or draw about this rop type top dog person here any longer.
L
Well, where does a dog go straight for the first time he meets another dog? Or a person, for that matter?
Tom Tancredo agrees.
I say apply “their” laws to him. Execute the attacker.
My dog likes cat poo fresh out of the litter box. I wonder if Moh would find it tasty – right before one of his legendary raping and pillaging adventures?
Hunter, no. The dems are too busy, right now, with the “potty parity act”.
Muslim student admits being for another holocaust.
http://www.breitbart.tv/for-it-muslim-student-in-san-diego-confesses-she-wants-a-second-holocaust/
Liberal jews wake up. The left are not your friends. They are selling you out.
Meanwhile, after caving to the Islamists, courageous Comedy Central is preparing a series on Jesus knowing of course that Christians will make a big stink – jacking their ratings – but will not threaten anyone. The Christian response to this should just be, “Comedy who? Next.”
And for the kiddies – Islamic Rage Boy as “Muzz Lightyear”.
I see the jihadists and the left are using the same playbook. Shame on these universities for letting mobs dictate who gets to speak and who doesn’t.
Man, I would love to find one of those mohammed bobbleheads. No luck so far.
And there it is from swede, with a little editing.
The world knows that civilizations raised via Judeo-Christian values (whether practiced as religion or not) are tolerant and usually do not respond in violence.
Those who disparage Christians, plus much of the world media and many Americans who hate America(“GD America” and “For the first time I’m proud of my country” sic) take total comfort – nestle into the security given them via Judeo – Christian values.
Dogs everywhere howl in dismay!
Heck, 90 % of my doodlings have more artistic merit.
Of course, I haven’t produced my own visual rendering of “Crazy Mo” yet so I doff my tophat, offer a hearty “Skål!” and a petition for divine protection for Herr Vilks!
Peaceful speech and expression should not be threatened with physical violence. It’s good to stand against the threats. It’s good to deny those that make threats a victory. It’s good to dilute the effectiveness of the threats by proliferating the threatened speech.
However, there’s no reason to needlessly insult someone’s religion.
I think efforts should be made to minimize the insults when expressing your views.
It’s possible to describe problems, even inherent problems, with a religion without being needlessly disrespectful.
I think Michelle Malkin does a good job with this.
I think many of you do not.
I’m not suggesting that anyone needs to submit, surrender, roll-over, dance, or silence themselves.
But I think that efforts to refuse submission and surrender will be much more effective if they are done in a less offensive manner.
I’m going to start a website dedicated to mohammad cartoons.
I need some suggestions for the website name.
Corkie, I’m not being a smarta** here, but I have to ask: what about needfully insulting a religion? I mean, one’s eyes should roll at “Xenu”. And Islam (“submit”) has always been – at best – a criminal protection racket from the very start.
All belief systems are not equal.
I agree. I have been wrong. I apologize to any mohamaddens who might have taken offence by any comparisons by me of Mohammed to a mad dog. Even if it is a completely accurate depiction. Even if he and his followers wish to wash the world in blood. Even if Mohammed is a war-mongering child rapist.
May I suggest…
MohToons?
I will continue to insult islam until it ceases to be an international organization that endorses, enables and carries out terrorism and oppression.
I will continue to insult anything I wish… including religion…
After all, if God didn’t have a sense of humor, explain the Dodo Bird… and… the Human Race.
Not sure if he originated it, but I remember George Burns saying “God is a stand up comedian, playing to an audience whose afraid to laugh”…
LOL, remember the line from the running skit of the 90s tv show “In Living Color” – “Mo’ money, mo’ money, mo’ money!” ?
For folks unfamiliar with the aforementioned “Xenu”.
I tried to word my comment very carefully. I wasn’t condemning needfully insulting a religion – if it is, in fact, a needful insult.
I certainly understand that some people are irrationally sensitive, so their definition of insult or offensive may be irrational and therefore ignored.
But I think that needful insults should be carefully scrutinized.
I’m not so sure that Comedy Central caved. To me, the intentionally intrusive “censored” placard imposed over the image of cartoon Mohammed seemed in keeping with the often irreverent mockings of South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone.
OK, but I hope that your insults aren’t needless and don’t degrade the effectiveness of MM’s messages.
“What you get is a mob deciding what can be discussed at the university,”
The USA already has that [growing] problem, and it’s not even coming from outrageously outraged muslims.
Insult Islam? That’s a one way street for Muslims. They feign indignation at any action that they feel maligns their religion and uses that excuse to condemn and threaten but what happens when they do the same?
Maybe when they start showing respect for other religions, respect will be shown to theirs. And by respect, I don’t mean by means of fear and duress.
Here’s what they did to the Christian Church of the Nativity back in 2002.
That being said, one does not fight evil with evil. It’s a pity that theirs is a religion that has Satan as it’s god. Talk about lost sheep. Boy, have they ever been deceived.
Ironic: Islam wants to censor and control the world’s media – and is doing a darn successful job at it, if Comedy Central is any example – yet Hollywood and the US media are fixated with depicting Christianity and Judaism-Israel as violently intolerant, bigoted and racist.
I am doing my part. I met my sister’s lezzie partner back at the beginning of January. Upon discussion with her, I found out that she teaches many muslim students and has ample respect for their religion and culture.
I didn’t stay silent. I asked her what she thought would happen to her if she taught in a muslim country and introduced my sister as her partner to her muslim students, their parents or one of their religious schools she would likely be teaching in. I answered the question for her, telling her that she would likely be fired, harassed, threatened and possibly be the victim of assault and battery.
When I told her that I once stopped being friends with someone when I found out they were of the muslim faith, she couldn’t believe that people like me existed. I replied, there are people much more evil than me, that is what I am trying to tell you regarding the muslims.
Reminds me of Tancredo coming to UNC-Chapel Hill.
I know you are a careful (good sense, not snotty) person, Corkie. I was impressed that you were concerned about your grammar/spelling in a recent comment on some recent topic. Many of us just wing it, grammar be damned. : )
I don’t think that’s unreasonable. And for me – and I suspect some others – it’s more disgust and dismissal than just venting insults. And sometimes we engage in a bit of mockish fun in what you may view as thoughtless insults.
I like to think I’m well versed in comparative religion, though there are certainly those better versed than I. But, at any rate, I do make certain differentiations based on my criteria.
So I believe where we may differ – and I imagine it’s an area where it’s an “agree to disagree” thing – is in what we consider the term “religion” to encompass.
I would think of it as comparing the Hope Diamond to cheap “diamond-like” glass knockoffs sold on QVC, if that makes sense.
It should be a pig body instead.
If you really want to get the muslims rage going, draw a picture of Mohammed having same-sex discretions.
Remember, Iamadinerjacket came to America and stated that Iran doesn’t have any homosexuals.
The best view of an enraged Muslim is through your sight reticle.
Yeah, but up here in the north, we can only carry guns directly to the shooting range and must keep them disassembled when at home.
Such a speech would not be allowed to take place on a college campus in the U.S. We already have seen fearful American university publishing houses refuse to publish books containing the cartoons. As a nation we are already submitting to Islamofacists a little bit at a time.
I heard that there will be a massive Islamic Temple that is going to go up in and around the site of 9/11. Anyone know if that is true?
If that does take place, America will go down a slippery slope to Islamification.
Ahhh, the cult is still upset about the CARTOONS…Makes one wonder if the CARTOONS have turned “MODERATE” MUSLIMS into JIHADISTS, as the BRITISH NEWS BIMBETTE said airport screening is doing today??? Remember, there are many religions in the world, but only one “RELIGION OF PEACE”!!!
Beheadings and other assorted acts of mayhem in the name of one’s god offends me. Free speech does not. People in this forum, and in fact all over the country, are sick of walking on eggshells when it comes to Islam. People are just saying what they think, on the basis of facts. I am not a politician; just a person with no axe to grind, that does however call a spade a spade. If it’s too much for your sensibilities, perhaps a less offensive forum should be in your future.
If Islam does control America one day, look on the bright side.
1. No liberal ideology in politics
2. You won’t have to listen to or watch Brittney spears songs on telivision/radio.
3. Men won’t even have to make an effort in finding a beautiful woman as each man will be assigned his rightful property when he reaches 18.
4. Factory workers will be given an extra number of breaks each day in order to worship Allah.
5. All Divorce initiated by woman will come to an end.
6. Family Court backlogs would be reduced as the only thing that men have to do to end a marriage is say “I divorce you” three times.
7. The number of Starbucks will quickly dwindle as socializing between the sexes unaccompanied by a chaperone will be forbidden.
8. Credit card companies will have to forgive all outstanding debts as interest charges is seen as evil and unislamic.
9. You won’t be inundated with annoying celebrity ads pushing the promise of weight watchers and Jenny Craig programs as all woman will be forced to wear full burqas.
10. Men will never have to hear their wives brag about their better sense of direction since women won’t be aloud to drive and therefore will have no knowledge of said direction with which to boast.
Interesting that the left so ardently supports and apologizes for violent, oppressive Islam when the religion embodies the antithesis of every do gooder liberal mantra and program the left has forced on this country.
Does liberalism accept the human rights violation of brutally removing a young girls private parts in order to make them slaves?
Not even close.
I’m not offended by any of the insults at all. I just think many of them, not all, are counterproductive.
This is a very reasonable approach.
But I don’t think pig jokes are made “on the basis of the facts.” And I don’t think sexual jokes are calling a spake a spade.
I never suggested that you walk on eggshells. I’ve specifically stated that irrational sensitivities should be ignored.
I merely suggested that you don’t trample on someone’s religion needlessly and that you carefully scrutinize the need to trample.
I sympathize with the above, sbw, but on this:
Corkie is just expressing her opinion and she makes a good point about ignorant rantings clouding real issues.
Besides if you are honest about “Free speech” not offending you, then you should be able to handle a person exercising her free speech. If you cannot handle it, wouldn’t it be a more correct observation that you are in need of some place that is not too hard on “your sensibilities”? It works both ways or not at all – gander/goose.
I remember my sister’s friend, who was muslim. When this friend went to school, she had to cover all her hair and was forbidden to wear make-up. She also was not allowed to talk to boys.
Now, she was absolutely beautiful. I mean hotter than volcanic lava and everybody was fond of her as peoople generally want to interact with more attractive people.
Anyway, as soon as she got to school, she would let her hair down, put on make-up, change into a sexy outfit etc. When her brother started to attend her school in 9th grade, if he was in disagreement with his sister over something unrelated and felt motivated to do so, he would tell her father about her behaviour. Many times she would refuse to go home and stay with a friend for fear of the beatings she knew she would receive from the fallout.
Funny thing though, her brother could basically do whatever he wanted to without consequence. I guess that’s because he was born with different anatomy – you know how that works with Islam.
Speakup, they avoid criticizing groups like this in the hopes that , to borrow an often used quote, “They’ll be eaten last”.
In other words, they are simply cowards.
They only attack those that they know they are safe from. Such as our military, the catholic church, etc. But they would not dare engage in the same protests on the streets of Iran, Pakistan or Afghanistan.
They also don’t target countries like China and everyone knows why. The Chinese would go in and bomb them until there were no muslims left.
I think it’s only partly that, NJ-A, but I believe most of it is due to the extremely naive, kumbaya view of the world to which most liberals adhere.
The scuttlebut is that the Russians wrap the bodies of Islamic terrorists in pigskin – thus preventing them from entering Paradise, getting the virgins and all.
I like it as SOP.
I wish I could get a job punishing muslim terrorist once caught. There are all sorts of things I would like to do to them. I don’t speak Russian though. Of course I do speak Islam: no virgins for you, your father is gay, your half brother is a goat, your mom was a hooker etc.
On a related note, did you notice how there has been very little outrage with Russia executing the Somali pirates who tried to hold that Russian ship. Proves your point NJ and purplepeep. Weaknesses is not a strategy. Someone should tell the Con-man-in-Chief.
Strangely, Somali pirates will soon stop attacking ships with cyrillic names.
Yes, I would agree.
and that’s just the women.
If anyone here sells a T-shirt with caninemohammed I will order a dozen, various sizes.
” “I will not submit/surrender”” but being a good sport I will give them a five second lead-generous type I am.
===
Let your sidearm be like Master Card: Don’t Leave home without it.
An Armed Society is a polite society.
When somebody (as I interpreted it) is telling other people not to say something because they find it objectionable or offensive on this forum, then it makes sense to suggest that they go someplace where people stating what is on their minds cannot offend them. I didn’t tell her that she had no right to state it here or anyplace else. But there is an obvious difference between saying: “Islam is a violent religion” versus “dont say that Islam is a violent religion because that is offensive”. Both are free speech, but the second seeks to curtail the first person from exercising it. But this is much ado over..well not much. Perhaps I misunderstood Corkie. She explained herself very well in her responsive post.
It seems as if you now understand that I wasn’t saying the latter.
But do not forget:
The Perpetually Peeved don’t want to go somewhere else-they want you do agree with them; not agreeing with the Perpetually Peeved is Hate Speech.
===
An Armed Society is a polite society.
And except for the manditory religious footwashing fettish – you don’t have to worry about hygene EVER!!!
If I were mega-wealthy, I’d anonymously hire a starving artist to do a rendering of Mohammed in a Big Jar of Urine.
I would then DEMAND that the National Endowment for the Arts provide a GRANT so that the finished piece would be displayed in a gallery at the New York Museum of Fine Arts.
After allowing enough time for all the limp-noodled excuses, weasal words, and media frothing to die down, I would then purchase a full page in the NY Times, presenting the blatant double-standard of liberal elitists everywhere.
Yeah, I think perhaps you might have read a bit more into what Corkie wrote than what she intended.
I believe she was referring more to hateful uniformed, ignorant rants.
For example: “Mohammed was a pedophile”. It is correct that one of his wives was young, 9-10 years of age. In that time, there was no “age of consent” or marriage laws; females were pretty much chattel. i.e. Solomon had at least 1,000 concubines ( a harem) – although the ages of this multitude of girls is unknown, it was common for young girls to be given in marriage or as girls “on the side”. Yet Solomon is revered as a wise and great man. This carries over to the New Testament era; Mary was likely 13 or 14 when she gave birth to Jesus.
I have no qualms in saying “Mo” was a disgusting thug who invented a “religion” based on a bastardization of Hebrew & Christian scripture mixed with myths of a regional desert moon deity, but folks really don’t need to embellish things to make him more awful. It would be like saying Hitler enjoyed eating Jewish babies – the objective, historical truths are awful enough.
Yes, and what better than a Government run Ministry of Truth to protect the proletariat from hateful uniformed, ignorant rants! Only useful, helpful Government Ministry of Truth information will be allowed. Your government will protect you from hateful uniformed, ignorant rants and it does not matter how many of us they have to kill to do so. Private lives as is private property is not conducive to the collective.
Bill Ayres was more prophet than fool.
===
Let your sidearm be like Master Card:
Don’t Leave home without it.
Of course, I shall take you at your word.
Evidently they do. I read on the American Thinker on Monday that the AAP (American Assoc. of Pediatrics) is condoning a “nick” version of this to appease the camel jockies who are already here.
Somehow I don’t imagine Corkie is the “Minister” of any government agency, AZN.
Also, if one actually believes that an uniformed, ignorant tirade = fact, then Tea Party folks have a whole lot of things to work on – racism, McVeigh-ism, xenophobia, violence and so on.
*Don’t worry, I will never submit to their dog squeeze prophet, or their 7th century invented religion of death cult savages; It will probably take a gigantic catastrophe(the Middle East will likely be the epicenter) for people to finally realize there is no compatability between this invented religion from a throwback era and the civilized world in total; No how, no way, never; Believe it or suffer immensely!
Muslims are the violent Nomads.
Israel, Europe, America, Middle East, Pakistan, India, Indonesia, Russian-Chechnya, Thailand (a predominantly Buddhist country),…if there is a religious violence anywhere in the world, you can bet that it involves Muslims.
Almost always, the Muslims are the aggressors.
Obama can not see the Muslim problem because he himself is born Muslim (and No, he has not converted to Christianity. Sitting in Wright’s church was an act of political expediency). Even in his own books – supposedly written by himself – his sympathies and admiration for his father (a Muslim) are abundantly more than for his white mother (a Christian).
Liberal Left – the media and Hollywood – sees the problem, but they are afraid of their own lives.
The Muslim scholars (if there are any) are phonies: very quick to condemn Muslim profiling, but nowhere to be seen when their fanatic wing carry out violent acts.
The solution to the Muslim menace is: Many more Vilks.
These nomads will not change their behavior unless dealt with aggressive push back.
Counter violence may not be the best answer.
Appeasement is definitely not the answer.
Turn in your iPods and Blackberrys and computers – Obama thinks they are dangerous. To his career maybe. BTW, the liar in chief claims he doesn’t know how to operate them, even though he’s a Crackberry addict and avid iPod user.
There is an old Marvel comic, I think, which depicts Mohammed in it also.
It is from the early 70s, should Stan Lee and the art team be worried.
Or is their hatred not retroactive?
I am sick of Muslim indignation. They kill and kill and kill and kill then whine when someone has the guts to ridicule them.
Dear Muslim brothers, I am a Christian and I will never submit.
I would be willing to defend, to the death, your right to do this.
But I don’t think you should based on what you’ve written.
Perhaps surprising though, I do support the recent efforts of the South Park producers. Failure to poke fun at Islam ruins their credibility to poke fun at other religions – which makes their show less funny – which threatens their product.
I don’t necessarily think someone should make a living poking fun at religions, but it’s irrational for anyone to be significantly offended by equal opportunity chaffing.
So: 1) I think there is a difference between South Park jest and artistic expressions which submerge religious symbols in urine; and 2) I would be less inclined to discourage your proposed action if you have already funded projects which disrespect other religious symbols (since selective omission of disrespect can be construed as respect).
UHHH, As to Muslims avoiding China; China does have Muslim problems periodically. They are called Uighurs, and China’s Central Government handles them just like they do any other desenter; Execution.
Its amazing how flexible or non existent really, the Karl Marx progeny’s principles are, they show us how little they revere our Constitution, to treat what’s written in stone as no better than liberal silly putty.
Allah is one of 360 false gods at the kabba. He was known as the moon god. Notice the moon on Mosques.
Mohammad enjoyed murder, and rape. Those who follow Mohammad are called extremists. The true extremists within Islam are the peaceful ones. They are called Apostates.
For jihadists, any scape goat excuse will do to cover for their true motivation… the Koran itself.
Question: When did unprovoked Muslim terrorism against the U.S.A. begin?
Answer: Before our first President even took office.
Lan astaslem
“For jihadists, any scape goat excuse will do to cover for their true motivation… the Koran itself.”
Sorry Redpill, but I just have to correct you. You comment should read
For jihadists, any goat will do.
If there are supposed to be no pictures of Mohammed. How in the world do they know the face on the dog was him?
Looks like most of the Muslims you see walking around in Afganistan to me.
Make offensive statements about Jesus of Nazareth and Christians will get upset and pray for you.
Make offensive statemtns about Mohamed and Muslims will get upset and hunt you down and murder you in the streets.
Remind me again why leftists hate and revile Christians and pander to Muslims?
The hold that Islam has on Muslims is mystifying.
I published a book by and Iranian woman who fled to Canada to escape a death sentence for speaking out against the Iranian theocracy.
This woman has had a terrible life; youngest child of her father’s two families, survived the revolution and Iran/Iraq war at ground level in the war zone, raped at 12 by her 20 year old brother, kidnapped from street by secret police, jumped from speeding car, hid among chador clad female students at university while sympathetic teacher and embassy personnell secured visa for her to fly to France, train to Amsterdam where she acquired black market documents that enabled her to fly to Canada where she sought asylum and eventual citizenship.
She relocated to Washington, DC and has become a leading expatriate opponent of the Iranian theocracy,has appeared on every national TV and radio show, is a consultant to Congress and Senate on Islam and Middle East politics and culture.
Devout Muslim, made Haji at 14, no longer wears chador or scarf but follows prescribed diet and prayers.
This is an intelligent, educated, multi-lingual woman who receives death threats from Iranian hardliners for publicly denouncing Islamic terrorists. She is a good person in every way.
The mystery is: Although she does not maintain the murderous and perverted acts ascribed to Mohammed would be acceptable today, she still worships him and, by tortured reasoning, trys to explain and justify them in the context of their time.
Yes, and when we caught one on the battlefield fighting Americans, he told the CIA he had gone to Tora Bora “looking for work” which was enough for the lefties to claim that he shouldn’t be sent back to the Chinese…
I can arrange that I think …
I’m sure I’d have to get the artist’s permission first, but please swing by my blog and let me know if you are serious. I could get on this pretty nicely …
HAHAHA
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
I think the recent event at the lecture conducted by David Horowitz deserves a little play time…
On May 13th, 2010 at 12:04 am, feebiebabe said:
Indeed. But which side would be accused of “hate speech” by the Obama administration?