Final Space Shuttle Launch

By Doug Powers  •  May 14, 2010 01:00 PM

As a high school freshman, I remember watching the launch of the first shuttle, Columbia, in 1981.

Today is the swan song for the shuttle program:

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. – NASA has cleared the space shuttle Atlantis for its final planned launch on Friday afternoon as the U.S. space agency prepares to retire its aging three-shuttle fleet later this year.

Atlantis and a crew of six astronauts are poised to launch toward the International Space Station in what will be the 25-year-old shuttle’s 32nd and last planned spaceflight. Liftoff is set for Friday at 2:20 p.m. EDT (1820 GMT) from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center.

The president, as you know, announced that he’ll soon be dramatically retooling the space program in order to focus on achieving the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of landing a man on Elena Kagan.

You can watch the launch live here. Liftoff is scheduled for 2:20 p.m. Godspeed to all on board!

Update: As some commenters have pointed out, this is the third-to-last shuttle flight overall, but the last for Atlantis.

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Fun

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:05 pm, TigerLady said:

    Retooling of our space shuttle program by a tool.

  2. #2
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:08 pm, verogolfer said:

    Yes, a swan song for the space shuttle. The Obama Administration may be a swan song for the nation. Or at least for fiscal responsibility.

  3. #3
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:09 pm, verogolfer said:

    Tigerlady, the space shuttle program retooled by a tool or a fool? Suppose either one works

  4. #4
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:09 pm, tonyr951 said:

    As a high school freshman

    I remember the same as a high school senior.

    I also remember that knot in my stomach when hearing the Challenger news on the radio while driving to work……..at Morton Thiokol.

  5. #5
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:10 pm, Valiant said:

    The president, as you know, announced that he’d be dramatically retooling the space program in order to focus on achieving the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan.

    Excellent.

  6. #6
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:11 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    The president, as you know, announced that he’d be dramatically retooling the space program in order to focus on achieving the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan.

    So blindfolds will now be part of the flightsuit?

  7. #7
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:12 pm, letget said:

    The last I heard there might be a problem with low clouds, I hope things have cleared up. Yes, indeed, God’s speed.
    L

  8. #8
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:15 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    What are htey going to replace it with, a solar powered Yugo?!

  9. #9
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:16 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    htey = they (slap!)

  10. #10
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:22 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan

    I tend to suspect that will NEVER happen.

  11. #11
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:24 pm, backwoods conservative said:

    The way I understand it, this is only the final flight of that particular shuttle. There are still two more in the fleet, both of which are scheduled to be retired by the end of the year.

  12. #12
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:24 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    As a high school freshman, I remember watching the launch of the first shuttle, Columbia, in 1981.

    Hard to believe all you puppies weren’t glued to the B&W TV to see Armstrong and Aldrin on the moon. Stunning. Now instead of exploring the Universe we make up climate myths.

  13. #13
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:26 pm, Brian72 said:

    The president, as you know, announced that he’d be dramatically retooling the space program in order to focus on achieving the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan.

    Houston, we have a problem.

    And you thought Apollo 13 was an impossible mission!

  14. #14
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:29 pm, rfjjulie said:

    Yes, God’s Speed.

    Too bad we now have to pay the Russian’s to take us to the Space Station. Smart Power, pfft.

  15. #15
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:32 pm, rfjjulie said:

    Aloha-

    glued to the B&W TV to see Armstrong and Aldrin on the moon

    I remember that as a kid. At the time, that was the coolest thing ever! That was when Americans thought they could do anything. How pathetically far we have come.

  16. #16
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:32 pm, Hangfire said:

    I remember the Captain reading the radio message over the 1MC, saying that the Columbia had taken off and was in a safe orbit. You could hear the cheers from the torpedo room all the way back to the shaft.

    It was exciting to be American back in those days. Hopefully we’ll feel the same way after Barry Soetoro finishes his one term, just like Jimmah Codder.

  17. #17
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:32 pm, stillontheroad said:

    A little history, I was on the first rev support for the first Shuttle Launch and it was one of the busiest and most rewarding things I have ever done. Now I am looking at a shell of our once great Space Program and am just plain sick in my stomach.

  18. #18
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:33 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    …the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan.

    LOL…. awesome.

    Dennis Miller’s gonna be P.O.’ed that he didn’t come up with that one first.

  19. #19
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:36 pm, TigerLady said:

    verogolfer said:

    either works for me. He’s a fool for believing his radical beliefs but he’s a tool for acting on them. His goal is the destruction of our country.

  20. #20
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:38 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan.

    Definitely the Wrong Stuff.

  21. #21
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:42 pm, Hangfire said:

    …the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan.

    Where do you place the flag?

  22. #22
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:44 pm, granite said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:32 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Now I am looking at a shell of our once great Space Program and am just plain sick in my stomach.

    You are not alone.

  23. #23
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:49 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    Hope the astronauts get there and back safely. But the Americans should be embarrassed by the shuttle.

    It was sold as a easy way to space. Inexpensive, reusable, quick turn around back to regular scheduled flights into space.

    Basically it is a flying bus on a controlled explosion. The iphone has more technology than the space shuttle.

    We should have already come up with a much better alternative. How about a mag-lev gun that catapults a spaceship into space instead of an explosion? Space elevator would be great and safe.

    No, we are still primitive with the space shuttle. Time for the next generation of spacecraft. good riddance to the shuttle.

  24. #24
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:56 pm, love2rumba said:

    The president, as you know, announced that he’d be dramatically retooling the space program in order to focus on achieving the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan.

    Talk about going Where No Man Has Gone Before…

  25. #25
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:59 pm, GJCorby said:

    The president, as you know, announced that he’d be dramatically retooling the space program in order to focus on achieving the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan.

    There are some place man was not ment to go.

  26. #26
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:00 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:38 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan.
    Definitely the Wrong Stuff.

    Not even Chuck Yeager could tame that wild ride! :shock:

  27. #27
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:01 pm, GJCorby said:

    CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. – NASA has cleared the space shuttle Atlantis for its final planned launch on Friday afternoon as the U.S. space agency prepares to retire its aging three-shuttle fleet later this year.

    In an unrelated story China announced that later this year it will start construction of a permamently manned base on the moon complete with nuclear weapons (for research puropses ofcourse)

  28. #28
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:03 pm, Hangfire said:

    Perhaps Kagan’s face lost a few tiles during the last re-entry…..

  29. #29
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:04 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    On a serious note, the Obama administrations willingness to just drop the Shuttle program with no plans to develop a newer more versatile vehicle is just plain dumb. He talks about Mars as a ruse. He has no plans to follow through on any space program. His plan is to do nothing and let other countries lead in space exploration. He on the other hand has other plans for our money…. that involve the SEIU and others.

    Try to get your kids to watch the launch. Or DVR it for them. There won’t be another if the libs have their way.

  30. #30
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:15 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Minor correction:
    It is the final launch for Atlantis, but there are two more “final launches” yet to come… one each for Discovery and Endeavour…

    Atlantis’ upcoming flight is the first of three final space shuttle missions – one for each of NASA’s remaining orbiters – scheduled before the reusable space plane fleet is retired. The shuttles Discovery and Endeavour are slated to make their final flights in September and November, respectively.

  31. #31
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:31 pm, PatriotRider said:

    Well Doug, that augered in pretty fast. Putting a man on Kegan indeed. Next you’ll tell us that Helen Thomas is a babe.

  32. #32
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:36 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:49 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    Hope the astronauts get there and back safely. But the Americans should be embarrassed by the shuttle.

    It was sold as a easy way to space. Inexpensive, reusable, quick turn around back to regular scheduled flights into space.

    I’m always interested in how something was “sold” versus comparing that to the “actual results”. Both in technology projects and in government programs, of which the Shuttle program is both.

    Basically it is a flying bus on a controlled explosion. The iphone has more technology than the space shuttle.

    Yes, but the quality of that technology, at least in terms of the software, is very, very high:

    The right stuff is the software. The software gives the orders to gimbal the main engines, executing the dramatic belly roll the shuttle does soon after it clears the tower. The software throttles the engines to make sure the craft doesn’t accelerate too fast. It keeps track of where the shuttle is, orders the solid rocket boosters to fall away, makes minor course corrections, and after about 10 minutes, directs the shuttle into orbit more than 100 miles up. When the software is satisfied with the shuttle’s position in space, it orders the main engines to shut down — weightlessness begins and everything starts to float.

    But how much work the software does is not what makes it remarkable. What makes it remarkable is how well the software works. This software never crashes. It never needs to be re-booted. This software is bug-free. It is perfect, as perfect as human beings have achieved. Consider these stats : the last three versions of the program — each 420,000 lines long-had just one error each. The last 11 versions of this software had a total of 17 errors. Commercial programs of equivalent complexity would have 5,000 errors.

    You continue:

    We should have already come up with a much better alternative. How about a mag-lev gun that catapults a spaceship into space instead of an explosion? Space elevator would be great and safe.

    I think a SpaceShipOne is a wise design, using a regular aircraft to get to a certain altitude, thus lessening the amount of rocket power necessary to reach orbit.

    No, we are still primitive with the space shuttle. Time for the next generation of spacecraft. good riddance to the shuttle.

    Even with the loss of 14 lives and two orbiters to catastophic failures, it’s still hard to say goodbye to the shuttle program.

  33. #33
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:39 pm, RedDog said:

    Obamas mission is to drive America into Marxist oblivion. Our mission is to stop him and his army of imps.

  34. #34
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:39 pm, Hangfire said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:31 pm, PatriotRider said:
    Next you’ll tell us that Helen Thomas is a babe.

    She was a babe, until Zeus punished her for the sin of pride.

  35. #35
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:40 pm, dcbprime said:

    Thacker makes a good point. These shuttles ought to be superseded, not just retired.

    BTW, I’m hoping that the National Museum of the United States Air Force gets one of the retired shuttles. It’ll be great to show the kids how awesome things were, and maybe inspire them to how awesome they can be again, unless the “progressives” ruin everything like they want to.

    /Gratuitous plug for the National Museum in Dayton, Ohio. Come visit it soon. :-)

  36. #36
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:42 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    It’s the last launch of Atlantis, but there are 3 more launches scheduled. Endeavor is scheduled to be the last, in November.

    It’s the end of an era, but let the private market take over. It’ll be cheaper and more efficient.

  37. #37
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:44 pm, graysonret said:

    I’m showing my age, but I remember Al Shepard’s flight, in school. In those days, class could be interrupted to show any important event. I threw some paper up in a cheer and it cost me detention that afternoon. These days, there isn’t anything in space to tax or rule, so Obama isn’t interested. Meanwhile China will soon be looking down on us.

  38. #38
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:52 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

    the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan.

    Hey! MM said to “behave!” :-o

  39. #39
    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:56 pm, Hangfire said:

    “Release the Kagan.”

  40. #40
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:02 pm, Gorebot said:

    Sorry to say I’m with the naysayers on one critical point, which is: The Space Shuttle, although a marvel of engineering, has always been an albatross from a macro-level design standpoint.

    When you have a fleet of aircraft with a 40% failure rate (5 shuttles, 2 of which ended in multiple-fatality disasters), you’ve got a problem.

    At it’s core, the essential problem is this: Given the immutable laws of physics, and the limits of materials technology, it is fool’s errand to lauch both people and their stuff from the same vehicle from ground zero.

    What should have been developed from the start is a system to two separate vehicle-types:

    One small and nimble and exceedingly safe, for transporting only the humans; and, the other a monster mega-ship for separately lifting up all their stuff.

    The smaller vehicle would thus have a much faster turnaround time (especially valuable for emergency situations). And, the larger freight vehicle, being free from the burdon of carrying people, could be truly massive (and thus more efficient).

    Yes, docking a large un-manned freighter in space, and enabling it to return to earth in a recoverable and re-usable way, would be a challenge, but it could’ve been done.

  41. #41
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:12 pm, swede said:

    the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan.

    Well, now I’m confused. I thought manned space flight was about “slipping the surley bonds of earth…and touching the face of God!” Landing on Kagan would be a difficult feat, but seems somewhat less inspiring, no?

  42. #42
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:15 pm, jamesgreenidge said:

    My uncle, Ernest Dishman, was one of the very few black engineers out the ialand at Grumman working on the LEM during Apollo and he once related how Boeing was looking for people to work on the X-20 DynaSoar’s proposed booster spaceplane (in place of Titan) subcontract which was nipped in the bud by McCanara (?), but before he passed he howled not only that DynaSoar was canceled (which also killed having a space shuttle in the mid-sixties), but how X-20 project designers were miffed that North American didn’t even bother to glean their data and propriety non-tile heat shield system. It was a non-lesson learning “not built by us” attitude that had fatal consequences. The same bad judgement was used when they literally destroyed(!) all the blueprints of the Saturn V so to placate North American that there’d be no shuttle alternative — a motion we are now learning was a bad way to go, since we’re spending a fortune recreating the wheel — er, a quasi-Saturn V in Constellation — and Constellation is STILL an old dog! It wasn’t NASA’s fault — it was always a pennywise pound-foolish Congress who have a fifth-grade science quotient. Another thing Ernest always felt NASA PR and public relations should’ve been run by Cronkite and Arthur Clarke. A few minutes ago Fox had a astronaut guest on to talk about Atlantis’s launch alnd all he could talk about how thrilling a ride it was. HELLO! You gotta explain/justify a launch on more than just on giving a few people a good ride! You got to explain the science and biomed and physics experiments and potential that makes all worth the risk! When I was on the beach watching (well it was a foggy day) the last Saturn V – Skylab go up, a lot of the spectators didn’t even understand what Skylab was about! One guy said to me — I swear — “er, yea, well thery can take showers in space now”! Way to go with public education NASA!

    Well, let’s hope Atlantis finds a friendly final berth when she lands, like maybe NYC!

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  43. #43
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:19 pm, swede said:

    The new Obowma PC space program. Large Leftwing Lunar Ladies! Michelle O! – “Spud Butnik”

  44. #44
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:23 pm, rightwingmom said:

    Gives new meaning to, “The Eagle has landed.”

  45. #45
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:25 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    Every time I see a launch it brings back great memories and one bad one. I was lucky to be stationed at Edwards AFB and saw the following:

    First time they mated the 747 and Shuttle and ran it down the runway. First flight of the 747/Shuttle. First time they separated the shuttle from the 747 and landed the shuttle. First time it came back from space at Edwards. Sadly I was on duty at Buckley when the shuttle was lost shortly after launch. Still brings chills watching it go up and return!

  46. #46
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:29 pm, rightwingmom said:

    EJECT…EJECT…EJECT!!!

  47. #47
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:32 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 2:31 pm, PatriotRider said:
    Well Doug, that augered in pretty fast. Putting a man on Kegan indeed. Next you’ll tell us that Helen Thomas is a babe.

    Garth Algar: Sometimes I wish I could boldly go where no man has gone before… but I’ll probably stay in Aurora. What are you thinking about?
    Wayne Campbell: Helen. She’s a fox. In French she would be called “la renarde” and she would be hunted with only her cunning to protect her.
    Garth Algar: She’s a babe.
    Wayne Campbell: She’s a robo-babe. In Latin she would be called “babia majora”.
    Garth Algar: If she were a president she would be Baberaham Lincoln.
    [a brief pause]
    Garth Algar: Did you ever find Bugs Bunny attractive when he put on a dress and played girl bunny?
    Wayne Campbell: No.
    [cracks up laughing]
    Wayne Campbell: No.
    Garth Algar: Neither did I. I was just asking.

  48. #48
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:33 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:23 pm, rightwingmom said:
    Gives new meaning to, “The Eagle has landed.”

    In Kagan’s case it would be “The Beagle has landed!”

  49. #49
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:33 pm, mattm said:

    Obama hates the current space program because it is one of those thing, no matte how many times you see it, you are amazed what we can do and learn. This creates a level of pride in America. Obama hates America.

  50. #50
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:36 pm, SpeakEasy said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:22 pm, Dexter Alarius said:
    the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of putting a man on Elena Kagan
    I tend to suspect that will NEVER happen.

    Not so fast, Bill Clinton is still alive.

  51. #51
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:44 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:36 pm, SpeakEasy said:
    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:22 pm, Dexter Alarius said:
    Not so fast, Bill Clinton is still alive.

    Yeah, but is Little Willie Lump Lump still alive?

  52. #52
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:44 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    The space shuttle is a perfect metaphor for everything wrong with NASA and the US government.

    The shuttle program was supposed to be cheaper, safer and allow for a fast turn around and more launches. In the end, it was more expensive, we lost more astronauts than in any other program, and turn around was horrifically slow. And now we have no alternative for heavy lift.

    I suggest they turn the space program over to the DMZ. They aren’t faster but at least I have never died while trying to get my drivers license renewed…

  53. #53
    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:48 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:44 pm, WarEagle82 said:
    I suggest they turn the space program over to the DMZ. They aren’t faster but at least I have never died while trying to get my drivers license renewed…

    Are you kidding? Do you know how many people have died of old age waiting at the DMV?

  54. #54
    On May 14th, 2010 at 4:01 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Yeah, but ultimately that reduced carbon emissions and overpopulation plus I think it was by design just showing how DMV is better than NASA…

    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:48 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:44 pm, WarEagle82 said:
    I suggest they turn the space program over to the DMZ. They aren’t faster but at least I have never died while trying to get my drivers license renewed…

    Are you kidding? Do you know how many people have died of old age waiting at the DMV?

  55. #55
    On May 14th, 2010 at 4:10 pm, Papa Louie said:

    While this is the final launch of Atlantis, it is not the final shuttle launch. According to the link provided above, there are two more scheduled:

    “The shuttles Discovery and Endeavour are slated to make their final flights in September and November, respectively.”

  56. #56
    On May 14th, 2010 at 4:14 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Obama’s space program is to use a big rubber band to shoot payloads into space.

    In a surprise announcement Eric Holder has not read the plan and nobody knows if Elena Kagan has a position on the program…

  57. #57
    On May 14th, 2010 at 4:21 pm, graysonret said:

    I was hoping, while I was still alive, to see a base on the moon. But the more I thought about it, the more I realized that it wouldn’t be long before the base would be swarming with illegals, cooking and cleaning everything.

  58. #58
    On May 14th, 2010 at 4:31 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:33 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 3:23 pm, rightwingmom said:
    Gives new meaning to, “The Eagle has landed.”

    In Kagan’s case it would be “The Beagle has landed!”

    no offense to Beagle’s intended??

  59. #59
    On May 14th, 2010 at 4:50 pm, prendad said:

    I remember enjoying listening-in on the launches of the space shuttle while flying long Patrol missions in the Navy. I was very proud of our astronauts. It is sad to see the shuttle program end with, apparently, nothing to take it’s place. What a shame. I guess it is part of the administration’s plan to cancel anything and everything that might instill pride in American’s hearts.
    Mars is out there waiting. We should have been there a long time ago.

  60. #60
    On May 14th, 2010 at 4:53 pm, stillontheroad said:

    prendad said:
    P3 or ARIA

  61. #61
    On May 14th, 2010 at 4:55 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    ITookTheRedPill said:

    Minor correction:
    It is the final launch for Atlantis

    yes, the last launch for Atlantis. The program gets moth-balled in October.

    To Gorebot’s point, yes. This has been a risky endeavor. One where the risks came to be realized in the worst possible way. But I suspect if you ask the shuttle astronauts whether they would have prefer to not have the program, or have it with these risks, they’d probably choose the latter.

    That said, and this may be more to your point, is that a different program needed to be developed. One possibly as your described where the risks for human life was lessened significantly.

    One point I would dispute though. I would not put the failure rate at 40%. You have to look at missions flown vs missions completed safely. 130/132 to date? That’s a success rate of about 98.5%. Pretty damn good for a feat like the shuttle program. Though I agree we could have and should have done better.

    Alas our clueless president rather than inspire America (at a time where inspiration would be a very good thing) he says…. done. No pride or inspiration in his White House.

    My 13 yr old son was crushed to learn that this was it. As of this year, the manned space program is all but dead for the US.

    I certainly hope our next president has the vision to inspire a nation.

    The more this one does, the more I think he is our enemy.

  62. #62
    On May 14th, 2010 at 5:15 pm, Hangfire said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 4:50 pm, prendad said:
    I remember enjoying listening-in on the launches of the space shuttle while flying long Patrol missions in the Navy.

    Oh, you’re the guy that would make us go up to periscope depth and raise all our masts so that you could locate us.

  63. #63
    On May 14th, 2010 at 5:24 pm, greenfairie said:

    I remember the very first shuttle flight in 1981. Woke up very early to see it lift off, saw it land during class at school.

    Both NASA and the private sector should have been working on the next generation of spacecraft years ago but I just think there’s little motivation about space exploration anymore. People don’t see the value in it like they did in the ’60s. Now we have an administration that is cutting NASA’s budget so it can bail out a failing socialist country. Bleah.

  64. #64
    On May 14th, 2010 at 5:29 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 5:15 pm, Hangfire said:

    Oh, you’re the guy that would make us go up to periscope depth and raise all our masts so that you could locate us.

    Oh, you’re the guys we had to drop old out-of-date gallon cans of food over the side to see if we could ping something off you, because we couldnt locate you. Then you’d would pop flares at us to show we were dead…. made us want to swim over there and sink you by hand…

  65. #65
    On May 14th, 2010 at 5:34 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    They would roll a cart with the TV on it into our classroom for us to watch the shuttle launches/landings. I always thought the shuttle would crash during landing in the early days – not when it was up in the air.

    The morning Challenger exploded is the only day in 12 years I ever skipped a real day of school.

  66. #66
    On May 14th, 2010 at 5:43 pm, Hangfire said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 5:29 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:
    made us want to swim over there and sink you by hand.

    That’s submerge, not sink, you S.P.

  67. #67
    On May 14th, 2010 at 6:38 pm, 123upnorth said:

    Doug, Doug, Doug, Doug – you are the man!!

    I am hugely fond of MM as I think she is the best woman on the face of the earth, but when it comes to conservative political blog commentators, I like variety more than Perez Hilton at the VIP lounge of his favourite gay strip club.

    Thanks for making me laugh today with your excellent post.

  68. #68
    On May 14th, 2010 at 6:42 pm, 123upnorth said:

    As for putting a man on Elena Kagan, are you going start giving odds are either outcome?

  69. #69
    On May 14th, 2010 at 7:01 pm, Hangfire said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 6:42 pm, 123upnorth said:
    As for putting a man on Elena Kagan, are you going start giving odds are either outcome?

    Are we talking gender re-assignment surgery or missionary position here?

  70. #70
    On May 14th, 2010 at 7:08 pm, 123upnorth said:

    No one would agree to partake in missionary position with Kagan – it would have to be done in the same way in which man’s best friend does it. But unlike dogs, a bottle of Jack Daniels coupled with an anti-nauseant would be a must.

    MM, please don’t kick me off for that comment. I still did refrain myself from what I wanted to type.

  71. #71
    On May 14th, 2010 at 7:12 pm, 123upnorth said:

    Truthfully, despite what I write regarding Kagan’s lack of beauty, I really don’t dislike ugly people. I myself belong to that group and it is we ugly people that give attractive people an asset that they can use. However, Kagan’s support of all things liberal, including communism, is what makes me want to mock her for everything and anything.

  72. #72
    On May 14th, 2010 at 7:37 pm, Hangfire said:

    Well said,123upnorth.

    I, too, am not too easy on the eyes.

    My comments are gender related. She may not be butch, but she wears the uniform.

  73. #73
    On May 14th, 2010 at 7:39 pm, prendad said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 4:53 pm, stillontheroad said:
    prendad said:
    P3 or ARIA

    P-3, VP-23, VP-46.

    On May 14th, 2010 at 5:15 pm, Hangfire said:
    Oh, you’re the guy that would make us go up to periscope depth and raise all our masts so that you could locate us.

    HA! Found you again!

    On May 14th, 2010 at 5:29 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:
    Oh, you’re the guys we had to drop old out-of-date gallon cans of food over the side to see if we could ping something off you. . .

    Wow, we got three branches of the Navy in this blog.

  74. #74
    On May 14th, 2010 at 8:02 pm, zyzzyg said:

    ” . . . to focus on achieving the Obama administration’s ultimate goal of landing a man on Elena Kagan.”

    Tepidly funny, but so wrong, so definitely wrong.

    If we have to cut spending, then cut spending, and if it is your, or my, ox getting gored then so be it.

    You either support spending cuts, or you don’t. Accounting for ‘people’ in space adds additional costs to missions that can be accomplished without ‘people’.

  75. #75
    On May 14th, 2010 at 8:46 pm, MichaelO said:

    Two more launches; September (Discovery) and November(Endeavor). This is the last one for THIS Shuttle.

  76. #76
    On May 14th, 2010 at 8:51 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 5:43 pm, Hangfire said:

    That’s submerge, not sink, you S.P.

    submerge is making a presumption we intended for you to merge again

  77. #77
    On May 14th, 2010 at 10:11 pm, Hangfire said:

    Well met, Rabbid!

  78. #78
    On May 14th, 2010 at 10:23 pm, Phileosophos said:

    That joke is a bit mean spirited. But I confess I just about blew coffee all over my monitor nevertheless. I’ll bet that’s the kind of change she couldn’t believe in!

  79. #79
    On May 15th, 2010 at 12:07 am, jrgdds said:

    Atlantis launch today was beautiful, but sadly, this was her curtain call.

  80. #80
    On May 15th, 2010 at 1:41 am, AlohaGuy said:

    I’m showing my age, but I remember Al Shepard’s flight, in school.

    Did the desks catch fire or anything? :0

  81. #81
    On May 15th, 2010 at 1:41 am, AlohaGuy said:

    Wow, we got three branches of the Navy in this blog.

    One of you was Village People?!

  82. #82
    On May 15th, 2010 at 1:49 am, JohnnyD said:

    Just like some of us more seasoned citizens, I remember those fuzzy B&W launches of Mercury, Gemini and Apollo. I find it disturbing that we are not doing anything else to stay in space (other than paying for a ride on someone else’s platform). Wished I had paid closer attention about today’s launch. Wouldn’t had made a difference since I was eastbound @ 31,000 ft over Ohio @ launch time with lousy weather around.

    God Speed Atlantis.

  83. #83
    On May 15th, 2010 at 1:57 am, JohnnyD said:

    On May 15th, 2010 at 1:41 am, AlohaGuy said:

    Crap! Seeing you comment reminds me I need to forget “Island Time” and go back to bed. A hui ho all!

  84. #84
    On May 15th, 2010 at 4:38 pm, TK-421 said:

    On May 14th, 2010 at 1:32 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Now I am looking at a shell of our once great Space Program and am just plain sick in my stomach

    Agreeded 100%. We no longer seem to be willing to do anything unless its to make Mexicans or the UN happy. Ahh how far we’ve fallen, wonder if we’ll ever get a replacement, or pay the Russians for the next 50 years to take us. OR maybe we’ll write Nasa off as a waste of money (nvm it tends to give a nice big profit). From going to the moon, to watching the Chinese Plant a Red Flag into the Red Planet is what I’l wager we’ll see, that is if we get away from American Idol long enough to bother and see it.

  85. #85
    On May 15th, 2010 at 10:51 pm, jamesgreenidge said:

    On May 15th, 2010 at 4:38 pm, TK-421 said:

    … to watching the Chinese Plant a Red Flag into the Red Planet is what I’l wager we’ll see, that is if we get away from American Idol long enough to bother and see it.

    Maybe I sound too simplistic, but back then it was our sense of hazardous adventure and undiluted wonder fed by our imaginations that made the Space Program such an awesome experience to live, but nowadays with whiz-bang movie/video special effects and gee-whiz entertainment products usurping the need for imagination, reality looks “mundane” and bland to too many people. The last and only film for me that used SPX to enhance — not proxy for — our appreciation of the wonders of space was “2001″, but nowadays hyper-SPX dazzle-dazzle-bam-bam-bam SPX is more real/thrilling than reality — an imagination/awe spoiler/killer for many I know, young and not so young. I truly wonder whether even a Mars landing would be a blip to the MTV+ generation. This makes me fear a world when total-sensory virtual reality “escapes” will be available.

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  86. #86
    On May 16th, 2010 at 12:58 am, dave_r said:

    Third-to-last is “semipenultimate”. It’s not a word you get to use much, so do trot it out when you can.

  87. #87
    On May 19th, 2010 at 9:53 am, Random63 said:

    I am a laid off Shuttle worker from KSC. I wrote a blog post analyzing Obama’s speech on April 15th when he killed our entire Human Space Flight Program. You are more than welcome to check out the post and forward it if you feel it’s worth it.

    Be safe and well.

    http://www.rv-103.com/?p=457

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Video: The Road We Really Traveled

April 28, 2012 01:16 PM by Doug Powers

20 Comments

Mystery Science Theater $5 Trillion

EPA solicits 6-word essay submissions celebrating Earth and EPA, not necessarily in that order

April 18, 2012 10:05 PM by Doug Powers

147 Comments

“One planet. One people. Billion regulations.”

Al Sharpton: Parody We Much

December 11, 2011 03:33 PM by Doug Powers

38 Comments

Responsible Mall Santa-ing in the Era of Hope & Change

November 29, 2011 04:29 PM by Doug Powers

27 Comments

The art of lowering expectations

White House: No Evidence of Extraterrestrial Presence on Earth

November 6, 2011 02:05 PM by Doug Powers

104 Comments

Denied

Your Obama U.N. class photo of the day

September 23, 2011 05:49 PM by Michelle Malkin

68 Comments

At Last: The Barack Obama SEAL Team Six Action Figure

May 12, 2011 12:37 PM by Doug Powers

273 Comments

Teleprompter sold separately


Categories: Fun

Redstate

» #shrug
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook