NYT: White House Used Bill Clinton to Ask Sestak to Drop Out of Race; Updated

By Doug Powers  •  May 28, 2010 12:02 PM

**Written by guest-blogger Doug Powers

Bill Clinton met with President Obama yesterday — reportedly to discuss how to handle damage control from the oil spill in the Gulf — but it’s a good guess that a heaping helping of “getting our stories straight” was the featured item on the lunch menu:

President Obama’s chief of staff used former President Bill Clinton as an intermediary to see if Representative Joe Sestak would drop out of a Senate primary if given a prominent, but unpaid, advisory position, people briefed on the matter said Friday.

Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff, asked Mr. Clinton to explore the possibilities last summer, according to the briefed individuals, who insisted on anonymity to discuss the politically charged situation. Mr. Sestak said no and went on to win last week’s Pennsylvania Democratic primary against Senator Arlen Specter.

“Did you get Joe Sestak a job yet, Daddy?”

It seems like a believable story — I mean, who wouldn’t be convinced to give up their quest to become a United States Senator in return for a spiffy, uncompensated job title in an administration that may well be swept out of office in just over two years — sooner if nobody buys their explanation for this?

If it’s that easy I’m going to call Nancy Pelosi and convince her not to run for re-election by offering her a job as an unpaid volunteer at her plastic surgeon’s office and give her the title “Queen of the World.”

According to the New York Times, one of the “jobs” being dangled in front of Sestak was a position on the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board. One of duties of PIAB members is to bring to the president’s attention activities that are not being adequately addressed by the Attorney General — things like, oh I don’t know… the White House orchestrating a bribery to get somebody to drop out of a Senate race.

For those of you keeping score at home, “nothing improper took place” usually bats two or three spots in the lineup ahead of “mistakes were made.”

Rahm Emanuel couldn’t be reached for comment because he was in the middle of a dine-n-dash at an Israeli restaurant.

Update: Via Ed Morrissey, White House Counsel has released a memo (who’s up for another Friday document dump, holiday weekend edition?) attempting to offer an explanation, which Sestak has naturally corroborated.

Morrissey sums it up:

Excuse me, but a position on a Presidential Board is not a “job” in any sense of the word. Sestak has repeatedly insisted that the White House offered him a job to get him to withdraw from the race. Now we’re at the who’s-lying stage, and it may well be everyone.

If there is so clearly no evidence of any wrongdoing, then why didn’t they just have Robert Gibbs come out and explain it away a long time ago instead of dodging any and all press inquiries?

This is starting to get Nixonian.

Update II: As you can see, Bill Clinton was very forthcoming after being asked about the Sestak story while working the line after an event today:

**Written by guest-blogger Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:12 pm, letget said:

    I DO NOT BELIEVE ONE WORD of this! I wonder if sestak will back this up? I would think sestak would be given something to back up this up. I still think there should be an formal hearing on this by Issa.
    L

  2. #2
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:13 pm, letget said:

    letget,
    gotta proof read S/B something to back this up.
    L

  3. #3
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:15 pm, TanyaB said:

    Bill Clinton to the rescue again.
    All this time we were waiting for an answer, they were figuring how to spin this whole thing. Billy boy is always up for aiding and abetting.

  4. #4
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:19 pm, Romeo13 said:

    Hmmm… remember, its not the crime, its the coverup… so I guess he called Bill because Bill did pretty much get away with it?

    As Baby Herman said “this stinks like yesterdays diapers”…

  5. #5
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:19 pm, thejim said:

    Hey! Get Liar #1 to lie for “President Hologram” & Associates. Big surprise huh?

  6. #6
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:24 pm, rambler said:

    Can we impeach Clinton again?

  7. #7
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:26 pm, iamsaved said:

    Even though the godfather ordered the hit, he’s just as culpable. Can’t shift the blame to a useful idiot.

  8. #8
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:26 pm, Freddy said:

    With such a simply explanation now put forth, a new questions emerge.

    WHY has Joe Sestak withheld the information regarding the people that contacted both himself and his political team?

    WHAT could Joe’s motive for such obfuscation possible be?

    WHY is Joe still hiding behind this White House story?

    WHO would want a Senator that HIDES from the press during his campaign?

  9. #9
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:29 pm, Freddy said:

    … and WHY can’t Freddy post a decent leading sentence? …

    Sigh ….

  10. #10
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:35 pm, Trollman said:

    Did you get Joe Sestak a job yet, Daddy?

    Oh man, stop, you’re killing me!

    :lol:

  11. #11
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:39 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Why did Sestak pointedly say over and over the White House, The White House etc… etc. I do not believe one word of this, THEY LIE!!! But hey, whats new!

  12. #12
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:40 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    I don’t see how you can keep the President from having to testify in Blagojovich’s trial after these revelations.

    This pattern of governing merely consisting of rewarding your friends and punishing your enemies. . . as well as making bribes is very unseemly.

    Blago was only doing what the Obama administration is doing. I wonder if Sestak has a blue dress he hasn’t dry cleaned from the meeting.

  13. #13
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:49 pm, MacEamonn said:

    This story looks and smells just like pure unadulterated Pelosi to me (You thought I was going use a different word didn’t you? I now us Pelosi as a substitute word for both bulls@$% and s@$%).

    It sounds like they just added conspiracy to the list of potential charges instead of clearing anything up. Their only hope is that Sestak and his brother are willing to commit perjury if they’re hauled before a grand jury.

  14. #14
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:50 pm, Hangfire said:

    I expect the brakes to fail on Sestak’s car any day now. Anyone missing a horse head?

  15. #15
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:54 pm, MacEamonn said:

    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:26 pm, Freddy said:

    …WHO would want a Senator that HIDES from the press during his campaign?

    According to the latest polls the idiots in Connecticut don’t have a problem with a liar becoming their next Senator so why should we expect any more intelligence from the people of Pennsylvania?

  16. #16
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:56 pm, Darwin Akbar said:

    There might be a Congressional hearing on this if the Republicans regain control of the House. Using Clinton as the bagman is of course, somewhat risky, as he might have to testify under oath…..and we all know that he would never tell a lie.

    /sarc.

  17. #17
    On May 28th, 2010 at 12:58 pm, Dave Turson said:

    A buffer defense. It figures –it’s a line of defense from the Detroit “Kilpatrick family” favorite film. Ed Morrissey defines the term. From The Godfather:

    Senator Pat Geary: Mr. Cicci, would you care to amplify your answer?
    Willie Cicci: Would I what?
    Senator Pat Geary: Would you expand on your response? I’m interested to know, was there always a buffer involved?
    Willie Cicci: A what?
    Senator Pat Geary: A buffer. Someone in between you and your possible superiors who passed on to you the actual order to kill someone.
    Willie Cicci: Oh yeah, a buffer. The family had a lot of buffers!

  18. #18
    On May 28th, 2010 at 1:00 pm, et said:

    The real question is: What price did Bill charge? Was it Hillary 2012? Is Obama now officially a lameduck?

  19. #19
    On May 28th, 2010 at 1:07 pm, letget said:

    Gads, hc in 2012? Have you seen how this gal has gone to pot in the last year? She needs a hair dresser stat!
    L

  20. #20
    On May 28th, 2010 at 1:13 pm, nuss said:

    If the job offered to Sestak was a non-salaried job, or nothing of value, then why offer it to him? Not even a moron nor achild could be won over with nothing. Even if the job was a non-salary position, that doesn’t mean it has no value. Could be used as a power base to influence matters profitably for yourself, or positioning yourself for a lobbying kingdom. What a bunch of crap…Obama and his running dogs are proving their incompetence every day.

  21. #21
    On May 28th, 2010 at 1:14 pm, ThunderHawkk said:

    Dictators in Communist countries don’t HAVE to tell the truth. They just say something, and the People have no choice but to accept it.

    I would like to take this opportunity once again to thank all the a**holes who voted for Barack Obama. Way to go, you big fat stupid losers…

  22. #22
    On May 28th, 2010 at 1:22 pm, swede said:

    Asked for comment, Mrs. Clinton replied: “My husband is not the Secretary of State. I am!”

    Sufferin’ succotash! Just when you thought this couldn’t get any sweeter, enter Billy Jeff Clintoon – stage right! The go to guy – who’s credibility is impeccable. “There is no conversation with that man.” And the WH mystery man is – you guessed it – RAHMBO who…”used former President Bill Clinton as an intermediary to see if Representative Joe Sestak would drop out of a Senate primary if given a prominent, but unpaid, advisory position“. Plausible deniability?? BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA Stop! Yer killin’ me!

    Pull up a chair, grab some popcorn. It’s SHOWTIME!

  23. #23
    On May 28th, 2010 at 1:25 pm, Bruce said:

    It doesn’t matter who made the offer. The offer had to have been authorized at the highest levels (Zero, Emanuel, Axelrod), and that is the party responsible – not the messenger.

  24. #24
    On May 28th, 2010 at 1:27 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Somewhere Vince Foster is smiling.

  25. #25
    On May 28th, 2010 at 1:35 pm, swede said:

    ThunderHawkk said:
    Way to go, you big fat stupid losers…

    I should point out your statement is excessively harsh. Not all of the STUPID, SORRY A$$, CLUELESS, BRAIN DEAD LOSERS were fat.

  26. #26
    On May 28th, 2010 at 1:49 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Rahm Emanuel couldn’t be reached for comment because he was in the middle of a dine-n-dash at an Israeli restaurant.

    “The public coffers are not up for grabs and the fact that the gentleman [Emanuel] sponsors anti-Semitic policies in the White House is certainly no justification for digging into the public coffer at the expense of the old lady in the corridor of the hospital,” Ben-Ari added – in a reference to the shortage of hospital beds in Israel, which is attributed to budgetary problems.

    Hmm Doug – I’m pretty sure Sestak must be mistaken – these guys don’t have ethical lapses. …

  27. #27
    On May 28th, 2010 at 1:51 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Obama – “Find me a liar! And I mean a LIAR!”

    “Bill Clinton’s office – are you calling about the Internship?”

  28. #28
    On May 28th, 2010 at 2:04 pm, vinny said:

    Funny post. Nevertheless I find it credible that this White house is trying to entice people into working for free. After all, this is what they want to do to everyone in the health care industry. While we’re at it, I welcome all congress critters to volunteer their time picking up trash along NYC freeways.

  29. #29
    On May 28th, 2010 at 2:05 pm, vinny said:

    Obama and Biden should lead by example. Lets see the diabolical duo dig some ditches.

  30. #30
    On May 28th, 2010 at 2:09 pm, vinny said:

    LATEST NEWS: Sestak was offered a special price on the Brooklyn Bridge to stay out of the senate race.

  31. #31
    On May 28th, 2010 at 2:53 pm, thegreatbeast said:

    And of course it is a perfect piece of casting in getting Bill Clinton to run interference on this. He’ll just dazzle ‘em with an unending line of barbrastreisand.
    And to wrap the matter up in pretty paper with a handsome bow they can have the inestimable Patrick Fitzgerald to work it down to a misdemeanor below jaywalking in seriousness.

  32. #32
    On May 28th, 2010 at 4:24 pm, The Master said:

    Was this one of the “jobs” that Obama “saved or created”?

  33. #33
    On May 28th, 2010 at 4:41 pm, MacEamonn said:

    Sestak was just live from the Capitol steps and…Democrat=Liar. Joe Sestak is a Democrat. Enough said.

  34. #34
    On May 28th, 2010 at 4:57 pm, bmac727 said:

    The White House – Clinton – Sestak story is simply Incredulous!

  35. #35
    On May 28th, 2010 at 5:38 pm, babiesgrandma said:

    Now, let’s be fair about this: It was a complete misunderstanding. Billy Clinton thought they said the SEX TAPE problem instead of Sestak. Hearing is the 2nd thing to go….

  36. #36
    On May 28th, 2010 at 7:16 pm, tarpon said:

    ROFLMAO with both legs kicking in the air.

  37. #37
    On May 28th, 2010 at 7:17 pm, T-Bone said:

    And what kind of “job” was Bill thinking about getting or giving in the White House?

    We have a Sextape problem. Can you offer him a “job” in the Oval office?

    Cigar anyone?

  38. #38
    On May 28th, 2010 at 8:24 pm, John Deaux said:

    Who’d have thought Blago would end up being the one that sounded honest?

  39. #39
    On May 28th, 2010 at 9:36 pm, dan708 said:

    Ah, Slick Willy. He’s no longer prez, but still as smooth as a used car salesman. NOT!

  40. #40
    On May 28th, 2010 at 10:16 pm, Papa Louie said:

    Is there any mystery about how slick Willy would respond under oath?

    SENATOR: “Did you offer a job to Mr. Sestak?”
    CLINTON: “That depends on what the definition of ‘job’ is.”
    SENATOR: “Let me rephrase the question. Did you make an offer of employment of any kind to Mr. Sestak?”
    CLINTON: “Let me be clear. I did not have employer relations with that man, Mr. Sestak.” …

  41. #41
    On May 29th, 2010 at 8:26 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On May 28th, 2010 at 4:57 pm, bmac727 said:

    The White House – Clinton – Sestak story is simply Incredulous!

    That would depend on the meaning of “is” I guess ;)

    Yes it is incredulous but with a friendly press, congress and Justice Department there is little if any incentive for them not to lie. There are a few Huff and Puff statements out there but beyond Representative Issa not much thunder and lightning. That Bambi sent Bill Clinton to do his bidding (get me a cup of coffee, boy) is rich. Miss Hillary must be fuming-again.

    But perhaps the story will have enough traction to help knock off Sestak this November. Do they have hanging chads in PA?
    ===
    When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are undisturbed.

  42. #42
    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:07 am, Lindsay said:

    The White House got this idea (Slick Willie as the fall guy) from the latest episodes of “24″ where former President Weasel-face Logan’s corrupt ideas (Clinton’s) were used to enhance Allison Taylor’s ambitions (Obammy).

    This Sestak excuse shows how desperate this administration is for fresh ideas to cover their Chicago tactics. Plus,there was the news dump on a Friday before a three-day weekend to soften the blow.

    Bill Clinton, former impeached cigar-smokin’ Prez, husband of the current Secretary of State, the sacrificial lamb (mutton) of our Dear Leader’s transparent reign. What could go wrong?

  43. #43
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:29 am, thejim said:

    I keep returning to my question: Who could vote for any Democrat and still be considered an American?

  44. #44
    On May 29th, 2010 at 3:06 pm, thejim said:

    The real news coming out of the OBambi-Clinton lunch is Hillary to replace Biden on the 2012 Democrat ticket! Guess that answers one of the questions!

  45. #45
    On May 29th, 2010 at 5:26 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    Why yes dear I did have sex with our next door neighbor next door. But the neighbor across the street asked me to.

    So we’re good right?

  46. #46
    On June 2nd, 2010 at 5:19 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    So, Billy C, what ya been up to lately?

    Aw, nothin’ really…just trying to get some dumb schmuck a job with Hillary’s predecessor and hopin’ he’ll work for nothin’. Man, Obama’s really countin’ on me to git ‘er done. But, hey, I’m hopin’ all this is legal, cuz I be done had enough with legal investigations, know what I mean? Hah! Got a light for my cigar?

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Nancy Pelosi Explains Why Obama Flip-Flopped on Super PACs

February 9, 2012 10:08 PM by Doug Powers

50 Comments

Stealth altruism

Former Democrat Rep. Regrets Vote for Obamacare Due to Contraceptive Coverage

February 7, 2012 03:40 PM by Doug Powers

75 Comments

She wasn’t kidding

Hiring Spree in NYC

February 1, 2012 02:47 PM by Doug Powers

43 Comments

Mr. and Mrs. Cranky Pants

January 27, 2012 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

138 Comments

Stimulus-Backed ‘Green’ Bankruptcy of the Week: Ener1

January 26, 2012 03:06 PM by Doug Powers

67 Comments

Battery maker on verge of going terminals-up

Obama and Jan Brewer Have Words on Airport Tarmac; Update: Brewer Book Sales Skyrocket

January 25, 2012 09:54 PM by Doug Powers

165 Comments

Book-Critic-in-Chief takes issue


Categories: Barack Obama,Bill Clinton

Babalu Blog

» Greece is Burning
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook