Those Folks at the Daily Caller Sure Have a Good Sense of Humor

By Doug Powers  •  May 29, 2010 09:47 AM

**Written by guest-blogger Doug Powers

Tis the season for giving instead of receiving… for a change:

null

The problem for Bill and the Obama administration is that “job offer” might have saved its clothes in a closet and told a friend about it.

The White House is now hoping everybody believes that they were unaware Sestak would have been ineligible to take the unpaid advisory position Bill Clinton allegedly offered.

That seems like quite a lot of oversight for the most intelligent people in the history of the universe, doesn’t it?

Update: Wow, you know it’s a bad sign for Team Obama when Chris “the tingle has left the building” Matthews is complimenting Rush Limbaugh!

**Written by guest-blogger Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Bill Clinton,Fun,Media

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On May 29th, 2010 at 9:55 am, thejim said:

    Come-on-now, when you’re under pressure to make up some lie to cover your AX on short notice, even the most devious of lawyers struggle some. Having the whole media help in the lie should do it though.

  2. #2
    On May 29th, 2010 at 9:57 am, GraniteMan said:

    These guys are going to save the economy, run Health Care, fix the financial markets, run the Climate Change (hoax), and conduct the war on terror?—-God help us cause we’ve no where else to turn.

  3. #3
    On May 29th, 2010 at 9:58 am, ex-expat said:

    Oh-My-God!

  4. #4
    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:04 am, txvet2 said:

    The most obvious possibility is that the “advisory position” story is BS. At the time, speculation had it that he was offered Navy Secretary, which may or may not be accurate – but it makes a lot more sense.

  5. #5
    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:07 am, letget said:

    OMG! Do these people proof read before they put a headline like that in the paper?

  6. #6
    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:14 am, rambler said:

    I think the headline was intentional.

  7. #7
    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:14 am, PhredE said:

    Hahahahahaha!

    [in the voice of Dr. Evil] How very astute of you Mr. Powers![/]

  8. #8
    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:22 am, beenthere said:

    I presume this means that Obama will now start blaming Clinton as well as Bush. This may make sense politically, which is the only way he can see anything. Other than that, what a foolish choice on Obama’s part. Was the man asleep during the nineties? The rule with the Clinton’s is that they may never be punished, but they always get caught.

  9. #9
    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:32 am, rambler said:

    Clinton is the perennial naughty child who misbehaves for attention. This puts him back in to relevance again. This situation may not be as easily spun as his others were. He is a private citizen and liable for his own defense on his own dime, if all this blows up. While all of these clowns constantly remind us about their intelligence and their degrees, they are losers in the common sense department. They have lied their way to the top and will lie their way to the bottom.

  10. #10
    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:54 am, ex-expat said:

    Is Monica Lewinsky available for comment? :)

  11. #11
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:05 am, hunter said:

    There is no way that they didn’t realize how that headline could be taken. That is hilarious!

  12. #12
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:06 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    Except this time this isn’t going to cut it. This time some folks are going down. November’s election is going to make a huge difference AND Sestak is still running and wants to be elected. The story isn’t going away because he is not going to be able to ignore it and run his campaign.

    It just keeps getting better and better.

  13. #13
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:18 am, greenfairie said:

    Those scamps!

    This is right up there with a NY Daily News headline about a cremation scam several years back:

    “Ash-holes!”

  14. #14
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:23 am, thejim said:

    Again folks, This will require a news media that actually does their job honestly, and a Republican Party that demonstrates some nads. Otherwise the story ends up as yesterday’s news and on the bottom of the birdcage.

  15. #15
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:23 am, babbledabble said:

    Color me skeptical but the Dems aren’t going anywhere. Read “The Blueprint – Obama’s Plan to Subvert the Constitution & Build an Imperial Presidency”. Scary!

    No, I have no personal interest in selling this book. You can probably get it at your local library (if they are not too liberal)

  16. #16
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:27 am, Uplander said:

    The question now is, what does ‘The Won’ owe Uncle Willy for this sacrificial diversion. I can’t wait for the next episode.

  17. #17
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:33 am, Member-VRWC said:

    Still, the idea that they offered Sestak an UNPAID position on some flunky advisory board in return for his withdrawal from the senate primary is ridiculous. No one in the House trying to move up the political ladder would accept that deal.

    Now Sestak is also a participant in the cover-up. I hope voters in PA will do the right thing and show him the door in November. Unfortunately, their track record indicates they will do just the opposite. Come on, PA, I’ll be thrilled if you prove me wrong and elect Toomey.

  18. #18
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:34 am, swede said:

    jsmiddleton4 said:
    Except this time this isn’t going to cut it. This time some folks are going down…

    It just keeps getting better and better.

    It does indeed. Hey Barry, have you ever heard the old saying, “You can put lipstick on a pig, but its still a pig.” Oh yeah, guess you have.

    Rahm – Sestak – Stonewall – Billy Jeff – JOB OFFER – Silly spinning…

    Oink.

  19. #19
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:38 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    The best they could spin this thing is to admit they did it but that if you split hairs it wasn’t illegal so we can trust them.

    THAT is as good as it gets? Really?

    Someone going down.

  20. #20
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:38 am, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    The ethics in government legislation was written in 1978 as a result of the Watergate Scandal. It was last amended and put into law in 1996 during the Clinton administration. If I remember correctly, this law was put into place to give greater powers to government ethics officials to prevent ethical conflicts of various kinds and applied to everyone in the federal government including every bureaucrat. I know for a fact because it happened to me and some friends that any kind of outside employment was looked at as a conflict of interest which could be prosecuted under this law.

    I remember one guy who ran a soccer league for kids in the DC area. He was paid a small annual income – and when this law came out it was obvious that it applied to him unless he could arrange for a long term contract – as a long term contract associated with outside employment that predated the effective date of the law was excluded. What was really idiotic was that he was a civilian working for the Department of Defense, so unless you assume that kid’s soccer league in DC is of military importance – oops, I forgot that we are now dealing with a new military – there was no conflict of interest.

    Since I also ran a small business at the time as well as being a government employee, I just wrote myself a long term contract and then retired from the DoD before the contract ran out. However, people were prosecuted under this law so there is no reason that Clinton and Emanuel should not be investigated and prosecuted. Also, since it appears that Sestak is now playing games, he is a co-conspirator.

    It is stupifying to watch two of the most corrupt administrations working together. I wonder what the movie will be called. But I like the idea of “Clinton Blows another Job” or “The Govefather”.

  21. #21
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:41 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “Now Sestak is also a participant in the cover-up.”

    And Spectre is sitting there slapping his forehead going “I lost to this guy! Thanks Obama for nothing….”

  22. #22
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:41 am, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    Still, the idea that they offered Sestak an UNPAID position on some flunky advisory board in return for his withdrawal from the senate primary is ridiculous. No one in the House trying to move up the political ladder would accept that deal.

    First of all, while it may be unpaid it is not without value. Many of these positions provide opportunities to influence legislation – and such influence is worth big bucks. Second, the deal may have two steps to it. Step 1 is unpaid and advisory. Step 2 is the move to the Secretary of the Navy.

  23. #23
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:44 am, Truesoldier said:

    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:22 am, beenthere said:
    I presume this means that Obama will now start blaming Clinton as well as Bush. This may make sense politically, which is the only way he can see anything.

    That is what I thought at first too, but if that is the case I think it is going to backfire big time with the Dem voters.

    My wifes Grandmother is a huge ultra bay area lib and she called us to tell us about this twist in the Sestak tale. She is ticked off in a big way over this, because Bill Clinton is her favorite President of all times. So this blame Clinton strategy may turn more of the likely Dem voters away form Obama (and could very well push them into trying to get Hillary to run in 2012).

  24. #24
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:48 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    And every single thing that comes under the heading Obama-Clinton, ANY Clinton, is tainted with payback allegations.

    Seems to me Clinton is so desperate to get back in the swing of things he made a strategically poor choice.

    So now Sestak’s position was payback for dropping out, anything Obama does for any Clinton is payback for Bill attempting to take the heat for Sestak.

    Oh the tangled web we weave when we practice to deceive…..

  25. #25
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:49 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    I can’t wait for that Sestak and Obama joint appearance. That’ll be rich with irony hey?

  26. #26
    On May 29th, 2010 at 12:16 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

    Clinton would like to have a joint apperance.

  27. #27
    On May 29th, 2010 at 12:28 pm, letget said:

    jsmiddleton4,
    I have a feeling this bho and sestak will not be seen in the same building together!
    L

  28. #28
    On May 29th, 2010 at 12:31 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    So what if Sestak was ineligible, so is Obama.

    Nothing will come of this. Or that.

  29. #29
    On May 29th, 2010 at 12:35 pm, rambler said:

    Bho had to be beyond stupid to get a consumate liar to pitch an argument for the White House. Why not try the “I didn’t offer a job to that man” or “it depends upon what you mean by a job” while pointing a finger with a beet red face?

  30. #30
    On May 29th, 2010 at 12:36 pm, zorro said:

    Good stuff Doug!

    Clinton, Obama, Ayers… birds of a feather…

  31. #31
    On May 29th, 2010 at 12:50 pm, swede said:

    Virginia Patriot said:
    Nothing will come of this. Or that.

    This and that both reek to high heaven. The difference is that this – even if no indictments follow – brings serious questions on the veracity and credibility, transparency (not to mention intelligence) of Team Barry, could well get Toomey elected – and casts a big black cloud over the whole Hopeychangey we are the world flying circus.

    If nothing else, the entertainment value is outstanding!

  32. #32
    On May 29th, 2010 at 12:53 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “The difference is”

    The difference is Sestak is running a campaign. This can’t go away unless Sestak quits.

  33. #33
    On May 29th, 2010 at 1:08 pm, Ragspierre said:

    My little gift to all on Memorial Day…

    Sestak and The ObaBubba Third Way

    I hope you enjoy!!!

  34. #34
    On May 29th, 2010 at 1:09 pm, swede said:

    Sestak is running a campaign

    That was pretty much my point dude.

    “could well get Toomey elected”

    Has anyone asked Billy Jeff if he inhaled yet? Just wonderin.

  35. #35
    On May 29th, 2010 at 1:17 pm, Prime Director said:

    The Daily Caller said:

    Clinton Blows Job Offer

    Huh. I thought that was egg on his face.

    My mistake.

  36. #36
    On May 29th, 2010 at 1:23 pm, letget said:

    Ragspierre,
    Great job! We need to keep both the oil mess and this mess before the public! Both stink!
    L

  37. #37
    On May 29th, 2010 at 1:26 pm, Ragspierre said:

    On May 29th, 2010 at 1:23 pm, letget said:

    Thank you, kindly.

    Did you find anything I missed???

  38. #38
    On May 29th, 2010 at 1:27 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “That was pretty much my point dude.”

    Your point is about electing Toomey. Mine is about criminal charges. Not quite the same.

  39. #39
    On May 29th, 2010 at 1:32 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    At the height of the Lewinsky scandal,
    Hurricane Bonnie hit southeastern NC.

    The Sampson Independent, based in Clinton, NC,
    chose the following for their lede headline:

    Bonnie blows Clinton

  40. #40
    On May 29th, 2010 at 1:36 pm, letget said:

    Ragspierre,
    I was going to post on your site, but being I am not all that wonderful understanding computers, I don’t know what ‘select profile’ means? Nothing there looked like something I have or know about. Sorry for being so ignorant.
    L

  41. #41
    On May 29th, 2010 at 1:44 pm, Ragspierre said:

    I don’t know what ’select profile’ means? Nothing there looked like something I have or know about. Sorry for being so ignorant.

    I dunno, but I think you can use the same profile you do here.

    You might also have a google profile you can use. If not, you can make one up by selecting the “google” option.

  42. #42
    On May 29th, 2010 at 1:45 pm, Wethal said:

    Drudge and the New York Post are both ticked that they didn’t think of this headline first.

  43. #43
    On May 29th, 2010 at 1:47 pm, Ragspierre said:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/7769126/US-money-supply-plunges-at-1930s-pace-as-Obama-eyes-fresh-stimulus.html

    Swede, that is the link to the money supply shrinking at 1930 levels.

    Which is really scary…

  44. #44
    On May 29th, 2010 at 2:01 pm, swede said:

    I dunno, but I think you can use the same profile you do here.

    I ran into the same thing rags. I had to register a gmail account to post there. No biggie, but I wonder if its putting of people from posting. This is WordPress – yours is Blogger.com.

  45. #45
    On May 29th, 2010 at 2:11 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    There are those who will say they believe this.
    They are lying too.
    There are people who will mention Bush I & II
    They are lying too.
    There are people who will mention Ike and Reagan.
    They are lying too.

    But this morning my youngest grandchild-five years old- came in and asked about the Federal Reserve Discount Rate.
    And now I can work for this administration.
    ===
    An Armed Society is a polite society.

  46. #46
    On May 29th, 2010 at 2:24 pm, Ragspierre said:

    I ran into the same thing rags. I had to register a gmail account to post there. No biggie, but I wonder if its putting of people from posting. This is WordPress – yours is Blogger.com.

    In the little “comment as…” pull-down menu thingy, there is a WordPress option. I never tried my profile that I use here, tho…

    I have plans to revamp the blog considerably…someday…I hope…

  47. #47
    On May 29th, 2010 at 2:27 pm, BrianNY said:

    Oh goodie! We’ll certainly get to the bottom of this sordid deal now that Bubba Clinton is chestnuts-deep.

    While we’re at it, does Balloon-Boy’s dad have any comment?

  48. #48
    On May 29th, 2010 at 2:55 pm, bjc said:

    Clinton Blows

    *There, I fixed the headline for them; Your welcome in advance.

  49. #49
    On May 29th, 2010 at 3:02 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Clinton Blows, and it Sucks

    I submit…

  50. #50
    On May 29th, 2010 at 3:03 pm, thejim said:

    The real news out of the Obambi-Clinton lunch is being missed by almost everbody. Hillary to fill the #2 spot on the 2012 Democrat Ticket…..WOW! Just when you thought it couldn’t possibly get any better.

  51. #51
    On May 29th, 2010 at 3:15 pm, bjc said:

    Hillary to fill the #2 spot on the 2012 Democrat Ticket…..WOW!

    *This allows me to once again throw out my long ago prediction, that Hillary will challenge P-BO for the Dem nomination in 2012; She is a Clinton after all, and although it is unkown whether she will blow it, she will give it a try.

  52. #52
    On May 29th, 2010 at 3:17 pm, Dandapani said:

    They certainly couldn’t just hand job to him…

  53. #53
    On May 29th, 2010 at 3:25 pm, swede said:

    Hillary to fill the #2 spot on the 2012 Democrat Ticket

    Nah. Barry says you don’t mess with Joe – and this would require a willing suspension of disbelief. Whatever that means.

    With Billy Jeff pulling the old hoof ‘n mouth again, you have to believe there will be frost warnings in the old Clintoon Castle. There will be no relations with that woman.

  54. #54
    On May 29th, 2010 at 3:33 pm, swede said:

    Hillary will challenge P-BO for the Dem nomination in 2012

    Bet on it bjc. When she ran for senate in New York, she said she had no interest in running for presidente. Nobody believed her then, why believe her now. Why is she completely off the radar now with all this stuff going on? Surprise attack!

    Campaign Theme: WHAT DID I TELL YOU?

  55. #55
    On May 29th, 2010 at 3:35 pm, thejim said:

    The point is Ole Bill gets paid to take one for the Team……

  56. #56
    On May 29th, 2010 at 4:06 pm, Bruce said:

    Let’s stop the BS, okay? Here is what Sestak himself said in answer to a question from David Gregory on “Meet the Press”:

    During his Meet the Press appearance, Sestak was asked by moderator David Gregory in this fashion:

    MR. GREGORY: Yes or no, straightforward question. Were you, were you offered a job, and what was the job?

    REP. SESTAK: I was offered a job, and I answered that.

    MR. GREGORY: You said no, you wouldn’t take the job. Was it the secretary of the Navy?

    REP. SESTAK: Right. And I also said, “Look, I’m getting into this…

    The “Right” answer would be the first time that Sestak has personally confirmed what has been long suspected — the bribe Issa mentions was indeed the job of Secretary of the Navy.

    That about wraps it up in my opinion. Yet, it doesn’t matter if the job offer was unpaid or not – the fact remains an offer of a job – or anything of VALUE – to drop out of or not run in an election is a federal felony. Spin away, Dems, but you all know damned well that if this was the Bush or any Republican administration the dems would be frothing at the mouth screaming for a Special Prosecutor. Or impeachment. You know it and so do I.

  57. #57
    On May 29th, 2010 at 4:15 pm, Bruce said:

    As an aside – I had that bit posted on my blog on 5/24. I guess everyone else missed it. Hmmmm….

  58. #58
    On May 29th, 2010 at 4:25 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Bruce, can you provide a link to video of that exchange?

    I don’t doubt what you wrote, but sometimes the exchange isn’t fairly depicted in a transcript.

  59. #59
    On May 29th, 2010 at 4:31 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    OK, I’ve got it!

    Bill to Barack: “Ok, I’ll say I made Sestak a job offer, and in return you step aside in 2012 and endorse Hillary. What the heck, you’re going down anyway – and believe me I know “going down” – but I’ll give you a job in return. You’ll be in charge of interviewing all the skinny interns. I’ll take the chubby ones. heck, you can even have your own cigars – Cuban”

  60. #60
    On May 29th, 2010 at 4:33 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    As an aside – I had that bit posted on my blog on 5/24. I guess everyone else missed it.

    Hard to believe we all read Michelle’s blog and not yours… ;)

  61. #61
    On May 29th, 2010 at 4:51 pm, swede said:

    Bruce said:

    Never connected you with Curmudgeon for some reason. Great site – good work.

    One thing – The subfile “Liberal Douchebags” may be a contradiction. A douchebag is actually a useful thing. Hey, if the shoe fits.

  62. #62
    On May 29th, 2010 at 5:12 pm, rightisright said:

    On May 29th, 2010 at 4:31 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    OK, I’ve got it!

    that was good AG, and the really funny part is, I’d bet if I was a betting(which I am) man, oh BillyJoeBubba is actually thinking along those exact lines.

  63. #63
    On May 29th, 2010 at 5:33 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Let’s see. Does this make Clinton an accessory after the fact or a member of a conspiracy and facing obstruction charges or what? Inquiring minds want to know.

    It looks like Bill has found a way to defeat Hillary and Obama and himself at the same time. Priceless!

    Hillary has got to be drowning her grief in more taxpayer-funded booze after this mess.

  64. #64
    On May 29th, 2010 at 5:45 pm, madmonkphotog said:

    Oh, my! Slick Willie’s reputation is stained with disgrace.

    Thank, you. Thank you. You’ve been a great audience. GOOD NIGHT!

    (exit stage left)

  65. #65
    On May 29th, 2010 at 6:04 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “Does this make Clinton an accessory after the fact”

    Been thinking about that myself. Obstructing justice if he’s lying?

  66. #66
    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:19 pm, Bruce said:

    http://sharing.theflip.com/session/efdbb867c42a6be1a0f5512910286f5d/video/14322014

    I know – it’s mystifying! LOL

    On the other hand, unlike a certain other regular here I don’t plug my blog with links in every post. But then my ego doesn’t require it.

  67. #67
    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:21 pm, Bruce said:

    Whoaa… where the hell did that link insert come from?

    Rags – unfortunately I can’t. A video of the show has to exist, but I don’t have it.

    Swede – thanks:)

  68. #68
    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:23 pm, Bruce said:

    Hard to believe we all read Michelle’s blog and not yours

    (corrected)

    I know – it’s mystifying! LOL

    On the other hand, unlike a certain other regular here I don’t plug my blog with links in every post. But then my ego doesn’t require it.

  69. #69
    On May 29th, 2010 at 10:43 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Barack Obama can compile a rap sheet as long as Al Capone and it won’t matter in the least.

    It is difficult to imagine Obama getting convicted in a Senate trial even if the GOP takes a small majority in 2010. The Dems would filibuster this forever, regardless of the cost to the nation and the constitution.

    Impeachment isn’t likely between now and 2012 unless something completely unforeseen happens. If Barack’s original BC from Kenya were discovered in Vince Foster’s grave that might be enough to get him convicted or if he is caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy (although for the Dems that might not be taken as a bad thing).

    Short of that, we are stuck with this Marxist incompetent through January 2013. The question is how much can he neuter himself over the next few months thus limiting the damage he can do in then ext 2 1/2 years.

    Frankly, even I am impressed by his gross incompetence and ineptitude. Even I didn’t think he would out-shine Jimmy Carter by THIS MUCH, THIS QUICKLY. This man displays true talent in this regard. But we aren’t going to see him impeached on in the Sestak felony…

  70. #70
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:33 pm, swede said:

    Frankly, even I am impressed by his gross incompetence and ineptitude. Even I didn’t think he would out-shine Jimmy Carter by THIS MUCH, THIS QUICKLY. This man displays true talent in this regard. But we aren’t going to see him impeached on in the Sestak felony…

    Yeah, it’s good to offer compliments where they are due. He is an outstanding screw up – among the best.

    I have a feeling there’s more entertainment to come from this Sestak circus. You’re right, impeachment is not a likely scenario – but between ObaBubbagate and his “Oil Can Barry” performance this week we will soon be enjoying watching him augur in, no?

    I just pray we don’t come under attack or have a major national or international crisis for a couple years at least. Our CinC is a weenie.

  71. #71
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:36 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Bruce,

    Perhaps your comment was directed at someone else and “my ego” has me responding to a comment not meant for me. But if perchance your last comment was aimed at me, I don’t link to my own posts with every comment.

    (Please note that the only comment I have made previously in this thread contained a link not to my blog, but to an image of the front-page newspaper headline to which I was referring… it’s worth following the link)

    When I do link to my own posts, it’s not with the intent to “plug my blog” but rather as a convenience so that I don’t have to repeat material here that I’ve already written there. It’s also, in my opinion, more polite to provide a link rather than expounding here. Those that choose to follow the link, follow it, and those that choose not to, don’t.

    I know that some disagree with that perspective. That’s fine with me. We can agree to diagree. We have different styles, but we play for the same team and fight the same battle against the Democratic Socialists.

  72. #72
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:42 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Carter was a Socialist/Communist.

    Obama is a Socialist/Communist.

    One of the common links to both is Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Trilateral Commission.

    I have a hunch that Zbigniew Brzezinski, Bill Ayers, and George Soros are some of the puppetmasters who send messages to Barack’s Blackberry.

    I’d love to see Obama’s Blackberry and teleprompters taken away permanently. Not going to happen, of course, but I’d love to see this puppet keep talking without the puppetmasters controlling every word.

  73. #73
    On May 29th, 2010 at 11:45 pm, TooMuchTime said:
  74. #74
    On May 30th, 2010 at 12:01 am, Bruce said:

    Rags – looked for a vid but haven’t found it yet. The original link came from American Spectator, article as follows:

  75. #75
    On May 30th, 2010 at 12:02 am, Bruce said:

    Oh for craps sake, these message tools are a pain. Lets try again…

    LINK

  76. #76
    On May 30th, 2010 at 2:25 am, WarEagle82 said:

    I hope the GOP continues to push the various bribes offered to more than one candidate. I don’t know if this will come of anything but hammering Obama and his witless cronies is important. I am tired of the lies about “hope and change” when in fact Obama is more about “corruption and incompetence.”

    Sestak was probably unaware that such an offer was illegal when he first mentioned this back in February. After all, he is not a lawyer. But it is obvious that he is aware of this little problem now or he wouldn’t be doing a tap dance. The only problem for Sestak is that the obvious lies that Obama/Clinton are telling now have dragged him in to this mess as an accomplice rather than as a victim of the corruption he claims to oppose.

    This looks like a lose-lose-lose situation for Obama, Clinton and Sestak.

  77. #77
    On May 30th, 2010 at 7:10 am, docjohn52 said:

    More bulls**t from an absolutely corrupt White house.
    Why am I amazed they would let a convicted liar, take the blame?

    Focused like a laser beam on November…

    C’ya all under the freeway overpass I hope.

  78. #78
    On May 30th, 2010 at 7:43 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    In other Culture of Corruption news…
    If you haven’t seen this already over at Hot Air, it is a must-read:

    Obama, ACORN and Stealth Socialism
    posted at 5:00 pm on May 29, 2010 by Anita MonCrief

    As an ex-ACORN insider and ex-radical who used Democrat donor lists to raise money for ACORN alter-ego Project Vote and designed the ACORN 2005, 2006 and 2007 Political Operations Year End PowerPoint presentations, I know that President Obama (for whom I now regretfully admit I proudly voted) was an ACORN guy for many years and realize that he became the instrument for the implementation of its stealth socialism agenda.

  79. #79
    On May 30th, 2010 at 8:22 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Focused like a laser beam on November…

    We should be doing everything in our power right now to help ensure that the November elections are kept honest. We know they will cheat and break the law in an attempt to win. They have before, and they will try to again. Pray for corruption to be exposed, prosecuted, convicted, and prevented.

  80. #80
    On May 30th, 2010 at 10:57 am, Connect the Dots said:

    d’ya think billy is coming forth in “support” of Owe-Bow-Mao and his regime, then when he gets on the witness stand in front of Congress, will change his testimony?

    Could be a back-door method for him to get wifey into the WH.

  81. #81
    On May 30th, 2010 at 10:59 am, Connect the Dots said:

    After all, if a few chips fall into place, hillary could be POTUS.

    In line for POTUS:
    1 Vice President
    2 Speaker of the House of Representatives
    3 President Pro Tempore of the Senate
    4 Secretary of State — Ding ding ding — we have a winnah!!

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Global Warmists Seek to Flush Out ‘Denier’ Meteorologists

January 30, 2012 04:09 PM by Doug Powers

104 Comments

Cloudy with a chance of fiery death

Editor’s Note of the Day

January 18, 2012 02:36 PM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments

Left Kind of Upset With Politifact’s ‘Lie of the Year’ Choice

December 20, 2011 01:41 PM by Doug Powers

73 Comments

“Throw grandma from the cliff” blowback

MTV Ditches ‘Choose or Lose’ Slogan

December 19, 2011 10:59 AM by Doug Powers

100 Comments

Chose and lost?

Al Sharpton: Parody We Much

December 11, 2011 03:33 PM by Doug Powers

38 Comments

Lib media journos punked by fake SEIU press release

December 7, 2011 09:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments

Professor: ‘Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer’ Promotes Bullying

December 5, 2011 04:39 PM by Doug Powers

136 Comments

Bad Santa


Categories: Bill Clinton,Fun,Media

Babalu Blog

» Greece is Burning
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook