Media Starting to Run With Rumor That Sarah Palin Got Breast Implants

By Doug Powers  •  June 9, 2010 07:22 PM

**Written by guest-blogger Doug Powers

Via Newsbusters — Over the weekend, a Reuters photographer took this picture of Sarah and Todd Palin at the Belmont Stakes in New York:

null

I’d seen the picture, because somebody on Twitter posted a link to it, and I believe his exact words were “Wowee-wow-woweeeee” or something like that, but he was in no position to make an official call because his glasses were fogged up.

For me, discussion about that picture pretty much ended there, but not for others.

The liberal blog Wonkette asked if Palin had purchased herself a couple of “luxury items,” and of course HuffPo ran with it. Then somebody at the Boston Herald picked it up. Then the Toronto Sun. Then Fox Boston (I’m not really one to talk though, because I started the same rumor last year about Al Gore).

Another picture taken the same day would seem to dispel any enhancement talk, not that it’s going to put an end to it:

null

Here’s my own two, uh, cents: If there is anything slightly out of the ordinary about the Palin picture, it’s probably just Joe McGinniss stowing away under there unbeknownst to Sarah. In other words, she might be unwittingly wearing a “push-up stalker.”

By the way, if he hasn’t already, expect Andrew Sullivan to start a rumor that those aren’t Sarah’s at all, but actually Bristol’s and Sarah’s just pretending to raise them as her own.

Sometimes I think that the left simply forgets that they’re not looking at Tina Fey. In any case, we’re witnessing the birth of the “boob truther” movement.

Update: After I posted about the “boob truther” movement on Twitter, I was given some suggestions for what to call it’s followers — “Boobers” leads the pack so far.

Update II: Smoking gun evidence Palin didn’t get a boob job.

**Written by guest-blogger Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Media,Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On June 10th, 2010 at 5:12 pm, revolution said:

    Andrew Sullivan,

    Please hurry up and die of AIDS.

    Love,
    Jesus

  2. #102
    On June 10th, 2010 at 6:35 pm, martin.musculus said:

    Natural or enhanced:
    It makes NO difference — except to the Statists, who’ve never grown beyound the adolescent stage of emotional development. They measure everyone by themselves, and so think ti score points this way.

    Therefore I say:
    So what if they are OR they aren’t.
    After all, unlike Progressive Pols, SHE doesn’t use’em to THINK with…

  3. #103
    On June 10th, 2010 at 8:34 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    I think I finaly understand the root of this attack on Sarah…

    When the left sees something that they know could help the right, the left goes all Alinsky on it.

    Remember when George W. Bush landed on that aircraft carrier, and the women loved that picture of him in a flight suit?

    The left knew that picture could help the right, so they had to find something to attack… something that would upstage the picture… and the result was their attack on the “Mission Accomplished” banner.

    Now, this picture of Sarah is similar… guys, in general, like this picture of her, and the left knew that the picture could help the right, so they had to find something to attack… something that would upstage the picture… and the result is their attack on her brests. Crazy, yes, but that’s Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals…

  4. #104
    On June 10th, 2010 at 8:35 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    I can’t believe I just misspelled that word… :-(

  5. #105
    On June 10th, 2010 at 8:46 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Thank G-d for beautiful women.

  6. #106
    On June 10th, 2010 at 9:23 pm, Dimsdale said:

    It beats the snot out of looking at the likes of the best the left has to offer: Helen Thomas, Whoopie Goldberg, Pelosi, etc., etc., etc.

    You just keep torturing those lefty she males with your natural AND your political assets, Sarah!

  7. #107
    On June 10th, 2010 at 10:22 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On June 10th, 2010 at 2:51 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Hoping her next book is titled “Going Commando”

    Oh man, with pictures and pop-ups… and….

    Comparisons with the hippie-chick, pie-wagons on the left at the back of the book.

    Can you imagine some shots of Helen Thomas, Boxer, Bela Abzug, Hillary and others who went “commando” in the 60′s when they burned their bras and their…outlook, sagging since?

  8. #108
    On June 10th, 2010 at 11:33 pm, William said:

    Yikes!

    The left just discovered that Sarah Palin has breasts!!!!!!

    What is the world coming to?

    The left is obsessed with Sarah Palin and her girl parts.

    Note to leftist, progressive, obsessive, salacious prudes, men and women are different. They have different sensitivities, different interests, different moods, and different parts.

    Girls are curvier, softer, and prettier.

    Men are bigger, harder, stronger, rougher.

    Viv le difference!!!!!

  9. #109
    On June 11th, 2010 at 6:59 am, Hulka said:

    On June 10th, 2010 at 12:04 pm, Brian72 said:
    I have a couple of things to say about this

    And you said it very well.

    Thank you.

  10. #110
    On June 11th, 2010 at 3:37 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Yes! William #115 – Vive le difference! As a not so well endowed woman, I’m thankful for what I’ve got…and I thank the men I have known who appreciate women. God bless you, guys, you always do the heavy lifting.

  11. #111
    On June 11th, 2010 at 3:39 pm, limmo said:

    Should we expect photos, next, of Prez Obama’s package with an discussion of what they show?

  12. #112
    On June 11th, 2010 at 5:30 pm, prendad said:

    On June 10th, 2010 at 11:33 pm, William said:
    Girls are curvier, softer, and prettier.
    Men are bigger, harder, stronger, rougher.
    Viv le difference!!!!!

    YOWSA!!
    And if you got them, flaunt them!!

  13. #113
    On June 11th, 2010 at 6:53 pm, BrianNY said:

    I would like to go on record, right now, to say that I have always subscribed to Michelle Malkin for the articles.

    But on a more serious note, Sarah Palin is one good-lookin’ American, and I have always suspected that this undeniable, sub-conscience fact drives the pervs on the left shat-bit.

  14. #114
    On June 12th, 2010 at 7:29 pm, Dimsdale said:

    The Dems can go to bed with the thought of Helen Thomas in that blouse. Me, I will stick with Sarah!

    Andrew Sullivan is just jealous, and wishes he had an “upper musculature” that nice.

  15. #115
    On June 14th, 2010 at 4:15 pm, UglyBagOfMostlyWater said:

    I don’t know whether or not the rumors are true, and I do believe any media outlet that chooses to report this as news is inviolate of the rules of good taste and proper decorum.

    All that aside, I will say this… they look fantastic.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Jimmy Fallon: Obama ‘booked himself’ on my show

May 22, 2012 01:43 PM by Doug Powers

47 Comments

Invitation to offer invitation graciously accepted

Noted MSNBC mocker of Sarah Palin’s intellect doesn’t do so well on Jeopardy

May 15, 2012 10:33 AM by Doug Powers

82 Comments

Glass houses, stones, etc.

CNN sees lowest ratings in a decade

May 2, 2012 02:34 PM by Doug Powers

67 Comments

Well, not quite that bad

Reuters: Gore’s ‘Current’ close to getting booted from Time Warner cable due to low ratings

April 5, 2012 03:28 PM by Doug Powers

68 Comments

Minimum audience threshold in the balance


Categories: Media,Sarah Palin

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook