Shocker: Tom Brokaw Admits He’s a Democrat

By Doug Powers  •  June 29, 2010 11:00 AM

**Written by guest-blogger Doug Powers

Whenever most reporters in the mainstream media claim to be unbiased and fair and balanced “journalists,” I laugh harder than I do when I’m watching Tom Brokaw read a sentence in which every word begins with the letter L. But every now and then one whips the mask off — either on purpose or by a slip of the tongue.

In 2008, Tom Brokaw gave himself up completely and totally, bathing in the warm, healing waters of Hope & Change. Brokaw referred to Obama’s inauguration as a “velvet revolution” and made an equated The One to Jesus Christ and Sarah Palin to Pontius Pilate, but every now and then it’s refreshing to hear a longtime “journalist” admit which party has his allegiance instead of making us read between such subtle lines.

Here’s Tom Brokaw talking with Matt Lauer, and at one point Brokaw refers to a western governor as “a Democrat — from our party”:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I haven’t been this surprised since I found out Helen Thomas doesn’t celebrate Passover.

Update: Letter from a reader: I think people are taking the Tom Brokaw comment to Matt Lauer wrong…. it does not appear that he is saying that he is part of our party, meaning the Dems, rather I really think he was quoting a Western governor who said that he was losing Independents from his party and Tom put it in the Governor’s words.

Could be, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard Tom use first-person narrative when quoting a Republican.

(h/t Freedom’s Lighthouse)

**Written by guest-blogger Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

P.S. — I haven’t been able to post to Twitter since Friday, but they say somebody’s looking into it. We’ll see. To paraphrase Colbert, “If only there was some short, shallow, self-indulgent way to express my frustration.”

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Media Bias

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:03 am, tre said:

    I’m shocked, SHOCKED, to learn Tom Brokaw is a democrat!

  2. #2
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:05 am, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah the Greatest Generation’s Windbag. I’d like nothing better than to put a pillow over ole Tom while he’s napping. “Shhhhhh, now Tom . . . . Just walk towards Uncle Walter and the light . . . . just go quietly . . . . yessss that’s a good boy! . . . .

  3. #3
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:06 am, wales said:

    A democrat from ‘our’ party tells me it’s more than just the democrat party. He’s referring to the ‘progressive’ party cloaked in the democrat shield.

  4. #4
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:07 am, hawkeye54 said:

    No shocker here. Now comes the time when many so-called jouralists feel quite open about their politcal affiliations after carrying the Dems water for decades and are the faithful lackeys of TEH WON. They must feel that the Dems perpetual hold on power is in within their grasp.

  5. #5
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:08 am, letget said:

    I would more shocked to hear tom wasn’t a d!
    L

  6. #6
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:09 am, GOPGin said:

    THIS JUST IN: The Pope is Catholic.

    Didn’t need Columbo to figure that one out.

  7. #7
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:10 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Brokaw referred to Obama’s inauguration as a “velvet revolution”

    Oh yeah, then how come Obowmao the proctologist ain’t using the velvet gloves now? And would kill him to get a manicure?

  8. #8
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:11 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    The Left Wing Media is subtle? And it is necessary to “read between the lines” to determine the “reporter”‘s (aka acolyte’s) political leanings and agendas?
    ***
    Give me a break. This is like trying to determine if the Hiroshima A-bomb attack was “an enhanced event” that needed to be studied–or if it was a whole new world of hurt for our enemies!
    ***
    Let “leg tingle” Chris Matthews, Helen Thomas, and Andrea Mitchell guide you through the “subtle” reporting. Or go for the gold with good conservative web sites, talk radio, and the Fox T.V. Channel.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  9. #9
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:11 am, cheapseat said:

    all above DUH says it all. Teddy, LOL.

  10. #10
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:12 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Here’s Tom Brokaw talking with Matt Lauer, and at one point Brokaw refers to a western governor as “a Democrat Nazi — from our party”:

    FIFY

  11. #11
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:12 am, jjmurphy said:

    Who would have ever guessed?

  12. #12
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:14 am, cicerokid said:

    Velvet Revolution…Paintings of Elvis roadside come to mind.

  13. #13
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:17 am, tre said:

    I just learned the sky is blue, grass is green, and water is wet.

    I guess one DOES learn something new every day!

  14. #14
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:20 am, RTater said:

    That is a realuhy, truluhy, luhiteraluhly eluhectrifying reveluhation !

  15. #15
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:23 am, spaceycakes said:

    I would have never known, since I stopped listening to all of them, to a man, after the 2000 Presidential election. They were despicably and incorrigibly transparent in their views. Dead Peter Jennings included.

  16. #16
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:26 am, sbw999 said:

    I am shocked, as I believe that almost every member of the democrat party these days is a socialist. Thus Brokaw is lying. The “moderate democrat” has gone the way of the dodo bird.

  17. #17
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:27 am, RedDog said:

    One has an astute grasp of the obvious in saying Brokaw is a Democrat. The Great Leftist Benchmark in the industry would be Walter Cronkite who was a past master at producing Vietnam propaganda pieces (masquerading as “news”) with his pal Dan “What’s The Frequency Kenneth” Rather – complete with dubbed in war noises in the background. A splendid fraud. Splendid. But hey, it got the job done did it not? Uncle Walter must be so proud.

  18. #18
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:34 am, spaceycakes said:

    In other news, Janeane Garafolo is a Racist Redneck

    LOL

  19. #19
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:35 am, RedDog said:

    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:10 am, Rogue Cheddar said:
    Brokaw referred to Obama’s inauguration as a “velvet revolution”
    Oh yeah, then how come Obowmao the proctologist ain’t using the velvet gloves now?

    What a disgrace for him to link the Czech’s final shedding of the Communist boot in 1989 to the election of this Pocket Lenin. Brokaw should be ashamed of himself for saying such an ignorant thing. If I were Czech and could get close enough, I’d bit*h-slap him off the stage.

  20. #20
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:36 am, iamsaved said:

    I’ll bet he thought he was fooling us and decided to come clean. Please say it ain’t so. Tom Brokaw a liberal? :)

  21. #21
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:36 am, stillontheroad said:

    Wow!! Who would have thunk!

  22. #22
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:37 am, vickisoup said:

    I’m more shocked that HE’S shocked that people think the President is a failure. And he calls himself a “reporter”??
    Der.
    :roll:

  23. #23
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:40 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    I still haven’t gotten over Michelle’s revelation that she is Filipino. I’m going numb from all of the “Rosemary’s Baby” moments.

  24. #24
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:40 am, b-cat said:

    Brokaw referred to Obama’s inauguration as a “velvet revolution”

    He’s referring to Velvet Jones.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZVnve5wG0A

    He must be a racist!

  25. #25
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:41 am, Trollman said:

    Tom Brokaw didn’t just admit he was a democrat, he “outted” Matt Lauer as well – “our party.”

  26. #26
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:48 am, NeoFan said:

    Wow! Maybe next he will admit his hatred for Americans, The United States and the Constitution.

  27. #27
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:50 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Trollman said: …he “outted” Matt Lauer as well – “our party.”

    OOOO – good catch!

  28. #28
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:54 am, TooMuchTime said:

    Tom Brokaw didn’t just admit he was a democrat, he “outted” Matt Lauer as well – “our party.”

    Bingo!

    Trollman, you get today’s Blue Ribbon!

    I noticed that, too. And remember, Lauer did not disagree with Brokaw on this point.

  29. #29
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:54 am, babiesgrandma said:

    These A$$-hat$ are NOT reporters. They are news readers (the term they use in England). They don’t investigate and research anything.

    And, they all think they are among the Chosen One’s Esteemed Followers – they hope they will be appointed to numerous and sundry positions of authority, so they hang on to every word from TEH WON, and devour the table scraps and crumbs from the O-BOW-WOW feast of unfettered Marxism.

  30. #30
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:54 am, tiredofit08 said:

    As Gomer would say…surprise, surprise, surprise…NOT…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6_1Pw1xm9U

  31. #31
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:57 am, TooMuchTime said:

    Maybe next he will admit his hatred for Americans, The United States and the Constitution.

    He loves americans (from south of the border). He loves the United (Blue) States. He loves the Constitution (as a living document).

    He’s a proud democrat, after all!

  32. #32
    On June 29th, 2010 at 11:59 am, TooMuchTime said:

    These A$$-hat$ are NOT reporters. They are news readers (the term they use in England). They don’t investigate and research anything.

    Exactly. They call themselves “anchors.” If they mean a heavy weight that keeps a ship or other large object immobile, then yes. They are anchors.

  33. #33
    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:01 pm, pueblo1032 said:

    SURPRISE, SURPRISE, SURPRISE!!! Quote from that great AMERICAN, GOMER PYLE…

  34. #34
    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:03 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    I’m sure Tom’s employer is aghast over this admission of blatant bias. …NOT

  35. #35
    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:03 pm, ThatSamIAm said:

    There is no Democrat Party! It’s the Socialist Party and heading quickly towards the Communist Party. If you claim to be a Democrat you aren’t fooling anybody. There are no more moderate or conservative Democrats. Only Obama/Pelosi/Reed Socialist Progressives who defend the rights of our enemies and illegals and fight against the rights of the American people.

  36. #36
    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:08 pm, DesertLover said:

    Well …. NO DUH!!! … and Sherlock’s first clue was ????

    Sheesh!!!

    Nothing to see here … Move along …
    Just another MSM Lib stating what every intelligent American has known for many years …

  37. #37
    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:09 pm, granite said:

    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:03 pm, ThatSamIAm said:

    Exactly.

  38. #38
    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:12 pm, John Deaux said:

    Hey, look at the bright side. Olbermann has yet to commit.

  39. #39
    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:13 pm, rambler said:

    What took him so long. Now that he and his other commie friends in the media helped to create this mess he admits his true affiliations.

  40. #40
    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:20 pm, dan708 said:

    Brokaw is a Demoncrat? Next you’ll tell us Pope Benedict is Catholic.

  41. #41
    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:23 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Day 71 of the oil spill, The “war on the spill” continues, the EPA continues to obstruct, oil continues to gush, Obama refuses to rescind the Jones Act, oil is washing up everywhere, the largest, most advanced oil skimmer in the world from Taiwan is sitting idle in Norfolk, VA, while my 62 year old unemployed sister-in-law is reduced to picking up tar balls for BP.

    And all we can discuss is Tom Browkaw?

    It’s nice to see us focused on the critical issues of the day. /sarc

    And we are shocked that the Democrats kick our cans every two years.

  42. #42
    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:26 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    And all we can discuss is Tom Browkaw?

    Who called the topic police?!

  43. #43
    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:35 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Its my opinion, which the last time I checked even in the age of Obama, I get to express.

    Our country is hanging in the balance right now. A retired news guys politics is not a priority IMHO.

    Its 124 days and a wakeup until November 2.

  44. #44
    On June 29th, 2010 at 12:37 pm, GraniteMan said:

    Next we’ll find out Dan Rather is a Democrat.

  45. #45
    On June 29th, 2010 at 1:07 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    A retired news guys politics is not a priority IMHO.

    Pssst! Then don’t click the link.

  46. #46
    On June 29th, 2010 at 1:13 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Pssst! Then don’t click the link.

    Without regard to topic, I always look at what Doug has to say. You have to take time to see if there is a humorous quip. I’ve got priorities, but I’m not missing out on those. ;)

  47. #47
    On June 29th, 2010 at 1:19 pm, Dave Turson said:

    Update: Letter from a reader: I think people are taking the Tom Brokaw comment to Matt Lauer wrong…

    Check out pages 116-17 of Brokaw’s book “Boom! Voices of the Sixties.” Nixon wanted Brokaw to be his press secretary, but he turned it down by stammering that he liked his job at NBC News and his “family of FDR and Harry Truman Democrats would never understand.” He called this job offer “one of the best-kept secrets of my life in the Sixties.” Straight from the horse/donkey’s mouth — he comes from a long line of staunch Democrats.

  48. #48
    On June 29th, 2010 at 1:45 pm, T-Bone said:

    Big time reporters are water carriers for the Democrat party?

    How objective can your reporting really be?

    Its not. To control the narrative, one must control the press. Brokaw just jumped in the pile. He is a Democrat party operative. Shame on him and shame on those who relied on his objective coverage of events.

  49. #49
    On June 29th, 2010 at 1:45 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Here’s Tom Brokaw talking with Matt Lauer

    There’s a conversation that would put any insomniac to sleep.

  50. #50
    On June 29th, 2010 at 1:46 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    I’m just trying to figure out what this has to do with Chelsea.

  51. #51
    On June 29th, 2010 at 1:50 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Pasadena Phil said:
    I’m just trying to figure out what this has to do with Chelsea.

    Now you’ve done it!

  52. #52
    On June 29th, 2010 at 1:58 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Sorry, I didn’t realize Tom Brokaw was still around…haven’t listened to anything he, Katie, Matt, and all of MSNBC have said for years. They are just useful idiots for Obeyme.

    124 days and a wakeup

    > Yeah, Flyman.

  53. #53
    On June 29th, 2010 at 2:19 pm, novaculus said:

    …Brokaw referred to Obama’s inauguration as a “velvet revolution” and …equated The One to Jesus Christ and Sarah Palin to Pontius Pilate, but every now and then it’s refreshing to hear a longtime “journalist” admit which party has his allegiance instead of making us read between such subtle lines.

    Yeah, it takes real sophistication to detect their party loyalties from the nuance.

  54. #54
    On June 29th, 2010 at 2:29 pm, fighterDC said:

    I have to agree with the reader who believes he was simply quoting the western governor.

    Of course, if Tom Brokaw votes any other way than big D I would be watch out for flying swine.

  55. #55
    On June 29th, 2010 at 2:33 pm, Marc said:

    This isn’t the first time that Tom Brokaw has used the words “we” and “Our” when referring to the Democrat Party. A few days after the 2000 presidential election, the WSJ quoted Mr. Brokaw as saying: “If Gore takes this state, then we win”. Brokaw wrote an angry letter to the editor of the WSJ that was completely unconvincing. There was no question that Mr. Brokaw, tired after about 12 hours of broadcasting, slipped and let out his true feelings. When he said “we win”, it was not a rhetorical slipup. It was a Freudian slip in which his true liberalism just came gushing out in living color.

  56. #56
    On June 29th, 2010 at 2:37 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On June 29th, 2010 at 1:50 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    Pasadena Phil said:
    I’m just trying to figure out what this has to do with Chelsea.
    Now you’ve done it!

    Yeah! You leave Cankles’s mewling spawn alone you masher!

  57. #57
    On June 29th, 2010 at 2:51 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On June 29th, 2010 at 1:50 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Now you’ve done it!

    The healing hasn’t taken yet.

  58. #58
    On June 29th, 2010 at 2:53 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Tom Brokaw is a Democrat?! What will we learn next? That the sky is blue? Water is wet?

    The surprises never cease! /sarc

    :lol:

  59. #59
    On June 29th, 2010 at 3:07 pm, babiesgrandma said:

    I don’t see anything wrong with discussing Tom BrokebackMtn –

    What this does is allow us to have discourse among individuals who, upon delving further into a story and hidden cues, can start to determine who the enemy of America really is.

    I don’t call that a waste of time. America is that important to me. Sorry if someone doesn’t like the subject matter…there are alternatives to reading blogs.

  60. #60
    On June 29th, 2010 at 3:11 pm, John Deaux said:

    Flyover’s just trying to keep focus.

    Has anybody noticed how the MSM has downplayed the significance of the oil spill lately?

  61. #61
    On June 29th, 2010 at 3:52 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On June 29th, 2010 at 3:11 pm, John Deaux said:

    Has anybody noticed how the MSM has downplayed the significance of the oil spill lately?

    You mean the event that was the subject of Obama’s ONLY Oval Office speech given in prime time that The President compared to a war!

    When in the h@11 is he going to fire a single shot? On to the next item on the legislative agenda. The people in the Gulf can wait. I have America to transform.

    The lack of action and political pandering to the unions does not border on the criminal. It IS criminal. IMO

  62. #62
    On June 29th, 2010 at 4:04 pm, babiesgrandma said:

    And on a related note:

    Broadcast Evening Newscasts Lose More than 1 Million Viewers in Past Year…

  63. #63
    On June 29th, 2010 at 4:52 pm, Dave Turson said:

    From Media Bistro:

    Broadcast Evening Newscasts Lose More than 1 Million Viewers in Past Year
    Even as the oil continues to gush from the sea floor, and the networks shuttle their anchors to points along the Gulf coast, NBC Nightly News, ABC World News and the CBS Evening News continue to lose viewers. All three broadcasts were down in Q2 2010 compared to the same period last year.In numbers released today, NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams lost -440,000 viewers …

    Party allegiance is often found in the blood and bones:

    “One of you’r young Democrets ” — Brian Williams, 7 years old, in a letter sign off to LBJ.

  64. #64
    On June 29th, 2010 at 5:05 pm, tmitsss said:

    That’s just disinformation to keep the FBI from learning that he and Matt are part of the Soviet Deep Coveer Spy Ring.

    This is meant to be humorous, I hope.

  65. #65
    On June 29th, 2010 at 5:55 pm, T-Bone said:

    Has he and Matt come out of the closet yet or would that hurt his ability to persuade report?

  66. #66
    On June 29th, 2010 at 10:09 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Has anybody noticed how the MSM has downplayed the significance of the oil spill lately?

    This is only because the elite can’t stand the thought of being in Louisiana longer than it takes to do the stand-up video shoot. Jet in, film, jet out. And now you can’t even eat the shrimp.

  67. #67
    On June 29th, 2010 at 10:24 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    This reminds me, I recently saw (on PBS of all places) a young smirky reporter asking a British expert about gold – with the vocal inflections and facial contortions common to her ilk that indicated she thought buying gold was for rubes – but the expert gave a thorough explanation. I remarked to someone how knowledgeable she (the expert) was compared to the dopey talking heads on US TV.

  68. #68
    On June 29th, 2010 at 10:28 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    cicerokid said:
    Velvet Revolution…Paintings of Elvis roadside come to mind.

    I thought they got new bathrobes.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Dana Perino: Media Blamed Bush for High Gas Prices But Gives Obama a Pass

February 20, 2012 01:36 PM by Doug Powers

56 Comments

High octane double standards

MSNBC Leans Forward to Apologize to Mitt Romney

December 15, 2011 04:33 PM by Doug Powers

41 Comments

Sorry we much

Did Newt Gingrich Say the Worst Thing Any Presidential Candidate Has Ever Said?

November 21, 2011 01:02 PM by Doug Powers

159 Comments

“It’s absolutely disgusting”

Nina Totenberg: No Evidence of Anything Political About Solyndra

November 19, 2011 04:21 PM by Doug Powers

45 Comments

None at all

Media Seminar: How to Silence an MSNBC Panel 101

November 16, 2011 11:45 AM by Doug Powers

205 Comments

Just say “Solyndra”

‘Smug Shot’ from the GOP Debate

November 14, 2011 02:01 PM by Doug Powers

143 Comments

CNN’s John King Defends Joe Biden’s Honor; Demands Satisfaction

October 27, 2011 03:46 PM by Doug Powers

68 Comments

Unethical?


Categories: Media Bias

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook