Assimilation and the Founding Fathers

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 2, 2010 09:59 AM

As we head into Independence Day weekend, my column today reflects on the other “A” word missing from the immigration debate: Assimilation.

***

Assimilation and the Founding Fathers
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2010

In his immigration speech on Thursday, President Obama heralded America as a “nation of immigrants” defined not by blood or birth, but by “fidelity to the shared values that we all hold so dear.” If only it were so. Left-wing academics and activists spurned assimilation as a common goal long ago. Their fidelity lies with bilingualism (a euphemism for native language maintenance over English-first instruction), identity politics, ethnic militancy and a borderless continent.

Obama blames “politics” for the intractable immigration debate. Whose politics? The amnesty mob has taken to ambushing congressional offices this week to scream at lawmakers to choose “reform” (giving a blanket path to citizenship to millions of illegal aliens) or “racism” (their description of any and every legislative measure to stiffen sanctions for and deter the acts of border-jumping, visa-overstaying and deportation-evading).

Is there no middle ground for all sides to agree that clearing naturalization application backlogs should take priority over expanding illegal alien benefits, or that tracking and deporting violent illegal alien criminals should take precedence over handing out driver’s licenses to illegal aliens, or that streamlining the employee citizenship verification process for businesses (E-verify) and fixing outdated visa tracking databases should come before indiscriminately expanding temporary visa and guest worker programs?

Must every response to even the most modest of immigration enforcement measures be “RAAAAACIST”?

Further, as I’ve noted many times over the years when debating both Democrats and Republicans who fall back on empty phrases to justify putting the amnesty cart before the enforcement horse, we are not a “nation of immigrants.” This is both a factual error and a warm-and-fuzzy non sequitur. Eighty-five percent of the residents currently in the United States were born here. Yes, we are almost all descendants of immigrants. But we are not a “nation of immigrants.” (And the politically correct president certainly wouldn’t argue that Native American Indians, Native Alaskans, Native Hawaiians and descendants of black slaves “immigrated” here in any common sense of the word, would he?)

Even if we were a “nation of immigrants,” it does not explain why we should be against sensible immigration control. The Founding Fathers were emphatically insistent on protecting the country against indiscriminate mass immigration. They insisted on assimilation as a pre-condition, not an afterthought. Historian John Fonte assembled their wisdom, and it bears repeating this Independence Day weekend:

George Washington, in a letter to John Adams, stated that immigrants should be absorbed into American life so that “by an intermixture with our people, they, or their descendants, get assimilated to our customs, measures, laws: in a word soon become one people.”

In a 1790 speech to Congress on the naturalization of immigrants, James Madison stated that America should welcome the immigrant who could assimilate, but exclude the immigrant who could not readily “incorporate himself into our society.”

Alexander Hamilton wrote in 1802: “The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education and family.”

Hamilton further warned that “The United States have already felt the evils of incorporating a large number of foreigners into their national mass; by promoting in different classes different predilections in favor of particular foreign nations, and antipathies against others, it has served very much to divide the community and to distract our councils. It has been often likely to compromise the interests of our own country in favor of another. The permanent effect of such a policy will be, that in times of great public danger there will be always a numerous body of men, of whom there may be just grounds of distrust; the suspicion alone will weaken the strength of the nation, but their force may be actually employed in assisting an invader.”

The survival of the American republic, Hamilton maintained, depends upon “the preservation of a national spirit and a national character.” “To admit foreigners indiscriminately to the rights of citizens the moment they put foot in our country would be nothing less than to admit the Grecian horse into the citadel of our liberty and sovereignty.”

As pro-amnesty extremists moan that “we didn’t cross the borders, the borders crossed us” and illegal alien marchers haul foreign flags above Old Glory, President Obama pretends that the “common national sentiment” our Founding Fathers embraced still binds us all together. Many of us still have faith in a strong, sovereign America — the unhyphenated, the law-abiding, the gratitude-filled sons and daughters and grandchildren of legal immigrants for whom such distinctions still matter. But it’s no thanks to the assimilation saboteurs who put “one world” over “one nation under God.”

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Immigration

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 10:09 am, TigerLady said:

    This is both a factual error and a warm-and-fuzzy non sequitur. Eighty-five percent of the residents currently in the United States were born here. Yes, we are almost all descendants of immigrants. But we are not a “nation of immigrants.”

    Obowmao learned a different history than most of us. His includes the 57 states in the US among other things. Give it a few years and the history books will be re-written to reflect his version. He is so out of touch with America it’s not funny. Hoax and Chains.

  2. #2
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 10:20 am, nbarry said:

    For a classic humorous story on assimilation, read “The Education of Hyman Kaplan,” by Leo C. Rosten, about an immigrant prepping for his citizenship exam. It’s as hilarious as it is wise and patriotic.

  3. #3
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 10:27 am, stillontheroad said:

    I have first hand experience with people from SE Asia and watching them learn the Language, go to school, study their asses off, and the day they became US Citizens, they were proud and I was proud for them. What the majority of these good people went through makes you want to sit down and just listen. They did it legally. We have a class of individuals that think it is their right to break our laws and flaunt it in our faces. I have no sympathy for em, none what so ever.

  4. #4
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 10:27 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    I hope that before the knee-jerk Obama-bashing comments begin that people first remember that the reason Obama is president and that the Republican party is now cutting weeds in the distant meadows is because they tried to cram amnesty down our throats in 2006 and 2007.

    Worse yet, the gang that led that effort still controls the GOP and it is beginning to look like they will survive in November. Don’t expect anything to change in November.

  5. #5
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 10:37 am, jamesgreenidge said:

    Forget “assimulation”. That’s a bygone term. The most critical operative word here is Deportation. All together now, Dee-portation! Before your traditions and culture here are warped and diluted out of recognition forever! And no crap about can’t ship 11 million dyed-in-the-wool anchor-seed illegals back home. They shipped near that many black people here in wooden ships not all that long ago, and we got easy buses now! The Berlin Airlift showed mass transport is possible, so what are “R” pols excuse??

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  6. #6
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 10:44 am, tiredofit08 said:

    Assimilation? What’s that? 95% of the roofing companies in my area currently doing work to repair hail damage are hispanic. Darn near all of them don’t speak English and have the spanish radio stations blaring away on their cheap radios. They can be heard 2-3 houses away. The ones next to me got their plugged pulled. The owner is 80+ and hard of hearing. He didn’t know they were using his electricity. He wasn’t happy about it. So much for assimilation!

  7. #7
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 10:48 am, Savage24 said:

    Comprehensive immigration reform equals amnesty and will do nothing to secure the borders. Obama is a pathological liar, even more so than Slick Willie. Truth is foreign to these guys. I wonder if he expects the family of that dead rancher to believe that the border is the safest its been in twenty years. Do the sheriff deputies that are being shot believe it? Do rational sane Americans believe it? I think not!

  8. #8
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 10:48 am, orlandocajun said:

    If citizenship was defined by blood and birth, Obama wouldn’t have qualified to run for President.

    Muslims and Mexicans will NEVER assimilate into our culture.

  9. #9
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 10:51 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Must every response to even the most modest of immigration enforcement measures be “RAAAAACIST”?

    No, some of the more educated-or pompous, will refer to us as xenophobes. As I should have always said:xenophobia rocks!
    xenophobia
    homophobia
    islamophobia

    These three we hold dear ;) (well not Chappy, poor soul)

    Buen día

  10. #10
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 10:56 am, ThackerAgency said:

    Good article MM.

    The news today is that in our ‘War Zone’ (undeclared war) in Afghanistan, 4 people were killed in a suicide bombing attack half way around the world.

    BUT: 21 people were killed in a gunfight 12 miles south of the Arizona border today. (liberals will say guns are the problem).

    Americans are rightly frightened and the government doesn’t even recognize it. If they don’t recognize it, they won’t fix it. . . even while they demand we pay them taxes so they can ‘protect’ us.

    The thing that nobody ever says when they say ‘we are a nation of immigrants’ is that before 1960, we didn’t offer incentives for citizenship through social security or Medicare/ and welfare. The ‘nation of immigrants’ before the 60′s grew in population because people were guaranteed FREEDOM!

    If freedom was all these people wanted, I’d be fine with it. But as it stands, our government promises them our money as they encourage them to steal it even before we give it to them.

    It is insane that our government ‘representation’ is actually representing non-Americans.

    By the way, you looked fantastic on Cavuto yesterday. Happy 4th.

  11. #11
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 10:58 am, xler8bmw said:

    Actually, it is the the people fron the latin american countries that refuse to assimilate. They are the ones that have all of the associations LaRaza, MecHa etc fighting the loudest. Everytime english as a national language comes up they’re the ones protesting as well when illegal immigration comes up they’re the ones protesting. Again, this is not a immigration problem but illegal immigration. The Latin American countries are the biggest abusers of this with the largest illegal alien population. Most other immigrants that come here try to assimilate look around at the asian population. We must stop being abused by the latin american hispanic problem. They have proved time and time again they’re the majority of the problem og illegal immigration and non-assimilation. Until this nation understands that, we will never have any change.

  12. #12
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:04 am, cheapseat said:

    Amen Michelle. Without assimilation, we will surely promote civil war. I wish our educators knew anything about history, because so many of these issues we are facing have been seen before, documented results have been published, and still our educators don’t know and don’t care that they don’t know. All the wars of the past hundred and fifty years have been precipitated by one ethnic/ideologic group fighting another ethnic/ideologic group. Hell, why we are fighting in the middle east is beyond me, because these muslim (_*_) will continue killing off themselves til hell freezes, so just don’t let them travel to civilized nations. THOSE WHO DON’T KNOW HISTORY ARE BOUND TO REPEAT IT, and if only the children and grandchildren of our esteemed educators would be killed and maimed in the melle, oh well. Unfortunately we all will be affected. Just as P Phil said, we aren’t seeming to learn much from our recent past when John McCain is leading in Arizona, and Jeb Bush is back in the political dialogue. As Rush is so fond of saying, CONSERVATISM wins every time it is tried.

  13. #13
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:05 am, Speakup said:

    “Being an American is not a matter of blood or birth, it’s a matter of faith,”
    Barack Obama

    No.

    ‘Just another activist’, perverts the truth to his own ends by whatever means.
    In this case the bully pulpit.

    So than, what exactly did subject to the jurisdiction mean? Sen. Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, framer of the Thirteenth Amendment told us in clear language what the phrase means under the Fourteenth:
    [T]he provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.

    If you don’t love this country, you’re not much of a citizen, an embossed piece of paper doesn’t mean anything without the determined allegiance needed to preserve America and her Constitution.

    One worlders, foreign nationals, and their children, strictly prohibited.

    Having a hard time getting through to let your Congress critter know how much you care, some people don’t have any problem at all.

    The hotline is paid for by something called the Coalition for Comprehensive Immigration Reform and it’s being blasted to pro-open borders groups all over the country. The hotline gives its callers access to their senators that average Joes don’t have.

    Mad yet?

  14. #14
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:06 am, spaceycakes said:

    Bloomberg was on the tv this a.m. running his demented mouth about this same topic. I have something for you, Bloomers: enforce the damn laws we have in place. I am done with everyone.

  15. #15
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:08 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Someone PLEEEZE find out a way to put a “FREE BEER” sign on the White House lawn. After that speech can there be any remaining doubt Obama is just clueless about Economics 101? People do not migrate from one place to another because of politics, they do it for opportunity or to escape oppression or… to commit crime.

    Bullets from drug gang snipers are hitting the town hall in El Paso from a half mile away in Mexico and Obama is worried about politics. He is an absolute disaster, ZERO leadership skills, ZERO critical thinking skills, ZERO comprehension of prioritizing an action sequence to SOLVE a problem.

    The reason? It’s very likely that he’s NEVER actually solved one before, ( and there’s no way for us to know because he locked up even his kindergarten records). It’s foreign territory to him so he flounders talking about politics instead of taking action. The oil keeps coming toward shore, the illegals keep coming over the border but Obama sits on his throne wondering what to tell us instead of what he is going to DO.

    I’ll start a contest: Obama is alone driving a car in the middle of nowhere with no means of communication and gets a flat tire. So he ……

  16. #16
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:13 am, ThackerAgency said:

    blames the car company and makes a note to call his attorney to get the papers together to sue the racist car and tire company to make him whole. And he says he’ll create more legislation so that nobody will ever get a flat tire again.

    eventually, someone comes to save him and he complains that the stranger didn’t come to help fast enough. he concludes the stranger must be racist for taking so long to help him fix his tire.

  17. #17
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:13 am, vcallaway said:

    Contrary to naming conventions there are no native americans. To be correct it would be the first settlers. There are no humans native to north or south america.

    Like all countries the borders were set by either purchase or war. Mexico LOST, or more accurately they quit fighting. Per their long history they were too busy fighting with each other.

    So for generations the story gets told that southern California was taken from them and it really belongs to Mexico. So they feel entitled to just move there.

  18. #18
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:14 am, TigerLady said:

    Obama is alone driving a car in the middle of nowhere with no means of communication and gets a flat tire. So he ……

    uses his messianic powers to beam himself to a local hamburger joint to….

  19. #19
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:14 am, J S Ragman said:

    The comprehensive immigration reform passed in 1986, that gave millions of other illegals a quick path to citizenship, and which also included provisions to secure the border, didn’t work. What makes today’s idiots in Congress (which incidentally includes some of 1986′s idiots in Congress)think it will work this time?

    The reality is that it won’t.

  20. #20
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:15 am, ThackerAgency said:

    maybe I forgot about the whole ‘establish a commission’ of Nobel prize winners to determine a solution to flat tires.

  21. #21
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:19 am, xler8bmw said:

    This is a perfect example as to why they must assimilate. If you’re here to be a true citizen and american then this is part of being one. Stop using the PC garbage as to why the pledge shouldn’t be said. Someone’s religous or culture views have NOTHING to do with saying the pledge you’re either and american citizen standing with the country or you’re not……if not GET OUT!

    http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/24114000/detail.html

    http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/24114000/detail.html

  22. #22
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:26 am, J S Ragman said:

    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:13 am, ThackerAgency said:

    blames the car company and makes a note to call his attorney to get the papers together to sue the racist car and tire company to make him whole. And he says he’ll create more legislation so that nobody will ever get a flat tire again.

    eventually, someone comes to save him and he complains that the stranger didn’t come to help fast enough. he concludes the stranger must be racist for taking so long to help him fix his tire.

    Upon his return to Washington, he has the EPA declare vulcanized rubber a toxic substance, which is harmful to the environment. In the future, all tires must be made from recycled newspaper, which drastically shortens their lifespan, but improves the environment, as the off-white newsprint reflects solar radiation. This move is hailed as a masterstroke by the Speaker of the House, as a way to keep the print media afloat.

  23. #23
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:28 am, TanyaB said:

    Truer words were never spoken than you have written in this article Michelle!!

    Obama’s mummified body was found in his car in 2030. He was holding a mirror in one hand and a “note to self” in the other, to form a committee to find out why tires go flat.

  24. #24
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:30 am, Phredd said:

    At least Obama has a good reason for not securing the border. He doesn’t want people to think he’s a racist.

  25. #25
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:31 am, ThackerAgency said:

    Liberals talk about freedom in terms of ‘discrimination’. I just got a robocall saying that I may be discriminated against in my workplace if I have diabetes.

    I’ve seen articles that said denying health insurance coverage is ‘discrimination’. This is what caused the housing crisis. It was ‘discrimination’ for a bank to deny a loan application to someone based on their income.

    sorry to get off topic, but is it discrimination to ask someone who smokes, or doesn’t take care of themselves (diabetes, AIDS, cancer from smoking or sun exposure, eats bad food to make them fat) to pay more for insurance than someone who eats right, exercises, and takes care of their health.

    Health insurance won’t solve the obesity problem (which is a HUGE driver of health costs).

    We are so focused on ‘discrimination’ that we don’t care about the RIGHTS of Americans. Giving someone with AIDS insurance at the same price as someone completely healthy is denying the healthy person a right to lower cost coverage as a reward for living right. Deporting illegal aliens isn’t ‘discrimination’, it is protecting Americans – the only thing the feds are supposed to do.

  26. #26
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:32 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “Muslims and Mexicans will NEVER assimilate into our culture.”

    I’m going to disagree with part of that. SOME Mexicans, yes? Not all. Part of the problem with this current immigration stuff is the way the President and the media portray Mexicans as ALL Latinos and as a monolithic group. Far from the truth.

    Let’s not get ourselves caught up in the left’s lies.

    As to the idea that suddenly folks are going to assimilate, well that is just not going to happen.

    This is going to get ugly IF we who are American by birth, blood or choice, understand the idea of ONE nation under God and want to reclaim that reality. We who are ONE nation are going to have to push back against those who are not.

    It will take more than articles and laws to accomplish the goal of our national pride and national identity.

    There will be a fight.

    And for those who are saying its hispanics and Moslems, listen to Rev. Wright lately? Nation of Islam?

  27. #27
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:36 am, hawkeye54 said:

    The comprehensive immigration reform passed in 1986, that gave millions of other illegals a quick path to citizenship, and which also included provisions to secure the border, didn’t work. What makes today’s idiots in Congress (which incidentally includes some of 1986′s idiots in Congress)think it will work this time?

    Work? Of course it will work to meet the needs of the democrats and chambers of commerce to bolster the number of sheeple voters who have no clue to what it means to be independent, who will vote as they are told in the language of the place they left, encouraged to retain their cultural lifestyles, be told and believe “the white man” is holding them back, have lots of kids and be willingly dependent on government “low income” programs such as the “earned income tax credit” widely advertised in PSAs and paid for by productive taxpayers, and desperately willing to work for the lowest possible wages just to make any kind of income.

    Work? Of course it’ll work, just like the leftist, progressive dems and too many business owners want it to work.

  28. #28
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:37 am, PhredE said:

    For those that might not be aware of it…

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/lamm.asp

  29. #29
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:45 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:06 am, spaceycakes said:

    Bloomberg was on the tv this a.m. running his demented mouth about this same topic. I have something for you, Bloomers: enforce the damn laws we have in place. I am done with everyone.

    But he has saved all the world from transfat he done did! I do imagine that is what the Founders and the men of the Continental Army were all about: saving us from transfat. Yes when the women of the household were churning butter, rendering down bear, cow and any other fat they could over open fires I can hear it now: Who will save us from transfat?

    And now that the Mouth of New York has saved all the world from transfat he can afford to use his citizens money to sting gun shops in Carolina.

    It must be the water or perhaps the transfat.

  30. #30
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:46 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “Of course it will work to meet the needs of the democrats and chambers of commerce to bolster the number of sheeple voters who have no clue to what it means to be independent.”

    Sorry and I have made this point before, work how? This plan does not work. The assumption in all these schemes about why the left is pro-amnesty and open borders is the economic engine of this country stays constant. They’ll have a voter block so they can stay in office, so they can continue to increase taxes, to continue to force socialism on a once great country.

    But, and in one way this is good news, the economic engine is NOT a given. As we can see already in today’s world. The assumption that at the end of the day the economic engine that provides the resources to empower the left will be present is FALSE.

    All of the rest of their house of cards and these schemes that everyone seems to be selling on the right come tumbling down in the face of this reality: no money, nothing works.

    We’ve already over spent beyond imagination to make the current pretend world appear to work.

    So no none of this “works”. Why the right creates these incredibly fear based schemes as IF they will actually have a snow ball chance of coming to pass is difficult to understand. Unless its about selling books and booking face time on Glen Beck.

    We are conservatives because how we see government is that it is the only form of government that actually works.

    Quite acting like somehow what the left is attempting to do will work at any level.

    Greece anyone?

  31. #31
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:50 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “enforce”

    That is THE question isn’t it. Why aren’t current laws being enforced. Obama wants to frame this as we need “new” laws. We don’t need new laws. We need the existing laws to be enforced. Why aren’t current laws being enforced at state and federal levels.

    California on its books already has laws almost exactly the same as AZ’s 1070. Isn’t that amazing.

    1. First secure the border. Really secure it.

    2. Find out why current laws aren’t enforced and start enforcing current laws. Not some new legislation dropped in Congress.

    Those 2 things are all we need to do.

    Its not rocket science.

  32. #32
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:56 am, TanyaB said:

    Is there anything the government is supposed to do that it does? It is so busy being in the citizens personal life, what we eat, what we wear, if we smoke, if we wear a seatbelt, and on and on, that they have no time to protect us from enemies foreign and domestic. It is “can I be re- elected”, not what do the people need to be safe to persue life, liberty, and persue happiness.

  33. #33
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:00 pm, rambler said:

    The new assimilation is that we are supposed to assimilate to the open border mindset rather that the illegals assimilating to our culture. The values put forth by the founding fathers are not considered to be politically correct by our ruling elites.

  34. #34
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:00 pm, J S Ragman said:

    jsmiddleton4

    That is pretty much my point. The 1986 “Amnesty to End All Amnesties” was about as effective as World War I being the “War to End All Wars”. Unless and until we start enforcing the laws on the books, any new laws would find a better use being wrapped around the toilet paper roll in my bathroom.

  35. #35
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:03 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Greece anyone?

    No, not if it contains transfat.

  36. #36
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:08 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Sorry and I have made this point before, work how?

    Perhaps I should have put a sarc tag on my comments or ” ” on work. Of course amnesty will not “work”, as it did not “work” in ’86. I’m sure with a new amnestey there will be, as before, no real effort to control the borders, entry points and enforce current immigration laws.

    It only “works” in that the dems believe this is all about power and control, and with some the internal destruction of the USA as global economic and military power.

  37. #37
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:17 pm, fgmorley said:

    It isn’t just the new mexi-illegals that aren’t in the mood to assimilate. Don’t forget the blacks that live in Oakland who want ebonics taught in our schools because nobody speaks English where they live. Or the pseudo-citizens/moochers that attend any of many so-called elite universities that want to tear the country apart. They want DIVERSITY, not assimilation. Until the pukes that want to sponge off of the producing element are eliminated we’re in for a long culture war, and a very uncivil one at that.

  38. #38
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:19 pm, rambler said:

    Amnesty needs to be dropped totally. Anyone here illegally gets NO path to citizenship EVER!!! No reward for law breaking. Past amnesty programs gave us more illegals. There has to be a firm punishment and deterrent for those who break the law. Why stay here to be caught and then not get a reward of citizenship. They will self-deport and get in line. Anything given too freely will never be valued by those who receive it. Immigrants should have to work hard to become eligible for it. They have to be motivated to be part of our society. Then and only then will they value living here. Our non-assimilating immigrants are just parasites, taking jobs and sucking money out of the economy to send home. We have encouraged them further by learning their languages since they are too lazy, resistant or stupid to learn ours. English is the one thing we have in common and illegals have destroyed that too. They need to learn english or get out. Go home!

  39. #39
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:21 pm, right_on said:

    Why do our elected officials sit idly by while this Commandant-in-Chief spews untruths, contradictions, false accusations, and outright lies? Will any man or woman of ethical substance stand up anew, and shout to all that will listen…..”LIAR!”

    I’ve been more than patient…have you? This silence is more than “decorum“, it is cowardice, combined with a lack of conservative values. No “politician” who refuses to stand up and call a spade a spade, or stand for the truth, is worth putting or re-electing into office. Name names!

    I don’t care if it’s not PC…I don’t care if it violates some misguided code of decorum…I don’t care if you lose cherry committee appointments…I DON’T CARE!! Show some grit. Show some leadership. Show some patriotism. Show America who the real villians are in this country!

    America loves whistle-blowers that expose corruption. The problem is, we never hear from elected officials, facts about who said or did what that is in violation of law. Whimpering utterances are all we get, if anything at all, and then the weaklings won’t divulge information to back it up.

    It’s time for our patriotic officials to “man up” or get out.

  40. #40
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:21 pm, spaceycakes said:

    1. First secure the border. Really secure it.

    We can’t. It’s so vaaaast. (read both with Winona Ryder’s very bad accent in Bram Stoker’s Dracula).

  41. #41
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:23 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    The 1986 “Amnesty to End All Amnesties” was about as effective as World War I being the “War to End All Wars”.

    Well, IIRC, at the time, the world, mostly the europeans, had never before experienced a war of such magnitude and destruction. The effects and results of tht Great War were so horrific that one might understand why it was called the “War to End All Wars”. So many couldn’t imagine that a civilized people could possibly engage in or endure nor survive such a conflict at that level of barbarism ever again.

    It only took about 20 years to prove that they were wrong.

  42. #42
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:31 pm, TanyaB said:

    What is really maddening is we tried to tell these people that were hopey changy, that Obama and his menions were going to bring disaster to this country. But there was no telling them. Now they see elections have consequences, and I hope that they have learned something. Don’t jump on a bandwagon because some idiot smiles nice, or whispers sweet nothings via a teleprompter. Listen to the message, then look at his background, look at his friends and associates. Dig into the truth. Don’t be a sucker for a guilt trip, or fall for a “first in History” speech. “first latino, first woman, first black, first anything!! I mean so what? Will they be a good leader, or will they sell us out. Remember this … Remember what the democrats do when they get into power. I have never in all my life, (I’m almost 74) I have never seen anything even near this. I have never seen our country on the verge of falling, because of enemies within.
    Like dropping charges against Black Panthers that were intimdating voters.
    Unheard of!! God deliver us from evil..

  43. #43
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:34 pm, MacEamonn said:

    So are the people at this rally some of those who “The One” says believe in our “fidelity to the shared values that we all hold so dear.”

    L.A. Teacher Calls for Mexican Revolt in the U.S.

    I don’t know what “The One” and his followers have been smoking or injecting, but what ever it is they needs to stop because it’s causing them to suffer major hallucinations.

  44. #44
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:53 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Excellent column/post, Michelle!

  45. #45
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 12:55 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Many of us still have faith in a strong, sovereign America

    It’s enlightening to search politicians’ speeches for the words “sovereign” and “sovereignty”.

    Not many of them talk about it. A small handfull do.

  46. #46
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 1:01 pm, Speakup said:

    (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government.” George Washington

  47. #47
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 1:10 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “Many of us still have faith in a strong, sovereign America.”

    If so you will be disappointed at some point. My faith is in a God who is both sovereign and personal. Not in any country.

  48. #48
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 1:11 pm, max said:

    Obama is alone driving a car in the middle of nowhere with no means of communication and gets a flat tire. So he ……

    removes one of his jug ears, straps it on the rim and drives off (one-eared) into the sunset…

  49. #49
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 1:16 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Alexander Hamilton wrote in 1802: “The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education and family.”

    This is precisely what progressives are trying to kill. This is what they plan to destroy as part of their take-over of the United States of America. It is at the core of their attack plan.

  50. #50
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 1:17 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    L.A. Teacher Calls for Mexican Revolt in the U.S.

    That kind of talk’s been happening here for 20 years or so. Sadly, there may come a time soon when someone takes it seriously enough to act on the call.

  51. #51
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 1:22 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, the importance of Hamilton’s words regarding unchecked immigration of foreigners should also be put in the context that he is the only founding father that I know of that was an immigrant. Born in Nevis the British West Indies he saw the inequities of other countries and pulled himself up by his bootstraps serviving under Washington during the Revolutionary War and then in his Cabinet as the first Secretary of the Treasury. He along with Madison and Jay are the authors behind the Federalist Papers so his words regarding immigration and its meaning to our republic are probably the ones we should hear the loudest.

  52. #52
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 1:22 pm, Mach1Duck said:

    Comprehensive Immigration Reform, enforce the existing laws.

  53. #53
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 1:35 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Comprehensive Immigration Reform, enforce the existing laws.

    That’s the ticket.

  54. #54
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 1:37 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah

    Obama is alone driving a car in the middle of nowhere with no means of communication and gets a flat tire. So he ……

    flattens the other three tires and the spare so there is social justice for all his black bruvvers!

  55. #55
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 1:42 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah what ICE should be doing is start with the folks theyscoop up and they get the first numbers to get back inline behind everyone there currently. They will be processed in order of these numbers. Hand the numbers out at border crossings going back into Mexico. Expect a mass exodus by self deportation. Otherwise give them all amnesty but they are not ever allowed to vote!

  56. #56
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 1:46 pm, madshark said:

    The survival of the American republic, Hamilton maintained, depends upon “the preservation of a national spirit and a national character.” “To admit foreigners indiscriminately to the rights of citizens the moment they put foot in our country would be nothing less than to admit the Grecian horse into the citadel of our liberty and sovereignty.”

    Good column, Michelle.

    Question: Is the Grecian horse the same as a Trojan horse? I’ve never heard the terminology before, and a quick Google Search didn’t provide me with the answer.

    Thanks for the link, #30. It’s hard to believe that the speech was given by a Democrat governor.

  57. #57
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 2:32 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Is the Grecian horse the same as a Trojan horse? I’ve never heard the terminology before

    I would think that would be Hamilton’s meaning. It’s believed that the only way to destroy or change the USA will be from the inside. Indescriminate, or possibly, deliberate, subversive, immigration will do the job.

  58. #58
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 2:37 pm, letget said:

    On these illegal aliens=foxnation.com–fed judge lets mexico have voice on AZ law. This WHOLE thing is beyond belief!
    L

  59. #59
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 2:41 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    This WHOLE thing is beyond belief!

    With all the progressives infecting education, law and government, nothing is beyond belief anymore.

  60. #60
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 2:46 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “nothing is beyond belief anymore.”

    That is correct. And things that previously could have been labeled “unbelievable” are going to increase as Nov 2010 approaches.

  61. #61
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 2:49 pm, graysonret said:

    Amnesty. A law-breaker, who is known to have broken the law, is ignored by police, and is able to profit from his crime, by getting benefits and jobs. This person has children so it is the liberal’s belief that all should be forgiven and be allowed to continue to profit…for the sake of the children. I know a couple with children. He’s out of work, broke, lost his home, car and struggles to make ends meet on a daily basis, with help from friends too. Now, say, finally, he gives up and robs a Bank of America. BOA won’t miss it. He steals the money and spends it on his family. Based on the liberals’ beliefs, he should be ignored, and allowed to keep the money. Eventually, soon, he should be granted amnesty…again for the sake of the children. Evem if he is caught, he should be held for a few hours and sent back home, to rob the bank again, in 1-2 days. I see no difference between the two. Well, there is one, on 2nd thought. He speaks fluent English and no Spanish.

  62. #62
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 2:53 pm, 24Klady said:

    I’ve heard nothing but this same claptrap out of politicians my whole adult life…we need more immigrants and obligated to open our doors to any and all. No, we’re not obligated to do any such thing. No, we need people that want to become a part of this country and not stake out another province for their home countries.

    Politicians are environmental pollution and should be labeled as HazMat!

  63. #63
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 2:59 pm, Lindsay said:

    Excellent column, Michelle.

    If BO does not want Arizona law then he should enforce the federal illegal immigration law—and stop confusing legal immigrants with illegal aliens.

  64. #64
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 3:11 pm, tomshup said:

    Michelle,

    Well done!

    I have to digress to say how much I miss your influence at Hot Air! It’s not the same and the tabloid nature of some of Ed’s and other’s items are getting old and very boring. I don’t have to read the headlined stories and skip many, but the trend is not good.

    Happy Independence Day!

  65. #65
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 3:14 pm, 24Klady said:

    ummm, where did #68 go? There’s Lindsay #67 and tomshup #69. Was somebody naughty?

  66. #66
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 3:26 pm, Sea_Dog said:

    On July 2nd, 2010 at 10:27 am, stillontheroad said:

    I have first hand experience with people from SE Asia and watching them learn the Language, go to school, study their asses off, and the day they became US Citizens, they were proud and I was proud for them. What the majority of these good people went through makes you want to sit down and just listen. They did it legally. We have a class of individuals that think it is their right to break our laws and flaunt it in our faces. I have no sympathy for em, none what so ever.

    Less than a mile from the White House stands a Granite Wall with the names of four of my friends on it. All four were serving in the US Armed Forces, though they were not citizens, but were going to be eligible at the end of service. They were given their citizenship posthumously. For anyone, let alone the President, advocate blanket amnesty is an insult to these and others that chose the correct path. Shame Mr. President, Shame.

  67. #67
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 3:26 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Amnesty. A law-breaker, who is known to have broken the law, is ignored by police, and is able to profit from his crime, by getting benefits and jobs.

    And whose presence and conduct here in the USA is aided, justified, and useful as tools by the leftist leaders in government, unions, business and, most regrettably, church organizations t o further their own causes, and whose interests evidently outweigh the interests of our nations citizens and the nations survival.

  68. #68
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 3:30 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Shame Mr. President, Shame

    TEH WON and his ilk know no shame, unless it is the shame of getting caught doing something illegal or unethical, and often not even then. They are able to justify just about everything they do.

  69. #69
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 3:46 pm, Flyoverman said:

    I would love to have an exchange between the AZ state senator who crafted their immigration bill and Obama. He is one tough, smart, fearless guy, who knows the immigration issues cold. He look right into the camera and at point blank range called the President on Fox News.

    He would shred Barry in a debate. He knows how to handle a thug.

  70. #70
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 3:51 pm, Sea_Dog said:

    On July 2nd, 2010 at 3:46 pm, Flyoverman said:

    I would love to have an exchange between the AZ state senator who crafted their immigration bill and Obama.

    I agree, watching him last night, I just wanted to tell Janet Reno Jr. to bring it on! ‘Course, Jr. was in Afghanistan talking to their leaders about corruption and how not to get caught.

  71. #71
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 3:58 pm, Sea_Dog said:

    OT: A WEAK NON-TROPICAL LOW PRESSURE AREA…ASSOCIATED WITH A FRONTAL ZONE…CONTINUES OVER THE EXTREME NORTHEASTERN GULF OF MEXICO. THE LOW IS FORECAST TO MOVE SLOWLY TOWARD THE WEST-SOUTHWEST OR WEST DURING THE NEXT DAY OR TWO. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT…IF ANY…WILL BE SLOW TO OCCUR. THERE IS A LOW CHANCE…10 PERCENT…OF THIS SYSTEM BECOMING A TROPICAL OR SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 48
    HOURS.

    Right across the oil spill – I guess The One finally gets his wish – he’s dallied so long that inevitable storm may have arrived.

  72. #72
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 3:59 pm, Flyoverman said:

    We all have to get direct in our actions.

    We need to confront those who jsut dance around evry issue trying to dodge, duck and confuse us.

    My question to Obama and Holder, “You took an oath and are legally obligated to enforce the laws of the United States passed by the U.S. Congress. At this point I don;t care who may have not enforced these laws in the past. I want to know why you will not enforce them now?”

    If you refuse to enforce the and fulfill the duties of your office, why don’t you just do the honorable thing and resign?”

  73. #73
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 4:09 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    He would shred Barry in a debate. He knows how to handle a thug.

    Quite so…but TEH WON would never debate a state senator. It’d be beneath his pay grade : )

  74. #74
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 4:25 pm, spaceycakes said:

    24Klady–it wasn’t me being naughty. This time.

  75. #75
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 4:33 pm, roadrage said:

    I’m pretty sure that aiding and abetting an invading force is grounds for treason in the US.

    If in November, conservatives regain majorities in congress, but don’t have the spine to reverse the damage that has been done by this administration, then we’re totally screwed.

    Having the control and the means to fix this crap means NOTHING if you don’t take action.

    The Kenyan in Chief is an ENEMY OF AMERICA, period. He should be arrested, tried and hanged, along with his cabinet, czars and most of congress. You can throw McCain and Miss Lindsey in the fire too, as they’ve aided and abetted this invading force as well.

  76. #76
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 4:55 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    HORSE SH%T. WHO GIVES A FLYING FART WHAT THOSE SLAVE OWNERS THOUGHT ABOUT HOW IMMIGRANTS SHOULD BEHAVE?

    In most of the country in the 18th century, you couldn’t be Catholic without getting run out of town, and I don’t recall ever reading about a founding father objecting. Give me a break.

  77. #77
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 5:00 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Leftist morons like RSS and Chappy are cheering the construction of a new Balkans right here in the USA.

    Ask a Bosnian or Croat how they feel about “diversity?” Go ahead. I dare you!

    Ask an Arizona ranger named Jimenez or Santos how they feel about illegal aliens and drug-runners destroying their property and livelihood and invading their homes. Go ahead. I dare you!

    Amnesty won’t make anything better for law-abiding Americans of any heritage.

    Enforce existing laws and the majority of illegal aliens will self-deport in short order. It is that simple.

    Build the wall and they won’t come…

  78. #78
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 5:08 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    The starting point of the path to US citizenship must be the SAME for all foreigners – back in their home country.

    It’s just that simple.

    I think the reverse of amnesty would work: In two weeks whoever we catch being in our country illegally will NEVER be allowed back in let alone ever become a US citizen. Announce THAT and see how many run back to wherever they came from.

  79. #79
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 5:09 pm, 24Klady said:

    spaceycakes #80
    A Friday without spacey being naughty is a Friday without any fun at all. ;)

  80. #80
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 5:13 pm, 24Klady said:

    I’m afraid that a poll showing 80-99% of U.S. citizens against amnesty would have absolutely no bearing on the decisions made in D.C.. They have elevated their thinking that only what they want is valid and we (those pesky taxpayers) should have no voice.

  81. #81
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 5:40 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Build the wall and they won’t come…

    Issue an order that anyone seen crossing the border with a weapon can be shot on sight would help too.

  82. #82
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 6:16 pm, txvet2 said:

    O

    n July 2nd, 2010 at 4:55 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    You’re on the wrong website. You’re looking for DU.

  83. #83
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 6:31 pm, 24Klady said:

    Was over at Newsmax reading Dick Morris’ take on the fight that ‘Bambi wants over immigration, since it’s too late to push it through. However, some of his other takes sound just like you and I pounding our heads against walls. No amnesty, but a guest worker program (I’m guessing they get to go home every now and then for a spell), fair wages with the employer footing the bill for healthcare, severe penalties for employers found hiring them (failed to mention so many are sub-contracted out), and when the jobs dry up they’ll self deport.

    Barrythemessiah wants amnesty knowing full well that when they are legal and drawing fair wages the employer will suddenly find it to the betterment of their company to at least hire someone that can write their own name. We’ll be completely supporting 12-20 million and their offspring because they’ll be deemed unhirable and on total welfare.

  84. #84
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 6:49 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    now isn’t this just lovely…

    http://blog.heritage.org/2010/06/21/a-broken-immigration-court-system/

    Mark Metcalf’s research on the deceptive statistics released by the Justice Department is quite shocking. From 1996 to 2008, the U.S. allowed 1.8 million aliens (many of them here illegally) to remain free upon their promise to appear in court when their cases were scheduled to be heard, and 736,000 of them never showed up for their hearings. After 9/11, court evasion by illegal aliens exploded — from 2002 to 2006, over 50 percent of all aliens summoned to court disappeared.

  85. #85
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 7:08 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Issue an order that anyone seen crossing the border with a weapon can be shot on sight would help too.

    mmmm-I’ll get back to you.
    But I would like to see a concerted effort to clean out a few parks and wilderness areas occupied by coyotes and drug smugglers. Closing off parts of my country to accommodate gang bangers is irritating to the max.

    Follow me?

  86. #86
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 7:22 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Red State Skeptic said:
    HORSE SH%T. WHO GIVES A FLYING FART WHAT THOSE SLAVE OWNERS THOUGHT

    I think we may have found the missing #68…

  87. #87
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 7:24 pm, spaceycakes said:

    I don’t recall ever reading about a founding father objecting. Give me a break.

    So, shall we dig one up then? And charge the mouldering corpse with some crime?

  88. #88
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 7:31 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On July 2nd, 2010 at 7:08 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Follow me?

    Yes I do. I am aware of AZ’s Federal “Sanctuaries.”

  89. #89
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 7:40 pm, T-Bone said:

    Heres an idea on amnesty. Lets take a vote of the people.

    Oh yeah, and the results stand. One liberal in a court room somewhere does’t get to veto the vote of all the people.

    Funny thing is, we know what the result of that vote would be already.

  90. #90
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 7:51 pm, 24Klady said:

    spaceycakes #93
    There’s the Friday spacey we were out on a search and rescue mission trying to find ;)

    ‘assimilation-and-the-founding-fathers’
    When most people make the decision to leave an old country and pledge their loyalty to a new country they do it with a look to the future. This is a choice made freely. The millions we have here now have no loyalty to the U.S. nor wish to assimilate. It’s only a place to use on your road somewhere else. They relish in the arms of the same culture that discriminates against them, fails to provide education and medical, and will do everything they can to make the new country just like the old one.

    I’m told thousands have gone on to Canada. Do they fly the Mexican/Central/South American flags there too? Does Canada, or any other country they’ve immigrated provide bilingual education for their children? Do those other countries qualify them for welfare and other benefits? Are they arrogant and bold enough to hold marches demanding the same rights as citizens of those countries? I’m curious to know if they stomp all over the other countries they’ve invaded differently than they do when they come here?

  91. #91
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 8:13 pm, jrgdds said:

    Presione 2 para español

  92. #92
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 8:41 pm, Dimsdale said:

    One Teddy Roosevelt, around 1918-1919:

    “In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag… We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language… and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”

    “It is our boast that we admit the immigrant to full fellowship and equality with the native-born. In return we demand that he shall share our undivided allegiance to the one flag which floats over all of us.”

    “Every immigrant who comes here should be required within five years to learn English or to leave the country,” he said in a statement to the Kansas City Star in 1918. “English should be the only language taught or used in the public schools.”

  93. #93
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 9:39 pm, BrianNY said:

    #82 red state skeptic said:

    I don’t recall ever reading about a founding father objecting (to Catholic bigotry.) Give me a break.

    I don’t recall ever reading about you objecting to child rape…by your own logic, should I be concerned?

  94. #94
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:16 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    Recently I was banned from a motor scooter discussion board for “racist, hateful, and insensitive [remarks] on so many levels.” My crime? Identifying a lawn care “professional” who knocked down two motor scooters with a riding lawn mower and couldn’t speak English as a probable illegal alien. The excuse was that I offended several moderators and “many” other members of the discussion board. On the other hand, I received several PMs before my banishment supporting my stance and thanking me for “speaking the truth.”

    Guess if I get back on that board that “speaking the truth” is something I’ll need to resist.

    ECS

  95. #95
    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:21 pm, Leatherneck said:

    I flunked compassion training myself.

    Dam illegal aliens sucking off the sugar tit. Marxists!

  96. #96
    On July 3rd, 2010 at 1:56 am, 11B said:

    If you are going to invoke the Founders, then it is probably a good idea to look at the Naturalization Act of 1790.

    The notion that the Founders wanted America to be open to the whole world is ridiculous, unless one considers people like Edward Kennedy and Emanuel Celler Founders.

  97. #97
    On July 3rd, 2010 at 2:17 am, tiredofit08 said:

    On July 2nd, 2010 at 11:16 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    Guess if I get back on that board that “speaking the truth” is something I’ll need to resist.

    I’m sure there are other boards…that one sounds one that I’d avoid…a lefty motor scooter board…who’d have thought…

  98. #98
    On July 3rd, 2010 at 9:01 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Had just a loverly Friday-two major projects needed doing, brutally hot here-115^- and I did not have time to listen to any news from Bambi, Amnesty McCain or any other weakling drivel.

    But early this morning (first light about 4:30) and put up MY American flag-the Gadsden. The situation is revolting and the Don’t Tread On Me flags do seem appropriate. I do know Chris “Thrill” Matthews considers flying the Gadsdens to “be like those people who fought the British”. Clever lad isn’t he?

    These Progressives, New World Order Under a Credible United Nations types, One World/No Borders twits can go to hell this fine day. I shall fly my Bitter Clinger flags this three day week-end and love a country, people and ideal those clowns can not even imagine. Sadly millions do not even know what they lost, gave away and never even realized they had.

    Have a Great Fourth of July and only worry about the weenies on the grill-the others do not matter.

  99. #99
    On July 3rd, 2010 at 9:45 am, txvet2 said:

    On July 3rd, 2010 at 9:01 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    If any of your local illegal migrants are having trouble deciding where to mooch next, Philadelphia’s available.

  100. #100
    On July 3rd, 2010 at 9:46 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    As we prepare to celebrate the 234th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4th, 1776, let us take some time to consider what our Founders were thinking and doing in the months leading up to that event. It’s amazing the parallels between then and now…

    IN times of impending calamity and distress; when the Liberties of America are imminently endangered by the secret machinations and open assaults of an insidious and vindictive Administration, it becomes the indispensible duty of these hitherto free and happy Colonies, with true penitence of heart, and the most reverent devotion, publickly to acknowledge the over ruling providence of God; to confess and deplore our offences against him; and to supplicate his interposition for averting the threatened danger, and prospering our strenuous efforts in the cause of Freedom, Virtue and Posterity…

    Read the whole document here (included within a post I wrote):

    In Congress, March 16, 1776

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook