Ken Salazar needs another ass-kicking

By Michelle Malkin  •  July 16, 2010 10:42 AM


All hat, no cattle

Ken Salazar needs another ass-kicking
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2010

When President Obama picked former Democrat Sen. Ken Salazar as his
Interior Secretary last year, the Coloradan donned a 10-gallon hat and
dubbed himself the “new sheriff in town.” But Cowboy Ken is the one
who needs to be run out on a rail. In his continued quest to shut down
offshore drilling, Salazar has run roughshod over scientific
integrity, transparency, and the Gulf Coast economy.

Two federal courts have batted down the White House-approved,
Salazar-directed drilling moratorium. Outraged scientists — appointed
by the Obama administration, mind you — blasted Salazar for
doctoring their work and contradicting their conclusions to bolster
his manufactured case for the sweeping six-month ban. Undaunted,
Salazar conjured up a “revised” moratorium rubber-stamped by oil spill
czar Michael Bromwich, who sheepishly admitted that the new ban was
“roughly congruent with the original moratorium.”

The sham changes would permit some drilling rigs to re-start
operations – but only under onerous, fantasyland testing conditions
that industry leaders say would be virtually impossible to meet. In
short, Salazar’s “new” moratorium is a lot like Salazar himself: All
hat, no cattle.

The Interior Secretary then strode into the first hearing of the
presidential oil spill commission this week to tell the panelists that
he wanted their work to “inform” his book-cooked deepwater drilling
ban. It was, essentially, Salazar guiding the dog-and-pony show
participants to bark and neigh on command. The panelists were
“stunned” by Salazar’s explicit expectation of policy support,
according to hearing observers, because weighing in on the moratorium
had not been a part of their original mandate.

None of the panelists, conveniently enough, has actual technical
expertise in deepwater drilling. So on what, exactly, can they
“inform” Salazar? No doubt Salazar and his superiors at 1600
Pennsylvania Avenue have soaked up the online anti-drilling rants of
prominent oil spill panelist Frances Beinecke. She’s a leading
official at the rabidly anti-corporate Natural Resources Defense
Council, where she publicly called for offshore drilling bans five
times over the past two months before snagging a seat on Obama’s
“expert” panel. NRDC was one of the leading environmental lobbying
voices pushing for the commission in the first placde. The eco-tail is
wagging Team Obama’s dog.

The good news is that not all the panelists are rolling over.
Co-chairs William Reilly and Bob Graham absorbed an earful from local
residents, small business owners, and public officials from the Gulf
region this week. Louisiana Democrat Sen. Mary Landrieu decried the
economic devastation Salazar is overseeing: “Even the revised
moratorium will force thousands of hardworking Louisianans and others
along the Gulf Coast into the unemployment lines.” Lafourche Parish
(La.) President Charlotte Randolph blasted the zero-risk tolerance
mentality of Salazar and Beinecke, illustrating the folly behind the
offshore drilling moratorium: If “safety” demands a blanket halt to
deepwater drilling, she said, then all oil tanker traffic in the Gulf
of Mexico should be halted, too. “An oil tanker is a four times
greater risk of spilling its cargo than an oil well blowing out,”
Randolph pointed out. “Tankers carrying 3 million barrels of oil
traverse the Gulf daily en route to Houston.” That’s roughly the
amount of oil BP spilled over the last three months.

After the first hearing this week, Reilly openly challenged the White
House foot-dragging on 33 oil rig safety assessments, wondering “why
it’s going to take so long to convince people the existing rigs are
safe.” For his part, Graham blasted the “disconnect between Washington
and the Gulf region about the sense of urgency needed.”

In Washington, at least one watchdog has pegged Salazar as a crooked
shooter. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Ranking
Member Darrell Issa exposed the Interior Secretary’s serial
obstructionism in a letter released Thursday on Salazar’s failure to
comply with 45 document requests related to the feds’ post-spill
response. “The lack of cooperation is appalling for an Administration
that prides itself on transparency and openness with the American
people,” Issa noted. “Indeed, it appears that the Administration is
more concerned with hiding from the tough questions than answering
them.”

While Salazar ducks and dithers, deepwater oil drillers are canceling
contracts or moving their rigs overseas – and American jobs along with
them. Diamond Offshore moved one of its rigs to Egypt. Murphy Oil
Company is also moving operations to the Congo. And Bloomberg News
reported that “the number of offshore rigs operating in U.S. waters
has plunged 71 percent to 16 from 56 before the blowout, according to
surveys by Baker Hughes Inc.”

The new sheriff’s in town alright — and he’s shooting the Gulf Coast
economy in the foot, head, and heart. Heckuva job, Kenny.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On July 16th, 2010 at 10:49 am, stillontheroad said:

    These Bat Chain Pullers in the Obama will continue and continue and continue. They do not care, there is their agenda and they will stick with that agenda until this country wises up and not only throws them out but demand investigations and prosecutions to the fullest extent of the law. And if there is not a law, make one and get em.

  2. #2
    On July 16th, 2010 at 10:50 am, EWTHeckman said:

    Salazar obviously has no intention of following the law or paying any attention to people who actually know they’re talking about. So why is he even bothering with the charade?

    Heck, why is the Obama administration bothering to pretend they’re obeying the Constitution? We’ve already seen the “man behind the curtain”.

    P.S. Those extra returns in this post are distracting.

  3. #3
    On July 16th, 2010 at 10:52 am, SpeakEasy said:

    Since the Obama and his administration believes in ignoring FEDERAL LAW in the name of economic justice for the workers (illegal immigration) then why don’t the oil companies ignore the moratorium on the same grounds and just continue drilling? Maybe if they imported mexican roughnecks onto the rigs…….

  4. #4
    On July 16th, 2010 at 10:52 am, TigerLady said:

    None of the panelists, conveniently enough, has actual technical
    expertise in deepwater drilling. So on what, exactly, can they
    “inform” Salazar?

    Hey, no problemo. Make it up as you go. Isn’t that the Obowmao way? Doesn’t matter if it’s right or wrong. Just so the sheeple buy into it.

    Why does the tune “I shot the Sheriff” keep running through my head?

  5. #5
    On July 16th, 2010 at 10:53 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    And has anyone else noticed Obama’s transition today on the oil spill? Up to now, this was all about BP and Bush. Now the well is capped, Obama took ownership of the credit for capping it at his press conference today. It’s all about me, we, us, my administration,…. So is today the day that Bush steps down and Obama becomes prez?

  6. #6
    On July 16th, 2010 at 10:54 am, Flyoverman said:

    Salazar’s best accomplishment to date is creating GOP voters for November.

    In 108 days and a wakeup we go to the polls. Instead of trying to mitigate the damage they will receive, Obama has floored the acceleerator.

    Not a winning strategy.

  7. #7
    On July 16th, 2010 at 10:56 am, Mister P said:

    Well in order to succeed in this administration one has to be anti-American. Spreading the wealth around means being uncompetitive and dependent. I imagine Obama wants to make sure Salazar gets some graft to line his pockets.

  8. #8
    On July 16th, 2010 at 10:57 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “Obama has floored the acceleerator.”

    Yep. We can only hold on tight and get prepared to do some hard work to turn this thing around after Jan 2011.

  9. #9
    On July 16th, 2010 at 10:58 am, Ragspierre said:

    There is a consortium of idiots in DC who make law and regulation respecting an industry they don’t know anything about, in reality.

    Kwik Kenny, The Faux Paneling King, is just one.

  10. #10
    On July 16th, 2010 at 10:58 am, Mister P said:

    And has anyone else noticed Obama’s transition today on the oil spill? Up to now, this was all about BP and Bush. Now the well is capped, Obama took ownership of the credit for capping it at his press conference today. It’s all about me, we, us, my administration,…. So is today the day that Bush steps down and Obama becomes prez?

    I noticed it yesterday. What a fake?

  11. #11
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:01 am, gridlock said:

    When it comes to job losses, it’s not a but, it’s a feature.

    Every time a productive worker becomes dependent on the government, a lifetime Democrat is born anew.

  12. #12
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:03 am, swede said:

    The sham changes would permit some drilling rigs to re-start
    operations – but only under onerous, fantasyland testing conditions

    The conditions are that drillers must guarantee that no future blowouts will occur. This is tantamount to grounding all aircraft until airlines can guarantee there will never be another crash. Any engineer will tell you the concept of “fail safe” is a myth. Aircraft have redundant backup systems to backup systems – five layers deep, yet systems still fail – still, you have only about .001% chance of dying on any given flight. The safety record for offshore drilling is similar.

  13. #13
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:11 am, Ragspierre said:

    “It’s a jobs moratorium,” said Republican U.S. Rep. Bill Cassidy of Baton Rouge, who has introduced legislation to repeal the ban while calling for the safety inspection of each rig.

    “You get a sense that its part of their plan to inhibit drilling one way or another,” Cassidy said.

    Yes. Yes, you do. If you have two functioning brain cells, that is EXACTLY what you understand. Which, apparently, leaves out the Deemocrat Ed Markey, incredibly the number two man on the House Energy and Commerce Committee;

    “This moratorium will reduce oil spill risk while the Gulf will continue to produce oil,” said Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), who chairs the House Energy panel’s subcommittee on Energy and the Environment. “As new laws and safety measures are put into place on these few dozen rigs, 97 percent of the manned rigs in the Gulf will still be allowed to work,” he said.

    No, not really…not at all. See, Mr. Markey doesn’t know his ass from a cypress stump in the area in which he writes law. Or he is intentionally lying. (h/t Redstate)

    Out of the 123 [DRILLING] rigs in the U.S. Gulf fleet, 73 were under contract. Fleet utilization is 59.3 percent, the same as the week before. The number of rigs actually working in the region did fall to 33.

    Meaning that the Gulf drilling fleet is being used at a 27% rate, thanks to the actions of the Obami. Note that this is the lowest in the world. That hell-hole of environmental destruction over in Europe (including the Mediterranean) has its fleet drilling at about 88% of capacity. We all know how cavalier the Euroweenies are about safety.

    http://hindenblog1.blogspot.com/2010/07/burn-kwik-kenny-salazars-new-gulf-jobs.html

  14. #14
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:20 am, happy2behere said:

    This is very sad because prior his current post and the US Senate, Salazar was considered a decent public servant here in Colorado.

  15. #15
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:20 am, docflash said:

    La.has voted mostly for Republicans the last few years.The black vote got displaced by Katrina and can’t be counted on.La.voted for McCain in large numbers.They could care less about La.or the Gulf coast.They are stealing their money from BP since they won’t be getting much from the Gulf area.The way they play, it is payback time for La.

  16. #16
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:21 am, Mister P said:

    The conditions are that drillers must guarantee that no future blowouts will occur. This is tantamount to grounding all aircraft until airlines can guarantee there will never be another crash. Any engineer will tell you the concept of “fail safe” is a myth. Aircraft have redundant backup systems to backup systems – five layers deep, yet systems still fail – still, you have only about .001% chance of dying on any given flight. The safety record for offshore drilling is similar.

    While I agree for the most part, as an avionics engineer, I know that no reputable engineer would build wells so deep that they had no way to stop a leak. That is insane.

    But I believe the environmentalists and ignorant companies like BP are both to blame for pushing the drilling that deep.

  17. #17
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:22 am, pueblo1032 said:

    O-BOZO and his crew are batting a thousand all around… 65% agree with the AZ SB1070, DOJ sues AZ… 70% do not want a hold on GULF drilling, O-BOZO and SALAZAR have challenged the courts twice, and lost… My question is why they are not in JAIL, or at least found in CONTEMPT OF COURT over this behavior???

  18. #18
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:28 am, Ragspierre said:

    My question is why they are not in JAIL, or at least found in CONTEMPT OF COURT over this behavior???

    You are only found in contempt for violating a court’s order, as a general rule. Salazar is doing this within his area of responsibility, and no court told him he could not (nor would one, prior to this).

    As I said the other day in my piece, I doubt very much this new moratorium will withstand a court challenge.

    One of the biggest problems the Obami face is the record of their first panel, several of whom held that cessation of drilling operations is actually MORE dangerous than continuing.

  19. #19
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:31 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    Issa noted. “Indeed, it appears that the Administration is
    more concerned with hiding from the tough questions than answering
    them.”

    Here’s some tough questions:
    Why did the Obama campaign disable security features for online donations?
    How many times has he waived his own rule about not hiring lobbiests?
    Why has he always seemed to associate with and hire Socialists/Marxists?
    Why did his “Justice” Department drop the NBPP case?
    Why is he no releasing his college records?
    How did he travel to Pakistan in the 1980s?
    Why does he have a Connecticut Social Security Number?
    Where’s the Birth Certificate?!

  20. #20
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:32 am, letget said:

    This drilling ban in the gulf isn’t the only problem. Here in TX we have gobs of refineries. It seems now the epa has come here to find any little thing they can to put huge fines and could shut them down entirely. It is going to be really serious because no new refineries are ‘allowed’ to be built. More jobs are on the line as with the gulf drilling ban.
    L

  21. #21
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:42 am, BurnedOutHippie said:

    If they are going to ban oil production, then they should also ban a corresponding amount of oil consumption. Maybe Obama could show leadership by parking the 747 until the moritorium is lifted.

  22. #22
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:45 am, Ragspierre said:

    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:32 am, letget said:

    All just part of the “fundamental transformation” of America.

    More of the Unicorn engineering mandate.

  23. #23
    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:54 am, nail49 said:

    The new sheriff’s in town alright

    How Salazar imagines himself:
    http://www.themastercrayonartist.com/images/Marshall%20Dillion.jpg

    How Salazar appears to others:

    http://weblogs.wpix.com/news/lionel/barney_fife.jpg

  24. #24
    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:02 pm, iamsaved said:

    Salazar and the Obama administration is accomplishing what it set out to do.

    1. Force the drillers overseas and away from the USA shores – i.e. to Brazil where Soros friend has interests.
    2. Placate the environmentalists by banning off shore drilling and helping to drive oil prices sky high.
    3. Get a 20 billion dollar slush fund to fund their socialist programs.
    4. Retribution to the southern states for not voting for him.

    BTW, how many vacations does this make the Obama’s this year? Maine?

    I looked up the word hubris and saw a picture of the Obama’s next to the definition.

  25. #25
    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:10 pm, letget said:

    iamsaved#24,
    Drudge has this bho has had 7 vacations!It is just precious the outfit mo has on leaving the wh to get on the plane. I can not imagine any other first lady ever getting on Air Force 1 looking like that!

  26. #26
    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:17 pm, mchristian said:

    The Obama administration and Salazar have not just stopped drilling in the Gulf. Ask the people of Utah about the leases Salazar pulled just after he was installed as Energy Secretary and several other Western states about leasing for the oil shale. The dems, and some repubs, do not want domestic energy production while they harp on our dependence on foreign oil.

    http://tinyurl.com/2g2d3m8

  27. #27
    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:26 pm, rightisright said:

    As this usurper destroys our freedom loving country with his Marxist, elitist friends just when is enough, ENOUGH?
    Will they not enforce a scorched earth policy after Nov. 2nd?

    Com on America, wake up before there is nothing left.

  28. #28
    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:29 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “The conditions are that drillers must guarantee that no future blowouts will occur. This is tantamount to grounding all aircraft until airlines can guarantee there will never be another crash.”

    Given the rarity of a blow out and what would actually happen if you promised never to have one and would structure your business so you were isolated from the actually well drilling I’d say that is a promise I’d be willing to make.

  29. #29
    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:30 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “wake up”

    Have you not seen the latest polls? America is awake.

  30. #30
    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:38 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Have you not seen the latest polls? America is awake.

    This admin really has to push its agenda fast to get as much done as possible before November.

    There will be so much to be undone IF the GOP gains control of the House, IF it has the will to act….about which I’m not particularly confident. My guess is, if half or less of what the Dems put into place is undone the GOP may be self satisfied and TEH WON still wins.

  31. #31
    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:44 pm, Ragspierre said:

    There can’t be a successful tinkering with the piles of crap Obama has put on us.

    There has to be a reformation…a restoration of constitutional governance in the U.S.

    We have to be activists.

  32. #32
    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:47 pm, iamsaved said:

    Have you not seen the latest polls? America is awake.

    I saw one poll today with Harry Reid up about 4 to 7 points over Angle. Sure hope that’s wrong. If an extreme liberal like Reid wins re-election, then this country is doomed.

  33. #33
    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:51 pm, Savage24 said:

    Ken Salazar was no great shakes when the “useful idiots” in Colorado elected him to the Senate, and has not improved since. As the Obama administration’s lap dog he will continue to bark on the owner’s demand. All we can hope for is that there are enough “good sense” judges out there to keep slapping him down.

  34. #34
    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:56 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    I saw one poll today with Harry Reid up about 4 to 7 points over Angle. Sure hope that’s wrong.

    Its only one poll and its still early. Don’t know much about Angle, but if this lead still holds up or increases by the end of Sept. its troubling.

  35. #35
    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:58 pm, IndyRich said:

    Suggested photo caption:

    “Who looks great in a goofy cowboy hat??? THIS GUY!!!

  36. #36
    On July 16th, 2010 at 1:00 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Ken Salazar was no great shakes when the “useful idiots” in Colorado elected him to the Senate, and has not improved since.

    Well, if he HAD improved, he wouldn’t be part of this admninistration. He has to remain an idiot, willingly so, to continue to be useful.

  37. #37
    On July 16th, 2010 at 1:01 pm, iamsaved said:

    They could put a cigar store indian up against Harry Reid and hopefully it would win as bad as dirty Harry is.

    In Missouri they voted for a dead man who won the Senate race against Ashcroft. I know, I know, it was Democrats that did it but one can hope can’t they?

  38. #38
    On July 16th, 2010 at 1:18 pm, Shambhala said:

    On July 16th, 2010 at 11:20 am, happy2behere said:

    This is very sad because prior his current post and the US Senate, Salazar was considered a decent public servant here in Colorado.

    No he f***g well wasnt. Neither nor his brother!

  39. #39
    On July 16th, 2010 at 1:23 pm, Blackstone said:

    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:30 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    Have you not seen the latest polls? America is awake.

    Next step is to get them alert. Krauthammer’s latest is a sober-upperer.

    “For Obama, 2010 matters little. If Democrats lose control of one or both houses, Obama will probably have an easier time in 2012, just as Bill Clinton used Newt Gingrich and the Republicans as the foil for his 1996 reelection campaign.”

    In other words, 0 will get himself another “target” to “personalize” (Alinsky-style). It’s gonna be a long battle.

  40. #40
    On July 16th, 2010 at 1:34 pm, Mister P said:

    We should not rest till he and his co-conspirators are in prison.

  41. #41
    On July 16th, 2010 at 1:39 pm, angryoldfatman said:

    Hey Mary Landrieu, how ya like your bribe NOW? You got your money and now you’re getting the business from all sides and have the audacity to complain about it.

    When you act like a prostitute, you should expect to get treated like one, Mary.

  42. #42
    On July 16th, 2010 at 1:41 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Ken (Pepper) Salazar: If it’s got hair, I can ride it. If it’s got a beat, I can dance to it.

  43. #43
    On July 16th, 2010 at 1:43 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    In other words, 0 will get himself another “target” to “personalize” (Alinsky-style). It’s gonna be a long battle.

    Yup. TEH WON can dump the “blame Bush” mantra and use the “blame the GOP controlled congress” mantra.

  44. #44
    On July 16th, 2010 at 1:56 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Obama will probably have an easier time in 2012

    He won’t run.
    Several states, including Arizona, are working on legislation to require candidates to provide proof of eligibility for office to get on the ballot.

  45. #45
    On July 16th, 2010 at 2:08 pm, Truesoldier said:

    The sham changes would permit some drilling rigs to re-start
    operations – but only under onerous, fantasyland testing conditions
    that industry leaders say would be virtually impossible to meet or a nice donation to the Deocratic party or Obamas PAC as well as support for tax and cap.

    Somehow I could see that provision being a key to the moratorium.

  46. #46
    On July 16th, 2010 at 2:12 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The wheels on the bus go round and round…

  47. #47
    On July 16th, 2010 at 2:36 pm, Papa Louie said:

    “the number of offshore rigs operating in U.S. waters has plunged 71 percent to 16 from 56 before the blowout, according to surveys by Baker Hughes Inc.”

    Since BP is having to pay for the damage they caused in the Gulf, is the Obama administration going to pay for the economic damage their drilling moratorium is causing?

  48. #48
    On July 16th, 2010 at 2:39 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    You know why they are doing this. I mean COME ON is so obvious, but let me point it out for those not as observant as me.

    This is a gift to the oil rich Muslim nations. Obama wants the price of oil high and so he’s got an agreement to increase the prices for his Muslim buddies through this moratorium.

    this administration has dragged its feet since the beginning. There is no excuse for not having skimmers all over the gulf unless you didn’t really want a solution. If Obama wanted to protect Americans he would have acted entirely differently with this oil spill.

    Yeah, we get it, BP is awful. Now are we just going to cry over spilt milk or are we going to clean it up?

    by the way, high oil is the only thing that is keeping us from being in full blown deflation area. Oil is a lot higher than it should be. There is plenty of oil for the demand. I expect 20 dollar a barrel oil within 5 years.

  49. #49
    On July 16th, 2010 at 2:40 pm, iamsaved said:

    When you act like a prostitute, you should expect to get treated like one, Mary.

    Those words must sting for Stupak and the AMA also…

  50. #50
    On July 16th, 2010 at 2:58 pm, nail49 said:

    Those words must sting for Stupak and the AMA also…

    They are politicians and bureaucrats, ergo they have no conscience and thus there will be no sting.

  51. #51
    On July 16th, 2010 at 3:50 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Just wait, folks, until all this starts to cost real $$$.

    No just MUCH higher energy costs, but costs for EVERYTHING energy moves.

    AND HEALTH CARE…

    while trying to pay for it with unemployment…

    Hell is coming…

  52. #52
    On July 16th, 2010 at 3:54 pm, SHoward said:

    Since BP is having to pay for the damage they caused in the Gulf, is the Obama administration going to pay for the economic damage their drilling moratorium is causing?

    Nope, they’re making BP pay for that too.

    He also said the company had agreed to set up a separate $100 million fund to compensate oil rig workers laid off as a result of his six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling.

  53. #53
    On July 16th, 2010 at 4:18 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, like they say in Texas; 10 gallons covers a whole lot of stupid . . . . .

  54. #54
    On July 16th, 2010 at 4:23 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah,

    On July 16th, 2010 at 1:41 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
    Ken (Pepper) Salazar: If it’s got hair, I can ride it. If it’s got a beat, I can dance to it.

    Was he talking about Hon. Barbara Mikulski? I wish someone would spray some disperants on this walking oil slick.

  55. #55
    On July 16th, 2010 at 5:25 pm, SixDegrees said:

    Meanwhile, TPers score another huge victory – for Harry Reid.

    Nice job, douchebags. Congratulations on losing yet another Republican seat.

  56. #56
    On July 16th, 2010 at 5:36 pm, LarryD said:

    Past time to start files on “grounds for impeachment” on Salazar, Holder, et al.

    One could argue for impeaching all of Obama’s “czars”, just on the ground that he’s end-running around Article II, section 2, ¶ 2:

    He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.

    And, of course, this is a strike against Obama himself.

  57. #57
    On July 16th, 2010 at 5:55 pm, Blackstone said:

    On July 16th, 2010 at 1:56 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Obama will probably have an easier time in 2012

    He won’t run.
    Several states, including Arizona, are working on legislation to require candidates to provide proof of eligibility for office to get on the ballot.

    Any word on what’s happening with that bill in Arizona? I heard that it passed one house, but that was a while ago. Is it getting any traction in the Senate?

  58. #58
    On July 16th, 2010 at 5:58 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Errah, like they say in Texas; 10 gallons covers a whole lot of stupid . . . . .

    Actually, it looks more like a 5 gallon hat which doesn’t cover near enough stupid. And in Salazar’s case never will.

  59. #59
    On July 16th, 2010 at 6:10 pm, babiesgrandma said:

    Here’s a nifty thought I had. I wondered about Ken S’s brother, John Salazar, who is a US Representative from western Colorado, and what his stand was on oil drilling. You see, oil and gas drilling is going on right now in Western Colorado and is providing (for now) jobs and income to quite a few people. The jobs come and go, but it is helping Western Slope people hang on to what they have.

    Well, surprise, surprise, John Salazar’s website mentions NOTHING about oil and gas drilling and the US government’s stand on it.

    Funny, you’d think he might have been the type of person to represent his district faithfully by fighting for jobs in the oil and gas business.

    Hah. He just doesn’t take a stand on it at all.

    Just my opinion.

  60. #60
    On July 16th, 2010 at 6:49 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Like a good globalist, he is making sure jobs are moved overseas.

  61. #61
    On July 16th, 2010 at 8:26 pm, txvet2 said:

    On July 16th, 2010 at 12:47 pm, iamsaved said:

    Angle hasn’t been helping herself much. Rasmussen still has her up, but her lead has pretty much disappeared. The inevitable difficulties of running a relatively inexperienced candidate.

  62. #62
    On July 16th, 2010 at 9:10 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    The media is going to find some way to make it look like every Democrat is winning their elections come November. Get used to it.

  63. #63
    On July 17th, 2010 at 12:05 am, Republicanvet said:

    Just curious. It wasn’t long ago when leftists were making a show of taking reduced heating oil from Chavez supposedly to give to poor people who couldn’t afford it.

    What will happen to the cost of any petroleum product when oil produced from the Gulf will be effectively removed from the market?

    How much will heating oil rise because of this?

    Will any leftist care?

  64. #64
    On July 17th, 2010 at 2:00 am, prendad said:

    Oh Ken, you sly dog. You’re bucking for a pay raise aren’t you? Keep this up and, why, maybe the big O will let you ride in AF-1 and fetch him coffee.

  65. #65
    On July 17th, 2010 at 12:06 pm, RedDog said:

    On July 16th, 2010 at 10:49 am, stillontheroad said:

    These Bat Chain Pullers in the Obama will continue and continue and continue. … but demand investigations and prosecutions to the fullest extent of the law. And if there is not a law, make one and get em.

    You nailed it. These people are not incompetent, they are criminal by nature and philosophy. Jail. Now.

  66. #66
    On July 17th, 2010 at 12:18 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On July 16th, 2010 at 5:25 pm, SixDegrees Chicken Little said:

    Meanwhile, TPers score another huge victory – for Harry Reid.

    Nice job, douchebags. Congratulations on losing yet another Republican seat.

    FIFY

    Check you calendar. One CNN poll and you freak out. Get a grip, grow a pair, and get back into the fight.l

  67. #67
    On July 17th, 2010 at 12:33 pm, RedDog said:

    On July 16th, 2010 at 9:10 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    The media is going to find some way to make it look like every Democrat is winning their elections come November. Get used to it.

    Good. That means the average Democrat moron will be even less inclined to vote. Just so long as we keep the illegal Mexican vote out of the polls.

    Another reason why abortion is so popular with the Marxists, it keeps down the free-born American vote.

  68. #68
    On July 17th, 2010 at 12:43 pm, RedDog said:

    On July 17th, 2010 at 12:18 pm, Flyoverman said:

    …Get a grip, grow a pair, and get back into the fight.

    Now is the time for “ground and pound”, and don’t stop until the statists are a bloody immobile pulp. Then when the dawn rises, we have a Constitutional convention reaffirming market freedom, personal liberty, private property, and the Founding Documents. No compromise on those principles, ever.

  69. #69
    On July 17th, 2010 at 1:32 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “ground and pound”

    That’s right. And we don’t get to “ground and pound” by being alarmist and Chicken Little’s. We get there by standing tall on what we believe and know to be true, educate other folks at this most perfect storm for teaching conserviative ideals and we VOTE VOTE VOTE.

    Of course folks don’t sell books or get face time on news shows that way. But that is just the way it works I guess. We need to move forward and offer this country the positive alternative conservative ideals are. What a great time to have a contrast in place on which to bounce off of!

    Socialism vs. conservatism right in front of our very eyes. Its not just a concept any more. Its life playing out across the country.

    What a great time to be a conservative and help others learn and see the difference.

  70. #70
    On July 18th, 2010 at 11:19 am, Ragspierre said:

    If you are following much in the right blogosphere, you’ve seen several pieces in some of the “bigs” referring to the “F” word…fascist.

    It’s a point I’ve been making for a long time.

    The Obamic mode is not socialism. It is a lot more dangerous, because most Americans don’t even understand it, and because it seems less threatening.

  71. #71
    On July 18th, 2010 at 11:21 am, Dimsdale said:

    An ass kicking would be a “two fer”, inasmuch as his head is so far up his backside, it might knock some sense into him too.

    But Democrats are pretty resistant to that, aren’t they? Thick skulls I guess.

  72. #72
    On July 18th, 2010 at 12:43 pm, Bruce said:

    Have you noticed that the Obama regime is content to let us all whine about its injustice? See, they know that us talking about this stuff makes no difference. We need some leaders to step forward with the will and a plan to shut this mess down.

  73. #73
    On July 18th, 2010 at 1:02 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Off topic, but most people missed Sheila Jackson-Lee’s immigration rant to the NAACP…

    The National Disgrace Of Texas

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook