<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smearing J. Christian Adams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:00:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Race hustlers of a feather: Obama and the New Black Panther Party</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-1234442</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Race hustlers of a feather: Obama and the New Black Panther Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-1234442</guid>
		<description>[...] already got a preview when WaPo columnst E.J. Dionne attacked Adams last July. Read here.  Posted in: Eric Holder,New Black Panther Party,Politics  Printer Friendly   comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already got a preview when WaPo columnst E.J. Dionne attacked Adams last July. Read here.  Posted in: Eric Holder,New Black Panther Party,Politics  Printer Friendly   comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Link Dump &#171; Nice Deb</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-965234</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Link Dump &#171; Nice Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-965234</guid>
		<description>[...] so nastily partisan that they fail to do even the most basic of investigatory requirements before  sliming good, honest, decent Americans such as Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so nastily partisan that they fail to do even the most basic of investigatory requirements before  sliming good, honest, decent Americans such as Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cure for Political Dejection &#124; America Watches Obama</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-964708</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cure for Political Dejection &#124; America Watches Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-964708</guid>
		<description>[...] so nastily partisan that they fail to do even the most basic of investigatory requirements before  sliming good, honest, decent Americans such as Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so nastily partisan that they fail to do even the most basic of investigatory requirements before  sliming good, honest, decent Americans such as Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Spectator : The Cure for Political Dejection</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-964586</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Spectator : The Cure for Political Dejection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-964586</guid>
		<description>[...] so nastily partisan that they fail to do even the most basic of investigatory requirements before  sliming good, honest, decent Americans such as Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so nastily partisan that they fail to do even the most basic of investigatory requirements before  sliming good, honest, decent Americans such as Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin.musculus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-963881</link>
		<dc:creator>martin.musculus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-963881</guid>
		<description>Congress will &lt;em&gt;never&lt;/em&gt; investigate Cockroach&#039;s certification.

They would be found out as complicit in abrogation of their Oath Of Office...

Can&#039;t let &quot;our Idiot Constituents&quot; know about &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt;... 

Slapping the &quot;Clingers&quot; in the face with a wet fish might wake the rubes up and &lt;em&gt;worse&lt;/em&gt;, unite them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress will <em>never</em> investigate Cockroach&#8217;s certification.</p>
<p>They would be found out as complicit in abrogation of their Oath Of Office&#8230;</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t let &#8220;our Idiot Constituents&#8221; know about <em>that</em>&#8230; </p>
<p>Slapping the &#8220;Clingers&#8221; in the face with a wet fish might wake the rubes up and <em>worse</em>, unite them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-963690</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-963690</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What do you think the reaction from the Left will be when that gets proposed? They’ll head for the shadows like cockroaches.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;RAID!!!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What do you think the reaction from the Left will be when that gets proposed? They’ll head for the shadows like cockroaches.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>RAID!!!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flyoverman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-963682</link>
		<dc:creator>Flyoverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-963682</guid>
		<description>Happy, what I am saying is if Adams critics are whining about his testimony then they should have him charged with perjury or shut the BLEEP UP.

I have every confidence Admans was telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Sooooooo to those like EJ, the sniveling little water carrier, who say he&#039;s lying, I say fine; put all involved in the DOJ who Admans testified about under oath and also polygraph them.  I would demand Holder be included.

What do you think the reaction from the Left will be when that gets proposed?  They&#039;ll head for the shadows like cockroaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy, what I am saying is if Adams critics are whining about his testimony then they should have him charged with perjury or shut the BLEEP UP.</p>
<p>I have every confidence Admans was telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.</p>
<p>Sooooooo to those like EJ, the sniveling little water carrier, who say he&#8217;s lying, I say fine; put all involved in the DOJ who Admans testified about under oath and also polygraph them.  I would demand Holder be included.</p>
<p>What do you think the reaction from the Left will be when that gets proposed?  They&#8217;ll head for the shadows like cockroaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-963680</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-963680</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On July 27th, 2010 at 10:49 am, Flyoverman said: &lt;/blockquote&gt;Are you saying this guy is corrupt like the rest of them?  But he is going &lt;strong&gt;against&lt;/strong&gt; the corruption!  I know they are all corrupt.  But didn&#039;t this guy quit a very good job in order to blow the whistle on the rest?  So if the libs are calling him a liar, I am just asking....why would he lie?  He gave up his career and everything to do this.  I believe him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On July 27th, 2010 at 10:49 am, Flyoverman said: </p></blockquote>
<p>Are you saying this guy is corrupt like the rest of them?  But he is going <strong>against</strong> the corruption!  I know they are all corrupt.  But didn&#8217;t this guy quit a very good job in order to blow the whistle on the rest?  So if the libs are calling him a liar, I am just asking&#8230;.why would he lie?  He gave up his career and everything to do this.  I believe him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flyoverman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-963674</link>
		<dc:creator>Flyoverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-963674</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On July 27th, 2010 at 10:10 am, happyscrapper said: 

What reason would this man have to lie?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This one is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO easy.  Eveyone involved is in the DOJ from Adams right up to Eric.

I am not sure of Holder, but everyone underneath him, I believe MUST submit to a polygraph or resign.  Polygraph them all.  Supeona them all.  Put them all under oath.  Question them all.

If Adams lied under oath then where are the perjury charges?  That will happen as soon as Brietbart has to pay his $100,000 reward or Glenn Beck&#039;s red phone rings.

The Mafia has fewer criminals in it than the DOJ does right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On July 27th, 2010 at 10:10 am, happyscrapper said: </p>
<p>What reason would this man have to lie?</p></blockquote>
<p>This one is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO easy.  Eveyone involved is in the DOJ from Adams right up to Eric.</p>
<p>I am not sure of Holder, but everyone underneath him, I believe MUST submit to a polygraph or resign.  Polygraph them all.  Supeona them all.  Put them all under oath.  Question them all.</p>
<p>If Adams lied under oath then where are the perjury charges?  That will happen as soon as Brietbart has to pay his $100,000 reward or Glenn Beck&#8217;s red phone rings.</p>
<p>The Mafia has fewer criminals in it than the DOJ does right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-963651</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-963651</guid>
		<description>What reason would this man have to lie?  He had everything to lose and nothing to gain by making this up.  Get real, libs!  Your lies are sounding stupider and more desparate by the day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What reason would this man have to lie?  He had everything to lose and nothing to gain by making this up.  Get real, libs!  Your lies are sounding stupider and more desparate by the day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stillontheroad</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-963649</link>
		<dc:creator>stillontheroad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-963649</guid>
		<description>zyzzyg said: 
And the video clip you are referring to is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zyzzyg said:<br />
And the video clip you are referring to is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-963646</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-963646</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;…the worst thing Dionne does is smear the whistle-blowing attorney Christian Adams without ever talking with Adams and without checking the record.&lt;/em&gt;

Wouldn&#039;t we all (the public) be better served if an interview, or conversation, ocurred before a person was writen about, or shown in an brief video clip?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;…the worst thing Dionne does is smear the whistle-blowing attorney Christian Adams without ever talking with Adams and without checking the record.</em></p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t we all (the public) be better served if an interview, or conversation, ocurred before a person was writen about, or shown in an brief video clip?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITookTheRedPill</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-963537</link>
		<dc:creator>ITookTheRedPill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-963537</guid>
		<description>Smearing &lt;strike&gt;J. Christian Adams&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tea Partiers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/26/colorado-gop-candidate-these-tea-party-dumbasses-need-to-stop-asking-me-birther-questions-on-camera/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Colorado GOP candidate: These tea-party dumbasses need to stop asking me Birther questions on camera&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d say it&#039;s Buck who is the dumbass.

All he has to say is:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I support and defend the Constitution of the United States, and 
I support honesty, openness, and transparency.&lt;/blockquote&gt;  

No one can take issue with those two statements.

And by saying that, you not only take a stand for what&#039;s right but also apply indirect pressure on Obama, who:

&lt;blockquote&gt;committed to making his administration &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/change_has_come_to_whitehouse-gov/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the most open and transparent in history&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Obama is a liar.  And Buck is a dumbass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smearing <strike>J. Christian Adams</strike> <em><strong>Tea Partiers</strong></em>:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/26/colorado-gop-candidate-these-tea-party-dumbasses-need-to-stop-asking-me-birther-questions-on-camera/" rel="nofollow">Colorado GOP candidate: These tea-party dumbasses need to stop asking me Birther questions on camera</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s Buck who is the dumbass.</p>
<p>All he has to say is:</p>
<blockquote><p>I support and defend the Constitution of the United States, and<br />
I support honesty, openness, and transparency.</p></blockquote>
<p>No one can take issue with those two statements.</p>
<p>And by saying that, you not only take a stand for what&#8217;s right but also apply indirect pressure on Obama, who:</p>
<blockquote><p>committed to making his administration <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/change_has_come_to_whitehouse-gov/" rel="nofollow">the most open and transparent in history</a>&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Obama is a liar.  And Buck is a dumbass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITookTheRedPill</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-963492</link>
		<dc:creator>ITookTheRedPill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-963492</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;NBC&#039;s Chris Matthews Makes Freudian Slip: 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/07/26/nbcs_matthews_makes_freudian_slip_will_dems_run_away_from_president_ocarter.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Will Dems Run Away From &quot;President O&#039;Carter&quot;?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>NBC&#8217;s Chris Matthews Makes Freudian Slip:<br />
<a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/07/26/nbcs_matthews_makes_freudian_slip_will_dems_run_away_from_president_ocarter.html" rel="nofollow">Will Dems Run Away From &#8220;President O&#8217;Carter&#8221;?</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : More on Dionne</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2010/07/26/smearing-j-christian-adams/comment-page-1/#comment-963464</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : More on Dionne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=54624#comment-963464</guid>
		<description>[...] Berwiz had a similar take to  mine with regard to Dionne column. Good stuff. Michelle Malkin kindly  linked to me and added some thoughts. She hasn&#039;t gotten enough credit, by the way, for her longstanding coverage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Berwiz had a similar take to  mine with regard to Dionne column. Good stuff. Michelle Malkin kindly  linked to me and added some thoughts. She hasn&#039;t gotten enough credit, by the way, for her longstanding coverage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

