Video: “Welcome Obama Family: Thank you for choosing Marbella!”

By Michelle Malkin  •  August 5, 2010 08:40 AM

Doug Powers gave you the heads-up last month about the First Lady’s lavish Spanish adventure. She touched down yesterday with her youngest daughter, dozens of friends, and phalanx of government bodyguards in tow. The luxury resort of Marbella rejoiced — and our hapless State Department blanched — as she embarked on her first “walkabout” clad in a one-shoulder Jean Paul Gaultier top:

The Obama administration faced an embarrassing diplomatic blunder today after it was forced to pull a warning about racism in Spain – just as the First Lady arrived in the country for a summer holiday.

Soon after touching down in the Costa del Sol yesterday morning, Michelle Obama was pictured taking in the sights of Marbella with daughter Sasha, nine, surrounded by a throng of bodyguards.

Staff at the U.S. State Department removed the contentious advice to travellers, which included the phrase ‘racist prejudices could lead to the arrest of Afro-Americans who travel to Spain,’ from its website on Monday.

She is on a four-day visit and will be staying at the five-star Villa Padierna, rated as one of the world’s top 30 hotels, with 40 friends. The party has reserved 60 rooms.

…Flags welcoming the Obama family were waving in the breeze as Marbella – often associated with reality TV and gangsters – geared up for their arrival.

A large billboard reading: ‘Welcome Obama Family: Thank you for choosing Marbella!’ painted in red, white and blue hung in the city.

The Chicago Sun Times is keeping tabs on all of Mrs. Obama’s anti-recessionista travel:

Mrs. Obama’s U.S. Air Force jet landed at Malaga on Wednesday; she skipped celebrating her husband’s 49th birthday with him. (Daughter Malia, 12, is at overnight camp.) Mrs. Obama pays for personal expenses — as do her friends who arrived on their own — but that only covers a small part of the expense. Taxpayers pick up the tab for staff and security at the exclusive hotel and most of the expenses for the plane.

First ladies often go on vacations, with and without the president. An issue for Mrs. Obama may be how many: New York in March; Chicago, over Memorial Day; Los Angeles in June; Camp David — sort of an extension of the White House — in July; Maine in July, to highlight Acadia National Park, and now Spain. Mrs. Obama is glamorizing Spain’s coastal resorts before her Aug. 14 first family weekend visit to Florida’s Gulf Coast, to encourage tourists scared away by the oil spill. Starting Aug. 19, the Obamas will spend 10 days in Martha’s Vineyard.

Andrea Tantaros rightly dubs Mrs. O a “modern-day Marie Antoinette.”

Like Mrs. O’s old Chicago socialite pal Desiree Rogers liked to say before her profligate, negligent ways got her kicked out of the White House: Laissez les bon temps rouler.
***

Flashback: Cube-steak Americans vs. the Wagyu-beef White House

Cheers!

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Michelle Obama

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On August 5th, 2010 at 8:49 am, RobM1981 said:

    Tantaros’ article is excellent. A must-read, for sure.

    What I find fascinating to watch is the tone-deafness of this whole thing. The Obama’s clearly have no idea that their regal lifestyle is driving a huge wedge between them and most Americans.

    Most – but not all. There *are* liberals who believe that these are “just desserts” for winning. That Barack Obama and his family *deserve* the best, at all times, in all ways. About 20% of our population – 1 in 5 people – actually believe this.

    At the other extreme you have 40 or 50% that find this behaviour appalling, and in the middle are the remaining 20 or 30% are the luke-warms. (these are the folks whose votes decide the elections – even though they are only marginally plugged into reality).

    The danger here is the wedge between the extremes. The wedge between the minority who believe that Queen Michelle actually deserves this kind of vacation – at our expense – and those who are, as our hostess said “eating cube steak.”

    It’s tearing at the fabric of this country in ways we haven’t seen since the 1960′s.

    And those aren’t good memories.

  2. #2
    On August 5th, 2010 at 8:52 am, Truesoldier said:

    But the Obama’s are not that far removed from the average American…

    /sarc

  3. #3
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:06 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    How is this different from the “Running of the Bulls” ?

  4. #4
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:07 am, sbw999 said:

    They can spend their own money as they wish. But taxpayer money for security, airplanes etc.? This is politically tone deaf, and in keeping with all the pigs in our Congress who have a limitless credit card with our money. Flying a dog to Maine to vacation with them…at taxpayer dollars? Give me a break already.

    But I have no worry, because I expect that the media will be all over this to speak truth to power, to be the citizen’s watchdogs; pointing out the hypocrisy by the Obama’s who are asking us all to sacrifice; pointing out that George Bush didnt vacation in 8 years for a fraction of time the First Family has in less than 2 years. The NYT’s editorial board is probably already finished with the commentary for tomorrow’s editorial page on this. Nothing gets by the American free press, who will be exposing this…any…day……….now.

  5. #5
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:14 am, nail49 said:

    How is this their rationalization for this trip different from the “Running of Shooting the Bulls” ?

    Rogue: a few changes…

  6. #6
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:16 am, jsr said:

    None of this should matter. Normally, a president and his family should be entitled to vacations, even in tough times. But this is from a president who told us Americans setting their thermostat at 72 are wasteful and inconsiderate and his wife who told people that they shouldn’t pursue well paying careers (after leaving a $300,000 salary for a do-nothing job). They and their party constantly lecture Americans as wasteful, greedy, and in need of downsizing our lifestyles. So in this case if people are offended and make an issue of this, they and their “greener than thou” party have brought it on themselves. Quit lecturing Americans, most who can only dream of vacations like this, and we will not make an issue of your luxury lifestyle.

  7. #7
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:16 am, rambler said:

    The Obama vacation provided to them by the shared sacrifice of the American public. The Clintons had the white trash white house. The obamas are the social climbing, all for show, we’re not paying a cent for our world wind tour and party all the time white house. I’d call her Marie, but her taste in clothing isn’t that good.

  8. #8
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:28 am, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    Get used to it

    This is the way the new democrat overlords see the world

    We owe it to them, just ask them

    Besides shouldn’t we be learning newspeak instead of concerning ourselves with how Gigantor and her mother spend our money

  9. #9
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:37 am, flaming_o said:

    On August 5th, 2010 at 8:49 am, RobM1981 said:

    There *are* liberals who believe that these are “just desserts” for winning.

    Yes. For winning the political game. That’s for liberals. And not for producing, let’s say, a product people voluntarily choose to buy. That’s not for liberals. That’s greed.

  10. #10
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:40 am, Mojave Mark said:

    I say “live it up”. The more the zerO’s act like this the more even libtards can see them for who they are. We have been bamboozled America.

    I can see November from my porch.

  11. #11
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:53 am, prendad said:

    This is the way DICTATORS and their wives behave. Obama’s are just getting warmed up to the role.

  12. #12
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:54 am, txvet2 said:

    Well, at least they’re not causing traffic jams and disrupting other people’s lives in this country for awhile.

  13. #13
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:54 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    This is what we are paying taxes for?

    And don’t tell me the Obama’s paid for this. Un-friggin-believable.

    She’s needs a slap in the face.

  14. #14
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:59 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    jsr said:

    None of this should matter.

    I respectfully disagree. It does matter. If a president and the first family want a vacation, fine. But they, no matter which party they hail from, absolutely do not need an international jet set vacation to a foreign country on our dime.

    We’ll pay for security for the president and family regardless, but taking a a 6 figure, maybe 7 figure vacation to Spain is way out of line.

  15. #15
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:59 am, spaceycakes said:

    YAAGGHH! Too much teefus!

  16. #16
    On August 5th, 2010 at 10:00 am, Kevin from Ohio in Virginia said:

    Who is tending her vegetable garden during all of this time away???

  17. #17
    On August 5th, 2010 at 10:15 am, cheapseat said:

    Marie Antoinette indeed. These Obamas really do have contempt for America. The taxpayers and the goodness of the American people educated these (_*_) in ivy league schools, were decent enough to elect them as President and first lady, and these slugs abuse the priviledge at every turn. Parties at the White House, vacations every couple of weeks, arrugula and wagyo beef, all while the country is in a severe recession.

  18. #18
    On August 5th, 2010 at 10:20 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Given Michelle Obama’s past and current involvement with The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, I want to know with whom she is meeting behind closed doors and away from any cameras.

  19. #19
    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:07 am, tarpon said:

    The fruits of corruption are everywhere to see.

  20. #20
    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:25 am, Marc said:

    Rest assured that Katie Couric will not mention the Obamas Marie Antoinette sense of entitlement. The Obamas just think of themselves as better than everyone else except for their Hollywood friends. Say what you want about Bill Clinton. But Clinton would rather eat like a hog at Does Eats in Little Rock and slather that barbecue sauce all over the place than eat the fancy junk that the Obamas like. The trip to Spain does not bother me as much as the sickening trip to Hiroshima that the Obamas are planning. The Obamas are planning to apologize, on behalf of the United States to Japan for our bombing of Hiroshima. No president, not even Carter, ever disgraced himself this way. Just as Obama has made the Arabs the victims of Israeli “aggression”, the Obamas are now rewriting history to make Japan the victim of WW11. In the 2008 campaign, anybody who dared say that the Obamas viewed the USA as guilty as charged was branded a racist and McCarthyite. Now the true antiAmerican nature of the Obamas is out in the open.

  21. #21
    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:34 am, Romeo13 said:

    Is she staying in the Imelda Marcos sweet?

  22. #22
    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:39 am, RedDog said:

    Laissez les bon temps rouler.

    “Let the good times roll.”

  23. #23
    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:41 am, MarcoPolo said:

    What’s the carbon footprint on that motorcade?

  24. #24
    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:43 am, jlhudg23 said:

    Is that drink in the hand of the Vacationer-in-Chief a “screwdriver”?

  25. #25
    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:44 am, Lindsay said:

    Perhaps she is finally proud of this country.

    Reparations Tour VI.

  26. #26
    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:46 am, RedDog said:

    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:34 am, Romeo13 said:
    Is she staying in the Imelda Marcos sweet?

    Imelda Obama. Nice ring. I bet her shoe collection would give Imelda’s a run for the money. Remember the $600 tennies? Conspicuous consumption does not begin to describe the headlong hedonism of these people. Been the bottom rail too long I guess – at least they believe that to be the case.

  27. #27
    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:49 am, Regulus said:

    On August 5th, 2010 at 8:49 am, RobM1981 said:

    There *are* liberals who believe that these are “just desserts” for winning. That Barack Obama and his family *deserve* the best, at all times, in all ways. About 20% of our population – 1 in 5 people – actually believe this.

    I’d take it a step further: there are too many liberals in America who would feel perfectly comfortable living as subjects under a monarchy: replete with “royal families” (Kennedys, Clintons, Obamas), an aristocratic class that is above the laws that we serfs must obey (Kerry, Dodd, Rangel, Waters, Pelosi, Reid, Geithner, Daschle, et al), an all-powerful government bureaucracy the function of which is to preserve their power and privilege and a state-run media to preserve the illusion of worthy subjects happy under the enlightened benevolence of the nobility.

    Seriously. For example, I’m pretty sure that at least two, probably three or four of my sisters would see nothing wrong with “King Obama.”

    That’s why you don’t see them complaining about things like Chelsea Clinton’s “royal wedding” or the Black Marie Antoinette’s little soiree to the Spanish equivalent of Versailles. It’s why they don’t see anything unseemly about the Black Louis XVI hitting the links almost every weekend. It’s only natural to them that royal blood be accorded royal privileges.

    Just as long as it’s their royalty who are calling the shots, of course. They have absolute faith in the notion of being worthy subjects of a noble king, who will take cradle-to-grave care of them in exchange for them accepting everything and not questioning anything.

    These are the same people who won’t find anything wrong with it when one day the royal courts declare the Constitution to be “unconstitutional” look at the way they celebrate what just happened in California: the will of the people was just thwarted by an elitist homosexual judge and his elitist homosexual “expert witnesses,” and they’re celebrating.

  28. #28
    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:53 am, cicerokid said:

    Vacation from what? Working people get a vacation, don’t they?

  29. #29
    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:57 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    I wish the beauteous Michelle Obama had taken Comrade Obama (PBUH) with him on this great party trip. The more both of them are absent from the U.S.A.–the better for us peons.
    ***
    France is pretty close to Espana. And I thought I heard the sound of someone greasing up a political guillotine (aka election!) for use in removing our overlords and their ilk in the 2010 and 2012 elections.
    ***
    REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER–choose wisely. And support good conservative candidates financially now.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  30. #30
    On August 5th, 2010 at 12:08 pm, tre said:

    Well I, for one, don’t mind if they leave the USA.

    I just don’t like it when they come back.

  31. #31
    On August 5th, 2010 at 12:11 pm, mchristian said:

    What is it that Marie Antoinette said? Let them eat sh…cake?

  32. #32
    On August 5th, 2010 at 12:31 pm, 24Klady said:

    There is not a major vacation spot in the U.S., including AK and HI, that would not have benefitted by that many high profile people and their security forces visiting. Why Spain? We have a major crisis with our economy and they throw millions away getting to Spain. Something stinks and I’m hoping MM picks up on what/why/where it does?

  33. #33
    On August 5th, 2010 at 12:41 pm, palani said:

    Outside of the Obama entouraqe, I see a lot of white faces. This racist tea party thing must be going international.

  34. #34
    On August 5th, 2010 at 12:56 pm, battleaxe said:

    Even the UK papers are calling Lady O “a modern-day Marie Antoinette”. I think we need a new apology tour.

  35. #35
    On August 5th, 2010 at 1:11 pm, right_on said:

    Two simple questions need answering;

    1) How much of the yearly entertainment budget has Family Obama spent in the first 12 months of his rule, and YTD?

    2) Does unspent entertainment allowances (if any) get to be carried over year after year?

    Okay, perhaps one more question; Do the entertainment expenses get to be re-catoregized as “community outreach”, or diplomatic necessity, or some other creative label, in order to circumvent allowance limits?

    I don’t care to compare to other administration’s expenditures, since it wouldn’t be fair to the Obamas, and we know that no administration has partied more since the Family Clinton.

    We haven’t seen a recession this bad since the times of FDR, or so we keep getting reminded.

  36. #36
    On August 5th, 2010 at 1:15 pm, TigerLady said:

    It’s getting harder and harder for me to not hate these people. People are hurting across this nation with job loss, inability to pay their bills and feed their families. This wanna-be Marie Antoinette makes me want to puke.

  37. #37
    On August 5th, 2010 at 1:22 pm, rambler said:

    And to think that for the first time in her adult live she is proud of this country.

  38. #38
    On August 5th, 2010 at 1:41 pm, traveler49 said:

    On August 5th, 2010 at 11:49 am, Regulus said:

    Seriously. For example, I’m pretty sure that at least two, probably three or four of my sisters would see nothing wrong with “King Obama.”

    Include my brother in with that.

    I recently blew my stack at his strawman arguments to justify this Marxist regime at a family dinner.

    The obamas are family destroyers.

  39. #39
    On August 5th, 2010 at 1:43 pm, txvet2 said:

    On August 5th, 2010 at 12:31 pm, 24Klady said:

    Thadt’s the common wisdom, but I seriously doubt that any city actually benefits when these people are around tying up traffic, disrupting everybody else’s lives, and generally making a nuisance of themselves.

  40. #40
    On August 5th, 2010 at 1:46 pm, txvet2 said:

    On August 5th, 2010 at 1:41 pm, traveler49 said:

    Include my brother in with that.

    I recently blew my stack at his strawman arguments to justify this Marxist regime at a family dinner.

    Fortunately, my two brothers-in-law have finally seen the light. My last trip up north, they were both sounding like Rush Limbaugh listeners although they’d been yellow dog Democrats who voted for Obama.

  41. #41
    On August 5th, 2010 at 2:05 pm, mattm said:

    So, what it the carbon footprint of the planes and Suburban motorcade? NO wonder the left claims the rest of the world hates us, a dozen or so Subrubans tying up traffic for a leisure trip.

  42. #42
    On August 5th, 2010 at 2:48 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    jlhudg23 said:
    Is that drink in the hand of the Vacationer-in-Chief a “screwdriver”?

    It’s a Half-White Russian.

  43. #43
    On August 5th, 2010 at 2:50 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    she skipped celebrating her husband’s 49th birthday with him.

    Yeah, yeah, wasting millions of taxpayer dollars – the usual – but the whole family skipping his birthday is interesting. They all hate him? Did he ask them to leave him alone with…uh, well, anyway, it’s interesting.

  44. #44
    On August 5th, 2010 at 3:20 pm, infidel4life said:

    “modern-day Marie Antoinette” indeed. These posers see themselves as Royalty and us as their subjects. Well, Your Highnesses, you will learn that we won’t be ruled by stuffed-shirt pompous despots, just as George III did.

  45. #45
    On August 5th, 2010 at 5:14 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Aloha–LOL

    gosh, that’s a good one.

  46. #46
    On August 5th, 2010 at 8:24 pm, Dandapani said:

    I’m sorry, but to me BO looks like a COW.

  47. #47
    On August 5th, 2010 at 8:24 pm, Dandapani said:

    er, MO, rather

  48. #48
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:02 pm, stoptheinvasion said:

    LET THEM EAT CAKE, says the sickening socialist black Grinch masquerading as a first lady. lady is a term that should never be used with this racist fraud.

    but she sure loves rolling in our money, huh?

  49. #49
    On August 5th, 2010 at 9:41 pm, tonynoboloney said:

    In my Michigan county we have close to 20% unemployment. 36% of residents are receiving some kind of state/fed assistance. Tourism is down by 40%. Even k-Mart & Wal-Mart are having a hard time making a go. All school districts are struggling financially laying off staff due to dropping tax assessments. 3 out of 4 homes in our area for sale are due to foreclosure. Two of our senators just voted for Kagan.

    Sometimes I get so discouraged I could puke.

  50. #50
    On August 6th, 2010 at 4:31 am, jamesgreenidge said:

    It’s why they don’t see anything unseemly about the Black Louis XVI hitting the links almost every weekend.

    Needn’t make it sound racial like that. Using “Papa Doc” would do just fine.

  51. #51
    On August 6th, 2010 at 8:00 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On August 5th, 2010 at 2:48 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    jlhudg23 said:

    Is that drink in the hand of the Vacationer-in-Chief a “screwdriver”?

    It’s a Half-White Russian.

    Classic!

  52. #52
    On August 6th, 2010 at 8:54 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    It occurred to me that there is probably a bigger story, a deeper meaning, behind why this particular destination was selected.

    Given that the Ground Zero Mosque project is the “Cordoba project” (Cordoba being a city in Spain with distinct historical significance in Muslim conquest), I was wondering what significance Marbella has to Muslims…

    In Roman times, the city was called “Salduba” (Salt City[1]).

    During Islamic rule the Moors built a castle in this city.

    Castle, mosque, or both?

    The name Marbella, which is derived from Marbil-la, dates from this Islamic era

    In 1485 the city fell to Christian forces…

    In 1974 Prince Fahd arrived at the city… Until his death in 2005 he was a frequent and profitable guest at Marbella, where his retinue of over a thousand people spending petro-dollars was welcome, including the then-anonymous Osama bin Laden.

    Remember when Barack bowed to the Saudi King? Well, this was his predecessor…

    Marbella Remember[s] King Fahd.

    Fahd bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud. 1923 – August 1, 2005. He was the king and prime minister of Saudi Arabia and leader of the House of Saud.

    Everyone has a favourite Fahd story. Mine was that day he cast a glance eye over Marbella’s Hotel Don Pepe. He sent a secretary to enquire how much would the owners want for the hotel. The answerable was politely told the hotel was not for sale. The secretary replied: “Everyone has a price when in comes to the king”. But not that time. It was one of the very few occasions that Fahd was rejected. But his love affair with Marbella was not dimmed. He told a local journalist that he liked the town “because it is part of a land blessed by Allah”, referring to the time when the area had been occupied by the Arabs from the 8th to the 13th century.

    King Fahd’s Palace.

    From the hotel Incosol just outside Marbella, Fahd directed the construction of his Marbella property, Mar Mar Palace, modelled on the White House

    What significance do you think Muslims see in the Obama’s visit to Marbella?

    Remember this?

    Jihad: From Jakarta To The Whitehouse

  53. #53
    On August 6th, 2010 at 9:30 am, kurthanson said:

    We need to know exactly how much of our money was spent on this absurd junket. Is there no reporter out there who can get the numbers or does the white house claim this data as a state secret?

    Remember, the messiah slammed CEOS for going to Vegas, and then he sends Michele on Air Force 2 along with 40 bloodsucking sycophants on an all-expenses junket to Spain. This makes me sick!!!!

  54. #54
    On August 6th, 2010 at 9:34 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    She will take in the Alhambra fortress-palace, Spain’s most-visited tourist attraction…

    The Alhambra has incredible historical significance in the conflict between conquering Muslims and re-conquering “Reconquista” Christians.

    The Alhambra’s Moorish palaces were built for the last Muslim Emirs in Spain and its court, of the Nasrid dynasty. After the Reconquista by the Reyes Católicos (“Catholic Monarchs”) in 1492…

    1492 was also the year that the Catholic Monarchs of Spain financed Christopher Columbus’s journey to the new world.

    I believe Michelle Obama’s trip to Marbella is a significant and symbollic gesture, part of a current Muslim “Reconquista”…

  55. #55
    On August 6th, 2010 at 9:48 am, ITookTheRedPill said:
  56. #56
    On August 6th, 2010 at 10:46 am, Dimsdale said:

    Let them eat SPAM.

    She really does think she is a queen, or at least a cabinet appointee.

    They should be required to put out a budget for the trip, who went, and who paid for what. Imagine the carbon footprint for the 18 SUVs, the jets etc.!

  57. #57
    On August 6th, 2010 at 10:49 am, Dimsdale said:

    Wouldn’t it be more apropos if she were carried aloft in a chair supported on the shoulders of eight SS men?

    Got that whole Nefertiti thing goin’ on!

  58. #58
    On August 7th, 2010 at 1:09 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    To be fair, the United States government paid the tab for me going to Germany with my wife, two daughters, a dog, and a cat, for a total of eight and a half years, provided us with a place to live, and shipped my household goods and vehicles both ways both times, and I wasn’t even President! Of course, they did require that I work for it, defending Germany and the NATO alliance and all. The fact that I spent more time in the motor pool, field training exercises, gunnery training cycles, and other deployments than I spent with my family or sightseeing shouldn’t lessen the largesse of the government in providing all that. In fact, we went to Spain for Spring Break one year! Yep, we stayed at a hotel in Lloret de Mar for four whole days. Had to pay for the trip ourselves, ride both ways in a tour bus with a bunch of other people, all courtey of the ITT (International Tours & Travel) Office.

    Yeah, the Obamas can relate to ordinary Americans./sarc

    ECS

  59. #59
    On August 7th, 2010 at 1:10 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    …all courtesy of…

    ECS

  60. #60
    On September 25th, 2010 at 3:10 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

You must be logged in to post a comment.


How to Make a Liberal Politician Stand Up Against Intrusive Government

February 6, 2012 04:28 PM by Doug Powers

95 Comments

Mixed messages

Mr. and Mrs. Cranky Pants

January 27, 2012 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

138 Comments

Michelle Obama’s Unsavory School Lunch Flop

December 21, 2011 11:05 AM by Michelle Malkin

206 Comments

Michelle’s “Women for Obama” versus Obama’s women

November 14, 2011 11:38 PM by Michelle Malkin

54 Comments

First Lady Marks Down President

September 28, 2011 04:08 PM by Doug Powers

52 Comments

A fun fact about Michelle Obama’s chummy fries police

September 15, 2011 05:50 PM by Michelle Malkin

95 Comments


Categories: Michelle Obama

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook