Feds Sue Sheriff Arpaio, Investigate Chuck E. Cheese — Border Secure! Update: Arpaio Responds

By Doug Powers  •  September 2, 2010 03:24 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

By now you can probably read all about this in a revised report to the UN’s Human Rights Council that the Obama administration couldn’t wait to file like a nine year old girl tattling to momma after catching her brother behind the barn reading Playboy, but if you haven’t yet heard, here it is:

PHOENIX – The U.S. Justice Department sued Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Thursday, saying the Arizona lawman refused for more than a year to turn over records in an investigation into allegations his department discriminates against Hispanics.

The lawsuit calls Arpaio and his office’s defiance “unprecedented,” and said the federal government has been trying since March 2009 to get officials to comply with its probe of alleged discrimination, unconstitutional searches and seizures, and having English-only policies in his jails that discriminate against people with limited English skills.

If putting warning signs up in parts of Arizona to deter legal US citizens from travelling through certain areas where they might encounter dangerous illegal activity is an acceptable response to crime, can’t the government just put up signs warning illegals not to travel through Sheriff Arpaio’s jurisdiction and leave it at that?

In an additional border security measure, the Feds are also investigating the national security threat that is Chuck E. Cheese. Apparently the manager of the Bensonhurst franchise was overheard calling a pizza “Italian food” and has been accused of profiling.

At a Robert Gibbs’ press conference, reporter Bill Plante asked Gibbs why President Obama has been AWOL while Democrats poll numbers have been nosediving. The fact is, Obama hasn’t been AWOL during the nosedive at all — he’s been the one pushing forward hardest on the stick.

Update: Arpaio’s office responds — “Not backing down” is an understatement:

The Obama administration has filed three lawsuits against Arizona in the last few weeks … one against a college district, one against the state of Arizona and now one against my office. Each lawsuit centers on something to do with alleged racial discrimination.

These actions make it abundantly clear that Arizona, including this Sheriff, IS Washington’s new whipping boy. Now it’s time to take the gloves off. As for today’s lawsuit against my office: These people in Washington met with my attorneys only a few days ago. And in that meeting, Washington got our cooperation; they admitted they already have thousands of pages of the requested documents; and they were given access to interview my staff and get into my jails. They smiled in our faces and then stabbed us in the back with this lawsuit. The Obama administration intended to sue us all along, no matter what we did to try to avert it.

Washington isn’t playing fair and it’s time Americans everywhere wake up and see this administration for what it really is. Calculating, underhanded at times and certainly not looking out for the best interests of the legal citizens residing in this country.

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:32 pm, letget said:

    I just pray to God that we take the house and senate and hold hearings on this bho and team for what they are doing to our Republic. Sheriff Joe, please know millions of American’s love and respect what you are doing. I DO NOT love and respect this bho and team.
    L

  2. #2
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:33 pm, J.J. Sefton said:

    Hey, Bob Plante, leave him alone. Can’t you see he’s eating some shrimp?

  3. #3
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:37 pm, Truesoldier said:

    The U.S. Justice Department sued Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Thursday, saying the Arizona lawman refused for more than a year to turn over records in an investigation into allegations his department discriminates against Hispanics. stop arresting future democrat voters.

    That is what this is really about.

  4. #4
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:38 pm, tarpon said:

    I can’t wait before we can get rid of the czars and put this whole can of crap out in the sunlight.

  5. #5
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:39 pm, Truesoldier said:

    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:38 pm, tarpon said:
    I can’t wait before we can get rid of the czars and put this whole can of crap out in the sunlight.

    Somehow i have this feeling that they have taken Carol Browners advice and not put anything in writting.

  6. #6
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:43 pm, maisy said:

    It’s OFFICIAL!
    The US Government is a Criminal Enterprise.

  7. #7
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:43 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    the federal government has been trying since March 2009 to get officials to comply with its probe of alleged discrimination fishing expedition to find something, anything, with which to prosecute.

    Is Patrick Fitzgerald on the DoJ team?

  8. #8
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:45 pm, flmom said:

    The lawsuit calls Arpaio and his office’s defiance “unprecedented,” and said the federal government has been trying since March 2009 to get officials to comply with its probe of alleged discrimination,

    Classic case of the pot calling the kettle differently colored. The JD has still not co-operated with the probe of alleged discrimination regarding the Black Panther case. I wonder if that is “unprecedented”?

  9. #9
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:50 pm, Truesoldier said:

    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:45 pm, flmom said:
    The JD has still not co-operated with the probe of alleged discrimination regarding the Black Panther case. I wonder if that is “unprecedented”?

    Oh come on now, you know they have not had the time to turn over any documents or anything….they have been too busy doing real stuff like going after Sherriff Joe!

    /sarc

  10. #10
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:51 pm, walterc said:

    I wonder if Sheriff Joe can get out of this by joining the new black panthers.

  11. #11
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:53 pm, blues said:

    Shrimp and waffles,yum,yum.
    Of course Bambi is spearheading the Democraps’ nosedive,so he can throw the whole party under the bus,and run in 2012 as a “centrist”.Just like Clenis did.

  12. #12
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:56 pm, 24Klady said:

    Can’t we go after the powers that be under Rico laws? Something very wrong when citizens and whole states are feeling the boot – what’s next? The goosestep?

  13. #13
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 3:59 pm, thejim said:

    Sad, isn’t it? I am willing to bet that the Repubs replacing OBambi & Crew won’t bother invetigating any of the major thefts, treasonous, and downright criminal actions taking place right now. Trillions will have disappeared from the public coffers never to be questioned by either Party.

  14. #14
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:03 pm, Hangfire said:

    I hope the FEDS put Chuck E. Cheese out of business before we throw out the dems in November 2010 and 2012.

    Kill two stones with one bird, so to speak. I wouldn’t make GITMO detainees spend an hour at Chuck E. Cheeze; might get an Amnesty International investigation going for torture or inhumane treatment.

  15. #15
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:04 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    It’s OFFICIAL!
    The US Government is a Criminal Enterprise.

    Sadly, its been such since at least Jan. 20, 2009.

  16. #16
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:05 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Keep letting liberals run things and eventually, Chuck E. Cheese will be an adult-oriented, organic vegan dinner theater with nightly “Puppetry of the Penis” performances by solar-powered androids. Kids can’t be eating pizza, you soulless, uncaring wingnuts!

  17. #17
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:05 pm, Hangfire said:

    On board a Naval vessel, we called Italian food “WOP SLOP.”

    Mea Culpa Eternae

  18. #18
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:07 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Gabby Johnson: I wash born here, an I wash raished here, and dad gum it, I am gonna die here, an no sidewindin’ bushwackin’, hornswagglin’ cracker croaker is gonna rouin me bishen cutter.

  19. #19
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:13 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    I sure hope America can hold itself together until we vote these creeps out. They just pick away daily.

  20. #20
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:14 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Reverend Johnson: Now I don’t have to tell you good folks what’s been happening in our beloved little town. Sheriff murdered, crops burned, stores looted, people stampeded, and cattle raped. The time has come to act, and act fast. I’m leaving.

  21. #21
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:22 pm, sbw999 said:

    Do we need any more proof that this is a President and an administration at war with Americans???

  22. #22
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:24 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Hedley Lamarr: [to himself] A sheriff! But law and order is the last thing I want. Wait a minute… maybe I could turn this thing into my advantage. If I could find a sheriff who so offends the citizens of Rock Ridge that his very appearance would drive them out of town.
    [looks into the camera]
    Hedley Lamarr: But where would I find such a man?
    [pause]
    Hedley Lamarr: Why am I asking you?

  23. #23
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:34 pm, PhredE said:

    If putting warning signs up in parts of Arizona to deter legal US citizens from travelling through certain areas where they might encounter dangerous illegal activity is an acceptable response to crime, can’t the government just put up signs warning illegals not to travel through Sheriff Arpaio’s jurisdiction and leave it at that?

    Errr, uh, aren’t many of those signs the Federal Govt puts up out in the desert in English also?

  24. #24
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:36 pm, Papa Louie said:

    When the Obama Justice Department goes on a fishing expedition against Sheriff Joe Arpaio just because they don’t like him, they are guilty of the very profilling they accuse him of doing. It’s no different than pulling over and searching every car with a Republican bumper sticker in hopes of finding a minor violation, while speeders, drunk drivers, and car thiefs drive on by unmolested.

    If the next president did to Illinois what this president is doing to Arizona, Democrats would be screaming for her impeachment. Nevermind that Illinois really is corrupt. The Obama administration is doing everything in its power to protect the rights of non-citizens and terrorists while, at the same time, doing everything it can to trample the rights of law-abiding citizens and anyone who would dare to enforce our laws.

  25. #25
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:40 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Okay, so the feds send 30 new border guards (to post new signs I imagine) while sending a thousand lawyers to Phoenix to “get Joe”.

    I’m sure McCain is all over it already.

  26. #26
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:51 pm, vickisoup said:

    “Unprecedented”?? There’s that silly word again. Oh, and for “precedence”, the DOJ need look no further than the mirror in their own hallway.
    Like, for instance, the records of which terrorists Holder and his firm represented before his ascension to his current position.
    Sheisters.
    8)

  27. #27
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:55 pm, GJCorby said:

    Barrack the Anti-Christ” Obama supports law breakers and persecutes those who try to enforce the law.

  28. #28
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:59 pm, TigerLady said:

    Sheriff Joe is a strong man and I suspect he will not fold so easily. And the worst part of this nightmare in going after him is the people are on his side. Go Joe!

  29. #29
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 5:03 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    I’m not an expert on the laws governing this situation but Arpaio’s attorney’s are arguing that they have made all files relevant to the DOJ’s investigation but that the DOJ has not made clear exactly what they are investigating. I take this to mean that there are no specific allegations of wrong doing related to named persons.

    The DOJ is just demanding that ALL files be turned over? This is just a fishing expedition. Is that legal?

  30. #30
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 5:13 pm, Roland said:

    When I first saw this, I thought it was just a bad joke.

    Back in 1998 I was opposed to the impeachment of WJC because I thought perjury in a sex case didn’t rise to the level the Founders intended when they wrote “High Crimes an Misdemeanors.”

    I don’t care any more. Go for the jugular. All the time. Every time. It doesn’t matter what the Founders meant in those kinds of cases. The Founders would have had every single stinking modern Democrat politician shot for Treason.

    Democrats aid and abet a hostile invasion, using the power of the federal government to legally harrass and attack Americans who resist. Democrats want to let the Muslims build a Mosque on the remains where other Muslims mass murdered thousands of Americans in the name of Islam.

    Any American citizen who votes for any Democrat ever again is a traitor to his country.

    Democrats are evil.

  31. #31
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 5:16 pm, spaceycakes said:

    he’s been the one pushing forward hardest on the stick.

    Did he visit Man Country again?

    Oh, you mean the thing…

  32. #32
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 5:19 pm, tre said:

    The lawsuit calls Arpaio and his office’s defiance “unprecedented,”

    Having a President and a Cabinet who hates the USA this much is, too.

  33. #33
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 5:21 pm, spaceycakes said:

    25-year tenure with the DEA, [Arpaio]was stationed in Argentina, Turkey and Mexico, and advanced through the ranks to the position of head of the DEA’s Arizona branch.

    one would think they’d be a bit more respectful of someone who knows the ropes.

  34. #34
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 5:36 pm, 24Klady said:

    Requests to turn over all the files is nothing more than – then we can decide what charges to file, surely something in there is inflamatory. I’m surprised he hasn’t been audited by the IRS.

  35. #35
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 5:40 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Delay this thing until January. By then God willing the supeonas will be flying out of Issa’s office at a rate to 3 per minute. The One, Holder, Browner, etc. will be so busy covering their keesters Sheriff Joe will cease being a priority to them.

    Vote GOP! Primaries are over. Time to take out the Klingons. We’ll clean up elephantland down the road.

  36. #36
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 5:44 pm, prendad said:

    I guess this is the “creepy government thing of the day” from the Obama regime. Thank you prez Obama and airhead Holder. Now I guess I know exactly what the Reverend Mother Gaius Helen Mohiam was supposed to feel in the movie DUNE when she screamed “GET OUT OF MY MIND”.
    It has been quite interesting to watch a President of the United States who actually knows next to nothing about how Americans react to things. The more you keep screwing with Arizona, Mr. President, the more the state’s citizens will escalate their rebellion to your interference. It’s a no-win situation dummy. Back-off.

  37. #37
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 5:49 pm, spaceycakes said:

    prendad–we need to start building weirding modules.

  38. #38
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 6:26 pm, swede said:

    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:51 pm, vickisoup said:
    “Unprecedented”?? There’s that silly word again. Oh, and for “precedence”, the DOJ need look no further than the mirror in their own hallway.

    “The actions of the sheriff’s office are unprecedented,” Thomas Perez, assistant attorney general for the department’s civil rights division, told The Associated Press.

    Lets talk “unprecented”:
    >The federal government “suing” state and municipal governments and officials in the sovereign execution of their sworn duties.
    > The DOJ commandeering terrorism cases that have already been fairly, effectively and properly adjudicated in military courts.
    > The DOJ electing not to procede with prosecuting the murderer of 17 US sailors.
    > The DOJ investigating and impeding the CIA and FBI in their efforts to gain intelligence on our domestic enemies.

    Americans are increasingly recognizing our primary enemy. Our own government. Seems hope n’ change means government of the elite, by the elite and for the elite.

    Keep the change.

  39. #39
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 6:33 pm, sdillard said:

    A thought experiment: Joe Arpaio says “bite me” to the feds.

    The feds do…what, exactly? Take away federal funds? Fine.

    What then? Send in the Army?

    What would actually happen if a county, such as Maricopa, or a STATE, such as Arizone, told the feds to f**k off and pound sand?

  40. #40
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 6:36 pm, prendad said:

    On September 2nd, 2010 at 5:49 pm, spaceycakes said:
    prendad–we need to start building weirding modules.

    Wow, no kidding. The Baron Vladimir Obama must not get all the spice.

  41. #41
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 6:52 pm, prendad said:

    On September 2nd, 2010 at 6:33 pm, sdillard said:
    A thought experiment: Joe Arpaio says “bite me” to the feds.

    Very interesting. Obama says: “No more Federal Funds”.
    Arizona says: “Fine, no more tax money”.
    Obama says: “I’m sending in troops”.
    Arizona says: “Our National Guard and our Hopi, Navajo, and Apache Indians will be waiting for them”.
    Obama says “Waaaaaahhhhhhh”.

  42. #42
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 6:57 pm, sdillard said:

    Yes! Seriously, what happens when a soverign state says. “No”?

    Arizona gov orders Ariz National Guard to border. Feds say No. Arizona gov orders state cops and sheriffs to follow SB 1070…feds say No.

    State ignores feds and does what it wants.

    What, exactly, can the feds DO about it

    I think we may be getting to the point where one state, or more, tell the feds to stuff it and what, exactly, are the feds going to do then?

  43. #43
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 7:14 pm, Ragspierre said:

    The lawsuit calls Arpaio and his office’s defiance “unprecedented,”

    To swede’s excellent examples, I’d add the VARIOUS Congressional requests for DOJ files and testimony that are NOW…TODAY…being stonewalled.

  44. #44
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 7:41 pm, elgringoviejo said:

    If this is a battle of intelligence between Mr. Holder and Mr. Joe, I believe that Mr. Holder is unarmed.

  45. #45
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 7:51 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    Nullification. Nullification. Nullification.

    Restraints on marketing to children is a violation of Free Speech.

    Too bad Corporate America won’t show the stones that Joe has.

  46. #46
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 8:45 pm, stillontheroad said:

    Our Earth Tone President swathed in Beige – so very Brave. Our Fearless Leader with Stedman as point shlock is making a mockery or Arizonas law enforcement agencies as well as a mockery of our entire country. I would rather take a belt sander to my head than have to listen to jug head lisp another word.

  47. #47
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 9:04 pm, WaterBoyz said:

    English only in jail?
    Those Home Land warning signs in AZ are in English.
    Hummmmm…..

  48. #48
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 10:16 pm, BruceB said:

    I’ve always said ” You can’t be a Christian and a Democrat too!”

  49. #49
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 10:32 pm, BuckeyeSam said:

    Didn’t Obama once say “nobody messes with Sheriff Joe”?

    He should take his own advice because Joe Arpaio doesn’t strike me as moronic and weak-kneed as milquetoast Joe Biden.

  50. #50
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 10:36 pm, Living in the PSRK said:

    Washington isn’t playing fair and it’s time Americans everywhere wake up and see this administration for what it really is. Calculating, underhanded at times and certainly not looking out for the best interests of the legal citizens residing in this country.

    Gosh, this man needs more microphones in his face that are turned ON.

    I’ve always said ” You can’t be a Christian and a Democrat too!”

    You can’t be a decent, intelligent human being and be a Democrat.

  51. #51
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 10:41 pm, happy2behere said:

    It’s not official until Hollyweird makes a movie about the brave Justice Department Lawyers who stood up to Mean Ol’ Joe. Cue the stereotypes! Begin the labeling! Cash in on the cliche’s!

  52. #52
    On September 2nd, 2010 at 11:44 pm, love2rumba said:

    Vote GOP! Primaries are over. Time to take out the Klingons. We’ll clean up elephantland down the road.

    ..don’t forget the Romulans!

  53. #53
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:00 am, rightwingrocker said:

    The feds suing Arpaio is proof positive of their level of willingness to secure the border.

    FETE

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  54. #54
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:01 am, rightwingrocker said:

    I just pray to God that we take the house and senate and hold hearings on this bho and team for what they are doing to our Republic.

    Yeah you may see hearings.

    You can bet it will be a dog-and-pony show though, not unlike the one you saw with the last Donk to walk into the Oval Office.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  55. #55
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:04 am, rightwingrocker said:

    It’s OFFICIAL!
    The US Government is a Criminal Enterprise.

    Has been for a lot longer than anyone has been willing to acknowledge.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  56. #56
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:11 am, rightwingrocker said:

    I sure hope America can hold itself together until we vote these creeps out. They just pick away daily.

    Problem with that is that you’re going to vote them out and replace them with other creeps – the kind that sing your song while playing the enemy’s game.

    Neither is good, but at least with an admitted lib, you know what you’re getting from the getgo.

    Not necessarily so with an R. Have you forgotten eight years of GWB already?

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  57. #57
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:12 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Do we need any more proof that this is a President and an administration at war with Americans???

    It’s an entire ruling class at war with Americans.

    For proof, vote Republican and see what you get.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  58. #58
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:14 am, rightwingrocker said:

    On September 2nd, 2010 at 4:36 pm, Papa Louie said:

    Thank you.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  59. #59
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:15 am, rightwingrocker said:

    I’m sure McCain is all over it already.

    Over it?

    Phil, that man is a willing accomplice.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  60. #60
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:19 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Back in 1998 I was opposed to the impeachment of WJC because I thought perjury in a sex case didn’t rise to the level the Founders intended when they wrote “High Crimes an Misdemeanors.”

    Perjury in ANY case is a high crime. It is a felony under federal law.

    Sex is great. Lying about it under oath is a ticket to a prison term.

    Why is William Blythe still roaming free?

    I think we all know the answer. The question remains: Who has the courage to speak out about it?

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  61. #61
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:22 am, rightwingrocker said:

    I don’t care any more. Go for the jugular. All the time. Every time. It doesn’t matter what the Founders meant in those kinds of cases. The Founders would have had every single stinking modern Democrat politician shot for Treason.

    It DOES matter what the Founders meant.

    They would also have had every single stinking Republican politician shot for treason.

    Once Americans start thinking along those lines, hope for the survival of the Republic will be restored.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  62. #62
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:22 am, rightwingrocker said:

    (modern) – of course.

  63. #63
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:23 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Democrats are evil.

    GOVERNMENT is evil.

    FIFY

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  64. #64
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:25 am, Ragspierre said:

    They smiled in our faces and then stabbed us in the back with this lawsuit. The Obama administration intended to sue us all along, no matter what we did to try to avert it.

    That is VERY likely.

  65. #65
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:03 am, Republicanvet said:

    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:19 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Back in 1998 I was opposed to the impeachment of WJC because I thought perjury in a sex case didn’t rise to the level the Founders intended when they wrote “High Crimes an Misdemeanors.”

    Perjury in ANY case is a high crime. It is a felony under federal law.

    Sex is great. Lying about it under oath is a ticket to a prison term.

    Why is William Blythe still roaming free?

    I think we all know the answer. The question remains: Who has the courage to speak out about it?

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

    Anyone who believes Clenis only deserved impeachment because of perjury should read David Shippers book, Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton’s Impeachment.

    You would also learn how absolutely disgusting the Senate Republicans were during that time when they rolled over and refused to do their duty.

  66. #66
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:21 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Having a President and a Cabinet who hates the USA this much is, too.

    Very true.

    Still, knowing that and that he’s open and honest about that fact works to our advantage.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  67. #67
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:23 am, rightwingrocker said:

    one would think they’d be a bit more respectful of someone who knows the ropes.

    In their minds, they ARE the ropes.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  68. #68
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:25 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Requests to turn over all the files is nothing more than – then we can decide what charges to file, surely something in there is inflamatory.

    This is exactly the same concept used all over America today where someone is arrested without any respect for what charges might be filed.

    Start requiring arresting officers to name the charges at the time of arrest, and this stuff will actually be surprising.

    The way things are now, it’s not.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  69. #69
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:27 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Vote GOP!

    Yeah vote GOP and get the same thing the Donks are giving you.

    You aren’t going to beat the Donks by electing their Republican buddies.

    Sad and hard truth, but truth nonetheless.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  70. #70
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:29 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Also don’t forget that the 2008 GOP candidate was on the same side as Obama on this issue….

    Never forget.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  71. #71
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:30 am, drfredc said:

    So, let me get this straight. The Obamacrats are suing because the Obamacrats have secretly decided, via super secret executive orders, not to enforce the federal law, and somehow that secret didn’t get to some beleaguered sheriff in AZ, who is attempting to enforce the state and federal laws?

    Wow, seems like it’s time to order up another case of supreme popcorn because that’s where this is going.

  72. #72
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:31 am, rightwingrocker said:

    A thought experiment: Joe Arpaio says “bite me” to the feds.

    More Americans need to do this.

    Until it happens, “the feds” will keep intruding upon Americans’ freedoms and, as in this case, sovereignty.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  73. #73
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:33 am, rightwingrocker said:

    What, exactly, can the feds DO about it(?)

    Legally? Nothing.

    Of course, that means nothing whatsoever when it comes to the US government.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  74. #74
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:35 am, rightwingrocker said:

    He should take his own advice because Joe Arpaio doesn’t strike me as moronic and weak-kneed as milquetoast Joe Biden.

    Arpaio has a job that involves more than being a simple kiss-a$$.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  75. #75
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:39 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Anyone who believes Clenis only deserved impeachment because of perjury…

    My point was that perjury was more than enough.

    Whatever else they had on him SHOULD have been merely academic. One conviction is all it takes. Convict on the least of the charges if you will, but since you have more than ample proof, convict.

    Just more proof that Republicans are just stealth Democrats.

    Indeed.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  76. #76
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:40 am, rightwingrocker said:

    You would also learn how absolutely disgusting the Senate Republicans were during that time when they rolled over and refused to do their duty.

    They refused to do their duty because they were on the same side all along.

    Wake up everybody … no more sleepin’ in bed …

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  77. #77
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 1:45 am, rightwingrocker said:

    Wow, seems like it’s time to order up another case of supreme popcorn because that’s where this is going.

    Iwould agree if this were news.

    It’s not.

    Nor is it in any way surprising or entertaining. It’s just more of the same.

    As right as he is, Arpaio is NOT going to win – and neither is America for the time being.

    For the real objective to be achieved (that is, America winning), Americans will need to look very closely at both parties and come to a conclusion as to each/both’s fitness to enforce the Constitution, and take the lead in doing so when both parties fail to meet any reasonable standard.

    It’s up to US, people, not Sheriff Arpaio or Barack Obama. Joe is one of us, but allowing people who are not to hold office is unacceptable.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  78. #78
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 7:52 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    HAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHHHHAAAAAAAA

    Go Joe! :)

  79. #79
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 9:23 am, happy2behere said:

    They refused to do their duty because the were “doing” the same kinda thing.

  80. #80
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 9:28 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    The Justice Department is abusing it’s power and causing harm to US citizens. They need to be removed from their posts. Forcibly if need be. The question is, what authority would do this?

    Seriously. The Obama administration had ignored the law. Blatantly lied and manipulated facts to get Obamacare passed. Concealed facts Americans are entitled to know.

    What’s to prevent them from taking this further?

    They are usurping the rights of American citizens and frankly, I believe they will take it as far as the want because apparently, there’s only thing that they believe can stop them. Elections.

    If they manage to corrupt elections further, we have a bigger problem than previously thought.

  81. #81
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 9:31 am, sbw999 said:

    Here is to the most politically tone deaf administration ever. May they keep burying themselves.

  82. #82
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 9:44 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    Roland said:

    When I first saw this, I thought it was just a bad joke.

    Back in 1998 I was opposed to the impeachment of WJC because I thought perjury in a sex case didn’t rise to the level the Founders intended when they wrote “High Crimes an Misdemeanors.”

    I don’t care any more. Go for the jugular. All the time. Every time. It doesn’t matter what the Founders meant in those kinds of cases. The Founders would have had every single stinking modern Democrat politician shot for Treason.

    Democrats aid and abet a hostile invasion, using the power of the federal government to legally harrass and attack Americans who resist. Democrats want to let the Muslims build a Mosque on the remains where other Muslims mass murdered thousands of Americans in the name of Islam.

    Any American citizen who votes for any Democrat ever again is a traitor to his country.

    Democrats are evil.

    Yeah. What Roland said.

    What Obama is engaged in is another form of asymmetrical warfare. But a key element of that warfare is to disguise the act so that are not seen by most as attacks or an invasion. Put a smiling face on the tip of the spear.

    “Relax folks. We’re here to help.”

    Obama’s enemy is what America has been for the past 200 plus years. His goal and the goal of his ilk is to destroy that. Their method is to take it down in small pieces. And in the process, take away the tools that would be used to defend against the attacks.

    Sounds melodramatic, but it’s what going on. He wants to do a lot more than spread the wealth around.

  83. #83
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 9:46 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    rightwingrocker said:

    Also don’t forget that the 2008 GOP candidate was on the same side as Obama on this issue….

    Never forget
    .

    Absolutely.

    And the reality is… he is still on the same side. He just won’t say so at the moment.

  84. #84
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 9:46 am, prendad said:

    Oh booooo hooooooo. Another lawsuit from the Obama administration. This is so familiar to me, I’ve seen it all before. Let’s see now, it was a friday, early Fall I think, when Joey got mad and yelled because we wouldn’t play fair so he took his football home.

  85. #85
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 9:47 am, Rorschach said:

    I think if I were Sheriff Joe my response would have been two unprintable syllables with the last word being “YOU”, followed by a phrase along the lines of “if you want my files, you had better bring a heavy armor battalion along with you to collect em.” followed by a single finger gesture made famous by Harry Reid…

  86. #86
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 10:22 am, Roland said:

    Sounds melodramatic, but it’s what going on. He wants to do a lot more than spread the wealth around.

    Yep. Most Americans thought he was talking about doing some minor ‘wealth spreading’ in America. They did not understand this guy is an internationalist ‘citizen of the world,’ not an American, no matter what his birth certificate says.

    His plan is to spread our wealth globally, bringing us down to the global average.

  87. #87
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 10:30 am, NHMagenta said:

    @44, I doubt Obama would “punt” in that sort of situation, I.E. if Arizona were to prevent Federal taxes from reaching the US Treasury but instead get Congress to declare insurrection…and I don’t wish to speculate on how that would turn out except to say there be no victor.

    If the GOP is in control of Congress … then I would expect him to pull out something from the PATRIOT acts to enable him to unilaterally send in troops or at least blockade Arizona to starve it into submission.

  88. #88
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 10:48 am, kilroyshere said:

    DOJ and ICE officials in particular, have defiantly not enforced the laws they swore to uphold.

    It’s long overdue that these and other officials, who’ve been furthering their own political agendas, be held accountable for not following the laws of our land they were hired, appointed and paid to do so.

    After November; it’s amongst my greatest hopes that a vigorous legal drive is undertaken, to bring civil and if possible, criminal charges against those who have:

    1. Failed to prosecute Voter Intimidation (the Black Panther case)
    2. Failed to prosecute those who wish for and have attempted to destroy America (the 911 & USS COLE perps)
    3. Failed to keep our borders secure and, prosecute, arrest and/or deport illegal aliens when found.

    America is crumbling under this misguided Obama regime.

    ___‹^›__‹(•¿•)›__‹^›___

  89. #89
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 10:56 am, pokenhorn said:

    Why hasn’t the Obuma administration been charged with treason? They willfully fail to protect the sovereignty of our nation. They preen and strut as though they are beyond reach of the laws that apply to all of the rest of us. Why should any federal law be respected if they only are enforced at the whim of the politicians in power? Describing our problem as one of ‘illegal immigration’ misses the point. It is a problem of INVASION. The enemy is here. Mexico is the enemy. Mexicans are the enemy. Americans who applaud this invasion are the enemy. We have taught the world that we are a weak, trembling nation that will go to any lengths to avoid hurting someone’s feelings. We must correct that false message.

  90. #90
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 10:57 am, Mister P said:

    It is times like these that I wish Goldwater was still around. He would whack Obama on the side of the head.

  91. #91
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 10:57 am, Dimsdale said:

    Prosecute the legal citizens and let the illegal alien invaders loose.

    Makes perfect sense in the Øbamanation.

  92. #92
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 11:08 am, kilroyshere said:

    I pray it doesn’t happen.

    But until a terrorist attacks America who is found having entered the U.S. through our poorly secured and ignored borders that the Government refuses to properly control…

    …will America wake up and demand our officials secure our borders in the manner in which we’ve been working hard to sucure on the Iran/Iraq, Afghani/Paki and N/S Korean borders.

    What our government is failing to do protecting and defending America is criminal.

    ___‹^›__‹(•¿•)›__‹^›___

  93. #93
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 11:35 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Sherrif Joe as Cy Tolliver: Sayin’ questions in that tone and pointin’ your finger at me will get you told to **** yourself.

  94. #94
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 11:43 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    I’ll take a $10 bet on Sheriff Joe to win. But I will probably have to wait until after the November 2012 election to see it.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  95. #95
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 11:54 am, cheapseat said:

    One lawman enforcing our laws, and this administration’s DOJ sues him. Eric Holder needs to be investigated by the new congress every day from Jan 20, 2011 to Jan 20, 2013, just to keep him busy until we can get rid of this racist idiot. If you’re a minority to this idiot, you get a pass to break any laws you wish, and if you get caught, we’ll intimidate and harrass the police until they let you go. WHAT A COUNTRY!

  96. #96
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:05 pm, traveler49 said:

    Sheriff Arpaio

    You’re our man.

    If you can’t do it,

    No one can!

    Sis boom bah! sis boom bah!

  97. #97
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:05 pm, T-Bone said:

    Obama is a really stupid man. He puts on a good front but his brain is really lacking. Sheriff Joe is very popular across the country. Obama is in for some real trouble now but that doesn’t keep him from provoking everyone in sight while his 2nd face tells everyone how great things are and what a great job he is doing.

    The facts speak for themselves. You go Joe, don’t let big government try to bulldoze you over. If only Obama put this much effort into enforcing our laws, which is the executive branchs mandate, not undermining them.

    Bizarro world indeed.

  98. #98
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:40 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    Is Patrick Fitzgerald on the DoJ team?

    No, he’s still in Illinois studiously not investigating Chicago’s city and C[r]ook county’s governments for corruption.

    ECS

  99. #99
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:49 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Go Sheriff Joe!

  100. #100
    On September 3rd, 2010 at 12:56 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    On September 2nd, 2010 at 5:40 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Time to take out the Klingons.]

    I think you do Klingons a disservice.

    Klingons have little use for politicians (petaQ). The Romulans are more like politicians in that they have no honor, are backstabbing petaQ, and jump on the bandwagon when it suits their purposes.

    Qap law’!

    ECS

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Obama’s latest campaign angle: I’ve been saving America from wild Republican debts

May 24, 2012 04:33 PM by Doug Powers

48 Comments

Skinny-mirror accounting

Biden: Tea Party stopped us from growing the economy

May 23, 2012 01:55 PM by Doug Powers

44 Comments

“Imagine where we’d be…”

Jimmy Fallon: Obama ‘booked himself’ on my show

May 22, 2012 01:43 PM by Doug Powers

47 Comments

Invitation to offer invitation graciously accepted

Pose of the day

May 21, 2012 12:44 PM by Doug Powers

113 Comments

Hail Mary

Biden: Hey, I don’t blame people for voting for a convicted felon instead of my boss

May 18, 2012 01:21 PM by Doug Powers

73 Comments

Gift that keeps on giving

Senate narrowly votes down Obama budget

May 16, 2012 06:09 PM by Doug Powers

47 Comments

Transparency update: Donors told to hand over cell phones upon entering Obama fundraisers

May 15, 2012 04:40 PM by Doug Powers

42 Comments

Confidentiality we can believe in


Categories: Barack Obama,Eric Holder,Immigration,Racial profiling

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook