Associated Press Orders No Pictures Shown of Burned Korans; Burned Christian Bibles, Not So Much; Update: Koran Burn Canceled

By Doug Powers  •  September 9, 2010 04:17 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

Hot off the press from the AP’s Department of Double Standards we find this:

09/09/2010

AP Press Release

Memo to AP staff from Standards Center: Guidance – planned Sept. 11 Quran burning

Colleagues,

As you know, a group known as the Dove World Outreach Center in Gainesville, Fla., has announced that it intends to burn copies of the Quran on Sept. 11.
[...]
The concept of this planned event is offensive to many Muslims worldwide. National leaders and spokesmen for other religious denominations have also found the plan repugnant.

Should the event happen on Saturday, the AP will not distribute images or audio that specifically show Qurans being burned, and will not provide detailed text descriptions of the burning. With the exception of these specific images and descriptions, we expect to cover the Gainesville event, in all media, placing the actions of this group of about 50 people in a clear and balanced context.

Last year, the AP didn’t appear to think twice before showing pictures of burned Christian bibles:

null

Update: Koran burn called off, AP photo editors’ weekend just got less stressful:

GAINESVILLE, Fla. – The anti-Muslim leader of a tiny Florida church backed off his threat to burn the Quran, defusing an international firestorm Thursday after he said he was promised that a planned Islamic center and mosque would be moved away from New York’s ground zero. The imam planning the center, however, quickly denied such a deal.

Throughout this whole flap, did you feel like the lunch meat of sanity unwillingly trapped between two slices of kookbread in a wacko sandwich? “An exercise in over-reaction” doesn’t begin to sum it up.

(h/t WZ)

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:19 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    In other words news is happening…

    AP: (covering eyes and ears) “lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalal”

  2. #2
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:21 pm, verogolfer said:

    That’s because Christians don’t slit the throats of people who offend them.

  3. #3
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:21 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Muslims hanging the brutalizd bodies of dead Americans from bridges…

    AP: If it bleeds it leads!

  4. #4
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:22 pm, rambler said:

    The AP which has doctored photos doesn’t want to photograph the crispy koran. Go figure.

  5. #5
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:22 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    we expect to cover the Gainesville event, in all media, placing the actions of this group of about 50 people in a clear and balanced context.

    (spew!) Bwahahahahahahahahaha!

  6. #6
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:23 pm, d1carter said:

    Don’t want to get anyone…ya know….beheaded.

  7. #7
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:24 pm, mchristian said:

    Liberals call conservatives fear mongers. They are pee their pants scared of Muslims. No mongering necessary.

  8. #8
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:27 pm, kudafa said:

    It’s interesting to see how one person, in a dinky Florida backwater, has caused so much commotion. Let him burn the koran, & be done with it. So what if “hundreds of Afghani’s..” are rioting. What else do they have on their “to do list” for today? I’ve pretty much had it with burning the Flag, murdering Westerners, uttering threats & demanding sharia law. SCREW THEM.

  9. #9
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:27 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    Interesting. They were, however, willing to show and tell us all about the koran being flushed down a toilet.

    And liberals all over this country burn the U.S. flag because that’s free speech. I’m not sure how a physical act became speech, but liberals love to burn things. Except the koran, which they hold in high reverence.

    Go here and read the comments under the cartoon. That pretty much explains it.

  10. #10
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:27 pm, spaceycakes said:

    the AP is a bunch of scaredy-cat(fish)

  11. #11
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:29 pm, spaceycakes said:

    liberals love to burn things

    TooMuchTime…reminds me of little Ralphie Wiggum of Simpson’s fame:

    ‘…and that’s where I see the leprechaun–he tells me to burn things!’

  12. #12
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:31 pm, spaceycakes said:

    liberals love to burn things

    yee-AH! they be blazin’ that sh!t!

  13. #13
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:37 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    …he tells me to burn things!

    Liberal Fascists have been burning books for quite some time now. People, too. It gets their activist juices flowing.

    In this instance, it’s a church pastor that is doing this, not so much to destroy every last copy of the book (as a liberal fascist would do), but more as a publicity stunt.

    Ever see the movie Fahrenheit 451? Don’t forget that the gov’t in that movie was a socialist dictatorship. The schools were all run by the gov’t. And the serfs were taught that burning books was good for them.

    Ain’t socialism wonnerful?

  14. #14
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:40 pm, TigerLady said:

    liberals love to burn things

    They burn me up.

  15. #15
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:41 pm, Hanover Fiste said:

    Does this surprise anyone? Just another example of cowardice in the face of Islam.

  16. #16
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:41 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    Last year, the AP didn’t appear to think twice before showing pictures of burned Christian bibles…

    I believe this was said in another thread: that’s because Christians won’t behead you if you get them angry.

  17. #17
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:44 pm, Anachronda said:

    Last year, the AP didn’t appear to think twice before showing pictures of burned Christian bibles

    I’m pretty sure they also showed a burning Koran during Israel’s invasion of Lebanon a few years back. Along with burning stuffed animals and that woman that always shows up holding a couple of bullets and wailing about how her house had been knocked over.

  18. #18
    On September 9th, 2010 at 4:46 pm, Freddy said:

    With this ONE memo, the absolute bias of the AP is on FULL display!

    The AP has admitted that they CENSOR news stories as they see fit!

    How many stories about Barak Obama, and other Democrat politicians, has the AP CENSORED?

    How many stories about Democrats will the AP CENSOR in this election cycle?

    How many FRAUDULENT stories about Republicans does the AP support?

    Are there any more questions regarding WHY most people no longer trust MANY of the media stories?

    Feel free to switch Republican with Democrat in the above questions if you like. The point is that the AP has admitted it is BIASED!

  19. #19
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:00 pm, Ragspierre said:
  20. #20
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:02 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    “With the exception of these specific images and descriptions,”

    So, how are they going to talk about it without talking about it?

  21. #21
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:05 pm, tarpon said:

    Islam is alike a protected cult species or something.

  22. #22
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:06 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I am just afraid that if you burn the Koran, it will multiply. Like the Gremlins. Or cockroaches. Or Moose slums. I hope I’m wrong.

  23. #23
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:14 pm, Lindsay said:

    I don’t want to see anymore photos of Code Pink hags, Michael Moore, or Rep. Waxman’s face–which should be a fair trade with the AP–as they also offend the eyes and cause internal fartwas (fatwas) to us infidels.

  24. #24
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:19 pm, TanyaB said:

    When I first heard about the burning of the Koran, I felt it was provacative, and shouldn’t be done, but now that we have been threatened by these Mohammid worshipers, I say go for it!! I am tired of their blood thirsty rioting at every thing.
    I’m tired of them trying to play victim. And it’s like the veiled threat about the mosque at ground zero. I’m tired of us being the ones to give over to these slaves to the koran.

  25. #25
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:21 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Drudge is reporting that Jones has agreed to call off the burning because he is claiming that Rauf has agreed to move the GZ mosque to a new location.

    This is developing fast. The Donald is involved now too.

  26. #26
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:25 pm, Lindsay said:

    Yeah, Phil, and the Westboro nutjobs are picking up the slack. I hope the media ignore them.

  27. #27
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:25 pm, happyscrapper said:

    If any of these creeps come near me or my family, they will find out how it feels to be beheaded…with an iron skillet. Believe me, they have no idea who they are messing with. I don’t have a gun, but the skillet is always nearby. Actually, I might have a gun…but I’m not telling.

  28. #28
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:25 pm, TanyaB said:

    Yes, I had no sooner posted that a Fox News alert said that the Koran buring was off. Chalk up another win for Muslims!

  29. #29
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:28 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Rauf has agreed to move the GZ mosque to a new location.

    Phil it’s more likely that McCain will become a true conservative. ;)

    I trust that imam as far as I can throw his building. On this one I truly hope I am wrong.

  30. #30
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:28 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:25 pm, happyscrapper said:

    That does it. I am NEVER going to Minnesota. Too dangerous! Crazy ladies beheading people with iron skillets. It’s a horror show!!!

  31. #31
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:28 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Chalk up another win for Muslims!

    ???????????????????????? HUH?

  32. #32
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:29 pm, Flyoverman said:

    ladies beheading people with iron skillets.

    She lies….. They use lefsa pans for the beheadings in Minnesota.

  33. #33
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:32 pm, Ragspierre said:

    From the other thread…

    Just heard on the radio that the crazy camera-whore preacher and the crazy camera-whore imam made a deal; no Cordoba House, no crispy Korans.

    Bets on which one…or both…are lying…

    Also just heard that imam is disowning the report…hard to know what’s what…

  34. #34
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:33 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Tanya, Luftubermann (is that German?):

    Trump has offered to pay 25% more for the majority stake in the GZ mosque investor group. I don’t know if he is just legitimizing the investor group and intending to build the mosque or simply taking control of the project to buy the location by crowding out the other investors or something else.

    This is probably not a win for Muslims. And the Westboro “church” is mainly the pastor’s immediate family. Hardly a church. Just another example of the MSM creating celebrities to justify its agenda. Like Cindy Sheehan.

  35. #35
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:41 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Ya know, I have a hard time believing Rauf believes that the mosque will be built. There is a reason why they only have a few thousand dollars of financing lined up. There is probably a “wait and see” attitude among the secret potential investors. And having the project come to a complete standstill costs money. This impasse could not continue forever.

    This could just be what he needed to back down but save face. It could be that they were just looking for a way out.

  36. #36
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:42 pm, stillontheroad said:

    The AP is Obamas Lapdog as well as there rest of the Alphabet news and I agree – AP has no problem with the Westboro bunch but when it comes to anything Islam related – their collective cans are in the air.

  37. #37
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:42 pm, Ragspierre said:
  38. #38
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:50 pm, Lindsay said:

    That poor Jed Clampett guy fell for the peaceful religion’s taq’qiya.

  39. #39
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:52 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    It is “developing”…

    Yes Rags, thanks for straightening me out by pointing out something I said in my very first comment at 5:21pm. What was I thinking?

  40. #40
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:57 pm, DanMan said:

    I’m going to draw a cartoon of the quran and burn that. Wha’cha think Rageboy would say?

  41. #41
    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:58 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Philly,

    You will, I hope, note the cite to something I thought would benefit others here.

    Sorry if you felt your tail was stepped on, dear.

    Where’s your proof, BTW? You know what I mean.

  42. #42
    On September 9th, 2010 at 6:05 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    I’m going to repeat what I said yesterday

    I don’t like the idea of burning books. Period.

    But it would be interesting if Terry Jones would be willing to gather 1 of each of the world’s religious holy books, and burn them all. It would be interesting to see which religion’s followers are generally tolerant of this offensive act, and which religion’s followers actively seek his execution.

    It would be enlightening to see which religions are truly a “religion of peace”…

  43. #43
    On September 9th, 2010 at 6:05 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Uh…. the link? Maybe you could stop trying to be the moderator at every thread you join in on? Just sayin’. Your act has really gotten old and obnoxious.

  44. #44
    On September 9th, 2010 at 6:06 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Uh…. the link? Maybe you could stop trying to be the moderator at every thread you join in on? Just sayin’. Your act has really gotten old and obnoxious.

    Master Projectionist, Philly.

  45. #45
    On September 9th, 2010 at 6:07 pm, letget said:

    The FL preacher is not going to burn this thing, but that below slug slime phelps said he would. These two, phelps and that FL gay are one and the same. They want to crater us with riots all over the world.
    L

  46. #46
    On September 9th, 2010 at 6:15 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    The picture in this post has a caption which includes the following:

    U.S. Army officials have admitted burning Bibles in Afghanistan.

  47. #47
    On September 9th, 2010 at 6:21 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On the prior thread, WarEagle82 said:

    Remember the outrage and violence unleashed by throngs of Methodists and Presbyterians when the US Army seized thousands of Bibles in Afghanistan and burned them?

    I am trying to recall if the Commanding General or the SecState or AttyGen or President had any comment on this act of destroying sacred texts?

    The linked article says (emphasis mine):

    Military personnel threw away, and ultimately burned, confiscated Bibles that were printed in the two most common Afghan languages amid concern they would be used to try to convert Afghans, a Defense Department spokesman said Tuesday.

    The unsolicited Bibles sent by a church in the United States were confiscated about a year ago at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan because military rules forbid troops of any religion from proselytizing while deployed there

    OK, so if unsolicited Korans were sent to Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, then the same rules would be applied equally and the Korans would be burned, right?

    RIGHT?!?!

    If not, why not?

    Why is the Koran treated with more respect than the Bible?

    Why is it that when Bibles are burned, not even the most “extreme” Christian would even think of beheading someone, but when plans are made to burn a Koran, large numbers of followers of the so-called “religion of peace” threaten executions and mass violence?

  48. #48
    On September 9th, 2010 at 6:23 pm, right_on said:

    Remember that a certain tactical optics company (Trijicon?) that supplies aiming devices for the military’s M-4′s, was chastised, and forced to remove biblical scripture from inside the opticsso as not to offend the Muslims that our soldiers were targeting, and shooting.

    I’m not offended by Trijicon’s practice of offering comforting Christian scriptures inside their optical sights, just as I’m sure Muslims are not offended by the crazed jihadist murderers screaming Allahu Akbar when they fire off their mortar shells, and IED’s at our soldiers….

  49. #49
    On September 9th, 2010 at 6:24 pm, Ragspierre said:

    http://hotair.com/archives/2010/09/09/beyond-belief-koran-burning-called-off-in-exchange-for-moving-ground-zero-mosque/

    More developments…

    (Oh, gawd, I forgot to ask Philly’s permission to post to his Michelle’s site…)

  50. #50
    On September 9th, 2010 at 6:35 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On September 9th, 2010 at 6:23 pm, right_on said:

    It’s like during the first Gulf War when one of the main fears the Saudis had in allowing our troops to be based in their country was the fear that Christian blood might contaminate their sand. In fact, this is even worse. We are ostensibly in Afghanistan fighting for Afghanis. The blood of foreign soldiers dying defending them is an insult?

    Let’s get out of there. It’s just not worth it. There are cheaper ways to defend our national interests that don’t require so much loss of life by Americans.

  51. #51
    On September 9th, 2010 at 6:45 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Actually, right_on, the inscriptions were on the OUTSIDE of the sights, and the people objecting were DOMESTIC crazies.

    http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/slideshow?id=9580847

    I’m sure Muslims are not offended by the crazed jihadist murderers screaming Allahu Akbar when they fire off their mortar shells, and IED’s at our soldiers….

    I say we shoot the spit out of em when they do that…!!!

  52. #52
    On September 9th, 2010 at 6:58 pm, Ragspierre said:

    It’s like during the first Gulf War when one of the main fears the Saudis had in allowing our troops to be based in their country was the fear that Christian blood might contaminate their sand.

    Say, Philly, (con su permiso) I Googled

    Saudi Christian blood sand

    It didn’t return anything LIKE your claim.

    Got a link?

  53. #53
    On September 9th, 2010 at 7:02 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On September 9th, 2010 at 5:28 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    That does it. I am NEVER going to Minnesota. Too dangerous! Crazy ladies beheading people with iron skillets. It’s a horror show!!!

    You’d better believe it! My husband does. And Flyoverman…lefsa pans work pretty well, but not quite heavy enough. They do have sharper edges, though. :wink:

  54. #54
    On September 9th, 2010 at 7:05 pm, sbw999 said:

    Could be looked at 2 ways:

    First, that the elites couldn’t care less about offending Christians by publishing pictures of burnt pages from the Bible. But since Islam is their favorite religion du jour they dont want to do anything that would offend the followers of the religion of peace.

    OR

    Second, that most people understand that if you offend 5th century savages, it could cause them to wreak more mayhem than usual on the world, and the AP is concerned about doing that to their fellow man.

  55. #55
    On September 9th, 2010 at 7:08 pm, Ragspierre said:

    On September 9th, 2010 at 7:05 pm, sbw999 said:

    Nope. It’s BOTH. Remember Comedy Central caving on South Park’s “Mohamed” episode, after lampooning every other religion.

  56. #56
    On September 9th, 2010 at 7:33 pm, sbw999 said:

    On September 9th, 2010 at 7:08 pm, Ragspierre said:

    On September 9th, 2010 at 7:05 pm, sbw999 said:

    Nope. It’s BOTH. Remember Comedy Central caving on South Park’s “Mohamed” episode, after lampooning every other religion.

    I do indeed. But the mayhem they want to avoid is to their own necks. I dont think the elites, including those at the AP, care a lick about the safety of American troops who would probably bare the brunt of insane jihadists over the Kill-ran burnings.

  57. #57
    On September 9th, 2010 at 7:36 pm, Ragspierre said:

    I dont think the elites, including those at the AP, care a lick about the safety of American troops who would probably bare the brunt of insane jihadists over the Kill-ran burnings.

    Likely true.

    They don’t want to incite the mobs, with the death that would result among them…

    THAT they would feel badly about…!!!

  58. #58
    On September 9th, 2010 at 7:42 pm, Member-VRWC said:

    So it is that Muslims always get to define what is and isn’t offensive, aided and abetted by their conspirators in the dinosaur media.

    Examples as dictated by Muslims and their dhimmi followers everywhere:

    – Burning Korans: offensive
    – Burning Bibles: not offensive
    – Putting panties on someone’s head: offensive
    – Cutting off someone’s head: not offensive
    – Getting stoned: offensive
    – Stoning a woman for being a rape victim: not offensive

    Members of the AP can’t wait until tomorrow so they can play their role of Muslim butt-boys all over again.

  59. #59
    On September 9th, 2010 at 7:48 pm, Ragspierre said:

    – Putting panties on someone’s head: offensive

    HIGHLY condition-specific, dude…

  60. #60
    On September 9th, 2010 at 8:26 pm, Republicanvet said:

    AP Press Release

    Memo to AP staff from Standards Center:

    I’m sure several may have said this already, but….

    AP has a Standards Center?

  61. #61
    On September 9th, 2010 at 8:35 pm, WaterBoyz said:

    The Muslims win again and without a suicide bomber or beheading or anyone actually getting killed.

  62. #62
    On September 9th, 2010 at 8:36 pm, Republicanvet said:

    I’m sure the below AP Press Release was previously sent….

    09/09/2010

    AP Press Release

    Memo to AP staff from Standards Center: Guidance – planned Sept. 11 attack site Quran burning Mosque building

    Colleagues,

    As you know, a group known as the Dove World Outreach Center in Gainesville, Fla., Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf group along with Religion of Peace practitioners worldwide has announced that it intends to burn copies of the Quran build a Mosque on the Sept. 11 attack site.
    [...]
    The concept of this planned event is offensive to many Muslims non-muslims worldwide. National leaders and spokesmen for other religious denominations have also found the plan repugnant.

    Should the event happen on Saturday, the AP will not distribute images or audio that specifically show Qurans being burned the Mosque being built, and will not provide detailed text descriptions of the burning building. With the exception of these specific images and descriptions, we expect to cover the Gainesville building event, in all media, placing the actions of this group of about 50 people Religion of Peace practitioners in a clear and balanced context.

  63. #63
    On September 9th, 2010 at 8:36 pm, bjc said:

    *I heard the Pastor actually cancelled the Koran burning due to Publix having run out of hot dogs and marshmallows; Now that’s a travesty! ;)

  64. #64
    On September 9th, 2010 at 8:46 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    Why do people insist on calling this man a ‘kook’. He’s not a kook, he’s not a ‘wackadoodle’. He is engaged in a peaceful protest act.

    I suppose he’d be normal if he talked about the virtues of Islam right before shooting up Muslims in a mosque.

    I’d classify him as an American. he’s exercising his free speech rights. Everyone else is promoting and cheerleading for Islam. . . which is exactly what the 9/11 hijackers want.

    if he doesn’t burn the books, I will be disappointed. . . and yes, the terrorists will have won.

    Now, instead of the Ground Zero Mosque being built to promote tolerance, the imam has said we have to build it to keep Muslims from killing people.

    let me explain something. if this AMERICAN burns these books, and Muslims commit violent acts, MUSLIMS ARE NOT PEACEFUL. The Muslims should be condemned for committing violence.

    This AMERICAN hasn’t done any violence. He’s angry at the ideology that encouraged the 9/11 hijackers. He’s the only sane one in America. The Americans apologizing for Islam on behalf of the 9/11 terrorists are encouraging more 9/11′s because you are all promoting Islam.

    This AMERICAN is the only one reacting as normal human beings would react after 9/11. If Christians killed 3000 Saudis, you can bet they would do more than burn the Bible.

    I am ashamed of America for promoting Sharia on behalf of the 9/11 terrorists.

  65. #65
    On September 9th, 2010 at 9:30 pm, sambo said:

    TooMuchTime said:
    Interesting. They were, however, willing to show and tell us all about the koran being flushed down a toilet.

    When W was POTUS they did everything to piss those mooslims off. With Obama…not so much.

  66. #66
    On September 9th, 2010 at 10:53 pm, Roland said:

    Why do people insist on calling this man a ‘kook’. He’s not a kook, he’s not a ‘wackadoodle’. He is engaged in a peaceful protest act.

    I started out thinking he was a kook, though I expressed some sympathy for the point he was trying to make.

    After seeing the truly astonishing submissiveness toward Islam on this matter expressed by everyone from Petraeus to Palin, I’ve come to realize his Boston Tea Party like burning of the korans may just be coming much too late.

    Our elites sold us out to their greed for petrodollars long, long ago. American power is used almost exclusively for the protection and advancement of so-called ‘moderate’ sharia supporting muslims across the globe, from Bosnia to Kuwait to Saudi Arabia to Kosovo to Indonesia to Afghanistan to Pakistan to Iraq.

    Have we used our power to protect Christians anywhere lately???

    So, no, he should not burn the korans. It makes our masters angry.

  67. #67
    On September 9th, 2010 at 11:38 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Update: Koran Burn Canceled

    AP: Whew! That was close!

  68. #68
    On September 9th, 2010 at 11:39 pm, Flyoverman said:

    After seeing the truly astonishing submissiveness toward Islam on this matter expressed by everyone from Petraeus to Palin, I’ve come to realize his Boston Tea Party like burning of the korans may just be coming much too late.

    What this pastor is going to do is an impotent, meaningless, totally ineffective publicity stunt.

    Maybe he can get the Procrastinator’s Club to burn their draft cards. It’s as equally meaningful. He can also burn Persian rugs to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. Petraeus and Palin know stupidity when they see it.

    Right now there are people effectively doing things to prevent this mosque. They are doing it the American way. They are exposing the Imam for what he really is and eliminating any significant means of funding the project.

    No bucks; no building.

    Americans win wars by defeating the enemy’s logistics before defeating them on the field of battle. No one does it better.

    The more the Imam is exposed the more Americans will be aroused. You want to get Bloomberg to buckle? Confront him with 3 million angry registered NYC voters, then watch his “principles” disappear like a puff of smoke.

    Let’s support these efforts. They are effective.

  69. #69
    On September 9th, 2010 at 11:53 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    This was bad all around. It is now official that you can burn anything you want except the Quran. Anywhere in the world. Dhimmitude is now a global reality. Even among several of us here.

    I guess what we need is a “necessary” provocation. McPalin would have defended a necessary provocation.

    We have our work cut out for us.

  70. #70
    On September 9th, 2010 at 11:58 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    I wonder what outrage dujour is on tomorrow’s menu. I just hope it’s filling!

  71. #71
    On September 10th, 2010 at 12:07 am, right_on said:

    I, for one, will not allow the fear of what jihadists might do dictate what I do or say.

    What our leaders apparently do not understand, is that with this kind of zealosy, their religion is, in fact, their greatest weakness. If the mere threat of defiling a holy object creates as much ignorant reaction by the Muslim masses, imagine what a group of well-educated, and motivated military planners could do…..

  72. #72
    On September 10th, 2010 at 12:34 am, txvet2 said:

    On September 10th, 2010 at 12:07 am, right_on said:

    As excitable as they are, it wouldn’t take much to get them to give us an excuse to nuke them back into the 8th Century – if they weren’t already there.

  73. #73
    On September 10th, 2010 at 1:21 am, Ragspierre said:

    This was bad all around. It is now official that you can burn anything you want except the Quran.

    No, Philly. You can burn anything you want. Go ahead. Nobody cares.

    Burn books, burn flags, burn whatever you want.

    You burned your own credibility here. I’m calling you a liar…again.

    Put up your cites, McPhilly.

  74. #74
    On September 10th, 2010 at 1:54 am, William said:

    Don’t get them mad.

    Ssshhhhh!!!!!

  75. #75
    On September 10th, 2010 at 2:06 am, William said:

    On September 9th, 2010 at 11:58 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    I wonder what outrage dujour is on tomorrow’s menu. I just hope it’s filling!

    That is a mystery.

    I am certain they’ll think of something.

    If not, they’ll likely stage some event on which to express outrage, like a phony afront to Islam perpetrated by Muslims themselves.

    It has happened quite frequently over the past 1400 years, and it can happen again.

    Flushing a Q’ran down the toilet but lying and falsely accusing US soldiers of doing so is just one example.

    Doctoring photographs and adding other, non related photographs, then travelling to Arab-Muslim areas to foment outrage over Jillans-Postens’ Mohammad Cartoons is another example.

    Of course their rabid internet chattering, whisper-down-the-line lie and fabrication machine spreads many of those false claims around the world, inciting more rabid violence and self righteous, but misplaced indignation.

  76. #76
    On September 10th, 2010 at 6:10 am, tbear44 said:

    On September 10th, 2010 at 12:07 am, right_on said:
    As excitable as they are, it wouldn’t take much to get them to give us an excuse to nuke them back into the 8th Century – if they weren’t already there.

    As the great Al Bundy said: “Let’s Rock”

  77. #77
    On September 10th, 2010 at 6:43 am, jlhudg23 said:

    “anti-muslim leader”

    When will these Stone Age media types get it through their thick, neaderthalic, atheistic skulls that being “pro-Christian” does not make someone “anti-muslim”. If Jesus meant what he said (John 14:6), then anyone who claims the name of Christ must in fact believe that all other religions are essentially invalid as means of attaining salvation. And that most assuredly includes Islam, the “religion of peace suicide bombers”.

  78. #78
    On September 10th, 2010 at 7:01 am, RedDog said:

    Christians and Jews don’t cut off the heads of AP editors. I guess that’s the real reason for the double standard.

    The world’s secular elites are really very predictable.

  79. #79
    On September 10th, 2010 at 7:23 am, Beukeboom said:

    Jones cancelled but the Westboro cult (Fred Phelps et al) have announced they will do the Koran burning. Again. They claimed they’ve done it before. Wonder why they didn’t get the same publicity as Jones?

  80. #80
    On September 10th, 2010 at 7:26 am, CO2 Producer said:

    It has happened quite frequently over the past 1400 years

    Bah–just isolated incidents, William.

    Let’s keep our coverage in proportion.

    So says the AP. Yes, like the thirty who haven’t partaken in an act of burning anything yet versus the thousands who have.

  81. #81
    On September 10th, 2010 at 8:08 am, Lockstein13 said:
  82. #82
    On September 10th, 2010 at 8:17 am, ThatSamIAm said:

    The AP like Yahoo and many others are on a crusade to promote the Leftist anti-America agenda. Just look at the % of stories that happen to be negative towards christians, conservatives and republicans. It’s a daily propoganda machine for he Left.

  83. #83
    On September 10th, 2010 at 8:29 am, John Deaux said:

    I was going to comment on this thread and then I noticed that someone had already used the word “NEVER”. My comment also had the word “NEVER” in it. Not wanting to step on his toes, I decided not to, lest I be insulted.

  84. #84
    On September 10th, 2010 at 8:36 am, RobM1981 said:

    Don’t throw away your program and crackerjack just yet. It appears as if the Imam that the pastor talked to might have written promises that he can’t cash, vis’a'vis the mosque moving.

    I’m dying to see what Pastor Pyro is going to do if his muslim pals reneged on him.

    This could get interesting. The liberal media might soil themselves.

    Again.

  85. #85
    On September 10th, 2010 at 9:19 am, sambo said:

    Flyoverman said:
    What this pastor is going to do is an impotent, meaningless, totally ineffective publicity stunt.

    where have you been?

  86. #86
    On September 10th, 2010 at 9:23 am, spaceycakes said:

    John Deaux–don’t ever let me hear you use that word ‘never’.

    nada
    nunca
    nadie

  87. #87
    On September 10th, 2010 at 9:44 am, Flyoverman said:

    On September 10th, 2010 at 9:19 am, sambo said:

    where have you been?

    This morning I had to pick up a few things at the grocery. How about you? Hope you are having a great Friday.

  88. #88
    On September 10th, 2010 at 9:45 am, Flyoverman said:

    On September 10th, 2010 at 9:23 am, spaceycakes said:

    niemals

  89. #89
    On September 10th, 2010 at 11:59 am, TooMuchTime said:

    But it would be interesting if Terry Jones would be willing to gather 1 of each of the world’s religious holy books, and burn them all. It would be interesting to see which religion’s followers are generally tolerant of this offensive act, and which religion’s followers actively seek his execution.

    Great idea. I would be interested to see how the media cover it. They certainly couldn’t say he hated islam since he’d be burning all kinds of religious books.

    The really interesting thing would be how the media reports the reaction to something like this. You know they won’t show the “muslim street” (whatever that is) with Islamic Rage Boy going crazy. They’d probably stage “an interview” with an imam from the U.S. and make sure the Q&A looks like a kids tea party. They’d make sure the christian holymen look like raving lunatics and the imam looks calm, cool, and collected.

    But there’s no bias in the new media.

  90. #90
    On September 10th, 2010 at 12:41 pm, DJM said:

    the AP will not distribute images or audio that specifically show Qurans being burned, and will not provide detailed text descriptions of the burning

    So, why bother reporting it at all then?

    AP: “Something happened in Gainsville, at a little church. We can’t tell you what happened, because it might offend some people. Just trust us, something happened.”

  91. #91
    On September 10th, 2010 at 1:08 pm, TheOtherSide said:

    Fox News said it would not cover it as well. (source)

  92. #92
    On September 10th, 2010 at 2:31 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    Burn Korans?/Qurans?/Queerends? I’m generally opposed to burning books of any sort, but mohammedans are about the last people who should get upset about the destruction of religious artifacts or books. Seriously, fifteen hundred year old works of art were that big a threat to the Taliban and mohammedanists?

    If they want their virgins, I can help them out with that.

    ECS

  93. #93
    On September 11th, 2010 at 12:10 am, travlinman said:

    On September 9th, 2010 at 7:48 pm, Ragspierre said:

    Putting panties on someone’s head: offensive

    HIGHLY condition-specific, dude…

    I worry more about size. I have a fat head!

  94. #94
    On September 11th, 2010 at 12:18 am, travlinman said:

    I’m against burning the Quran (Koran, Korean???) but not on moralistic principles. I am just thrifty and don’t need the heat right now. Wait until maybe January. I may hold my own burning if propane and electricity keep on rising in price.
    As for any of our Islamic friends; when you thoroughly and firmly denounce all terroristic activities committed by your radical brethren, then I will make a little room in my world for pity over the desecration of your holy book. Until then, go screw yourself.

  95. #95
    On September 11th, 2010 at 2:54 pm, ChicagoRobb said:

    I am for the koran burning. To me it is just like burning another unholy book like the Necromicon.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Global Warmists Seek to Flush Out ‘Denier’ Meteorologists

January 30, 2012 04:09 PM by Doug Powers

104 Comments

Cloudy with a chance of fiery death

Editor’s Note of the Day

January 18, 2012 02:36 PM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments

Left Kind of Upset With Politifact’s ‘Lie of the Year’ Choice

December 20, 2011 01:41 PM by Doug Powers

73 Comments

“Throw grandma from the cliff” blowback

MTV Ditches ‘Choose or Lose’ Slogan

December 19, 2011 10:59 AM by Doug Powers

100 Comments

Chose and lost?

MSNBC Leans Forward to Apologize to Mitt Romney

December 15, 2011 04:33 PM by Doug Powers

41 Comments

Sorry we much

Al Sharpton: Parody We Much

December 11, 2011 03:33 PM by Doug Powers

38 Comments

Lib media journos punked by fake SEIU press release

December 7, 2011 09:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments


Categories: Media,Media Bias,The Koran

Gateway Pundit

» Barack The Benevolent
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook