Creepy Harry Reid hands O’Donnell her first general election ad on a silver platter; Updated

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 15, 2010 06:05 PM

Oh, dear. He is so creepy. Ew:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on Wednesday predicted to The Hill that Democratic Senate candidate Chris Coons will safely win the Nov. 2 general election against GOP nominee Christine O’Donnell.

“I’m going to be very honest with you — Chris Coons, everybody knows him in the Democratic caucus. He’s my pet. He’s my favorite candidate,” Reid said.

“Let me tell you about him: A graduate of Yale Divinity School. Yale Law School. A two-time national debate champion. He represents two-thirds of the state now, in an elected capacity. I don’t know if you’ve ever seen him or heard him speak, but he is a dynamic speaker. I don’t mean loud or long; he’s a communicator. So that’s how I feel about Delaware. I’ve always thought Chris Coons is going to win. I told him that and I tried to get him to run. I’m glad he’s running. I just think the world of him. He’s my pet.”

Quick, someone please photoshop Reid as Gollum holding his precious, precious Bearded Marxist Coons.

And go ahead, Democrats. Keep gloating about how you’ve got Delaware in the bag.

***

Update: That was quick. Thank you for the photoshop now featured above, Rob the Designer!

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Politics

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:58 pm, Salt said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:47 pm, right4life said:

    well according to swede, evil people like me helped with the ‘rape’ of his grandchildren….thats debate?

    I did not claim it was. I just called into question the comment that started the slide on this post.

    turnabout is fair play wouldn’t you agree?

    Nope, not if you are also trying to maintain an image of taking the high road.

    It might also be hard to argue turnabout when, on this thread, you cast the first stone.

  2. #102
    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:04 pm, right4life said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:58 pm, Salt said:

    lets see I posted to JD…then swede and chappy chimed in…along with yashmak…

    that should tell you something….but I doubt it will…

  3. #103
    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:06 pm, right4life said:

    and then JD writes about *me* on another blog….

    as he, and the others have proven..its all about me!!!

    :lol:

  4. #104
    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:09 pm, Yashmak said:

    lets see I posted to JD…then swede and chappy chimed in…along with yashmak…

    Yep, I piled on. I freely admit it. Something about pointing out blatant hypocrisy that I just can’t resist :)

  5. #105
    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:16 pm, Salt said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:04 pm, right4life said:

    lets see I posted to JD…then swede and chappy chimed in…along with yashmak…

    that should tell you something….but I doubt it will…

    It’s an open forum. If you are going to post a trolling comment, you should not be surprised when others respond.

    I believe you posted that comment deliberately to provoke a response from both John Deaux and chapoutier. Why wonder then why chap might respond?

  6. #106
    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:18 pm, chapoutier said:

    lets see I posted to JD…

    that should tell you something….but I doubt it will…

    It tells me that you freely admit you “cast the first stone” and that you have a hard time keeping your sad, twisted story of victimization straight.

  7. #107
    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:20 pm, right4life said:

    n September 16th, 2010 at 3:09 pm, Yashmak said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:16 pm, Salt said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:18 pm, chapoutier said:

    this is too funny!!! I should write a book….man I ring the bell…and they drool!!!! :lol:

  8. #108
    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:25 pm, chapoutier said:

    Just so you know, r4l, sentences begin with capital letters. You may have been too distracted picking the imaginary bugs off your skin the day they taught that in 1st grade. But I thought I’d help catch you up.

  9. #109
    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:28 pm, right4life said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:25 pm, chapoutier said:

    I can see why don’t win many cases…

  10. #110
    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:29 pm, right4life said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 3:25 pm, chapoutier said:

    wait I hear an ambulance….go get em chappy!!!

  11. #111
    On September 16th, 2010 at 9:32 pm, RedDog said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 10:22 am, cheapseat said:

    My take, you let people find out what kind of communist whackjob Mr Coon is, and let nature take it’s course. Even Delararians pay taxes.

    Yep. Crap rises.

  12. #112
    On September 16th, 2010 at 10:47 pm, ruffages said:

    Forrest Gump: Coons? Well raccoons tried to get in our back porch, Momma just chase ‘em off with a broom!

  13. #113
    On September 17th, 2010 at 8:32 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 10:47 pm, ruffages said:

    Forrest Gump: Coons? Well raccoons tried to get in our back porch, Momma just chase ‘em off with a broom!

    Classic!

  14. #114
    On September 17th, 2010 at 10:38 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    chap…

    “that you have a hard time keeping your sad, twisted story of victimization straight.”

    Keeping it straight doesn’t matter. All that matters to right… chap is when right… decides right… has won the argument.

  15. #115
    On September 17th, 2010 at 10:50 am, Salt said:

    On September 17th, 2010 at 10:38 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    I did not understand your last sentence. Am I missing some context from previous threads?

  16. #116
    On September 17th, 2010 at 11:45 am, chapoutier said:

    I did not understand your last sentence. Am I missing some context from previous threads?

    He was just poking fun at r4l’s scatterbrained writing style. In non-crazy-person-speak:

    All that matters to right4life, chap, is when right4life decides right4life has won the argument.

    At least I think.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Subscribe to the Michelle Malkin newsletter

February 22, 2012 12:44 PM by Michelle Malkin

33 Comments

Surprise: UK’s Version of ‘Buffett Rule’ Failing to Bring in Expected Revenue

February 22, 2012 11:05 AM by Doug Powers

53 Comments

Pency-wise, pound foolish

The high priests of eco-destruction

February 22, 2012 07:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

124 Comments

Carney: Obama Didn’t Deny Keystone Permit

February 21, 2012 04:45 PM by Doug Powers

82 Comments

Republican politics killed the pipeline

Gallup: Unemployment Climbing Back to 9% for February

February 21, 2012 02:56 PM by Doug Powers

70 Comments

At least gas prices are dropping — wait, nevermind

Disability Claims Up As Unemployment Benefits Run Out

February 19, 2012 11:16 PM by Doug Powers

70 Comments

One of Obama’s Biggest Opponents in 2012

February 19, 2012 02:54 PM by Doug Powers

109 Comments

Gas pains

It Wouldn’t Be Saturday Morning Without Another Friday Night Solyndra Document Dump to Sift Through

February 18, 2012 09:52 AM by Doug Powers

41 Comments

Selective transparency under cover of weekend, part VI


Categories: Politics

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook