Creepy Harry Reid hands O’Donnell her first general election ad on a silver platter; Updated

By Michelle Malkin  •  September 15, 2010 06:05 PM

Oh, dear. He is so creepy. Ew:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on Wednesday predicted to The Hill that Democratic Senate candidate Chris Coons will safely win the Nov. 2 general election against GOP nominee Christine O’Donnell.

“I’m going to be very honest with you — Chris Coons, everybody knows him in the Democratic caucus. He’s my pet. He’s my favorite candidate,” Reid said.

“Let me tell you about him: A graduate of Yale Divinity School. Yale Law School. A two-time national debate champion. He represents two-thirds of the state now, in an elected capacity. I don’t know if you’ve ever seen him or heard him speak, but he is a dynamic speaker. I don’t mean loud or long; he’s a communicator. So that’s how I feel about Delaware. I’ve always thought Chris Coons is going to win. I told him that and I tried to get him to run. I’m glad he’s running. I just think the world of him. He’s my pet.”

Quick, someone please photoshop Reid as Gollum holding his precious, precious Bearded Marxist Coons.

And go ahead, Democrats. Keep gloating about how you’ve got Delaware in the bag.

***

Update: That was quick. Thank you for the photoshop now featured above, Rob the Designer!

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Politics

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:11 pm, letget said:

    Oh gosh, for a minute I thought that picture was of dear nan without her weekly botox!
    L

  2. #2
    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:13 pm, Lindsay said:

    Hilarious! “My little pretty.”

    How bizarre.

  3. #3
    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:15 pm, Regulus said:

    And go ahead, Democrats. Keep gloating about how you’ve got Delaware in the bag.

    I think they’ll be happy to oblige you, when they’re not busy painting O’Donnell as an extremist nut-job.

  4. #4
    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:18 pm, thirteen28 said:

    Awesome! He’s already handed a campaign ad to Sharron Angle with his hare-brained idea of putting the DREAM act in the defense appropriations bill, and now this??

    Thank YOU, Harry!!!

  5. #5
    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:18 pm, Truesoldier said:

    I don’t mean loud or long; he’s a communicator.

    Sooo let me guess…he has a teleprompter.

  6. #6
    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:30 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    There is no way Christine O’Donnell will win this race. Only the Democrats can lose it. That’s their specialty.

  7. #7
    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:31 pm, BB said:

    From the Bearded Marxist story:

    For Coons, Kenya was an especially jarring experience that significantly influenced his already-changing political beliefs. He wrote that he was particularly troubled by his experience with Kenyan elites, who he said were utterly dismissive of the poor.

    Dismissive poverty-creating/exploiting Kenyan elites?

    Sounds familiar…

  8. #8
    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:35 pm, Common Sense said:

    He represents two-thirds of the state now,

    Even creepier, does he mean that elected officials only represent those who voted for them? I always thought that they were supposed to represent ALL of us.

  9. #9
    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:39 pm, cabrerski said:

    Harry,

    Don’t forget to spay/neuter your pets.

  10. #10
    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:44 pm, Member-VRWC said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:30 pm, Red State Skeptic said:
    There is no way Christine O’Donnell will win this race. Only the Democrats can lose it. That’s their specialty.

    I’d be willing to bet that not a lot of John Q Public types right now in any state are jumping up and down in anticipation of voting for an assclown that bills himself as the Bearded Marxist.

    And I seem to recall that in 2008 you said that the tide had turned so far against the conservative message and so in favor of the liberal message that there wouldn’t be a chance of a Republican majority again in your lifetime. What? Is your demise imminent? Or should we just presume that your predictions aren’t worth the screen they’re printed on.

  11. #11
    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:53 pm, tre said:

    While I’ll admit Christine O’Donnell has a lot to do and not much time in which to do it, Marco Rubio was once in her position, and now he’s leading. Also, she was once WAAAAY behind Castle, and shot to the lead in only a couple of weeks.
    She can still pull it off.
    And, right now, many dims are practically handing Republicans the very rocks Repubs can throw back at them.

  12. #12
    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:58 pm, iamsaved said:

    The Tea Party isn’t only those who make the most noise and claim they are the spokesmen/women for the movement. The Tea Party are those who are quietly and patiently biding their time waiting for the right opportunity to remove all Democrats from office – national and local. And, we don’t want to leave the RINOs out. I for one would rather a flaming liberal in a liberal state win the election then to have a wolf in sheeps clothing hiding in the wings. It’s much easier to see the opposing team when they wear a different uniform.

    If O’Donnell doesn’t have the character, integrity, or ability to represent the conservative view point if elected then she can be removed in six years. That would be much easier to do then try and pry and old, crusty establishment politician who feels he’s entitled to the position and all the trappings that go with it.

  13. #13
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:03 pm, T-Bone said:

    Great picture. Coons could be a little more defined but Harry Gollum is precious.

    Pet, my vote, pretty now.
    Elites, America me now like not.

    Also, Now I know 2 people who went to Kenya and now hate America. For the life of me, I don’t know why they don’t just go live in Kenya if America is so bad.

  14. #14
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:05 pm, T-Bone said:

    I know theres a joke in there somewhere.

  15. #15
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:07 pm, Member-VRWC said:

    Actually, the voters in DE would only have to wait 4 years to vote out either of them. This is the seat that was won by BiteMe in 2008. He gave it up when he became VP and a placeholder was appointed until the next election (this one). Whoever wins this election will come back before the voters in 2014.

  16. #16
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:07 pm, docflash said:

    We know Harry is a cur so is his “pet”a pedigree or a mongrel?

  17. #17
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:14 pm, Roland said:

    Even creepier, does he mean that elected officials only represent those who voted for them? I always thought that they were supposed to represent ALL of us.

    That is not what it means. In states with small populations sometimes an office which is not technically statewide can represent most of the state’s population.

  18. #18
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:16 pm, J.J. Sefton said:

    I will again say nothing to jinx Christine, but Harry Reid and the Dems are the gifts that keep on giving. Sadly, our party-of-record (aka Republican Party) always fouled it up.

    I actually almost want to see Christine and all the Tea Party candidates win just to spite the establishment Republican Party even more than the Dems.

  19. #19
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:21 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    Great photoshop work.

  20. #20
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:25 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Another excellent example for why there is no seat we cannot win and why there is no such thing as an “unelectable” conservative. Ideas and arguments just keep popping up out of nowhere. Fishermen refer to this kind of mojo as “fish jumping in the boat”.

  21. #21
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:27 pm, John Deaux said:

    Am I the only one who would find it and insult to be called someone’s pet?

  22. #22
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:35 pm, sbw999 said:

    That photoshop gets an A++.

    “My pet”…that’s downright creepy…as hell.

  23. #23
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:38 pm, tiefelj said:

    I can almost see Mae West and W.C Field in My Little Chickadee

    http://tinyurl.com/My-Little-Chickadee

  24. #24
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:39 pm, swede said:

    Another excellent example for why there is no seat we cannot win and why there is no such thing as an “unelectable” conservative.

    Mouse in your pocket Phil? Exactly who are you referring to with we? Never could quite grasp that one.

    BTW, do you think Palin is electable?

  25. #25
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:40 pm, J.J. Sefton said:

    #25 tiefelj:

    Harry, peel me a commie.”

  26. #26
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:45 pm, Roland said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:27 pm, John Deaux said:
    Am I the only one who would find it and insult to be called someone’s pet?

    It is insulting, unless he was using it as a ‘pet’ name for his lover.

    Reid is such a freak.

  27. #27
    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:48 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    JD,

    Naw, Bev calls me that all of the time. If she called YOU that…well…

    Just think of it like Coons is a great communicator and Harry is just a little taken in by him. I mean, it could be worse. He could be in love with Rangel.

  28. #28
    On September 15th, 2010 at 8:50 pm, right4life said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:27 pm, John Deaux said:

    Am I the only one who would find it and insult to be called someone’s pet?

    I thought you were chappy’s pet.

  29. #29
    On September 15th, 2010 at 9:03 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 6:30 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    There is no way Christine O’Donnell will win this race. Only the Democrats can lose it. That’s their specialty.

    Battleground poll: question D3 indicates otherwise.

  30. #30
    On September 15th, 2010 at 9:04 pm, cicerokid said:

    No news here. We had a pet ‘coon when I was growing up. He ate canned dog food and crawdads. ‘Coons don’t remain docile long in captivity and are prone to distemper, rabies, and a variety of parasitic infections. For what it’s worth: ‘coons are at home in the swamp.

    ‘Coons can be baked at 350 degrees for one and one half hour. Add sweet taters half way through baking. Let cool, throw the coon away and eat the taters.

  31. #31
    On September 15th, 2010 at 9:10 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 9:04 pm, cicerokid said:

    LOL loved this post.

    I am so glad dinner has beeno over for awhile. ;)

  32. #32
    On September 15th, 2010 at 9:43 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    I want to see barry done up this way…lol

  33. #33
    On September 15th, 2010 at 9:46 pm, Savage24 said:

    Between him and Nancy they are throwing enough gasoline on the fire of freedom to keep this grass roots revolution burning forever. God I love those two idiots.

  34. #34
    On September 15th, 2010 at 10:00 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Gollum:I’ve always thought Chris Coons is going to win.

    Not if the tricksy hobbitses have anything to say about it!

  35. #35
    On September 15th, 2010 at 10:46 pm, John Deaux said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 8:50 pm, right4life said:

    I thought you were chappy’s pet.

    Thinking never was your strong suit, now was it?

    It’s a real shame a valued poster like Ragspierre gets banned for posting the same thing you write regularly. The only purpose you serve here is to lower the average IQ.

  36. #36
    On September 15th, 2010 at 10:57 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    He wrote that he was particularly troubled by his experience with Kenyan elites, who he said were utterly dismissive of the poor

    He doesn’t mean Barack and Bro does he?

  37. #37
    On September 15th, 2010 at 10:58 pm, rightisright said:

    Rags was 86′d?

  38. #38
    On September 15th, 2010 at 10:59 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    It’s a real shame a valued poster like Ragspierre gets banned

    There’s a reason they allow refills on meds. Just sayin’…

  39. #39
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:00 pm, right4life said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 10:46 pm, John Deaux said:

    looks like I struck a nerve!! :lol:

  40. #40
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:00 pm, swede said:

    I thought R4L was the malodorous deposit left on the newspaper by chappy’s pet. You’re a piece of work.

  41. #41
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:03 pm, right4life said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:00 pm, swede said:

    its called projection…let me guess you must be another moderate rinosaur!!

    I don’t remember talking to you…guess the truth hurts…

  42. #42
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    swede, swede, swede…

    The fact that I would sooner allow cat crap in my home than let r4l through my door should tell you something.

    In other words, take back that scurrilous comparison you just made. The litter box is howling in anger at you right now.

  43. #43
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:13 pm, right4life said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:11 pm, chapoutier said

    don’t worry..I never go to trailer parks!

  44. #44
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:15 pm, right4life said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    I’m surprised you and jd are still here…guess they didn’t take out all the trash…

  45. #45
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:15 pm, chapoutier said:

    Of course you don’t. They probably don’t allow you out of the padded room at all.

  46. #46
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:16 pm, right4life said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:15 pm, chapoutier said:

    I wouldn’t know about padded rooms…but I’ll take your word for it…you’re the expert in that area….

  47. #47
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:19 pm, John Deaux said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:15 pm, right4life said:

    Mmmmmm, Juicy Fruit.

  48. #48
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:19 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 10:46 pm, John Deaux said:

    It’s a real shame a valued poster like Ragspierre gets banned

    How did you find out?

  49. #49
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:20 pm, right4life said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:19 pm, John Deaux said:

    another demonstration of your IQ.. :lol:

  50. #50
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:24 pm, chapoutier said:

    You know…I always wondered what the love child of Patrick Bateman and Eleanor “Crazy Cat Lady” Abernathy would be like.

    I need imagine no more. Thank you, r4l.

  51. #51
    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:25 pm, right4life said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:24 pm, chapoutier said:

    let me guess…you’re parents are charles manson, and lynette ‘squeaky’ fromm…

  52. #52
    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:02 am, swede said:

    Flyoverman said:

    How did you find out?

    Check comments here.

    I emailed Michelle on Rags behalf, but no response yet. It would be nice if others folks might hefollowed up.

    The pieces of sheistenkaka behind this are the ones that should have been booted. Serious Rectal Cranial Inversion going on around here.

  53. #53
    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:06 am, Ron said:

    So if Harry Reid is Gollum, and Coons is his Precious, what does that make Karl Rove? Overcome by the Dark Tower, he was.

  54. #54
    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:39 am, Truesoldier said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:06 am, Ron said:
    So if Harry Reid is Gollum, and Coons is his Precious, what does that make Karl Rove? Overcome by the Dark Tower, he was.

    Acutually, Rove does kinda look like the stoogie that was controlling the Kings mind before Gandalf released the King from the spell.

  55. #55
    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:03 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    HI THIRTEEN28–#4. Good catch–Dingy Harry Reid attaching the DREAM act to the Defense Appropriation Bill should be a great round of ammo for Sherrie Angle to use to blast him back 5 points in the election.
    ***
    Harry’s DREAM should be a nightmare to legal residents and citizens of Nevada and the U.S.A. When out of state students come to UNR or UNLV they have to pay the out of state tuition rate of 300 percent more.
    ***
    Some states–Kalifornia is one–Taxachussetts is another–give in state tuition rates to ILLEGAL ALIENS-(aka “undocumented immigrants”). And I think the DREAM act will pick the taxpayers pockets again and make tuition free for them.
    ***
    Mexico gives illegal aliens a ride to the border and a boot in the butt across the frontera–after robbing and abusing them first. Our socialists / marxists give illegals benefits legal U.S. citizens can’t get.
    ***
    REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER–Send Harry back to Searchlight, Nevada.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  56. #56
    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:25 am, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    That’s exactly what we need to do. Tie Coons in with Reid, Pelosi and Obama.

    63% of people in Delaware are not happy with government.

  57. #57
    On September 16th, 2010 at 5:48 am, Cameron said:

    Does this mean Reid talks about him like a dog?

    Sorry. Couldn’t resist.

  58. #58
    On September 16th, 2010 at 6:54 am, RedDog said:

    Just when you think Dems can’t get any creepier. The Photoshop is perfect.

  59. #59
    On September 16th, 2010 at 7:49 am, right4life said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:02 am, swede said:

    thanks for the link!

    I enjoy reading paranoid rantings..

    yeah its all a conspiracy!! :rolleyes:

    I am really glad I get under jd’s skin so!

  60. #60
    On September 16th, 2010 at 8:32 am, stillontheroad said:

    Funny thing is, I can actually see ole Harry squatting in some cave somewhere gnawing on a raw catfish with his eyes rolling back in his head and feeling total bliss.

  61. #61
    On September 16th, 2010 at 8:36 am, babiesgrandma said:

    Aside from all the other stuff above…

    But, Harry, is your “Pet” a CLEAN pet?

  62. #62
    On September 16th, 2010 at 8:53 am, 123upnorth said:

    Reid couldn’t have given a worse endorsement speech than that. So, Americans are supposed to endorse Coons because he graduated from an Ivy League School and is both a dynamic speaker and good communicator?

    Hmm. Doesn’t that sound awfully similar to someone else who is holding a high level government position right now?

    Reid meet Obama. Obama meet Reid.

    When I heard Democrats talk about how their policies were sound but their messaging was weak, I thought that was cover because they couldn’t brainstorm any solutions to their electoral problems, yet after hearing Reid’s endorsement of Coon, I guess they do believe what they say. They really think if they just change the drapes and put a new coat of paint on the walls, they’ll be able to sell their party in the upcoming election.

  63. #63
    On September 16th, 2010 at 9:22 am, McCloud9 said:

    Please Harry… Have YOUR Pet Spayed or Nuedered. Let the dirty gene pool end here, its the Right thing to do.

  64. #64
    On September 16th, 2010 at 9:34 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    eat the taters.

    fine advice there Kid ;)

  65. #65
    On September 16th, 2010 at 9:40 am, stillontheroad said:

    Coon: What we need is a few good taters.
    Harry: What’s taters, precious? What’s taters, eh?
    Coons: *Po-tay-toes!* Boil ‘em, mash ‘em, stick ‘em in a stew… Lovely big golden chips with a nice piece of fried fish.
    [Harry makes a noise of disgust while sticking his tongue out]
    Coons: Even you couldn’t say no to that.
    Harry: Oh yes we could. Spoilin’ nice fish. Give it to us raw and w-r-r-riggling; you keep nasty chips.
    Coons: You’re hopeless but I am stiil your pet.

  66. #66
    On September 16th, 2010 at 9:48 am, mytake said:

    O’ Donnell way behind in polls. This will require a lot of work!

  67. #67
    On September 16th, 2010 at 9:49 am, mytake said:

    I don’t know how you overcome 51% sure Democrat voting?

  68. #68
    On September 16th, 2010 at 9:51 am, mytake said:

    We need Obama to help us by opening divorce records on the Dem or some other underhanded Dem trick. Oh teach us Great one!

  69. #69
    On September 16th, 2010 at 10:22 am, cheapseat said:

    Mytake, you let people find out what kind of communist whackjob Mr Coon is, and let nature take it’s course. Even Delararians pay taxes.

  70. #70
    On September 16th, 2010 at 10:28 am, frostrt said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:27 pm, John Deaux said:
    Am I the only one who would find it and insult to be called someone’s pet?

    —————————————-

    No, you’re not.

    It’s one step above Reid saying that Coons is the “submissive” to his “dominant”, if you get my drift. All Christine O’Donnell needs to do is run that quote of Reid calling Coons his “pet” over and over again – no one wants to vote for someone who will be a “pet” to the current Washington establishment – O’Donnell’s victory in the primary shows that.

  71. #71
    On September 16th, 2010 at 10:33 am, thejim said:

    I think that O’Donnell will win it handily. This election is no longer Dem versus Repub, it’s Citizen versus Ruling Class Masters. The DE voters aren’t fooled by the usual crap coming from either Party. The November election will be different from anything we’ve seen in the past.

  72. #72
    On September 16th, 2010 at 10:51 am, Yashmak said:

    The DE voters aren’t fooled by the usual crap coming from either Party.

    – thejim

    Apparently in this case, they’re fooled by the UN-usual crap coming from the Tea Party. I cannot understand the celebration by the folks here of the nomination of this individual. A short websearch turns up veritable mountains of reasons she will be a breeze to campaign against. Her extreme soc-con positions aside, her outlandish paranoid pronouncements aside. . .it’s shocking the number of items she has in her past (mortgage defaults, unpaid taxes, etc. etc) that are no different than items lambasted by commentors and writers at this very blog. . .when they appear in a liberal pol’s past.

    I agree with a lot of what the Tea Party stands for, but that doesn’t mean for one moment that they’re any more immune than the Dems/Republicans to picking a stinker of a candidate every now and then.

  73. #73
    On September 16th, 2010 at 10:51 am, Salt said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 8:50 pm, right4life said:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 7:27 pm, John Deaux said:

    Am I the only one who would find it and insult to be called someone’s pet?

    I thought you were chappy’s pet.

    What’s the point of this? It seems rather childish considering John’s post was both on topic and something on which I believe most everyone here would agree.

    On September 16th, 2010 at 7:49 am, right4life said:

    I am really glad I get under jd’s skin so!

    Yet you are the one starting the provocation on this thread. Seems it’s more like John has gotten under your skin.

    I must be late to this flame war, but I know John to be a reasonable commenter here. Would someone care to point out why that might not be true?

  74. #74
    On September 16th, 2010 at 11:20 am, chapoutier said:

    Don’t mind r4l, Salt. He’s just on another ‘roid bender.

  75. #75
    On September 16th, 2010 at 11:29 am, swede said:

    I am really glad I get under jd’s skin so!

    As in a fungal parasite. Appropo indeed.

    FYI my fine fungal friend, I voted against Obama – McClown being a necessary evil. On every planet except the one you/Phil et al occupy, an electable RINO is preferable to an unelectable hardcore conservative. If indeed you/Phil et al represent just 5% of the electorate – you are partially responsible for the rape being propagated upon my grandchildren’s future. Nice work.

    Rags sends greetings to all and some compelling thoughts here.

    Appologies for indulging the ad hominem food fight. No mas. I’ll be canvassing this afternoon for Mike Crane who won the primary and is well positioned to remove a House seat from HopeyChangeyLand. He could use some help if anyone is so inclined. Thanks.

  76. #76
    On September 16th, 2010 at 11:36 am, LerP said:

    Most be James Carville’s twin.

  77. #77
    On September 16th, 2010 at 11:39 am, jlhudg23 said:

    Does Coons speak with a “Caucasian dialect“? Eh, Harry?

  78. #78
    On September 16th, 2010 at 11:43 am, swede said:

    He’s just on another ‘roid bender.

    An astute ascertation from our consumate curmudgeon counselor! Good to see you pssn off the proletariat again.

    A word of caution – If the ambulance has to brake hard, you could get a nasty bump on the head. Be careful please. :oops:

  79. #79
    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:15 pm, right4life said:

    What’s the point of this? It seems rather childish considering John’s post was both on topic and something on which I believe most everyone here would agree.

    an experiment…I rang the bell…just checking if JD would drool….

    I must be late to this flame war, but I know John to be a reasonable commenter here. Would someone care to point out why that might not be true?

    John likes to turn any thread I enter from the subject to being all about me…and you can see chappy and swede are only too happy to oblige!

    apparently the truth really rattles their cages…and they cannot stand to be disagreed with…

  80. #80
    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:18 pm, right4life said:

    . On every planet except the one you/Phil et al occupy, an electable RINO is preferable to an unelectable hardcore conservative

    yeah they said the same thing about Reagan..that dangerous cowboy!!

    If indeed you/Phil et al represent just 5% of the electorate – you are partially responsible for the rape being propagated upon my grandchildren’s future. Nice work.

    laughable….I guess you prefer the ‘slow rape’ that bush was doing…. :lol:

    Rags sends greetings to all and some compelling thoughts here.

    why are you wackos SO obsessed with me?

  81. #81
    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:31 pm, John Deaux said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 11:29 am,
    Rags sends greetings to all and some compelling thoughts here.

    Apparently r4l should be called asymptote.

  82. #82
    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:34 pm, right4life said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:31 pm, John Deaux said:

    so when are you going to make your feelings known?

  83. #83
    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:40 pm, chapoutier said:

    why are you wackos SO obsessed with me?

    Why is anyone fascinated by a train wreck? Why are the awful American Idol auditions always the most watched?

    It is a side of humanity, not a pretty one–but a side nonetheless, that has existed for as long as we have.

    That side of us that can look at an unhinged buffoon like you and know that, no matter how bad it is for us right now, at least we are not that far gone.

  84. #84
    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:42 pm, right4life said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:40 pm, chapoutier said:

    no surprise that you low-esteem losers have to put others down to feel better about yourselves…

    I know you hate me because I make you look foolish…but I don’t make you look foolish…you do, with every post.

  85. #85
    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:52 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 5:48 am, Cameron said:

    Does this mean Reid talks about him like a dog?

    That’s classic.

    Is Obama Reid’s “pet”, too?

  86. #86
    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:54 pm, chapoutier said:

    no surprise that you low-esteem losers have to put others down to feel better about yourselves…

    Okay, champ.

    It is amazing the depths of delusion you must plumb to keep telling yourself, despite the near universal revulsion people here have for you, that the problem lies with everyone else and not you.

    Like I said: a preening narcissist with an ego that bruises easier than a banana peel.

  87. #87
    On September 16th, 2010 at 1:03 pm, swede said:

    The fact that you think Rags is writing about you and you perceive people as obsessed with you should tell you something. Freudian jackpot. Don’t worry, it’s not that small. Get some help/meds.

    So many cretins. So little time.

  88. #88
    On September 16th, 2010 at 1:03 pm, Yashmak said:

    no surprise that you low-esteem losers have to put others down to feel better about yourselves…

    -r4l

    Of course it doesn’t surprise you. It’s all you ever do.

  89. #89
    On September 16th, 2010 at 1:07 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    Ah the question of the ages. Which comes first, the whacko-ness or the obsession with Chap?

  90. #90
    On September 16th, 2010 at 1:07 pm, DBNinKY said:

    There is no way Christine O’Donnell will win this race. Only the Democrats can lose it. That’s their specialty.

    It may be difficult but not impossible. O’Donnell’s fresh-faced enthusiasm and energy – especially when on full display in debate with her same-ol’-same opponent – will prove appealing to most independent voters and are likely to carry her far in the election.

  91. #91
    On September 16th, 2010 at 1:44 pm, right4life said:

    despite the near universal revulsion people here have for you, that the problem lies with everyone else and not you.

    Like I said: a preening narcissist with an ego that bruises easier than a banana peel.

    another case of projection. perhaps you should get off the drugs, and on some meds.

    On September 16th, 2010 at 1:03 pm, Yashmak said:

    right, thats why rags was banned….poor baby!

    On September 16th, 2010 at 1:03 pm, swede said:

    you sure are obsessed with me…and your friend rags was banned because he made a homo-erotic reference when posting to me…

    and who writes about me on other blogs?? hmmmmm??

    talk about needing help…wow.

  92. #92
    On September 16th, 2010 at 1:46 pm, right4life said:

    tell me swede, aren’t you really upset that castle lost? that your ‘moderate’ rinos are falling like dominos??

    and you have to vent all that hatred and rage against real conservatives.

    I understand…loser.

  93. #93
    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:12 pm, chapoutier said:

    another case of projection. perhaps you should get off the drugs, and on some meds.

    Ahhh…the modern day “I know you are but what am I.” So clever of you!

    Honestly, I have never seen anyone lay so bare their pathology as you do, r4l. You can tell just from your writing style that you are a schizo.

  94. #94
    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:15 pm, right4life said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:12 pm, chapoutier said:

    amazing how someone with all that ‘pathology’ can make a ‘lurned’ lawyer like you look stupid.

    I can tell from your writings that you’re a liar….er lawyer…oh whats the difference?

  95. #95
    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:20 pm, Salt said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:15 pm, right4life said:

    an experiment…I rang the bell…just checking if JD would drool….

    ….

    John likes to turn any thread I enter from the subject to being all about me…and you can see chappy and swede are only too happy to oblige!

    He didn’t do that in this thread, so your premise of “any thread you enter” is blown. In fact, considering that I only saw this thread, it looks like this is precisely what you were doing.

    You can call it an experiment if that makes you feel better, but it sure looks like trolling to me.

    On September 16th, 2010 at 12:42 pm, right4life said:

    no surprise that you low-esteem losers have to put others down to feel better about yourselves…

    You do realize that you contradict yourself in the same sentence here, right?

    …and clearly you’re not above the fray:

    On September 15th, 2010 at 8:50 pm, right4life said:

    I thought you were chappy’s pet.

    On September 15th, 2010 at 11:13 pm, right4life said:

    don’t worry..I never go to trailer parks!

    On September 16th, 2010 at 1:46 pm, right4life said:

    I understand…loser.

  96. #96
    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:22 pm, chapoutier said:

    You do realize that you contradict yourself in the same sentence here, right?

    Like I said Salt, r4l is, among many many other things, a schizo. Can’t even keep a thought straight from the beginning of a sentence to the end, let alone from post to post.

  97. #97
    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:24 pm, right4life said:

    He didn’t do that in this thread, so your premise of “any thread you enter” is blown. In fact, considering that I only saw this thread, it looks like this is precisely what you were doing.

    yes he’s just a victim…and I’m a mean old troll…do you feel better now?

    poor johnny…sniff…sniff…I’ve gone out of my way to make people like him and chappy, and swede look stupid….and I do enjoy it…

    its a weakness… :lol:

  98. #98
    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:26 pm, right4life said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:22 pm, chapoutier said:

    and I’m always on your mind :lol:

    have you ever figured out the mechanism for evolution? :lol:

  99. #99
    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:38 pm, Salt said:

    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:24 pm, right4life said:

    yes he’s just a victim…and I’m a mean old troll…do you feel better now?

    Nope. Just wondering if reasoned debate is still something that is respected around here.

    Do the flame wars make you feel better? Should conservatives divide into two camps? That hardly seems productive.

    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:24 pm, right4life said:

    poor johnny…sniff…sniff…I’ve gone out of my way to make people like him and chappy, and swede look stupid….and I do enjoy it…

    its a weakness… :lol:

    At least you are acknowledging it’s a weak argument to “go out of your way” to throw off-topic ad hominem attacks at other commenters while simultaneously claiming they are the ones doing it to you in “any thread you enter”.

  100. #100
    On September 16th, 2010 at 2:47 pm, right4life said:

    Do the flame wars make you feel better? Should conservatives divide into two camps? That hardly seems productive.

    well according to swede, evil people like me helped with the ‘rape’ of his grandchildren….thats debate?

    At least you are acknowledging it’s a weak argument to “go out of your way” to throw off-topic ad hominem attacks at other commenters while simultaneously claiming they are the ones doing it to you in “any thread you enter”.

    turnabout is fair play wouldn’t you agree?

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook