Out: Palin’s a McCarthyite — In: Palin’s the Anti-Christ
**Written by Doug Powers
The AFL-CIO organized a protest of Sarah Palin’s appearance in Louisville, Kentucky this week, and they helped keep it classy. I guess calling Palin the second coming of Joe McCarthy wasn’t moving votes towards Democrats fast enough, so now it’s being ratcheted up a notch to “anti-Christ.”
Here’s the sign held by a protester named Doris Beeler:
Can you believe that? I know… everything’s spelled correctly. We should expect nothing less from someone involved in higher education (the University of Louisville should be beaming with pride at the intelligence of members of their resident advisory council).
Click the pic to roll tape. The moonbat fun starts at about 1:10…
Beeler also apparently has (or had) a beef with the Social Security Administration. Can somebody please tell her Palin doesn’t work for the SSA? Maybe it’s all a big misunderstanding.
**Written by Doug Powers
Twitter @ThePowersThatBe
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 |
S.E. Cupp, Hustler, and the four stages of conservative female abuse
May 23, 2012 02:13 PM by Michelle Malkin
142 CommentsPalin officially endorses desperate, clingy Orrin Hatch; time to rally around Dan Liljenquist
May 22, 2012 11:32 PM by Michelle Malkin
84 CommentsVideo: Unhinged, bat-wielding Big Labor thug of the day repeatedly whacks Nikki Haley pinata
May 22, 2012 03:01 PM by Michelle Malkin
70 Comments
Noted MSNBC mocker of Sarah Palin’s intellect doesn’t do so well on Jeopardy
May 15, 2012 10:33 AM by Doug Powers
82 Comments
50 Occupiers show up at courthouse in support of bridge bomb suspects who in no way represent Occupy movement
May 8, 2012 02:44 PM by Doug Powers
57 Comments
May Day Occupiers offer quaint alternatives to capitalism
May 3, 2012 03:51 PM by Doug Powers
69 Comments
MSM: Occupiers Anarchists arrested for bridge bomb plot
May 2, 2012 11:45 AM by Doug Powers
79 Comments
“Happy May Day, now go kill”
May 1, 2012 01:02 PM by Michelle Malkin
73 CommentsEverything you need to know about Occupy in one photo
May 1, 2012 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin
158 Comments
Categories: Moonbats,Sarah Palin,Unions
Babalu Blog
» U.S. Manned Space Flight in The 21st CenturyVillainous Company
» Must Read Post of the Day. Possibly, the YearRedstate
» Kimberlin’s Associates Caught on Tape?
What these people just don’t understand is that we Tea Party conservatives live in the modern world and in the 21st century. These 3rd world arguments right out of the Dark Ages just don’t resonate with us. The more the persist with this nonsense, the stronger we get.
Maybe they aren’t saying it loud enough, not enough feeling. Maybe it would help if they start beating us over the head while they are explaining things to us? It’s coming. Wait for it.
First! Woohoo! Now I can take the afternoon off while my personal Clingon Trolls pick up where they left off in the other threads.
The left just cannot handle that she may whip them in 2010 and possibly in 2012.
Go Sarah
What does the Bible say about “antichrist”?
Four verses use that exact word.
Read them for yourself.
You never know… Maybe that time when she looked at the writing on her hand, the numbers 6 6 6 were inscribed on it.
What is sad is there are folks who actually believe Palin is the anti-Christ. Those folks can get a driver’s license, a gun permit and can procreate.
Sarah Palin is not an/the antichrist.
Sarah Palin is the Anti-Obama.
A post I wrote way back on September 4, 2008:
Our beauty queen can take down their beauty queen any day of the week!
“the Dark Ages”
Kinda an odd term to use in a thread about someone claiming Palin is the anti-Christ. Part of the reason The Dark Ages were dark was why?
So Phil, I’m confused. Are you now supporting Palin?
What has been the confession of Obama’s mouth?
When he has spoken publicly about salvation, he has said:
That concept of salvation is completely non-Biblical.
That is a Marxist view of “salvation”.
Obama has not publicly confessed “Jesus is Lord”, but he has repeated the Muslim confession of faith, the Shahada, in Arabic with a “perfect accent”.
jsmiddleton #6 – and those same fools that can get those gun permits, drivers licenses and procreate – can also VOTE. Keeps me awake nights just thinking about it.
What I find most sad of all is that no matter what “lamestream” press outlet is on scene, local, regional, or national, they will always give the Liberal/Progressive “losers” like that “huge” band of protesters (what were there 10 or 12?) equal time to spout their drivel on air.
Didn’t several people here say outright that they thought B.H.O. was the AntiChrist?
“That concept of salvation is completely non-Biblical.”
can’t get to “completely non-Biblical”.
There is both a vertical and a horizontal nature to salvation. That does not mean the social gospel preached by the left is Biblical. It also does not mean there is no community aspect to salvation.
Consider the Lord’s Prayer:
Our Father, who art in heaven,
hallowed be thy name.
Thy Kingdom come,
thy will be done,
on earth as it is in heaven
Give us this day our daily bread.
And forgive us our trespasses,
as we forgive those who trespass against us.
And lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from evil.
For thine is the kingdom, the power and the glory. for ever and ever.
I think I know what you are attempting to state Itook…. and I think I agree with what you are trying to say.
While my salvation is between Jesus Christ and myself, I am also not saved in a vacuum.
Looney Leftwing Liberals are calling her “AntiChrist”. But, I didn’t think they believed in God.
The Bible states that the AntiChrist will be in a position of authority. Sarah isn’t in any such position right now.
No, but I have called him the teleprompter Jesus.
Demeaning slander only comes from those who have no position to debate from.
In his blog post about the new Democrat logo at Democrats.org, Tim Kaine said:
Does Tim Kaine know what Harry Truman stood for?
Does Tim Kaine know what Harry Truman thought was not emphasized enough these days?
If Tim Kaine heard someone speak the words of Harry Truman today, Tim Kaine would likely call them a “wing-nut” or “tea-bagger”.
Pay heed to the words of Harry Truman:
I believe that a majority of Democrat voters are Truman Democrats, not Obama/Pelosi/Reid Democrats. And Truman Democrats not only support the Tea Party, they actively participate in it.
I’ve met and talked with many of them.
And they will be voting Republican this November.
The guilty flee when no man pursueth.
We are not saved by our actions. Our actions reflect that we are saved.
Salvation deposes a spirit that distorts God’s purposes and establishes God’s Spirit in us. It is the spirit, God’s or Satan’s, in a person that energizes and shapes man’s activity.
Scripture states that “…he who is joined to the Lord is one Spirit.” We are Christian’s having “Christ in us the hope of glory”. The glory is God’s and it is produced only by Him.
I can not create love. Love is uniquely part of who God is. Only He can produce love and He disires to do so by expressing Himself through those who receive Him into their very being.
Gal 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ, and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me. So the life I now live in the body, I live because of the faithfulness of the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.
I no longer live, it is Christ living in me. That is really good news.
Anti-Christ a woman? How dare Doris Beeler call Mrs Obama the devil. Maybe that sulfur smell Doris has been noticing around West Louisville is radiating from her adult diapers.
On a tangent, I personally reject associations with certain political scalawags, now living, and predictions of the Apocalypse, or Revelations.
Evil as many of them may be, many contemporary Christians are reverting (some say backsliding) toward the views of earlier Catholic churches (Celtic, Assyrian, Coptic, etc.) that voted against inclusion of the Apocalypse of John into the Holy Bible. The votes in the two Synods that incorporated Revelations as the final book accepted into the Bible were close. Revelations squeaked by with a modest majority of votes. Many regarded John of Patmos as a visionary touched by the Holy Spirit, others thought of him as a holy man long past sanity. It doesn’t seem to fit into the New Testament.
As I understand it, many of the world’s Catholic Churches not of the Roman Rite do not include Revelations into their accepted Holy Book.
In my previous rant, I was referring to world leaders and politicians, “evil as they may be.” I re-read the paragraph and it might allude that I think all Christians not believing in the Apocalypse of John as evil. My bad.
Silly Doris Beeler–I’m sure that she believes with all her heart that Sarah Palin is the Antichrist, and that before her, that Dub’ya was the Antichrist too.
But SURELY, Barack Obama falls into some category of and end-time prophesy fulfillment, but which one? How about one of the “two witnesses” in Revelation 11 (and, oh, I guess Joe or his wife could be the other). I’d love to mess with this deranged “four feet good–two feet baaaaaaad” Democrat for a little while, and just see what she “thinks.”
McCarthy was proven right…
“Everyone has the right to their own opinion. But no one has the right to be taken seriously.”
Will Rogers
Next topic please…
Boy, oh boy are these slugs going on the dark side? I guess this bho, mo, team, and the d’s are really, really bent out of shape, the “WE The People” are finally getting out to stop them. Thank You God, our Republic is in Your and those who love You hands!
L
John of Patmos…you mean John the Apostle. probably the closest Apostle to Jesus, who wrote the gospel of John, and the letters of John.
it fits perfectly into the NT, and if you read books like Daniel…fits in real well with the prophecies of the OT.
learn to love it….it sure looks like those days are upon us…
at least there is one less now…
(I really hope this outrages those trolls)
By the way its a “K”. Klingon.
Anti-Christ is more then just one person. It is one of those phrases that refers to a way of thinking or a set of beliefs as well as people and possibly being one person as well.
Broad term that needs its context to know how it is being used.
Nothing about the term that means it can’t be a woman.
I for one wish the left would do more of this stuff. It hurts them more than it helps them.
“John of Patmos…you mean John the Apostle.”
Some say different Johns. John the Apostle wrote book of John. John of Patmos wrote Revelations.
Traditional view is same John.
Tea Party folks have been accused of showing up at rallies with signs that show them being racists, Nazis, and everything inbetween.
Yet it always seems that the anti-Tea Party protestors are the ones with the questionable signs.
*snore* I hope I am not the only one bored with you and Phil going at each other.
Yes, and, he is not. As much as I dislike Obrahma, he is not the anti-christ. I would think christians who voted for him were more “anti-christ” than he…
“with you and Phil going at each other.”
According to Phil he’s the victim and I’m the victimizer.
Just kinda hard to follow Phil when in one thread he bashes Palin and in the next defends her. Sorry if my hoping he’d clarify himself bores you.
God forbid we’d actually try to understand each other’s post around here.
…and someone who always takes the crust off of their toast is known as the “Anti-Crust”
Some scholars argue (as they do) that John of Patmos, John the Apostle, and the Evangelist John are different individuals. John, like Jesus, was a popular name at that time.
Some argue that the literary styles of the Apostle John and John of Patmos are very different, and they would be correct. But, on the other hand, a writers styles can change over time, too.
If you believe that the Apocalypse was written circa 95 a.d., then the two Johns are not the same.
The book is actually Revelation, not Revelations.
OBAMA IS THE ANTI-CHRIST!
HIS FOLLOWERS ARE DEMONS!
Yes, I hate it when my fingers get ahead of me. Its is what John saw. The Revelation. While apocalyptic in format its subject matter is Christ as revealed to John in Heaven as Paul noted.
II Corinthians 12:2 “I know a man…such a man was caught up to the third heaven.”
You know some folks think Paul wrote Revelation? Not a John at all.
why would you think that? and please don’t give me this ‘some scholars think’ some scholars are idiots too.
John was the last living apostle…who better to give the revelation to? and it is SO in line with old testament prophecies…of course it is inspired. oh yes the ‘alternative view’ which has been put forth in the last hundred years or so…please…
Daniel’s king of fierce countenance…is the anti-christ.
so Paul is a liar?
Revelation 1
9I, John, your brother and companion in the suffering and kingdom and patient endurance that are ours in Jesus, was on the island of Patmos because of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus.
“so Paul is a liar?”
Didn’t speak to that. I just know that some folks think Paul wrote Revelation.
where would they get that idea? Paul was dead by the time it was written….and he was never exiled to patmos…
if Paul wrote it, why would he call himself john, and claim he wrote it on patmos?
“Daniel’s king of fierce countenance…is the anti-christ.”
In a particular view of eschatology. Of which there are a couple of main schools of thought. Each with its strengths and weaknesses.
If you think a thing is suspect because of its newness on the scene well that puts dispensational premillenialism, the rapture, tribulation, a literal 1000 year reign by Christ in Jerusalem, etc., in the category of “suspect”.
Clearly its the new kid on the block.
“where would they get that idea?”
The general answer is they compare writing styles and see similar type phrasing, etc., in Paul’s writings and Revelation. As for the details you’ll have to do some digging on your own.
jsmiddleton4,
I am not certain that they have enough intelligence, awarness, and ability to do any of those three: get a driver’s license, a gun permit, or procreate.
You see, I am not certain they have enough brain power, cannot generate enough power and coordination, to even know how to fill out a form for a driver’s license, or a gun permit. They might not even know what a gun or a driver’s license is, even if they crawled into their eye, or down their throat, hit them on the head, ir imbedded themselves in the brain.
Furthermore, they might not even know what an automobile is, what it is for, and how to operate one. Their brain and entire neurological system might not be capable of coordinating all that is required to operate an automobile.
I wonder how they even have enough brain power to walk, talk, or chew.
Regarding pro-creation, how would they even know what goes where and what to do? Do they even have normal, natural interest, attraction, and appetite which makes them interested in sexual reproduction, mating, and all that is involved with it? Can they even feel the physical sensations, pleasure, and emotional fulfillment and joy that is part of a loving, normal sexual encounter?
As far as I can see, the best that one of them might do is dry hump a light post, a telephone pole, a rock at the lake, or a fire plug, and only because their neurologial system and consciousness is less developed than a slug and they have no idea that they are even doing so.
Sarah Palin:
“Miss Underestimated”
I thought Popeye was the anti-Christ, until Mighty Mouse beat his butt, even after Popeye devoured twelve tons of spinach.
It is okay now, for they are best of friends and sometimes they work together to save good people, good mice, and so on, from evil.
Then I realized that, the term “anti-Christ” is explained in the Bible, which clearly states that the anti-Christ was already in the world at the time it was explained back then the Apostles of Jesus the Christ were still around.
The scripture which Christians cite clearly states that anyone who denies that the Christ has come in the flesh, that is the spirit of the anti-Christ, who they heard was to come, and even now, at that time that they spoke and wrote of it, was the anti-Christ already in the world.
Sarah Palin does not deny that the Christ has come in the flesh. She is berated, excoriated, mocked, and abused, charged with believing the “myth,” or “fairy tale,” or whatever detractors toss into the mix, that the Christ has come, in the form of Jesus the Christ. She is belittled for being a Christian. You see, Christians are stupid. You can’t believe in Jesus the Christ unless you are a major league dummy who can’t be trusted to care for children, drive a car, or govern. So goes the criteria of leftist, secularist, atheists, progressives when it comes to right of center Christian influenced/believing conservatives, etc.
A Christian woman, Sarah Palin, taken to task for her belief in Jesus the Christ, who she believes is the Christ who came in the flesh, berated for her belief that Jesus the Christ is her Savior and Lord, hardly makes her the anti-Christ, or an anti-Christ, or anything close.
Of course, those who attack her, Sarah Palin, while denying that the Christ (the Annointed One) has come in the flesh, are actually fitting the definition listed in the Bible for what constitues an anti-Christ.
As far as I can see, the best that one of “them might do is dry hump a light post, a telephone pole, a rock at the lake, or a fire plug, and only because their neurologial system and consciousness is less developed than a slug and they have no idea that they are even doing so.”
Maybe we on the right can gain majorities by attrition?
Nah, he’s a stalker. He has set up shop over at Riehl World View where he is pulling the same crap. He attacked me viciously there a couple of weeks ago got a warning from Dan and then had a comment deleted. He’s completely unhinged.
I didn’t even know he had been banned here until yesterday. What the hell happened last Sunday after I left? I’m afraid to look. The last time I looked, he was calling everyone a-holes.
I guess the 700 Club has taken over the threads here again today. z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z
“I guess the 700 Club has taken over the threads here again today.”
At least your dim view of Christians and the Bible is consistent Phil.
How dare we talk about the anti-Christ in a thread that’s subject matter includes “anti-Christ”.
What were we thinking?
This still your point of view Phil?
“Quoting the Bible is not virtue. It’s a mental crutch in lieu of virtue.”
Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z
Is it boring because it is religious, or because it is historical, Phil?
These two Phil post tell me everything I need to know about anything Phil posts. They are real gems creating a context for understanding Phil. I’ll watch for any other key gems as well. But these two are about all one needs.
“Who is pretending to be objective? I HATE THE GOP!!!”
“Quoting the Bible is not virtue. It’s a mental crutch in lieu of virtue.”
On September 18th, 2010 at 8:38 pm, William said:
Precisely.
Careful now with that mental crutch thing….
That is the case with the phrase anti-Christ. It can be a person. It can be a way of thinking. It can be more than one person.
Its a broad term whose meaning is determined in context of where it is used in Scripture.
It as a term could easily be applied to Islam.
he’s got his mini-me’s stalking me….swede and john deaux are all upset at me because they think I somehow got him banned….I guess they think I used mind control or something….
they’re as nutty as he is….he became unhinged defending his muslim faith…kind of like IMAM OBAMA!!
he was saying some nasty stuff to me…and I went to respond and noticed his post was gone…and so was he…
then swede was advertising his blog on here…which I unethical…using this blog to try to divert traffic to another blog.
oh yeah the MAHDI will raise his wounded head…
the muslims savior..the MAHDI matches up with the person we know as the beast…the anti-christ…
what does the anti-christ do to his opponents?? BEHEADS THEM….sounds familiar doesn’t it? wonder where he gets that idea from…hmmmm….
“boring”
That’s the term Phil uses when someone has called him out on his crap with his own words so he can’t wiggle out of it by crying victim. His m.o. is to use words like “boring” or attacking.
His attacks have only made his m.o. and bias clearer so now he’s gone back to stuff like the “z’s” and boring.
Having worked in Sudan and seen Islam up close and personal, I have no problem believing that the term anti-Christ applies to Islam.
your not the only one trust me. He tries to justify his bickering by saying “God forbid we’d actually try to understand each others post around here.” It’s not a matter of understanding as much as a matter of knowing when to stop.
oh and jsm type your lil fingers to the bone I won’t be reading or replying, I have better things to do, like read a thread you and yours haven’t hi-jacked…yet.
I highly doubt that too many liberals know anything Christ, anti or not. If they did, you would see signs like the one above.
And btw, I cannot wait to see the headlines in all the major newspapers criticizing the “extremist” signs at this protest. *crickets chirping*
What if he’s the beast rat4? Think about it. Have you seen him? I have.
He makes me say things…do things…yes, HE’S THE ANTIPHIL! Sleep well…we’ll be watching.
“I highly doubt that too many liberals know anything Christ”
Really? You really think because someone is a liberal they can’t know anything about Christ?
“mini-me’s stalking me”
Can’t be all that scary if they are mini-me’s hey?
Or maybe you use a smaller font when posting?
“I won’t be reading or replying”
Oh now that really hurts.
“you and yours”
So who are my “yours” right…?
You’re not.
You do know Aloha that when someone takes the time to post as you have they aren’t really all that bored.
…meanwhile D’oh!bamma is nothing more than a demon in a polyester suit shucking and jiving his congregation.
“Anti-Christ” in my opinion, is an institution, not a person.
THAT Democrat Party, the one my parents raised me in, is long gone.
The New Democrat Party is a blend of Marxism, Maoism, neo-liberalism, statism, and atheism.
No longer is there a belief in helping the individual grow, and develop on their own, rather, they believe in dragging the person to the collective, under threat of force, using prevarications, and free use of mischaracterisations.
They no longer believe in individual freedom, but collective harmony, having no tolerance for dissent.
They no longer believe in compassion when needed, but believe once helped, they own the person.
They once believed in helping the individual because it was the right thing to do…not because it would help them collect votes and concentrate power.
They no longer believe in rugged individualism…it is all about collectivism, and the power it gives them.
These are some of the reasons they view Sarah Palin as such a threat. She is a strong believer in self-determination , and individual responsiblity!
In order for the Democrat Party to flourish, those ideas must be discouraged, diminished, and the persons promoting then, demonized, or they are lost.
***
HI RIGHT_ON–#77–I think a lot like you do–but you left out a couple of important liberal beliefs. Add PRO ABORTION, ANTI-AMERICAN, AND PRO THEFT.
***
Nice crew–why wouldn’t everybody trust them?
***
John Bibb
***