Did You Know...

   

Another day, another DOJ/NBPP lie; Plus: How Team Obama scrambled to respond to this little website operator

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  September 20, 2010 11:57 AM

Former DOJ whistleblower J. Christian Adams reports today on the latest revelations of DOJ obstructionism and deception over the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case.

At Pajamas Media, Adams writes:

Judicial Watch made an explosive announcement today about the Justice Department’s stonewalling in the New Black Panther voter intimidation case dismissal. Forced to bring a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit after DOJ rebuffed its public records request (so much for transparency), Judicial Watch obtained a privilege log from the DOJ last week.

It shows — in a rather dramatic way — that the DOJ has been untruthful about who was involved in the dismissal of the case.

In July, I complied with a subpoena and provided testimony to the United States Commission on Civil Rights. I did so in part because inaccurate statements had been made about the case by DOJ officials. Some of these statements falsely claimed that ethical rules mandated the dismissal of the charges against the New Black Panthers. This was nonsense.

But the real whopper? DOJ’s claim — repeated over and over again — that career civil servants were wholly responsible for the spiking of the case.

Today we learn, from the Department’s own records, that this claim is demonstrably false.

The privilege log produced in the FOIA litigation contains stunning entries. They show regular discussions and deliberations between the highest political officials inside the DOJ, including the deputy attorney general and the associate attorney general, about what to do with the case. This contradicts numerous statements made to Congress, the Civil Rights Commission, and to the public.

Some of these statements were under oath.

Mark Tapscott at the Examiner has more details about the privilege log and DOJ e-mail communications obtained by Judicial Watch.

Adams spotlights one interesting little nugget showing how the DOJ scrambled to react to my May 28, 2009 online exclusive that first revealed the shady dismissal of the NBPP case:

The logs show political officials Hirsch and Rosenbaum, and a press spokesperson, swinging into action as soon as the press reported the dismissal on May 28, 2009. “Response to Malkin” shows up on May 28 — they were coordinating a response to Michelle Malkin’s exclusive breaking the story of the outrageous dismissal. These communications are characterized by the log as “pre-decisional,” and therefore protected. Of course, the decision to dismiss the case had already been made. I can’t wait to see what the court does with that in the FOIA litigation. (Though I suppose the decisions about how to cover up the truth of the dismissal were in the formative, pre-decisional process.)

…Today was a very bad day for the Justice Department, but a worse day for our country. The privilege logs show what most Americans suspected all along: that the Department was lying, and the corrupt dismissal of the New Black Panther Case was made high up the political chain of command.

Let’s see if the Department’s defenders in the press and on the Civil Rights Commission keep repeating the lies.

Remember: Sunlight — relentless sunlight — is the best disinfectant. And the ballot box is the ultimate sanitizer.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Go figure: Dems claiming Russia ‘hacked the election’ slam Trump’s vote fraud panel

May 12, 2017 02:40 PM by Doug Powers

This is getting confusing

Chuck Schumer seemed to be for firing Comey before he was against it

May 9, 2017 05:45 PM by Doug Powers

Everybody report to your respective safe spaces!

Media: Hey, Team Hillary might have broken laws fewer times than Comey said

May 9, 2017 10:32 AM by Doug Powers

Vindication is in the eye of the beholder

It’s a mystery! Comey: Huma Abedin ‘somehow’ forwarded classified emails to Anthony Weiner

May 3, 2017 04:36 PM by Doug Powers

Here’s why the protected class got another pass

Muddy Maxine Waters: What a riot

April 26, 2017 07:33 AM by Michelle Malkin


Categories: Corruption, Democrats, Feature Story, Race Hustlers, Race relations

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook