Did You Know...


Union members speak up on coerced political spending

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 12, 2010 11:02 AM

I’ve been writing about the rank-and-file union member revolt against forced political spending and power grab schemes taking place under the radar screen across the country.

More are saying enough is enough.

Illinois Review interviewed a Chicago SEIU member over the weekend fed up with his labor bosses ignoring him:

In Ohio, a teachers’ union member stands up against her union — which is usurping her union dues to campaign against her own husband, a Republican candidate for the state house of representatives:

I’m Jade Thompson and my husband, Andy Thompson, is running for the Ohio House of Representatives. I am a teacher at Marietta High School. Imagine my chagrin when my friends and colleagues began showing me the awful attack ads against my husband which they had received in the mail. Now imagine my dismay when I saw that those defamatory mailers were paid for by the Ohio Education Association – my teachers’ union. In effect, they are using my union dues to attack my husband! This is a new low, even for the OEA.

There was a recent letter to the editor about AEP withdrawing its support from the Ohio Chamber of Commerce because the chamber made a political endorsement. The writer found it “inappropriate and shameful” for that organization to ignore its members. I wonder if she would say the same for the OEA, an organization that endorses the most liberal candidates in the field and which month after month promotes progressive causes and programs in its member newsletter. Are Ohio’s teachers that unanimously liberal or does our union simply not represent our views at all? If teachers are representative of the larger voting public then you would expect that our political views would be just as diverse.

Teachers should be free to spend their hard-earned dollars to contribute to the candidates and causes they actually support. The OEA and its parent organization, the NEA, refuse to acquiesce because they have an obvious agenda. After all, as the general counsel for the NEA once said in federal court, “if you take away payroll deduction, you won’t collect a penny from these people, and it has nothing to do with voluntary or involuntary. I think it has to do with the nature of the beast, and the beasts who are our teachers … (They) simply don’t come up with the money regardless of the purpose.” Teachers, this is what your union thinks of you.

Andy will support a paycheck protection law that prevents teachers’ union dues from being used for political propaganda without written permission. The Ohio legislature passed this legislation twice before but the previously liberal Ohio Supreme Court overturned the will of the people. I am hopeful that Andy and a newly elected Conservative majority in the Ohio House can protect the rights of teachers in this state to keep their money from funding the political agenda of any organization without their approval.

Jade Thompson

Thank you for speaking out. Know your rights — and stay safe out there.


Related from Gateway Pundit: It Begins. Federal Employees Union Releases Series of Offensive “Teabagger” Election Ads (Video)

Posted in: Politics,SEIU,Unions

Surrendering to SPLC’s Lazy Media Lemmings

October 9, 2019 07:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

ADL, Antifa and Koch: Toxic Anti-Trump League

October 2, 2019 08:27 AM by Michelle Malkin

7 Dem Debate Questions Jorge Ramos Won’t Ask

September 11, 2019 07:27 AM by Michelle Malkin

NYC’s Anti-Cop Anarchy: What Say You, Dante de Blasio?

July 24, 2019 06:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

Epstein, Bean & Buck: The Democratic Donors’ Sex-Creep Club

July 10, 2019 09:59 AM by Michelle Malkin

Categories: Politics