Is Barney Frank Sending His Boyfriend Out to Heckle Sean Bielat?

By Doug Powers  •  October 17, 2010 08:59 AM

**Written by Doug Powers

Sean Bielat has momentum in his quest to unseat Barney Frank, and Frank’s team must be feeling the heat, because they’re resorting to desperate tactics not unlike the foundering golfer who hired a guy to yell “jackass!” during Happy Gilmore’s backswing.

It looks as if Barney’s got his boyfriend, James Ready, heckling Bielat.

From Fleming and Hayes:

Upon exiting the most recent debate with Barney Frank, located at WGBH studios in Boston, MA, Republican Congressional candidate, Sean Bielat, gets heckled by a Barney Frank “supporter” while talking to the media. While watching this video, we realized that we recognized this “supporter”. We received confirmation from two eyewitnesses that the mysterious cameraman was none other than Barney Frank’s pot-growing boyfriend, James Ready.

As Bielat’s talking to reporters, off camera you can hear a man who never fully puts down the camera to reveal himself say “quit the jokes, dude, you’re not funny at all.”

Here’s video of the exhange:

Imagine the outrage from Camp Barney if Bielat had his wife following Frank around and heckling him during chats with reporters.

This kind of thing makes the Frank campaign look especially classless and desperate — good news if you’d rather have Barney unable to waste billions of taxpayer dollars and instead spend his days arguing over saving a dollar of his own.

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Politicians,Politics

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On October 17th, 2010 at 9:00 am, tarpon said:

    This is just funny …

  2. #2
    On October 17th, 2010 at 9:17 am, Wade said:

    Dirt bag

  3. #3
    On October 17th, 2010 at 9:31 am, Marc said:

    Ah, the new BFF is not as dignified as Steven Gobie!

  4. #4
    On October 17th, 2010 at 9:37 am, cabrerski said:

    “We are Democrats…we rule by divine right – not the God kind of divine right, more of the Mother Earth kind of divine right.
    “Anyone who tries to take our power away from us is mean-spirited, racist, xenophobic, homophobic, hates children or kills kittens for fun.
    “And if you take Congress away from us, we are going to pout, scream and hold our breath until we turn blue.
    “How can you recognize us? We are calm, collected and always abide by the rules…

  5. #5
    On October 17th, 2010 at 9:55 am, yohannbiimu said:

    There’s probably not much that is different, essentially, between Sean Bielat and Barney Frank (he’s probably as much of a big-spender as Frank is); however, it’s important to get this self-serving crook out of “public service,” and hopefully into prison stripes. There needs to be investigations into all of the graft and abuse of power which we have all suffered beneath the robbers and tyrants in our government.

  6. #6
    On October 17th, 2010 at 9:56 am, happyscrapper said:

    There is no doubt that they have nothing!! All you hear now in their campaigning is heckeling, insults, talking points. I just heard Bill Clinton tell an audience the other day…You MUST

  7. #7
    On October 17th, 2010 at 9:57 am, zorro said:

    low-life pot-head democrats… what should we expect from them? Manners? That would be wishful thinking.

  8. #8
    On October 17th, 2010 at 9:58 am, happyscrapper said:

    ooops…pushed the send button by mistake…!

    You MUST vote for Sestak! You MUST! That was it. We MUST! I wonder what he plans to do when we DON’T!

    The desparation is so obvious. I am looking forward to watching the Sunday talk shows today. It is getting to be very entertaining watching them squirm.

  9. #9
    On October 17th, 2010 at 9:58 am, RedDog said:

    This kind of thing makes the Frank campaign look especially classless and desperate — good news if you’d rather have Barney unable to waste billions of taxpayer dollars and instead spend his days arguing over saving a dollar of his own.

    No, actally Doug, Barney did not waste billions of taxpayer dollars. Barney Frank stole and destroyed trillions of taxpayer savings and investment wealth. Upwards of $10 trillion in real estate value disappeared as a direct and planned result of Democrat Marxist policy.

    Since, by definition, political crooks like Frank are insulated from prosecution, the only way to get him behind bars is to demonstrate that he profited from his actions. That is why a thorough post-mortem on the financial system failure, congressional hearings, and grand jury investigations are critical and necessary to reassert the rule of law and confidence in government.

  10. #10
    On October 17th, 2010 at 10:00 am, thejim said:

    The only question now is: Will it be enough to send Barney packing? It’s difficult to trust the MA voters to do the obviously correct thing. They fail far too often.

  11. #11
    On October 17th, 2010 at 10:02 am, happyscrapper said:

    Hey folks…a gift from God!! Guest on Meet the Press this a.m….wait for it…Robert Gibbs! I can’t wait! What a doofus. Lots of laughter in store!

  12. #12
    On October 17th, 2010 at 10:05 am, Patronedheart said:

    Wonder if James Ready is heckling Bawney Fwank to go to the Sizzler after this.

  13. #13
    On October 17th, 2010 at 10:25 am, happyscrapper said:

    What really disturbs me is…will there be justice?? Will the crooks in DC, like Barney Frank, be investigated…ever??? It seems as if they continue to get away with horrendous crimes, year after year. Then, one is prosecuted, after years of stalling, and people seem to be satisfied with that. There are dozens, maybe even hundreds of crooks that need to be prosecuted. Will it happen? Or will they live out their lives in comfort on the money stolen from We The People? I find this infuriating!!

    By the way…Robert Gibbs spend his interview on Meet the Depressed talking out of his arse again. He said the Republicans are the party of “no”, just because they didn’t follow lock step with Obama in passing the socialist/marxist laws that were being rammed down our throats. O.K. Maybe not in those exact words, but that’s what he meant.

  14. #14
    On October 17th, 2010 at 10:50 am, jdtruly said:

    We need to send them all a copy of Whoopi Goldberg’s new book on “Civility”

  15. #15
    On October 17th, 2010 at 10:50 am, Lindsay said:

    Barney and Co. think they are in Chicago where this is the norm. Hey Barney, he’s a charmer…what happened to Herb, your “spouse,” and Fannie Mae?
    http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/03/who_is_barney_frank.html

    After a U.S. Congressman (Barney Fwank) paid for a gay prostitute in 1989, he is still up for re-election, Massachusetts? Please vote this creep out of office.

  16. #16
    On October 17th, 2010 at 11:19 am, BadIdeaGuy said:

    This is my only exposure to Bielat, but he seems confident and composed. And he made Barney’s frank-supporter look foolish (which probably isn’t that difficult).

  17. #17
    On October 17th, 2010 at 11:31 am, rambler said:

    Desperate times call for desperate measures. The no-new-ideas-incumbents to the rescue by implementing more stunningly poor ideas. Hey, MA voters, do you see how inept Barney is now??? See what one party rule does. It makes it easier for the stupid to get reelected. And I hope you remember about John Kerry’s boat when he is up for reelection. The country deserves better.

  18. #18
    On October 17th, 2010 at 11:43 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Did anyone watch Fiorina on Fox this morning? Can you honestly tell me that you would vote for that ditzy airhead? Think Boxer only much younger. She came right out and boasted about being a “gangs of McCain” member. She feels deeply indebted to McCain. And Chris Wallace could not get her to provide a single example of how she would change anything. It’s all about “bipartisanship”. She is just a liberal inkblot who hides behind empty rhetoric.

    As bad as it sounds for people who don’t live here, the election of Fiorina and Whitman is not only not a step in the right direction for CA, it is a step backwards in that it demonstrates that the corrupt establishment can easily defend its power by securing the big states while keeping the little people entertained with possible victories in AK, DE, and MA. That is why I am voting 3rd party. This should have been a great year for CA but the national GOP knocked us out before the game even started.

    And what is it with McPalin and her constant pleas for “party unity”? Behind all of the “mamma grizzly” posturing and rhetoric, she is no different from McCain/Bush. Like McCain, she throws people under the bus (AZ, CA) while calling for party unity. Like Bush, she gladly suffers the Democratic “derangement syndrome” but seems adamant in fostering bipartisanship. Remember the pictures of Bush hugging Kennedy? Are many of you sleepwalking into yet another grand GOP deception?

    Where are the calls for border security for instance? And how long did “repeal Obamacare” last? We better be ready to kick ass on November 3 because re-instating the same unrepentant GOP scumbags who were calling us “extremists”, “bigots”, “xenophobes”, “purists” and other vile names is not victory. We will soon find ourselves targeted again by the same people using the same vile insults and arguments.

  19. #19
    On October 17th, 2010 at 11:51 am, Wade said:

    #19 and what does your diatribe have to do with this thread?

  20. #20
    On October 17th, 2010 at 12:10 pm, Dimsdale said:

    Time to retire Barney to Fire Island, once and for all.

    I only wish I were in his district, but they would probably have gerrymandered me out of it regardless.

  21. #21
    On October 17th, 2010 at 12:11 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    #20: We are wasting our time “winning small” while “losing big”. McCain is winning the big states with his candidates while McPalin is engaging the national dialogue with AK, DE, MA, and other small states. You may not like it, but it’s relevant.

  22. #22
    On October 17th, 2010 at 12:26 pm, txvet2 said:

    How on Earth could anything make Barney Fwank look more classless than he already is?

  23. #23
    On October 17th, 2010 at 12:26 pm, txvet2 said:

    On October 17th, 2010 at 12:11 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    It’s Sunday Phil. Give it a rest.

  24. #24
    On October 17th, 2010 at 12:30 pm, Roland said:

    Phil,

    If we win the Senate races in the little states, and the RINO’s and Democrats split the big states, then we win the Senate by a landslide.

    I’m voting for Fiorina.

    1) Boxer is despicable. The thought of giving that toad another six years should make you violently ill.
    2) For every vote Fiorina loses because she tells Californians she’ll work with the Democrats to ‘improve’ things, she gains two votes from the squishy center.
    3) Your myth of a conservative California is ridiculous. Fiorina is the best we are ever going to get with this voter base.

    I can understand a conservative not wanting to vote for her since it gives the RINO’s more control over the Republican Caucus in the Senate. In her case I do not think that is a strong enough argument.

    However, that argument does not exist with regard to Whitman. Your failure to vote to stop Jerry Brown is mindboggling.

    You’re going to give Governor Moonbeam four more years of appointing California Supreme Court Justices?

    Are you completely out of your mind?

  25. #25
    On October 17th, 2010 at 12:43 pm, bjc said:

    Barney Frank’s pot-growing boyfriend, James Ready.

    *Inquiring minds want to know: If Barney Frank is so smart, why didn’t he siphon off some of that stimulus money that went to African men to show them how to wash their private parts and use same for his BFF?; Risky risky behavior begets aids, aids, aids!

  26. #26
    On October 17th, 2010 at 12:43 pm, Roland said:

    If you had to pick one person who was the most responsible for the bubble and the ensuing economic difficulties (prior to Obama’s threat to become President with an overwhelming Democrat Congress, which made the difficulties finally morph into a full blown disaster), that one person would be Barney Frank.

    On Nov 2, there really are people who will go into the voting booth and vote for that destructive clown.

    Amazing.

  27. #27
    On October 17th, 2010 at 12:52 pm, greenfairie said:

    Right. Boxer is more than an arrogant, corrupt, despicable, incompetent flea brain socialist. She is a TRAITOR. She’s the one who, along with other treasonous Communist/socialists in Congress, gave Code Pink diplomatic clearance to go to Iraq and give the terrorists killing OUR soldiers $600,000. The woman shouldn’t be in Congress, she should be rotting in prison. Fiorina is not going to be another Jim DeMint but at least she is not a traitor. We cannot afford to keep putting overtly anti-American politicians into position of power anymore.

    And Jerry Brown? Good God, sir. Do you not remember what the man did to this state in the ’70s-early ’80s? I’ve got two words for ya…ROSE BIRD.

  28. #28
    On October 17th, 2010 at 12:53 pm, rightisright said:

    Will the crooks in DC, like Barney Frank, be investigated…ever??? It seems as if they continue to get away with horrendous crimes, year after year.

    Exactly right question to be answered by the new congress, if the change takes place that is. The leaders of the Republican Party in the new congress will tell just how serious this re-birthed party is about cleaning up Congress for the American people.

    Oh and Barney Frank is a thief, he may be the biggest thief in history yet, along with Dodd of course.

  29. #29
    On October 17th, 2010 at 12:53 pm, greenfairie said:

    Back on topic…somebody needs to tell Bwaney’s house boy to get off his lazy stoned @$$ and get a real job. We’re not going to support his sugar daddy anymore.

  30. #30
    On October 17th, 2010 at 1:00 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Dodd and Frank designed the disaster.

    Dodd quit rather than be thrown out.

    I’m praying that Frank gets tossed.

    Please MA, do the right thing for the rest of the country!

  31. #31
    On October 17th, 2010 at 1:04 pm, rightisright said:

    What the hay happened to the original 13 colonies? Most are filled with the KING’s subjects now days.

  32. #32
    On October 17th, 2010 at 1:12 pm, Mister P said:

    #19 and what does your diatribe have to do with this thread?

    He should start his own blog, rather than continually hijack Michelle’s.

  33. #33
    On October 17th, 2010 at 1:14 pm, ctmom said:

    ew.

  34. #34
    On October 17th, 2010 at 1:19 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Roland, I won’t criticize you for voting the way you want. Just remember that November merely marks the Republican victory and that victory will be dominated by McCain and his cronies. The conservative victory starts on November 3. If we all succumb to calls for party unity and give the “gangs of McCain” another chance to redeem themselves, we lost already. And we would deserve it.

    If you see a difference between CA going bankrupt with Whitman driving the bus rather than Brown, I don’t know what to say. And if you really believe Fiorina is an improvement over Boxer, are you not paying attention?

    The only reason McCain is laying low is because he won his states before this campaign season even started when Palin conceded AZ and CA in exchange for being allowed to star in a grand effort to win (maybe) a few small states. The establishment Republicans are in the catbird seat unless the new “conservative” wave challenges that leadership as their very first move. My bet is that they won’t and people like me will be excoriated daily here and elsewhere for being impatient “purists”. We’ve heard it all before. “Perfection is the enemy of the good” etc..

  35. #35
    On October 17th, 2010 at 2:12 pm, Roland said:

    If you see a difference between CA going bankrupt with Whitman driving the bus rather than Brown, I don’t know what to say.

    1) Whitman will get more concessions from the public employee unions than Brown would. Anything will be more than Brown will get. Brown will be throwing more money at the unions for the unions to then give him more money.

    2) Court appointments.

    3) You always underestimate the amount of damage these elected executives do by squashing conservatives (any resistance to marxism) within the bureaucracies and making the bureaucracies ever more marxist. Witness what has been going on in the DOJ, just for one small example.

    And if you really believe Fiorina is an improvement over Boxer, are you not paying attention?

    Ahmadinejad would be an improvement over Boxer (with only the slightest exaggeration). Haven’t you been paying attention?

    My bet is that they won’t and people like me will be excoriated daily here and elsewhere for being impatient “purists”. We’ve heard it all before. “Perfection is the enemy of the good” etc..

    You certainly will get attacked for being a purist by some here, and the quote there at the end is quite true.

    It’s always a question of balance and common sense. The good wouldn’t be the good if it prevents us doing better without taking on unreasonable risk.

  36. #36
    On October 17th, 2010 at 2:28 pm, love2rumba said:

    The bottom line as I see it, is that if these wonderful McCainian moderates lose like Whitman and Fiorina, it will call in to question the notion that only moderates can win when they have lost, and it will give Tea Partyers more ammunition for their side long-run.

    As for Queen Sarah, you have to admit she runs a pretty good game on TV, but then so does Newt gingrich, and look where he’s gone…

  37. #37
    On October 17th, 2010 at 2:38 pm, Roland said:

    On October 17th, 2010 at 2:28 pm, love2rumba said:

    Unfortunately, your takeaway would be incorrect. Their defeat will be seen as Democrat strength, further encouraging the GOP “leadership” to move further to the left.

    I am 100% certain about this. The leadership of both parties consider the Tea Party here to have been crushed by the defeats of DeVore and Poizner. A defeat of Fiorina and Whitman will clearly show the leadership those candidates just weren’t far enough to the left for the average CA voter.

    Think about it. Losing to Boxer and Governor Moonbeam???

    In the strategic thinking of politicos, that screams that the CA GOP should be running candidates like Campbell, not DeVore.

  38. #38
    On October 17th, 2010 at 3:30 pm, NeoFan said:

    Poor Phil. No offense dude but you sound like one of those parents that think they can change the public schools by joining the PTA.

    California is going down. Most of your neighbors disagree with you and will continue to do so until unemployment there reaches 97.9 percent. That is as long as crime rises with it.

    Do the right thing and move to a better state. Join us to block the coming bailout of California and New York. And for gosh sakes take your kids out of public school and teach them the truth. :)

  39. #39
    On October 17th, 2010 at 4:18 pm, wren said:

    Rep. Barney Frank sure picks a colorful selection of boyfriends.

    Let’s not forget about Rep. Frank’s relationship with Stephen Gobie in the late 1980′s.

    Back in 1985, Frank had engaged the services of a male escort named Stephen Gobie, who had advertised his “hot bottom” in a personal ad. Over the next two years, while Frank was trying to decide whether to come out, he and Gobie carried on a clandestine affair, during which time Frank hired Gobie as a driver despite knowing Gobie was on probation for drug possession and for possession of child pornography. Frank used his House privileges to fix Gobie’s parking tickets. He wrote a memo trying to clear Gobie from probation that was disingenuous at best and an outright deception at worst. Gobie repaid Frank by running a prostitution service out of Frank’s Capitol Hill apartment. When Frank discovered this, he fired Gobie and ended their relationship. Then, in 1989, just two years after Frank’s announcement that he was gay, Gobie told his story to the conservative Washington Times.
    http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2005/10/02/to_be_frank/

    Good people of Massachusetts, WHY do you keep electing Barney Frank to represent you? It is time to end the embarrassment!

    Vote Barney Frank OUT OF OFFICE!

  40. #40
    On October 17th, 2010 at 4:22 pm, Truesoldier said:

    LOL…I guess we know who is the “man” in barney’s relationship now.

  41. #41
    On October 17th, 2010 at 4:23 pm, shimauma2 said:

    No, I totallay get Phil. Living in AZ as I do, I was utterly pissed that palin gave mccrumb her endorsement, but all around, real Conservatives backed by local Tea Parties are ahead LOCAL positions. As a far as I’m concerned it’s these small LOCAL positions that are going to give the moderate/libtard politicians *hell* in the next two years and hopefully these small LOCAL positions will give REAL conservatives the foot up they need to take the bigger offices when leftards like mccrumb are finally shoved out.

  42. #42
    On October 17th, 2010 at 4:51 pm, love2rumba said:

    Roland said:

    I agree with you that tha Establishment Republicrats will think that way, but then these poeple are so out-of-touch in the first place, that they mimick insanity. The real thoughts that I am concerend with are that of the voters, in which case, the idea of a Tea Party movement are favored within one of the two parties.

    The Repubs will win no doubt in 2010,,,but if they don’t perform the necessary deep spending cuts and elimination of government programs to control Federal Spending, and show they have a good grasp of Free-Market economics that are vital for the country, they will be gone. When the view of the average voter becomes that neither the Dems or Repubs have what’s best for the country,the opportunity for a powerful third party option-not movement- will open up as it has never doen so before.

  43. #43
    On October 17th, 2010 at 4:56 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    It’s MA. Frank wins.

    If for no other reason to vote Boxer out, I chose: It’s not a baby until you bring it home from the hospital.

  44. #44
    On October 17th, 2010 at 5:01 pm, Roland said:

    The Repubs will win no doubt in 2010,,,but if they don’t perform the necessary deep spending cuts and elimination of government programs to control Federal Spending, and show they have a good grasp of Free-Market economics that are vital for the country, they will be gone.

    That will be how the Democrats will be playing it for the next two years, even as they are vetoing legislation and trashing the Republican House for any attempts to cut off funding to anything at all.

    The Republicans will probably gain ‘control’ of the House, and there is a chance they could get ‘control’ of the Senate, but in both cases their ability to actually accomplish anything with that control (other than to block further insanity) will be practically nonexistent, and their majorities will not be strong enough for the leadership to be able to dependably corral enough votes for anything taking real political courage.

    My point is that if the people are expecting the Republicans to actually accomplish anything for the next two years, they are going to be badly disappointed.

    That is what the Democrats are counting on …. the continued idiocy of the American electorage.

    You can’t fix stupid. So I’m inclined to think the Democrats will be right. I hope not, but I don’t see any reason for thinking the people understand just how little they are going to get for the next two years.

  45. #45
    On October 17th, 2010 at 5:27 pm, revolution said:

    Barney and his cupcake are two pigs in a blanket.

  46. #46
    On October 17th, 2010 at 6:01 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The Boston Globe reports that Frank was on the front porch and told police that he never saw the plants and would not have recognized them.

    Funny, he never knew there was a brothel in his basement.

    Unqualified home buyers were not the only ones who benefitted from Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank’s efforts to deregulate Fannie Mae throughout the 1990s.

    So did Frank’s partner, a Fannie Mae executive at the forefront of the agency’s push to relax lending restrictions.

    Now that Fannie Mae is at the epicenter of a financial meltdown that threatens the U.S. economy, some are raising new questions about Frank’s relationship with Herb Moses, who was Fannie’s assistant director for product initiatives. Moses worked at the government-sponsored enterprise from 1991 to 1998, while Frank was on the House Banking Committee, which had jurisdiction over Fannie.

    Both Frank and Moses assured the Wall Street Journal in 1992 that they took pains to avoid any conflicts of interest. Critics, however, remain skeptical.

    “It’s absolutely a conflict,” said Dan Gainor, vice president of the Business & Media Institute. “He was voting on Fannie Mae at a time when he was involved with a Fannie Mae executive. How is that not germane?

    “If this had been his ex-wife and he was Republican, I would bet every penny I have – or at least what’s not in the stock market
    - that this would be considered germane,” added Gainor, a T. Boone Pickens Fellow. “But everybody wants to avoid it because he’s gay. It’s the quintessential double standard.”

    Looks like Barney’s switched from Herb to herbs.

    Still clueless though.

  47. #47
    On October 17th, 2010 at 6:37 pm, Buy Danish said:

    Guffaw – from the link to his BFF, James Ready, after he was busted in Maine for having pot plants:

    I told him that our relationship could not develop if he could not promise me that he would not repeat this. He apologized, with great sincerity I believe, and he made that promise and has lived up to it.

    Is this what he told the boyfriend who was busted for running a prostitution biz out of their Capitol Hill apt?

  48. #48
    On October 17th, 2010 at 7:04 pm, love2rumba said:

    Roland said: My point is that if the people are expecting the Republicans to actually accomplish anything for the next two years, they are going to be badly disappointed.

    Agreed. I should have prefaced my statement in better context. That is my fault. I do not believe in the slightest that the Repubs at current have the power to enforce budget cuts on their own;I also do not believe that Obama is going to pull a Bill Clinton and work with them either. I expect gridlock for the next two years.

    What I was trying to say is that if those that have been trusted as representative of the Tea Party spirit backslide while have this opportunity start ‘reaching across the aisle’, they are finished;on the other hand, if there are any McCainian sentiments amongst the Establishment GOP, and the Tea Party candidates do fight them once elected, then two years of gridlock will have benefits.

    The nagging question is that this means two additional years of not doing the deep-spending cuts needed to avoid National Default or Hyperinflation, what do we do then?

  49. #49
    On October 17th, 2010 at 8:53 pm, sbw999 said:

    This whole story is somewhat skin crawly.

  50. #50
    On October 17th, 2010 at 11:49 pm, Roland said:

    … What I was trying to say is that if those that have been trusted as representative of the Tea Party spirit backslide while have this opportunity start ‘reaching across the aisle’, they are finished ….

    Very true. And the pressure on them from the media to do that will be intense. I hope they’re ready for it.

  51. #51
    On October 18th, 2010 at 5:26 am, tbear44 said:

    On October 17th, 2010 at 4:18 pm, wren said:

    Good people of Massachusetts, WHY do you keep electing Barney Frank to represent you? It is time to end the embarrassment!

    Vote Barney Frank OUT OF OFFICE!

    I know it’s MA but why in God’s name would anyone vote for this creep?

  52. #52
    On October 18th, 2010 at 9:16 am, yohannbiimu said:

    On October 18th, 2010 at 5:26 am, tbear44 said:

    On October 17th, 2010 at 4:18 pm, wren said:
    Good people of Massachusetts, WHY do you keep electing Barney Frank to represent you? It is time to end the embarrassment!
    Vote Barney Frank OUT OF OFFICE!

    I know it’s MA but why in God’s name would anyone vote for this creep?

    It’s simple, really. Barney Frank is TYPICAL of the sort of person who holds public office throughout the world. He says what itching ears all of the globe love to hear when they consider who to vote for. That is why “leaders” everywhere are either thieves, tyrants, or both.

  53. #53
    On October 18th, 2010 at 12:04 pm, SpeakEasy said:

    Barney sends his husband out to fight his battles. Poor little thing.

  54. #54
    On October 18th, 2010 at 12:15 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Did Barney’s top half heckling Bielat make any of the media in the Peoples Republic?

  55. #55
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:39 pm, cheapseat said:

    Yo P Phil; IS THERE ANY ONE FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT YOU WOULD ENDORSE OR VOTE FOR? YOU SOUND LIKE THE PROVERBIAL MOVIE CRITIC WHO ONLY LIKES FORIEGN FILMS WITH SUBTITLES. YOU KNOW THE GUY WHO PANNED ET AS SOPPY CRAP FROM A CRAPPY PRODUCER NAMED SPIELBERG.

  56. #56
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:31 pm, Kevin from Ohio in Virginia said:

    “Are you with Barney?”

    “No!”

    I wouldn’t admit it either, pal.

  57. #57
    On October 18th, 2010 at 6:19 pm, spaceycakes said:

    LoL

    did one escape from Les Cage aux Folles?

    Nevermind; I take that back. Neither Frank nor this one dress well enough.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook