Open-borders extremist Raul Grijalva running scared

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 18, 2010 02:47 PM

On Sept. 27, I endorsed GOP challenger Ruth McClung in the AZ-07 congressional race and urged you to show your support. You’ve watched and helped her candidacy gain rapid momentum over the last several weeks. She raised $100k in a single day thanks to last week’s grass-roots money bomb. Full disclosure: I contributed $100 to the effort.

Now, open-borders incumbent Raul Grijalva is screaming “RAAAAADICAL” and the DCCC is trying to ride to his rescue by attacking her as fiscally irresponsible:

National Democrats are coming to the defense of Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.).

Grijalva has recently been putting up some weak poll numbers in a heavily Democratic district and is under fire from conservative groups over his call for a boycott of Arizona.

To help save the party from an embarrassing defeat, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee went up on the air with a TV ad targeting Grijalva’s opponent, Republican Ruth McClung.

The ad hits McClung for supporting a “new national sales tax” and “tax breaks for corporation shipping jobs overseas.”

McClung’s response here. Quite rich for the auto bailout-supporting, pro-porkulus, Obamacare-peddling Grijalva to worry about fiscal sanity now.

FYI: Grijalva is just one of several vulnerable Arizona Democrats.

Keep working for an Election Day clean sweep.

Remember: The ballot box is the ultimate sanitizer!

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Immigration,Politics

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On October 18th, 2010 at 2:57 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Now, open-borders incumbent Raul Grijalva is screaming “RAAAAADICAL” and the DCCC is trying to ride to his rescue by attacking her as fiscally irresponsible:

    You mean like Wilma Flintstone and Betty Rubble taking the credit card and yelling “Charge it!”

  2. #2
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:02 pm, tarpon said:

    Maybe some money bombed her way would help???

    I sent mine, as meager as it is, every little bit helps.

  3. #3
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:05 pm, letget said:

    I will do what I can to help with some cash. There are so many r’s who need and should get elected, funds don’t go very far to help them all. ANY person who is for open borders needs to get the boot!
    L

  4. #4
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:16 pm, rocketman said:

    ***
    Let’s hope Rocket Scientist Ruth McKlung can wire a RATO booster to Grijalva’s rear end and launch him into Funemployment.
    ***
    Or point him South and send him back to his beloved Mejixo. He seems to like their way of doing things.
    ***
    Enjoy your trip, Raul. Give Don Presidente our best–as you represent ILLEGAL ALIENS better than you “represent” American Citizens. Hasta la Vista, payaso–Terminator Style.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  5. #5
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:23 pm, RedDog said:

    Ai carumba, my “dirty gringo hands off Atzlan” schtick is not working! What to do? Hey Barack, you are the Great Entertainer, give me some of that shuck and jive for the peoples. Maybe Mitch can shake her junk for the proletariat comrades too.

  6. #6
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:27 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Calling for a boycott of businesses in your own state and congressional district is, as every one knows, fiscally responsible.

    It’s logic like that makes the Stupid Party look like geniuses.

  7. #7
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:27 pm, RedDog said:

    Now, open-borders incumbent Raul Grijalva is screaming “RAAAAADICAL” and the DCCC is trying to ride to his rescue by attacking her as fiscally irresponsible:

    Somebody please tell me what is more fiscally irresponsible than a marxist like Grijalva? You steal other peoples money then use it to pay off your cronies. This guy should be stripped of citizenship and returned to Mexico.

  8. #8
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:32 pm, Ty85719 said:

    These people are a broken record – they simply cannot escape their talking points.

    More porkulus money was sent overseas than was spent in our own borders!

    McClung has a great opportunity to make a final blow to Grijalva…completely cut the legs out from under him. Let’s just hope she takes that opportunity.

  9. #9
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:35 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Mexico’s Ambassador to Arizona’s 7th Congressional District, Raul Grijalva, needs to be sent packing.

    Keep the support coming if you can.

  10. #10
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:35 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    I really don’t understand why this issue is so hard. Seriously build a fence. Like Hadrian’s Wall, The Great Wall, the DMZ in Korea. We should be able to stop people from crossing the border illegally. Until they stop crossings (not increase deportations because you deport them and they come back 4 or 5 times increasing deportations for one illegal), this problem won’t be solved.

    The sad thing is that this is actually an easy problem for the federal government to solve. There are hard problems, but this one should be simple.

    Oh and if we’re giving away money, I’ll take some.

  11. #11
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:37 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    But she says she does not support the Fair Tax, a proposed 23 percent national sales tax that would replace all income taxes.

    Too bad. Repealing the 16th amendment and passing the FairTax would be the best thing for the economy. Don’t forget:

    A heavy or progressive or graduated income tax is necessary for the proper development of Communism.

    - Karl Marx

    If you want freedom instead of communism/socialism, why would you have a taxing structure that makes it easy to destroy freedom and institute socialism?

    But I’ll take a flat tax, too. Anything that will lead to the long overdue death of the class warfare based income tax will work for me.

  12. #12
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:44 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    I really don’t understand why this issue is so hard. Seriously build a fence. Like Hadrian’s Wall, The Great Wall, the DMZ in Korea. We should be able to stop people from crossing the border illegally. Until they stop crossings (not increase deportations because you deport them and they come back 4 or 5 times increasing deportations for one illegal), this problem won’t be solved.

    The sad thing is that this is actually an easy problem for the federal government to solve. There are hard problems, but this one should be simple.

    Actually, it is easy. Any company that is found with illegal aliens in it’s employ should have the CEO, President, Owner, whatever, sent to jail. 6 months should do. No business contact for those 6 months. That means the company is without it’s leader.

    As soon as the head of the company gets out of jail, you can bet the first thing the CEO will do is to fire the person that hired the illegals. You only have to do that to a few companies. The other’s will get the message real quick. Once the jobs dry up, the illegals will deport themselves.

    It won’t happen because the RINOs want the cheap labor, the socialists want the votes, and the unions want membership dues.

  13. #13
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:46 pm, wren said:

    The 9/30 quarterly financial reports were just posted on the FEC.gov website on 10/15.

    According to http://www.fec.gov/DisclosureSearch/HSRefreshCandList.do?category=disH&stateName=AZ&congressId=07&election_yr=2010 Ruth McClung has a significantly lower amount of cash on hand than her opponent.

    As of 9/30

    Ruth McClung had Cash on Hand = $29,939

    Rep. Raul Grijalva had Cash on Hand = $231,416

    Vote Rep. Grijalva OUT OF OFFICE!

  14. #14
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:49 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    Any company that is found with illegal aliens in it’s employ should have the CEO, President, Owner, whatever, sent to jail. 6 months should do. No business contact for those 6 months.

    That’s the answer right there! Put American citizens who pay taxes in jail! woohoo! That’s good government in a free society. A non-taxpayer breaks the law? who cares? let them go. they only want a better life.

    it’s those evil American tax payers that are the problem. Yeah, send them to jail and force them to pay for the schools and hospitals and police for the illegal aliens to use.

    AMERICANS ARE THE ENEMY! Long live the illegal alien victim. The American government is in place to punish Americans and champion non-American law breakers.

    If you throw all the taxpayers in jail, who will pay the taxes? Illegal aliens?

  15. #15
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:53 pm, flaming_o said:

    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:37 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    Repealing the 16th amendment and passing the FairTax would be the best thing for the economy.

    The operative word is “and”. I fully expect that if the Fair Tax were ever enacted, it would exist in addition to, and not in place of, all income taxes. A national 23% Fair Tax would be a flat tax and a great, across-the-board economic leveler but all other taxes would absolutely have to go. And what guarantee do we have that they would go? I don’t trust anyone – let alone the government – with the contents of my wallet.

  16. #16
    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:59 pm, Flyoverman said:

    I would love to see Raul Grijalva audited. If he is not a major recipient of cartel money, I will eat my car.

  17. #17
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:07 pm, Rorschach said:

    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:49 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    Any company that is found with illegal aliens in it’s employ should have the CEO, President, Owner, whatever, sent to jail. 6 months should do. No business contact for those 6 months.

    That’s the answer right there! Put American citizens who pay taxes in jail! woohoo! That’s good government in a free society. A non-taxpayer breaks the law? who cares? let them go. they only want a better life.

    it’s those evil American tax payers that are the problem. Yeah, send them to jail and force them to pay for the schools and hospitals and police for the illegal aliens to use.

    AMERICANS ARE THE ENEMY! Long live the illegal alien victim. The American government is in place to punish Americans and champion non-American law breakers.

    If you throw all the taxpayers in jail, who will pay the taxes? Illegal aliens?

    Except by hiring Illegals Thwacker, they are EVADING taxes.

  18. #18
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:09 pm, wren said:

    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:35 pm, ThackerAgency said:
    I really don’t understand why this issue is so hard. Seriously build a fence.

    You’re right! If we had the right people in Congress solving our border security issues would not be hard at all.

    But can we trust the current crop of Congresspeople to have the same perspective on protecting our country as we do?

    Watch this video of California Rep. Loretta Sanchez, who has been the Chairwoman of the Border Security Committee in Congress since 2007, speaking to the Hispanic Caucus and comparing a fence on our southern border to the Berlin Wall.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcyHgwEexX0&feature=related

    The issue depends on which side of the fence our elected Congresspeople are on.

    If you really want to secure our southern border, we need to replace Rep. Loretta Sanchez with Van Tran in California and replace Raul Grijalva with Ruth McClung in Arizona!

  19. #19
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:10 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On October 18th, 2010 at 3:59 pm, Flyoverman said:

    I would love to see Raul Grijalva audited. If he is not a major recipient of cartel money, I will eat my car.

    Why not just ask him? I would like to see reporters asking all pro-amnesty, pro-open borders, pro-sanctuary city politicians point blank not even whether they are on the take but how much they are taking.

    We know it’s happening and we know it is a very very large amount of money (trillions). You can’t base the biggest business in the world on cash-on-the-barrel dollar settlements unless you know that you can laundering that money. And you can’t launder that money without crooked banks, crooked politicians, crooked regulators and crooked multi-national corporations.

    Since we know it is happening and the benefactors are so obvious, what’s stopping everyone from asking? Just look for the snakes who look like they swallowed a pig.

  20. #20
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:11 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    A national 23% Fair Tax would be a flat tax and a great, across-the-board economic leveler but all other taxes would absolutely have to go. And what guarantee do we have that they would go?

    Within the FairTax bill is specific text repealing all other taxes. Everything goes.

    Passing the FairTax does not require the repeal of the 16th amendment. The advantage of repealing the 16th amendment is that you can word the new amendment so that income can never be taxed, in perpetuity. So there’s no going back to socialist class warfare.

    If you give the socialists a fall back position, they will stop at nothing to derail any economic success the FairTax brings and scream for the return of the income tax.

  21. #21
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:17 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Bonus- he is ugly, she is a babe.

    http://www.ruth4az.com/

  22. #22
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:20 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    A non-taxpayer breaks the law? who cares? let them go.

    I didn’t say not to punish the illegals. But hiring illegals is a violation of the law. So, put the company CEOs in jail for doing that.

    Obviously, if you know the company has hired illegals, then you’ve also caught the illegals! Throw them out on their @ss. And build a fence, too.

    I’m for stopping all illegal immigration. If it means putting a few CEOs in jail, erecting a fence, tracking down and deporting the illegals, GREAT! Do it all. But the quickest way is to show the illegals that there are no jobs here. No jobs, then they stop coming.

    Putting a few CEOs in jail will cause all other businesses to get rid of their illegal alien workers because the other CEOs don’t want to go to jail. Simple.

    Crackdown on all of the activity that makes the illegals want to come here.

  23. #23
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:35 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    But the quickest way is to show the illegals that there are no jobs here. No jobs, then they stop coming.

    I appreciate your sentiment, but let me point out something that happens in a healthy economy. . .

    People have work that needs to be done by people who want to do it.

    The fact that there are jobs is awesome! The fact that there are people that want to do the job is awesome!

    If we had a guest worker program where illegals could apply with no chance of citizenship and public benefits like welfare, medicaid, public education, that would be great for everyone.

    People who have work can hire people who want to work LEGALLY. But you have to build a fence. You can NOT reward illegal aliens by giving them citizenship. You don’t have to deport them all, and you CERTAINLY shouldn’t attack the problem by arresting American business people.

    The problem with illegals is the idea that they will be given instant citizenship. . . which would be OK if we weren’t an entitlement state now. As soon as they become citizens, we are responsible for their social security and medicare for as long as they live.

    We can’t afford to give current Americans what’s been promised yet.

    Illegal aliens aren’t terrible people. They just don’t deserve citizenship. AND they should pay some taxes from the money they earn (police and roads). And we need to know who they are officially in case crimes are committed.

  24. #24
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:36 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:10 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Why not just ask him?

    Works for me, Phil. ;)

    The look on his face would be priceless.

    “Given the amount of money the cartels are paying you to advocate a boycott of your own district, why can’t you mount a more effective re-election campaign?”

  25. #25
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:37 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:17 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:
    Bonus- he is ugly, she is a babe.

    http://www.ruth4az.com/

    Actually he looks like the wife of the Chilean miner who has the girlfriend on the side.

  26. #26
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:40 pm, Ty85719 said:

    Grijalva is so left, that if Che Guevara were alive today, he would wear shirts with Grijalva’s face on it

  27. #27
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:44 pm, PhredE said:

    Grijalva’s immigration grade from NumbersUSA: “F-”

    http://www.numbersusa.com/content/my/tools/grades/list/0/RECENT/az/A/Grade/Active

    It’s time to let someone else have a chance for a change.

  28. #28
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:45 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The ad hits McClung for supporting … “tax breaks for corporation shipping jobs overseas.”

    Exactly the same attack on Djou here in Hawaii.

    In their debate he asked her which specific bills he had supported would she have vetoed. She squirmed, then said she couldn’t say because she hadn’t read them. Heh.

    He also has a nice ad with video of his opponent saying there really is no waste in government.

  29. #29
    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:48 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The American dream is to be self reliant and work to achieve the life that you want, not live off the government. – Ruth McClung

    Or in this case, someone else’s governemnt.

  30. #30
    On October 18th, 2010 at 5:02 pm, babiesgrandma said:

    At the risk of sounding racccciiiissssttt, I have found during my few years having to deal with Medicaid (not for me – for someone else), guess who gets all the medical aid they need free of charge? Guess which language is spoken at the clinic? I saw babies being popped out to provide an anchor for the mother and/or father; the VERY YOUNG mothers are taught nothing different than to have a baby by 15 or 16, make everyone legal, get free medical care for life, and you don’t even have to speak the language to enjoy MY TAX DOLLARS.

  31. #31
    On October 18th, 2010 at 5:27 pm, jrgdds said:

    I just matched Michelle’s contribution to Ruth McClung.

    I’ll stay at home this weekend instead of gassing up the truck and boat to go fish on the Columbia. This country desperately needs to get rid of traitors like Grijalva, and the Chinook aren’t biting anyway…

  32. #32
    On October 18th, 2010 at 5:41 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    I saw babies being popped out to provide an anchor for the mother and/or father; the VERY YOUNG mothers are taught nothing different than to have a baby by 15 or 16, make everyone legal, get free medical care for life, and you don’t even have to speak the language to enjoy MY TAX DOLLARS..

    Yup. Our leftists in government encourage this behavior aided by immigrant organizations who both see this as a means of increasing their political power, with Uncle Sap (i.e. our tax paying public)footing the bill.

  33. #33
    On October 18th, 2010 at 5:44 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    wren said:

    As of 9/30

    Ruth McClung had Cash on Hand = $29,939

    Rep. Raul Grijalva had Cash on Hand = $231,416

    Wonder how much of that $231K he had left came from foreigners donating online with store bought Visa gift cards?

    No worries though. David Axelrod is going to get to the bottom of it.

  34. #34
    On October 18th, 2010 at 5:48 pm, T-Bone said:

    Raul, any foreign money in your campaign? Any money from Mexicans?

    White House, you better get on that right away. Foreigners may be stealing our elections.

  35. #35
    On October 18th, 2010 at 5:55 pm, rightisright said:

    Now, open-borders incumbent Raul Grijalva is screaming “RAAAAADICAL” and the DCCC is trying to ride to his rescue by attacking her as fiscally irresponsible:

    Now that is rich, a liberal accusing others of financial irresponsibility.

    ————-

    As far as the 23% national sales tax goes, I don’t think Ms. McClung isn’t up on the “Fair Tax” in it’s entirety. I’ve noticed a lot of conservatives not necessarily politicians do not have a good idea of how it would work, too bad…it may not be a perfect system, but it beats the hell out of what we have now.

    best of Luck to Ms. McClung

  36. #36
    On October 18th, 2010 at 6:07 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Raul Grijalva is the best Congressman Mexico has, they would really hate to lose that seat.

  37. #37
    On October 18th, 2010 at 6:16 pm, xblade said:

    I didn’t say not to punish the illegals. But hiring illegals is a violation of the law. So, put the company CEOs in jail for doing that.

    CEOs don’t hire people. You think the Microsoft CEO knows anything about Jose the illegal that cleans up the factory in NC? Just because an illegal is employed somewhere doesn’t mean the CEO is at fault.

    Now, if the CEO and company have made it company policy to hire illegals, that’s a different story.

  38. #38
    On October 18th, 2010 at 6:17 pm, zorro said:

    The race card is the only card that clown has to play!

    Now is the time conservatives, support Ruth McClung and as many conservative candidates as you can.

  39. #39
    On October 18th, 2010 at 6:18 pm, xblade said:

    How can this even be possible? Michael Medved assured us that Arizona’s desire to crack down on illegals would cost Republicans elections in Arizona…heck in the entire country in 2010, and beyond, and we would forever more be subject to Democrat rule because of it.

  40. #40
    On October 18th, 2010 at 7:05 pm, right_on said:

    Raul Grijalva is screaming “RAAAAADICAL!”

    Hay, carumba! The only thing radical is the size of this guy’s melon! How does a guy who has only half a brain, get a noggin that roomy?

  41. #41
    On October 18th, 2010 at 7:15 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I sent Ruth some money a while ago, and actually received a Thank You letter without another solicitation for more money! I like that! I HOPE SHE WINS!! These ridiculous slurs and lies that have NOTHING to do with the issues is what is going to defeat those moron regressives. It shows they have nothing to say! Unbelievable the junk they pull out of their arses when they have nothing else. And, why would anyone vote for a person who wants to boycott his own constituants?

  42. #42
    On October 18th, 2010 at 7:20 pm, rambler said:

    The only “radicals” or “extremists” are the very people who are calling everyone else radicals and extremists. We are tired of everyone of them shoving socialism down our throats. They have burned all their bridges because they chose to govern by their will and not ours. They lied to us. They deceived us and they insulted us. I want them scared. I want them unemployed. I want they jailed! And after that, I want their traitorous butts on a plane out of here. If it’s so nice to live in a socialist country, I want them there and not here mucking things up again after we clean it up. They can take Soros with them.

  43. #43
    On October 18th, 2010 at 7:40 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Soros is the one funding the “fundamental transformation” of our nation against our will. Amnesty is part of the plan.

    Medved is one of his stooges, even if he doesn’t know it. Advocating abandoning the rule of law isn’t conservative, it’s not even American.

    Amnesty is surrender.

    Of the rule of law and our country.

  44. #44
    On October 18th, 2010 at 7:41 pm, sbw999 said:

    How stupid do you have to be to vote for a moron who called for a boycott of his own State?

  45. #45
    On October 18th, 2010 at 7:54 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On October 18th, 2010 at 6:16 pm, xblade said:

    A fish rots from the head. If CEOs were made personally responsible for assuring that all employees were legal residents, the problem would at least shrink spectacularly if not disappear entirely.

    One of the questions that always comes up when soliciting 401(k) plans is whether the company’s investment committee understands that they are each personally liable if anything goes wrong. You might be surprised to learn how many didn’t know that until we told them. I assure you that revealing that fact changes attitudes. Suddenly, “Good enough!” doesn’t cut it anymore.

    If that level of personal liability can be imposed on those responsible for administering 401(k) plans, why can’t it be placed on CEOs to certify that all of company’s employees are in the US legally?

  46. #46
    On October 18th, 2010 at 8:03 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    MHO…all open-borders supporters should be jailed for aiding and abetting illegal immigration!!

  47. #47
    On October 18th, 2010 at 8:06 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    My company just went through and redid everyone’s I-9. Birth certificates were required. No jpg’s on the internet accepted. Guess Barry couldn’t work here.

  48. #48
    On October 18th, 2010 at 8:16 pm, Dimsdale said:

    Is his head abnormally large, or is Øbama’s extraordinarily small?

  49. #49
    On October 18th, 2010 at 10:33 pm, Azygos said:

    Raul, any how much foreign money in your campaign? Any And how much did you receive from the mexican cartels this time money from Mexicans?

    Fixed it for ya.

    Michelle thank you for continuing to highlight Ruth McClung for us. I am not in her district but will send her some more cash tomorrow when I get paid. And please, if you can send anything even if its only a dollar it will make a difference.

  50. #50
    On October 19th, 2010 at 2:28 am, By Choice said:

    On October 18th, 2010 at 4:35 pm, ThackerAgency said:

    If we had a guest worker program where illegals could apply with no chance of citizenship and public benefits like welfare, medicaid, public education, that would be great for everyone

    We have a “guest worker” program they are called HB1-pick a letter- Visas. There are many of them for specific industries, including one for athletes who have contracts with major league teams.

    The problem is that once they have the visas they don’t give them back and they don’t leave when their 6 months are up. There is no tracking system on Visas–but you can go any where in the world and put you ATM card in the slot and get money from your account as well as your current balance. What if there were ATM machines that you had to put your visas in to report where you were every 30 days?? And if you didnt the police/Border Patrol/ICE/IRS would go to your last address and find out where you were.

    We have very effective immigration laws but what we don’t have is a government willing to enforce the laws and whiney politicians that do favors for their “constituents”. We need to clean the House and the Senate and in two weeks it is going to be a good start.

    Be aware though that the last day of the Senate session Sen Menendez submitted SB 3932 “Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2010″ that the lame duck Congress will get to play with. The bill is 875 invisible pages because it is not posted anywhere, yet, and probably won’t be until they go back to DC. You can bet that Grijalva will go to whatever means necessary to get that passed before he “retires”.

    BTW, right after he called for the boycott of AZ businesses he went to the Mexican Consulate in Nogales and supported them in their complaint against AZ at the UN (like we care, but just goes to show which side of the fence he is really on).

  51. #51
    On October 19th, 2010 at 6:44 am, tbear44 said:

    On October 18th, 2010 at 7:41 pm, sbw999 said:
    How stupid do you have to be to vote for a moron who called for a boycott of his own State?

    Never underestimate the stupidity of democratic voters.

  52. #52
    On October 19th, 2010 at 8:10 am, tarpon said:

    This would be nice, give if you can.

  53. #53
    On October 19th, 2010 at 11:57 am, PhredE said:

    “If we had a guest worker program where illegals could apply with no chance of citizenship and public benefits like welfare, medicaid, public education, that would be great for everyone”

    How? Who says we even NEED the workers?
    In an environment of 9.5% ‘official’ unemployment and unofficial but ever-so-real 16%-18% underemployment, do we really NEED to import more people to compete for a limited and dwindling number of jobs? That defies logic at the most basic level.

  54. #54
    On October 19th, 2010 at 8:38 pm, BrianNY said:

    Now, open-borders incumbent Raul Grijalva is screaming “RAAAAADICAL”

    What’s eating Raul?

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook