Department of Social Justice deploys poll-watching army; Update: Holder double standards…activated!; Update: Judge to DOJ: Your AZ lawsuit sucks

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 1, 2010 06:40 PM

Scroll for updates…

Corruptocrat Attorney General Attorney General is dispatching hundreds of Department of Social Justice election observers.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

The DO(S)J won’t say why it picked certain jurisdictions and not others:

The Department of Justice has announced that it is deploying “more than 400 federal observers and department personnel to 30 jurisdictions in 18 states” from its Civil Rights Division to monitor polls on Election Day tomorrow.

It is the responsibility of state and local governments to administer elections, but the Civil Rights Division is empowered to make sure that Americans have equal access to ballots.

According to a Justice Department release, the poll monitors will, among other tasks, “gather information on whether voters are subject to different voting qualifications or procedures on the basis of race, color, or membership in a language minority group.” The Civil Rights Division has also set up a phone number and web portal to allow people to complain of voter intimidation or coercion.

Observers will be deployed in jurisdictions in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, South Dakota, Texas, Florida, Hawaii, Mississippi, Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania and Tennessee.

A representative for the Department of Justice told Hotsheet that she could not get into specifics about why certain jurisdictions were chosen.

Maybe DO(S)J is teaming up with the New Black Panther Party to help police citizen watchdogs.

Houston NBPP thug Quannell X, featured in the news segment above, once threatened “your damn city will go up in flames” after a contentious police shooting trial; infamously invited black-on-white assaults when he said “If you feel that you just got to mug somebody because of your hurt and your pain, go to River Oaks and mug you some good white folks;” and incited violence at another protest here:

Bring your cameras. It’s not just your right. It’s your responsibility.

***

Update: Look at this — corruptocrat AG Eric Holder’s double standards already at work, via J. Christian Adams at Election Law Center:

Election Law Center has obtained the flyer for the Corrine Brown Get Out the Vote free meal. As the flyer above states, “the first 350 to vote at the library will receive a complimentary coupon for lunch at Mama Nem’s Soul Food Restaurant.” This says the free meal is only available to those who vote.

We previously asked whether the Justice Department will be sending a letter like it sent to the WWE for having a tshirt giveaway, regardless of whether or not the person voted, on a first come first served basis.

Update: So, will the DOJ be sending a warning letter to the SEIU for its pizza-and-drinks giveaway in Arizona? Hmmm???

Update: On the Road With the King Street Patriots of Houston, Texas

Follow Anita MonCrief’s team of citizen watch dogs on the ground at Emerging Corruption.

Update: On a related note, a federal judge administers a refreshing dose of reality in the Arizona immigration lawsuit case. Via WaPo:

A federal appellate judge expressed deep skepticism Monday about a Justice Department lawsuit challenging Arizona’s new immigration law, leaving uncertain the Obama administration’s chances of stopping the law from taking effect.

Judge John T. Noonan Jr. grilled administration lawyers at a hearing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. He took aim at the core of the Justice Department’s argument: that the Arizona statute is “preempted” by federal law and is especially troublesome because it requires mandatory immigration status checks in certain circumstances.

“I’ve read your brief, I’ve read the District Court opinion, I’ve heard your interchange with my two colleagues, and I don’t understand your argument,” Noonan told deputy solicitor general Edwin S. Kneedler. “We are dependent as a court on counsel being responsive. . . . You keep saying the problem is that a state officer is told to do something. That’s not a matter of preemption. . . . I would think the proper thing to do is to concede that this is a point where you don’t have an argument.”

Flashback: DOJ vs. Arizona: The battle over preemption; Updated with complaint link

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Politics

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On November 1st, 2010 at 6:42 pm, jrgdds said:

    Who is going to watch the poll watchers?

  2. #2
    On November 1st, 2010 at 6:43 pm, tarpon said:

    Bring your billy clubs just in case.

    Regardless, we surround them, just add more tea party poll watchers.

  3. #3
    On November 1st, 2010 at 6:51 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    We are to be civil-not interact and refer all questions to somebody else. Chances are they will not be at my polling station but if they do I shall act as Lady Linda, Coordinator of All That Is Election, instructs.

  4. #4
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:00 pm, Hangfire said:

    Hawaii? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over?

  5. #5
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:05 pm, tre said:

    Did Corruptocrat Attorney General Eric Holder instruct the US Marshals Service to deputize the Black Panthers to be poll watchers?

  6. #6
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:05 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Who is going to watch the poll watchers?

    You.

    You have as much right as they do. Inquire with an election inspector if you can be an observer. If circumstances and space permit, they should allow it. Look online for the rules in your state.

    We are to be civil

    Absolutely.

    Bring your cameras.

    But don’t take photos or video inside the polling place without authorization or unless the circumstances become extreme, or you may likely face charges.

    Look up your state’s election statutes to know what you can and cannot do.

  7. #7
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:07 pm, right_on said:

    The (Afro-American & Black Muslim) Civil Rights Division is empowered to make sure that (non-)Americans (will) have equal access to ballots, (and if not, will have the capacity to vote more than once.)

    Reading between the lines, based on past elections….

    A representative for the Department of Justice told Hotsheet that she could not get into specifics about why certain jurisdictions were chosen.

    Based on recent elections, the DOJ must ensure that white people with cameras do not harass, nor harangue members of the NBPP…oh, and don’t falsely accuse them of voter intimidation, while catching them on video (like what happened in Philly in 2008.) Can’t have that again!

  8. #8
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:12 pm, jrgdds said:

    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:05 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    If the ORP doesn’t need me to drive people to the polls, I will.

  9. #9
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:13 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Are they going to bring their iota detectors? We crackers tend to leave trails.

  10. #10
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:17 pm, dat60a3 said:

    With people like Quanell X and CongressWOMAAAN Sheila Jackson-Lee watching the watchers, why do we need watchers from the Department of Just Us?

  11. #11
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:26 pm, spaceycakes said:

    I hate every iota of a crackah!

    :lol:

  12. #12
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:28 pm, Speakup said:

    The automatic assumption of most people is that the observers won’t be partisan.

  13. #13
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:30 pm, T-Bone said:

    Where’s Jimma Carter when you need him?

  14. #14
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:32 pm, SpeakEasy said:

    I’m reminded of a scene from Enemy of the State.

    Congressman Sam Albert: [on TV] We knew that we had to monitor our enemies. We’ve also come to realise that we need to monitor the people who are monitoring them…
    Carla Dean: Well, who’s gonna monitor the monitors of the monitors?

  15. #15
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:37 pm, T-Bone said:

    My automatic assumption was the observers would be partisan.

    This is Eric Holder we are talking about. He doesn’t care about fair elections. He cares about electing black people democrats.

  16. #16
    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:47 pm, Truesoldier said:

    I know that Seattle is getting one of these “observers” seeing that King County (Seattle) is known for voter fraud. I would almost be willing to bet that these “observers” are being sent to large blue cities so that the DOJ can claim that there is no voter fraud when they throw the election.

  17. #17
    On November 1st, 2010 at 8:00 pm, J.J. Sefton said:

    Poll-watching would’ve been the perfect job for that internal security force Obama proposed -the one that was supposed to be at least as big as the US military and as well armed.

    Wow.

  18. #18
    On November 1st, 2010 at 8:01 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    jrgdds: Cool. I probably will, too. And so should anyone else if they have time. I commented on this and on a couple of other aspects about Election Day in the open thread from earlier. I now pretentiously link to that most unnecessary advice here.

  19. #19
    On November 1st, 2010 at 8:48 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Did Corruptocrat Attorney General Eric Holder instruct the US Marshals Service to deputize the Black Panthers to be poll watchers?

    Poll-watching would’ve been the perfect job for that internal security force Obama proposed -the one that was supposed to be at least as big as the US military and as well armed.

    Ah, I believe they represent the nucleus of TEH WONs “Civilian National Security Force”, of which you write.

  20. #20
    On November 1st, 2010 at 8:51 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    the basis of race, color, or membership in a language minority group.” …
    Observers will be deployed in… Hawaii…

    Hahaha – the party bringing you the two white men running for Governor and Lt Governor think the party with the two minorities (one a woman) are racists!

    Idiots.

  21. #21
    On November 1st, 2010 at 8:57 pm, regularguy said:

    One of the myriad of things which must be done when taking back Congress and the presidency is to demand prosecution for voter fraud, including corruption in the Holder social justice department. Payback is in order. No forgive and forget. This election and those which come after must be to exact prison time on these types. Absolutely no allowing these types any position of authority, power, or views from other than a prison cell.

  22. #22
    On November 1st, 2010 at 9:16 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    The Department of Justice has announced that it is deploying “more than 400 federal observers and department personnel

    Good jobs at good wages!

  23. #23
    On November 1st, 2010 at 9:22 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    We are to be civil

    Dalton: All you have to do is follow three simple rules. One, never underestimate your opponent. Expect the unexpected. Two, take it outside. Never start anything inside the voting booth unless it’s absolutely necessary. And three, be nice.

    Dalton: People who really want to have a good time voting won’t come to a slaughterhouse. And we’ve got entirely too many troublemakers here. Too many 40-year-old adolescents, felons, power drinkers and trustees of modern chemistry.

    Dalton: If somebody gets in your face and calls you a @#$%sucker, I want you to be nice. Ask him to walk. Be nice. If he won’t walk, walk him. But be nice. If you can’t walk him, one of the others will help you, and you’ll both be nice. I want you to remember that it’s a job. It’s nothing personal.

    Dalton: I want you to be nice until it’s time to not be nice.

  24. #24
    On November 1st, 2010 at 9:26 pm, Azygos said:

    T

    he Department of Justice has announced that it is deploying “more than 400 federal observers and department personnel

    He can find 40 poll watchers at the drop of a hat but can’t find anyone to go watch the border?

  25. #25
    On November 1st, 2010 at 9:29 pm, txvet2 said:

    I can help it, I feel like a kid on Christmas Eve.

  26. #26
    On November 1st, 2010 at 9:29 pm, Azygos said:

    400, damn

    PIMF

  27. #27
    On November 1st, 2010 at 9:36 pm, jrgdds said:

    T’was the night before elections
    And all through the town
    Tempers were flaring
    Emotions all up and down

    I, in my bathrobe
    With a pup on my lap
    Had cut off the TV
    tired of political crap

    When all of a sudden
    There arose such a noise
    I peered out my window
    Saw Obama and his boys

    They had come for my wallet
    They wanted my pay
    To give to the others
    Who had not worked a day!

    He snatched up my money
    And quick as a wink
    Jumped back on his bandwagon
    My money in hand

    He then rallied his henchmen
    Who were pulling his cart
    I could tell they were out
    To tear my country apart!

    ‘On Fannie, on Freddie,
    On Biden and Ayers!
    On Acorn, On Pelosi’
    He screamed at the pairs!

    They took off for his cause
    And as they flew out of sight
    I heard him laugh at the nation
    Who wouldn’t stand up and fight!

    So I leave you to think
    On this one final note
    IF YOU DON’T WANT SOCIALISM
    GET OUT AND VOTE !!!!

    GOD BLESS AMERICA, OUR ONLY HOPE!

    Make it happen!

  28. #28
    On November 1st, 2010 at 9:40 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    On November 1st, 2010 at 7:00 pm, Hangfire said:
    Hawaii? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over?

    Maybe just to make sure access to certain records stay in the right hands?

  29. #29
    On November 1st, 2010 at 9:41 pm, surfhut said:

    I, too, feel like a kid on Christmas Eve. Hope no shenanigans occur at my polling place here in Los Angeles, but am charging up my camera tonight … just in case. Bring your cameras!

  30. #30
    On November 1st, 2010 at 9:46 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    The Department of JustUs needs to ensure we have the same kind of free and fair elections that Jimmy Carter has observed and admired in Venezuela/sarc

    Seriously, that’s where we’re headed if we don’t really drain the swamp of the District of Corruption.

  31. #31
    On November 1st, 2010 at 9:51 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Make it happen!

    Yes, please. (Is that you, Keli?)

  32. #32
    On November 1st, 2010 at 10:52 pm, dan708 said:

    I live in a rural township, but I will definitely have a digi camera in my car. You can’t be too sure.

  33. #33
    On November 1st, 2010 at 10:56 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Not really DOJ personnel; local subcontractors from ACORN and SEIU.

  34. #34
    On November 1st, 2010 at 11:32 pm, Mister P said:

    No voting booths here in Oregon. I would like to see the AG go get the military ballots.

  35. #35
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:38 am, Republicanvet said:

    On November 1st, 2010 at 11:32 pm, Mister P said:

    No voting booths here in Oregon. I would like to see the AG go get the military ballots.

    Interesting they can send over paid buffoons to make sure certain ethnic groups have adequate access to the polls in some places, yet in Illinois where they should have been crawling up the azz of many election officials over military absentee ballots….not much effort.

    I have been thoroughly disgusted with politicians of both parties since the 2000 election in not guaranteeing the ability to vote for those wearing our uniform.

  36. #36
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 7:48 am, zoyclem said:

    Will these ‘poll watchers’ be equipped with billyclubs?

  37. #37
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 8:01 am, Beukeboom said:

    With the known voter intimitation by the New Black Panther Party and the do-nothing attitude of the current DoJ under the Obama regime I hope plenty of conservatives use video cameras, camera phones, and other recording devices to document any and all shenanigans at polling places across the country. With conservatives taking over the House such documentation should spur House investigations.

  38. #38
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 8:15 am, McCloud9 said:

    Just out of curiosity, I wonder who Aunt Zuni is voting for?
    Did she recieve her Absentee Ballot?
    I will wager she voted, maybe even twice.

  39. #39
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 8:20 am, Flyoverman said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 7:48 am, zoyclem said:

    Will these ‘poll watchers’ be equipped with billyclubs?

    Never bring a billy club to a gunfight. ;)

  40. #40
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 8:34 am, chapoutier said:

    Update: On a related note, a federal judge administers a refreshing dose of reality in the Arizona immigration lawsuit case. Via WaPo:

    Interesting. Here’s an AP article coming to pretty much the opposite conclusion.

    Appeals court hints at tossing part of Arizona law…

    Less than a day before the law was to take effect, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton blocked key provisions, including a requirement that immigrants carry immigration papers. On Monday, Bea told Kneedler “I don’t think you have to spend a whole lot of time” arguing the unconstitutionality of that provision.

  41. #41
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 8:43 am, babiesgrandma said:

    Two points to ponder today, as I get ready to go to vote:
    1) Why didn’t Blumenthal (D-Liar) quit or get so far down in the polls when he LIED about his Service in VIET NAM? Why? Linda McMahon is fighting for her life.

    Her Democratic opponent is Richard Blumenthal. His penchant for (to be polite) tactical imprecision goes beyond his various falsehoods — he says he “misspoke” every time — about serving in Vietnam.

    and

    2) How come I never got my sample ballot in the mail? How come when I called the County Clerk’s office that they were having a meltdown about my questions? and, couldn’t answer even after putting someone else on the phone.

    So, good luck everyone.

  42. #42
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 8:45 am, Little Ma said:

    Georgia? They’re coming to Georgia? Hmmm….. Maybe because we have to show picture ID?

    I’m taking my camera with me this morning.

  43. #43
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 8:47 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    A representative for the Department of Justice told Hotsheet that she could not get into specifics about why certain jurisdictions were chosen.

    Regardless of where they are sent, the reason is to make sure illegals are able to vote.

  44. #44
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 9:22 am, Jimmie said:

    doj on the job making sure that those that they wish to break the law can….and helping the “new panthers” scare away the “undesirable” elements….see what you get when you loose the peoples faith in government? The liberals biggest HOPE seems to be that the government will survive with more than half the population not trusting the election process?……

  45. #45
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 9:45 am, hawkeye54 said:

    Regardless of where they are sent, the reason is to make sure illegals are able to vote.

    Add to that, ANYONE ineligible to vote, just as long as they vote Democrat.

  46. #46
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 9:57 am, RedDog said:

    The New Black Panthers are ominously reminiscent of the Tonton Macoutes of the Haiti regime of Francois Duvalier. Wow. These guys are unpredictable and dangerous. Be very careful people.

  47. #47
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 9:57 am, sbw999 said:

    2012 cannot come soon enough to rid ourselves of this racially divisive, corrupt America-hating administration.

  48. #48
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 9:59 am, sbw999 said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 9:57 am, RedDog said:

    The New Black Panthers are ominously reminiscent of the Tonton Macoutes of the Haiti regime of Francois Duvalier. Wow. These guys are unpredictable and dangerous. Be very careful people.

    With due respect they seem like a paper tiger to me. All bluster. This isnt the late 60′s anymore. The BPP speak only to a small minority of radical fringe people. And they do not appear to want physical conflict with anybody, I believe out of fear that their “enemies” just might do something in response other than curl up into the fetal position.

  49. #49
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 10:01 am, Popeye3 said:

    Just returned from voting, only a single NRA member stumping for conservatives outside the poll, here in Virginia Beach, Virginia. Sent this message: Goodbye Rep. Glenn Nye, and tell Senator Jim Webb he’s next in two years.

  50. #50
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 10:05 am, hawkeye54 said:

    only a single NRA member stumping for conservatives outside the poll, here in Virginia Beach,

    Intimidation!!! Must be reported immediately!!!!

  51. #51
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 10:06 am, RedDog said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 8:34 am, chapoutier said:
    Here’s an AP article coming to pretty much the opposite conclusion.

    Appeals court hints at tossing part of Arizona law…

    Less than a day before the law was to take effect, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton blocked key provisions, including a requirement that immigrants carry immigration papers. On Monday, Bea told Kneedler “I don’t think you have to spend a whole lot of time” arguing the unconstitutionality of that provision.

    No other nation on earth has such lax controls on foreign citizen participation in their elections and social services as does America. Asking people for their “papers” before giving them access is not considered unresonable anywhere in the world except in the heads of activist American judges. If reason and the rule of law prevails, I believe the DOJ suit fades away. Anyway the Dems have no political capital or energy to press it after today.

  52. #52
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 10:24 am, Dimsdale said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 8:34 am, chapoutier said:

    Update: On a related note, a federal judge administers a refreshing dose of reality in the Arizona immigration lawsuit case. Via WaPo:

    Interesting. Here’s an AP article coming to pretty much the opposite conclusion.

    Appeals court hints at tossing part of Arizona law…

    Less than a day before the law was to take effect, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton blocked key provisions, including a requirement that immigrants carry immigration papers. On Monday, Bea told Kneedler “I don’t think you have to spend a whole lot of time” arguing the unconstitutionality of that provision.

    Apparently, the “Justice” Department did have to spend a lot of time. To no apparent effect, given this 11/1/10 decision.

    Wouldn’t new citizens be proud of the fact that they are now citizens? The ones I know are, and wouldn’t have a problem proving it.

    Root out and kick out illegals, and the problem is solved. And I don’t believe there is any restriction about them taking their “anchor babies” with them.

    Oh wait, that’s what the AZ legislation was about…

  53. #53
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 10:28 am, WarEagle82 said:

    No BPA members hanging around my precinct today!

    Lines were relatively short this morning even though they had only 3 electronic voting machines available instead of the normal 5 or 6. And the scanner for paper ballots was out of service.

    They had more electronic voting machines at the GOP Primary earlier this year! Of course, they only had two years to get ready for today.

    It just goes to show that government does nothing well…

  54. #54
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:08 pm, BruceB said:

    The next violent revolution may start on Nov 3 2012

  55. #55
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:15 pm, Buy Danish said:

    As the flyer above states, “the first 350 to vote at the library will receive a complimentary coupon for lunch at Mama Nem’s Soul Food Restaurant.”

    Ha! That’s pretty raaacist. Remember this scandal at the NBC cafeteria? And this?

  56. #56
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:23 pm, Blackstone said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 8:34 am, chapoutier said:

    Interesting. Here’s an AP article coming to pretty much the opposite conclusion.

    Looking at both Michelle’s cite and yours, I’d say the court’s moving in the direction of striking down the requirement to carry documentation (presumably on the grounds that federal law already takes care of that), but upholding the law’s requirement that state LEO’s check the immigration status of people they arrest or detain.

    I think I could live with that.

  57. #57
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 2:04 pm, dan708 said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:08 pm, BruceB said:

    The next violent revolution may start on Nov 3 2012

    Yeah, I’ve been concerned about the possibility of widespread rioting in the cities after OweBowMao gets what’s coming.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook