Unhinged Perriello/Obama supporter rips up GOP signs, screams “You f**king House nigger white-black bitch!”

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 2, 2010 09:18 AM

Via J.P. Freire at the Examiner, a supporter of Democrat congressional candidate Tom Perriello and Barack Obama demonstrates a little, ahem, “insane rage” that won’t be spotlighted on the nightly news or decried on the NYTimes op-ed page.

Maybe he’ll get a guest hosting spot on The View or an honorary membership to the New Black Panther Party

Especially love how he screams “You f**king House nigger white-black bitch!” at a black GOP woman and then turns around and screams “RAAAAACIST!” at her and the rest of the peaceful conservative activists peacefully sitting together in their yard.

See also: Unhinged.

Strap in and expect a lot more of this in the next 24 hours and beyond. Oh, yeah — bring your Slurpee!

Related tweet from Dennis Miller last night: “I am salivating in anticipation for tomorrow’s vote. Paybacks are a Behar.”

Related good read: Obama: Our first post-racial failure.

Related sore losers’ theme song today:

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Politics

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:32 am, John Deaux said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:24 am, Red State Skeptic said:
    You really see nothing racist about running a billboard that says “Vote American” when your challenger is Indian? You think that would fly if a Democrat ran that billboard against Bobby Jindal or Nikki Haley?

    Bobby Jindal or Nikki Haley are Americans and identify themselves as such, why would I have a problem with that?

    Umm, the link may be older, but the fact is that Paladino won his party’s nomination in just the last couple months. And my links are all from after Obama’s inauguration. Is 2009 too old to mean anything now?

    We’re talking about now, not six months ago. I’m not defending Paladino, just pointing out the meaning of current events.

  2. #102
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:33 am, stillontheroad said:

    Red State Skeptic said:
    “You really see nothing racist about running a billboard that says “Vote American” when your challenger is Indian? You think that would fly if a Democrat ran that billboard against Bobby Jindal or Nikki Haley?”

    Seems like this flew with narry a word said – begone dolt!

    Linda Sanchez, who was born in California to Mexican parents, said in an interview with Univision TV earlier this month that the “Vietnamese and the Republicans” in her district were “trying to take away” her House seat after “we have done so much for our community.”

  3. #103
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:35 am, J.J. Sefton said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:07 am, Red State Skeptic said:
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:04 am, J.J. Sefton said:
    Listen up, fool. I have watched the Glenn Beck program almost every day for the past year and half. I have NEVER seen any racist comments at all. NEVER.
    I was referring to his comparing the Democrats to Nazis. (Although calling the president a racist doesn’t help his cause.)

    That’s not racism, fool. That happens to be a very accurate description of the Democrats and their policies. Nazi is an acronym which means National SOCIALIST German Workers Party. Minus its exterminationist policies, its political and economic policies closely mirror that of the Dems, ie, liberal/leftist/socialist statism.

    They also were great admirers of Dr. Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood who believed that abortion should be used as a tool to eliminate certain classes of undesirables, specifically the AMERICAN NEGRO. These views on abortion and sterilization are popular with our current science czar, John Holdren, who is a classic Fabian Socialist.

    So calling the extreme Democrats/Liberals is not a racist statement, merely a statement of fact.

    I STAND BY MY STATEMENT.

  4. #104
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:36 am, spaceycakes said:

    You really see nothing racist about running a billboard that says “Vote American” when your challenger is Indian?

    You really see nothing racist about calling a person ‘Indian’ when they self-identify as American? Really? I think we’ve found the racist here.

  5. #105
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:37 am, infidel4life said:

    So much for the “post-racial” era ushered in by a black president. Instead it’s open season on whitey for all the haters on the left. We’re heading for a race war here in America.

  6. #106
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:37 am, J.J. Sefton said:

    And of course Linda Martinez encouraging her constituents to vote for her because her Vietnamese challenger will take away the seat from an Hispanic.

    No racism there, eh??

  7. #107
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:38 am, granite said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:21 am, frostrt said:

    Red:

    You have accused MM several times of deleting links you attempted to post….

    Let’s ask Michelle, or the site administrator, or whoever it is who deletes posts; whether in fact any links (claimed to have been) provided by this individual were deleted; and if so, why?

    Or, could it be that this individual is merely claiming to have tried to post links that were claimed to have been deleted; and that this is merely an example of the phony, impossible “Prove I didn’t do it” gambit?

  8. #108
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:39 am, granite said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:32 am, John Deaux said:

    Bobby Jindal or Nikki Haley are Americans and identify themselves as such, why would I have a problem with that?

    You beat me to it.
    Well said.

  9. #109
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:39 am, J.J. Sefton said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:37 am, infidel4life said:

    Maybe. But it certainly won’t be conservative Americans that will start it. But it will be fomented by SEIU union thugs and their lackeys.

  10. #110
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:41 am, granite said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:36 am, spaceycakes said:

    You really see nothing racist about calling a person ‘Indian’ when they self-identify as American? Really? I think we’ve found the racist here.

    I came in second place here, too!
    Well said!!

  11. #111
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:42 am, iamsaved said:

    RedState: you said – I’m sorry, there are not few. There are many. I would give you some links, but Michelle Malkin deleted the ones I already provided and I don’t have time to find them again.

    The only time I’ve had links disappear is when I forgot a key HTML code character(s) and hit submit before previewing. Are you positive you didn’t make an error at your end?

  12. #112
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:43 am, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Lesson of the day:

    Cops are scared of Black Democrats.

  13. #113
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:45 am, infidel4life said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:39 am, J.J. Sefton said:

    Oh, you’re absolutely right. But once conservative Americans are pushed beyond a certain point there will be hell to pay.

  14. #114
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:48 am, granite said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:35 am, J.J. Sefton said:

    So calling the extreme Democrats/Liberals socialists [Nazis] is not a racist statement, merely a statement of fact.

    FIFY a tiny bit.
    Agreed.

  15. #115
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:48 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Consider your alternative: Whoopi Goldberg, calm blue oceans, Helen Thomas (infamous racist btw), calm blue oceans, Rosa DeLauro, calm blue oceans, Hillary, calm blue oceans.

    Thanks for ruining my dream, now excuse me while I quietly walk into the calm blue ocean and drown myself.

  16. #116
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:48 am, sbw999 said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:18 am, granite said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:12 am, sbw999 said:

    It is inappropriate no matter who does it, and needs to stop.

    It is not at all inappropriate if it is accurate and supported by reference to historical parallels.

    Read “The Coming of the Third Reich”, by Richard Evans.

    Look, politically it is a non-starter. The moment you compare any pol party or group of voters as “Nazi’s” you just lost the argument, because your statement will be demagogued, whether or not you truly believe an historical comparison can be made. There are certainly a sufficient number of adjectives in the English language to describe what is going on today. Nazi’s and Nazism have an infamous and solitary place in history; and it ought to be left as such.

  17. #117
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:49 am, J.J. Sefton said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:45 am, infidel4life said:

    Look. Let’s get something clear. I do not like violence. I do not condone violence. I believe in the rule of law and civil discourse at all costs.

    All I will say that if, G-d forbid, violence happens, it will not be our side who incites it or perpetrates it.

  18. #118
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:50 am, docflash said:

    God doesn’t like ugly.

  19. #119
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:55 am, txvet2 said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:05 am, Red State Skeptic said:

    You know, you can rant all day and you’re not going to make yourself feel any better, nor make us feel worse. Only finding out that Harry managed to steal the election from Sharron could do that.

    If you want to make your point, you’re going to have to post examples of video or other confirmed racist acts by leftists or blacks from Huffpo or DU or Kos, or wherever you hang out, along with denunciations from your fellow leftists, to prove that they show both sides. Otherwise, you don’t have a point to make.

  20. #120
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:56 am, Mostly Annoyed said:

    Being a “True American” has nothing to do with were you were born. That just makes you a citizen of the United States of America. Being a “True American” is all about behavior, actions and deeds. What you do, what you believe, not where you were born. There certainly are a lot of people who were born here but are very un-American in their words and deeds. So no, a political sign caliming to be a “True American” is not racist in my opinion. For some people everything is racist first and never ask questions later. That in itself, is racist in my opinion, as well as inflamitory and stupid.

  21. #121
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:00 pm, Roland said:

    Nazi’s and Nazism have an infamous and solitary place in history; and it ought to be left as such.

    In winning arguments, maybe so, but they were certainly not unique in their evil. All socialists eventually get around to liquidating anyone they see as being their opponents.

    It is basic to the nature of socialism. It follows directly from the dehumanization of the individual that comes from the centralization of power.

  22. #122
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:02 pm, granite said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:48 am, sbw999 said:

    Look, politically it is a non-starter.

    You hadn’t say that.

    You ahd said that it was inappropriate.

    And, it is not what I believe.
    It’s my conclusion from a great deal of reading of history over the past 30+ years.

    Regarding:

    Nazi’s and Nazism have an infamous and solitary place in history

    ….

    They are infamous, but nowhere near solitary.
    As extremely, unbelievably evil as the Nazis were, Stalin and Mao killed/slaughtered many, many,…many more innocent people than did the Nazis.
    The reason that the comparison to “Reds” and “Communists” doesn’t evoke the same or worse reaction than the comparison to “Nazis” is that, at least since Woodrow Wilson, the democratsocialist politicians have been, well, socialists; and, of course, most of the folks who provide the news and write history books have, at the least, had socialist leanings.
    And, of course, for most of WWII, the Nazis were fighting the Russians.

  23. #123
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:03 pm, txvet2 said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:48 am, sbw999 said:

    Right. Stick with “fascist”. It makes the same point and everybody thinks you’re talking about the Italians.

  24. #124
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:04 pm, granite said:

    …hadn’t said….
    Apologies.

  25. #125
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:09 pm, Mostly Annoyed said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:03 pm, txvet2 said:
    Right. Stick with “fascist”. It makes the same point and everybody thinks you’re talking about the Italians.

    Italy, the little country with more corrupt politicians than the US… Only because they have twice an many politicians….

  26. #126
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:18 pm, J.J. Sefton said:

    This is why I say that there is no such thing as an extreme right wing. The odd nut ball and extremist is just that. The violence and hatred comes from groups like PETA, ELF, Weathermen, Red Brigades, Bader-Meinhoff, ETA, IRA etc. etc. ad nauseum. All leftists. But there really is no extreme left either. Here’s why:

    You are either for tyranny, oppression, human misery and squalor or you are for freedom, individual liberty, limited government and the rule of law.

    Translated you are either part of the long, sad, miserable history of the human race, or you are part of the American experiment.

  27. #127
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:19 pm, stillontheroad said:

    J.J. Sefton said:
    On the nose J.J. Thank you for that.

  28. #128
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:22 pm, stillontheroad said:

    I also live by this:
    “I swear by my Life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man,
    nor ask another man to live for the sake of mine.”

  29. #129
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:33 pm, granite said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:19 pm, stillontheroad said:

    J.J. Sefton said:

    On the nose J.J. Thank you for that.

    Agreed.

    The difference between the two irreconcilably different worldviews in a nutshell.

  30. #130
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:42 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    It would be interesting to find out the name of this crazed person and find if he’s (1) working for Perriello in any capacity and, (2) if he actually pays any taxes as he says he does?

  31. #131
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:45 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:38 am, granite said:

    Or, could it be that this individual is merely claiming to have tried to post links that were claimed to have been deleted; and that this is merely an example of the phony, impossible “Prove I didn’t do it” gambit?

    Here’s where you used to be able to find it. It was comment #49, which no longer exists.

  32. #132
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:46 pm, Roland said:

    You are either for tyranny, oppression, human misery and squalor or you are for freedom, individual liberty, limited government and the rule of law.

    Translated you are either part of the long, sad, miserable history of the human race, or you are part of the American experiment.

    Beautifully said, and my first reaction was total agreement, but there is a flaw with the earlier part of your comment.

    People who believe in limited government can disagree about how much government should be limited. Within that group there can be a left-right spectrum.

    In the 18th Century those in favor of more limited government would have been the “left,” but the spectrum has since flipped over, and now those favoring limited government are on the “right,” with those favoring more expansive, yet still limited government being on the “left.”

    Within that rational spectrum, I am actually on the “left,” being that I favor much of the “safety net” many on the more “right” side of the rational, limited government spectrum regard as abominable.

    So if I am on the “left,” then what am I doing here bashing the Democrats and cheering the Tea Party?

    The Democrat Party is all outside of the rational spectrum. I have never met a Democrat who will tell me just where they would limit the expansion of government. Not one. Ever. And most of the people I know are Democrats, including all of my extended family.

    None of them, not one, is, in fact, in favor of actually limiting government, although many of them lie about it and then refuse to say just where they would limit it when another law would “do good.”

    The rational spectrum can also degenerate on the right when the extreme right wing verges on anarchy …. which actually brings us back to the socialists outside of the rational spectrum, since anarchy leads directly to the tyranny of the strongest and the reestablishment of the centralization of power and the dehumanization of the individual.

  33. #133
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:49 pm, stillontheroad said:

    RSS :
    Whitewashing black racism; Shabazz: “Prepare for war”
    Why thank you for pointing out, that which all of us here are well aware, the absolute racism of the New Black Panther party.

  34. #134
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:53 pm, emjem24 said:

    Red State Skeptic said:
    Here’s where you used to be able to find it. It was comment #49, which no longer exists.

    Ohhhh… you got us know… an equivocal sign of racism from a nonexistent comment. Could it have been edited because it violated TOS? I mean, if MM had standards and felt that comment didn’t meet them then perhaps that is why the comment no longer exists. That couldn’t possible be the reason, could it?

    Yep, we’re properly chagrined now. Keep on fighting for all the horrible victims of racism. I mean… it doesn’t matter who the victims of racism are as long as you acknowledge them, right? Even if they’re white victims of reverse racism?

  35. #135
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:53 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    I will now happily assume that all posts that are deleted on this board were from RSS and all contained cause for extreme prejudice.

  36. #136
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:55 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Thanks Dances for getting back to that video. I am sooo thankful for the internet. I believe things will eventually change for the good because ‘bad people’ of all ideologies/colors will be exposed.

  37. #137
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:58 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I have seen many people write in your comments that only black people in this country are racists

    Has she deleted all of these posts? Show me one that says that only black people in this country are racists.

    PS – have a nice day – America has a message for you and your Marxist hero…

  38. #138
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:00 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:53 pm, emjem24 said:

    Could it have been edited because it violated TOS?

    It was nothing more than a collection of links showing racism on the right. It was up for a number of months before being taken down. Too bad it can’t be proven, because you all seem to believe whatever you want to believe and think that whatever can’t be proven unequivocally must be a lie.

  39. #139
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:01 pm, orlandocajun said:

    You just can’t buy conservative support like this. When your opponent is in the process of digging their own grave, don’t interrupt!

    I hope that this guy is available in 2012.

  40. #140
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:03 pm, BruceB said:

    It is I, Ensign Pover, and i just threw your stinking post #49 overboard!Now what’s all this crude about no movie tonight?

  41. #141
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:06 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    It was nothing more than a collection of links

    …to moveon or democraticunderground or dailykos or – you know, the ones that are above reproach /sarc

  42. #142
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:08 pm, JT said:

    Maybe somebody told Mr. Sign Thrower that Obama’s dropping 200 million tax payer dollars per day during his visit to India.

    I am just searching for a VALID, sane, reason for the tirade.

  43. #143
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:08 pm, ThunderHawkk said:

    obama may or may not have been born in America, but he’s no American, that’s for sure.

  44. #144
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:11 pm, sbw999 said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:02 pm, granite said:

    I am not saying that comparisons cannot be made to social movements in Germany to current events today. Those comparisons might be useful as intellectual exercises in books, magazines, and documentaries. I am speaking solely about comparisons of people to Nazi’s in political discussion. It gets you nowhere, and communicates nothing that furthers debate or discussion. This is why repubs and dems alike rail against being compared to Nazi’s; the insult becomes the topic, not the original topic.

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:03 pm, txvet2 said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:48 am, sbw999 said:

    Right. Stick with “fascist”. It makes the same point and everybody thinks you’re talking about the Italians.

    Good 1. :)

  45. #145
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    It was nothing more than a collection of links showing racism on the right. It was up for a number of months before being taken down.

    I think there was some new thing instituted that wouldn’t let you have more than three outside links in a post. I seem to recall having the same issue.

  46. #146
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:15 pm, chapoutier said:

    Has she deleted all of these posts? Show me one that says that only black people in this country are racists.

    Here you go.

    I’ve come to the conclusion that the only racist people left in the United States are black people.

  47. #147
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:16 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    I am just searching for a VALID, sane, reason for the tirade.

    My 2nd thought was ‘drugs’.

  48. #148
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:16 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    I think there was some new thing instituted that wouldn’t let you have more than three outside links in a post. I seem to recall having the same issue.

    Are you saying that Michelle Malkin did not make a concerted attempt to whitewash her comments of links she didn’t like? Don’t burst my outrage bubble, man.

  49. #149
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:17 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Red State Skeptic said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 11:04 am, J.J. Sefton said:

    Listen up, fool. I have watched the Glenn Beck program almost every day for the past year and half. I have NEVER seen any racist comments at all. NEVER.

    I was referring to his comparing the Democrats to Nazis.

    And ….you are referring to perhaps the cover of Arguing with Idiots?

    If you are… try again. That’s not a Nazi uniform.

  50. #150
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:19 pm, John Deaux said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:11 pm, chapoutier said:
    I think there was some new thing instituted that wouldn’t let you have more than three outside links in a post. I seem to recall having the same issue.

    Funny, we haven’t heard you complain of a vast conspiracy to silence dissent. Are you not a disenfranchised commenter?

  51. #151
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:20 pm, chapoutier said:

    Funny, we haven’t heard you complain of a vast conspiracy to silence dissent. Are you not a disenfranchised commenter?

    I do not recall ever having a post deleted, except for Monster Thread, which was deleted en masse.

  52. #152
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:24 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    sbw999 said: It gets you nowhere, and communicates nothing that furthers debate or discussion.

    But terms like ‘brownshirts’ can indeed work well to frame the discussion when it is used to to describe the tactics of the left.

  53. #153
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:26 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Red State Skeptic said: Are you saying that Michelle Malkin did not make a concerted attempt to whitewash her comments of links she didn’t like?

    LGM?

  54. #154
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:27 pm, Mister P said:

    Growing up in Chicago I can tell you what racism is. It is paternalism of liberals treating all blacks as children. It has done more to harm African Americans than anything else could have. We still see the race baiters today like Al Sharpton, talking about Clarence Thomas not being the “right” kind of Negro. Any attempt to keep a race in a nice little partisan box is racist. It is Reid saying he can’t understand why Hispanics would vote Republican. It is Obama saying that the Republicans are the enemy of Hispanics. It is also MSNBC saying the tea party is all white.

    The Dems have tried to continually divide this country into races and classes, so that they can tell us what to do and how to live. We are tired of the lies and arrogance. Chap and RS should be praising the Republicans for all the minority candidates in primarily white districts, but their arrogance and condescension would never allow it. It does not fit the progressive meme.

  55. #155
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:27 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Who the f%$# cares about posts from another thread? This column is about that crazy dude in the video and shoes!

  56. #156
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:32 pm, sbw999 said:

    Danceswithdachshunds said:

    sbw999 said: It gets you nowhere, and communicates nothing that furthers debate or discussion.

    But terms like ‘brownshirts’ can indeed work well to frame the discussion when it is used to to describe the tactics of the left.

    How so? It is associated with Nazi Germany, and I’m sure if I searched it I would find plenty of references by Dems about conservatives calling us “brownshirts”. If you want to describe the tactics of the left, then describe the tactics. All I’m saying is that if we are ever going to again be able to discuss issues in this Country without the anger and vitriol that is unprecedented in my lifetime (IMO), ad hominem attacks have to be avoided.

  57. #157
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:33 pm, Roland said:

    Here you go.

    I’ve come to the conclusion that the only racist people left in the United States are black people.

    BTW, there is an excellent reply to that comment you linked to here.

  58. #158
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:33 pm, J.J. Sefton said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 12:46 pm, Roland said

    Roland, when I say “limited government” I mean the classical definition which I take to be an amount that is enough to ensure the civil society and to prevent anarchy. And the Federal government should be, as intended by the framers, subservient to the states and to the people. Secure the borders, defend the country, engage in foreign policy issues and deliver the mail.

    The rest is left to the people.

  59. #159
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:36 pm, rambler said:

    The sign attacking dude is letting out his inner thug. We will be seeing more and more of this as the wounded and exposed progressives see what they have worked so hard to achieve, slip through their fingers. All the dictator-wanta-bees have stored up enough energy for their temper tantrums to last for a while. Get the popcorn, the show has begun!

  60. #160
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:37 pm, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    Moments like this are why everyone should be armed with a video camera.

    There is no better way to show the world the real cockroaches of the left than to let everyone see the real democrat party that Keith and Rachel can’t seem to find anywhere.

    Keep up the good work.

  61. #161
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:40 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:03 pm, BruceB said:
    It is I, Ensign Pover, and i just threw your stinking post #49 overboard!Now what’s all this crude about no movie tonight?

    You’ve absorbed too much fulminate of mercury, I’m sure you meant Ensign Pulver. Still, anything from Mr. Roberts is more than welcome .

  62. #162
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:45 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Considering this guy’s vile behavior over a white candidate I don’t want to think about what’s might happen in about two years if I have a Sarah Palin sign in my front yard.

  63. #163
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:48 pm, spaceycakes said:

    …if you listen to the video backwards, you can definitely hear the deranged man say ‘macaca’

  64. #164
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:51 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Mister P said: The Dems have tried to continually divide this country into races and classes…

    and sexes and preferences and incomes and ages and educations and religions and …

  65. #165
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:58 pm, Flyoverman said:

    He needs a hug and a cookie.

  66. #166
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 2:05 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    O

    n November 2nd, 2010 at 1:20 pm, chapoutier said:

    I do not recall ever having a post deleted, except for Monster Thread, which was deleted en masse.

    Me either, and I have posted a couple of opinions that I know our benevolent hostess does not share. I do try to be respectful when I disagree, and when I think I’m on the edge of turning into a deranged single-issue loony I leave the page for a little while….

  67. #167
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 2:07 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    Is it racist to ask why the cop didn’t arrest the guy who was tearing down the signs?

  68. #168
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 2:08 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    chapoutier said:

    Has she deleted all of these posts? Show me one that says that only black people in this country are racists.

    Here you go.

    I wasn’t asking you.

  69. #169
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 2:09 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    I do not recall ever having a post deleted, except for Monster Thread, which was deleted en masse.

    I miss Monster Thread. (sniff)

  70. #170
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 2:20 pm, michele hampton said:

    I thought Obama took care of all of this when he got elected…I guess not. How sad and scary we have come to this in the streets of America. Elections matter!

  71. #171
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 2:25 pm, chapoutier said:

    I thought Obama took care of all of this when he got elected…I guess not. How sad and scary we have come to this in the streets of America. Elections matter!

    NThe only ones claiming that he could were idiots on the left and the only ones claiming that he claimed he would are idiots on the right.

  72. #172
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 2:26 pm, chapoutier said:

    Try that again…

    The only ones claiming that he could were idiots on the left and the only ones claiming that he claimed he would are idiots on the right.

  73. #173
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 2:29 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    A zero liability voter acting stupidly and predictably….

  74. #174
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 2:44 pm, Beukeboom said:

    According to the MSM it really didn’t happpen.

  75. #175
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 2:58 pm, Bogtrotter said:

    The democrat base in action. I am REALLY surprised the guy had enough Self-control to keep his distance during the encounter. I expected him to totally lose it at any moment. I got a big kick out of the person comment to him that they “voted for the “white half” regarding Obama. And I am not a bit surprised that the MSM is not running this video/story.

    Thank God it’s election day and the nightmere will soon be over.

  76. #176
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 3:11 pm, Roland said:

    Roland, when I say “limited government” I mean the classical definition which I take to be an amount that is enough to ensure the civil society and to prevent anarchy. ….

    JJ,

    I have a slightly more expansive view of the role of the federal government, although I oppose any expansion beyond what you’ve given unless accompanied by a Constitutional Amendment.

    Also, reasonable people can disagree about what constitutes “enough to ensure the civil society and to prevent anarchy.”

  77. #177
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 3:29 pm, Trollman said:

    So… any predictions before the results start coming in?

    I’m predicting the GOP picks up 80 seats in the House, and we get to 51 seats in the Senate.

    Yes, I’m an optimist. :)

  78. #178
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 3:53 pm, tbear44 said:

    Just got back from voting in Alaska. Lisa M’s name was not on the ballot and there is no list of write in candidates. Sweet.

  79. #179
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 3:56 pm, William said:

    Vandalism, destruction of property, tresspassing, terrorist threats, racism, bigotry, hate speech, abridgement of free speech and free expression …

    Just a few of the violations committed by those thugs.

    Now, what would have happened had a mixed martial arts fighter kicked those thugs asses all over the neighborhood?

    They have sh#$ for brains, so, had those attacked beat their butts they would have ended up with brain damage.

    Nevertheless, had they victims defended themselves here is the call that all would hear from the perpetrators:

    RACISM!!!!!

  80. #180
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 4:03 pm, RedDog said:

    This is terrifying: Herr Soros on the move…

    Soros’ Media Empire: When Elections Fail, Turn to Public Propaganda Journalism
    Posted by Liberty Chick Nov 2nd 2010 at 8:12 am

    …it only takes but one glance at the partial portfolio above of media outlets that Soros is funding to realize that this is about far more than good-hearted philanthropy. This is empire building in progress. And I haven’t even included the think tanks and advocacy organizations yet. The bigger this gets, the more we can expect to see of the lies from the left, the story manipulations, the attempts to undermine this very website, the boycotts and the assaults on free speech. After all, their new media empire is their new hope for a progressive America. Forget about voter fraud from now on, they’ve given up on elections. They’re moving on to propaganda journalism. We’re seeing it already, and this is just the beginning. As Soros himself would say, it’s Newspeak.

    Stay tuned for the full series on the Soros Media Empire.

  81. #181
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 4:05 pm, MTConservative said:

    The sign-ripping thug is just one more example of the tolerant left. I’m convinced. Are you?

  82. #182
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 4:15 pm, sbw999 said:

    Just voted. For those of us (which is most of us) who cannot buy influence, and dont have the ear of any politicians, it is that simple act which is my way of sticking my middle finger up in the air to all democrats, and saying “YOU’RE FIRED!!!” And it sure felt gooooodddddddd.

  83. #183
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 4:32 pm, txvet2 said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 4:03 pm, RedDog said:

    What are they going to do that CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, CNBC, and MSNBC, among others don’t already do? Drive more viewers to Fox?

  84. #184
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 4:32 pm, tbear44 said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 4:15 pm, sbw999 said:

    Yes, it did. It felt REALLY good!

  85. #185
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 4:36 pm, right_on said:

    a supporter of Democrat congressional candidate Tom Perriello and Barack Obama demonstrates a little, ahem, “insane rage”

    Sorry….wrong! This is not insane rage. This is everyday inner-city drama…one might say, is typical of the entitlement, yea, racist mindset.

    That’s a reason so many dissaffected members of the black community are attracted to Islam. They are both perpetually outraged.

    You gotta give brotha-man a break…it’s all he (and, they,) know.

  86. #186
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 4:45 pm, spaceycakes said:

    is this thing on?

  87. #187
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 5:31 pm, misterbee241 said:

    Wow, he threw a real Behar fit.

  88. #188
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 5:33 pm, misterbee241 said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 4:15 pm, sbw999 said:

    Just voted. For those of us (which is most of us) who cannot buy influence, and dont have the ear of any politicians, it is that simple act which is my way of sticking my middle finger up in the air to all democrats, and saying “YOU’RE FIRED!!!” And it sure felt gooooodddddddd.

    If Michelle had a “like” button a la facebook, I’d click this one.

  89. #189
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 5:34 pm, ddhinnyc said:

    Last night Ed Schultz and one of his idiot Democrat friends who is running for Congress complained that all Republicans do is get violent and hit people. LOL

  90. #190
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 5:38 pm, spaceycakes said:

    complained that all Republicans do is get violent and hit people. LOL

    but does he have video?

  91. #191
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 6:10 pm, zorro said:

    On November 2nd, 2010 at 1:48 pm, spaceycakes said:

    …if you listen to the video backwards, you can definitely hear the deranged man say ‘macaca’

    Ha! Love it.

    Again, excellent coverage Michelle.

  92. #192
    On November 2nd, 2010 at 6:45 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    spaceycakes said:

    complained that all Republicans do is get violent and hit people. LOL

    but does he have video?

    It was deleted and that’s his proof!

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook