Harry Reid’s non-English-speaking voting bloc

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 4, 2010 09:43 AM

Nothing smells right about Harry Reid.

His re-election on Tuesday has deepened the stench. Theories are flying left and right to explain the failure of polls that had consistently showed Sharron Angle ahead.

The New York Times points to Latinos as Reid’s hidden salvation. And not just any Latinos. It was apparently Latinos who prefer not to speak English who curiously turned out in droves for Reid.

Chew on this:

I riffed a little bit last night on why the public polls might have been wrong in Nevada; I speculated, for instance, that the fact that Mr. Reid is the sort of candidate whom one votes for unenthusiastically might have skewed the turnout models.

There is another theory, however, which was proposed to me last night by Matt Barreto of the polling firm Latino Decisions.

“There is one overarching reason why the polls were wrong in Nevada,” Mr. Barreto wrote in an e-mail to FiveThirtyEight. “The Latino vote.”

His firm, which conducts interviews in both English and Spanish, had found that Latino voters — somewhat against the conventional wisdom — were relatively engaged by this election and for the most part were going to vote Democratic. Mr. Barreto also found that Latino voters who prefer to speak Spanish — about 40 percent of Latino voters in California meet this description, he told me — are particularly likely to vote Democratic. Pollsters who don’t conduct bilingual interviewing at all, or who make it cumbersome for the respondent to take the poll in Spanish, may be missing these voters.

More from Newsweek:

According to election-eve polling and analysis by Latino Decisions, a surveying firm, Hispanics chose Reid over Angle 90 percent to 8 percent—an astounding margin. CNN’s exit polls showed a significantly smaller spread, with Reid winning 68 percent to Angle’s 30 percent. But Latino Decisions argues that exit-polling methodology is typically inaccurate at measuring voting by Hispanics and other subgroups. The firm also contends that exit polls tend to lowball Latino turnout. Still, CNN’s figures show that Hispanics constituted 15 percent of the Nevada electorate this year, a notable increase over the last midterm cycle, in 2006, when they made up 12 percent. “Latinos certainly saved Harry Reid,” says Gary Segura, a member of Latino Decisions and a professor at Stanford University.

So, the least assimilated, non-English-speaking voters turned out for an open-borders Democrat panderer whose top priorities this lame-duck session including passing the illegal alien DREAM Act student bailout.

Hmmmmmmm.

If only we could clone newly-elected, voter fraud-fighting Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach and send him to Searchlight.

Reid’s rescuers miraculously appeared after a concerted effort by the Left to stoke the ire of shamnesty supporters and employ illegal aliens as canvassers — not to mention the White House directive from President Obama to Latinos on Univision to “punish our enemies” for their opposition to lax immigration policies.

Reid infamously race-baited in August, taunting Hispanic conservatives as aberrations. And Reid’s non-English-speaking voting bloc surfaced after a massive push by his Purple-Shirted allies at the SEIU and other radical prog groups to get them to the polls. From October 27 on the SEIU website:

If that Pew Hispanic poll from August is still driving your analysis of the Latino vote, you might want to get up to speed: Latino Decisions’ latest tracking poll, released yesterday, shows that the number of Latino registered voters who say they are “almost certain” to show up at the polls is now 75.1% — a full 10% higher than it was four weeks ago, according to previous Latino Decisions research.

…and $5.4 million is going toward making sure it keeps climbing. Last week, a number of national and local organizations highlighted their efforts to turn out the immigrant and Latino vote. Democracia USA, the Campaign for Community Change and the We Are America Alliance, among others, combined forces to announce a $5.4 million nationwide effort. They are targeting over a million Latino, Asian and immigrant voters in twenty-three states.

No wonder they are fighting so hard to sabotage voter ID/proof-of-citizenship requirements.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:06 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Compare and Contrast…

    U.S. politicians may dream of one day sinking into the presidential bed aboard Air Force One. David Cameron, returning last night from his first trip to the U.S. as British prime minister, took a business-class seat on board a scheduled British Airways flight.

    Cameron, trying to cut Britain’s deficit, its largest since World War II, is scaling back on the chartered jets his predecessors used for overseas travel and told his staff to book him on regular flights. Yesterday he traveled to New York from Washington on Amtrak’s Acela train.

    “We have got a lot of money to save,” the prime minister told ABC News July 20. “We’ve got a very big budget deficit, so we can’t go spending money on executive planes, sadly.”

    While Cameron’s office estimates it is saving several hundred thousand pounds by forgoing chartered jets, that isn’t the only consideration. His party fought the May 6 general election arguing “We’re all in this together.”

  2. #102
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:08 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Also, I received this email from someone I know personally whose Nevada relative reported to them:

    …the news that voting problems are occurring in Nevada is true; [person X] ([person Y]‘s wife) actually had it happen to her that Harry Reid’s name was already checked on her computer ballot when she went to vote. She complained to the folks at the polling area, who switched her to a booth that worked. Now they had the FBI come to their house and interview her for a half hour about the incident. So we’ll see what happens in that race.

    I’m very curious what the FBI is going to do about it.

  3. #103
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:09 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    On November 4th, 2010 at 10:06 am, Patronedheart said:

    P.S.
    If we did require everyone to know English before they became a citizen, it sure would make it a lot easier to identify people who are here illegally, no?

    Requirements for US Citizenship

    Language

    Applicants for naturalization must be able to read, write, speak, and understand words in ordinary usage in the English language. Applicants exempt from this requirement are those who on the date of filing:

    * have been residing in the United States subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence for at least 15 years and are over 55 years of age;
    *have been residing in the United States subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence for at least 20 years and are over 50 years of age; or
    * have a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, where the impairment affects the applicant’s ability to learn English.

  4. #104
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:09 pm, chapoutier said:

    I am going to put a news article in here…and again, I apologize, but this is really upsetting me.

    Doug already posted about a few days ago this and pretty much everyone was in agreement that the article is totally bunk. No way it is remotely true.

  5. #105
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:09 pm, Mister P said:

    What, no more 747s for Pelosi? BTW: A Republican is now 2nd in the secession line.

  6. #106
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:12 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    I have with Jerry Brown and Boxer winning re-election in California, where libs like them (particularly Boxer who has been in office) are responsible for Cal’s sorry predicament. How on earth can they be put back in office; yet they were?

    Perhaps the GOP candidates were viewed as: “not conservative enough”, “rich Republican CEOs who were “buying” votes”, “responsible for laying off workers and sending jobs overseas”, “no “experience” in polictal
    office”.

    An indoctrinated view perpetuated by the dems and their public school and media lackeys that Republicans are going to slash taxes for their multimillionaire friends and corporation, slash spending on care for the less fortunate immigrants, elderly, children,and animals and destroy our natural resources, “Oh, heck, the Dems are responsible for creating this mess, vote for them and they can take full responsibility for the states’ demise.”

    I could go on and on. Oh, yes, and a state GOP organization that is just about as ineffective as an organization can be and still be considered an organization. I often think the CA GOP should appear with the missing children on those posters and milk cartons.

  7. #107
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:13 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:02 pm, txvet2 said:
    As I said the other day, one of the first things the new Congress should cut is the White House budget.

    What budget? Maybe the reason they didn’t pass a budget this year is because Obama would spend the entire year’s budget on this trip to India.

    It is not my intention to hijack this thread…so back to topic!! I just hope MM will focus on this India trip some time…there will probably be lots of interesting comments!

  8. #108
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:14 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    we MUST go after these pensions of government workers. You can’t expect people in the private sector to have to wait till 70 for SSN, yet have government workers retire at 80 percent of salary at 55. We should move all these pensions to SSN and to 401Ks.

    Exactly.

  9. #109
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:16 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Doug already posted about a few days ago this and pretty much everyone was in agreement that the article is totally bunk. No way it is remotely true.

    If that is the case, Chap, then why is Drudge headlining it again today? I have always thought Drudge was quite thorough in checking before they posted their items. Also, Rush mentioned it the other day. He checks his sources pretty carefully too. So who says it is false??

  10. #110
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:16 pm, swede said:

    happyscrapper said:
    I am going to go completely off-topic and hope MM won’t get mad at me!! Why isn’t anyone covering this unbelievable trip Obama is taking to India???

    Well, Michelle Bachman, for one, is talking about it. She calls it “over the top”. My guess is it will pop up on O’Reilly or Hannity tonight. Maybe Baier’s panel. Would be entertaining to hear Krauthammer’s take.

    BTW, as long as we’re OT, I’m not a big Beck fan, but if you haven’t seen the clip of Beck et al yucking it up yesterday, it’s a riot! Laughed hard – first time in a loooong time.

    Via rightscoop – Glen Beck: Happy days are here again!

  11. #111
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:18 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Maybe the reason they didn’t pass a budget this year is because Obama would spend the entire year’s budget on this trip to India.

    Anderson Cooper almost had a stroke yesterday interviewing Michele Bachmann asking her about cutting Social Security, and she turned it around and mentioned the trip to India. She mentioned the $200 million and he asked her where she got the number and she almost winked when she said it was in the press. He practically got spittle on the camera lens asking her if she believed everything she read in the press. He fumed before commercial that she wouldn’t answer his question but I think she was tweaking him. She must have laughed all the way home.

  12. #112
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:19 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Mister P said:

    What, no more 747s for Pelosi? BTW: A Republican is now 2nd in the secession line.

    You forgot TOTUS!

  13. #113
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:21 pm, chapoutier said:

    If that is the case, Chap, then why is Drudge headlining it again today? I have always thought Drudge was quite thorough in checking before they posted their items.

    You are kidding, right? Drudge slaps up there whatever headline is going to generate the most page views. I sometimes doubt whether he actually finishes the whole article.

    The ONLY source for that absurd $200 million number is some unnamed “Indian official” quoted in some obscure Indian news outlet. Yet the usual suspects (see Drudge, Bachmann, Doug Powers, apparently) have run with it, never for once pausing to think or question it.

  14. #114
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:21 pm, Roland said:

    Still a head scratcher. You have 15% unemployment in that State, and they still elect a tax and spend liar like Reid. Same disconnect that I have with Jerry Brown and Boxer winning re-election in California, where libs like them (particularly Boxer who has been in office) are responsible for Cal’s sorry predicament. How on earth can they be put back in office; yet they were?

    Ahnold was a Republican, and the Governor, so the CA voter blamed the Republicans.

    Never mind the legislature they gave him to work with was overwhelmingly Democrat, and that the voters turned down all of the Propositions he put on the ballot after getting elected. It was all the fault of those dirty Republicans.

    Especially George W. Bush, of course. And that darned 2/3 rule that was keeping the Democrat legislature from raising already sky high taxes instead of cutting spending to balance the budgets.

    Now they’ve ‘fixed’ all that, and things have gotten so bad they just might get better now even with the ‘fixing,’ for a year or two, anyway, thereby ‘proving’ to the idiots they were correct.

    You can’t fix stupid, and the average California voter is as dumb as a bag of hammers.

  15. #115
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:22 pm, Mister P said:

    The aggregates of the polls were pretty good, but there was a lot of variance from poll to poll.
    For OR-4, which was ultimately won 51.5 to 46, the aggregate said 44.1 to 43.5 but the last two polls out of there had a +12D and a +10 R. The +10R was landline only. Don’t know about the +12.
    For governor, the aggregates indeed ended up having them within .8% of each other, but again, with a lot of variance. The last 4 polls had +7D, +3R, +3R and +4D, so none of them were particularly close, but ended up canceling each other out in the middle.

    Well generally the margin of error is 3 percent, and that is for any given poll, and not for a mix of polls with different sources. But from by little hovel in central oregon I saw Huffman get about 41 percent of the vote, as predicted. Walden get 78 percent of the vote as expected, Dudley gets 49 percent of the vote as expected. We are a red area so Republicans won the state house and senate just about as predicted. But I certainly can’t speak for the races in the Willamette valley.

    We are probably an outlier. We don’t get good reception on our mobile phones, so to get ahold of us you must call our land line. But we have caller ID, and if we don’t know the caller, we don’t answer the phone.

  16. #116
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:22 pm, chapoutier said:

    Exactly.

    I assume we are including the military in that as well? Or are they exempt from any and all discussions about pension reform (or any budget scrutiny for that matter)?

  17. #117
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:22 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I’m very curious what the FBI is going to do about it.

    Make sure:

    1: She only speaks Spanish

    or

    2: Is an SEIU member.

    Just guessing.

    Actually i like the FBI and feel sorry for them that people like Holder can influence our Justice System.

  18. #118
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:23 pm, By Choice said:

    As they say ‘it aint over til its over” and it’s not in AZ CD7 and CD8

    Attorney’s Needed To Monitor Vote Counting In Southern AZ: In CD8, Jesse Kelly is only a
    couple of thousand of votes behind Gabby Giffords. There are still thousand of votes to be counted in this race. Based on the Party’s analysis of the uncounted votes in CD8, a large majority of the outstanding vote are for Jesse Kelly. Accordingly, Jesse Kelly can still win the race but we need help to ensure that ballots are counted accurately. Southern Arizona has a history of problems of losing ballots and shady vote counting procedures so we need attorney’s
    to make sure that vote count is above board. If you are interested in traveling to Southern Arizona for a few days to help monitor the counting of votes in Pima, Cochise, or Santa Cruz counties contact Walt Opaska at walter.opaska@bryancave.com or call him at 602-206-0017.

    Ballots yet to be counted: PHOENIX (AP) – Election officials across Arizona have an estimated 374,000 early and provisional ballots still to count from Tuesday’s general election. Most of those ballots are in Maricopa County. The state’s largest county by population has nearly 219,000 early
    ballots and 55,000 provisional ballots still to count. Pima County has about 47,000 outstanding ballots, including more than 34,000 early ballots. The counts must be done by Nov. 12.

    35,000 early ballots still need to be verified then counted in CD8 http://www.kold.com/Global/story.asp?S=13438117&Call=Email&Format=HTML

    Provisional and early ballots could affect key Pima County races http://www.kold.com/Global/story.asp?S=13441351&Call=Email&Format=HTML

    So those fake MiFamilia Vota registrations may get thrown out and Ruth McClung and Jesse Kelly will defeat the socialists Raul boycott Grijalva and Gabby PelosiGiffords…… it could happen!!!

  19. #119
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:24 pm, Mister P said:

    Ahnold was a Republican, and the Governor, so the CA voter blamed the Republicans.

    This explains the problems that RINOS create.

  20. #120
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:25 pm, Mister P said:

    o those fake MiFamilia Vota registrations may get thrown out and Ruth McClung and Jesse Kelly will defeat the socialists Raul boycott Grijalva and Gabby PelosiGiffords…… it could happen!!!

    Would love seeing that. We need a rocket scientist in congress.

  21. #121
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:28 pm, Mister P said:

    You forgot TOTUS!

    What’s a TOTUS?

  22. #122
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:29 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Would love seeing that. We need a rocket scientist in congress.

    Me too, and more small business owners, and far, far fewer lawyers and ivy leaguers.

  23. #123
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:29 pm, Mister P said:

    Anderson Cooper almost had a stroke yesterday interviewing Michele Bachmann asking her about cutting Social Security, and she turned it around and mentioned the trip to India.

    Did she ask what he had meant by “Teabagger” and what his experience of teabagging was?

  24. #124
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:29 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Or are they exempt from any and all discussions about pension reform (or any budget scrutiny for that matter)?

    No one is exempt from the discussion. On the other hand, when being a Federal Trade Commission attorney gets paid as little as a Private, or when the job is as dangerous as a couple of tours of Afghanistan, I’ll be more sympathetic…especially since national defense is an actual duty of the government.

    I don’t have the figures handy, but I seem to recall that the public sector now pays more than the private sector. Including necessary but hugely overpaid positions like rubbish collector.

  25. #125
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:31 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    What’s a TOTUS?

    The Teleprompter of the United States. Next in line. Then Biden, then Bachmann, oops I mean Boehner.

  26. #126
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:33 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Did she ask what he had meant by “Teabagger” and what his experience of teabagging was?

    Actually, she should have had a cup of tea, and every time he asked a question, she could have paused, held it up and dunked the teabag a couple of times…it would have been awesome.

  27. #127
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:33 pm, CJ said:

    On November 4th, 2010 at 12:53 pm, chapoutier said:

    No, that would be jury duty. I have never been called. And I think it would be interesting. Not that I would likely make it through voir dire.

    I’ve gotten summons 4 times, most recently in 2003 (local court), 2004 (local court) and 2006 (Federal court). Served the first time (years ago), but took deferrals for the most recent 3 because of my son’s health issues. (I sent in his school attendence record with my letter, and they agreed I wasn’t a good candidate at this time.)

    I should be due for another summons here soon, so if you get yourself a CJ id, I’ll let you have my slot. (The irony is that my husband has never been summoned. I don’t know why I’m the lucky one.)

  28. #128
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:33 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Doug Powers just put up a new thread about Obama’s trip. See you there. Sorry for the interruption!! I really am! :evil:

  29. #129
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:36 pm, Mister P said:

    The Teleprompter of the United States. Next in line. Then Biden, then Bachmann, oops I mean Boehner.

    That is funny! I like Biden better without the TOTUS. Bachmann will have a great day returning to the House and seeing Pelosi trying to run things. The worm is turning.

  30. #130
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:38 pm, Mister P said:

    CJ, I love jury duty. It is the least we can do as citizens. I had the fun of being the 1 vs 11 on a conviction, and eventually turn it into a not guilty. Great experience.

  31. #131
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:43 pm, Roland said:

    This explains the problems that RINOS create.

    In Ahnold’s defense, no Governor could have done anything with the voters spitting on his attempts to fix the state just shortly after the voters elected him.

    Your point is a good one in this case, though, because if the Idiot California Voter just elects celebrity Republicans as figureheads they can later blame for the consequences of the acts of the Democrats, it would be better to just give them all Democrats and to Hell with them.

    However, in the case of Whitman’s defeat, the Idiot California Voter also just removed the 2/3 rule on passing budgets, so the only thing that might have stood in the way of massive tax increases would have been the threat of a veto by the Governor.

    That threat is gone. Now taxes will soar.

  32. #132
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:44 pm, CJ said:

    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:38 pm, Mister P said:

    CJ, I love jury duty. It is the least we can do as citizens. I had the fun of being the 1 vs 11 on a conviction, and eventually turn it into a not guilty. Great experience.

    I enjoyed it, too. We had 12 reasonable people from very disparate backgrounds all trying to see that the right thing was done.

    I’d do it again, but later, when my son is older. At the rate I get called, I’ll probably get another chance — or 6 or 7 …

  33. #133
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:51 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    That threat is gone. Now taxes will soar.

    And the exodus of taxpayers and businesses out of CA will excellerate.

  34. #134
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:51 pm, T-Bone said:

    Who can I sue? If illegals are voting in any election, I am being disenfranchised. This is a big effing deal. My vote is very important to me. To see it washed away by an illegal who does not have to prove anything is way too easy. I should be able to protect my rights. We need a new civil rights march. We like people who are not like ourselves but not criminals that violate my rights as a citizen.

    My Dream act would be to shut off all jobs to illegals. You are not here legally to work, then you can’t work. What a concept. If I don’t pay my taxes, the IRS is all over me. Do that to business that hire illegals. Profiling? Hey, I am getting profiled by having my vote cancelled. My rights count just as much as yours.

  35. #135
    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:58 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
  36. #136
    On November 4th, 2010 at 3:03 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:58 pm, ITookTheRedPill said

    “Nothing to see here, folks. Pay no attention to those people in purple shirts working on those machines, just doing their jobs. Move along now.”

  37. #137
    On November 4th, 2010 at 3:06 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Who can I sue? If illegals are voting in any election, I am being disenfranchised. This is a big effing deal.

    As long as the DOJ is being run by Holder, and your state’s AG, judges, and politicians are ovewhelmingly dems and leftsists, you’ll get nowhere. They deem illegal voting an exclusive Dem voting bloc to be fiercely defended.

  38. #138
    On November 4th, 2010 at 3:19 pm, jrgdds said:

    Nothing smells right about Harry Reid.

    A lot of things don’t smell right…

  39. #139
    On November 4th, 2010 at 3:21 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On November 4th, 2010 at 2:51 pm, T-Bone said:

    Who can I sue? If illegals are voting in any election, I am being disenfranchised.

    Hold up, how did we conclude that illegal aliens are voting?

  40. #140
    On November 4th, 2010 at 3:25 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    how did we conclude that illegal aliens are voting?

    No one has concluded anything. We’re engaging in our favorite pastime: Speculating. Care to join in?

  41. #141
    On November 4th, 2010 at 3:28 pm, CJ said:

    Nothing smells right about Harry Reid.

    BTW, how do we know it’s Harry Reid that smells? Maybe it’s just those stinky tourists again.

  42. #142
    On November 4th, 2010 at 3:56 pm, Mister P said:

    They are talking about 3600 voters in Multnomah county (near Portland), who had no id or proof of citizenship at all.

  43. #143
    On November 4th, 2010 at 3:57 pm, Mister P said:

    Hold up, how did we conclude that illegal aliens are voting?

    He used the word IF.

  44. #144
    On November 4th, 2010 at 4:04 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    On November 4th, 2010 at 3:25 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    No one has concluded anything. We’re engaging in our favorite pastime: Speculating. Care to join in?

    Thanks for the offer. If skinny jeans don’t go out of fashion soon, I don’t know what I’m going to do with myself. Hideous!

  45. #145
    On November 4th, 2010 at 4:18 pm, jrgdds said:

    On November 4th, 2010 at 3:56 pm, Mister P said:

    They are talking about 3600 voters in Multnomah county (near Portland), who had no id or proof of citizenship at all.

    Throw in Hillsboro,Cornelius,McMinnville, and Beaverton(home of the city sponsored Mexican Independence day celebration and no Fourth of July celebration), and there you go-Stolen Election.

    Illegals with ID will continue to vote until it’s time to renew their Oregon licenses with the new proof of citizenship requirements.

  46. #146
    On November 4th, 2010 at 5:16 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Part of the reason the Democrats needed Harry Reid to win “by any means necessary” was because this one race is a HUGE role in driving the narrative.

    A Reid loss would mean the second consecutive Democratic Senate Majority Leader to lose re-election.

    Tom Daschle was majority leader from June 6, 2001 – January 3, 2003 (when Republicans took the majority), and he lost his re-election campaign in 2004. Now, in 2010, polls showed Reid losing his re-election campaign.

    However, Harry “muchas gracias” Reid’s stolen election is now spun as a major defeat for Jim DeMint!

    “While Republicans and the Tea Party had a stellar night it’s clear that DeMint-style tactics resulted in Republicans losing several key Senate races including Nevada. These Democratic wins mean votes in support of all the things Republicans and the Tea Party oppose. DeMint’s tactics backfired,” accused one senior Senate GOP leadership aide…

  47. #147
    On November 4th, 2010 at 6:59 pm, rocketman said:

    ***
    I hope that among the $200 million being spent on Comrade Obama’s(PBUH) India trip are enough bucks for 20 Marine Corps snipers with M14′s, lots of rounds, and suitable anti-tank weapons.
    ***
    I’m not a big Messiah fan–but that’s a very tough neighborhood. High tech aircraft carriers are cool–but some low tech can help keep him safe there. I want to see him voted out of office in the November 2012 elections–and can’t wait to see the dejected entourage leaving the White House in January 2013 as the Palins move in.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  48. #148
    On November 4th, 2010 at 8:57 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On November 4th, 2010 at 1:53 pm, chapoutier said:
    This is about how it would go:

    Attorney: Sir, what is your occupation?
    Me: Lawyer.
    Attorney: Thank you. You are excused.

    Ha! At first quick glance I thought they excused you because you were talking like Tarzan, “Me lawyer, you Jane” then I saw your colon, er.. um.. you know what I mean! :shock:

  49. #149
    On November 4th, 2010 at 9:30 pm, frontierguy said:

    You can’t fix stupid, and the average California voter is as dumb as a bag of hammers.

    Roland, you ain’t a lying. California voters fall for pretty language everytime. That is why Prop 25, giving a simple majority budget passing power, was passed. The California voter fell for the, if the budget is not passed, the legislators don’t get paid, line. They failed to realize that as 75% of Cali’s govt is democrat, they just gave these idiots a free pass to write whatever budget they want to, no matter how bloated, paying off the unions with money that will never materialize. Now that the green building codes have been passed, no more building here, no more new business, no more new anything. California will be bankrupt. Brown will be laughing all the way to his tax sheltered mansion anywhere but here.

    To the tune of California knows how to party:

    California, is mighty stupid…
    California, your mighty stupid…
    In the city of San Francisco,
    In the city of Los Angeles,
    In the city of Sacramento
    they keep a spending,
    the creditors no longer cover them….
    doo do do do do do do…

  50. #150
    On November 5th, 2010 at 11:40 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Hold up, how did we conclude that illegal aliens are voting?

    Oh, I’m sure NONE of them did.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook