DREAM Act scorecard: Target Democrats on the fence or leaning no; Plus: The cowardly kiddie human shield strategy

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 18, 2010 10:45 AM

I posted the scorecard and phone numbers for DREAM Act Senate GOP fence-sitters earlier this morning.

Now, here’s a look at a few of the key Democrat Senate fence-sitters and those leaning no on the stand-alone vote.

Remember: Your voices and your calls count.

SEN. JIM WEBB OF VIRGINIA 202-224-4024; 703-573-7090. Staff says “he hasn’t made a public statement.”

SEN. KENT CONRAD OF NORTH DAKOTA 202-224-2043; 701-258-4648. Staff says “he hasn’t released a statement.” Conrad has voted against the DREAM Act in the past.

SEN. BYRON DORGAN OF NORTH DAKOTA 202 224-2551. He voted against the DREAM Act in the past. Staff says he “hasn’t taken a public position.”

SEN. MARK PRYOR OF ARKANSAS 202-224-2353; 501-324-6336. He voted no on the DREAM Act cloture vote in September. Staff says he is “likely” to vote no again, though he hasn’t made an official public statement yet.

SEN. JON TESTER OF MONTANA 202 224-2644. Staff says he has voted against the DREAM Act in the past and “he will probably vote against any bill that has amnesty in it.”

SEN. MAX BAUCUS OF MONTANA 202-224-2651. He has opposed the DREAM Act in the past and is a “likely no” again in this session.

SEN. CLAIRE MCCASKILL OF MISSOURI 202-224-6154. She opposed the DREAM Act in the past and staff says she has made no statement changing her position otherwise.

***

Note the flip-flopper:

SEN. MARY LANDRIEU OF LOUISIANA 202-224-5824. She voted against the DREAM Act in the past, but staff said this morning she now supports it.

***

Here we go again. The cowardly Democrats are reportedly going to employ their trademark kiddie human shield strategy to try and pressure wavering Democrats.

Via NumbersUSA:

According to a letter written by Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.), House Democratic Leadership is thinking of attaching the DREAM Act Amnesty bill to an immigration-related bill he introduced. The Help HAITI Act would allow the Department of Homeland Security to offer permanent residency to orphaned children who came to the United States after the devastating earthquake earlier this year.

Rep. Fortenberry has earned an A-grade from NumbersUSA and is a cosponsor of four of our 5-Great Immigration Bills offered this Congress.

“I’m at a total loss. This is about helping the children in the wake of the earthquake,” Rep. Fortenberry wrote.

“After these families have opened their hearts and homes to some of the world’s most vulnerable children, this security is the least we can give them. The House of Representatives should affirm this by passing the Help HAITI Act, free of unrelated, controversial measures.”

According to Congressional Quarterly, a Capitol Hill publication, even though Rep. Fortenberry didn’t mention the DREAM Act in his letter, one of his aides said that was the controversial bill his letter referred to.

***

Yesterday, I mentioned GOP Sen. Jeff Sessions’ alert on the DREAM Act dangers. Here is the full memo. Spread the word and make sure your Senators know where you stand.

Ten Things You Need To Know About S.3827, The DREAM Act

1. The DREAM Act Is NOT Limited to Children, And It Will Be Funded On the Backs Of Hard Working, Law-Abiding Americans

Proponents of the DREAM Act frequently claim the bill offers relief only to illegal alien “kids.” Incredibly, previous versions of the DREAM Act had no age limit at all, so illegal aliens of any age who satisfied the Act’s requirements—not just children—could obtain lawful permanent resident (LPR) status. In response to this criticism, S.3827 includes a requirement that aliens be under the age of 35 on the date of enactment to be eligible for LPR status. Even with this cap, many aliens would be at least 41 years old before obtaining full LPR status under the Act—hardly the “kids” the Act’s advocates keep talking about.

The DREAM Act requires that DHS/USCIS process all DREAM Act applications (applications that would require complex, multi-step adjudication) without being able to increase fees to handle processing. This mandate would require either additional Congressional appropriations, or for USCIS, a primarily fee-funded agency, to raise fees on other types of immigration benefit applications. This would unfairly spread the cost of administering the DREAM Act legalization program among applicants and petitioners who have abided by U.S. laws and force taxpayers to pay for amnesty. Taxpayers would also be on the hook for all Federal benefits the DREAM Act seeks to offer illegal aliens, including student loans and grants.

2. The DREAM Act PROVIDES SAFE HARBOR FOR ANY ALIEN, Including Criminals, From Being Removed or Deported If They Simply Submit An Application

Although DREAM Act proponents claim it will benefit only those who meet certain age, presence, and educational requirements, amazingly the Act protects ANY alien who simply submits an application for status no matter how frivolous. The bill forbids the Secretary of Homeland Security from removing “any alien who has a pending application for conditional status” under the DREAM Act—regardless of age or criminal record—providing a safe harbor for all illegal aliens. This loophole will open the floodgates for applications that could stay pending for many years or be litigated as a delay tactic to prevent the illegal aliens’ removal from the United States. The provision will further erode any chances of ending the rampant illegality and fraud in the existing system.

3. Certain Criminal Aliens Will Be Eligible For Amnesty Under The DREAM Act

Certain categories of criminal aliens will be eligible for the DREAM Act amnesty, including alien gang members and aliens with misdemeanor convictions, even DUIs. The DREAM Act allows illegal aliens guilty of the following offenses to be eligible for amnesty: alien absconders (aliens who failed to attend their removal proceedings), aliens who have engaged in voter fraud or unlawfully voted, aliens who have falsely claimed U.S. citizenship, aliens who have abused their student visas, and aliens who have committed marriage fraud. Additionally, illegal aliens who pose a public health risk, aliens who have been permanently barred from obtaining U.S. citizenship, and aliens who are likely to become a public charge are also eligible.

4. Estimates Suggest That At Least 2.1 Million Illegal Aliens Will Be Eligible For the DREAM Act Amnesty. In Reality, We Have No Idea How Many Illegal Aliens Will Apply

Section 4(d) of the DREAM Act waives all numerical limitations on green cards, and prohibits any numerical limitation on the number of aliens eligible for amnesty under its provisions. The Migration Policy Institute estimates that the DREAM Act will make approximately 2.1 million illegal aliens eligible for amnesty. It is highly likely that the number of illegal aliens receiving amnesty under the DREAM Act will be much higher than the estimated 2.1 million due to fraud and our inherent inability to accurately estimate the illegal alien population. Clearly, the message sent by the DREAM Act will be that if any young person can enter the country illegally, within 5 years, they will be placed on a path to citizenship.

5. Illegal Aliens Will Get In-State Tuition Benefits

The DREAM Act will allow illegal aliens to qualify for in-state tuition, even when it is not being offered to U.S. citizens and legally present aliens living just across state lines. Section 3 of the DREAM Act repeals Section 505 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1623) which prohibits giving education benefits to an unlawfully present individual unless that same benefit is offered to all U.S. citizens.

6. The DREAM Act Does Not Require That An Illegal Alien Finish Any Type of Degree (Vocational, Two-Year, or Bachelor’s Degree) As A Condition of Amnesty

DREAM Act supporters would have you believe that the bill is intended to benefit illegal immigrants who have graduated from high school and are on their way to earning college degrees. However, the bill is careful to ensure that illegal alien high school drop-outs will also be put on a pathway to citizenship – they simply have to get a GED and be admitted to “an institution of higher education,” defined by the Higher Education Act of 1965.

Under the Higher Education Act, an “institution of higher education” includes institutions that provide 2-year programs (community colleges) and any “school that provides not less than a 1-year program of training to prepare students for gainful employment” (a vocational school). Within 8 years of the initial grant of status, the alien must prove only that they finished 2 years of a bachelor’s degree program, not that they completed any program or earned any degree.

If the alien is unable to complete 2 years of college but can demonstrate that their removal would result in hardship to themselves or their U.S. citizen or LPR spouse, child, or parent, the education requirement can be waived altogether.

7. The DREAM Act does not require that an illegal alien serve in the military as a condition for amnesty, and There is ALREADY A Legal Process In Place For Illegal Aliens to Obtain U.S. Citizenship Through Military Service

DREAM Act supporters would have you believe that illegal aliens who don’t go to college will earn their citizenship through service in the U.S. Armed Forces. However, the bill does not require aliens to join the U.S. Armed Forces (the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard); instead it requires enlistment in the “uniformed services.” This means that aliens need only go to work for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration or Public Health Service for 2 years to get U.S. citizenship. If the alien is unable to complete 2 years in the “uniformed services,” and can demonstrate that their removal would result in hardship to themselves or their U.S. citizen or LPR spouse, child, or parent, the military service requirement can be waived altogether. Such claims will likely engender much litigation and place a huge burden on DHS.

Furthermore, under current law (10 USC § 504), the Secretary of Defense can authorize the enlistment of illegal aliens. Once enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces, under 8 USC § 1440, these illegal aliens can become naturalized citizens through expedited processing, often obtaining U.S. citizenship in six months.

8. Despite Their Current Illegal Status, DREAM Act Aliens Will Be Given All The Rights That Legal Immigrants Receive—Including The Legal Right To Sponsor Their Parents and Extended Family Members For Immigration

Under current federal law, U.S. citizens have the right to immigrate their “immediate relatives” to the U.S. without regard to numerical caps. Similarly, lawful permanent residents can immigrate their spouses and children to the U.S. as long as they retain their status. This means illegal aliens who receive amnesty under the DREAM Act will have the right to immigrate their family members—including the parents who sent for or brought them to the U.S. illegally in the first place—in unlimited numbers as soon as they become U.S. citizens (6 to 8 years after enactment) and are 21 years of age.

Additionally, amnestied aliens who become U.S. citizens will be able to petition for their adult siblings living abroad to immigrate to the U.S., further incentivizing chain migration and potentially illegal entry into the United States (for those who don’t want to wait for the petition process overseas). When an adult brother or sister receives a green card, the family (spouse and children) of the adult sibling receive green cards as well.

9. Current Illegal Aliens Will Get Federal Student Loans, Federal Work Study Programs, and Other Forms of Federal Financial Aid

Section 10 of the DREAM Act allows illegal aliens amnestied under the bill’s provisions to qualify for federal student assistance under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) in the form of federal student loans (Stafford Loans, Perkins Loans, Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loans), federal work-study programs, and other federal education services such as tutoring and counseling.

10. DHS Is Prohibited From Using the Information Provided By Illegal Aliens Whose DREAM Act Amnesty Applications Are Denied To Initiate Their Removal Proceedings or Investigate or Prosecute Fraud in the Application Process

When an illegal alien’s DREAM Act amnesty application is denied, the bill states that the alien will revert to their “previous immigration status,” which is likely illegal or deportable. The bill, however, prohibits using any of the information contained in the amnesty application (name, address, length of illegal presence that the alien admits to, etc) to initiate a removal proceeding or investigate or prosecute fraud in the application process. Thus, it will be extremely hard for DHS to remove aliens who they now know are illegally present in the U.S., because illegal aliens will be able to claim that the legal action is a product of the amnesty application, and DHS will have the nearly impossible task of proving a negative.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On November 18th, 2010 at 10:52 am, tarpon said:

    I can see 2012 from my window.

    What was it about the Secure fence act of 2006 that was so hard to understand? And what is being done with the fence today?

    Need more Democrat voters, STAT …

  2. #2
    On November 18th, 2010 at 11:03 am, DanMan said:

    good grief who wrote this bill? That’s treasonous.

  3. #3
    On November 18th, 2010 at 11:10 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    My El Paso Congresscritter–Silvestre Reyes (D-Tx.) is bulletproof. He is a solid vote for all of Comrade Obama’s (PBUH) agenda. And most other DimocRATS / RINOs think that the heat is off for a few years. They will do a “hard pivot’ and sock it to the taxpayers again.
    ***
    Remember their names in November 2012.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  4. #4
    On November 18th, 2010 at 11:41 am, AlohaGuy said:

    OT – nice picture of the burro or donkey Michelle. I’ve always thought it unfair that Dems compare themselves to these animals.

    Ok, back to business….

  5. #5
    On November 18th, 2010 at 11:47 am, stillontheroad said:

    And while all eyes are diverted to the Illegal business, the senate sneaked this through -Senate Bill 510- more of the same crap from the same Rinos and 2012 cannot get here soon enough – I am damn sick and tired of this crap.

  6. #6
    On November 18th, 2010 at 11:58 am, hawkeye54 said:

    Remember their names in November 2012.

    If this disaster passes, we may not make it to November 2012.

  7. #7
    On November 18th, 2010 at 12:03 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    The fact we even have to fight these battles is pathetic.

    How can anyone justify bestowing any sort of citizenship benefits on people who are not citizens and not here legally? It’s utter f’n madness.

    And to still have GOP on the fence only two weeks after they’re given a victory not seen since the ’30′s…

  8. #8
    On November 18th, 2010 at 12:04 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    more of the same crap from the same Rinos and 2012 cannot get here soon enough.

    I’m really starting to prefer calling the DIABLOs: Dems In All But Label Only.

    They resemble no part of true Republican principles in supporting leftist democrat political legislation like this.

  9. #9
    On November 18th, 2010 at 12:38 pm, thutmose18 said:

    Should we deport Americanized children of illegals who have been brought here when they were around 3 years old?

  10. #10
    On November 18th, 2010 at 12:45 pm, stillontheroad said:

    thutmose18 said:
    Life is tough besides – they are still citizens of the country their parents are citizens of – soooooooooooo!!

  11. #11
    On November 18th, 2010 at 1:50 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Should we deport Americanized children of illegals who have been brought here when they were around 3 years old?

    Yes.

  12. #12
    On November 18th, 2010 at 1:51 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Yes, hispanics can certainly be as American as you or I, I know some. However, Mexicans are not Americans, Guatamalans are not Americans, Hondurans are not Americans, El Salvadorans are not Americans. They can be, IF they apply for legal entry and follow our EXISTING path to citizenship. When someone lets himself into your house without your permission, do you consider him a guest? I don’t. Invasion is not the right term, but what is happening is NOT immigration. People do not have an unlimited right to “migrate” from their country to ours. I know many immigrants from all over the world and it is especially for them that I oppose amnesty for illegal aliens. Some have waited years in refugee camps in Southeast Asia for their chance to become Americans. They respect this country, our laws, language and culture. All of them took the time, effort and expense to do it the right way. We should honor all those who have and not insult their sacrifices with another amnesty. The amnesty of 1986 has resulted in 10 times the number of illegal aliens and a general disregard for our laws. Another amnesty would be equally successful.

  13. #13
    On November 18th, 2010 at 2:21 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    THUTMOSE18 said, Should we deport Americanized children of illegals who have been brought here when they were around 3 years old?

    The members of Congress need to review and understand the meaning of Amendment 14 to the U.S. Constitution…remember that document? Dems and the press have fooled Americans into believing that children born on US soil are automatically US Citizens. NOT TRUE…unless those parents are U.S. Citizens, those children ARE NOT U.S. citizens. I’m not going to be made to feel guilty because illegal alien parents think their children deserve automatic citizenship. The DREAM act (what a misnomer!) is a nightmare for those of us who think immigration needs to be enforced according to the Constitution.

  14. #14
    On November 18th, 2010 at 2:26 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Should we deport Americanized children of illegals who have been brought here when they were around 3 years old?
    Yes

    I second the motion.

  15. #15
    On November 18th, 2010 at 2:30 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    On November 18th, 2010 at 12:38 pm, thutmose18 said:
    Should we deport Americanized children of illegals who have been brought here when they were around 3 years old?

    “Americanized children of illegals who have been brought here around 3 years old” is just a long way of saying “illegal alien.”

    So, yes. The answer to your question is yes. And then they should blame their stupid parents for breaking the law all those years ago.

  16. #16
    On November 18th, 2010 at 3:39 pm, thutmose18 said:

    I do agree about sending all illegals back to their country of origin. However, on a personal, human level, I think it would be very damaging to do it to a basically Americanized child who speaks American English and grew up in the schools. The transition from greatest country in the world to worlds most violent 3rd world hellhole would be traumatic.

  17. #17
    On November 18th, 2010 at 4:14 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Thutmose18: There is always a price to be paid for doing ANYTHING illegal. The rule of law and our Constitution must be upheld, or we too, become the violent 3rd world hellhole you speak of. Unprotected borders are a death wish for remaining the “greaest country in the world.”

  18. #18
    On November 18th, 2010 at 4:26 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    We need Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement, not reform. We need to restore respect for the law and the faith of the American people that their government is not selling them out. Amnesty for the illegal aliens is also amnesty for the corrupt companies who have been employing them. Money trumps everything, including love of country. Multi-nationals have no loyalty to country by definition, they see us as a market, not a nation. They see people as workers, documented or undocumented, no difference. If they can’t send the work to where the labor is cheaper, then they want to bring the cheap labor here. If citizenship becomes meaningless, this is no longer The United States of America.

    If we love our Constitution and our representative Republic and we intend to keep it we must not surrender our sovereignty or abandon the rule of law. Profits must not supercede security. We should not create a new path to citizenship. We have a path to citizenship, more generous than any other country, illegal aliens have ignored it and bad choices do have consequences.

  19. #19
    On November 18th, 2010 at 9:21 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Democrat
    Racists
    Enacting
    Amnesty
    Murder

    America
    Callously
    Tragically

  20. #20
    On November 19th, 2010 at 10:26 am, Solo said:

    On November 18th, 2010 at 4:26 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Well said, VP.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook