Ted Turner Suggests Child Offsets; Poor People Overcrowding Planet, Obstructing View of His Vacant 2 Million Acres

By Doug Powers  •  December 9, 2010 03:43 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

Ted Turner has five kids. If you have more than one, it’s too many — you’re killing the planet.

This guy gets more whacked by the second:

Mr. Turner – a long-time advocate of population control – said the environmental stress on the Earth requires radical solutions, suggesting countries should follow China’s lead in instituting a one-child policy to reduce global population over time. He added that fertility rights could be sold so that poor people could profit from their decision not to reproduce.

Don’t you love how Turner just assumes that it’s on “the poor” to stop having kids? Who has a bigger carbon footprint — poor kids living in small dwellings and walking everywhere, or the children of billionaires who borrow dad’s private jet to go to the prom?

Isn’t there a more polite way for Ted to essentially say “the rich should inherit the earth and the poor should just f-in die off” than this? I’ll give him points though for trying to add a hearty dose of free market capitalism to his push for totalitarian ecocide. Ted will do anything to avoid allowing anybody on this horribly overpopulated planet to live on his two million acres of land!

Last year, Turner, along with Bill Gates, David Rockefeller Jr, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg and Oprah “I am not a lesbian!” Winfrey met in Manhattan and decided the world has too many non-billionaires.

I wish I’d have been one of the lowly servants at that meeting, because I would have been happy to tell them how they could have decreased the world’s population by a full seven people before the meeting even ended.

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On December 9th, 2010 at 3:49 pm, letget said:

    One would expect this from a man that was once married to hanoi jane! Idiot doesn’t quite make it with this man.
    L

  2. #2
    On December 9th, 2010 at 3:49 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    He added that fertility rights could be sold so that poor people could profit from their decision not to reproduce.

    Does Algore know about this, since he’s been taking a hit on his carbon offset business, could be his new “reproduction offset” entrerprise.

  3. #3
    On December 9th, 2010 at 3:53 pm, Hangfire said:

    Ted Turner = SorosLite.

  4. #4
    On December 9th, 2010 at 3:55 pm, orlandocajun said:

    Well as long as he doesn’t reproduce, then we have a leg up!

  5. #5
    On December 9th, 2010 at 3:55 pm, Hangfire said:

    Islam has a plan to stop overpopulation.

  6. #6
    On December 9th, 2010 at 3:55 pm, rambler said:

    Another rich idiot.

  7. #7
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:00 pm, John Deaux said:

    Mr. Turner – a long-time advocate of population control

    I know how he could reduce the population by one.

    Now if all the jackasses who agree with him would just follow suit, we’d be fine. If not, then it’s because they have no compassion.

  8. #8
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:05 pm, RedDog said:

    Please dress up Ted in a beautiful black SS uniform top with matching hat and silver death skull accessories. For his bottoms, outfit him with black and silver-threaded buttless chaps, and complete the ensemble with a stiff riding crop and knee-length patent leather jack boots with silver spurs.

    Herr chapoutier will be by later to spank him in a public venue whilst reading aloud Whitman’s O Captain My Captain!.

  9. #9
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:08 pm, thejim said:

    Ted has passed the simply mis- informed and ignorant mark in the sand. He’s now well into stupid territory. The only reason to report on anything the buffon says is for the entertainment factor. Liberal stupidy on display.

  10. #10
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:11 pm, RedDog said:

    He added that fertility rights could be sold so that poor people could profit from their decision not to reproduce.

    Ted Turner is a man wretchedly poor in spirit. ….with a heart two sizes too small.

    He makes The Grinch look like Mother Teresa. In all seriousness, even though he rejects God, he needs much prayer.

  11. #11
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:11 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Now now good people: no picking on the mentally challenged. But then I do know a few farmers/ranchers in Montana who would like to hang the man.

  12. #12
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:13 pm, RedDog said:

    Too much money and too much idle time on his hands. Probably too much single malt too.

  13. #13
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:14 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Mr. Turner – a long-time advocate of population control
    I know how he could reduce the population by one.

    Now if all the jackasses who agree with him would just follow suit, we’d be fine. If not, then it’s because they have no compassion

    I’ve often said that these people should lead by example. You believe the world is overpopulated Mr. Turner? We aren’t stopping you from leaving. By all means, you first.

  14. #14
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:19 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I’m all for reducing carbon footprints. Ted and his buddies can stop exhaling today. I’ll check in on them tomorrow to verify the carbon reduction…

    Oh, and then I’ll say something nice about them here on the memorial blog page. I’ll say something really touching and heartfelt, I promise…

  15. #15
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:20 pm, RedDog said:

    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:11 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:
    …But then I do know a few farmers/ranchers in Montana who would like to hang the man.

    “You’re a long way from Atlanta mister businessman.” said the old timer as he leaned over the fender of his truck taking a long drag on a short Swisher. The wafting smoke stung his eyes and he squinted. “Maybe you need some help finding your way out of town. I can do that for you or I can just whip your sorry a** – seeing as how you’re wearing buttless chaps.”

  16. #16
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:20 pm, Mister P said:

    I think his parents should not have had any children.

  17. #17
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:26 pm, Hadenough said:

    Limiting fertility rights to poor people? I’m starting to like this guy.

  18. #18
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:30 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, Maybe Al Gore can buy some kids/credits to carry around carbon footprint offset credits.

    “Please Sir, May I have another??!!”

  19. #19
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:33 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah No one ever said old Ted was smart, just look at the commie he was schtupping all these years!

    “CAPTAIN PLANET!!!”

  20. #20
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:34 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Ted Turner: If only all these little bastages would just Die! Die! Die! With festering pustules die! Ooh, did I say that out loud? :shock:

  21. #21
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:40 pm, Romeo13 said:

    Ted Turner is an idiot…

    But you do have to question a Tax system, that has families that uses MORE resources, pay less in taxes…

    And I say that as a Parent…

  22. #22
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:44 pm, greenLibertarian said:

    Let’s be fair to Mr. Turner.
    When he had his children, the population problem was not as severe as it is now, and it was not anticipated or known of as widely then as it is now.

    He is correct: we need to reduce populations to sustainable levels. We are already living unsustainably: we are
    reducing biomass in our soils, pumping watersheds and other water sources dry, and damaging the environment just to maintain the populations we have now. Increasing the populations and decreasing the environment’s ability to sustain them must end badly.

    Hypocrisy on the part of wealthy and other environmentalists has no physical relevance. The problem either exists, which I believe – based on overwhelming empirical evidence, or it does not.

    I agree that the unwillingness of these people to walk the walk – by reducing their eco footprints – damages the credibility of the issue, and they deserve our scorn for that.

  23. #23
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:48 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Like I said in another thread, socialism produces masses of miserable starving people which ultimately has the thugs running it, along with their elitist enablers like Turner, facing the question whatever in the world can they ‘DO’ about all of them?

    Hey Ted, why not just come out of the closet, admit that you are the elitist commie you are and praise Mao and Stalin who easily found ways to solve population concerns like yours.

  24. #24
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:48 pm, RedDog said:

    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:34 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Ted Turner: If only all these little bastages would just Die! Die! Die!

    Personally I could use a few thousand more of the little bastages to help pay for my retirement. But Ted and Friends’ campaign to stamp out babies is working so well I’m about to despair of ever being able to take up the rocking chair.

    I’ll probably end up out front of his palatial estate one night, drunk and in nothing but my whitey tighties with a bottle of Evan Williams Green Label in one hand and an old cap and ball Navy Colt in the other. “Come on out you son of a b*itch. I can beat you and any other gob of spit in that house. Come on out Turner!” Or something like that.

  25. #25
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:49 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Hmm. Does exposure to excessive amounts of money cause brain damage?
    I’m seeing a trend here. Media moguls, Hollywood twits, musical acts, sports celebrities, …
    There may be a direct correlation between digits in net worth and loss of brain cells. A dissection may be necessary to prove my hypothesis.

  26. #26
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:52 pm, RedDog said:

    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:44 pm, greenLibertarian said:

    Dammit greenLib you are quite the buzz-kill. Stop with the intellectual treatise and dive into the self-indulgent muck with the rest of us. We are all friends here. As Cheddar would say: “You bastage.”.

  27. #27
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:54 pm, vcallaway said:

    And let us not forget that his ex-wife put more troops in harms way than Wikileaks.

  28. #28
    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:55 pm, Truesoldier said:

    Mr. Turner – a long-time advocate of population control – said the environmental stress on the Earth requires radical solutions, suggesting countries should follow China’s lead in instituting a one-child policy to reduce global population over time. reproduce.

    Yeah cause that worked out soooo great in China…right down to the forced late term abortions. Not to mention what ever happened to the right of the women being able to choose what to do with her body…oh that’s right that only counts when it comes to abortion….

  29. #29
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:00 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    greenLibertarian said: He is correct: we need to reduce populations to sustainable levels.

    BS – not here in the USA if we can keep OUT the invading illegals. Our population without immigratation is actually NEGATIVE and quite ‘sustainable’.

    The problem is socialism which produces poverty and over-population. That plus they don’t give a rat’s rear end about harming the environment when nearly their entire wage is spent on getting enough food to eat. Capitalism and free enterprise produces SURPLUS and stability. Without those people will continue to have 10 children because they know 8 will likely die living in a socialist hell hole.

    Here, go argue with Milton Friedman who said:

    In the only cases in which the masses have escaped from the kind of grinding poverty that you are talking about, the only cases in recorded history are where they have had capitalism and largely free trade. If you want to know where the masses are worst off, it’s exactly in the kind of societies that depart from that. So that the record of history is absolutely crystal clear, there is no alternative way, so far discovered, of improving the lot of the ordinary people that can hold a candle to the productive activities that are unleashed by a free enterprise system.

  30. #30
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:01 pm, max said:

    jest a mite little addition to yer prose-ifyin’ thar Red D….

    “You’re a long way from Atlanta mister businessman.” said the old timer as he leaned over the fender of his truck taking a long drag on a short Swisher. The wafting smoke stung his eyes and he squinted. “Maybe you need some help finding your way out of town. I can do that for you or I can just whip your sorry a** – seeing as how you’re wearing buttless chaps — which I reckon come in mighty handy when you and your CNN ploughboys git down to stemmin’the rose thar on yer 2 million acres!.”

  31. #31
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:06 pm, spaceycakes said:

    I wish I’d have been one of the lowly servants at that meeting

    Oui, also me as well because, how you say?– I could have placed ze menstrual blood in ze fois gras.

  32. #32
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:12 pm, granite said:

    Is it just me, or have other posters here noticed that lately, as the outrages, pokes-in-the-eye, middle-fingers-in-the-face from the ruling-class elitists, America-haters/destroyers, opposite worldview-holders, socialists, collectivists, statists, etc. get more and more blatant and worse and worse; that the posters who were until relatively recently the cheerleaders for these socialist elitists have become very, very,…very quiet?

  33. #33
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:14 pm, walterc said:

    All the fuss over Sarah Palin hunting caribou and then this guy’s website saying that his 2 million acres are in the business of raising buffalo (presumably for meat) and “outfitting” (read guided hunts).

    The hypocrisy coming out of the left this week is astonishing.

    What maroon.

    As far as overpopulation goes, I’m of the mind that mother nature will take care of herself. Once the population exceeds capacity, there will be a die off. Basic land/wildlife management. Either reduce the population through some means (hunting, sterilization, transplanting or nature will do it for us). Now I’m not advocating that we start killing undesirables in the population, just that if we do nothing nature will take care of it.

  34. #34
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:22 pm, Hangfire said:

    As far as reducing world population goes…….

    …..Islam accounts for about 30%.

    Just sayin’.

  35. #35
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:24 pm, iamgman said:

    It had to be the meeting of the biggest douche of they year nominees.

  36. #36
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:26 pm, greenLibertarian said:

    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:52 pm, RedDog said:

    On December 9th, 2010 at 4:44 pm, greenLibertarian said:

    Dammit greenLib you are quite the buzz-kill. Stop with the intellectual treatise and dive into the self-indulgent muck with the rest of us. We are all friends here. As Cheddar would say: “You bastage.”.

    Sorry, RedDog, but there are better things to dive into than self-indulgent muck. The coming economic/debt bomb, and the roughly analogous eco/population bomb, are far more important! :)

  37. #37
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:33 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Good lord! Not more cat-jugglers!

  38. #38
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:40 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    As far as reducing world population goes…….

    …..Islam accounts for about 30%.

    Just sayin’.

    Oh Hangfire-where DO you come up with these jewels?

  39. #39
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:42 pm, spaceycakes said:

    ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    did you say ‘jewels’? Oh.

  40. #40
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:43 pm, MacEamonn said:

    I can’t find any info on if he has any siblings, but can we make Turner’s plan retroactive to prior to his birth?

  41. #41
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:50 pm, thejim said:

    Well Greenie you’re wrong. The poulation is quiet sustainable. There is no empiracle evidence to the contrary, simply the uninformed spouting their opinions, based on flawed work.

  42. #42
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:51 pm, ThunderHawkk said:

    I always kind of hoped Turner would get trampled by one of his buffalos. Jane too…

  43. #43
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:55 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    And, once again, the inherent racism and anti-life underbelly of the “environmental” movement rears its ugly head.

  44. #44
    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:57 pm, madmonkphotog said:

    How long before rivers in America are filled with the skeletons of discarded children the same way rivers in China are filled with skeletons of discarded girls?

  45. #45
    On December 9th, 2010 at 6:15 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    I suggest that to address their concerns about over population, all liberals off themselves. Liberal Berkeley residents ……you’re up first.

    BEGIN!

  46. #46
    On December 9th, 2010 at 6:16 pm, blues said:

    If all these wacked-out Libidiots really want to reduce population the solution is obvious.

  47. #47
    On December 9th, 2010 at 7:04 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    He added that fertility rights could be sold so that poor people could profit from their decision not to reproduce.

    Hold the phone, Central!

    Why do I get the feeling that he isn’t talking about rights? It sounds more like privileges. If it’s a right, you have it and it cannot be taken away. But this neo-eugenics idea sounds a lot like the gov’t is the one that will manage these “rights” and hand them out to the favored few.

    Ted? Just STFU.

  48. #48
    On December 9th, 2010 at 7:07 pm, Common Sense said:

    Does all that money warp their brains somehow?

    Since a higher standard of living is key for lowering reproduction rates, maybe all of these moneybags could do some good with their riches and promote the free market and democracy in those poor areas around the world.

  49. #49
    On December 9th, 2010 at 7:10 pm, ThunderHawkk said:

    I want all the Lieberals to begin the deathkill! Please, kill yourselves to SAVE THE PLANET! Help fight global warming!

    Stupid lieberals…

  50. #50
    On December 9th, 2010 at 7:11 pm, ThunderHawkk said:

    Lieberals… heheh…

  51. #51
    On December 9th, 2010 at 8:20 pm, John Deaux said:

    It really isn’t such a big step from suggesting forced population control through birth privileges to pro-actively culling the herd.

    Just be thankful one of the leftist jackasses isn’t the president carrying the nuclear codes.

    :shock:

  52. #52
    On December 9th, 2010 at 8:20 pm, Hangfire said:

    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:40 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:
    Oh Hangfire-where DO you come up with these jewels?

    Been peeking at me in the shower again, eh?

  53. #53
    On December 9th, 2010 at 8:21 pm, cabrerski said:

    Ok, Ted…
    Line up your kids…pick your favorite…the rest are Soylent Green.

  54. #54
    On December 9th, 2010 at 8:38 pm, AmericaFirst said:

    Doug always starts these unnecessary firestorm blog posts. Michelle the Firecracker and now Doug the Firestorm. Please allow Ted’s dementia to flower, pollinate and then take fruit before you pick it. Present the ole chap with a cane. I would love to see him scowl then twirl that walking stick like a baton with his pro gay George Soros marching band. Oh, did you hear Oprah Winfrey is a homo? Here is an interesting note. My Google Chrome browser has spell checker. It never red underscored Oprah’s full name as misspelled, but does it to everyone else’s name. Google Loves The Gay “O”.

  55. #55
    On December 9th, 2010 at 9:32 pm, conservoman said:

    What we should do is this:

    1) End all benefits after about the fourth child at most!!! Some women in the UK have extra children just to get the benefit!

    2) Mothers should have to spend a reasonable amount of time with their children every day or every week at most. They’re THEIR children, nobody elses, and it is only natural that they should stay with them.

    These things would help the birth rate decline a bit I would hope, not geriatric fool Turner’s eugenics-based nonsense.

    The way it is now young women just have children and throw them to the state. They think of how easy that was and they keep doing it!!!! It’s a joke.

  56. #56
    On December 9th, 2010 at 9:39 pm, ent said:

    Sarah Palin shoots one caribou and the whacko leftists go apoplectic.

    But Ted Turner can slaughter thousands of (cute, cuddly, formerly endangered) buffalo each year, and that’s apparently just hunky-dory?

  57. #57
    On December 9th, 2010 at 9:58 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Liberalism 101:

    Sacrifice for thee, but not for me!

  58. #58
    On December 9th, 2010 at 10:17 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On December 9th, 2010 at 5:06 pm, spaceycakes said:
    Oui, also me as well because, how you say?– I could have placed ze menstrual blood in ze fois gras.

    Garth Algar: Uhm, Wayne? What do you do if every time you see this one incredible woman, you think you’re gonna hurl?
    Wayne Campbell: I say hurl. If you blow chunks and she comes back, she’s yours. But if you spew and she bolts, then it was never meant to be.

  59. #59
    On December 9th, 2010 at 11:15 pm, angryoldfatman said:

    greenLib,

    Your schtick is a 40-year-old rehash of 200-year-old tripe.

    It was dead wrong 200 years ago.

    It was proven wrong again when rehashed 40 years ago.

    It’s going to be wrong as long as there are people free to innovate in free markets.

    Tell us about global warming now. Or is it cooling? Oh, yeah, it’s climate CHANGE, as if the climate never changed before the evil virus of mankind infected Mother Gaia and gave her a fever… or cold… or something, hell if I can keep up with the pagan B.S. I’m supposed to genuflect towards anymore.

  60. #60
    On December 9th, 2010 at 11:29 pm, BruceB said:

    Gee. I’m glad i had dinner already when u posted about chappy and teddy boy.The mental image of this is quite startling.probably will have nightmares later on.
    Plz don’t do this again

  61. #61
    On December 10th, 2010 at 3:12 am, jamesgreenidge said:

    On December 9th, 2010 at 9:39 pm, ent said:

    Sarah Palin shoots one caribou and the whacko leftists go apoplectic.

    Even more absurd is that one stupid animal is holding our entire energy policy hostage up there. The oil that runs our cars, ecomomy and homes, all held up because of this stupid animal and also a “cuddly” polar bear — more important than your family’s well-being. Totally insane. Even more so when you see TV and teachers brainwashing others to believe it.

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  62. #62
    On December 10th, 2010 at 4:18 am, jamesgreenidge said:

    Anyone see Chevron’s new PC ad? “Fighting AIDS should be corporate policy. We agree.”

    Oh really? I don’t mind charity and contributions, but isn’t your aim and focus supposed to be making cheap energy?? Jeese!

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

    MM: Watch your back with these SniperHacker morons!

  63. #63
    On December 10th, 2010 at 8:51 am, spaceycakes said:

    Rogue–does that mean you like my sense of humor?

    LOL

  64. #64
    On December 10th, 2010 at 9:17 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On December 10th, 2010 at 8:51 am, spaceycakes said:
    Rogue–does that mean you like my sense of humor?

    Indubitably!

  65. #65
    On December 10th, 2010 at 9:41 am, Peddler said:

    Good Ole Ted. Man certainly has changed since the days when he made a public plea to buy stock in his television station in Charlotte, NC. In order to save the station which broadcast nothing but family friendly reruns, etc., he promised to repay everyone with interest. The amount he was asking for was around $8 or so.

    He got enough money to save the station and he did repay, with interest, everyone one who invested and provided a name and address. At the time, he was an unabashed capitalist and played the system to the hilt.

    Also, his plantation home in SC did not have air conditioning and he made his kids work for anything they received. Now, do you understand why you never hear about them at all?

    Ted Turner – one of a kind and one that should be put on display at some museum, away from the public.

  66. #66
    On December 10th, 2010 at 10:49 am, Yashmak said:

    Is it possible to revoke the Bush tax cuts for the $250k+ bracket for just one person?

  67. #67
    On December 10th, 2010 at 12:23 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Ted is mentally unstable, probably psychotic, after all, he married Jane Fonda.

  68. #68
    On December 10th, 2010 at 3:05 pm, RogersUmp said:

    Typically elitest…I got mine and I really don’t care about anyone else.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook