Call for Bipartisan Seating at the State of the Union

By Doug Powers  •  January 15, 2011 02:32 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

If they’re not careful, the “We are the World” people are going to sue for copyright infringement:

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaksa) has joined Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) in spearheading Udall’s effort to have bipartisan seating at the State of the Union, Murkowski’s office announced Friday.

In a letter to members of Congress today Murkowski and Udall propose Republicans and Democrats sit together during the State of the Union address. Currently, the tradition is for Democrats and Republicans to sit only with members of their party during the presidential address. The proposal comes after an earlier one by Udall where the Democrat and Republican leadership would sit together during the presidential address.

This could be the first State of the Union to end with a loud reminder from the Sergeant at Arms: “Everybody’s invited to a pajama party at Olympia Snowe’s place!”

In addition to the bipartisan seating idea, other proposals on the table include all of Congress recording an eHarmony.com commercial together and Lisa Murkowski leading a recitation of the Pledge of Kum Ba Yah. However, sources tell me that John Boehner has soured the bipartisan mood by turning down an invitation to spend the duration of the State of the Union speech sitting on Joe Biden’s lap.

Here are those who have signed on, by way of Sister Toldjah:

Senate signers are as follows: Sen. Begich (D-Alaska), Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif), Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Sen. Kristen Gilibrand (D-N.Y.), Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Udall for the Democrats and Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska, and Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) for the Republicans. In the House, all nine signers are Democrats.

Craftsman doesn’t churn out as many tools as Congress.

In a Washington Post op-ed, John McCain wrote this:

The president appropriately disputed the injurious suggestion that some participants in our political debates were responsible for a depraved man’s inhumanity.

This is precisely the kind of thing that demonstrates why John McCain fared so poorly in the election and why I plugged my nose when I voted for him. McCain said political rhetoric wasn’t responsible for the Tucson murders. Then, he signed on to this ridiculous “bipartisan seating” idea which is a stunt to imply partisan politics had everything to do with Jared Loughner’s unhinged killing spree.

So far, no Republican in the House has signed on, so kudos to them for not snapping up the bait.

In the meantime, plans for a bipartisan SOTU are ongoing, and the Democrats have commissioned an artist to draw up exactly how they want the evening to look:

null

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Politics

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:41 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, Can you say “Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic”???

  2. #2
    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:44 pm, dan708 said:

    I have a better (and cheaper) solution to this pressing, critical issue; let OweBowMao give the address from the Oval Office. That would save big on security costs, no?

  3. #3
    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:46 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, Surprise surprise, the Hon. Sen. Mikulski from the People’s Republic hasn’t signed on yet. Maybe there’s a WNBA or LPGA event on the tube that night.

  4. #4
    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:46 pm, behiker said:

    The dems are probably expecting some crazed tea partier to sneak guns in and start shooting up the place. They want to be sitting amongst Republicans to use as shields.

  5. #5
    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:47 pm, Republicanvet said:

    I get more disgusted with RINO’s/Republicans every time I see any reference to this stupidity.

    Were they all in a cave for the last week?

    Were they all in a cave for the last month?

    Were they all in a cave for the last YEAR?

    The left has NO intention of being nice to anyone, and will absolutely eviscerate anyone with an R after their name given a chance.

    Yeah, that’s just what I want. Our supposed “representatives” playing footsie and holding hands with the same people accusing people like me, who believe in smaller government and despise socialism, of inciting mass murder because of those beliefs.

  6. #6
    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:49 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, someone better tell the President that The State of the Union isn’t suppose to be a status report on AFSME, UAW and SEIU.

  7. #7
    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:52 pm, dat60a3 said:

    The Conservatives should coordinate it so that when the President makes an outrageous statement, all of them snort or chuckle at the same time. That way it will look like the entire chamber is snorting.

  8. #8
    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:53 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, when the Dems and Pelosi were asked about suppporting Bi-Partisian seating, they completely misunderstood the question.

  9. #9
    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:55 pm, bedje said:

    Never heard this crap when they had the marjority. Only now since they have been outnumbered are they putting down the crack pipe they’ve been tokin’ on the last couple of years. Hey Nancy, don’t bogart!!!

  10. #10
    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:58 pm, bedje said:

    I think the 5 Rinos that agreed did so under the guise that they were getting t-shirts.

  11. #11
    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:58 pm, Savage24 said:

    Snowe is a Republican from Maine, but who cares, she’s still a RINO. In fact all of these Republicans are RINO’s that need to be primaried in coming elections. Their brotherly love will only get them a knife in the back from their brothers and sisters on the other side of the aisle when they are through with them. Are they expected to hold hands to during the SOTU speech too.

  12. #12
    On January 15th, 2011 at 3:00 pm, Lockstein13 said:

    Lemme get this straight:
    The Demo-WE-WON-crats, who spent the last TWO YEARS bloodlessly ramming socialist policy after socialist policy through the House and Senate, alternating between ignoring, suppressing and evading Republican input - much less compromise (ooh ooh! is THAT viloent rhetoric too nowadays?!) - are now calling for bipartisanship?!

    REALLY?!?

    Better make sure that by “bipartisanship” they don’t mean the first half of draw and quartering.

    phhht!

  13. #13
    On January 15th, 2011 at 3:06 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:47 pm, Republicanvet said:

    Yeah…what you said!! It is so obvious what they are trying to do…force us to reach across the aisle once again like we used to. Well, they made sure that was NOT going to happen by the way they treated the Republicans the past two years. Their complete disregard for any ideas or input, their ramrodding outrageous bills through without a single Republican yes vote, their nasty rhetoric, their taunting (remember Pelosi marching along with that giant gavel after the obamacare went through?)…and now that they have lost the House, they want “compromise”. Please, God, don’t let our folks fall for their deceit. Don’t let them forget what they are dealing with…evil forces trying to destroy our country. This is no time for compromise!! It is time to dig in and grow a spine. I watched Chris Christie this a.m. He is the kind of person we need ALL of our Republican Reprentatives to emulate. He is tough, stubborn, opinonated, non-compromising on his principal beliefs. There is no way he would agree to compromising with regressives on anything! And by the way, if we don’t elect a President in 2012 JUST LIKE Christie, we are toast.

  14. #14
    On January 15th, 2011 at 3:13 pm, greenfairie said:

    Michael Savage is right; most of the GOP establishment simply considers a progressive-authoritarian state an inevitability and they’re just going along to get along so they’ll get a sliver of the power pie.

  15. #15
    On January 15th, 2011 at 3:13 pm, revolution said:

    Craftsman doesn’t churn out as many tools as Congress.

    Quote of the year, so far.

  16. #16
    On January 15th, 2011 at 3:15 pm, Wade said:

    NFW

  17. #17
    On January 15th, 2011 at 3:27 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    I’m going to re-post the comment I left at Sister Toldjah because…. well, because I’m lazy and I’m not feeling the luv lately.

    It would be the perfect metaphor for what ails our country: a one-party government locked arm-in-arm defying the will of the people. This is just political posturing substituting for honest debate. The voters are upset across the liberal-conservative spectrum for the same reason: our government is no longer responsive and accountable to the electorate. We have a right to be upset and civility (which is not exactly lacking among us grassroots Tea Partiers) will return when the constitutionally-guaranteed process is restored.

    Global fascism where corporations merge with governments to erase nations and borders presents a very bleak future for the world. America has been and remains the last best hope against such efforts yet we seem to be the HQ.

    They have won so far because of the money and the complacency of voters numbed by a good economy. Voters are no longer complacent. They are increasingly abandoning both parties, first to being independents and eventually gravitating to the Tea Party.

    The Tea Party demonstrated in 2010 that it can successfully confound the big money. That means we can win and the establishment knows it. Thus the shrill “incivility” among the elites as they falsely accuse conservatives and the Tea Party of everything vile and repulsive to what we stand for. They are desperate. A third-party candidate is suddenly a real threat.

  18. #18
    On January 15th, 2011 at 3:28 pm, prendad said:

    Oh this is soooo sweet. Say, what’s your name? Wanna be friends? How about a crumpet with your tea???

  19. #19
    On January 15th, 2011 at 4:06 pm, stoptheinvasion said:

    watch out R’s, you sit next to one of those creeps and you’ll wind up with a knife in your back.

    this is garbage, proposed by the losing side that just got crushed in the election and then that slandered and libeled every conservative in the country for a solid week with their lies and sickening smears on innocent people just leading their lives.

    DON’T DO THIS.
    LEFTISTS AND LIBERALS ARE LIARS.
    YOU DON’T COMPROMISE WITH LIARS.
    YOU DON’T DEAL WITH LIARS.
    YOU DON’T SIT NEXT TO LIARS WHEN THEY ASK YOU TO FOR THEIR OWN SELFISH PURPOSES.
    TELL THE LIARS TO GO TO HELL AND THEN REPEAL THEIR MARXIST HEALTH CONTROL LAW.

  20. #20
    On January 15th, 2011 at 4:07 pm, pabarge said:

    Murkowski. Nice.

    Thanks for nothing, Alaska. What the heck were you thinking?

  21. #21
    On January 15th, 2011 at 4:13 pm, swede said:

    Some sound advice to the GOP in the words of Margaret Thatcher, “Now, don’t go wobbly.” The message of the election was not to work together – it was to stop the insanity! Gridlock is good – Obstructionism is OK – Partisanship is preferable. It means the system is working. If you accomplish nothing this year but arresting the growth of government, hyper-regulation and spending, well done! Be the party of HELL NO!

    I’d suggest Ayotte, Collins, McCain, Murkowski and Snowe just go on over and sit with their Democritter BFFs. Then people can see who they really are.

  22. #22
    On January 15th, 2011 at 4:19 pm, rightisright said:

    This no more than a political stunt by the left and RINOs to take away the importance and power the new Republican House acquired after the elections of last Nov.
    I personally want to see and hear the Republican stand, hoot and holler as the Odopo fling his condescending vitriolic bs at the country on that night…instead of seeing the majority of liberals that carry on with their worshiping as they have in the past 2 state of the Union speeches.
    United my a$$, we are as far apart as ever, the left can’t fix the separation after all vitriol they’d thrown out especially in the last week never mind the last 50 years.

  23. #23
    On January 15th, 2011 at 4:25 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Whining Rino: Aw jeez do I have to sit next to Barney, he spits all over everything?!

  24. #24
    On January 15th, 2011 at 4:27 pm, rightisright said:

    I’d suggest Ayotte, Collins, McCain, Murkowski and Snowe just go on over and sit with their Democritter BFFs. Then people can see who they really are.

    Good idea, maybe their constituents especially the Arizonians that voted for McShame will see the wrong in their votes over the years.

    Partisanship is what makes democracy work for hell sakes. What possibly could be for the better if all the reps voted the same. I’ll tell you, stagnation along with destruction is what you’d have. Exactly what happens when enough RINOS abandon ship and sail with the lefties.

  25. #25
    On January 15th, 2011 at 4:34 pm, GladzKravtz said:

    Bipartisan seating may make it easier for the RINOs to blend in with the Dems when they stand and clap for every word that comes out of the president’s mouth.

  26. #26
    On January 15th, 2011 at 4:36 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Imagine a Conservative sitting next to the likes of Chuck U. Schumer. He would definitely need to wear garlic and a cross around his neck. Spit. At least we won’t have to watch “blinky” behind the POTUS…this time it will be Boehner. I just hope he can hold his tears until later! I never realized how much he slobbers when he cries until I saw him really go at it the other day…it was quite a sight!

  27. #27
    On January 15th, 2011 at 4:54 pm, aero said:

    Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaksa) already sits with the demoncrats. Check her voting record.

  28. #28
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:01 pm, rambler said:

    Send in the marshmallows and a portable camp fire. Why don’t they burn the Constitution too.

    Are these guys flippin’ NUTS???? The country is in a melt down and congress wants to do a seating chart. Do they think this is an award ceremony? Seems that the order of the day is procrastination. They say they got the message. Just what was that message again. The GOP should boycott the state of the union. I keep waiting for somebody…..anybody to have a Chris Christie moment.

  29. #29
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:01 pm, JamieD said:

    PLease, we need to be seated separately so the public can see the difference between right and wrong.

    If they all intermingle (like ‘diversity’), then the public will perceive a congress united behind the deceiver in chief, as if to show approval.

    I (speaking as a tea party individual I should say “we”) do not approve, so lets show it!

  30. #30
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:04 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Maybe Alito will let me sit in his seat. I promise to shake my head in disbelief.

  31. #31
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:08 pm, JamieD said:

    I am still miffed by Obama’s slick statement he interjected during his speech at the memorial service in AZ the other day.

    When speaking of the 9 year old that was murdered, he stated that we need to have an America that is great like “she imagined it to be”. (emphasis added) As if we are NOT a good, great nation. He should keep his Anti-American sentiments to himself and practice what he preaches.

    Did anyone else catch that phrase? It burned through me as soon as he said it.

  32. #32
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:18 pm, sbw999 said:

    Great, now the place will look like grand pa’s teeth every time the libs give Mao’bama a standing ovation.

    Same ole liberals, always form always substance. Sit separately, sit together, sit every other chair, sit on each other’s laps or stand on your chairs for all I care, just stop destroying my country.

  33. #33
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:19 pm, Doug V said:

    Kelly Ayotte of N.H. was just elected. Is she a RINO, or is it a rookie mistake?

  34. #34
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:27 pm, JamieD said:

    Well… it is NH :lol: . Although I hope it was a mistake.

  35. #35
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:32 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Kelly Ayotte was the RINO that Palin endorsed over the Tea Party candidate whom she just barely defeated. Another favor to McCain? Like in CA? Hard to figure Palin out. She’s been compromised ever since she endorsed McCain right out of the gate.

  36. #36
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:33 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    The Tea Party candidate Ayotte defeated in the Republican primary was Ovide Lamontagne.

  37. #37
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:35 pm, swede said:

    Did anyone else catch that phrase? It burned through me as soon as he said it.

    I caught the phrase but missed your obvious take. Good catch. When I heard it I just thought it was typical ME-siah arrogance, “How the he!! do you know what Christina was thinking?” Seems like she thought America was a pretty awesome place as is – no fundamental transformation needed.

  38. #38
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:46 pm, swede said:

    Pasadena Phil said:

    Hey Phil, I notice Doug Powers did exactly the same thing I did in ’08… “This is precisely the kind of thing that demonstrates why John McCain fared so poorly in the election and why I plugged my nose when I voted for him.”

    I thought that was de facto/smoking gun proof of RINOism. So I guess Doug’s a RINO? Just wondering.

  39. #39
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:52 pm, jamesgreenidge said:

    This “call” in one word:

    Phony.

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  40. #40
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:53 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    So Swede, I see you and Raggie are a pair again? The Texas Indigo Boys fronting the GOP squishes and trolling the conservative websites.

    It’s 2011, not 2004. Get with the program. I guess you and Raggie are competing for “last RINO standing”?

  41. #41
    On January 15th, 2011 at 5:58 pm, thejim said:

    Thanks Arizona! Thanks Alaska!

  42. #42
    On January 15th, 2011 at 6:24 pm, Ron said:

    I know, let’s let RINOs and Dems sit together and conservatives identify themselves.

  43. #43
    On January 15th, 2011 at 6:27 pm, letget said:

    I have to wonder how many SC Judges will show up? After last years sotu address by bho, he made a complete idiot of himself by cratering one of the three branches of government. I imagine the ‘wise gal’ and kagen and a few more will. I will not, do not watch bho’s mouth open with the lies coming out. I saw today that bho is going to give his ‘focus’ on education! I thought the focus, my main focus, the only thing I am going to do in 2011 will be jobs! Things have changed, the teachers unions must have gotten to him to help with the $1 B he needs for his reelection. Again a rant, but daily I rant against bho.
    L

  44. #44
    On January 15th, 2011 at 6:37 pm, Bruce said:

    “Symbolism without substance”
    Now where have I heard that before ….

  45. #45
    On January 15th, 2011 at 6:46 pm, swede said:

    Pasadena Phil said:

    That hurts deep down in my squishy heart, Phil. Funny snark, but as usual, you didn’t answer the question. If not the “nose-hold McCain vote,” (FYI I think that would be ’08) what is the definition of RINO?

    So you’ve been stalking again. Yup, Rags and I have been linked on some conservative sites. Guess they don’t know a RINO when they see one. How about you? Do you write anything other than snarky, condescending comments? Rags says “howdy” – well, actually I can’t say what he said. Terms of use.

    I really don’t mind your snark and insults, but getting others banned because you don’t like them stinks, Dr Phil. Just sayin’

  46. #46
    On January 15th, 2011 at 6:56 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Swede, are you as insane as Rags? Who am I to get anyone banned? If I had that power, I would be using it much more liberally. You and Rags have PPDS. I am to you what Sarah Palin is the the Dems, MSM and the RINOs. There is absolutely nothing I can say that you guys don’t trash me for. Rags even trashed me this morning at Dan Reihl’s blog making the same argument I was making and agreeing with me. How sick is that?

    Why don’t you guys just drop it. It’s time to grow up.

  47. #47
    On January 15th, 2011 at 6:58 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    BTW Doug, there IS a GOP House member who signed on, House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy. I expect Boehner and Cantor will sign on too.

  48. #48
    On January 15th, 2011 at 7:01 pm, CleanGuy said:

    Mix ‘em up so you can’t see who stands and who remains seated. The perfect cover.

  49. #49
    On January 15th, 2011 at 7:04 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    I doubt anyone cares but if you’re wondering what Swede is alluding to charging me with getting Rags banned from this site, read this and make up your own mind.

    A couple of days ago, Rags posted a comment at Rhiel World View complaining that I had him banned from that blog. How did he post his comment if he got banned? The guy is totally nuts.

  50. #50
    On January 15th, 2011 at 7:37 pm, txvet2 said:

    On January 15th, 2011 at 6:58 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    BTW Doug, there IS a GOP House member who signed on, House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy.

    Not a surprise. He’s from Collyfohnia.

  51. #51
    On January 15th, 2011 at 7:50 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:41 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah, Can you say “Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic”???

    How long can they hold their breath? If they want scuba gear they can provide their own.
    ===
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
    should be a convenience store,
    NOT a government agency.

  52. #52
    On January 15th, 2011 at 7:55 pm, happy2behere said:

    RINOs acting like Stepford Wives in the Potemkin Village, what could go wrong?

    The dems will orchestrate odd little tableus throughout the seating made specifically for the MSM to broadcast. And the RINOs will make no defense of their own.

    Another reason not to watch.

  53. #53
    On January 15th, 2011 at 8:10 pm, Teddy Kennedy said:

    Errah AN, we can only hope they do the right thing like leonardo did.

    Boehner: Everybody to the lifeboats: Democrats and Republicans first!

  54. #54
    On January 15th, 2011 at 9:16 pm, WaterBoyz said:

    Ayotte
    Collins
    McCain
    Murkowski
    Snowe
    I say there should be a new rule here. When ever these, and others, act like RINOs their R should be lower case.

  55. #55
    On January 15th, 2011 at 10:03 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    So far, no Republican in the House has signed on, so kudos to them for not snapping up the bait.

    Bait is exactly right. This is a trick. It’s designed to make do two things:
    1) Rob the Republicans of the photo-op of visually showing that they have the majority of the seats
    2) Continue the “Together We Thrive” branding and make it seem like Obama is “the great uniter” who did what no former President had done: bring the two parties together.

    That is complete and utter B.S.

    Obama and the rest of the (Demonrats/Democratic Socialists) weren’t at all interested in bipartisanship when forcing Obamacare down our throats.

    This is all a head fake now.

  56. #56
    On January 15th, 2011 at 10:06 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On January 15th, 2011 at 3:27 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    We have a right to be upset and civility (which is not exactly lacking among us grassroots Tea Partiers) will return when the constitutionally-guaranteed process is restored.

    This statement exactly goes right to the heart of things, yet has gone over the heads of the media and elite in DC.

    How civil is it to declare “We won” and ignore concerns?

    How civil is it to throw soldiers under the bus and declare a war is lost before a majority of additional resources are even deployed?

    How civil is it to bypass Congress and install many unaccountable Czars in positions of authority?

    How civil is it to claim the sorry economy is the fault only of Bush, while ignoring activity of politicians involved with Fannie/Freddie?

    Hundreds of examples of incivility could be cited leading up to ramming blatantly unconstitutional legislation through Congress, some loaded with pork, much of it never read, no details communicated to the public….

    …and now they want to make nice?

    …and we have Republicans who will be happy to quickly oblige.

  57. #57
    On January 15th, 2011 at 11:43 pm, swede said:

    Pasadena Phil said:

    I don’t know or care what your problem is with Rags. Why is it whenever I ask you this question you get snarky and evasive? You’ve labled me and others here RINOs, stupid and worse based on our voting against Obama, as Doug Powers did. I’d guess Michelle did too. Just curious why your assessment doesn’t apply to them as well. You’ve never answered who you voted for in the general, or if you voted at all. Never mind.

    FWIW, I contributed what I could to local campaigns and spent most of my free time last fall working phones, mailing, meet & greet, posting signs, manning booths, recruiting etc for conservatives around N Central GA, and we took back two of the 60 House seats. Not claiming credit, but felt damn good to do something more than talk. If my conservative creds don’t meet your standard – that rates about 998.5 billionth on the list of things that concern me. What did you do? Never mind – That concerns me less.

    Most of us cruise the same sites Phil. In all honesty, your stalking/attack victim meme is old and really paranoid/obsessive/creepy. You’re projecting. I’ve never gone after you unless you’re slamming me or someone else. Show me otherwise. [cue crickets] You are good at pushing people’s buttons, then crying fowl when they push back – like you did with Rags. I happen to know you indeed played a role in banning him. The rest of it is just silliness – that stinks. You’re right about one thing, someone needs to grow up.

    Sorry about OT thread space all. Last post on this. Nite.

  58. #58
    On January 15th, 2011 at 11:54 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    “Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska, and Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Alaska) for the Republicans”

    We have little Lisa thanks to the R elitists in the NRSC-RNC–Joe Miller WON that primary—
    mccain-I did not vote for him–voted for Palin!
    NO THING has changed w/ the R Party “inner circle”—
    I WARNED everyone about voting for the lesser of two evils-
    evil is evil!
    C-CS

  59. #59
    On January 16th, 2011 at 4:00 am, tpitman said:

    Who are the poor bastards who’ll have to sit on either side of Boxer? Are they all gonna show up in those lame “Together We Thrive” shirts? Maybe some “No Labels” shirts? Maybe Obama has some of those lab coats left over from the healthcare news conferences he can hand out just to make it even more confusing, and fake.
    Honestly, what must the world think when they see these people coming up with crap like this?
    I have to say, it won’t be the same without Nancy bouncing up and down out of her chair everytime Obama exhales. Boehner will probably be sitting there all muckle-mouthed with tears steaming down his cheeks, or sobbing uncontrollably on Joe Biden’s shoulder.

  60. #60
    On January 16th, 2011 at 4:03 am, tpitman said:

    One other thought. I’ll retract my statement about Boehner crying if, in the middle of the address, he lights up a cigarette.

  61. #61
    On January 16th, 2011 at 7:02 am, Dave Turson said:

    I’d like to sit with Justice Scalia. He called the State of the Union address a “juvenile spectacle.”

  62. #62
    On January 16th, 2011 at 9:29 am, MacEamonn said:

    On January 15th, 2011 at 2:44 pm, dan708 said:

    I have a better (and cheaper) solution to this pressing, critical issue; let OweBowMao give the address from the Oval Office. That would save big on security costs, no?

    There is no Constitutional requirement for a speech to be given at all. Not only would it save on security costs, it would save energy and not ruin the TV programming that night. :)

  63. #63
    On January 16th, 2011 at 10:43 am, happyscrapper said:

    On January 15th, 2011 at 11:43 pm, swede said:

    Tell Rags I miss him here! I can’t figure out why he would be banned.

    As far as Phil is concerned, he has many good posts, but yes, he is a bit schitzophrenic. I have mentioned this before. When I first started posting here, I asked an innocent question and he went off on me, called me a troll, amongst other things. I was appalled and frankly, intimidated. I thought about not posting here any more because I thought I would be blasted if I said something wrong. That was thanks to Phil. I do believe he is a true Conservative, just a bit over the top and a bit hair-trigger! (Sorry for that “violent” reference!)

  64. #64
    On January 16th, 2011 at 10:46 am, happyscrapper said:

    Ayotte
    Collins
    McCain
    Murkowski
    Snowe

    Make note of these names. Put them up on your refrigerator. Put them on your calendar for their next election. These are the people we need to get rid of if we are to save our country! There are others who have to go, of course. But these are some of the worst, most constant offenders. Murkowski, Collins and Snowe ARE NOT REPUBLICANS! I have no idea why they ran as such. Why don’t they just be honest and change to dem? Did I say “honest”? Therein lies your answer.

  65. #65
    On January 16th, 2011 at 5:32 pm, swede said:

    happyscrapper said:
    Tell Rags I miss him here! I can’t figure out why he would be banned.

    Will do. Yeah, most folks here say the same. Why don’t you drop a comment on his blog? He’d appreciate it! Don’t think he’d want his email posted here. Rags did get drawn into some mud slingin’ with Phil and R4L, but he said nothing worse than they did. Getting him booted was way over the top spiteful and vindictive.

    I do believe he is a true Conservative, just a bit over the top and a bit hair-trigger! (Sorry for that “violent” reference!)

    I think the whole Barry/Harry/Nanny nightmare has weighed heavily on a lot of us – but it binds most of us together in common purpose, no? Phil seems to have lost track of who the enemy is. I used to enjoy dialogue with Phil, and still respect his opinion when he’s not condescending and snarky, which is more and more. Geez, I’m thinking some of have been here 4-5-6 years already. You and most others make it like family. Appreciate your take – Allways dead on target. Dang! Hate speech breach! Storm troopers at the door…I think I’m in big

  66. #66
    On January 16th, 2011 at 6:32 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Somebody better tell Michelle that I have the power to banish people from her blog. I’m sure that’s news to her too. How can anyone be trusted with such awesome power?

  67. #67
    On January 16th, 2011 at 11:17 pm, eCurmudgeon said:

    I have a better (and cheaper) solution to this pressing, critical issue; let OweBowMao give the address from the Oval Office. That would save big on security costs, no?

    Better still, Boehner should grow a pair and withdraw the invitation to President Obama to enter the House of Representatives. Instead, the President can submit the State of a Union address as a written letter (which was actually the custom in the early days of the United States):

    From Wikipedia:

    In 1801, Thomas Jefferson discontinued the practice of delivering the address in person, regarding it as too monarchical (similar to the Speech from the Throne). Instead, the address was written and then sent to Congress to be read by a clerk until 1913 when Woodrow Wilson re-established the practice despite some initial controversy.

    One custom I’d very much like to see return…

  68. #68
    On January 16th, 2011 at 11:51 pm, rightisright said:

    she’s from N.H. what else would you expect, said from experience as I live in Orygun. the same would apply here. The last Republican senator we had was a RINO also. ran the family veggie canning company with accusations of using illegals but he wouldn’t use E-Verify. I did not vote him in his last re-election attempt in ’08. In ways I was wrong for that, in ways I was right and all RINOs need to lean the lesson.

  69. #69
    On January 16th, 2011 at 11:57 pm, rightisright said:

    Are they going to sing com buy yuuu before or after the propaganda speech or both times?

    ——-

    the left is trying to minimize the last election anyway they can…let’s see what the new congress has to say about all this “can’t we all just get along” crap.

    —–

    I’m waiting for when the time is right and Boehner tells Odummy…”we won”. a phrase Odoppy seem to relish saying himself.

  70. #70
    On January 17th, 2011 at 6:48 am, ErinF said:

    Would they have done this for W? After 9/11? Don’t think so.

  71. #71
    On January 17th, 2011 at 10:43 am, happyscrapper said:

    On January 16th, 2011 at 5:32 pm, swede said:
    mud slingin’ with Phil and R4L

    Hey Swede…was R4L banned too? Here’s hoping. I do believe that was the one I had problems with too…very stubborn…his/her way or the highway as I recall. And pretty much called me an old fool…emphasis on the “old”.

    I hope you are o.k. Did you get rid of the storm troopers? If I was there, I would have used my cast iron skillet on them, and probably been put into a re-education camp.

    Oh, as for posting on Rag’s blog, I tried to get into it a couple times but wasn’t able to. Maybe I am just dense, but it didn’t seem very user friendly and I gave up. I’ll try again.

  72. #72
    On January 17th, 2011 at 2:57 pm, swede said:

    Pasadena Phil said:

    Since the thread is dead, I’ll play.

    My question @#41 was intentionally and obviously loaded, and you answered exactly as expected. Ad hominem – RINO. If you answer, it exposes your hypocricy. You’re using the RINO card exactly as the libs use the race card. If someone disagrees with you…RINO! You do realize among most conservatives, your devaluing traditional conservative social values (pro life etc) makes you a defacto RINO, right? I don’t agree with them either.

    Have you done anything to make a difference other than post blog comments? RINO. CINO. Whatever. Don’t really expect a reasonable response, but give it a shot. Oh spit – Hate speech again.

  73. #73
    On January 17th, 2011 at 3:23 pm, swede said:

    happyscrapper said:

    I think R4 is still about, but like other roaches, doesn’t like the light. He actually posted somewhere that he does his shtick because he likes to mix it up. At least Phil has a position he’s defending.

    I hope you are o.k. Did you get rid of the storm troopers? If I was there, I would have used my cast iron skillet on them, and probably been put into a re-education camp.

    I AM VERY FINE! GOD BLESS AMERICA help! AND THE PRESIDENT! FOX NEWS IS EVIL! THANK GOD FOR OBAMACARE…

    Yeah, I’ve suggested Rags try a another provider. WordPress offers free blogs that are much more comment friendly. Now he’s talking about putting some cash into a really good format. I’m trying to fill in and keep content fresh when he gets busy with the real world. Don’t even really care who reads it. Taking all this frustration and anger and writing about it is kinda theraputic. Like a punching bag with Barry’s face on it…Oh no! Here they come again.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Subscribe to the Michelle Malkin newsletter

February 22, 2012 12:44 PM by Michelle Malkin

33 Comments

Surprise: UK’s Version of ‘Buffett Rule’ Failing to Bring in Expected Revenue

February 22, 2012 11:05 AM by Doug Powers

47 Comments

Pency-wise, pound foolish

The high priests of eco-destruction

February 22, 2012 07:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

119 Comments

Carney: Obama Didn’t Deny Keystone Permit

February 21, 2012 04:45 PM by Doug Powers

82 Comments

Republican politics killed the pipeline

Gallup: Unemployment Climbing Back to 9% for February

February 21, 2012 02:56 PM by Doug Powers

70 Comments

At least gas prices are dropping — wait, nevermind

Disability Claims Up As Unemployment Benefits Run Out

February 19, 2012 11:16 PM by Doug Powers

70 Comments

One of Obama’s Biggest Opponents in 2012

February 19, 2012 02:54 PM by Doug Powers

109 Comments

Gas pains

It Wouldn’t Be Saturday Morning Without Another Friday Night Solyndra Document Dump to Sift Through

February 18, 2012 09:52 AM by Doug Powers

41 Comments

Selective transparency under cover of weekend, part VI


Categories: Politics

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook