See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On January 20th, 2011 at 10:11 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

   being a Tea Party-bashing liberal means never having to say you’re sorry.

   So we can’t call them Sorry SOBs? Perish the thought! But bash away Jose Lambiet-we of the Right (as in Correct) are made of sterner stuff and think your little temper tantrums are cute.

   Enjoyed your apperance on Hannity–Back in Their Face when they pull this nonsense
   “moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue“.
   ===
   Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
   should be a convenience store,
   NOT a government agency.

2. #2
   On January 20th, 2011 at 10:12 am, letget said:

   Oh for crying out loud! Idiots at the palm beach post how long did it take you to find this smear?
   L

3. #3
   On January 20th, 2011 at 10:13 am, babiesgrandma said:

   That’s because Lemole’s mom and pop, heart surgeon Gerald Lemole and his wife, Emily, live in a $7.1 million house on The Island. They also own a more modest $3.5 million house, also in Palm Beach.

   Class Warfare. Incite bonehead liberals to turn against the Job Creators. Gross. It’s Chaos, once again, folks.

4. #4
   On January 20th, 2011 at 10:20 am, walterc said:

   Every time I start to think we’ve reached the limit and are about to back away from total anarchy, we take another step into the abyss.

5. #5
   On January 20th, 2011 at 10:24 am, John Deaux said:

   This bozo writes the celebrity gossip column. He’s like a Perez Hilton wannabe.

6. #6
   On January 20th, 2011 at 10:25 am, Truesoldier said:

   Ironically: Among their favorites are some of the very people whose controversial rhetoric and campaigns are said to provide a fertile ground for the likes of Jared Loughner, who allegedly injured Giffords and killed six others in Tucson.

   You got to love it when all the evidence points to Loughner being the killer is called alleged, but when none of the evidence points to Tea Party or anything on the right being at fault it is still considered a fact by the left.

7. #7
   On January 20th, 2011 at 10:28 am, beenthere said:

   Notice how civil the language is (no “tea-bagger” stuff)? Notice also that the piece is little more than a soft sneer, and of course there is no refuting a sneer. What can you do to respond? Nothing. If you get angry reading the thing and contact the writer (or paper) to inform him of your revulsion at what he has written, you are the one guilty of poisoning the political atmosphere with violent rhetoric or some such. If you ignore it, the creature stands unopposed. If you send a thoughtful critique, it will just be ignored (though they might print a raging screed to show how superior they are). They box us in effortlessly.

8. #8
   On January 20th, 2011 at 10:29 am, txvet2 said:

   But remember…being a Tea Party-bashing liberal means never having to say you’re sorry. prove you’re sane.

   There. Fixed it.

9. #9
   On January 20th, 2011 at 10:32 am, drivingjack said:

   Do they think only the GOP have wealthy folks? What about most of Hollywood, George Soros half of the NBA, NFL and MLB and the Kennedys?

10. #10
    On January 20th, 2011 at 10:41 am, txvet2 said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 10:32 am, drivingjack said:

    Do they think only the GOP have wealthy folks

    Another nice thing about being a leftist is that you aren’t required to even notice, much less explain, such contradictions. Just like Chap yesterday with the abortion murderer, you simply voice a couple of general platitudes and change the subject.

11. #11
    On January 20th, 2011 at 10:56 am, verogolfer said:

    The Palm Beach Post has always been a very liberal paper but this guy is bizarre. At one time the Post did have ethics. It’s sad to see that day is over.

12. #12
    On January 20th, 2011 at 10:57 am, J S Ragman said:

    whose controversial rhetoric and campaigns are said to provide a fertile ground

    Only by you, Jose.

13. #13
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:09 am, hawkeye54 said:

    He’s like a Perez Hilton wannabe.

    Man, that is really setting the bar as low as you can get.

    being a Tea Party-bashing liberal means never having to say you’re sorry. prove you’re sane realizing you are mentally ill.

    .

    and stubbornly refusing treatment at that.

14. #14
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:12 am, TigerLady said:

    drivingjack said:
    Do they think only the GOP have wealthy folks? What about most of Hollywood, George Soros half of the NBA, NFL and MLB and the Kennedys?

    There you go. Trying to inject common sense into an argument. Of course it’s different if your a wealthy lib.

15. #15
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:17 am, jlhudg23 said:

    the likes of Jared Loughner, who allegedly injured Giffords and killed six others in Tucson

    You can always tell the nutcase sympathizers/enablers: they simply cannot bring themselves to deal with objective reality, preferring always (at least as relates to actions they don’t want to be blamed for) to stay in the world of “nuanced supposition”. Thus, Loughner cannot be said to have actually injured or killed anyone, despite the absolute certainty of the facts of the case. Rather, he can only be “alleged” to have done so.

16. #16
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:22 am, Truesoldier said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:17 am, jlhudg23 said: Thus, Loughner cannot be said to have actually injured or killed anyone, despite the absolute certainty of the facts of the case. Rather, he can only be “alleged” to have done so.

    In all actuality it is more out of legal necesity than anything else to use the word alleged. This is to avoid screwing up the case by giving the lawyer ammo (can I say ammo now…)to say that their clients rights to being presumed innocent are being violated and that any potential jury pool is being tainted.

17. #17
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:25 am, Truesoldier said:

    drivingjack said:
    Do they think only the GOP have wealthy folks? What about most of Hollywood, George Soros half of the NBA, NFL and MLB and the Kennedys?

    Here is the Orwellian translation of that situation in a liberals mind:

    Rich Conservatives are bad, becasue they donate to Conservative causes that are not appoved by the “enlightened elite”

    Rich Liberals are good, because they donate to the causes of “the greater good of society” (i.e. liberal ideals).

18. #18
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:27 am, John Deaux said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:09 am, hawkeye54 said:

    He’s like a Perez Hilton wannabe.

    Man, that is really setting the bar as low as you can get.

    He pronounces his name Joe-say, not Hoe-zay. Need I say more?

19. #19
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:28 am, txvet2 said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:17 am, jlhudg23 said:

    You can always tell the nutcase sympathizers/enablers: they simply cannot bring themselves to deal with objective reality, preferring always (at least as relates to actions they don’t want to be blamed for) to stay in the world of “nuanced supposition”.

    Which is how OJ stayed out of jail.

20. #20
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:32 am, Buy Danish said:

    Rich Palm Beach Democrats: Good
    Rich Palm Beach Republicans: Evil

21. #21
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:33 am, ACHefty said:

    What can you do to respond? Nothing.

    What should we do? Nothing. Just keep on our own message.

    Projecting Rogue Cheddar:

    Commander William T. Riker: What do we do now, Captain? With their monitoring our every move and every word?
    Captain Jean-Luc Picard: We do exactly what we’d do if this Q never existed. If we’re going to be damned, let’s be damned for what we really are.

    Apologies, Cheddar. Now go get me some Dutch Edam, Gouda, and Ritz Crackers!

22. #22
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:34 am, hawkeye54 said:

    Rich Palm Beach Democrats: GoodGodlike in perfection.

    Rich Palm Beach Republicans: EvilThe personification of Satan

    FIFY

23. #23
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:35 am, AlohaGuy said:

    Gotta love that passive voice to try and escape accountability for trafficking a baseless smear: “Are said to provide.”

    This allows the stupid trolls to show up and claim no one actually said Palin was responsible. I’m not sure their pea brains really think that, or if they think it’s some sort of gotcha, but intellectually they provide nothing of value to this earth, nor the people on it.

24. #24
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:37 am, AlohaGuy said:

    Palm Beach Post columnist smears Tea Party parents of Giffords’ doctor envious of successful people

    The value of their house? They live in Palm Beach, they have valuable property. Duh.

25. #25
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:39 am, chapoutier said:

    Just like Chap yesterday with the abortion murderer, you simply voice a couple of general platitudes and change the subject.

    You claim you are not obsessed yet awkwardly try to segue this topic into another silly statement about me?

    Sad.

26. #26
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:48 am, txvet2 said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:39 am, chapoutier said:

    No, once again your ego (and paranoia) doesn’t let you believe that any comment on any subject isn’t about you personally. You weren’t the only one on the board yesterday. On the other hand, you do make a beautiful case in point of a liberal who is a shallow as a water puddle on the sidewalk when it comes to actually explaining the leftist position on virtually anything.

27. #27
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:51 am, chapoutier said:

    On the other hand, you do make a beautiful case in point of a liberal who is a shallow as a water puddle on the sidewalk when it comes to actually explaining the leftist position on virtually anything.

    As I said on that thread, there have been several other threads where I discuss my views on abortion in much greater detail. You are welcome to seek these out.

    But I am not your little monkey-boy. I am not required to produce a treatise on any particular position just because you think you are entitled to it. Nor are you particularly clever in asserting the shallowness of a position simply because you are too lazy and intellectually fraudulent to see if I have said more about it in the past.

28. #28
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:54 am, chapoutier said:

    No, once again your ego (and paranoia) doesn’t let you believe that any comment on any subject isn’t about you personally. You weren’t the only one on the board yesterday.

    Oh and you are also lying, or have an incredibly selective memory. You SPECIFICALLY mentioned me by name yesterday when trying to solicit some reaction on that thread. As you do on half th threads you comment on.

    But nope. You’re not obsessed. It is just my paranoia reading my name coming up every time you post.

29. #29
    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:59 am, txvet2 said:

    Oops, you’re right. I did mention you specifically. Should have reread my own post.

    You see, Chap, it isn’t “obsession” to try to get the left to actually support and defend their positions on issues. It’s “debate”.

    You’re not my little monkey? Silly child. You’re a little windup toy and I have the key. I make you jump anytime I care to.

30. #30
    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:05 pm, txvet2 said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:54 am, chapoutier said:

    As you do on half th threads you comment on.

    By the way, that’s known in the legal profession as a “baldfaced lie”.

31. #31
    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:08 pm, MrFreeman07 said:

    Ecclesiastes 10:2
    The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.

32. #32
    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:12 pm, tre said:

    Thanks to God and Michael Lemole’s skill, Gabrielle Giffords has been making a miraculous recovery.

    And all they care about is that his parents are Conservatives!

    No good deed ever goes unpunished.

33. #33
    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:13 pm, flmom said:

    txvet2: Ma, make him stop, he keeps looking at me!!

    Chap: He did it first!!

34. #34
    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:15 pm, txvet2 said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:13 pm, flmom said:

    Well, he did!!

35. #35
    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:15 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Coffin, meet nail. Their insanity is no longer in question. This is definitely political theatre at its best!! Stocking up on snacks for a long winter of watching the regressives crash and burn. Sorry if that is too violent for you.

    Beenthere said:They box us in effortlessly.

    They only box us in if we allow it!! They only force us to shun certain words if we allow it!! Let them make fools of themselves. We don’t have to follow their lead on ANYTHING! Just remember that! They must not be allowed to define the issues! Write that down on your hand and refer to it often.

36. #36
    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:31 pm, RedDog said:

    Palm Beach Post columnist Jose Lambiet is using the Tucson massacre to attack the parents of one of Democrat Rep. Gabrielle Giffords’ surgeons because they happen to be GOP donors and Tea Party supporters.

    Jose and his limp Left friends just cannot let it go – like a crazed chihuahua on the pantleg. Did he expect the doctor would have euthanized Rep. Giffords because his parents are Conservative? Looks like Jose ClassEnvy wants some of that million dollar house action. Boo hoo. Get a real job and you may own one someday kid. And why is Jose still employed at the paper?

37. #37
    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:40 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:33 am, ACHefty said:
    Apologies, Cheddar. Now go get me some Dutch Edam, Gouda, and Ritz Crackers!

    What no Wensleydale? Peasant!

38. #38
    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:49 pm, ACHefty said:

    I thought you were talking to me, Mr. Wensleydale.

    Better make that smoked Gouda and English Cheddar. And bring a diet cola while you’re at it!

39. #39
    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:51 pm, ACHefty said:

    And why is Jose still employed at the paper?

    Because that’s what editors like to have in their newsrooms.

40. #40
    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:54 pm, flmom said:

    And bring a diet cola while you’re at it!

    My, I think I have the vapors, diet coke with cheese?!!

41. #41
    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:57 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 12:54 pm, flmom said:
    My, I think I have the vapors, diet coke with cheese?!!

    If the cheese don’t get you, the aspartame will!

42. #42
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:09 pm, ACHefty said:

    Eat well. Stay fit. Die anyway. Mortality is not just the leading cause of death. It’s the only cause.

    You should try it. Diet cola and cheese go well together. It’s almost as good as chocolate-covered bacon.

43. #43
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:13 pm, flmom said:

    If the cheese don’t get you, the aspartame will!

    Only real sugar for me, preferably fermented with grapes.

44. #44
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:14 pm, spaceycakes said:

    jlhudg23 said:

    exactly; I thought the same thing.

45. #45
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:14 pm, flmom said:

    ACHefty said:

    I’ll take your word for it.

46. #46
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:15 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Oh, I prefer Stilton with McVities digestive biscuits. OoOooOoooOO heaven

47. #47
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:17 pm, flmom said:

    Spaceycakes, don’t forget the wedges of apple, then, and only then, you have heaven.

48. #48
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:18 pm, ACHefty said:

    Every year on Christmas Eve, the children leave Cheese and diet cola on the table for “Daddy Claus” to enjoy. When that happens, life is good.

    See that, liberals? Civil discourse over subjects where people disagree. Start small, and you may eventually become as civil — and smart — as us.

49. #49
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:18 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Chap wrote

    But I am not your little monkey-boy. I am not required to produce a treatise on any particular position just because you think you are entitled to it.

    Good. Now you understand that people who are not citizens are not entitled to health care, nor is anyone entitled to money, education, reparations, a house, car, boat ect.

    I think you’re making REAL progess, not just the civilization-destroying “progressive” kind.

50. #50
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:21 pm, ACHefty said:

    Spaceycakes, don’t forget the wedges of apple, then, and only then, you have heaven.

    Berries of all kinds are quite nice, too. And some form of carnage. Smoked beef jerky, summer sausage, cotto salami, bacon-wrapped water chestnuts. Any combination.

    I just ate, but I’m already hungry again!

51. #51
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:22 pm, txvet2 said:

    I prefer fried ice cream.

52. #52
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:28 pm, spaceycakes said:

    No fruit for me. I like a lime in my gin, though.

53. #53
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:36 pm, happyscrapper said:

    chocolate-covered bacon.

    Yum! Me want some!

54. #54
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:42 pm, fred5676 said:

    Jose (who can’t see) would probably be much happier if the wealthy heart surgeon and his successful neurosurgeon son had both made better career choices and gone to Columbia J school, become hacks at the NYT, and lived in cramped NYC apartments, instead of saving thousands of lives and living comfortably in FL and AZ.

    Ah, liberalism!!!

55. #55
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:47 pm, ACHefty said:

    I prefer fried ice cream.

    Ooooooohhhh. Now you’re talkin’! Especially after stuffing the gullet full of chicken fajitas.

56. #56
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:53 pm, mytake said:

    Just when you think the press can’t go any lower, they move from the basement into the septic tank.

57. #57
    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:56 pm, mytake said:

    And how about that boy who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth and still got off his ass and got an MD degree. Guess he is going to be a rich sob, too! Maybe he’ll give money to the Dems and all will be forgiven.

58. #58
    On January 20th, 2011 at 2:59 pm, d1carter said:

    Liberalism is a mental illness…

59. #59
    On January 20th, 2011 at 3:02 pm, reshas1 said:

    Email Jose Lambiet at mailto:jlambiet@pbpost.com.com

60. #60
    On January 20th, 2011 at 3:09 pm, tarpon said:

    Liberalism is a mental disease.

61. #61
    On January 20th, 2011 at 3:11 pm, Ron said:

    Example #8,375 that liberals are the ones who practice hate speech, not conservatives. Practice is a bad word. They’ve actually perfected it and institutionalized it on their web sites, cable outlets and mainstream media wastelands.

62. #62
    On January 20th, 2011 at 3:22 pm, martin.musculus said:

    
    On January 20, 2011 at 10:28 am, beenthere said:
    Notice how civil the language is (no “tea-bagger” stuff)? Notice also that the piece is little more than a soft sneer, and of course there is no refuting a sneer. What can you do to respond? Nothing. If you get angry reading the thing and contact the writer (or paper) to inform him of your revulsion at what he has written, you are the one guilty of poisoning the political atmosphere with violent rhetoric or some such. If you ignore it, the creature stands unopposed.
    …

    (Hope this works right… Grandson gave his “Old-Pops” – me, a Droid for Christmas, and its behaviour when entering text while commenting on blog items is *odd* to say the least…)
    While dealing w/Progie’s “soft-sneer”, I have found that the most important thing to do is to cause *them* to rip the veneer-of-reasonableness they cloak themselves in.
    You’re *never* going to change a Progressive’s mind, (they lack the functionality…), that’s the mistake too many of the Punditry make. Instead your thrust must be over their stunted Humanity to their audience.
    Of the multitude of methods, my personal favorites involve asking “have you ever stopped beating your wife?” queries feared at the Progie’s favorite cause. The immediately go so ballistic that any audience sprints for cover to avoid being awash in oral-foam.

63. #63
    On January 20th, 2011 at 3:37 pm, RedDog said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:18 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Chap wrote

    But I am not your little monkey-boy. I am not required to produce a treatise on any particular position just because you think you are entitled to it.

    chap…. I’m your monkey-boy.

64. #64
    On January 20th, 2011 at 3:42 pm, reshas1 said:

    http://www.page2live.com/2011/01/18/palm-beach-folks-of-giffords-doc-supported-tea-partier-christine-odonnell/#comments

65. #65
    On January 20th, 2011 at 4:00 pm, spaceycakes said:

    If you ignore it, the creature stands unopposed.

    Nice. That’s how we came to where we are today.

66. #66
    On January 20th, 2011 at 4:06 pm, rambler said:

    We need “boycott a liberal day”.

67. #67
    On January 20th, 2011 at 5:13 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    What’s a monkey-boy? Forgive my lack of knowledge….I got all caught up in the cheese, fruit, berries discussion.

68. #68
    On January 20th, 2011 at 5:35 pm, txvet2 said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 5:13 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    What’s a monkey-boy?

    I don’t know, but apparently Chap is sort of defensive about it.

69. #69
    On January 20th, 2011 at 7:09 pm, corkie said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 11:39 am, chapoutier said:

    Sad.

    chapoutier, why do you always have to make everything about you?

70. #70
    On January 20th, 2011 at 7:52 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 1:21 pm, ACHefty said:
    Berries of all kinds are quite nice, too. And some form of carnage. Smoked beef jerky, summer sausage, cotto salami, bacon-wrapped water chestnuts. Any combination.

    Stop! You had me at chocolate covered bacon!

71. #71
    On January 20th, 2011 at 7:54 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On January 20th, 2011 at 3:37 pm, RedDog said:
    chap…. I’m your monkey-boy.

    Is that anything like “I’ll be your huckleberry”?