The real snow job in D.C.: Obamacare waivers skyrocket to 729 + 4 states; 4 new SEIU waiver winners

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 26, 2011 08:20 PM

The nation’s capital is freaking out over a winter snowstorm.

But everyone else should be up in arms over the real snow job in Washington this week.

While the Democrats continued to extol Obamacare and the president defended the behemoth law during the Date of the Union, HHS was quietly presiding over a massive Obamacare Waiver-mania explosion.

When last we examined the growing list, privileged escapees topped 222.

Now: The list now at 729 — plus 4 states (Massachusetts, New Jersey, Ohio, and Tennessee).

Among the many new union refugees are 4 new SEIU locals :

-SEIU Health and Welfare fund, 2000 with 161 enrollees

-Service Employees 32BJ North Health Benefit Fund* representing 7,020 enrollees

-SEIU Local 300, Civil Service Forum Employees Welfare Fund representing 2,000 enrollees

-SEIU Health & Welfare Fund representing 1,620

This is in addition to the three other previous SEIU waiver winners: Local 25 SEIU in Chicago with 31,000 enrollees; Local 1199 SEIU Greater New York Benefit Fund with 4,544 enrollees; and SEIU Local 1 Cleveland Welfare Fund with 520 enrollees.

Which brings the total number of Obamacare-promoting SEIU Obamacare escapees to an estimated 45,000 workers represented by seven SEIU locals.

HHS puts the total number of union waiver recipients at 182:

Collectively-Bargained Employer-Based Plan Applicants: Most of the other health plans receiving waivers are multi-employer health funds created by a collective bargaining agreement between a union and two or more employers, pursuant to the Taft-Hartley Act. These “union plans” are employment based group health plans and operate for the sole benefit of workers. They tend to be larger than other typical group health plans because they cover multiple employers. There are also single-employer union plans that have received a waiver. In total, 182 collectively-bargained plans have received waivers.

The rest:

Of all the waivers granted to date:

* Employment-Based Coverage: The vast majority – 712 plans representing 97 percent of all waivers – were granted to health plans that are employment-related.

o Self-Insured Employer Plans Applicants: Employer-based health plans received most of the waivers – 359.

o Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs): HRAs are employer-funded group health plans where employees are reimbursed tax-free for qualified medical expenses up to a maximum dollar amount for a coverage period. In total, HHS has approved 171 applications for waivers for HRAs.

* Health Insurers: Sixteen waivers were granted to health insurers, which can apply for a waiver for multiple mini-med products sold to employers or individuals.

* State Governments: Four waivers have gone to State governments. States may apply for a waiver of the restricted annual limits on behalf of issuers of state-mandated policies if state law required the policies to be offered by the issuers prior to September 23, 2010.

***

A snort-worthy new escapee: Obamacare sympathizers at The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, whose board of trustees includes Obama health care czar Nancy-Ann DeParle.

Culture of Corruption – DeParle flashback:

Former Kansas Democrat Governor Kathleen Sebelius won Senate confirmation as Health and Human Services Secretary. But the real power lies with with newly-created health czar Nancy-Ann Min DeParle. Her official title: Director of the White House Office for Health Reform.

DeParle ran the behemoth Medicare and Medicaid programs under Bill Clinton. She parlayed her government experience into a lucrative private-sector stint. Over the past three years, she made nearly $6 million from her work in the health care industry. Despite President Obama’s loud denunciations of the revolving-door lobbyist culture in Washington, DeParle’s industry ties didn’t bother the White House.

She served as an investment advisor at JP Morgan Partners, LLC; sat on the board of directors at Boston Scientific Corporation; and held directorships at Accredo Health Group Inc., Triad Hospitals (now part of Community Health Systems), and DaVita Corporation. In all, she sat on at least ten boards while advising JP Morgan and working as managing director at a private equity firm, CCMP Capital.

From 2002 to 2008, while holding all those titles, DeParle also served as a member of the government-chartered Medicare Payment Advisory Committee (MedPAC), an influential panel that advises Congress on what Medicare should cover and at what price. Last month, former MedPAC member DeParle cozily announced that Obama was “open to making recommendations of [MedPAC] mandatory unless opposed by a joint resolution of Congress.”

Obama famously signed an early executive order requiring appointees to pledge not to participate “in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to any former employer or former clients” for a period of two years from the date of his or her appointment. But it’s hard to imagine any health care reform-related issue that won’t involve one of DeParle’s former employers, clients, and corporate boards in the health care industry. She earned at least $376,000 from Cerner Corporation, for example, which specializes in health information technology. As health czar, DeParle has unmeasured clout in directing $19 billion of federal stimulus money earmarked for, yes, health information technology.

Last week, a Washington, D.C. citizen watchdog filed suit to force the White House to disclose which health care lobbyists and executives it had met with this year to discuss insurance takeover legislation. White House counsel Greg Craig refused to disclose which administration officials attended the meetings. But at least two of the industry visitors have ties to DeParle. William C. Weldon is chairman of Johnson & Johnson, which paid DeParle $7,500 for a recent speech. Wayne Smith is chief executive of Community Health Systems, which merged with Triad Hospitals – where DeParle served on the board of directors. DeParle’s options were converted to cash payments worth $1.05 million.

Despite Obama’s lip service to transparency, the public is in the dark about which assets DeParle has divested and how many times, if any, DeParle has recused herself from policy matters and meetings. Czardom has its privileges.

***

More details on the union recipients:

Allied Building Inspectors IUOE Local 211 Welfare Fund

Bridge, Structural, Ornamental & Reinforcing Ironworkers Local Union No. 60*

Bridge, Structural, Ornamental & Reinforcing Ironworkers Local Union No. 60*

Employer-Teamsters Local Nos. 175 & 505 Health and Welfare Fund

IBEW Local 3 NYC Electrical Division Health & Welfare Fund

Indiana Area UFCW Union Locals and Retail Food Employers’ Health and Welfare Plan

Laborers’ District Council of Virginia Health and Welfare Trust Fund

Laborers National Health and Welfare Fund

Local 1245 Health Fund

Local 295 Welfare Fund

Local 381 Group Insurance Fund

Local 805 Welfare Fund

Pipe Fitters’ Welfare Fund, Local 597*

District Council 1707 Local 389 Home Care Employees Health & Welfare Fund

Health and Welfare Plan of the Laundry, Dry Cleaning Workers & Allied Industry Health Fund, Workers United

Northern Illinois and Iowa Laborers Health and Welfare Fund

United Food and Commercial Workers Retail Employees and Employers Health and Welfare Plan

Board of Trustees for the Operating Engineers Local 101 Health and Welfare Fund

Carpenters Local No. 491 Health & Welfare Plan

Central Laborers’ Welfare Fund

Electrical Workers Health and Welfare Fund

Health Care Employees Dental and Medical Trust

Hotel, Restaurant & Bar Employees Health and Welfare Fund

IBEW Local Union No. 126 Health and Welfare Fund

International Union of Operating Engineers, Supplemental Benefit Fund Local 409*

Local 888 UFCW

Midwest Teamsters

Northern Minnesota-Wisconsin Area Retail Food Health & Welfare Fund

Roofers Local #96 Health & Welfare Fund

Security Benefit Fund of the Uniformed Firefighters Association of New York City

Roofers Local 8 Insurance & Trust Fund

***

The HHS list has been completely re-numbered and re-ordered, so it’s difficult to delineate where the new enlistees end. Here’s just a sampling/reminder of other union beneficiaries of Waiver-mania:

Teamsters Union Local # 35

U.A. Local 13 & Employers Group Insurance Plan*

UFCW & Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Health & Welfare Fund

UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund

UFCW Local One Health Care Fund

Local 237 Teamsters Suffolk Regional Off-Track Betting Corp. Health and Welfare Trust Fund

Roofers Local #96 Health & Welfare Fund

Superior Officers Council Health and Welfare Fund

Service Employees International Union Local 1 Cleveland Welfare Fund

Service Employees Benefit Fund

1199SEIU Greater New York Benefit Fund

Teamsters Local Union 966 Health Fund

IBEW Local Union No. 728 Family Healthcare Plan

Communications Workers of America, Local 1180 Security Benefits Fund

Florida Laborers Health Fund

Electricians Health, Welfare & Pension Plans I.B.E.W. Local Union No. 995

NECA-IBEW Local 480 Health and Welfare Plan

Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 177 Health and Welfare, Pension and Vacation Funds

South Central Laborers’ Health & Welfare Fund

Theatrical Teamsters Local 817 IBT Welfare Fund

IBEW Local Union No. 728 Family Healthcare Plan

Sports Arena Employees’ Local 137 Welfare Fund

Truck Drivers and Helpers Local 355 Health and Welfare Fund

Health and Welfare Fund of the Detectives’ Endowment Association, Inc. Police Department City of New York

Amalgamated, Industrial and Toy & Novelty Workers of America, Local 223 Sick Benefit Fund

Atlanta Plumbers & Steamfitters Fringe Benefit Funds

Central Texas Health and Benefit Trust Fund Locals 520, 60 & 72

Electricians Health, Welfare & Pension Plans I.B.E.W. Local Union No. 995

Florida Laborers Health Fund

IBEW Local No. 640 and Arizona Chapter NECA Health & Welfare Trust Fund

NECA-IBEW Local 480 Health and Welfare Plan

Plumbers and Pipefitters Welfare Fund of Local Union No. 719

Southeastern Pipetrades Health & Welfare Fund

UFCW Local 1262 and Employers Health & Welfare Fund

Plumbers Local Union No. 690 of Philadelphia and Vicinity Health Plan

United Food & Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund

Construction Workers Local 147 Welfare Fund

Blasters, Drillers &Miners Union Local No. 29 Welfare Fund

International Union ofBricklayers & Allied Craftworkers

Construction Workers Local 147 Welfare Fund

Local 298 HealthBenefit Fund Plan

Local 803 Health and Welfare Fund

Louisiana Laborers Health and Welfare Fund

Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union 823 Health & Welfare Fund

Plumbers & Steamfitters Local No. 6 Health and Welfare Fund

Southwestern Teamsters Security Fund

Teamsters Local 455 Welfare Plan

Teamsters Local 210 Affiliated Health and Insurance Fund

Teamsters Welfare Fund of Northern New Jersey Local 1723

United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 1000 and Kroger Dallas Health and Welfare Plan

UNITE HERE Local 74 Welfare and Dental Trust

United Service Employees Union, Local 377, RWDSU, UFCW

IBEW Local 613 and Contributing Employers Family Health Plan (Union

Bricklayers Local 1 of MD, VA and DC

I.B.E.W. Local 1249 Insurance Fund**

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers**

International Brotherhood of Trade Unions Health and Welfare Fund – Local 713

International Union of Operating Engineers Local 295-295C Welfare Trust Fund**

International union of Operating Engineers, Local Union Number 137**

Iron Workers Local Union #28 Health and Welfare Fund**

Local 1102 Amalgamated Welfare Fund

Local 1102 Health & Benefit Fund

Local 1102 Welfare Fund– Lerner Employees

Local 272 Welfare Fund**

Local 338 Affiliated Benefit Funds

Michigan Conference of Teamsters Welfare Fund**

Minnesota and North Dakota Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers**

Operating Engineers Local 835 Health and Welfare Fund

Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 430 Health and Welfare Fund**

Retail, Wholesale & Dept. Store Union Local 1034 Welfare Fund

Sheet Metal Workers Funds of Local Union 38**

Teamsters Local 522 Welfare Fund Roofers Division

Teamsters Local Union 72 Welfare Fund**

UFCW Local 371 Amalgamated Welfare Fund**

United Crafts Benefits Fund**

United Food & Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Local No. 348 Health & Welfare Fund**

United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1445 New Hampshire

United Food and Commercial Workers Local 464a**

United Food and Commercial Workers Local 911**

United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1459 and Contributing Employers Health and Welfare Fund**

Alaska Pipe Trade U.A. Local 367 Health and Security Trust**

Plumbers and Pipefitters Local No. 630 Welfare Fund

United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 1000

United Wire, Metal & Machine Health & Welfare Fund**

Cleveland Bakers Teamsters

Laundry and Dry Cleaning Workers Local No. 52

Social Service Employees Union Local 371

United Food and Commercial Workers Union (Mount Laurel, NJ)

United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 1459

United Food and Commercial Workers and Participating Employers Interstate Health and Welfare Fund

Laborers’ International Union of North America Local Union No. 616 Health and Welfare Plan

UFCW Allied Trade Health & Welfare Trust

United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 1995

IBEW No.915

Asbestos Workers Local 53 Welfare Fund

Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 123 Welfare Fund

UFCW Local 227

UFCW Maximus Local 455

***

You can see the updated list for yourselves right here.

Big hat tip to John Sexton in the Hot Air Green Room, who reports the rather curious delays in HHS’s posting of the new updates:

Last year, the HHS website was very efficient posting a list of ObamaCare waivers that had been granted. Ususally by the 3rd of the month the list was updated to included waivers that had been approved in the previous month. But something happened in January. Two weeks into the month no new waivers had been posted.

I was curious what caused the delay so I made some calls. Last Tuesday I spoke by phone with a media relations employees of HHS. She was not allowed to speak on the record, but after checking with folks at OCIIO who handle the ObamaCare waivers, she was able to inform me in a “not for attribution” way that the latest batch of waivers had in fact been processed. There was no specific hold-up that she could identify, they were simply running behind in getting the information on the website.

Well today, the day after the President’s State of the Union, the new waivers are up. You may recall that there were 222 such waivers approved in November. That number has now jumped to 729 through the end of December. The total number of people covered by the waivers has gone from 1.5M to just under 2.2M. The list includes the usual assortment of union locals and businesses.

I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to suggest that OCIIO was asked to hold this development until after the SOTU. Indeed the latest waiver approved in the list is from December 30th. There is an addendum at the bottom of the page noting that four states–Massachusetts, New Jersey, Ohio, and Tennessee–have applied for waivers covering another 93,000 people. The addendum is dated 1/21/11, but I can assure you it was not there on 1/21 or even Monday…

More rich fodder for the House and Senate GOP probes of the Obamacare Waiver-mania program the Democrats don’t want to talk about…
***

Previous:

1/24/10 Investigating Obamacare Waiver-mania

12/7/10 Obamacare Waiver-mania! continues: List tops 222

11/19/10 The Obamacare Waiver-mania! movement builds

11/17/10 Dude, where’s my Obamacare waiver?

11/14/10 Waiver-mania! The ever-expanding Obamacare escapee list

10/6/10 Obamacare waivers: Torquemada Sebelius spares McDonald’s, unions

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Health care,SEIU,Unions

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On January 26th, 2011 at 8:35 pm, vickisoup said:

    A-ho!e$.

  2. #2
    On January 26th, 2011 at 8:38 pm, bjc said:

    *We were on our way to single payer as in Canada, but it appears Obamacare will eventually implode with all this waiver activity; The harsh light of reality has exposed this legislation for what it is, the worst in American history, unless you are (the) one and intent on destroying the country, as some of us believe.
    *The pressure will build against this monstrosity and expect the Senate to take up a vote on full repeal before April; Jim DeMint, among others, has a full repeal and replace bill in the works.
    *P-BO, one and done!

  3. #3
    On January 26th, 2011 at 8:41 pm, regularguy said:

    From affirmative action, to unequal tax rates for different levels of wage earners, to Obamacare waivers for cronies, I’m sure glad we all have equal protection under an evenly executed system of law.

  4. #4
    On January 26th, 2011 at 8:44 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    I need a waiver, I gotta join a union quick!

  5. #5
    On January 26th, 2011 at 8:58 pm, txvet2 said:

    Of course if the legislation is fully implemented, these waivers will mean nothing, because there won’t be any private insurance left to buy.

  6. #6
    On January 26th, 2011 at 9:01 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Yeah, how nice. I especially like the United Federation of Teachers Welfare Fund (351,000 enrollees) who prefer to suck the lifeblood out of taxpayers for their cushy Cadillac plans they certainly wouldn’t want to give up now, would they?

  7. #7
    On January 26th, 2011 at 9:08 pm, 123upnorth said:

    In 20 years, we will all be regularly travelling to China for healthcare. The chinese education system will tell their students how America used to be a capitalist country – free and prosperous, but how an unqualifed, Kenyan born man named Obama took America down a path that caused it to break and never recover. 200+ years of greatness destroyed in one 4 year term by an affirmative action liberal fantasy of presidency.

  8. #8
    On January 26th, 2011 at 9:10 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I love how Obama always says he wants to level the playing field and make everything “fair”. This is his idea of “fair”. What a moron. He doesn’t even realize how much his words and actions don’t match! He is seriously deluded and should NOT be leading the Free world! This is a very dangerous situation. I think he will crack.

  9. #9
    On January 26th, 2011 at 9:11 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Is everyone really sure we should ignore the fact that he’s ineligible?

    He told us he was ineligible when he said on his website that his citizenship at birth was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948.

    How can a Britsh subject be a natural born citizen?

  10. #10
    On January 26th, 2011 at 9:17 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I have applied for a waiver. I’ll let you know when it comes in…

  11. #11
    On January 26th, 2011 at 9:19 pm, 123upnorth said:

    Happy: the communist way is actually to control the masses and have a specialized, well-connected class of people who get special treatment as long as they keep the status quo going and the supreme leaders in power. Obama is doing exactly what he always dreamed of doing. He is establishing his communist dream in the U.S.A!!!

    Eventually, you will have to change what U.S.A. stands for. In the future, in might refer to the Unified Socialist Appropration.

  12. #12
    On January 26th, 2011 at 9:31 pm, 123upnorth said:

    Our top medical professional – head of the Canadian Medical Association says our system will be not be sustainable. Here is the link:

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,539943,00.html

    Hilariously sick thing is that while Americans can easily look to the North and see a public system that is clearly not working, Obama promotes universal healthcare and claims, along with his followers, that Canada’s system is working pretty well – absolutely stunning.

  13. #13
    On January 26th, 2011 at 9:53 pm, Flyoverman said:

    John Edwards was right. There are two Americas.

    The Progressives have created it. The politically favored and the serfs.

    Welcome to Zimbabwe.

  14. #14
    On January 26th, 2011 at 10:18 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Welcome to Zimbabwe.

    Kenyanesia. When you are born in Kenya and get Indonesian citizenship as a youth.

  15. #15
    On January 26th, 2011 at 10:18 pm, Ron said:

    I’ll tell you what, let’s ALL get a waiver…

  16. #16
    On January 26th, 2011 at 10:31 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    Hum…I was thinking that all persons born or naturalized…yada yada…were entitled to equal protection of the laws.

    Wouldn’t that also mean equal protection ~from~ the law? Don’t we all have a right to opt out if some of us do?

  17. #17
    On January 26th, 2011 at 10:38 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    The good news is that the appeals court is going to expedite hearing Judge Hudsons ruling in the Virginia case that Obamacare is uncontitutional. The sooner the courts kill this monster the better. (sorry for the vitiolic rhetoric)

    Congress has no authority to force anyone to buy anything. Judge Hudson will be upheld.

    If we still have any of the Constitution left. Since we surrendered Art II sec 1 in the last election, I’m not sure….

  18. #18
    On January 26th, 2011 at 10:51 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    123upnorth>> Hilariously sick thing is that while Americans can easily look to the North and see a public system that is clearly not working, Obama promotes universal healthcare and claims, along with his followers, that Canada’s system is working pretty well – absolutely stunning.

    Unfortunately, few Americans have seen the great French-Canadian film (English subtitles)”The Barbarian Invasion.” It is a comedy/drama that spends a lot of time showing us the hideous state of hospital care up north. A dying man is in a double room with some Pakistanis(?) who are cooking their tribal foods in the room, etc. Hideous crowding, although there is a whole floor that is closed off. A union thug is bribed to get the dying man moved to another room. Meanwhile, the wait for an MRI is ridiculously long so the patient’s son spirits him across the boarder to a U.S. hospital which is ridiculously clean and friendly and efficient…comically so. Still, the point is made. Get it from Netflix. Even the darn socialist French-Canadians mock their hideous system. (Warning: Assisted suicide of the terminally ill man is also a major theme, which many would undoubtedly find objectionable.)

  19. #19
    On January 26th, 2011 at 11:18 pm, prendad said:

    Let me see now. We have a BRAND SPANKING NEW

  20. #20
    On January 26th, 2011 at 11:19 pm, prendad said:

    health care bill and already there are over 700 waivers for it? Who is running the asylum here?

  21. #21
    On January 26th, 2011 at 11:33 pm, Texas T said:

    has anyone seen this story on Facebook yet? Sounds like a giant steaming pile of BS to me.

    http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/note.php?note_id=10150126227359540&id=696974223

    I expect a lot more stuff like this now.

  22. #22
    On January 27th, 2011 at 12:26 am, mojojojo said:

    I work for a small, local business with one location and no union attachment.

    I’ve received notice that my health care premium is going up 12% this year. Furthermore, my selected insurance plan is being discontinued in 2012, forcing me into to a plan that currently costs more than four times as much as I pay now. The insurance company has no estimate for the actual cost in 2012.

    I’m screwed.

  23. #23
    On January 27th, 2011 at 12:57 am, Hangfire said:

    Nothing raises the cost of any insurance policy as much as making it mandatory does.

    I remember in the early ’70s when Oklahoma made auto insurance (liability) mandatory. Mine tripled within 4 months, and doubled again within a year.

    Mandatory medical care will be the same, except exponentially higher.

  24. #24
    On January 27th, 2011 at 1:15 am, txvet2 said:

    On January 27th, 2011 at 12:57 am, Hangfire said:

    I remember in the early ’70s when Oklahoma made auto insurance (liability) mandatory. Mine tripled within 4 months, and doubled again within a year.

    Of course. Who do you think was lobbying for mandatory insurance? Same bunch who lobby for seatbelt laws.

  25. #25
    On January 27th, 2011 at 1:32 am, CO2 Producer said:

    Per the HHS webpage with the list:

    Waivers only last for one year and are only available if the plan certifies that a waiver is necessary to prevent either a large increase in premiums or a significant decrease in access to coverage.

    And here I thought that the health care law was supposed to do what the waiver does. Go fig. I blame Obama for insufficiently explaining the law.

    So roughly one out of every 150 Americans are relieved from this health care mandate for at least an extra year. If this keeps up, the number of people getting waivers will be more than the number of uninsured and underinsured people that ObamaCare is supposed to “help.” You’d think they’d get the point already.

    Good luck with getting the waiver, WarEagle. Been thinking about applying for one myself (via the link on the HHS site, in case anyone else was wondering).

    To Ignatius Reilly: I’ve heard of The Barbarian Invasions before, and now that I’ve heard more about it, I’ll probably check it out. It won the Oscar for Best Foreign Picture and got rave reviews when it came out in 2003. Ebert gave it four stars. I wonder how many stars he’d give it now, seeing that he’s gung-ho behind the health care law. Do you think TBI would win the Oscar if it had come out now, Ignatius?

  26. #26
    On January 27th, 2011 at 2:33 am, glockomatic said:

    [Obama] doesn’t even realize how much his words and actions don’t match!

    Actually, he does realize, he just hopes that you don’t.

  27. #27
    On January 27th, 2011 at 6:20 am, Ralph Gizzip said:

    On January 26th, 2011 at 8:44 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    I need a waiver, I gotta join a union quick!

    That’s all part of his plan. The other part is he thinks he’s going to pay for Obamacare with all the money in fines companies are going to have to pay for not offering health insurance. Odumba$$ doesn’t realize if it’s cheaper to pay a fine than it is to subsidize health insurance there’s no way can afford to fund health insurance using that pool of money.

  28. #28
    On January 27th, 2011 at 8:26 am, Cogs said:

    The overt arrogance of this Obama guy is simply frightening. I hope Congress starts hearings soon; these people must be stopped.

  29. #29
    On January 27th, 2011 at 8:29 am, John Deaux said:

    On January 27th, 2011 at 12:26 am, mojojojo said:
    I work for a small, local business with one location and no union attachment.

    I’ve received notice that my health care premium is going up 12% this year. Furthermore, my selected insurance plan is being discontinued in 2012, forcing me into to a plan that currently costs more than four times as much as I pay now. The insurance company has no estimate for the actual cost in 2012.

    But think of all those people with pre-existing conditions and 26 yr old students who now have coverage thanks to you paying more. Doesn’t that make you sleep better at night?

    Enjoy it because they’ll be wanting more shortly, so soon we’ll look at these as the “good old days”.

    /sarc

  30. #30
    On January 27th, 2011 at 8:39 am, babiesgrandma said:

    Saw our lovely hostess this AM on Fox and Friends. Michelle always has such interesting (and valid) facts and figures to tell the American public.

    Our nation is teetering on the brink of disaster, and the Oblame-o is out campaigning already. Moving centrist, but still having his Marxist ideals in mind. Yikes.

  31. #31
    On January 27th, 2011 at 9:13 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    Saw our lovely hostess this AM on Fox and Friends. Michelle always has such interesting (and valid) facts and figures to tell the American public.

    Being on Fox is great, but is largley ‘preaching to the choir’. I’d like to see her get on CNN or MSLSD occasionally. Or, even haggle with the hags on ‘The Spew’. She may draw in some converts when they see a smart, rational Conservative knock down the Left’s arguments with logic and historical precedent.

  32. #32
    On January 27th, 2011 at 9:22 am, tarpon said:

    Why do we need waivers? Isn’t that the real story of this debacle?

  33. #33
    On January 27th, 2011 at 10:17 am, right_on said:

    Instead of issuing all these waivers, why don’t they just tell us who they want to punish?

    It’s rather obvious by now, that their intent was to make it appear that “everyone will have to share the pain,” when in fact, they never intended to have the “favored few” impacted financially.

    It’s like looking at the Russian Duma granting favored status to those who can ante up!

  34. #34
    On January 27th, 2011 at 10:23 am, happyscrapper said:

    On January 27th, 2011 at 8:39 am, babiesgrandma said:
    Saw our lovely hostess this AM on Fox and Friends. Michelle always has such interesting (and valid) facts and figures to tell the American public.

    Our nation is teetering on the brink of disaster, and the Oblame-o is out campaigning already. Moving centrist, but still having his Marxist ideals in mind. Yikes.

    I saw her also, and she was amazing, as always. One thing that bothers me, however…they never allow her enough time!! She needs more time!! Fox & Friends is notorious for cutting their guests short because they are up against a “hard break”. As soon as I hear Kilmeade or Doocey start going, “Uh-huh”, “right”, etc. while the guest is talking, it is a signal that they have to wrap it up. Sometimes, the guest is only on for 30 seconds and they are already being cut. They need to balance their time better. I know they can’t allow the guests to ramble on and on, but there are some, like MM, who are saying such interesting and informative things, that you want to hear more!!

    I do agree that she is preaching to the choir…same as on this blog. But the choir needs to hear her too!

  35. #35
    On January 27th, 2011 at 10:24 am, happyscrapper said:

    On January 27th, 2011 at 9:22 am, tarpon said:
    Why do we need waivers? Isn’t that the real story of this debacle?

    Absolutely!! That is the bottom line. And WHY isn’t anyone asking the regressives that very question?? I don’t hear any good quesitions being asked, even at FOX. Why??

  36. #36
    On January 27th, 2011 at 10:45 am, babiesgrandma said:

    HappyScrapper: I agree with what you are saying, and, yes, MM is preaching to the choir. Sometimes the choirmembers need a refresher course along the way.

    Also, that always irritates me when Steve, Gretchen, and Brian start their “uh, huh” and “yes,” and such to wrap it up. However, they are much more entertaining than anything I would see on NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, etc. I occasionally stop in on the channels, and it is drivel. and sad. and boring.

  37. #37
    On January 27th, 2011 at 10:46 am, thejim said:

    Why? Co-conspirators.

  38. #38
    On January 27th, 2011 at 10:56 am, happyscrapper said:

    On January 27th, 2011 at 10:45 am, babiesgrandma said: …that always irritates me when Steve, Gretchen, and Brian start their “uh, huh” and “yes,” and such to wrap it up. However, they are much more entertaining than anything I would see on NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, etc. I occasionally stop in on the channels, and it is drivel. and sad. and boring.

    I too change channels occasionally, and they are almost impossible to watch without a rise in blood pressure! Pure nonsense, most of them. Hard to believe so many people do not recognize the truth, or, if they do, try to cover it up!

    I wonder if anyone has written to F&F and told them how annoying that is? And I also wonder if they TELL their guests they have a certain length of time to talk? One would assume so. At any rate, they need to find some other way to warn the talker that time is winding down. I would even prefer a one-minute warning buzzer or something!

    MM…if you are reading this, maybe you could tell them that is annoying some of their FANS!!

  39. #39
    On January 27th, 2011 at 11:03 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On January 26th, 2011 at 8:44 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    I need a waiver, I gotta join a union quick!

    Bitter Clingers & Typical White People’s Local 4 is accepting applications now.

  40. #40
    On January 27th, 2011 at 11:06 am, Roland said:

    She may draw in some converts when they see a smart, rational Conservative knock down the Left’s arguments with logic and historical precedent.

    Except that when leftists invite someone like MM on to their propaganda shows it is always for the purpose of a multiple attackers on one ambush.

    “Logic and historical precedent” doesn’t work when they set up the segment to begin with a false narrative. The victim spends her whole time trying to overthrow the false narrative instead of getting to the real argument, and she has to do it while getting shouted down and belittled and shut out.

    If she seems to be making any headway at all, the discussion is diverted to something else (straw man, false issue, whatever) where she is blocked from talking, and then the segment ends.

    The LSM needs to be destroyed, not validated. They are horrible people who have no interest in real dialogue.

  41. #41
    On January 27th, 2011 at 11:08 am, 123upnorth said:

    As per the study on men’s attention spans and attractive reporters dispensing the news, I am proud to say that I am able to watch michelle malkin with my eyes and listen with my ears at the same time. Yes, she is stunnningly beautiful and yes I can understand and process everything she says.

  42. #42
    On January 27th, 2011 at 11:11 am, AlohaGuy said:

    But think of all those people with pre-existing conditions and 26 yr old students “children”

    Children – it’s always for the children…

  43. #43
    On January 27th, 2011 at 11:16 am, WaterBoyz said:

    Who wants to bet that this “waiver” thing was planned behind closed doors long ago?

    The Ds are masters of figuring the future.

    The Rs suck at it.

  44. #44
    On January 27th, 2011 at 11:42 am, Regulus said:

    It’s Animal Farm, yet again: “– but some are more ‘equal’ than others.” Back in the Soviet Union, the Communist Party apparatchik always had things a little easier than the average Ivan.

    Like the old American Express card commercial said: “It pays to be a member.”

    On January 27th, 2011 at 11:16 am,

    WaterBoyz said:

    Who wants to bet that this “waiver” thing was planned behind closed doors long ago?

    The Ds are masters of figuring the future.

    The Rs suck at it.

    Perhaps true; but when you think about it, wouldn’t that be a good thing? Or do we want them both to become equally adept at this sort of thing?

  45. #45
    On January 27th, 2011 at 11:55 am, Virginia Patriot said:

    The LSM needs to be destroyed, not validated. They are horrible people who have no interest in real dialogue.

    Bears repeating, they are nothing more than the propaganda arm of the Communist/Democrat party.

  46. #46
    On January 27th, 2011 at 12:11 pm, Mister P said:

    Simple House Bill would be to make waivers by the President illegal, else just give EVERYONE a waiver.

  47. #47
    On January 27th, 2011 at 12:26 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    And now, focusing like a laser beam to create new jobs, the WH has revealed that it will launch another gun control offensive in the next two weeks.

    Another of those Obama WTF moments.

  48. #48
    On January 27th, 2011 at 12:32 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Owebowmao wants to be firearms salesman of the year again. None too soon, either, prices for ammo were starting to drop.

  49. #49
    On January 27th, 2011 at 1:04 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Over at the Human Events website today, I saw an article with the “WTF” in the title…I had to do a double take until I realized the writer meant something about the future – ha!

  50. #50
    On January 27th, 2011 at 1:04 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Hasn’t Obeyme won the Firearms Salesman of the Year two years running?

  51. #51
    On January 27th, 2011 at 1:14 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Pasadena Phil said:

    And now, focusing like a laser beam to create new jobs, the WH has revealed that it will launch another gun control offensive in the next two weeks.

    Another of those Obama WTF moments.

    Always note what he isn’t saying. What he says is BS to appease the masses, what he is silent about is what’s on the agenda.

  52. #52
    On January 27th, 2011 at 2:13 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Hasn’t Obeyme won the Firearms Salesman of the Year two years running?

    Yep, he’s going for the hat trick. Congress won’t cooperate, so he’s likely to do Executive orders and regulations through ATF to accomplish whatever restrictions he’s seeking.

    Stock up now, while you still can.

  53. #53
    On January 27th, 2011 at 3:15 pm, CJ said:

    We wrote to our Congressman last week asking him to sponsor a bill that would end the waivers. After all, the bill is so good and so necessary (said the Dems just last week), and Americans will just DIE if it’s repealed. And yet, all these greedy corporations are getting waivers and denying poor Americans their right to enjoy the full benefits of Obamacare. I thought Dems were the party of little people but they are granting waivers to evil big businesses. It’s a sacriledge, I tell ya.

  54. #54
    On January 27th, 2011 at 3:29 pm, William said:

    The Emperor has no clothes.

    His minions are zombie-like cult-like, Cult figure worshippers.

  55. #55
    On January 27th, 2011 at 3:50 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On January 27th, 2011 at 1:14 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    It is my theory that Obama has already read the writing on the wall and will not be on the ballot in 2012. I believe that he is now focusing on setting up his post-presidential career as an socialist activist and wants to go out having shot his wad laying the groundwork for advancing his agenda in the future. Think of Carter on global human rights and Gorbachev on global eco-socialism.

  56. #56
    On January 27th, 2011 at 3:52 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Congress won’t cooperate, so he’s likely to do Executive orders and regulations through ATF to accomplish whatever restrictions he’s seeking.

    Speaking of which, something has to be done to circumvent ObaMaos EOs or else he’s going to doom this nation with his EOs and Czar appointments well before we get a new president in 2012….if we even make it to 2012.

  57. #57
    On January 27th, 2011 at 3:53 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Well, a new president in January 2013….still questionable at this point.

  58. #58
    On January 27th, 2011 at 3:55 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    The best thing Obama could do to address Tucson shootings would be to arrest America’s Worst Sheriff for refusing/failing to enforce the law.

    What’s the point of passing more laws to make it harder for kooks like Loughner to get guns when the current laws already provide for? It would just be another law for America’s Worst Sheriff to fail to enforce.

  59. #59
    On January 27th, 2011 at 4:40 pm, ddhinnyc said:

    These Chicago thugs are despicable. And now Obama’s idol is Ronald Regan. And they are doing it wide open in public. And getting away with it.

    GAYRIGHTatTWITTER

  60. #60
    On January 27th, 2011 at 6:33 pm, rambler said:

    The IRS isn’t smart enough to keep all this straight.

  61. #61
    On January 27th, 2011 at 7:41 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    It is my theory that Obama has already read the writing on the wall and will not be on the ballot in 2012.

    I fervently wish this were true, but signs are he’s assembling his re-election team in Chicago. He may even run for re-re-election in 2016.

  62. #62
    On January 28th, 2011 at 8:24 am, MarkD said:

    The House should merely pass a bill that if waivers are granted for any, they must be granted to all. Equal protection under the law.

    Let’s watch the president try to veto that and explain it. A case could be made for impeachment. Granting waivers to political supporters is corruption.

  63. #63
    On January 28th, 2011 at 8:29 am, Virginia Patriot said:

    Running for President when you’re ineligible is treason.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Taxing medical progress to death

February 17, 2012 09:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

96 Comments

Quote of the Day: DWS Decries Those Who Impose Their Values on Others

February 16, 2012 10:30 PM by Doug Powers

175 Comments

‘Scuse me?

Acting White House Budget Director Didn’t Get the Obamacare Memo

February 15, 2012 04:43 PM by Doug Powers

56 Comments

Tax or not a tax?

Obama Chief of Staff: No More Compromise on Contraceptive Mandate

February 12, 2012 04:26 PM by Doug Powers

114 Comments

An offer they can’t refuse

Choosing Life and Beating the Odds

February 11, 2012 11:50 AM by Doug Powers

32 Comments

‘Occupy CPAC’ Protester Paid $60 a Day

February 10, 2012 02:32 PM by Doug Powers

45 Comments

Living wage?

‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’

February 10, 2012 09:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

199 Comments


Categories: Health care,SEIU,Unions

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook