Beyond race: The real “No Labels” movement

President Obama was supposed to be the first post-racial president.
But as you know, the post-racial era was over before it began.
It’s been left to a generation of multiracial students to pick up the torch. And they’re putting the president to shame.
Via the NYTimes:
Many young adults of mixed backgrounds are rejecting the color lines that have defined Americans for generations in favor of a much more fluid sense of identity. Ask Michelle López-Mullins, a 20-year-old junior and the president of the Multiracial and Biracial Student Association, how she marks her race on forms like the census, and she says, “It depends on the day, and it depends on the options.”
They are also using the strength in their growing numbers to affirm roots that were once portrayed as tragic or pitiable.
“I think it’s really important to acknowledge who you are and everything that makes you that,” said Ms. [Laura] Wood, the 19-year-old vice president of the group. “If someone tries to call me black I say, ‘yes — and white.’ People have the right not to acknowledge everything, but don’t do it because society tells you that you can’t.”
…Over dinner with Ms. López-Mullins one night, she wondered: “What if Obama had checked white? There would have been an uproar because he’s the first ‘black president,’ even though he’s mixed. I would like to have a conversation with him about why he did that.”
Absent that opportunity, Ms. Wood took her concerns about what Mr. Obama checked to a meeting of the campus chapter of the N.A.A.C.P. last year. Vicky Key, a past president of the Multiracial and Biracial Student Association, who is Greek and black, joined her. The question for discussion was whether Mr. Obama is the first black president or the first multiracial president.
Ms. Key, a senior, remembered someone answering the question without much discussion: “One-drop rule, he’s black.”
“But we were like, ‘Wait!’ ” she said. “That’s offensive to us. We sat there and tried to advocate, but they said, ‘No, he’s black and that’s it.’ Then someone said, ‘Stop taking away our black president.’ I didn’t understand where they were coming from, and they didn’t understand me.”
Whether Mr. Obama is considered black or multiracial, there is a wider debate among mixed-race people about what the long-term goals of their advocacy should be, both on campus and off.
“I don’t want a color-blind society at all,” Ms. Wood said. “I just want both my races to be acknowledged.”
Ms. López-Mullins countered, “I want mine not to matter.”
And the boxes.
And the color-coded congressional caucuses.
This is the real “No Labels” movement. For the sake of my Filipino-Spanish-Russian-Hungarian all-American children, may it flourish.
***
Flashback: The real leading agent of post-racial hope and change….Ward Connerly.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Subscribe to the Michelle Malkin newsletter
February 22, 2012 12:44 PM by Michelle Malkin
33 CommentsSurprise: UK’s Version of ‘Buffett Rule’ Failing to Bring in Expected Revenue
February 22, 2012 11:05 AM by Doug Powers
47 CommentsThe high priests of eco-destruction
February 22, 2012 07:50 AM by Michelle Malkin
118 CommentsGallup: Unemployment Climbing Back to 9% for February
February 21, 2012 02:56 PM by Doug Powers
70 CommentsOvernight Open Thread: Dems Try to Manufacture New Voting Bloc
February 20, 2012 10:24 PM by Doug Powers
55 CommentsDisability Claims Up As Unemployment Benefits Run Out
February 19, 2012 11:16 PM by Doug Powers
70 CommentsIt Wouldn’t Be Saturday Morning Without Another Friday Night Solyndra Document Dump to Sift Through
February 18, 2012 09:52 AM by Doug Powers
41 Comments
Categories: Politics,Race relations
Sister Toldjah
» Quote of the Day: “There is no male equivalent for abortion”


Redstate
» Obama the Tax Cutter? Think Again
Hot Air
» Poll: Romney on the rise in Arizona?
Redstate
» Daily Links – February 22, 2012
Redstate
» Dahlia Lithwick Hates Medical Research











123up – respectful? hardly. More like sophisticated baiting and condescention with an overblown writing style, if you like that sort of thing. Obviously many here do, as one can see them kiss up every now and then. But it’s entertaining.
You didn’t read my link.
STFU until you do.
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
Furthermore, Jefferson would be head and shoulders above anyone even dreaming about running today.
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
Ah, yes, of course. A hypocritical slaveowner who did not free his slaves, even on his death, is head and shoulders above anyone even dreaming about running today.
I said he was brilliant, but you’re kind of missing the point.
Also, your thinking that leaving it up to the individual states could lead to slavery eventually being peacefully abolished is clearly wrong. Slavery in the South was highly profitable tyranny (which is why even Madison wouldn’t give it up, even though he hated himself for it), and that kind of tyranny does not get overthrown without extreme violence.
I’d say the Confederacy got exactly what it deserved, but, actually, they got off easy. Your idea that it was all okay except the slavery is the “just a little bit” of feces in the ice cream problem.
Democrats are scum. They aren’t scum because they do not understand the Constitution or the importance of limited government. If they were able to indulge their personal tyrannical impulses by supporting limited federal government (as it was through most of the 19th century), then, being scum, they would do so.
Don’t think like a Democrat.