See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On February 1st, 2011 at 1:52 pm, cicerokid said:

   Pump up the volume!

2. #2
   On February 1st, 2011 at 1:52 pm, Cogs said:

   The Progressives were in such a hurry to use their new-found power to jam this health care debacle down our throats (with no input from Republicans) that they forgot to dot the I’s and cross the T’s. Now the entire mess is being vomited back up at them and they don’t like it. Frankly, they have no one to blame but themselves. Power hungry dopes.

3. #3
   On February 1st, 2011 at 1:56 pm, letget said:

   I have been wondering how many d’s will side with the r’s on all this? I might suggest d’s who are up for reelection, give a great big think about what is going on here if you want to keep your job in 2012!
   L

4. #4
   On February 1st, 2011 at 1:58 pm, American Elephant said:

   HOPE! ™

5. #5
   On February 1st, 2011 at 2:00 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

   Word in D.C. is that Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell may introduce the House-passed Obamacare repeal bill as an amendment to an FAA bill on the floor this afternoon.

   While I know that they all do it, I don’t agree with this tactic. Each bill should be able to stand on, and be voted on, it’s own merits.

6. #6
   On February 1st, 2011 at 2:03 pm, Thors_Hammer said:

   AGREE, AGREE, AGREE with Rogue! Do not do the same damned thing that the Dems have been doing for the last two years! Have they learned nothing?

7. #7
   On February 1st, 2011 at 2:03 pm, GladzKravtz said:

   Each bill should be able to stand on, and be voted on, it’s own merits.

   If only Uncle Harry would allow …

8. #8
   On February 1st, 2011 at 2:08 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

   Completely off-topic, but there’s no on-topic post for this, and it’s important enough that people need to know and understand the meaning of Barack Obama’s own words…

   Obama green-lighting Muslim Brotherhood participation in Egyptian government

   Am I surprised?

   Not one bit.

   Barack Hussein Obama Took Shahada.

   He is part of the “Muslim Brotherhood”.

9. #9
   On February 1st, 2011 at 2:11 pm, nail49 said:

   Each bill should be able to stand on, and be voted on, it’s own merits.

   I would like to see “Napoleon’s Corporal” brought into the process. An old, wise way to issue orders in the military — write them out and then hand them to the lowliest enlisted guy (and usually NOT the birghtest bulb in the chandelier) chosen specifically for the job. If the Corporal understands what the intent is, then it passes. If you get a blank stare, rip up the bill and start over!

10. #10
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:12 pm, txvet2 said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:00 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Can’t. Dingy Harry has virtually complete control of what comes to the floor.

11. #11
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:17 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Aetna isn’t commenting on whether ObamaCare played a role in its decision.

    Cowards.

12. #12
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:18 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:12 pm, txvet2 said:
    Can’t. Dingy Harry has virtually complete control of what comes to the floor.

    I suffer from many delusions.

13. #13
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:21 pm, prendad said:

    Remember this:
    A triumphant Nancy Pelosi celebrated the passage of health care reform yesterday in a rousing speech to packed church service, declaring that she’s not afraid of Republican efforts to repeal the bill if they retake Congress in November. Pelosi said that despite current misconceptions, Americans would soon appreciate the bill’s protections.
    Remember this:
    Progressive journalists are hailing President Obama this morning in the wake of the legislation passing, with New Republic scribe and health care aficionado Jonathan Chalit offering that Barack Obama has”sealed his reputation as a president of great historical import.” Calling it a staggering political achievement, Chalit writes that historians will view the bill as a masterfully crafted piece of legislation.
    Remember this:
    A group of about 120 White House staffers gathered on the Truman Balcony at the White House to celebrate the bill’s passage and have a champagne toast when the senior advisor made the remarks. White House speech writer Jon Favreau told the paper, “It was as excited as I’d seen anyone since election night, since inauguration.”
    He also said there was laughter in the air, with Axelrod and White House Press Secretary Gibbs telling jokes to the president, “He was laughing so hard,” Favreau said. “I’d never seen the president laugh that hard.”

    Yes Mr. President, laugh it up buddy. Have another glass of champagne.

14. #14
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:26 pm, eCurmudgeon said:

    While I know that they all do it, I don’t agree with this tactic. Each bill should be able to stand on, and be voted on, it’s own merits.

    Which is why one more item on the Republican To-Do List needs to be serious legislative reform:

    1. One bill, one subject. Any amendments or riders must be a separate bill.

    2. The bill must contain a formal declaration of the Constitutional authorization/justification for the bill to be proposed in the first place. Any invocation of the Commerce Clause will be grounds for an automatic challenge to same…

    3. The bill may not exceed 15 pages of double-spaced type in size.

    No doubt others can suggest additional enhancements and refinements, but this should be good for a start.

15. #15
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:31 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Video: Guess who predicted the ObamaCare ruling?

16. #16
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:38 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Shoot it full of silver bullets, drive a wooden stake in its heart, behead it, incincerate it in a 2000 degree furnace, and then nuke it.

    Make sure it is gone forever.

    Other than that I have no strong opinion.

17. #17
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:39 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:26 pm, eCurmudgeon said:

    Your reform would also eliminate the need for 95% of the lawyers in Washington D.C. SWEET!

18. #18
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:44 pm, txvet2 said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:39 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:26 pm, eCurmudgeon said:

    Your reform would also eliminate the need for 95% of the lawyers in Washington D.C. SWEET!

    Which is why that bunch of lawyers on Capitol Hill would never even consider it.

19. #19
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:46 pm, Mister P said:

    Time to kick Progressivism back to the dark ages where it belongs.

20. #20
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:47 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:44 pm, txvet2 said:

    Hey, I can dream, can’t I?

21. #21
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:54 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:46 pm, Mister P said:

    Time to kick Progressivism back to the dark ages where it belongs.

    Amen to that.

    It may take two more election cycles to get to the point where we control both the Executive branch and 2/3 of each house of the Legislative branch.

    But if we can do that, we can undo 100 years of “Progressivism”.

    Even “Progressive” Court decisions could be overturned via a Constitutional amendment, if necessary.

22. #22
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:54 pm, Lockstein13 said:

    While waiting in a doctor’s office today, the TV showed “The View”…with guest Mitt Romney (gag).

    His “excuse/defense” of Massachusetts’ Romneycare versus Obamacare?: well, according to the Tenth Amendment, states can decide how to do things, but the Federal government can’t impose this.

    Some rationalization. Pffft. Run up the flagpole, who will salute that one?

23. #23
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:55 pm, txvet2 said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:47 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Sure. I like to dream of blondes with large busts, but I also have to live with reality.

24. #24
    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:58 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    OT: Hey Michelle, MSNBC gets duped again!
    Messing with their heads.

25. #25
    On February 1st, 2011 at 3:07 pm, Hangfire said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:21 pm, prendad said:
    Remember this:

    A triumphant Nancy Pelosi celebrated the passage of health care reform yesterday in a rousing speech to packed church service…

    Anybody try splashing a little Holy Water on her?

26. #26
    On February 1st, 2011 at 3:11 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Romneycare running against Obamacare?

    Even The Stupid Party can’t be that stupid…..

27. #27
    On February 1st, 2011 at 3:24 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 3:07 pm, Hangfire said:

    Anybody try splashing a little Holy Water on her?

    Oh ya, that would work.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7GJcKuVGm8

28. #28
    On February 1st, 2011 at 3:49 pm, Hangfire said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 3:24 pm, Flyoverman said:
    Oh ya, that would work.

    That was a bucket of fresh water in TWOO.

    I’m thinkin’ more along the lines of little Megan in “The Exorcist.”

29. #29
    On February 1st, 2011 at 3:50 pm, Hangfire said:

    Or was it Regan?

    I suffer from CRS…..

30. #30
    On February 1st, 2011 at 3:56 pm, bjc said:

    *Keep the pedal to the metal GOP!
    *Overwhelm the Dem rat bastards in DC to kill this legislation once and for all GOP!
    *Take up a vote in the Senate ASAP GOP!
    **Note that the GOP is all we have left at present to follow the will of the people; Do not let us down GOP!

31. #31
    On February 1st, 2011 at 4:01 pm, Hangfire said:

    “Unclean spirit, leave the body of Nancy Pelosi!!”

    {Sprinkle Holy Water}

    “Arrrrrr, it burns!!!”

    “The power of Christ compels you!!!!!”
    “The power of Christ compels you!!!!!”
    “The power of Christ compels you!!!!!”

32. #32
    On February 1st, 2011 at 4:16 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Good luck with that.

33. #33
    On February 1st, 2011 at 4:25 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 4:16 pm, Red State Skeptic said:

    Good luck with that.

    Probably true, but what would work is a complete audit of every USAF charter flight she took. If she is not guilty of misuse of government funds, inappropriate use of military aircraft and lying on a Federal form, I will eat my car.

34. #34
    On February 1st, 2011 at 4:31 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Pelosi needs to be investigated for the fraudulent documents she submitted to put forth an ineligible candidate in 2008.

35. #35
    On February 1st, 2011 at 5:03 pm, Hangfire said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 4:25 pm, Flyoverman said:
    If she is not guilty of misuse of government funds, inappropriate use of military aircraft and lying on a Federal form, I will eat my car.

    What balls!

36. #36
    On February 1st, 2011 at 5:44 pm, T-Bone said:

    Botox injections defraud the people who look at the person. The think they are getting something younger than they are. There should be a law about that, right Nancy?

    Is that express or implied warranty? Or perhaps misdemeanor. The more she misses her injections, de meaner she looks.

37. #37
    On February 1st, 2011 at 6:08 pm, Mister P said:

    Even “Progressive” Court decisions could be overturned via a Constitutional amendment, if necessary.

    When you listen to their rants, you quickly see they are operating in another century. When they defend unions, they bring up child labor laws and 70 hour work weeks. When they defend government regulations they bring up the Robber Barons. Then they drone on an on about the “wealthy” and the need to spread the wealth around. This is of course right out of Marx.

    They are stuck on top/down hierarchical monolithic structures like a large centralized government, never realizing that businesses have abandoned such structures for being inefficient, compartmentalized, unmaintainable and yes a legacy. Business has moved on to distributed/network structures that are flatter and offer far better communication and flexibility. Kind of like united states. In other words the best structure is the structure of federalism.

    Change is too fast for Progressivism and they can only stop progress to get their way.

38. #38
    On February 1st, 2011 at 6:15 pm, 123upnorth said:

    “On a separate front, watch out for a State Obamacare Waiver bill sponsored by Sens. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., and Lindsey Graham, R-SC”

    Screw that sheep-in-wolf’s-clothing, crossdressing, post-op transexual-like Lindsey Graham. He should retire from political life and start his own beauty care line consisting of luscioius lipsticks and sinful shades of eyeshadow.

    Anyone on the right who thinks that Graham has any backbone, conviction or integrity has to get their head examined.

39. #39
    On February 1st, 2011 at 7:18 pm, happy2behere said:

    But where’s the injunction?

40. #40
    On February 1st, 2011 at 8:39 pm, AmericaFirst said:

    Government shutdown is a good thing. Keep attaching the repeal bill to every bill. Harry Reid can say no all he wants.

    What do Lindsey Graham and Pfc. Bradley Manning have in common? Both are flaming homosexual military traitors.

41. #41
    On February 1st, 2011 at 10:30 pm, Republicanvet said:

    On February 1st, 2011 at 2:17 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Aetna isn’t commenting on whether ObamaCare played a role in its decision.

    Cowards.

    Not necessarily. We’ve all seen how Oblahblah’s thugs would go after someone, and how the Republicans roll over and give a blank stare.

42. #42
    On February 2nd, 2011 at 2:34 am, Bruce said:

    The court ruled against the Obama regime, but the Obama regime has been in open defiance of the court, basically saying that the ruling doesn’t apply.

    No one enforced the Federal Court ruling against the regime’s oil drilling ban, and now no one will enforce the Federal Court ruling against Obamacare.

    Oh yes, and no one has enforced the Constitution of the United States where it says that the President must be a natural born citizen.

    Nothing will stop these people because they know that no one will enforce anything against them.

    Why is it that 26 attorneys general can win an important legal battle and yet NONE of them are willing to ask the court to enforce its decision?

43. #43
    On February 2nd, 2011 at 9:04 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    One way to look at the decision…

    Obama backers like unions and corporations had their reasons to get waivers and now Judge Roger Vinson has extended waivers to the rest of us.