See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #101
   On May 15th, 2011 at 5:27 pm, ChapBix said:

   On May 15th, 2011 at 3:35 pm, rambler said:

   The DC elites created the mess, compounded the mess and will have to suffer the consequences of destroying it in the end.

   Isn’t that what the progs have wanted to do all along? Isn’t it part of the Marxist/Alinsky model to destroy what currently exists so it can be replaced with their Marxist solution (which is not really a solution)?

2. #102
   On May 15th, 2011 at 5:41 pm, Mister P said:

   . I won’t go through that colon thing.

   Nor I, and if a doctor insists, I switch doctors. But I am not a good one to give advice. I have refused to ever use sun screen or sun lotion. I believe they are just a result of scare tactics and do more harm than good. Then I found out we are not getting enough vitamin D from the sun, because we block it out. I moved to a place that has well water because I am allergic to chlorine and not want Fluoride. I give dentists a hard time about the mercury in amalgam.

   What it amounts to, is these are our decisions to make, not the governments.

   Ironically I had cancer, and I had to spend months trying to convince doctors that I had a problem. They want early detection as long as its their idea

3. #103
   On May 15th, 2011 at 5:44 pm, Mister P said:

   Isn’t it part of the Marxist/Alinsky model

   The irony is that they were utter failures. They are like the philosophers of irresponsibility.

4. #104
   On May 15th, 2011 at 6:15 pm, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

   Sadly the US government now, nor any time in the foreseeable future is going to actually do anything real or sustainable to stem illegal immigration

   I wish it were not true, but my wishing is not going to change that

   I know that that statement is going to get push back, saying things like, we could, the right politician could, etc

   Well I agree, but with that said, there will not be a sustained effort from either elected party in Washington to do this

   The money being made from both the cheap labor and illegal activity and the so-called fight against that illegal activity is too great

   In Washington that is all that matters

5. #105
   On May 15th, 2011 at 6:33 pm, rambler said:

   ChapBix,

   That maybe what the Alinskyites want. Getting things to collapse into their hands is not a given. Alinsky didn’t write a book on what happens if his plan doesn’t work. His whole plan is based upon lies and deception not honest debate. Individuals with integrity are not Alinsky supporters.

   I look at the flooding of farm land to save NO and Baton Rouge as a parallel for our economy. In an effort to save one, we lose the other without the assurance that the one we are saving won’t flood in the end. The elites have put themselves in a position where no matter what they do, they will lose. No matter what anyone one in DC does, nothing may get fixed. When it collapses, we have to be the phoenix rising.

6. #106
   On May 15th, 2011 at 6:34 pm, Mister P said:

   oldcollegeguy1980, you just made a good case for a third party. If neither political party are going to listen to its citizens, who needs them.

7. #107
   On May 15th, 2011 at 6:43 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

   On May 15th, 2011 at 6:34 pm, Mister P said:
   oldcollegeguy1980, you just made a good case for a third party. If neither political party are going to listen to its citizens, who needs them.

   That’s what it’s going to take, if we want to save our country. I don’t think enough of us do…..

8. #108
   On May 15th, 2011 at 9:11 pm, gmatt2003 said:

   A third party guarantees Obama is re-elected

9. #109
   On May 15th, 2011 at 11:45 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

   Since it’s an open thread, I don’t feel bad about breaking topic:

   My son shot a BBgun for the first time today!!!!!

10. #110
    On May 16th, 2011 at 8:56 am, BOB said:

    I hope he enjoyed it. I hear BB’s as we know them are about to be outlawed and replaced with “nerf” BB”s incapable of injuring even an eyeball when fired at close range.

    Or not. lol

11. #111
    On May 16th, 2011 at 9:20 am, frayed said:

    #88 You mean kinda like BJ Clinton (William Jefferson).

12. #112
    On May 16th, 2011 at 2:27 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

    BOB, He didn’t want to at first, but after a little convincing, he loved it.