The Rebuke in Dubuque: Gingrich’s Rocky Campaign Start Somehow Gets Even Rockier
**Written by Doug Powers
At this pace I’m wondering if that by the end of the week Newt won’t be down in Palm Beach nursing Piña Coladas with Trump and Huckabee.
Newt Gingrich was in Iowa today and is paying the price for his comments on Meet the Press on Sunday. Here’s a transcript from The Blaze of Newt’s encounter with one unhappy customer:
Guy: Speaker Gingrich, what you just did to Paul Ryan is unforgivable.
Gingrich: I didn’t do anything to Paul Ryan!
Guy: Yes, you did. You undercut him and his allies in the house.
Gingrich: No, I…
Guy: You’re an embarrassment to our party.
Gingrich: I’m sorry you feel that way.
Guy: Why don’t you get out before you make a bigger fool of yourself.
The above conversation takes place starting at about 1:30 mark. Also watch for the “hastily thrown together” CYA video the Gingrich camp made after his Meet the Press appearance. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a campaign produce its own hostage tape:
(If the video isn’t working try here)
Newt’s got nowhere to go but up from here, right? Right?
Update: Here’s the short version of Charles Krauthammer’s take on Gingrich: Stick a fork in him, he’s done.
(h/t HAP)
**Written by Doug Powers
Twitter @ThePowersThatBe
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 |
Cincinnati-Area School Pays Kids to… Show Up to School
February 13, 2012 09:43 PM by Doug Powers
40 CommentsNevada Caucuses Open Thread; Update: Romney Wins
February 4, 2012 04:30 PM by Doug Powers
139 Comments
Trump to Make ‘Major Announcement’ in Nevada; May Endorse Gingrich; Update: Romney
February 1, 2012 10:09 PM by Doug Powers
157 Comments
Florida Primary Open Thread; Update: Romney Wins
January 31, 2012 07:24 PM by Doug Powers
163 Comments
Fly Them To the Moon. Please.
January 27, 2012 12:32 AM by Michelle Malkin
114 CommentsGingrich channels open-borders SEIU; Rubio rebukes; Update:Newt retreats
January 25, 2012 10:56 AM by Michelle Malkin
155 Comments
Pelosi Doubles Down: Gingrich Won’t Be Elected — There is Something I Know
January 24, 2012 11:06 PM by Doug Powers
119 Comments
South Carolina Primary Open Thread; Update: Gingrich Wins
January 21, 2012 05:45 PM by Doug Powers
311 Comments
Categories: Newt Gingrich
Sister Toldjah
» Quote of the Day: “There is no male equivalent for abortion”Redstate
» Obama the Tax Cutter? Think AgainHot Air
» Poll: Romney on the rise in Arizona?Redstate
» Daily Links – February 22, 2012Redstate
» Dahlia Lithwick Hates Medical Research
Amen.
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
Flyoverman said:
That’s the tough part about being a Paid Left Shill. Staying In Character. One day Ota is falling all over himself w/ feigned indignation over Rush’s comments regarding Moochelle’s ample backside, then he has ‘kids’ then he’s working in the adult entertainment ‘industry’?
What I’ve typically found is that it’s often multiple individuals w/ a “shared” login. You’ll see posts that pretty much take place 24/7.
In open reg. format they’ll have multiple screen names. The sad part is their supervisors know it, and turn a blind eye. Their non-enforcement becomes construed as ‘approval’. That’s when they get really brazen. By calling the number I’ve provided, we can put a stop to this. At least while they’re on OUR dime.
Obamacare has already been ruled unconstitutional, but no LOTE voter has any business using this to support a position in favor of LOTE voting. The Republicans have their own version of Oblahmacare, which isn’t any more legal or less bureaucratic.
The independence that made America great has already been gone for the better part of a century. Our Republic is living on borrowed time as it is, never mind the borrowed money.
Keep doing what you’ve always done, and you will keep getting what you’ve always got. Conservatives have long voted Republican for the very reasons you’ve cited, with nothing whatsoever to show for it. I don’t need any more evidence. I don’t need four years of John McBama to know they’re all really pursuing the same agenda. I allowed myself to be fooled long enough, and have learned from my mistakes.
I often wonder what it will take for others to learn from theirs and mine.
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
Didn’t say Baier asked qotcha questions, because that is not something he does. Obama has never received a gothca questions. Instead he prefers to hem and haw and say little to nothing for 5 minutes then whines when interrupted.
BING!!!
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
Yesterday, in a conversation, I had this reaction to the old saw that we have to run a Rino, someone who appeals to the “independents”, “center”, whatever.
But, when have we ever run a conservative in the Republican party? Bush Sr and Jr are both RINOS, progressive Republicans. Reagan was conservative, but he was a reformed Democrat. And Reagan almost lost in the primary to Bush Sr because of the Republican elite, the same elite pushing Gingrich, Daniels, Huckleberry, etc.
So, how ’bout we actually TRY a conservative for a change? The last time we tried it, we had 8 great years.
They can’t give me an example of when we tried running an actual conservative and got beat.
Considering that conservative Republicans like me fled the GOP years ago and that GOP registrations have plummeted from about 40% in 2004 to about 28-9% today, what makes the GOP believe that they have to go liberal to attract independents? Where do they think conservatives went? We didn’t like their liberalism when we were Republicans but now that we are independents, we will buy into “even more liberal”?
That is why 2012 might very well be the last national election the GOP qualifies for. That’s what happened to the Whigs.
The voters get the blame for marking the ballot, accepting a less-than-ideal candidate. So, they need to withhold their votes if their party’s candidate is less than ideal? I’m sorry…that’s not courageous, it’s naive.
How about this? Instead of blaming the voters for making a selection off of a dessicated menu, why not purge the officials at the RNC who foist less than ideal candidates upon us?
Hey, maybe I’m all wet, but I think the search for great candidates has to start years before a run is generated. Instead, the RNC runs around courting existing “baggage,” and “albatrosses” that currently populate the Republican Party, believing that you have to go with what (or whom) you know. In so doing, they discount up and coming new faces in the political scene.
Seriously, who wants to go through another decade with the current crop of Republican “potentials,” who’ve seen it all, and done it all. New blood and new ideas for an American renewal? The search for our future doesn’t start at the good ol’ boys club.
#197 On May 17th, 2011 at 2:15 pm, Hiraghm said:
So, you are of the school that says that Barry Goldwater was one of those wishy-washy RHINO frauds that the GOP pushes off on their stupid followers instead of a true conservative that will win?
YES WE CAIN!
I keep thinking of that old video clip of the rocket that lifts a foot or two off the pad, then topples over and explodes in a huge ball of fire.
I don’t know why.
That had everything to do with people voting sympathetically for a dead JFK.
I view that election as an exception.
Battlegound Poll Question D3.
It’s astounding
My money’s fleeing
Madness takes its toll
But listen closely
Not for very much longer
We’ve got to regain control
I remember seeing the RINO Warp
Dreading those elections when
The blackness would hit me
And the void would be calling
Let’s do the RINO Warp again
It’s just a jump to the left
And then a fake to the ri-i-ight
Put yours hands on my hip
And grab my wallet ti-ight!
It’s the progressive thrust
That really drives you insa-a-a-ane
Let’s do the RINO Warp again
Let’s do the RINO Warp again
Palin was ready… the interviewer’s objective was/is to make Palin or any Republican to look like a inept cretin. Which is the liberal media (redundancy alert!)game, I get that, while they never notice or ask a follow up question on anything stupid that Barry says or does.
For example, here is an interview in which the phrase “you know” is used 29 times in a span of 30 minutes.
Keep in mind that Barry was this incoherent in an interview with liberal Steve Kroft, who is clearly in the tank for the man …you know.
http://conservatives4palin.com/2011/05/obama-misuses-the-phrase-you-know-29-times-in-a-thirty-minute-incoherent-and-rambling-interview-with-liberal-steve-kroft.html
Saying “you know” doesn’t make Obama stupid, either. I’m sorry for Palin that she couldn’t answer some simple questions.
She was simply not prepared, and looked foolish. By no means does that make her stupid or dumb. Now, Michelle Bachmann….
Let’s see.
* Defends the use of the word teabagger.
* Feigned outrage over disrespecting women.
* Works in the adult entertainment industry.
Could this guy be any more hypocritical?
So, the prez wasn’t prepared either? Did he ‘look foolish’?
He’s not the best extemporaneous speaker. That’s clear. I wouldn’t say that means he’s not prepared. Being unable to answer a simple question would be unprepared. (Or maybe Palin was coached to be obtuse and not answer easy questions. I have no idea what her handlers told her).
kentroyals5 s
So you’re saying Barry is not stupid, simply unprepared?
I say, I have talked to elementary school children, with better speaking ability. Which supports the theory that the genius was a D or possibly F student.
He only speaks intelligently when reading a prompter.
He’s most incoherent when he has to lie about or deflect away from his true positions on subjects in question. If you get him to speak freely on subjects for which he has a passion, I believe he can communicate quite clearly.
I don’t associate simple mistakes or poor off the cuff answers with stupidity. People will always perform better with more time to prepare. The problem that I see is that the left immediately ridicules and tries to use that as a basis for disqualification.
We’ve had plenty of fun with the 57 states gaffe, but it was a slip of the tongue and everybody sees it as that and opposes him for matters of substance.
By contrast, I had a co-worker who went on about how dumb Sarah Palin was. When asked why she thought that. She said, “Come on. She can see Russia from her house?” If a majority of the electorate makes an informed decision to take this country left, then that’s the will of the people. If they use ridicule and subterfuge to do it, that’s a coup.
Well, this^^ expains alot!
-expains
+explains
Like me dad always told me…”you never have to remember your lies if you tell the truth”. Isn’t there at least one Republican candidate who tells the truth and believes in conservative principles?
We’re screwed!
If you’re not a Republican anymore, then why do you care about how they choose their candidates? Generally speaking for any organization, when you forfeit your membership you also forfeit your right to have any say in how the organization is run, and give up your right to be taken seriously by the remaining members.
Not to put too fine a point on it – You quit. Instead of trying to help fix the organization when it needed help, you turned your back and ran away – yet somehow, incredibly, you still become resentful when the organization doesn’t give you everything you want after you abandoned it.
Your attitude is indistinguishable from the kid who quits the high school football team because the coach won’t take up on his advice for who should be in the starting lineup and what plays to run, but afterward still makes sure to show up for every home game so he can cat-call from the bleachers.
You took the quitter’s easy way out. That strips you of even the patina of intellectual seriousness or moral authority to tell those who haven’t cut and run how they should do things or how they should think.
If you want to go third party, then knock yourself out. You have a lot of work to do and not a lot of time to get your candidates fielded by November of 2012, time that you are wasting in your Ahab-like obsession with harpooning the great GOP whale.
If you choose to come back to the Republican Party to try to make it better instead of just bitching about it because it wasn’t “worthy” of you, that’s another intellectually consistent choice.
Either way. Just remember, when Thomas Paine was writing about “Sunshine Patriots and Summer Soldiers,” it was people like you he must have been thinking about: when you hook it off and run away in the face of the enemy, don’t expect your former comrades still in the firing line to have much sympathy for your desire to either have them run away with you or to make you General.
Now that’s the spirirt — if you’re a Republican and you want a better Republican Party, then work to fix it.
Paid LW shill? Wouldn’t it make more sense for a paid LW shill to come on here, act like a conservative, and say asinine/bigoted things, to make conservatives look bad? Your conspiracy makes no sense, otherwise.
LOL. Define smut peddler. You have no idea what I do in “adult entertainment”. I’ll keep it vague, so that folks who are obsessed with me, and can take the time typing about me, and speculating. I work with a LOT of men, if that helps.
Think long and hard about it, if you must. Personally, I could care less what any of you do; except conservative government workers- we’ll get to that. MM owes me $ for site hits. What does Ota do for a living??? Joke, joke, blah, blah. 
Anyway, I’ve sold 2 screenplays and am working on a new one about “Ota Benga”. If it get’s sold, and made, I guess my identity will be revealed.
I was a police officer for 10 years, but over-work, under-pay, and a bullet through the back of the neck, kind of caused me to seek a new line of work. All in all, I love my life right now.
And no, I don’ think it’s appropriate for a commentator/talking head to make disparaging remarks about the looks of a woman in public life. I think it’s mean-spirited and tacky. You’ll never see me do it; and I’m anonymous. That my opinion. But I’m not the language police, so if a personal insult about the looks of the First Lady gives you a “rush”, have at it. Unlike you, I won’t spend several days or weeks talking about it.
I like your idea about reporting on government employees who blog on the clock. I’ll use the # myself, if I see anyone reveal themselves as a government worker. Great idea.
We can go in circles all day, but despite numerous interviews at Fox News, I haven’t seen Obama, or any liberal, complain about “gotcha” questions, because they don’t like the way their answers turned out. It’s mostly a conservative trick. As far as Obama being held accoutable for his numerous policy flips; that’s a seperate issue from complaining about so-called “gotcha” questions. Clearly, Obama will have a lot of explaining to do when he starts doing interviews and debates for 2012.
There must be. But that person isn’t going to get any lovin’ from the conservative principles strayin’ GOP elites, and if that person got too well known and popular, would most likely be backstabbed and thrown to the wolves in the LSM and the Dems.
If that person managed to survive the backstabbing and the LMS and Dems’ savage onslaught on a groundswell of overwhelming popularity, then, and only then, the GOP would reluctantly ride the coattails of that success.
Wher to find that conservative with the fortitude to endure that.
Showing a little sexism I see.
Ota Benga, if were paid, they would have fired you by now.
Remember when the media was telling us how smart and eloquent Obama was? Biggest con job of all time.
WOW. I’m listening to Hannity on the radio interviewing Governor Chris Christie (NJ). Only caught the last 4 minutes. Chris Christie is against the 2nd Amendment. Chris Christie believes in global warming. He praised the solar panel industry in his state. WTF? Listened to his waffling and wobbling voice when asked specific questions!!! Republicans were pushing for HIM to run for President of the United States?
Exactly. Thanks P. Now, Higrahm, she’s/he’s a candidate as a possible LW shill, paid to infiltrate conservative blogs, to spread bad info, and hurt the cause.
And Redpill, that’s just too obvious. lol
Interesting point. But compared to Booosssh he’s Teddy Roosevelt.
On May 17th, 2011 at 4:53 pm,
Said it here, many times…
Christie is a RINO!
*******************
* Christie’s budget passed only after three conservative Republicans were bullied into voting for it and the savings achieved in the budget were done at the expense of new taxes, new fees, federal Stimulus funds and accounting gimmicks; the 2% property tax cap will actually cause taxes to skyrocket; he has yet to propose the “across the board” tax cuts he promised as a candidate; the budget actually INCREASES state expenditures by 6% and the number of staff in the Governor’s office making $100,000 per year increases by ten.
* His confrontation with the unions is pure Kabuki theater with nothing accomplished but acrimony; he has yet to lay off a single state employee and his proposed 2011 state worker reduction plan is little more than window dressing;
* He has populated his cabinet with notorious liberals while firing the only true conservative – after slandering him;
* He has endorsed notorious RINO candidates in the 2010 mid-term election while avoiding (with one notable exception) contact with conservative candidates;
* He supports a multi-state Cap & Trade scheme known as the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and is so committed to Cap & Trade that he used funds raised from RGGI’s carbon auctions to help balance the budget; he has directed that state funds be appropriated to subsidize “green” technology ventures such as off-shore windmills;
* He has refused to join other state attorneys-general in a joint lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare while accepting federal funds for the implementation of a similar program on a statewide level;
* He is on record saying that he does not believe illegal aliens are here illegally; he has indicated that he supports amnesty for illegals; he generally favors strict gun control and he supports construction of the Ground Zero Mosque even as he condemns those who oppose it.
Christie also endorsed Mike Castle in DE. It’s like I keep saying in these posts, Christie is a liberal Democrat on every single issue. Is this the guy we want to be fighting were he to become Republican president?
Christie is the fourth RINO choice behind Romney, Pawlenty and Daniels.
Of course, the noseholders don’t care. Anyone is better than Obama and we can’t risk running a conservative. The party that stands for nothing and so will not fight for anything.
2 other points, more on topic:
I’ve been hearing that the “concerned citizen” was a conservative plant(astro-turf). Not sure if that’s true.
Secondly, Newt showed a lot of poise. I’m not sure how long I’d let a fella firmly hold on to my hand, while he took the time to insult me to my face. It would have been kind to let go of Newt’s hand, and request a moment of his time, and then go at him.
What? It’s sexist to think that Michelle Bachmann isn’t bright?
OT, irrelevant and oooooh so tedious. Why do you guys keep feeding this troll.
The image seems to fit except when did Newtie even get an inch off the ground. Not a has-been, a never really was. I for one am very pleased he’s imploding 18 months before the election – along with Donald Chump. Next.
Christie is not a conservative. He wants to fix the budget. NJ has a lot more problems than just the budget and the rich leaving.
The problem with getting rid of bho, is that it may take voting for whatever dead squirrel the GOP nominates.
It doesn’t help when you have this kind of crap. Sean Hannity can not be trusted. I will have a hard time continuing to support Michele Bachmann for the same reason. This fraud usurper Barky Obummer has to be exposed.
This: from another blog
Welcome to the game. We criticize The One and are called racists. Same standards apply to y’all.
If you criticze the lady, you are an evil sexist.
I’ve never believed that Newt could overcome his history. His daughter has tried to put the record straight about his first wife, but I don’t think the story has gained traction.
His past political stances notwithstanding, he looks and sounds like he’s just saying what he thinks people want to hear. I agree with those that believe he is toast.
Now let’s look long and hard at Herman Cain and Allen West.
Next.
http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler/2011/05/16/pjtv-herman-cain-goes-mainstream-washington-wakes-up-to-an-outsider-with-passion-and-common-sense/
If you want to be pety and stupid like those that claim racism everytime Obama is criticized, by all means.
The flaw in that logic is that the current disaster started under Bush. Getting rid of Obama doesn’t get rid of the core problem. We have a ONE-PARTY SYSTEM. Vote
3rd2nd party! Stop doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results. It’s not complicated. Try something else.It’s an old, tired, strawman. Folks that opposed Obama, are generally the same folks that oppose the Clintons. The pigment of Obama’s skin, doesn’t make them automatically racist. Nobody has ever been told: “Hey conservative, if you oppose Obama, you’re a racist.” Nor has it been implied. It’s a strawman…worse…a big fat lie.
Accusing conservatives of being racist about Obama is all based on a game, and not about his agenda/policies: Occasionally a shady conservative uses coded language and selective outrage, to appeal to the the “low-lying”, bigoted fruit on their side, and then the MSM, or particularly MSNBC, overreacts, and call’s said conservative a racist. Said conservative then plays all dumb, like “what I say?”.
This is rare. And it’s all just a stupid political game. Generally, the same folks that oppose Obama, are the same folks that would oppose ANY liberal.
Nobody, and I do mean, nobody, from the conservative side, has been called a racist, simply for opposing Obama’s agenda. It’s a bunch of BS. It’s just typical rightwing embracing of victimhood.
Just a petpeeve. Rant over.
You know what? I’m going to swear off feeding nay of our trolls from here on out. I’m also going to try my best to stay out of the noseholder/purist arguments.
Thank you, swede, Trolls are like stray dogs, feed them once and they never go away.
LOL. That’s actually really funny. I’ve been more prolific than normal the past couple of days. And frankly, I should be doing other things. I won’t be back till Friday, at the earliest.
Unless the primaries are completely rigged, we can nominate a conservative if we don’t scatter our votes. Newt and Romney imploding and Huck staying out clarifies things. The NotTheDemocrats are easier to spot, Daniels, Pawlenty, Huntsman. The conservatives left are Palin (who won’t run), Bachmann (who might), and Cain.
Herman Cain represents the Tea Party’s best shot at removing The Usurper and taking over the GOP. The President, as head of the party, will be staffing the RNC. Removing the progressives from the GOP is vital. If that doesn’t happen, then the GOP should be Whigged. Conservatives need representation. 2010 was good start, but major obstacles still remain, particularly at the RNC.
How do you like your Newts: steamed, poached, broiled, baked, stewed or fried?
In response to 239′s endorsement: how about Lt. Colonel Allen West for VP? Would we be deemed racist if we have 2 black men running against a kinda black ‘man’ and a senile cracka?
The troll #238: give me another comeback that your side uses, besides racism. I’ll be waiting, so hurry it up.
Also, the reference to BJ Clinton is interesting. Izzat because he was really the first ‘black’ pres, well black enough to use the ‘N’ word without getting in trouble for it, or is it just another stunning troll perception? Are you willfully ignorant or just a Obamaton moron?
“What makes you think she is a witch?”
“Wull, she turned me into a NEWT!”
“A Newt?”
“……I got better.”
“BURN HER ANYWAY! BURN HER!!”
You can add Huntsman to your imploding candidates, VP.
I think he’s getting campaign tips from Newt.
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/05/17/huntsman-i-believe-in-climate-change-because-90-of-scientists-do/
Actaully, I just wanted you to be on the receiving end of studity. I get it from Progressives all the time.
As I recall you were the one who called Bachman “stupid.” Fits the template. Anyone who does not bow before the Progressives is either evil or stupid.
Bachman may be many things, but stupid is not one of them. “Stupid” is a term one uses when they have no factual, rationale, substative points to make in rebuttal.
Tell you what, since Ota wimped out, have a shot at #138. In your response you can select from, I am:
1) Stupid
2) Racist
3) Bigotted
4) All of the above
Are you serious? What about the Tea Party? The media has been trying to portray them as racist since they formed.
And don’t forget various members of congress who have said similar things about the Tea Party.
and as HotAir is saying maybe Perry.
Personally right now I would be happy with any of the four and want to see primaries start distinquishing them. Rule of thumb, the more name calling by the left makes them even more attractive.
So Oto Bengo, is Rangel right? Should we bring back the draft? Would you go if called?
I still have dreams in which I am drafted yet again. One even had me drafted a third time. But maybe some people need to get drafted.
Then why do you think she isn’t bright. I would say the way she played Matthews on election night was pure genius. But first we heard how stupid Palin was, by those of course who didn’t have a clue, then it became Bachmann, sorry we recognize Alinsky tactics.
Actually the opposite is true. Bush had the intelligence to not look like an idiot by blaming his predecessor for everything. He had a certain emotional intelligence Obama lacks. Obama comes off more like a petulant child use to getting his own way. Bush also had the intelligence to listen to people instead of pretending to be the most intelligent person in the room (much like Al Gore). Intelligent people do more listening than talking.
Then I would say that Bush could talk coherently on a topic without a TOTUS and he could answer questions without continually contradicting himself and without all the hemming and hawing and the You Knows.
I question Obama intelligence just as I questioned John Kerry’s.
I am leery of any candidate who gets the kid glove treatment from the press. Christie is put up on a pedestal for a reason. We need to be careful, same with Daniels. But I think most conservatives have gotten wise to just what a liberal Republican is? Just cutting a budget is not enough. We don’t need a more efficient way to take our freedoms away. I am glad that we are hitting a deficit wall. It is like a governor that prevents the government from getting bigger.
Evil or stupid if I don’t agree? I said Palin is smart in this thread.
However, I cannot believe the idiotic things Bachmann has said over the last couple years. I stand by my opinion.
And it has nothing to do with her being a woman. My goodness. Jump to conclusions much?
It was a stupid thing for Obama to say. I don’t have the context for the entire statement, (like what led to this statement? Did someone ask him a question about the general negativity in the country, etc?)
But I’d imagine someone may have asked him a question and he tried to answer like a psychologist. And he came off bad. No doubt.
Sexist, misogynist, conservophobic, xylophonophobic misanthrob.
And your mouthwash ain’t makin’ it.
Cain/West would be a great ticket, imho.
Beware of Rick Perry, “Gov.Goodhair”. Before elections he talks real tough about the illegal alien inundation and then does nothing, in fact said Texas should not do what AZ is doing, which is enforcement. How likely would he be to enforce the laws as President that he doesn’t want enforced as Gov?
The eminences grises at MSNBC see a serious problem ahead for Barack Obama in 2012. Why, some voters might just judge him on his … performance! Quelle horreur! Howard Fineman tells Chris Matthews on Hardball that Obama made a strategic error when he said that voters could judge him on how well he did his job. That’s an error? Isn’t that what voters are supposed to do with incumbents? No, explain Fineman and Matthews — incumbents are supposed to talk values.
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/05/12/fineman-oba...
I love that this comes out now, right when Fox publishes their expose on how much money George Soros gives to the media.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/revealed-obama-ca...
Yeah, calling Bachmann an idiot (which is 1/10th as bad as most things on here said about people on the left) makes me a sexist, misogynist, etc.
You’re getting as ‘out there’ as Bachmann is. Congratulations.
Oh, also your feet stink and your mama dresses you funny.
258- she definitely used to dress me funny. Damn those elementary school photos
Barry Soetoro can give you tips on scrubbing your past……
260- No more mom jeans please!
On May 17th, 2011 at 8:21 am, AmericaFirst said:
Aw, c’mon! The man apologized already for his wrong-headed ideas about global warming/climate change goofiness. Believe him if you want, but I am going to take a pass on him. I think the virus is still within him.
No.
That’s why it’s so foolish to vote for the clowns.
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
Herman Cain doesn’t represent the Tea Party any more than Barack Obama represents the Right.
That is, unless you believe the Tea Party is something other than a movement emphasizing the Constitution and the Founders’ vision.
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
Just when I think posters here simply MUST have reached the bottom of the delusional conspiracy theory rabbit hole, someone comes along and shows me it goes at least a little bit deeper.
Just like our criticizing Obama has nothing to do with his race.
Sigh. I’ve never said that about anyone here, or anyone in general, that has criticized Obama.
Just because I’m not a conservative, people are rushing to call me a sexist on this site after expressing my dislike for Bachmann. “Let’s get back at those lefties for calling me a racist.” It’s dumb. Get over it and stop trying to project things onto me that don’t even make sense.
Congratulations for being as silly and stupid as those on the fringe left that claim racism when Obama is criticized.
Speechless:
http://thelastword.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/05/17/6663502-newt-gingrich-hit-with-glitter?gt1=43001
Ilovemycommunistusurper,
trolling, trolling, trolling, got to keep on trolling……..
kentroyals5 –
I do not know if you have played the race card or not, as I do not usually read all comments here. I was just trying to make the point that some liberals, including a few on this site, try to smear those who disagree with Obama as racist. Were those who disagreed with Hillary Clinton sexist? Some maybe, but most probably not.
I am tired of people playing any card be it racist, sexist, homophobe, anti-Muslim and so on. Just because I disagree with someone does not mean I dislike that person. My sister-in-law voted for Obama. I question her judgment, but I still love and respect her.
Was this comment necessary? Have I referred to you as stupid or fringe because I disagree with you? No, I have not. You can disagree with others without having to resort to name-calling or other forms of disrespect.
Kentroyal5 – You must have missed all of the coverage of the various Tea Parties across our great nation. When the MSM reported on these events, 80% or more used the term “racists, racist comments, racist signage, etc.” in their comments. Feel free to look it up. I am a Tea Partyer who happens to be married to someone who is darker complected than me and I was called a racist at a Tea Party rally. Please, check your facts…
Facts don’t matter to liberals. If they checked the facts they wouldn’t be liberals.
What facts did I cite that were wrong? I don’t actually recall citing facts. I was talking about myself and how I don’t call people racist for disagreeing with Obama.
And can you cite any facts/studies that coverage was 80% about the racism of the Tea Party? I’ve never pretended that there are idiots on the left that reactively say ‘racist!’ but let’s not pretend I advocate that or that 80% of the coverage was ‘The Tea Party is racist.”
On May 17th, 2011 at 4:30 pm, Ota Benga said:
You have no idea what I do in “adult entertainment”. I’ll keep it vague, so that folks who are obsessed with me, and can take the time typing about me, and speculating. I work with a LOT of men, if that helps.”
Is Ota a “fluffer”?
Who cares?
Adults like to be entertained just like anyone else. I’m sure that whatever Ota is doing is excellent in its appropriate time and place.
I love adult entertainment. I’m not even sure what a “fluffer” is. As long as he is not exploiting children or trafficking slaves or something outlandish like that, I say leave well enough alone. It isn’t anyone’s business.
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
come on down, chap–down here we all float.
No response? I wasn’t wrong on any ‘facts’?