See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #101
   On May 23rd, 2011 at 7:30 am, chapoutier said:

   His method for doing so is a bit different than reporters have used in the past, but it’s absolutely still a bonafide method of reporting.

   The reporters you speak of merely expand the number of people that know about the events.

   You have a very queer definition of “reporter.” One that is, frankly, not worth arguing about. Obla di obla da.

2. #102
   On May 23rd, 2011 at 8:19 am, BOB said:

   Fox reporters, along with the others, are not “reporters” as we used to think of them, and certainly not investigative reporters. Rush has his dittoheads and Barry the Usurper has his. Just dump what he and his handlers want said by the media via one of their lackeys, and the media will “ditto” it with little…..and mostly no, questioning.

   The usurper and his handlers have established tyrannical control over most of the media, all of Congress and the federal courts.

   When conservative media personalities refuse to investigate, or even discuss Barry’s mostly made up past, and won’t touch his apparent ineligibility with a ten-foot pole, the bad guys have won and we are simply going through the motions of “opposing” the regime.

3. #103
   On May 23rd, 2011 at 9:24 am, Cybergeezer said:

   Michael Barone is one “political journalist” I trust.
   He’s mostly factual, with some educated experience thrown in.
   And his “educated experience” is quite comprehensive, covering many Presidential elections and campaigns.
   Outside of Barone, anybody here making comments has about as much credibility as the highest ranked media anchor.

4. #104
   On May 23rd, 2011 at 9:57 am, corkie said:

   On May 23rd, 2011 at 7:30 am, chapoutier said:

   You have a very queer definition of “reporter.” One that is, frankly, not worth arguing about. Obla di obla da.

   Yes, life goes on, and the world changes. Try to keep up, old man.

5. #105
   On May 23rd, 2011 at 10:03 am, cbmi said:

   On May 22nd, 2011 at 7:42 pm, StaceyOfLiberty said:

   On May 22nd, 2011 at 4:23 pm, cbmi said:
   Hi StaceyOfLiberty,
   What did you think of Anderson Cooper saying, “It’s hard to talk when you’re teabagging.” ?

   For heaven’s sake. I hope it was while he was drunk at a party. >:(

   No, no it wasn’t. It was on the air. Go to YouTube, you will find it easily. Type in “Anderson Cooper: It’s hard to talk when you’re teabagging” .

   After you view it, I would love to hear your views. Don’t you think you would have heard about this if someone on Fox had said such a thing? Or, more accurately, don’t you think if someone on Fox had said something so disparaging about a lefty group you would have heard about it?

6. #106
   On May 23rd, 2011 at 10:11 am, StaceyOfLiberty said:

   @cbmi: That quote is gross. And no, I don’t think I would have heard about it coming from a Fox person, because I never hear about those guys either. I don’t watch a lot of TV or follow TV personalities…I had Glenn Beck mixed up with the musician Beck until pretty recently.

   I just saw the one interview with that reporter Nir what’s-his-name on youtube because someone on FB linked to it.

7. #107
   On May 23rd, 2011 at 10:37 am, cbmi said:

   On May 23rd, 2011 at 10:11 am, StaceyOfLiberty said:

   @cbmi: That quote is gross. And no, I don’t think I would have heard about it coming from a Fox person, because I never hear about those guys either. I don’t watch a lot of TV or follow TV personalities…I had Glenn Beck mixed up with the musician Beck until pretty recently.

   I just saw the one interview with that reporter Nir what’s-his-name on youtube because someone on FB linked to it.

   I didn’t mean that you had to have heard it firsthand, just that it would be so overblown had it been a Fox person being disgusting, you couldn’t have avoided it if you had tried.

   I’m not trying to interrogate you, (believe it or not), but did you catch my other question for you on the Colbert thread?

8. #108
   On May 23rd, 2011 at 10:43 am, cheapseat said:

   Just goes to show that after 4 decades of providing democrat BS propaganda, Nobody is trusted more than any news reporter. Thanks Katy and Dan! We now have a blissfully ignorant electorate who knows every misstep on dancing with the stars, and every off note on American Idol, but couldn’t identify the Speaker of the house to sve their life.

9. #109
   On May 23rd, 2011 at 12:04 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

   Barone is good, most of the others are partisan hacks, pushing the communist/socialist/globalist agenda

10. #110
    On May 24th, 2011 at 10:12 am, StaceyOfLiberty said:

    On May 23rd, 2011 at 10:37 am, cbmi said:
    I didn’t mean that you had to have heard it firsthand, just that it would be so overblown had it been a Fox person being disgusting, you couldn’t have avoided it if you had tried.

    Yeah, that might be true. Most of the MSM has a strong liberal bias, no question.

    I’m not trying to interrogate you, (believe it or not), but did you catch my other question for you on the Colbert thread?

    I don’t mind interrogation from you, cause you’re friendly. I missed the other question about Colbert…I’ll go look.

    I will say I don’t expect other liberals to always say things I agree with 100% of the time. I don’t expect conservatives to answer for every ill-advised thing a conservative says, either.

11. #111
    On May 25th, 2011 at 11:15 am, Rufus Levin said:

    Bobby Gibbs didn’t WIN???