Unbiased Headline of the Day; Update: Down the Memory Hole
**Written by Doug Powers
The Unbiased Headline of the Day is posted just above pictures of Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin and Marco Rubio, and comes to us courtesy of the cable net that hosted last night’s Republican debate, CNN:

Because expressing grave concern for raising the debt ceiling above $14.3 trillion is just crazy talk!
Update: Flush! The “updated” version isn’t really any less biased though.
(h/t Tabitha Hale via Twitter)
**Written by Doug Powers
Twitter @ThePowersThatBe
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
CNN anchor astonishment after student in viral photo with Obama won’t say she’s voting for him
April 27, 2012 05:51 PM by Doug Powers
53 CommentsDana Perino: Media Blamed Bush for High Gas Prices But Gives Obama a Pass
February 20, 2012 01:36 PM by Doug Powers
56 CommentsMSNBC Leans Forward to Apologize to Mitt Romney
December 15, 2011 04:33 PM by Doug Powers
43 CommentsMichele Bachmann: By Now, Michelle Obama Would Have Gotten an Apology From NBC; Update: Apology Received
November 23, 2011 02:18 PM by Doug Powers
91 CommentsDid Newt Gingrich Say the Worst Thing Any Presidential Candidate Has Ever Said?
November 21, 2011 01:02 PM by Doug Powers
159 CommentsNina Totenberg: No Evidence of Anything Political About Solyndra
November 19, 2011 04:21 PM by Doug Powers
45 Comments
Categories: Media Bias



Babalu Blog
» U.S. Manned Space Flight in The 21st Century
Villainous Company
» Must Read Post of the Day. Possibly, the Year


Redstate
» Kimberlin’s Associates Caught on Tape?














but I talk that way at home.
***
Maybe we need to cut John King some slack. Possibly he really was an impartial interviewer without any dogs in the hunt. Maybe he wasn’t trying to make the republican candidates look bad or to cut them off.
***
Maybe he just had a really bad giant guacamole, frijoles, and jalapeno burrito dinner washed down with 2 liters of Carta Blanca Beer!
***
Somehow–I’m betting on the first option. That’s how the American Pravda Media stays employed. No burritos or beer needed.
***
John Bibb
***
Sarah Palin or Joe Biden?
Did he think any of those candidates would choose Joe Biden for anything? King was truly lost on that question. His groupthink is showing.
He must have been trying to create some Palin controversy. After all, they probably giggle about Palin all day at CNN and think everyone else does too. They also think Biden is a genius.
Those Ivy league schools are turning out some real morons nowadays. Moron quadrupled if you factor in the tuition rates they pay at those elitist colleges for that bad education and indoctrination. The Harvard Madrassa alone graduates many idiots each year that somehow then become Dem politicians.
Agreed, I fly my flag everyday.
———————
I have arteriosclerosis, it would still be my 1st pick of those two.
Mustard or Grey Poupon?
Shiite or Sunni?
Crack baby or crack whore?
Yankees or Mets?
Missionary or doggie?
Sheen or Kutcher?
CNN or Fox?
sorry to say, if you saw the 1st one on Fox you’ve probably seen all the debates your going to see this campaign then, unless fox has a Presidential debate between OhNobama and the repukian candidate. Then again the Bull$hiter Barry won’t go on Fox.
Has anyone seen how the DNC used the questions CNN had asked last night?
Were there coordinated efforts here?
Love to see these debates including all the presidential debates have a moderate moderator, ain’t gonna happen I’m afraid. I did watch the debate on pjtv, no commercials either.
I think the biggest reason we(conservatives) find ourselves in the position we are in politically speaking is all the LSM are liberal with one moderate fair and balanced(sorta).
As to the debate…
CNN has a history of unethical behavior with respect to Republican Debates. Here’s what they did in 2008:
On June 14th, 2011 at 5:22 pm, GladzKravtz said:
Count on it.
So, if five hundred people showed up, even though they actually expected more, they could say that they only sold 450 tickets and did better than they thought. Brilliant!!
On June 14th, 2011 at 12:33 pm, happyscrapper said:
The mere thought of vomit makes me sick (I had a hard time handling that with the children and pets) but somehow one big pukefest to get rid of the Usurper is beginning to sound cathartic.
Major O…you are one special “modern Negro” and I love you!
Question #1: Since all of the major networks have had experience conducting these debates at one time or another or should have been learning from past debates, why was there no visual cue for the candidates available? It seems that would have been self-evident.
Question #2: With the above stated, did CNN have a subversive motivation for not providing said visual cue?
The CNN debate in June 2011 was best done now when hardly anyone was watching. The candidates got to practice for the real debates coming up. When I did not find the debate on Fox where I thought it was, I watched a rerun of some show on the Hallmark channel instead. The latter proved to be more entertaining.
Let’s just play along for a minute and pretend they were telling the truth.
This Democratic official was expecting 900 people and booked a venue that seats 2.5 times that?
This Democratic official was too stupid to realize the bad optics that would create?
So, they are either stupid, or they are lying.
I vote for “they are lying.”
JRD says:
RedPill do I need to choose only one?
“i can see progressive terror from my house”. Now that`s real ! I`m stealing that…….okay, “appropriating” !