Did You Know...

   

Obama’s Economists: Each Job ‘Saved or Created’ by the Stimulus Cost $278,000 (So Far)

Share
By Doug Powers  •  July 3, 2011 02:02 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

As Jeffrey Anderson at the Weekly Standard pointed out, the White House releasing a fiscal report on the Friday before a long holiday weekend can only mean one thing: There’s not much good news in it for the White House, and, ergo, taxpayers.

Such is the case with the White House Council of Economic Advisors’ seventh quarterly report on the impact of the “stimulus”:

The council reports that, using “mainstream estimates of economic multipliers for the effects of fiscal stimulus” (which it describes as a “natural way to estimate the effects of” the legislation), the “stimulus” has added or saved just under 2.4 million jobs — whether private or public — at a cost (to date) of $666 billion. That’s a cost to taxpayers of $278,000 per job.

In other words, the government could simply have cut a $100,000 check to everyone whose employment was allegedly made possible by the “stimulus,” and taxpayers would have come out $427 billion ahead.

Mind you these are Obama’s own economists, so the report is like an employee’s performance evaluation that was filled out by the employee. The absolute truth is probably much more bleak.

Over ten years, the CBO says the stimulus will raise the federal deficit $830 billion — $43 billion more than originally estimated.

Which brings us to President Obama’s weekly address:

Now, it would be nice if we could keep every tax break, but we can’t afford them. Because if we choose to keep those tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires, or for hedge fund managers and corporate jet owners, or for oil and gas companies pulling in huge profits without our help — then we’ll have to make even deeper cuts somewhere else. We’ve got to say to a student, ‘You don’t get a college scholarship.’ We have to say to a medical researcher, ‘You can’t do that cancer research.’ We might have to tell seniors, ‘You have to pay more for Medicare.’

Or how about we say to the White House, “You don’t get to spend the remaining $164 billion earmarked for a ‘stimulus’ that is clearly a failure.”

To steal a line from a military recruiting campaign years ago, “it’s a great place to start” — but unfortunately the painfully obvious options never seem to be on the table.

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBeremember beingnull

Schatz-Care? Because the ACA’s working GREAT, Senate progs push single-payer proposal

September 12, 2017 10:01 AM by Doug Powers

The Grubering continues

Is there a DACA in the House? The perils of Pen & Phone decrees exposed again

September 5, 2017 10:01 AM by Doug Powers

Another temporary legacy bites the dust

Confirmed: Iran president really misses previous administration

August 15, 2017 08:44 AM by Doug Powers

Uh huh

Obama’s birthday gives uber-objective media a chance to show how much he’s missed

August 4, 2017 08:57 PM by Doug Powers

Like this, but worse

Paul Krugman serves up more proof Nobel Prize needs ‘comedy’ category

August 1, 2017 05:40 PM by Doug Powers

Obama the Honest


Categories: Barack Obama, Health care, New York Times, Paul Krugman