Romney: On Second Thought, Maybe Humans Aren’t the Cause of Climate Change… Mostly
**Written by Doug Powers
Over two months ago, Mitt Romney told a New Hampshire audience, “I believe the world is getting warmer, and I believe that humans have contributed to that.” Al Gore offered praise and polar bears rejoiced.
At some point between that early June day and now, Romney had a scientific or political epiphany that caused him to tweak his position:
He was asked about global warming at a town hall meeting in Lebanon, New Hampshire, and said he believed the world is getting hotter and humans contribute in some way to the change.
“Do I think the world’s getting hotter? Yeah, I don’t know that but I think that it is,” he said. “I don’t know if it’s mostly caused by humans.
“What I’m not willing to do is spend trillions of dollars on something I don’t know the answer to.”
It’s not an official anthropomorphic flip-flop yet because Romney’s still of the opinion that humans are causing the climate to change — it’s just a question of how much (or little). One thing’s for sure: Whether or not at some point Romney flat-out says humans aren’t the cause of climate change — or even declares himself a proud global warming denier — will directly correlate with his standing in the polls. That science is settled.
**Written by Doug Powers
Twitter @ThePowersThatBe
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
A 2012 campaign must-read: The conservative survival guide to Mitt Romney
May 21, 2012 10:23 AM by Michelle Malkin
159 CommentsNew Obama ad: Romney the job destroyer; Update: Team Mitt’s return salvo
May 14, 2012 04:39 PM by Doug Powers
66 CommentsCharles Barkley offers election prediction during NBA telecast
May 7, 2012 03:21 PM by Doug Powers
68 CommentsHillary Clinton convinces China to allow dissident and family to accompany her back to the US join ‘Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves’
May 5, 2012 11:17 AM by Doug Powers
34 CommentsTens of thousands to fly to Rio to discuss how to limit greenhouse gas emissions
May 3, 2012 07:03 PM by Doug Powers
51 CommentsNewt Gingrich: I’m ending my campaign, but seriously, think about the moon colony idea
May 2, 2012 04:39 PM by Doug Powers
78 CommentsRomney sweeps Tuesday primaries; ‘Better America begins tonight’
April 24, 2012 10:34 PM by Doug Powers
109 Comments
Categories: global warming,Mitt Romney



JustOneMinute
» Patterico And The Brett Kimberlin Gang
Babalu Blog
» U.S. Manned Space Flight in The 21st Century
Villainous Company
» Must Read Post of the Day. Possibly, the Year















Rightasrain–you bring up a good point. I am sure there are brilliant potential presidents out there but who in their right mind would WANT to be president if it entailed having every single aspect of your life, (spouse’s and kid’s) out there for all the world to see? (except for some reason Obama’s–his is private)–somehow we need to make it as easy on them as its been for Obama. (maybe not quiiite as easy)
Well, we’re on to pedophelia now so your olfactory sensibilities may be on to something.
I heard that too. And they have renamed pedophiles “minor-attracted adults”. This gets sicker every day. God cannot be pleased. And He will not be mocked! There is a moral disease permeating the world and we must fight against it with everything we have. Evil is strong, but it is also easy to spot.
Has anyone noticed that commercial with the little girl in a scant swim suit in the water, jumping over the waves, etc. Her swim suit is very flimsy and clings to her body. Then she walks away and looks almost naked. She is about 7 or 8 years old. Every time I see that I think of the pedophiles who get off on stuff like that. Why do they put that kind of commercial on the air? Are they that blind? Or am I just a sick-minded old fool? Don’t answer that, please! I really think the commercial is a bad one and it has been running for quite some time now. I can’t even remember what the product is, but I don’t think it has anything to do with little girls jumping over ocean waves.
I agree. It’s just a matter of how we get there with integrity as opposed to wishful thinking.
Meanwhile BOT. Romney can make some great statements but I still have a hard time believing that HE believes them with conviction or is he just blowin’ in the wind.
If it is proven he is not eligible (not just you think it has been proven he is not eligible), then he won’t be on the ballot.
My point is that it is not your job as a voter to decide Supreme Court cases. It is your job to pick people you think will uphold the Constitution.
As to the question of your morality or hypocrisy or whatever it is with regard to your complaints about Obama’s eligibility, if you think the biggest problem with Obama is his eligibility ….. well, again, you are riding Phil’s screwy train.
Reality matters.
There are two sides to every vote:
1) Who you are voting FOR.
2) Who you are voting AGAINST.
If you can’t vote FOR someone who is in the race on election day, your job as a voter is to stop the worst one from damaging the Republic.
If it comes to that on election day, some damage will be done. It is already a fact. Your job is to minimize the damage, not to ride on some moral high horse/unicorn facing backwards shouting “I am not a noseholder! I am a man of principle!”
Nobody cares about your ego or what you think are your principles when you are doing the clearly wrong thing.
ILMC and crotchless panties perhaps?
WOT:
Hmm.
I smell smoke screen.
Or a major backing of a certain RINO?
FIFY
I did say “sorry” for the O/T discussion, I thought it very important that our children mat be facing yet another type of Officially sanctioned assault if we are unaware !
From my nose to my ear by way of my elbow- Romneyscare / Obamascare, Porkulus, $14+T nat`l debt, out of control spending and on and on and on are ALL issues that face us now and our children in the future !
So it was sorta, kinda, in-a-way, just about, nearly, almost a little on topic…..
This organization already exists. It is called Communist Party USA.
Without a doubt!
Or the start of a “Labor Party”.
Richard Trumka for President?
That’s not even funny.
So how long until Mitt, Newt and Nancy will share a couch together?
Don’t worry, SignPainter! I won’t let MM ban you! We are close personal friends, doncha know!
Besides, if she doesn’t ban ILoveTheHamsterInMyColon, she surely won’t ban you for going off topic once in a while. We all do it!!
Also, your post was only about 12 degress of separation from Kevin Bacon. That’s not bad.
Thanks and agreed happyscrapper, it IS evil and it`s easy to spot and we must fight it !
BTW, you were pretty sittin` on the red Victory the other day. Is that hubby ?
Well that could be interesting…Obama would be telling his people to get in the face and argue with Trumka’s people and Trumka would be telling his people to do the same…
Oh, how WRONG I’ve been all these years in thinking that I should take do the right thing when taking the easiest way out would have been well, so much easier! Gosh, if only SOMEONE as smart as you had gotten to me years ago I might be a less-productive member of society & just do whatever I FELT like doing and sucking off the taxpayer teat until I die. I just wish I had known you so that I could have come to you to ask what I should be doing b/c you seem to have ALL the answers!!
And I’m a WOMAN of principle, thank you very much!
happyscrapper #215,
Thanks again; it`s good to know and cultivate friendships with the right people. Besides, I have a healthy fear of skillets !
Did anyone else see the latest in the taxpayer funded Obama family vacation?
Something tells me that Mitt has waffles every day for breakfast.
Yes, back OT – Mitt is done. Next!!
Thanks for the compliment! Especially since I am about 30 years older than the fella on the motorcycle! He is my new son-in-law!
Of course, the picture was kind of a long-shot, so all my wrinkled skin didn’t show up! And the air-brushing didn’t hurt either! (kidding)
On August 25th, 2011 at 4:37 pm, happyscrapper said:
Happy – You did look great on the cycle in the photo the other day!
No hard feelings about the Rubio disagreement today, I hope : ) I was trying to say that I don’t KNOW if Rubio is eligible or not but if he is, and if he gets on the ticket, he is the man! He gets my vote & all my support. I think I wasn’t stating best what I wanted to say which is this: just b/c obambi got away with it doesn’t mean our side should do the same. I guess I could have been more succinct early on….
Oh. Well, that explains it.
rightasrain #224,
We`re in agreement. As I understand it, Marco was born in the US before his parents became “naturalized citizens”, though they had begun the process. I “think” he was 2 ish when his parents completed the process. I`d be fine with giving him a pass on this one, seeing as how all his records are available and verifiable and he and his parents are allegiant to the USA !
Can`t say that about the Usurper-in-Chief !
No worries!! We aren’t on these thread to agree on everything. That would be pretty boring. A good lively debate is the bedrock of our democratic republic. We can disagree on certain things and still be on the same side. We even get heated and annoyed at times with each other. But we all “kiss” and make up in the end. At least MOST of us do!
That’s because it doesn’t apply to the usurper-in-chief. His only allegiences are to himself and his socialist agenda. He is a traitor.
Yes, a good, lively debate is what it’s all about, isn’t it?! I’m glad most of us can agree that we just want a good, strong conservative to hand obambi his a** on a platter come November 2012!!
happy #223,
I saw your pic w/ our lovely host and your daughter; no wrinkles of detriment were in evidence.
Just to remain on topic, Romney would probably require all motorcycles be painted white and riders wear white so, IF it is determined that man is indeed causing climate change or disruption or volcanoes to erupt or ………..
happy #227,
Before I run out to finish mowing (and to avoid the skillet of disagreement) and to pic an important nit; this is a “Constitutional” Republic, IF we can keep it.
Kthnxbye. Whoosh slam !
I’m not going to kiss Phil. Ever. Sorry.
I might buy him a beer though.
and then introduce him to ILMC in his best evening gown.
First, at what point did they swear allegiance? Where’s the proof of this oath or affirmation of fealty?
Second, “allegiance” is adequate because it speaks of allegiance to a king. We don’t have a king.
Third, I don’t subscribe to Blackstone, but to Vattel. Allegiance is adequate for a Blackstone interpretation, but a Blackstone interpretation does not solve the concern the Founding Fathers had; to ensure that the commander in chief not only was loyal to the U.S., but had no possibly conflicting loyalties. A Moslem can swear allegiance and be lying through his teeth. Only the Vattel definition secures the purpose of Article 2 section 1. As such, it must be the definition the Founding Father’s followed, or else they would have worded it differently. They were literate men in a literate age, and knew the difference between “natural” and “native”.
O/T – stocks were down today, but not Bank of America. Just heard that Warren Buffet is investing $5 billion in BoA.
BoA is one of the banks that enabled and encouraged illegal aliens to get loans and mortgages.
I’m sure the robber baron made a sweetheart deal not available to the general public to further increase his wealth and power.
He’s little better than George Soros.
Waaaayyyyy O/T, but this is just to unbelievable:
That would be the Darth Vader suit, I guess. Still hving trouble with the batteries in the light saber I hear.
go away mitt, you rino
Sadly, it is entirely believable. I say we need to leave Afganistan. We can only keep the peace, somewhat, by our continual presence there, forever.
It isn’t worth the ongoing expense or casualties, especially by inflicting our troops with PC rules of engagement and behavior to make it more difficult to maintain morale and do their jobs.
Back to the topic at hand…
Romney’s new theme song!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn4iIXiT6XY
Ho boy! If that isn’t an open invitation for our guys to “let loose”, I don’t know what is! There are some things that can’t be controled and farts are in that category. They need to “accidentally” let them go whenever they are downwind of one of those dirtbag cult-religion pedophile worshiping creeps. Can anyone PROVE that they mean to do it? This is hilarious! The more things that offend our “peaceful” mooslum friends, the better, I say.
Warren Buffet needs to return to marguerittaville and stay there. Oh…not THAT Buffet? Never mind.
Crazy Pete’s Enviro-Friendly Discount Galleria
LOVED IT!
yes, that’s one of the reasons I badmouth BoA every chance I get–well that and they are the worst bank to deal with. Mrcakes & I pulled our $$$ out of it, and told them why. They were very upset with us at our local bank for it. Tough.
Flip flopper Romney reminds me of scary Kerry who was for it before he was against it. We don’t need a presidential candidate who changes direction at the first sign of wind.