(Photoshop via Doug Ross)
The last time I blogged about David Brooks’s bloviations, I opened by asking:
“How much of a tool is New York Times columnist David Brooks?”
Brooks answers the question himself in his latest column:
I’m a sap, a specific kind of sap. I’m an Obama Sap.
When the president said the unemployed couldn’t wait 14 more months for help and we had to do something right away, I believed him. When administration officials called around saying that the possibility of a double-dip recession was horrifyingly real and that it would be irresponsible not to come up with a package that could pass right away, I believed them.
I liked Obama’s payroll tax cut ideas and urged Republicans to play along. But of course I’m a sap. When the president unveiled the second half of his stimulus it became clear that this package has nothing to do with helping people right away or averting a double dip. This is a campaign marker, not a jobs bill.
You’ll recall — I do, anyway — that Brooks admitted last October that President Obama told him a year ago that he knew that the “shovel-ready project” propaganda he employed to pass the first, massive porkulus bill was a steaming load of bullcrap.
Brooks’ New York Times colleague Peter Baker reported the newsworthy admission in a Sunday magazine piece. It’s an admission that received much deserved attention here in the blogosphere this week and that invited much deserved derision from Republican critics of the stimulus boondoggle.
Why didn’t Brooks report Obama’s damning admission sooner? In another serving of steaming bullcrap, he claims it’s because Baker was more skilled at getting Obama to talk on the record. Seems to me the real reason Brooks didn’t report it is because he had his nose so far up his bromance love object’s you-know-what that he didn’t see the scoop dropped right in his lap.
The news that Brooks is an “Obama sap” is news only to the other smarty pants and panting smarties ensconced at the the Fishwrap of Record.
His ridiculous drool stains have been showing for years:
That first encounter is still vivid in Brooks’s mind. “I remember distinctly an image of–we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant,” Brooks says, “and I’m thinking, a) he’s going to be president and b) he’ll be a very good president.” In the fall of 2006, two days after Obama’s The Audacity of Hope hit bookstores, Brooks published a glowing Times column. The headline was “Run, Barack, Run.”
Over to you, T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII!blog comments powered by Disqus
October 31, 2014 08:28 AM by Michelle Malkin
January 23, 2014 01:59 PM by Doug Powers
January 8, 2014 12:31 PM by Doug Powers
January 5, 2014 04:00 PM by Doug Powers
NYT editor responds to accusations Benghazi report published to vindicate Hillary: ‘We have not chosen Mrs. Clinton’
December 31, 2013 10:33 AM by Doug Powers