Did You Know...

   

Dem Senator: North Carolina Bridges Aren’t in Danger of Falling

Share
By Doug Powers  •  September 23, 2011 05:01 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

To say that President Obama’s justifications to sell the “jobs bill” are overstated would be an understatement. Even members of his own party are on standby with belt sanders to smooth down the sharp exaggerations that are troubling their constituencies.

From CNS News:

Reacting to President Barack Obama’s statement last week that there were 153 “structurally deficient” bridges in North Carolina and that the government should not wait “until another bridge falls” to take action, Sen. Kay Hagan (D.-N.C.) insisted there are no bridges in her state in danger of falling.

“No, no there are not any bridges in North Carolina in danger of falling,” Hagan said when CNSNews.com asked her about Obama’s statement about North Carolina’s “structurally deficient” bridges.

As for “structurally deficient,” a term that Obama uses because it reeks of imminent danger, there’s this:

The Federal Highway Administration applies that scary-sounding label to thousands of bridges across the nation. It basically means the bridge needs careful maintenance and repair to stay in service, and eventually it will have to be rehabilitated or replaced – or closed.

“Structurally deficient doesn’t necessarily mean that they are dangerous,” said Tom Crosby, spokesman for the Charlotte-based AAA Carolinas motor club, which lobbies for more money to replace old bridges. “If these bridges were dangerous, they would close them down and immediately begin work on them.”

I like the way the Beaufort Observer phrased the Obama approach:

Obama appears to have undercounted his bridges. And at the same time – employing the deft spin that political speakers use when they spice up a little information to make a big impression – the president may have over-suggested the risk to public safety.

“Over-suggested” is great substitute for those who don’t want to say “scaremongering” or at the very least “fibbing,” but if the condition of bridges was indeed dire and required a $445 billion outlay for public safety, there should be no need to overstate the situation. Even the bridge that President Obama uses as an example to justify his jobs bill didn’t fall because it wasn’t properly maintained, but rather because of a design flaw.

All I know is that there must not be a lot of bridges in Harry Reid’s district, because he’s still in no hurry to introduce the “American Jobs to Keep Bridges from Collapsing Act.”

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

blog comments powered by Disqus
~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's Email List:

Banned from entering the US? Try making some generous campaign contributions

December 17, 2014 08:55 AM by Doug Powers

drebin1

Nothing to see here

Priorities: Obama admin tasks healthcare facilities with focusing more on … climate change

December 16, 2014 10:05 AM by Doug Powers

gorebear

The doctor is: In

Now how about a report about how many Dems already knew about the CIA’s interrogation techniques?

December 14, 2014 11:46 AM by Doug Powers

nanpelosi-1

She was “fully aware.”

If you like your Slurpee, you can keep your Slurpee: Obamacare ads coming to 7-Eleven receipts

December 12, 2014 01:13 PM by Doug Powers

receipt

Resistance is futile


Categories: Barack Obama, Health care, Politics

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook