Undrained Swamp Update: Things You Can’t Believe are Legal Inside the Beltway, Part XXVII

By Doug Powers  •  October 8, 2011 11:41 AM

**Written by Doug Powers

It isn’t difficult to see why so many in Washington can’t or won’t recognize the inherent problem with things like the Solyndra debacle — or crony capitalism in general. So many of them live with it on a daily basis and display a high degree of tolerance within their own ranks for the very things they outlaw for everybody else.

Enter Rep. Rosa DeLauro:

Federal campaign records reveal a self-dealing relationship between a senior Democratic Connecticut congresswoman and her husband’s political consulting firm.

In the last four congressional election cycles, the campaign committee for Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro, Friends of Rosa DeLauro​, transferred $1.2 million to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which in the same period paid $1.9 million to Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research for polling and other services, according to Federal Election Commission​ (FEC) filings. Stanley B. Greenberg, founding partner of GQRR, is DeLauro’s husband of 33 years.

One comment DeLauro surely gets from the public — aside from “love your movies, Mr. Nimoy” — is, “hey, is that even legal?”

Apparently it is:

Kenneth F. Boehm, a campaign finance expert and chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, said DeLauro’s situation is perfectly legal, even though the funds DeLauro donates to help the DCCC may be re-entering her household through her husband’s business.

Boehm said that legality and propriety do not always coincide: Under current FEC regulations a self-dealing candidate can even pay a spouse for campaign services.
[...]
Capital University Law Prof. Bradley A. Smith, who was chairman of the FEC in 2004, said that self-dealing relationships are not necessarily corrupt, punishable by law or even uncommon.

Smith said, “it’s not just a conflict of interest, it just looks bad. It looks like she’s raising money and giving it to herself.”

Yeah, it sure looks that way:

null

DeLauro is of course a big proponent of campaign finance reform — initiatives that often merely lock all the doors and open all the windows. Politicians who do the kinds of things outlined above and then call for campaign finance and government reforms are the source of constant amusement: “I support this CFR law because we shouldn’t have people like me running around here!”

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On October 8th, 2011 at 11:52 am, zorro said:

    “I support this CFR law because we shouldn’t have people like me running around here!”

    Ha! Love it Doug. As it stands now, getting elected to Congress is better than hitting the lottery.

    These critters are the best argument for term limits.

  2. #2
    On October 8th, 2011 at 11:59 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    This is exactly why “anybody but Obama” is not going to fix anything. The problem with our one-party system is that the corruption is deeply rooted in BOTH branches of the Democratic party. “Anybody but Obama” is the latest intellectually corrupt concept that allows the dirty money to determine which one-world-without borders globalist carries the ball next. Fear and hope are no substitute for a real plan. We need to start producing and voting for candidates who are on OUR side. I am just dreading Herman Cain getting stabbed in the back by Palin standing as he gets cut to pieces and then endorsing Romney for the good of the party. (It would also help if Cain made it clear that he is NOT running for vice-president but for president.)

    If we can’t win the presidency next year, let’s at least make sure that we gut out Congress by sending the entrenched incumbents home packing.

  3. #3
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:04 pm, letget said:

    Wonder if bho has something like this going on with all the crooked things he is involved with? Wonder if somehow mo will get involved getting paid to help bho get re-elected? I bet they have thought about it hard to see if they could pull this off!
    L

  4. #4
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:06 pm, GrnHornet said:

    Can you imagine a world where we all just made our own rules like politicians seem to do. An extension of this type of thinking is how Crazy Harry
    Reid just changed the rules in the Senate the other day. What a bazaar country we have become!

  5. #5
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:17 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Check out the link and you will see a picture of this “woman”. Are there ANY dems in Congress who don’t look like they just stepped off a space ship, or are auditioning for a Spielberg movie? They look like aliens and they think like aliens! I always had a feeling that some of this planet was inhabited by space creatures many hundreds of years ago. Regressives are their spawn. There can be no other explanation.

  6. #6
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:20 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Go to that link…scroll down for another picture of this creature. Sorry, I know it isn’t nice, but how do these people get elected? I suspect it is a result of people not having a clue who they are voting for, but just vote straight democrat because mommy and daddy always have.

  7. #7
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:28 pm, letget said:

    Bless her heart, she is not very attractive is she? You would think with all the money she is getting she could have someone do a little something to help out?
    L

  8. #8
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:30 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

    Another case of

    Do as I say, not as I do.

    Lawsand ethics are for you peasants, not for us.

    Hypocrites.

  9. #9
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:32 pm, buzdburd said:

    O/T but may be important.
    Can anyone confirm or deny this about George Soros buying up gun manufacturers?

  10. #10
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:37 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    It looks like she’s raising money and giving it to herself.”

    This kind of exchange is a common consequence of a highly restrictive federal election system, Smith said, citing examples of self-dealing from the campaigns of Sen. Thomas A. Daschle (D.-S.D.), Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D.-Conn.) and Sen. John S. McCain III (R.-Ariz.): “This is what Washington is now.”

    Public Service. Vote them all out.

    My Rep got a sweetheart deal on a condo for her fiance in exchange for greasing the skids for the real estate developer. Even the local Pravda called her out on it – yet she was elected by the union drones who can’t think for themselves.

  11. #11
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:38 pm, letget said:

    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:32 pm, buzdburd said:

    OMG, this IS very serious if true! We have got to get to the bottom of this STAT or we will no longer have the 2nd with spooky dude in control of the guns?
    L

  12. #12
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:40 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:32 pm, buzdburd said:
    O/T but may be important.
    Can anyone confirm or deny this about George Soros buying up gun manufacturers

    Lock and load, folks, lock and load! Now, let me know when he starts buying up iron skillet companies!

  13. #13
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:43 pm, buzdburd said:

    There are still lots of gunshows out there, but the Progs are in this for the long haul!

  14. #14
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:44 pm, buzdburd said:

    Doug-Can you confirm?

  15. #15
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:45 pm, Paratus said:

    Buzburd: Great read and should alarm anyone if it’s true.
    There was a song out a long time ago called ‘Fear is never boring’. I wish we could send alot of fear into the hearts of the folks in DC. They can make up their on rules and ethics as plymouthaaclaim has pointed out.
    Freakin fear they would loose their nice set up would do the trick.

  16. #16
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:47 pm, cheekymonkey said:

    There is a saying in the African country I grew up in,

    “To hold office is better than to hold money.”

    I thought that was the exception in our nation. At least it used to be, back when most politicians were farmers. Now they all come from the cities.

  17. #17
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:48 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:32 pm, buzdburd said:

    Not an existential problem even if true. Most gun manufacturers are not publicly traded and many are not domestic companies. I really doubt Barret, Glock, and others will sell out to this guy. Besides, the US military and police need guns too. Someone has to manufacture them.

    There are so many guns in the country that they can’t take us out. And gun owners are in the majority. It’s a major, lucrative industry. I am sure someone will jump into the void of any lucrative opportunity that arises should Soros or other totalitarian Marxist create them.

  18. #18
    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:58 pm, buzdburd said:

    “Most gun companies are not publicly traded…” Then I guess THIS is not a problem…

  19. #19
    On October 8th, 2011 at 1:00 pm, peteee said:

    when you make the laws, its amazing at what can be made legal to do.

  20. #20
    On October 8th, 2011 at 1:00 pm, Roland said:

    I thought that was the exception in our nation. At least it used to be, back when most politicians were farmers. Now they all come from the cities.

    They are mostly lawyers now, which means they are mostly professional con artists.

    Not that all lawyers are con artists. Just mostly. All of the ones who are also moral relativists are con artists (by definition, as a practical matter) which means every one that’s a Democrat, just for starters.

  21. #21
    On October 8th, 2011 at 1:08 pm, Roland said:

    Not an existential problem even if true.

    He wouldn’t buy them for the guns. He’d buy them for the propaganda value.

    As in, “If the CEO’s at all those gun companies think this new restriction on gun ownership is a good idea, then I guess it must be ….”

  22. #22
    On October 8th, 2011 at 1:10 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:58 pm, buzdburd said:

    He can’t buy them all and even if he does, the employees who actually design and manufacture them could start their own companies and get back in business if Soros’ plan is to buy them and put them out of business.

    Most of the today’s most popular guns are not patent-protected having been first designed in the nineteenth century. The Browning and Colt designs from that age still dominate the market.

    There are no significant barriers to entry to anyone who wants to start manufacturing their own 1911 or Ruger Mini-14 or Bushmaster if Soros eliminates the main economies of scale barrier by taking out the biggest retail manufacturers. It would mainly depend on who jumps in the fastest and with the most money.

    I don’t believe this story. It would be a futile effort by an evil old fool.

  23. #23
    On October 8th, 2011 at 1:19 pm, SignPainterGuy said:

    “evil old fool” just may be a very important descriptor !

  24. #24
    On October 8th, 2011 at 1:19 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Why didn’t we Tea Partiers think of this? Apparently, having a clear message and being peaceful and civilized during our ethnically diversified events is what makes us violent racist extremists.

  25. #25
    On October 8th, 2011 at 1:20 pm, Iowa Guy said:

    letget said:
    Bless her heart, she is not very attractive is she?

    At first, I thought it was cousin Oliver from The Brady Bunch all grown-up.

  26. #26
    On October 8th, 2011 at 1:25 pm, SignPainterGuy said:

    P.Phil #24,

    It speaks volumes to me, the stuff these people take to a demonstration and then the apparently still good stuff they just throw away. No sense of value whatsoever !

  27. #27
    On October 8th, 2011 at 1:30 pm, sbw999 said:

    On October 8th, 2011 at 11:52 am, zorro said:

    As it stands now, getting elected to Congress is better than hitting the lottery.

    Seems so doesnt it? These people get paid about $175,000 a year, enough to live a little above average in expensive, DC. Yet they all seem to leave as multi-millionaires. Public service my ass. Apparently the public gets to service them. Then after they are finally voted out, they get to peddle their influence for millions as lobbyists. You would see these parasites run for the hills if terms were limited to two, and there was a 10 year moratorium on becoming a paid lobbyist after the last year of “service”.

  28. #28
    On October 8th, 2011 at 1:36 pm, zorro said:

    Congress, the ultimate insider trading sbw999

  29. #29
    On October 8th, 2011 at 1:52 pm, greydude said:

    according to details in the linked article, the “millions” in the pictoral graph are really hundreds of thousands (overstated by factor of ten). also the last column should be labeled 2009-2010 instaed of 2000-2010. i’m a nit-picker.

  30. #30
    On October 8th, 2011 at 2:14 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On October 8th, 2011 at 1:19 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    Why didn’t we Tea Partiers think of this? Apparently, having a clear message and being peaceful and civilized during our ethnically diversified events is what makes us violent racist extremists.

    What a perfect example of stinking, disgusting useful IDIOTS! They all make me sick! Throw them all in jail, but first, make them pick up after themselves and that includes scooping the poop! They are a bunch of pigs posing as people. My apologies to pigs everywhere!

  31. #31
    On October 8th, 2011 at 2:32 pm, right_on said:

    Capital University Law Prof. Bradley A. Smith, who was chairman of the FEC in 2004, said that self-dealing relationships are not necessarily corrupt, punishable by law or even uncommon.

    Really? Yeah, let you or me try this, get caught, and have the authorities say, “Oh. Our bad. Nothing to see here, continue as before. We see no reason for you to have to explain yourself, or to even return the money for that matter!”

    So, here’s the question of the day:

    Are ugly people in politics more likely to be corrupt, and walk a fine line, than those who are not esthetically challenged?

    Feel free to make my point for me by compiling your own list of “corruptofuglies.”

    Some on my list are:

    Maxine
    Rosa
    Hillary
    FLOTUS
    Barbara Lee
    Sheila J-Lee
    The broad-bottomed bimbo
    from Florida that “chairs” the National ProDemLibunist Party.

    I know there are more. What say you?

  32. #32
    On October 8th, 2011 at 2:35 pm, letget said:

    Dear helen thomas should be added.
    L

  33. #33
    On October 8th, 2011 at 2:44 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On October 8th, 2011 at 2:32 pm, right_on said:

    You mentioned only women. What about Henry Waxman? Barney Fwank? Harry Weasel Reid? LOTS more!! But Waxman came to mind immediately. He is one ugly dude!

  34. #34
    On October 8th, 2011 at 2:44 pm, SignPainterGuy said:

    This is a striking example for comparison between the left and right. Here we have hundreds of demonstrators leaving piles and piles of trash and sewage. Depending on who you believe, CBS who estimated 30 some thousand, or the DC Transit Authority who estimated around 4 million, the 8-28 event participants left NO trash scattered around and managed to get ALL their sewage in proper receptacles. Park authorities found only one piece of paper, which was well hidden deep in the grass and had obviously been there for weeks.

  35. #35
    On October 8th, 2011 at 3:49 pm, rambler said:

    Marinating in the swamp……of course they can’t recognize the corruption, it’s just business. They, the powerful elites, feel entitled to what their power can grab and their money will buy. They will get into bed with anyone who will stroke their egos, line their pockets or advance their staying power. These people are addicted to themselves. They think they have a mandate to rule because they were elected. None have any idea how to “represent” the voters. Chicago took this to a fine science. The entire political culture has to change. Politics as a career needs to be ended. Expose them; jail them! And send Soros to France to serve his 3 year sentence for insider trading.

    As for the protesters…. where is the EPA? I’m sure there is some eco rule which forbids dumping sewage on public areas. Dog owners have to pick up after their dogs. Send the organizers of OWS the clean up bill or make those who produced the trash clean and sanitize the area.

  36. #36
    On October 8th, 2011 at 3:53 pm, ChapBix said:

    #5. On October 8th, 2011 at 12:17 pm, happyscrapper said:

    There is another explanation but it is one the libtards would protest vehemently against. It would be considered as politically incorrect: They could be inhabited by demons.

  37. #37
    On October 8th, 2011 at 5:46 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Can we get the Brits to burn DC to the ground again?

    Time to start fresh elsewhere, Nebraska, maybe……

  38. #38
    On October 8th, 2011 at 6:56 pm, Roland said:

    Can we get the Brits to burn DC to the ground again?

    Time to start fresh elsewhere, Nebraska, maybe……

    Juneau, Alaska, and I’m dead serious.

    Anchorage was Alaska’s Capitol when it was a territory. Alaskans picked Juneau to be their State Capitol because it is surrounded by mountains and the ocean, so it could never grow into being a Big City.

    It is also thousands of miles from the Northeast. That would be a huge extra bonus as the US Capitol.

    It would be closer to London, Tokyo, Beijing and Moscow, and it would be much closer to the UN building in Oslo or Stockholm (get the UN the hell out of NY), so it wouldn’t be out in the boonies at all … except to those Northeast lawyers and influence peddlers.

    It would also be convenient for the first woman POTUS in 2021.

  39. #39
    On October 8th, 2011 at 7:02 pm, CW4_KGP said:

    On October 8th, 2011 at 12:04 pm,

    letget said: Wonder if bho has something like this going on with all the crooked things he is involved with? Wonder if somehow mo will get involved getting paid to help bho get re-elected? I bet they have thought about it hard to see if they could pull this off!
    L

    Didn’t I see that in Moooshelle’s recent African expedition that Shasha and Malia were on board as “Senior Staff.”

    It’s good to be King.

    KP

  40. #40
    On October 8th, 2011 at 9:36 pm, BK said:

    What are Term limits? :)

  41. #41
    On October 9th, 2011 at 9:27 am, thejim said:

    Purge!

  42. #42
    On October 9th, 2011 at 10:14 am, air to ground said:

    I know that Justice Thomas was accused of a conflict of interest when his wife became very political. He refused to recuse himself from certain cases. One has to walk the edge of a slippery slope when a spouse is in a business that has links to your occupation. Some marriages take advantage of that link.

    It will be interesting to see if Justice Kagan recuses herself from the Obamacare case. If she doesn’t, would that be enough to qualify her for impeachment?

  43. #43
    On October 9th, 2011 at 12:11 pm, Collateral Damage said:

    While there are “bought & paid for” Republicans (and they should be kicked out too), the Jackass (Democrat) Party has long held ALL of the patents, trademarks, and copyrights on corruption. Just look at it people. When the Jackasses had the House, Senate, and White House, they were the most extreme expression of “Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.”

  44. #44
    On October 10th, 2011 at 11:00 am, cheapseat said:

    These are merely examples of why communism/socialism ALWAYS fails. No matter what these (_*_)s say, what they do is work for the betterment of themselves and their immediate family. The cbc members weren’t giving scholarships to deserving black yutes from their district, but to their children and family members. Face it; we are all basically greedy and lazy! If you don’t believe it, ask yourself when was the last time you went to a neighbors house and gave them money just because they were a good neighbor, or raked their yard just because.
    Ronald Reagan destroyed his “evil empire” by spending on our defense, which forced the USSR to bankrupt itself trying to match us. Obama is doing the same to his “evil empire” which happens to be the U.S. as a capitalist nation. His entire family from grandparents to his wife believe the US is bad, because it let’s people win or lose on their own. As all communists, Obiewon believes there are resources to give everyone everything they want. Great theory in the ivy covered classrooms, but you might ask those professors why they never practice what they preach. Every employee at Harvard or Ben and Jerry’s doesn’t make the same amount of income. Why not? aren’t the janitors people just as deserving as the rocket scientists? Just a thought from the cheapseats.

  45. #45
    On October 10th, 2011 at 1:54 pm, steamjetKC135 said:

    That graph is exactly why Dems shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the Treasury…every year after the first one, they paid more to get less (percentage wise speaking, of course). They can’t even be trusted with their own money!

    Just sayin’ is all…

  46. #46
    On October 11th, 2011 at 9:22 am, Mostly Annoyed said:

    I’m all for campeign finance reform, as a constitutional amendment, nt a law congress will just change like they always do when they think no one is looking. Last time they passed a CFR it had a sunset provision, the day after the following elections.

    I really see no reason anyone but registered voters should be allowed to contribute to political campeigns. It undermines the whole political system with bribes and “pay-to-Play” enforced by the party leadership of BOTH PARTIES. Limit political contributions to $20 per person per year and go after the crooked politicians and donory with mandatory fines, jail time and loss of Congressional pensions as well as right to work for any company with a government contract.

    No one in their right mind should expect politicians to pass laws that will reduce their ability to extort millions from corporate America. Even the lobyists want this to change, companies have to donate to keep political appointees in federal agencies from investigating them without any cause. It is killing our country and needs to change NOW.

  47. #47
    On October 11th, 2011 at 10:07 am, CMSGT said:

    I understand that those in both the Congress and Senate have simplified their Motto to “Nothing is illegal unless your are caught”.

  48. #48
    On October 11th, 2011 at 11:42 am, Roland said:

    Limit political contributions to $20 per person per year

    This would even more power to the media. Their ‘news’/propaganda would be harder to rebut. It would give incumbents even more power than they already have to get reelected.

    All campaign finance ‘reform’ is about making it harder for a challenger to beat an incumbent. Other than laws regarding disclosure, there should be no campaign finance ‘reform’ laws.

    And we shouldn’t need a Constitutional Amendment to accomplish that. It’s already right there in the First Amendment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook