See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #201
   On November 3rd, 2011 at 5:55 pm, spaceycakes said:

   and she’s talking trash.

   you almost got it right, but not quite, mosquito…I’m talking about trash.

2. #202
   On November 3rd, 2011 at 5:56 pm, spaceycakes said:

   I waited for you.

   And you didn’t see me, did you? I was right there.

3. #203
   On November 3rd, 2011 at 6:28 pm, swede said:

   Ilovemyirritablebowelsyndrome said:

   Dude – Oh joy! The new anatomically correct Barbie dolls are out! Your old ones are pretty worn out, no?

4. #204
   On November 3rd, 2011 at 6:28 pm, hawkeye54 said:

   On Purchase a relatively useless island somewhere, grant that island the legal status of independent nation, then give them a free one-way ticket.

   That’ll provide a good glimpse into how well they do under Communism.
   I vote for San Clemente Island off the coast of CA. It’s part of LA County (perfect) and is used for target practice by the US Navy.

   I like it! Gets my vote too.

5. #205
   On November 3rd, 2011 at 6:34 pm, swede said:

   Ilovemysnot said:

   Oh yeah, I forgot to appologize. I underestimated you. I didn’t think you were stupid enough to show up on this thread. Clearly you are. So sorry.

6. #206
   On November 3rd, 2011 at 6:36 pm, CateDean said:

   Why don’t they just move to China or North Korea?

   This is what happens when small minds are exposed to the Public School system. No critical thinking just rehearsed Democratic Socialist party talking points.

   Don’t like Banks… don’t keep your money there!

7. #207
   On November 3rd, 2011 at 6:42 pm, hawkeye54 said:

   Why don’t they just move to China or North Korea?

   Because they are already communist paradises. These folks believe it best for all of us to be as enlighted and this nation follow the same glorious path.

   Besides, those nations wouldn’t put up with this bunch’s antics, and would’t be as gentle in handling them.

   Leaches of the World unite!

8. #208
   On November 3rd, 2011 at 6:43 pm, hawkeye54 said:

   Actually I believe it’s “leeches”. Apolgies to all the Leaches out there.

9. #209
   On November 3rd, 2011 at 6:48 pm, tramper said:

   They really are plumbing the depths using children to further their agenda. They should be called child abusers, the same that’s said of parents that drink, smoke or have overweight children.

   I don’t condone the bankers & big corporations, I think they’re greedy and take the public for fools, but they are not solely to blame, that honour goes to governments who allowed and encouraged what has gone on. But I do think that Wall St, should give the protesters & unions what they want, they should shut up shop for a week, close the banks & cash machines. It would be very interesting to see what happens.

10. #210
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 6:54 pm, longhorn734 said:

    Fourth, it’s not “nonsense” to point out the FACT that Barack Hussein Obama Took Shahada.

    Actually, yes, it was nonsense when you brought it up years ago, it’s nonsense when you bring it up every thread, and it’s still nonsense today. Speaking words and an “honest recitation” in public are not the same thing, and you are in no place to judge what makes an “honest recitation”. And citing your own website as a reference doesn’t make it more true.

    (Sorry to other readers for the sidebar comment).

11. #211
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 7:02 pm, T-Bone said:

    You sleep with dogs. You get fleas.

    “Occupation” is not “protesting”.

    Silence by the leaders of our country in the wake of violence and criminality by the OWS crowd is tacit approval.

    Suggestions of solidarity by our President embolden their illegal occupation.

    Strong condemnation is a clear indicator that their illegal assembly and violent actions are not approved by our society.

    Real leaders would provide that kind of leadership. Stand by the rightous and deny wrongdoers.

    Obama recognizes that the Tea Party does not support his agenda. He also realizes that the OWS protesters do support his agenda. They are the foot soldiers in his class war.

    Reality check.

12. #212
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 7:20 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    WOT but Boehner replays the “minimum of $100B of cuts” line in the sand BS from last year’s lame duck Congress continuing resolution negotiations with the WH.

    And so the GOP unilateral surrender (aka “compromise”) begins. Yeah, re-electing THESE Republicans is the solution to Obama.

13. #213
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:15 pm, jackblack said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 7:02 pm, T-Bone said:

    Well said T-Bone. Obama does not have to say he supports them. His silence on the topic speaks volumes. By not condemning them he is condoning them.

14. #214
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:21 pm, ChapBix said:

    #204. On November 3rd, 2011 at 6:28 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Throw in a naval blockade to contain the insanity that escapes the naval shelling and we have a winner.

15. #215
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:23 pm, jackblack said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:13 pm, cabrerski said:I am done with you. From this point on, I will ignore all of your comments and I hope Ms. Malkin will find a way to remove your vile comments from this site.

    I was done with this idiot months ago. I have not read any of his posts, I just skip by them. Unfortunately the other posters here find him amusing, I just find him annoying.

16. #216
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:30 pm, ChapBix said:

    #212. On November 3rd, 2011 at 7:20 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    And so the GOP unilateral surrender (aka “compromise”) begins continues. Yeah, re-electing THESE Republicans is the solution to Obama.

17. #217
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:33 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On November 03, 2011 at 04:27 pm, Ilovemycountry said:
    

    What’s a miscreant?

    that’s the first time I’ve been called that.

    I find that strains credulity, consider miscreant a compliment.

18. #218
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:40 pm, T-Bone said:

    Bigoted racists like ILMC have no real place in any society. There are a scourge on our community and should be strongly resisted at every level.

    They infect those around them and sour the efforts of right thinking people to improve our societal discourse. They spew venom and promote hatred and bring everyone around them down. They don’t improve debate, they poison it. Frankly, we would all be better off not being around it.

19. #219
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:43 pm, ChapBix said:

    #106. On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:53 pm, Paratus said:

    The union rats just hand them their clubs and molotov cocktails and point them in the general direction of where their butt kicking will take place.

20. #220
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:50 pm, jackblack said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:40 pm, T-Bone said:
    Bigoted racists like ILMC have no real place in any society. There are a scourge on our community and should be strongly resisted at every level.

    They infect those around them and sour the efforts of right thinking people to improve our societal discourse. They spew venom and promote hatred and bring everyone around them down. They don’t improve debate, they poison it. Frankly, we would all be better off not being around it.

    Exactly. If you feed the trolls they keep coming back. If you ignore them they will slither away.
    Now in the immortal words of Forest Gump…”thats all I have to say about that”

21. #221
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:50 pm, jackblack said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:40 pm, T-Bone said:
    Bigoted racists like ILMC have no real place in any society. There are a scourge on our community and should be strongly resisted at every level.

    They infect those around them and sour the efforts of right thinking people to improve our societal discourse. They spew venom and promote hatred and bring everyone around them down. They don’t improve debate, they poison it. Frankly, we would all be better off not being around it.

    Exactly. If you feed the trolls they keep coming back. If you ignore them they will slither away.
    Now in the immortal words of Forest Gump…”thats all I have to say about that”

22. #222
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:53 pm, jackblack said:

    damn, I meant it so much I said it twice. Sorry.

23. #223
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 9:00 pm, OK_Loyalist said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 8:53 pm, jackblack said:

    Just to add to your previous two posts ….

    You have no idea how many times I have wrote replies to troll in question, read them a time or two in preview, and deleted them.

24. #224
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 9:19 pm, TigerLady said:

    Obi Dungo said: I’m out.

    I doubt it.

25. #225
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 9:55 pm, Cal City Conservative said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:18 pm, kentroyals5 said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:50 pm, Flyoverman said:

    When these little darling were ramping up, you were screaming “police brutality” from the top of your lungs.

    Umm, I specifically condoned the violent actions by protestors. Did you miss that?
    

    I didn’t!

    So Mr. high and mighty do you know the difference between condoned and condemned? Doesn’t look like it!

    Hung by your own words, I see that you condone what they did not condemned.

    Damned you are an idiot. Speak and remove all doubt.

26. #226
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 9:57 pm, rocketman said:

    ***
    HI I_LOVE_MY_COUNTRY–#108, et. al. Since some of the smarter commentors here have already “dog piled” on your delusional comment on conservatives and the horrible Gabby Gifford shooting in Tucson–let me add one more incoming dog to the pile–me!
    ***
    Most of the other posters have debunked your strange theory that conservatives–and the Patrona–only care when it is a non conservative person killed or injured. Your comments on this are really in left field.
    ***
    Life should be sacred to any normal thinking person. It should be defended and protected against assault by racism, sexism, classism, ethnic hatred, abortion, deprivation, slavery, etc. The only justified reasons for taking someone’s life are (1) as a just punishment for their unjust taking of a life–like murderers and (2) in wartime or self defense situations where it is a kill or be killed situation.
    ***
    I’m an arch conservative and traditional Christian. I prayed for Ms. Gifford’s return to normal health over months–I hope she will be able to make a full recovery someday. And she was shot by an evil crazy nutjob for some twisted thinking. It had nothing to do with conservatives or liberals. It seems to have been real mental illness and failure to stop the killer before he could act.
    ***
    Put down the bong in the basement and start drinking 100 proof reality instead of chugging down the Obama Koolaid.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

27. #227
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 9:57 pm, Cal City Conservative said:

    The response in 225 is directed at kentyroyals5, just to be clear.

28. #228
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 10:12 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 9:57 pm, Cal City Conservative said:

    I could tell.

29. #229
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 10:22 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I just got on here and read some of the comments by OttoBojangles. I just have to add my two cents worth here! That troll is one of the worst we have ever had. He is snarly, nasty, insulting, condescending, and untruthful. I actually thought he had been banned long ago and then, there he is! I just hope that this time, the ban will stick!! OttoBenGay…STFU. Your comments are only good for one thing…to slander and get us off topic. Unfortunately, it worked.

    If this jerk comes back, ignore him…please! He adds nothing to the discussion.

    Now…off to bed. G’night all!

30. #230
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 10:24 pm, T-Bone said:

    Kent is trying to justify his supoprt for their right to protest while not supporting violence to do so. Of course, that flies in the face of their actual name and stated desire, Occupy Wall Street et al.

    To occupy means you take from someone else. It is not even close to being the same as peacefully protesting to support a political belief or to promote a cause. Their original intent was to take from someone else. That is usually done by force. Owners don’t usually give their stuff away.

    Since they said they wanted to occupy and take what the 1% has to give to themselves, they are taking it by force. Eventually, that will turn violent. The setup dicates that but just by looking and listening to the yahoos there, it is pretty evident they would eventually become violent. Either that or give up and give back what they illegally took. They just want to place blame on the people (police) who come to take back what the protestors stole.

    Right out of Alynsky and Coward and Piven which Kent is probably well aware of.

31. #231
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 10:41 pm, Paratus said:

    I just looked at the second to the last picture. Pretty much sums it up.

    “Redistribution or Revolution”

32. #232
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 11:07 pm, conservative hispanic said:

    Paratus #231:

    Beautiful./SARC

33. #233
    On November 4th, 2011 at 1:27 am, corkie said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:47 pm, kentroyals5 said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:42 pm, Flyoverman said:
    No criticizing the conduct of the protestors AFTER they erupt into violence and defending their actions up to that point is dishonest.

    Sorry for not criticizing the protesters for they did something illegal. I should have criticized them a couple years ago. My bad.

    So you wouldn’t criticize someone playing with matches at a gasoline filler station simply because nothing had blown-up yet?

34. #234
    On November 4th, 2011 at 9:04 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 10:22 pm, happyscrapper said:
    That troll is one of the worst we have ever had. He is snarly, nasty, insulting, condescending, and untruthful.

    Dyam you’re ravishing when you’re angry!

35. #235
    On November 4th, 2011 at 9:42 am, stillontheroad said:

    Ruta Bega is a child attempting to grow up and mature, in some mutation of the normal evolutionary path. He/she/it is the child that spits in its mothers face and the mother laughs as she wipes the spittle from her face saying he/she/it is so cute when angry. Ruta Bega has no direction, no ambition and no ethics. He/she/it is the afterbirth of the 60′s generation hippie/communist vermin, that same vermin that now infects Colleges, Universities, School Systems ation Wide and Government Nitself. The self hatred Ruta Bega displays has but one Prescription, self immolation.

36. #236
    On November 4th, 2011 at 2:56 pm, Cybergeezer said:

    These urine soaked vagrants are tired of just mugging one person at a time. They’re out to mug entire cities now.

37. #237
    On November 4th, 2011 at 3:27 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    I like the broken window photo captioned…

    “We’re better than this.”

    No….. you’re not.

38. #238
    On November 4th, 2011 at 3:29 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    And look at all those teamsters marching for communism.

    More proof that school, nor the lack of it, makes you smart or dumb.

    If you’re an idiot, you’re simply an idiot. Educated or not.

39. #239
    On November 4th, 2011 at 9:06 pm, T-Bone said:

    Redistribution? Thats Obama right? These are his peeps.

40. #240
    On November 4th, 2011 at 10:09 pm, zyzzyg said:

    Truly dissapointing.

41. #241
    On November 5th, 2011 at 8:28 am, Roland said:

    Truly dissapointing.

    To be disappointed, one has to have expected better.

    Did you really expect any better from those barbarians? Seriously??

    I’m just surprised they haven’t killed anyone yet. ‘Accidentally,’ you know.