More ugly Occupy Oakland pictures that won’t make MSM front pages

By Michelle Malkin  •  November 3, 2011 02:19 AM

Massive damage at downtown Oakland Wells Fargo Bank:

“Fuck the bank:”


Source: Twitpic


Source: Twitpic


Source: Twitpic


Source: Twitpic


Source: Twitpic

Chase Bank:


Source: Twitpic

“We are better than this.” Not really. Anarchy speaks louder than whitewash words:

Source: Twitpic

Bank of America:

Destruction at Whole Foods. A photographer writes: “So @WholeFoods got what they asked for from #occupyoakland. Sort of. Not really:”


Source: Twitpic

Vandalism, graffiti, and malicious defacement of both public and private property were widespread:


Source: Twitpic


Source: Twitpic


Source: Twitpic

“Fuck the police.” Nope, didn’t see anyone of those signs at Tea Party protests:

Source: Twitpic

From the Port of Oakland blockade scene late tonight…nope, this looks nothing like a Tea Party either:


Source: Twitpic

From reader X, a resident of Oakland who snapped scores of photos from the protest. Yes, they do hate capitalism:

And yes, they do heart communism:

Get the picture yet?

Oakland teacher’s union hacks in the house:


cap http://twitpic.com/7a1htg

Teamsters representing:


Source: Twitpic

Kiddie human shields:

Source: Twitpic

And as I noted in my column yesterday, one of the leaders of the parade of destruction, rapper Boots Riley, is author/”songwriter” of “5 million ways to kill a CEO,” among other hateful ditties:


Source: Twitpic

Just like the Tea Party? Bull.

***

Previous:

Live from Occupy Oakland: Window smashing, vandalism, and more; charter buses to port, Teamsters in the house; port shut down, trucks overrun

Occupy Oakland’s dangerous “strike” follies; Plus: Capitalism-bashing, cop-hating rapper Boots Riley is back; Updated

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Moonbats,Politics

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:35 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:19 pm, rocketman said:
    ***
    Once again the government officials who exist to enforce our laws stand back and let the liberals / socialists / statists / marxists / commies “wild” on without doing their duty to arrest, charge, and convict those who commit crimes or fail to disperse when ordered to do so.

    These have all taken place in locations with friendly liberal local leaders. These locations were specifically targeted. It would be interesting to see the communications between these majors, the DNC, and the White House.

  2. #102
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:39 pm, Southpaw said:

    Just a preview of the cities holding the Democratic and Republican conventions next summer.

    Stocking up on popcorn….

  3. #103
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:40 pm, sonerai32645 said:

    I understand Mens Wharehouse supports this mob. I sent them an e-mail asking why, but never heard from them. I will never buy from them again
    Joe

  4. #104
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:42 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    This ain’t your father’s tea party!

    Hey Ota, happy now? You reap what you sow.

  5. #105
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:45 pm, jrgdds said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:40 pm, sonerai32645 said:

    I understand Mens Wharehouse supports this mob…

    You’re gonna like the way you look protesting income disparity in Oakland; this Men’s Wearhouse store guarantees it.

  6. #106
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:53 pm, Paratus said:

    Just what the unions want, chaos and violence.
    You can bet that the union rats aren’t out in this bs. They’ll let the fools take the a$$ kickin.

  7. #107
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:54 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Just a preview of the cities holding the Democratic and Republican conventions next summer.

    Stocking up on popcorn….

    Hope you’re stocking up on food, water and ammo, ’cause this whole thing may devolve into coasst-to-coast organized anarchy beyond its entertainment value.

  8. #108
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:01 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    OMG!

    This is the worst thing ever!

    What will we do?!

    OMG!

    Oh yeah, and it’s all Obama’s fault!

    OMG!

    You people, so reactionary and so full of it.

    It’s ironic – when Gab Giffords was shot none of you were as alarmed or as upset.

    Must be those conservative Christian values.

  9. #109
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:03 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
  10. #110
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:03 pm, Blackstone said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 11:43 am, kentroyals5 said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:13 pm, Ota Benga said:

    Now for the next question: do either of you have any speculation on what the same tut-tutters who loved to pontificate about the supposed “violent rhetoric” on the right will have to say about this, or about the class-warfare rhetoric that inspired it?

  11. #111
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:11 pm, Major O said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:54 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Just a preview of the cities holding the Democratic and Republican conventions next summer.

    Stocking up on popcorn….

    Hope you’re stocking up on food, water and ammo, ’cause this whole thing may devolve into coasst-to-coast organized anarchy beyond its entertainment value.

    My thoughts exactly.

  12. #112
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:11 pm, rambler said:

    Morons of the world unite!!!! Massive stupidity on parade. Maybe they can be walled off and allowed to kill each other and then we can be rid of them.

  13. #113
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:14 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 11:03 am, BK said:

    And who will enforce this law?

    It’s not just a law, it’s the Constitution… the supreme law of the land.

    And who will enforce it?

    How about we start with “We the People”, calling on the Congress and the Courts to take this treason seriously…

    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

  14. #114
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:14 pm, Mike2011 said:

    Hey “Ilovemycountry”, which country is your country? Mexico?

  15. #115
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:18 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Mike2011,
    I’ve asked “Ilovemycountry” many times before:

    1) What is your country?
    2) What do you love about it?

    But “Ilovemycountry” has yet to answer those two simple questions…

  16. #116
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:19 pm, Socky said:

    Hey “Ilovemycountry”, which country is your country? Mexico?

    My guess is Cuba or Venezuela.

  17. #117
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:31 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:19 pm, Socky said:
    Hey “Ilovemycountry”, which country is your country? Mexico?
    My guess is Cuba or Venezuela.

    I think its country is Africa.

  18. #118
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:33 pm, Ota Benga said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:03 pm, Blackstone said:

    I have no idea what a tut-tutter is, so you’ll have to enlighten me. I will say that I reject the notion of politicians being responsible for the violent actions of others, unless they openly and explictly call for violence.

    I don’t hold conservative US politicians responsible for the violence of rightwing wingnuts, or vice versa, when it comes to leftwing nuts.

    I see the finge here do it. I hear the players on MSNBC and FoxNews do it, but you haven’t and won’t see me do it. Sorry, if that makes it more difficult to box me in. That’s life.

  19. #119
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:35 pm, Ota Benga said:

    1) What is your country?
    2) What do you love about it?

    That’s sooo arrogant and condescending.
    ILMC should respond with what Cheney told Leahy a few years back.

  20. #120
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:37 pm, Truesoldier said:

    in other OWS news:

    Officials with the revamped ACORN office in New York — operating as New York Communities for Change — have fired staff, shredded reams of documents and told workers to blame disgruntled ex-employees for leaking information in an effort to explain away a FoxNews.com report last week on the group’s involvement in Occupy Wall Street protests, according to sources.

  21. #121
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:38 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I can’t help remembering that woman reporter at one of the first Tea Party rallies when she said the group was not appropriate for children and families and she was acting like she feared for her own safety. Remember her? I believe she got fired. But the attitude lingered until just a few weeks ago when the OWS showed what violence really is!

  22. #122
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:43 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    The country is about 50/50 now. At some point in the near future its going to have to be either us or them. I see no “coexistance”. Civility has its place when everyone plays by the rules, but when the enemy threatens your existance, civility goes out the window. An example is Ghadaffi’s execution. All the do gooders want a trial for the executioners and bring the shooters to justice. Where were these people when his regime were killing thousands. Unfortunately there are consequnces and blood letting in a real revolution. The OWSers only have violence left in their bag o tricks. No one will protect you but yourself.

  23. #123
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:44 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Any person bringing their child to a protest should be charged with child endangerment.

    The “childrens brigade” picture above is disgusting.

  24. #124
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:44 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    Could you imagine what would happen to these OSWers back in the 50s?

  25. #125
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:47 pm, Ota Benga said:

    “The “childrens brigade” picture above is disgusting.”

    I completely agree.

  26. #126
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:48 pm, spaceycakes said:

    I looked hard, but didn’t see any folks there in yarmulkas or prayer shawls. Do you think they would’ve been welcome?

  27. #127
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:48 pm, Roland said:

    It’s ironic – when Gab Giffords was shot none of you were as alarmed or as upset.

    It was one nut, you idiot, and everyone condemned the action.

    This rioting is thousands of people supported by your politicians.

  28. #128
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:49 pm, Adkhiker said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:44 pm, Dexter Alarius said:
    Any person bringing their child to a protest should be charged with child endangerment.

    The “childrens brigade” picture above is disgusting.

    I believe that child in the photo you speak of is, “I Love My Country”.

  29. #129
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:50 pm, Roland said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:35 pm, Ota Benga said:

    1) What is your country?
    2) What do you love about it?

    That’s sooo arrogant and condescending.
    ILMC should respond with what Cheney told Leahy a few years back.

    As usual, you are completely full of crap. It is a perfectly reasonable question to ask of someone who says he loves his country on an internet blog.

  30. #130
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:51 pm, FilAmWIguy said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:35 pm, redgypsy said:

    FilAmWIguy (at 10:18 am) et. al. –isn’t there someone here with enough techie knowledge to do just that? and send it out everywhere we can think of? The internet doesn’t charge–I bet such an ad would go viral…

    I can try my hand at it. Anyone got the audio clips?

    Also, the UN is chiming in as well through their subset ILO.

    Guess which side they are on?

    OWS is now the posterchild for the ILO.

  31. #131
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:53 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:19 pm, Socky said:
    Hey “Ilovemycountry”, which country is your country? Mexico?
    My guess is Cuba or Venezuela.

    I think it’s from Ork.

  32. #132
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:53 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Any person bringing their child to a protest should be charged with child endangerment.

    The “childrens brigade” picture above is disgusting.

    The left are quite comfortable exploiting any combination of children, eldery, and the disabled to advance its agenda. Any injuries or deaths that may occur in the exploition are simply considered justified and the victims are forever held in high esteem in being martyrs for the cause.

  33. #133
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:54 pm, letget said:

    Your gonna love this! I don’t know if anyone has posted this before, if so sorry. acorn got their little hind ends in a sling here, funny it is!

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/11/03/acorn-officials-scramble-firing-workers-and-shredding-documents-after-exposed/
    L

  34. #134
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:57 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    I think it’s from Ork.

    Ork? From whence Mork came? Not possible. My guess is the Delta Quadrant and the Borg Collective.

  35. #135
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:01 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:54 pm, letget said:
    Your gonna love this! I don’t know if anyone has posted this before, if so sorry. acorn got their little hind ends in a sling here, funny it is!

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/11/03/acorn-officials-scramble-firing-workers-and-shredding-documents-after-exposed/
    L

    Certainly not surprising! My only question is…are they being funded by the taxpayers?? We need to keep track of these weasles because they are morphing into all kinds of groups, slithering from under all kinds of rocks. If any of them are “outed”, the first thing we must ascertain is who funds them? If it is US, they need to be shut down. This is Obama’s way of having his ACORN and funding it too!

  36. #136
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:03 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:57 pm, hawkeye54 said:
    I think it’s from Ork.
    Ork? From whence Mork came? Not possible. My guess is the Delta Quadrant and the Borg Collective.

    I do not know of these things you speak. All I know is Ork. But your guess is a good as mine! :wink:

  37. #137
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:07 pm, letget said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:01 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I do have a feeling that taxpayers are paying in an around way through other agencies. I also have a feeling that spooky dude soros is also involved.
    L

  38. #138
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:09 pm, RedDog said:

    All of these people appear to be net tax consumers, not tax payers. In other words, as able bodied people, they are parasites.

    Stop molesting productive society. Work more, talk less, fools.

  39. #139
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:11 pm, TGC said:

    They are like all liberals/progressives/communists…they are brave because they know the local governments will show the utmost restraint in dealing with them…it will be a completely different story when they get brave enough to start attacking private citizens and private property such as cars and homes. Lets see how brave they are the first time one of them is shot. Real America won’t tolerate your crap…it will get ugly.

  40. #140
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:16 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    I do not know of these things you speak.

    Ah, not a Star Trek Next Gen fan, I presume, thus being unaware of the Borg. Fictionally far more evil than one could ever expect from a denizen of Ork and who closely resemble our current members of lefist form of ideology and groupthink.

  41. #141
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:18 pm, AmericanGirl30 said:

    On November 03, 2011 at 10:55 AM, happyscrapper said:
    They need to gather all these anti-capitalism nitwits, from all the cities, and GIVE them their own island…somewhere far enough away so they can’t get back here. Just GIVE them the land and tell them to form their own government and deal with it. I am totally serious! They can elect their leaders, form the kind of government and economic system they WANT, and they can figure out how to survive. One can only imagine the mess they would make. But, NOT MY PROBLEM. I just want them gone, AND I want them to learn a lesson!! This should do it.

    I have a feeling it would turn out rather like Lord of the Flies.

  42. #142
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:19 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:50 pm, Roland said:

    Thank you, Roland!

  43. #143
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:20 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:16 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Yeah, I have never gotten into the Star Trek type stuff. The closest I came was Mork from Ork. I did see one of the Harry Potter movies. Does that count as anything?

  44. #144
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:25 pm, kentroyals5 said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:33 pm, Flyoverman said:
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 11:43 am, kentroyals5 said:
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:13 pm, Ota Benga said:
    You supported the OWS. You cheered when the President, DWS, and San Fran Nan embraced it. You ignored the cheering and involvement from the Communists, Nazis. Hezbollah, et. all. You pontificated on the cruelty of the Oakland police.

    Now that this is coming to its logical conclusion you are indignant.

    The day that Bloomberg let the OWS protestors stay overnight, we were on the road to this. Been there, seen that, got the t-shirt.

    Please cite where I’ve supported OWS. I’ve been very critical of their violent/illegal actions. I do not support their unreasonable demands, whatsoever.

    Please stop pulling stuff out of your a**, Flyoverman. You’re wrong, yet again.

  45. #145
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:26 pm, kwrxxx said:

    The reason that main stream media and news outlets do not publish photographs of graffati and vandialized buildings is that it encourages people to do it more. It doesn’t matter if it is gang graffati or political graffati the reputable news organizations will not publish photos, but will in general mention it in a news report.

  46. #146
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:33 pm, kentroyals5 said:

    Flyoverman, I’ll cite my own words. Comment 206

    (At 123upnorth for misuquoting me)

    Of course you cut off the rest of my quote that makes your comment worthless:

    (at that time in the video. Of course, any OWS thugs that were pelting officers is just as guilty and wrong as the cops in this situation.) I’m just speaking specifically of this incident in Oakland.
    If you’re going to quote me, please do so fairly.

    I’m speaking specifically about the police shooting at people assisting a critically wounded man.

    Yes, I agree with everyone here that the protestors that are acting violently are a disgrace. However, this thread started to talk specifically about this event in Oakland. Hence, I’m just talking about this event.

    Yeah. I’m supporting them. I support their right to assemble and protest, but not illegally. To think I support this movement is completely wrong. I wouldn’t expect you to actually support your claim, though.

  47. #147
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:37 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    KWRXX @145: You said, “..the reputable news organizations will not publish photos, but will in general mention it in a news report.”
    Sorry, not true for the Denver Post. Not a mention of graffitti/bad language signs in ANY city in over 8 days of these treasonous occupy protests and, believe me, I check. Know what they do publish and mention?? Police pushing these so-called protestors around. It’s completely biased from liberal editors.

  48. #148
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:38 pm, Roland said:

    To think I support this movement is completely wrong.

    What do you think of Obama’s supporting the movement?

  49. #149
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:38 pm, 1ConcernedMom said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:43 pm, thetoysurgeon said:
    The country is about 50/50 now. At some point in the near future its going to have to be either us or them. I see no “coexistance”. Civility has its place when everyone plays by the rules, but when the enemy threatens your existance, civility goes out the window. An example is Ghadaffi’s execution. All the do gooders want a trial for the executioners and bring the shooters to justice. Where were these people when his regime were killing thousands. Unfortunately there are consequnces and blood letting in a real revolution. The OWSers only have violence left in their bag o tricks. No one will protect you but yourself.

    Those behind this occupation know they cannot live without responsible, hard-workers paying taxes to “provide” for them. If anyone is greedy, it is them. They think they are entitled to everything (free money, tuition, food, whatever) and think they should be able to do whatever it is that makes them happy, and to he!! with the rest of us. People used to be able to live in society and simply agree to disagree. Those behind this want it their way or the highway. We should tolerate them, but they won’t tolerate us.

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:53 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:19 pm, Socky said:
    Hey “Ilovemycountry”, which country is your country? Mexico?
    My guess is Cuba or Venezuela.

    I think it’s from Ork.

    I think it resides where the Great Deceiver does. I really don’t know why any of us try to help the trolls see the light. They prefer to live in the darkness. I am done responding to them. I will continue to pray for them, because God can perform miracles, but I’m done wasting my breath, or I guess it would be keystrokes, on them.

  50. #150
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:42 pm, cheapseat said:

    The great thing about this recession is that by the time the yahoos finish destroying the economy of the U.S. these cretins will be working for $5.00 per hour picking watermelons. The spread between haves and have nots is expanding because the slugs are getting less and less. When Boeing decides to build it’s new plant in Taiwan, these same union communists will cry a blue streak, but a whole hell of a lot more high school educated overpaid americans are going to be unemployed while chinese thieves build airplanes and mine oil. You reap what you sow.

  51. #151
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:45 pm, Ota Benga said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:25 pm, kentroyals5 said:

    That dude is a joke. I quit reading his crappy posts. I mistakenly caught what you quoted, and once again it’s more senseless garbage.

    He won’t cite, because he won’t find a quote supporting his crap. He does what a lot of loons do on this blog: Make up a strawman, and attribute it to a leftest poster. Folks here can’t deal with logic and nuance. They just rant against some imaginary strawman. This cat you cite, is one of the most consistently intellectually dishonest folks on this cite. Shades of common sense used to leak though on occasion, and then he puts together some bogus crap, just to rant for the sake of ranting. But he’s stupid and lazy, so he attributes his strawman to the likes of you and I. My bad, for accidentally reading more of his sh**.

  52. #152
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:45 pm, cbmi said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:01 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    It’s ironic – when Gab Giffords was shot none of you were as alarmed or as upset.
    Must be those conservative Christian values.

    How do you manage to continue to top your own ignorant crap when you are already at the top of the dung heap? I’ve got to hand it to you – you are #1!!!!

    Firstly, we certainly WERE and ARE sickening and disgusted by the shooting of Gabby Giffords.

    Secondly, we certainly WERE and ARE sickened by the false accusations of blame that were slung around by the likes of you.

    Thirdly, are you proud of your constant attacks on Christianity?

    Fourthly, what other faiths do you insult?

    Finally, why don’t you direct your rage toward your obviously negligent and moronic parents, where it belongs?

  53. #153
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:50 pm, spaceycakes said:

    surely these things have a place where they normally sleep, like an apartment or something?

    Well, they don’t usually sleep on the street do they?

  54. #154
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:50 pm, Flyoverman said:

    To think I support this movement is completely wrong. I wouldn’t expect you to actually support your claim, though.

    When these little darling were ramping up, you were screaming “police brutality” from the top of your lungs.

    That sir, is supporting them. You support their actions, you support them.

    When you have seen one of these demonstrations, when they have overrun you, when they have surrounded you, when YOU are their target, then you will understand.

    They have the right to peacefully assemble, when they have a permit, when they adhere to all local ordanances, and when after a reasonable period of time (hours) they have to disburse.

    Anything other than that, the police should move in, give them one only warning and then crush them. Otherwise, you get what you got last night.

  55. #155
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:51 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    I did see one of the Harry Potter movies. Does that count as anything?

    Counts as being mildly interested in somewhat entertaining fantasy fluff, I suppose. :)

  56. #156
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:52 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Folks here can’t deal with logic and nuance.

    LOL, kneel before Zod!

    snootchie bootchie nootchies!

  57. #157
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:52 pm, kentroyals5 said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:38 pm, Roland said:

    What do you think of Obama’s supporting the movement?

    Support seems like a strong word. The only quote (please enlighten me if I’ve missed something clearer) I saw was him stating that their protests are a reflection of a “broad-based frustration about how our financial system works.”

    He may support their message more than I, I dunno.

    I would guess (and my view is probably different from 95% of people on here) that he does not condone violence and chaos in the protests. Just my two cents.

  58. #158
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:55 pm, JHSII said:

    Sorry kwrxxx, but that’s exactly the opposite of the way the MSM does things.

    Remember during Tea Party events, the liberal plants would show up with their racist and anti-Semitic signs and the MSM couldn’t wait to put it on tv and to connect it to the Tea Parties.

    Now, even worse than what they falsely blamed the Tea Party for is going on at the #Occupy events and the MSM has a virtual blackout because it doesn’t fit the narrative.

  59. #159
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:55 pm, Ota Benga said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:19 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:50 pm, Roland said:
    Thank you, Roland!

    Redpill carries on the Birther nonsense, and has tried to convince people that Obama is a dangerous MOSLEM. He’s a nut.

    To see him feign sanity and civil discourse, causes me to state: “Cheney to Leahy”. Got it? Cool.

    Same to you, Roland.

  60. #160
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:56 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Finally, why don’t you direct your rage toward your obviously negligent and moronic parents, where it belongs?

    Sorry, its the task he’s been assigned by the Collective. That is, to continually monitor this site and offer provocative posts, and then report the activities to his superiors and/or the voices in his head.

  61. #161
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:02 pm, Ota Benga said:

    And off topic, but I recall all of the idiots claiming that the Cain allegations are a “smear” and based on raaaaacsisssm. I hope you’re prepared to call either Romney, Perry, Gingrigh, Baughman, or Santorem, a raaaaaciiissst, if it’s revealed that the story “smear”, came from a white conservative candidate.

    You know, be intellectually consistent.

  62. #162
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:03 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Read it and weep kids,

    http://michellemalkin.com/2011/10/26/live-from-new-york-its-progs-gone-wild/comment-page-3/#comments

    Take your pick of Kentroyal5′s hand wringing posts. A samll sample.

    I also rememeber the rage over the poor tennyboppers who got pepper sprayed. They were blocking a sidewalk and did not disburse. They were lucky it was not mace or a bean bag.

    If you want others look them up yourself, because you know where you made them.

  63. #163
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:07 pm, Paratus said:

    A real question.
    Obama got elected. The left got Obamacare. Why did the leftist push with Fast and Furious, making the Tea Party a target for hate? All the other problems they’ve caused for themselves.
    It makes no sense. Little by little the leftist have gotten what they’ve wanted, welfare, food stamps, government housing, EPA, and other leftist prizes.
    Why now the violence?
    Another ten years and we’d be Europe.
    Why the push now?

  64. #164
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:10 pm, Ota Benga said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:52 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Ok, you find a quote. I like how you play in here like a jolly ole “Falstaff”, and it’s all fine.

    Do you have any comment on conservatives just making up stawman sh**, and attributing it to a leftest poster? If no, cool that. I think it’s lazy-minded and ignorant. If you’re gonna rant, just rant. I’d feel like an a$$ ranting about extreme and hyperbolic issues with rightests and stating, “Oh that’s the way Spaceycakes feels”, despite not having a single quote to back it up. But that’s just me.

  65. #165
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:13 pm, cabrerski said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:01 pm, Ilovemycountry said:
    It’s ironic – when Gab Giffords was shot none of you were as alarmed or as upset.

    Normally, this is the point in which I would satirize your blog name and proceed to make fun of you. Not today.

    A few months before the shooting in Tucson, I attended a very small, private wedding. I have known the bride for over twenty years and have been close with her and her parents. I watched her grow and even drove 3 hours to see her graduate from high school.

    At the wedding, there was a energetic young man named Gabe Zimmerman there. He was taking pictures and was very close to the bride and groom. Young Gabe was also Gabrielle Gifford’s Director of Community Outreach, but I did not know that at the time. It was a lovely evening and a joyous occasion.

    Fast forward to January 8th. Nineteen people were shot by a mad man. Six were killed and Gabe was one of those who perished. There was no political reason despite all the hoopla by talking heads. The man was sick and should have been in some type of supervised care.

    My friends were devastated. This incident also occured a block and a half from my sister’s house. We lost many good people that day, including an innocent child. I am thankful that other 13 victims (as well as those who were nearby) escaped death.

    You have crossed the line, you miscreant. You state things in ignorance and deal in the worst stereotyping possible. When I made fun of you, it was directed at you and you alone. You have a tendency of smearing entire groups of people who you do not know.

    I am done with you. From this point on, I will ignore all of your comments and I hope Ms. Malkin will find a way to remove your vile comments from this site.

    If we ever meet in person, it would take every ounce of self-control not to beat you into a bloody pulp.

  66. #166
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:15 pm, mattm said:

    This was the violence the MSM was hoping the Tea Party would cause. They didn’t, hence no MSM coverage.

  67. #167
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:18 pm, kentroyals5 said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:50 pm, Flyoverman said:

    When these little darling were ramping up, you were screaming “police brutality” from the top of your lungs.

    Umm, I specifically condoned the violent actions by protestors. Did you miss that? I actually linked my comment about it. In that ONE instance, I did have a problem with police shooting more devices at people helping a critically injured man. And somehow that means I support the OWS movement? Please. Your case is weak.

  68. #168
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:23 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Why now the violence?

    What else does Obama have left to play. He is out of ideas, he has said everthing that he could possibly say and people have turned him off. They no longer listen.

    Throw in all of the maifestations about breaking the law, failing to inforce the law, croy capitalism at every turn, rapant corruption and the utter failure of every one of his plans and he is SOL.

    All he has left is to incite turmoil and destroy every GOP challenger.

    Target #1 is Herman Cain.

  69. #169
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:23 pm, Yashmak said:

    How poorly versed in history and economics does one have to be to still be advocating for communism in this day and age?!? Seriously.

    Those must be the most naiive folks in the USA.

  70. #170
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:26 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Umm, I specifically condoned the violent actions by protestors.

    No, you said nothing, just like your Marxist President. Wink and nod, wink and nod.

    Silence is implied consent.

  71. #171
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:26 pm, Yashmak said:

    It’s ironic – when Gab Giffords was shot none of you were as alarmed or as upset.

    Liar. Support this statement with evidence, or shut up.

    I clearly recall many here, in spite of ideological differences with Giffords, stating their condolences and condemning the perpetrator in the strongest possible terms.

    If you can prove otherwise, I challenge you to do so. If not, stop lying.

  72. #172
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:31 pm, kentroyals5 said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:26 pm, Flyoverman said:
    Umm, I specifically condoned the violent actions by protestors.
    No, you said nothing, just like your Marxist President. Wink and nod, wink and nod.

    Silence is implied consent.

    Except when I said in comment 206, linked above:

    Yes, I agree with everyone here that the protestors that are acting violently are a disgrace.

    Or in this thread. Comment 84.

    What scum these maggots are that vandalized the city. Morons.

    You are so damn dishonest. It’s remarkable.

  73. #173
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:33 pm, yaymm said:

    This whole movement is doomed to fail in due time. Unfortunatly, it’s also likely to result in a social meltdown that could wreak havoc in our major cities. It seems as those anrchists, communists and others are pushing for it. As usual, many in the the MSM and politicians are either joining or condoning their actions, claiming that they support non-violent demonstrations.

    The spark will come when a police officer, or (eventually) a National Guard member, is threatened with deadly force and shoots someone.The guns that have not been seen yet will come out and things will get bloody on both sides.

    The politicians have allowed it to get to this point, believing they could reason with these people. They have now got to come to grips with the fact that nothing short of violence can result from this mayhem.

    There is no escape and they cannot deal with it. They can only tread water awaiting the tragedy that is in the making.

    If you’ve never been involved in the middle of riots in our cities, you have no idea how grim it can be. I have been, in the 60′s and believe me, it aint pretty.

  74. #174
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:34 pm, drbulb said:

    Why now the violence?
    Another ten years and we’d be Europe.
    Why the push now?

    Because they know that REAL Americans are on to them now, and we are going to kick their prog/socialist/communist a**es so hard that the cockroaches won’t come back out from under the refrigerator for another 100 years…

  75. #175
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:34 pm, max said:

    Kent said:
    Yes, I agree with everyone here that the protestors that are acting violently are a disgrace.

    that tiny sliver of a minority that’s acting poorly, eh Kent? How do you live with yourself? Really, knowing that your edifice is a tissue of lies and misrepresentations?

  76. #176
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:35 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    How poorly versed in history and economics does one have to be to still be advocating for communism in this day and age?!? Seriously.

    We can thank decades of leftist indoctrination in our public institutes of learning, supported by left leaning media and enterainment industries that have romanticized and glorified communism, and continue to do so, and glossed over or ignored the misery, hopelessness, fear and death communist regimes produced.

  77. #177
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:38 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Because they know that REAL Americans are on to them now, and we are going to kick their prog/socialist/communist a**es so hard that the cockroaches won’t come back out from under the refrigerator for another 100 years…

    And, thus, they must act fast and furiously now to accomplish their goals.

  78. #178
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:38 pm, kentroyals5 said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:34 pm, max said:
    Kent said:
    Yes, I agree with everyone here that the protestors that are acting violently are a disgrace.

    that tiny sliver of a minority that’s acting poorly, eh Kent? How do you live with yourself? Really, knowing that your edifice is a tissue of lies and misrepresentations?

    What is wrong with you? I didn’t say ‘tiny sliver of a minority.’ This is your spin on my comment. I didn’t say ‘small number’ or ‘few bad apples’ or anything. I’m distinguishing between the protestors that are acting violently and those who are exercising their right to peacefully demonstrate. Not all OWS are vandalizing property. Sorry, you’re interpretation of my comment is wrong. Those glasses you’re wearing are having quite the affect on what you see. Psst..it’s not reality based.

  79. #179
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:41 pm, max said:

    CantRoyale:
    it’s “effect” not “affect” … and certainly the vast body of your “work” on these posts would imply that you wholeheartedly support these fellow miscreants — the obvious majority of whom — to anyone with eyes to see — are utter morons, freeloaders and indoctinated commie sheep…regardless of what CNN and MSNBC attempt to portray them as…

  80. #180
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:42 pm, Flyoverman said:

    You are so damn dishonest. It’s remarkable.

    No criticizing the conduct of the protestors AFTER they erupt into violence and defending their actions up to that point is dishonest.

    If you did not see this explosion coming, then all I can say is, “Oh wow.”

    ANYONE who supported any of these demonstrations to last beyond four hours has no clue about radicals or human nature. You might as well put out meat, raise the temperature to 100F, introduce bacteria, and then be shocked that the meat spoiled.

    This was as predictable as the tide coming in and out every 6 hours.

  81. #181
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:47 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:55 pm, Ota Benga said:

    Redpill carries on the Birther nonsense, and has tried to convince people that Obama is a dangerous MOSLEM. He’s a nut.

    To see him feign sanity and civil discourse, causes me to state: “Cheney to Leahy”. Got it? Cool.

    First, it’s not “nonsense” to point out the FACT that what Obama “released” to the public was not what Hawaii “released” to him. Hawaii sent a hard copy document, not a multi-layered PDF, to Obama via his attorneys. For some reason, Obama has chosen not to let any members of Congress inspect the hard copy document he received from Hawaii.

    Second, it’s not “nonsense” to point out the FACT that the state of Hawaii did not say “Obama was born in Hawaii” until AFTER the U.S. House of Representatives voted in favor of H.Res.593.

    Third, it’s not “nonsense” to point out the FACT that the U.S. Supreme Court precedent in Minor v. Happersett found Minor to be a “natural born citizen”, explained why she met that definition, and references from 25 later cases back to Minor v. Happersett were SCRUBBED by Justia.

    Fourth, it’s not “nonsense” to point out the FACT that Barack Hussein Obama Took Shahada.

  82. #182
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:47 pm, Ota Benga said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:38 pm, kentroyals5 said:

    Dude, some of these folks are too stupid to engage with. Others are simply trying to manipulate and mind**** you by twisting your words and context. Then they snicker while you defend yourself.

    Here is some unsolicited advice: They aren’t worth the time or trouble on this thread.

    Have a good day.

    I’m out.

  83. #183
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:47 pm, kentroyals5 said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:42 pm, Flyoverman said:

    No criticizing the conduct of the protestors AFTER they erupt into violence and defending their actions up to that point is dishonest.

    Sorry for not criticizing the protesters for they did something illegal. I should have criticized them a couple years ago. My bad.

    You’re no longer worth my attention. Moving on..

  84. #184
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:47 pm, SHoward said:

    Okay, ILMC may not be Doug Powers’ alter ego after all. Even for the purpose of generating some spicy conversation, no sane-minded individual would carry on that way.

    ILMC seems to have a simple problem: he hates all things related to God. Why? the existence of a supreme being that will one day judge us in some way makes him feel guilty. His mind can’t even let it go and ignore God. He must make it a point to trash those that follow God. He is not content to simply live his life free and unencumbered by what others think or believe.

    It’s a deep psychological problem he has that will never be cured by rational discussion.

    We best let him continue wetting his bed unabated. (sounds like….)

  85. #185
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:50 pm, Ota Benga said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:47 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    By gawd, I wish you were the leading GOP candidate, or that the party at least adopted your, ahem, views on their platform. That would be awesome! Take care. xo

  86. #186
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:53 pm, pdigaudio said:

    It’s ironic – when Gab Giffords was shot none of you were as alarmed or as upset.

    Giffords was shot by a leftwing kook. To borrow a phrase, an angry lone nut.

  87. #187
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:59 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:26 pm, Yashmak said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 1:01 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    It’s ironic – when Gab Giffords was shot none of you were as alarmed or as upset.

    Liar. Support this statement with evidence, or shut up.

    I clearly recall many here, in spite of ideological differences with Giffords, stating their condolences and condemning the perpetrator in the strongest possible terms.

    If you can prove otherwise, I challenge you to do so. If not, stop lying.

    It’s easy enough for all of us to go back and see what Michelle and her commenters said at the time.

    Horror: Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords shot at Tucson event, 4 5 dead; Update: Reports that Giffords still alive, in surgery; President Obama, Speaker Boehner, Palin, Brewer react; shooter ID’d as Jared Loughner

    By Michelle Malkin • January 8, 2011 02:31 PM

    “Ilovemycountry” is a liar.

    The title of that post began with “Horror”.
    The title of this post is “More ugly Occupy Oakland pictures that won’t make MSM front pages”

    Somehow “Ilovemycountry” thinks “Horror” is not “as alarmed or as upset” as “ugly”.

    I ask you again, “Ilovemycountry”:

    1) What is your country?
    2) What do you love about it?

  88. #188
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 3:59 pm, Flyoverman said:

    You’re no longer worth my attention. Moving on..

    You have a nice day.

  89. #189
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 4:11 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    Mob rule always leads to violence. There is no reason to assume that the OWS mob behavior will not lead to death as well as the theft, rape, muggings, and vandalism that has already occurred.

  90. #190
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 4:27 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:18 pm, AmericanGirl30 said:
    I have a feeling it would turn out rather like Lord of the Flies.

    ILMC = The Lord of the Flies

    The pig’s head that Jack impales on a stick as an offering to “The Beast.” The boys call the offering “The Lord of the Flies,” which in Judeo-Christian mythology refers to Beelzebub, an incarnation of Satan. In the novel, The Lord of the Flies functions totemically; it represents the savagery and amorality of Jack’s tribe.

  91. #191
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 4:27 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    What’s a miscreant?

    that’s the first time I’ve been called that.

    publiuswarmac9999 said:

    Mob rule always leads to violence. There is no reason to assume that the OWS mob behavior will not lead to death as well as the theft, rape, muggings, and vandalism that has already occurred.

    I think publiuswarmac9999 needs his/her meds.

    You folks must be be happy that you get to play phony outraged dingbats today.

    If not for these pictures – I’d be asking you about Herman Cain and if all of these accusations about him are the work of racist liberals?

    If that’s the case, why is Cain angry with Rick Perry – and does that mean Rick Perry and the rest of those Christian conservatives are the racists?

    Or are liberals still the racists?

  92. #192
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 4:31 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Do you have any comment on conservatives just making up stawman sh**, and attributing it to a leftest poster? If no, cool that. I think it’s lazy-minded and ignorant. If you’re gonna rant, just rant.

    So, was I supposed to find ‘nuance’ in that?

    If I’m the ‘jolly ol’ Falstaff’, then you’re Iago.

  93. #193
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 4:34 pm, CO_Engineer said:

    To Ota Benga and kentroyal5:
    I acknowledge your condemnation of the violence perpetrated by SOME of the OWS crowd- That’s an easy one to make. And I agree with the statement that they have a right to protest (as the Tea Party does as well)- also an easy call. My query is more basic, not whether you support the OWS right to protest, or the resulting violence, but DO YOU SUPPORT THE OWS MOVEMENT AND GOALS? Do you support their desire to punish the rich (those signs and chants that they peacefully participate in)? Do you believe in redistributing stuff from one group to another based on some ploitician’s definition of fairness? This is not an abstract discussion of political views that has no consequences, like in a college classroom. This is a question of where you stand. I’m not trying to provoke you, I’m really curious what your stand on this is.

  94. #194
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 4:41 pm, spaceycakes said:

    What’s a miscreant?

    that’s the first time I’ve been called that.

    I doubt that.

    But, here are some more you can add to your imaginary list:
    Liar
    Cretin
    Lowlife
    Oaf

  95. #195
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 4:48 pm, rplat said:

    The problems in this country are very simple to explain . . . it is run by a gaggle of amateurish, incompetent Marxists. Obama’s army is filling the streets of many major cities and his union soldiers are furthering his cause. Thanks enlightened voters you really stuck it to us this time. It could well be that this once great nation is on the steep slope of decline and ruin because of your blatant stupidity.

  96. #196
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 4:57 pm, kentroyals5 said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 4:34 pm, CO_Engineer said:
    To Ota Benga and kentroyal5:

    DO YOU SUPPORT THE OWS MOVEMENT AND GOALS? Do you support their desire to punish the rich (those signs and chants that they peacefully participate in)?

    I’ve previously said on this site that their demands are 100% unreasonable. I don’t support the movement. I’ve never supported the movement. There is no cohesive message that one can rally around other than ‘capitalism is bad.’ Which I disagree with.

    Do you believe in redistributing stuff from one group to another based on some ploitician’s definition of fairness?

    Not on a politician’s definition of fairness. Government collects taxes as a means to operate. Lord knows they waste gobbles of money. I have no issue with attempting to reign in wasteful spending.

    When it comes to taxes, I generally think it should be a progressive tax system. I don’t think someone who has $1,000 of discretionary income per year should face the same taxation level as someone with $50 million of discretionary income per year. Again, my two cents on the subject.

    Thanks for the civil question, CO-Engineer.

  97. #197
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 5:23 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Hey look – it’s spaceycakes and she’s talking trash.

    I waited for you.

  98. #198
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 5:33 pm, PD Dave said:

    On Purchase a relatively useless island somewhere, grant that island the legal status of independent nation, then give them a free one-way ticket.

    That’ll provide a good glimpse into how well they do under Communism.

    I vote for San Clemente Island off the coast of CA. It’s part of LA County (perfect) and is used for target practice by the US Navy.

  99. #199
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 5:34 pm, cbmi said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 5:23 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Hey look – it’s spaceycakes and she’s talking trash.

    I waited for you.

    I doubt that spaceycakes cares that a fifteen year old waited for her. It’s nice that you have free time. Is your homework all done? Is it not your night to help mom set the table? Oppps, sorry – mom and dad probably aren’t even home, are they?

  100. #200
    On November 3rd, 2011 at 5:50 pm, stillontheroad said:

    On November 3rd, 2011 at 2:45 pm, Ota Benga said:
    You and your ilk are really a piece of work — you march around the OWS outhouse singing praise but when it slops over you then complain of the stench? Who pays you to be here?

You must be logged in to post a comment.


JustOneMinute

» Barack, Youthful Leader!
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook