Document drop: What Scholastic is teaching your kids about the Occupiers

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 9, 2011 11:30 AM

Scholastic Inc. is a nearly century-old educational publishing company that distributes books, magazines, and other teaching materials through the schools.

If you have kids (or remember from your own grade-school days), Scholastic puts out news bulletins that get sent home weekly or monthly.

One of those items is Scholastic News, which bills itself as “America’s Leading News Source for kids.”

Reader Edward has a daughter in fourth grade who brought home the December issue of Scholastic News — and he wasn’t too happy when he saw the publication’s coverage of the Occupy Wall Street movement.

Read for yourself (click for full-size):

The news bulletin also included some quiz questions about OWS:

Talk about a whitewash. The Scholastic writers have great futures ahead as MSM writers.

Reader Edward wrote to Scholastic:

I grew up in Soviet Union and seeing your propaganda about Occupy Wall Street brings back my memories.

I do not remember seeing in any of your editions anything about Tea Party movement.

I’m neither Republican or Democrat but I would rather see my kids hear about both sides.

Scholastic responded:

Thank you for contacting Scholastic Book Clubs. I am happy to forward on your concern about providing both Democrat and Republican views. I apologize for any inconvenience you may have encountered while trying to offer different views for your children.

We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your concerns with us and I made sure that staff in our corporate headquarters will see your comments. Again, thank you.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at bookclubs@scholastic.com or toll-free at 1-800-SCHOLASTIC (800-724-6527). We are available Monday – Friday: 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Central Time, and on Saturday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

We truly appreciate your support of Scholastic Book Clubs.

Perhaps the next edition can provide kids with a full accounting of the Occupy-related illnesses, vandalism, rapes, deaths, and other criminal violations — and a related pop quiz on John Nolte’s Occupy arrest rap sheet.

The kids deserve the whole truth. The teachers unions’ Alinsky brigade won’t give it to them.

***

Mermaz tips me to this rather unbalanced piece on the Tea Party published by Scholastic last fall. Compare and contrast:

The Tea Party movement was founded in 2009 to advocate smaller government, lower taxes, and a smaller national debt. According to a CBS News poll, 18 per cent of Americans identify themselves as Tea Party supporters.

“The Tea Parties are filled with people who are average citizens,” Ross told the Scholastic Kids Press Corps. “We are the heart and soul of what the American spirit is.”

U.S. Senator Dan Inouye of Hawaii disagrees.

“I think they’re good Americans, but they go to the extreme,” he said. “They’re not covering the soul of America.”

Inouye is a former veteran and spoke to the Scholastic Kids Press Corps at a rally where the VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars) endorsed Senator Barbara Boxer for U.S. Senate in California.

…In Nevada, Sharron Angle, a Tea Party-backed Republican candidate, has become a real threat to U.S. Senator Harry Reid, who currently serves as the Senate Majority Leader. Reid called out the big guns to go up against his opponent. Former President Bill Clinton was recently in Nevada campaigning for him and warning voters against casting their ballots in anger.

“If any time in your life you make an important decision when you’re mad, there’s an 80 per cent chance you’re going to make a mistake,” Clinton said at a rally for Reid. “I don’t want people to abandon their anger. I want them to channel it so they can think clearly.”

***

A reader reminds me this isn’t the first time Scholastic has gone moonbatty:

Not the first time that Scholastic has whitewashed or succumbed to radical environmentalist (TreeHugger and Sierra Club) and liberal (Mother Jones, New York Times, Rethinking Schools, Campaign for a Commercial Free Childhood) pressure. Earlier in the year they succeeded in shaking down Scholastic and won another liberal propaganda campaign that seeks to dictate average Americans’ lives down to the kindergarten level simply because a curriculum was not up to the standards of the environmental Left.

The liberals claimed that providing children any information on coal is commercial indoctrination, worthy of an all out ideological war from nearly every single progressive group. However, the lesson packet also included general information on nuclear, hydroelectric power, wind, natural gas and solar energy.

Of course now, Scholastic simply wants to focus on promoting environmental awareness child activism based on the book The Down-to-Earth-Guide to Global Warming, which was written by Al Gore’s co-producer of ‘An Inconvenient Truth’, Laurie David.

Background here and here.

***

Related today: Occupying the Classroom: NYU to Offer Class in Occupy Wall Street

***
Previous:

“Educate, collaborate, AGITATE!”: Alinsky’s teacher corps
Flashback: Bill Ayers declares education “the motor-force of revolution”
Obama’s classroom campaign: No junior lobbyist left behind
Brainwashed in New Rochelle
Obama and Ayers Pushed Radicalism On Schools
A public school field trip…to the local illegal alien day labor center
First graders take school field trip…to teacher’s gay wedding
Roses are red. Bees are swarming. We’re all going to DIE from global warming!
Anti-war educators exploit The Children in the name of peace
The 3 R’s in the Age of Obama: Rappin’, revolution & radicalism
Get Schooled: Nickelodeon & friends want your kids to “change the system”
Nickelodeon goes moonbatty
Nickelodeon is at it again

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On December 10th, 2011 at 10:12 pm, Blackstone said:

    On December 9th, 2011 at 6:27 pm, Yashmak said:

    Not to mention it does not present the other side of the argument.

    – Truesoldier

    Sure it does.

    “Some people disagree with what the protestors are saying or doing. They say the message of Occupy Wall Street isn’t clear. They say the protestors haven’t offered any solutions to the problems or made any particular demands.”

    And also:

    “. . as the protests continue, mayors in some cities are worried about the strain on their cities’ resources. For example, extra Police officers and cleanup crews are needed to make sure the gatherings remain peaceful and orderly.”

    Again, not much detail there

    Exactly right there’s not much detail there. Now compare that to Michelle’s excerpt from their hit piece on the tea parties:

    U.S. Senator Dan Inouye of Hawaii disagrees.

    “I think they’re good Americans, but they go to the extreme,” he said. “They’re not covering the soul of America.”

    Inouye is a former veteran and spoke to the Scholastic Kids Press Corps at a rally where the VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars) endorsed Senator Barbara Boxer for U.S. Senate in California.

    …In Nevada, Sharron Angle, a Tea Party-backed Republican candidate, has become a real threat to U.S. Senator Harry Reid, who currently serves as the Senate Majority Leader. Reid called out the big guns to go up against his opponent. Former President Bill Clinton was recently in Nevada campaigning for him and warning voters against casting their ballots in anger.

    “If any time in your life you make an important decision when you’re mad, there’s an 80 per cent chance you’re going to make a mistake,” Clinton said at a rally for Reid. “I don’t want people to abandon their anger. I want them to channel it so they can think clearly.”

    Note also there’s no mention of the party affiliations of Inouye, Reid, Boxer, or Clinton, but they make sure you know that Sharron Angle was a “Tea Party-backed Republican candidate”.

  2. #102
    On December 11th, 2011 at 2:57 am, jt3151 said:

    It’s not that bad on its own but when compared to the Tea Party piece it shows a bias.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Subscribe to the Michelle Malkin newsletter

February 22, 2012 12:44 PM by Michelle Malkin

33 Comments

Surprise: UK’s Version of ‘Buffett Rule’ Failing to Bring in Expected Revenue

February 22, 2012 11:05 AM by Doug Powers

53 Comments

Pency-wise, pound foolish

The high priests of eco-destruction

February 22, 2012 07:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

124 Comments

Carney: Obama Didn’t Deny Keystone Permit

February 21, 2012 04:45 PM by Doug Powers

82 Comments

Republican politics killed the pipeline

Gallup: Unemployment Climbing Back to 9% for February

February 21, 2012 02:56 PM by Doug Powers

70 Comments

At least gas prices are dropping — wait, nevermind

Disability Claims Up As Unemployment Benefits Run Out

February 19, 2012 11:16 PM by Doug Powers

70 Comments

One of Obama’s Biggest Opponents in 2012

February 19, 2012 02:54 PM by Doug Powers

109 Comments

Gas pains

It Wouldn’t Be Saturday Morning Without Another Friday Night Solyndra Document Dump to Sift Through

February 18, 2012 09:52 AM by Doug Powers

41 Comments

Selective transparency under cover of weekend, part VI


Categories: Education,Moonbats,Politics,Tea Party

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook