Pelosi and Pickens sittin’ in a tree…

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 14, 2011 05:50 PM

I’ve written before about Cozy Nancy Pelosi and her financial stake in the eco-adventures of billionaire T. Boone Pickens.

See August 2008 – Nan and the Big Wind Boone-doggle.

Refresher:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called congressional Republicans who want up-or-down drilling votes “hand maidens of the oil companies.” Let’s call Pelosi what she is: House girl of the Big Wind boondogglers.

Though she seemingly backtracked on labeling drilling a “hoax” this week, Pelosi refuses to consider GOP energy proposals that don’t include massive government subsidies for eco-fantastical alternatives that have never panned out.

Which brings us to Madame Speaker’s 2007 financial disclosure form. Schedule III lists “assets and ‘unearned income’” of between $100,001-$250,000 from Clean Energy Fuels Corp. – Public Common Stock.” Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is a natural gas provider founded by T. Boone Pickens. Yep, that T. Boone Pickens– former oilman-turned-wind power evangelist whose ads touting a national wind campaign are now as ubiquitous as Viagra promos.

Pickens and Pelosi now share the same talking points downplaying the need to drill and open up more access to American oil. Instead, the Pickens pie-in-the-sky plan campaign proposes to completely replace natural gas with wind power in power generation and theoretically free up natural gas for America’s transportation needs.

All well and good in la-la land. But let’s be real about the limitations and costs of wind power. Past and ongoing experience has demonstrated the notorious unreliability of wind and the miserably low operating capacity of wind power facilities here and around the world. Depending on wind requires supplemental fossil fuel plants as back up to be turned on and off to compensate for wind power supply shortfalls– nullifying any reductions in carbon dioxide emissions (which are miniscule, according to the National Academy of Sciences).

Not to mention the thousands of sliced-up birds and other wildlife that have become wind power casualties (a problem that scientists say would be solved by “repowering” old turbines at a cost of untold billions).

Fittingly, the environmental mascot of the Democrat National Convention– the showcase of their alternative energy approach — is an eastern Colorado wind turbine propped up with Democrat carbon credit funds that has never produced any energy because of chronic equipment malfunctions.

But I digress.

Naturally, the Pickens Big Wind plan is proudly endorsed by Do-Nothing Pelosi’s friends at the obstructionist Sierra Club. Through another company, Mesa Power, Pickens has committed upwards of $12 billion in wind farms on the Texas panhandle. CEFC and Mesa Power are separate entities. But what benefits one piece of the Pickens puzzle benefits them all. The wind venture, as Pickens himself acknowledges, depends on permanent federal subsidies.

Pickens is banking on ‘em. And Pelosi’s banking on him.

As reported on #dontgomovement.com, Speaker Pelosi bought between $50,000 and $100,000 of stock in Pickens’ CLNE Corp. in May 2007 on the day of the initial public offering:

“She, and other investors, stand to gain a substantial return on their investment if gasoline prices stay high and municipal, state and even the Federal governments start using natural gas as their primary fuel source. If gasoline prices fall? Alternative fuels and the cost to convert fleets over to them becomes less and less attractive.”

CLNE also happens to be the sponsor of Proposition 10, a ballot initiative in Pelosi’s home state of California to dole out a combined $10 billion in state and federal funds for renewable energy incentives. Namely: Natural gas and wind.

Follow the money. Or, to put it in economist terms as energy analyst Kenneth Medlock III did in an interview with the Dallas Morning News about the Pickens multi-billion wind farm investment: “A lot of what he’s trying to do is add value to a stranded asset…he’s obviously got millions of dollars on the line.”

And so, potentially, does the Democrat Speaker of the House windily wagging her finger at the financial motivations of others.

Fast forward.

Today, Daniel Indiviglio at Reuters reports that a Pickens-backed bill is quietly making its way through Capitol Hill in the Christmas chaos.

Amid the flurry of legislation Congress is rushing to complete by year’s end is the New Alternative Transportation to Give Americans Solutions Act of 2011, or NATGAS Act. The proposal would, among other things, provide subsidies for driving vehicles powered by natural gas.

It’s a Pelosi legislative priority, but precious few are raising eyebrows about San Fran Nan’s conflict.

Where are the Big Biz/Big Government watchdogs when we need them?

Bueller? Bueller?

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On December 14th, 2011 at 6:06 pm, peteee said:

    hopefully the “r”‘s won’t be dumb enough to let that pass. but lately the “r”‘s seem beyond belief.

  2. #2
    On December 14th, 2011 at 6:17 pm, T-Bone said:

    T-Bone Pickens is the man. Someone who built a huge empire, lost it all and rebuilt it again. That is amazing in itself.

    Of course, he has seen the green boondoogle that made Al Gore and lots of other people, including climate scientists, rich and richer. He’s just doing his capitalist part in getting in on the money train. He is no fool. He also gave about $800 million to Oklahoma State University, almost half of which went to academics.

    So Pelosi is his benefactor and she herself invests in his success. She is no fool either. The fools are the ones that allow this eco ripoff time and time again.

  3. #3
    On December 14th, 2011 at 6:19 pm, Hiraghm said:

    Since the keystone pipeline has been tied in to the payroll tax cut bill, gasoline prices in my area have gone down 30 cents a gallon…

  4. #4
    On December 14th, 2011 at 6:25 pm, Paratus said:

    The Republicans, no doubt, have money in this project.Of course it will pass petee.

  5. #5
    On December 14th, 2011 at 6:35 pm, WaterBoyz said:

    We’ve all read and heard about the stories where the Ds snuck in something to their advantage.

    You would think that an R or a group of Rs would be combing ANYTHING that had any D fingerprints on it.

    When will the Rs get their head out of their ass and wake up to the fact that the Ds are ____________ (fill in the blank).

  6. #6
    On December 14th, 2011 at 6:43 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:

    precious few are raising eyebrows about San Fran Nan’s conflict.

    Drain the swamp.

  7. #7
    On December 14th, 2011 at 6:54 pm, RyanInSanJose said:

    Ah yes, more money for wind farms here in CA. I wonder how much it will cost just to replace the current turbines in the Altamont Pass wind farm?

    I say put them all in Nancy’s backyard.

  8. #8
    On December 14th, 2011 at 7:03 pm, docflash said:

    T Boone also owns the most water rights of anyone in the country,his new “oil”.Who in congress is in bed with him on this?If you can control the water you control everything.

  9. #9
    On December 14th, 2011 at 7:04 pm, thejim said:

    T Boone is a vast disappointment. His next book is Remaking the First Billion is the Toughest. It appears that far too many of the Celeb Billionaires & their crony government hacks are in on the rape and pillage of a great nation.

  10. #10
    On December 14th, 2011 at 7:11 pm, Hiraghm said:

    On December 14th, 2011 at 6:54 pm, RyanInSanJose said:

    Ah yes, more money for wind farms here in CA. I wonder how much it will cost just to replace the current turbines in the Altamont Pass wind farm?

    I say put them all in Nancy’s backyard.

    I say put it in Nancy’s office, if you want to really generate power from wind…

  11. #11
    On December 14th, 2011 at 7:34 pm, T-Bone said:

    Or maybe her bathroom?

  12. #12
    On December 14th, 2011 at 7:46 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Pickens is giving natgas a bad name. We are swimming in natgas in this county and it is an essential component in weaning ourselves from our dependency on foreign oil. We could be exporting lots of it and soon if the government would just get out of the way and allow the construction of LNG liquification facilities and necessary pipelines required.

    And there is no shortage of private capital willing to invest in this infrastructure either so large government subsidies are not necessary.

    Boone’s has repackaged his failed wind investment by attaching a natgas component to it to make it sound legitimate. But if it only works with big and permanent taxpayer support, what’s the point? Crony capitalism on parade.

  13. #13
    On December 14th, 2011 at 7:58 pm, T-Bone said:

    Funny thing is Boone is no crony with those guys. He is a republican using them as tools. He was one of the big contributor to the swift boat vets who torpedoed John Kerry.

    Now John “I was in Vietnam you know” Kerry is his buddy because they share alternative energy ideas. Kerry because he is a fool and Boone because he sees a way to make money.

    I think Boone does have a larger perspective of understandng that we have a foreign oil problem that needs fixing for national security but he buddys up with Pelosi and Kerry to pass laws that benefit his bottom line. Kinda like Ross Perot or Don Trump.

    When government picks winners and losers why not cozy up to the trough? Look at all those who did and the lifestyle they now lead. Clinton was broke when he left office. Look at him today. Rahm, Corzine, Cheney? Ok I had to throw that last one in for effect.

  14. #14
    On December 14th, 2011 at 8:15 pm, ACHefty said:

    Bueller? Bueller?

    Boehner? Boehner?

  15. #15
    On December 14th, 2011 at 8:26 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

    I don’t blame those who sieze the opportunities big govt affords. I blame the big govt statists that bring the wasteful “opportunities” into existance.

  16. #16
    On December 14th, 2011 at 8:37 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    On December 14th, 2011 at 8:26 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

    I don’t blame those who sieze the opportunities big govt affords. I blame the big govt statists that bring the wasteful “opportunities” into existance.

    These deals don’t just fall on one’s lap for free. You will always find that certain pols were accommodating an important crony campaign contributor or personal friend lobbying them for government handouts.

  17. #17
    On December 14th, 2011 at 8:52 pm, Hangfire said:

    Subsidies? You mean stealing from someone to give to another?

    Here in Hawaii, the state as well as the fed gives subsidies to green companies that will put solar panels on your roof for an average of $34,000 per home.

    The state and fed also offer tax credits to homeowners putting the panels on their roof.

    Now, HECO (Hawaiian Electric CO.) is saying that, due to the large number of people putting solar panels on their roof, the company is not making as much money, so…….

    ….they’re raising their rates.

    And, of course, raising the rates on electricity consumption will cause more homeowners to buy solar panels, which will cause the power company to lose more money, and raise their rates again.

    It never ends.

  18. #18
    On December 14th, 2011 at 9:05 pm, sbw999 said:

    Pelosi is the Tokyo Rose of our time; a traitor and hypocrite spewing out liberal/socialist propaganda on a daily basis. She is a character right out of an Orwell novel; a lying serpent slithering around the halls of Congress. Medusa in a pants suit.

  19. #19
    On December 14th, 2011 at 9:15 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    And what’s with her hair? Has she hired James Brolin’s barber?

  20. #20
    On December 14th, 2011 at 9:21 pm, rightisright said:

    this money and power game asks the same question as the chicken and the egg. Which came 1st, power or money, they both corrupt, look at congress…seems more congresscritters go to Washington middle income and leave filthy rich, not many leave as they arrived.

  21. #21
    On December 14th, 2011 at 9:24 pm, Long Haired Country Boy said:

    It’s a Pelosi legislative priority, but precious few are raising eyebrows about San Fran Nan’s conflict.

    Where are the Big Biz/Big Government watchdogs when we need them?

    Bueller? Bueller?

    Oh Michelle, you are HOT tonight!!!

  22. #22
    On December 14th, 2011 at 9:46 pm, Hangfire said:

    On December 14th, 2011 at 9:15 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    And what’s with her hair? Has she hired James Brolin’s barber?

    Close.

    Gary Busey’s.

  23. #23
    On December 14th, 2011 at 9:56 pm, bjc said:

    *You did great on Hannity tonight Michelle; It was obvious Sean is leaning towards Newt rather than, like you, willing to shine the light on all his deficiencies; Stay conservative gal, it’s just common sense!
    *Regarding Pelosi, or even Boehner for that matter, like I always say about politicians, “don’t trust, then verify why”; They will never, ever, ever let you down, as most of them are as dirty as the day is long; We need big changes in DC, and it’s going to take the common folk to do it!

  24. #24
    On December 14th, 2011 at 10:09 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    WOT but just watched Michelle on Hannity and I really have to tip my hat to you Michelle. You are one gutsy lady to stand up to the “anyone but Obama” pressure that you must be getting non-stop. You may be the last one left fighting the good fight.

    I don’t know if it is feasible considering the professional realities of your situation but are you really obliged to endorse anyone?

    Easy for me to say but should we end up with yet another lousy establishment liberal globalist as the GOP candidate, I am hoping that you and the very few other conservatives who haven’t yet caved will declare something like (ahem, mi-mi-mi-mi-mi):

    “I am very disappointed with this election cycle and cannot in good faith endorse anyone and don’t feel obligated to do so.

    We conservatives worked hard over the past several years on behalf of the GOP and tried very hard to work within the party in restoring a sense of commitment to specific principles, particularly conservative principles, and failed utterly.

    Now frustrated with a deep sense that we wasted our time fighting a determinedly entrenched party establishment that chose to war against us (remember Murkowksi e.g.?) rather than allow us into the process, many of us are now feeling betrayed and so demanding an explanation as to why conservatives should in the future try again to work within the Party. We sure don’t feel the love right now.

    I will not endorsement anyone nor I will not reveal who I will be voting for. I will not begrudge anyone who values my opinion for voting their conscience.

    Let’s try to do better next time.”

    Just something for your consideration. You can now bounce me out of here. I’ll never get that book autographed anyway.

  25. #25
    On December 14th, 2011 at 10:27 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Rush is knocking it out of the park on Greta tonight too. Man I am glad I watched Fox tonite. I almost never watch Greta but tonite is fantastic.

  26. #26
    On December 14th, 2011 at 10:27 pm, Flyoverman said:

    T. Boone Pickens = P.T. Barnum

  27. #27
    On December 14th, 2011 at 10:49 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    BTW, if you were watching Great, Rush mentioned the “Two if by Tea” video winners tonite, Colony Bay. These are the CA Tea Party people who put out the movies “Courage NH” in which I have been an extra in the first two episodes.

    That is not New Hampshire in the background but Jim Riley’s farm in Tehachapi CA.

  28. #28
    On December 14th, 2011 at 10:50 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Greta, not Great

  29. #29
    On December 14th, 2011 at 10:52 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Here is the link to Rush’s site where the winning videos are available for viewing.

  30. #30
    On December 15th, 2011 at 12:08 am, backwoods conservative said:

    Of course this isn’t getting any attention. Everybody knows the real evils in the world are Dick Cheney and Haliburton. Anything else is small potatoes by comparison.

  31. #31
    On December 15th, 2011 at 12:29 am, backwoods conservative said:

    On December 14th, 2011 at 10:50 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Greta, not Great

    I’m sure she wouldn’t mind if you referred to her as the Great Van Susteren.

  32. #32
    On December 15th, 2011 at 4:42 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Here is what Nancy Pelosi promised in order to become Speaker of the House…

    Hope, faith, and optimism have always defined the American spirit. Never before have those qualities been more urgently needed. With that sense of urgency and in keeping with our optimistic American spirit, Democrats are advancing a New Direction for America. We believe America should work for everyone – not just the privileged few – by building opportunity and prosperity for all and guaranteeing real security. That was the vision of our Founding Fathers; that is our vision for the future. We know that Americans can work together to meet the serious challenges facing our country, create a stronger nation, and build a safer and freer world.

    Over the past decade, the Republican majority in Congress has taken our nation in the wrong direction. Too many Americans are paying a heavy price for those wrong choices: record costs for energy, health care and education; jobs shipped overseas; and budgets that heap record debt on our children. For millions, the middle-class dream has been replaced by a middle-class squeeze. In spite of lessons learned by 9/11 and Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, independent experts tell us Americans are still not as safe as we should be, and America’s leadership around the world has eroded.

    Democrats are proposing a New Direction for America – to reassert our role as a respected international leader. Our New Direction advances national security priorities that are tough and smart, a military second to none, and a firm commitment to building diplomatic alliances to defeat terrorism, promote freedom, alleviate poverty, and stop global warming.

    The New Direction for America advances the right priorities – to make our nation safer and our economy fairer; to make health care and college more affordable; to energize America with energy independence; and to guarantee a dignified retirement for all Americans. These initiatives – the product of a united Democratic House Caucus working together with our Senate colleagues – are our priorities for the 109th Congress. We are committed to building an America where all families can live and prosper in diverse, safe, and vibrant communities.

    With integrity, civility and fiscal discipline, our New Direction for America will use commonsense principles to address the aspirations and fulfill the hopes and dreams of all Americans. That is our promise to the American people.

    Nancy Pelosi
    House Democratic Leader

  33. #33
    On December 15th, 2011 at 4:53 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Unemployment rate in December 2006,
    just before Nancy Pelosi took power as Speaker of the House: 4.4%

    Unemployment rate in December 2010,
    after four years of Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House: 9.4%

    Source: US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Unemployment more than doubled under Pelosi’s watch.

    Five years ago, in December 2006, Republicans controlled the House, Senate, and Presidency.

    Since then Democrats have controlled a majority (2+ out of 3) of the House, Senate, and Presidency.

    Everything Pelosi complained about and promised to improve is now far WORSE five years later.

    In November 2010, voters voted for CHANGE,
    and that is why Nancy Pelosi is no longer Speaker of the House.

    Let’s keep up that change and take back the Presidency and the Senate in 2012.

  34. #34
    On December 15th, 2011 at 7:34 am, Mister P said:

    Every time a Republican hears a Democrat talk about the Bush recession, he needs to correct him (or her) and recast the recession as a PELOSI/REID recession. When the two of them took charge in 2007, the economy was humming along just fine. In one year they managed to tip it into a recession and crash the economy in 2008. Bush may have been a lame duck, but they were the evil twins who set the plate for Obama and his socialist solutions which always meant BIG Government and Power to Democrats.

  35. #35
    On December 15th, 2011 at 7:41 am, Mister P said:

    WOT but just watched Michelle on Hannity and I really have to tip my hat to you Michelle. You are one gutsy lady to stand up to the “anyone but Obama” pressure that you must be getting non-stop. You may be the last one left fighting the good fight.

    That may be true, but she left me with the impression that she likes nobody. She can’t just sit on the fence and dis every candidate that comes forward. I will only respect her opinion on this subject when she selects someone and then takes the slings and arrows that comes with supporting a candidate.
    Hannity had a point, and MM missed it completely. Many of us are just tired of the circular firing squad. Its one candidate after another getting attacked.
    Many of us now are so turned off by the attacks, that they just fuel us to like that candidate more.
    I can reach my own conclusions about Mitt or Newt or Michelle B. I don’t need MM for the opinions, I only need her for the facts.

  36. #36
    On December 15th, 2011 at 8:32 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    More from Pelosi in 2006, when she was trying to become Speaker:

    This culture of corruption is an affront to the idea of a representative democracy, and its consequences are devastating…

    Democrats declare that it is time to end the culture of corruption prevailing through all levels of government. We are committed to immediate change to lead this country in a new direction, to put an end to business as usual, and to make certain this nation’s leaders serve the people’s interests, not special interests. Our responsibility to our constituents and to our nation is to represent all of the people, not just the powerful.

    Our goal is to restore accountability, honesty and openness at all levels of government. To do so, we will create and enforce rules that demand the highest ethics from every public servant, sever unethical ties between lawmakers and lobbyists, and establish clear standards that prevent the trading of official business for gifts.

    Honest leadership is not a partisan goal…

    - From the “HONEST LEADERSHIP AND OPEN GOVERNMENT” section of A NEW DIRECTION FOR AMERICA

  37. #37
    On December 15th, 2011 at 8:36 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On December 15th, 2011 at 7:34 am, Mister P said:

    Every time a Republican hears a Democrat talk about the Bush recession, he needs to correct him (or her) and recast the recession as a PELOSI/REID recession. When the two of them took charge in 2007, the economy was humming along just fine. In one year they managed to tip it into a recession and crash the economy in 2008. Bush may have been a lame duck, but they were the evil twins who set the plate for Obama and his socialist solutions which always meant BIG Government and Power to Democrats.

    Exactly. Bush wrongly gets blame for what was done by a Democrat Congress in 2007 & 2008.

    And Clinton wrongly gets credit for what was accomplished by a Republican Congress in 1995-2000.

  38. #38
    On December 15th, 2011 at 8:38 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    The last time Republicans controlled a majority (2+ out of 3) of the House, Senate, and Presidency was December 2006.

    Unemployment was at 4.4%.

    And the national debt was under $8.7 Trillion.

    Look what 5 years of Democrat control have done to unemployment and the national debt.

  39. #39
    On December 15th, 2011 at 8:47 am, happyscrapper said:

    I’d like to take Pelosi’s mouth and turn it into some giant green wind tunnel, harness it and make a huge profit. It could work! She isn’t worth a plug nickel as she is now.

  40. #40
    On December 15th, 2011 at 8:50 am, happyscrapper said:

    Off topic…I just heard this on the radio…soundbites.

    In 2002, Mitt Romney said his views are “progressive”. Then in 2007, he said he wasn’t a Republican, he was a moderate. And having all Republicans in power would be a bad idea!

    Fast forward to 2011. He is now a total conservative!

    Spit.

  41. #41
    On December 15th, 2011 at 8:52 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    Look what 5 years of Democrat control have done to unemployment and the national debt.

    And it won’t get fixed overnight. It will take decades. Fortunately, with Allen West, Paul Ryan, Marco Rubio and others, the GOP has a deep bench. We just have to be smart about our plays and batting lineup.

  42. #42
    On December 15th, 2011 at 9:04 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    Pelosi and Pickens sittin’ in a tree…

    …S-C-A-M-M-I-N-G

  43. #43
    On December 15th, 2011 at 9:14 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On December 15, 2011 at 09:04 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    Pelosi and Pickens sittin’ in a tree…

    …S-C-A-M-M-I-N-G

    S C R E W I N G, not each other, but us.

  44. #44
    On December 15th, 2011 at 9:19 am, Misscheryl said:

    The love of money is the root of all evil and these two are proof of that.

  45. #45
    On December 15th, 2011 at 9:33 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On December 15th, 2011 at 9:19 am, Misscheryl said:

    The love of money is the root of all evil.

    I know our Bibles say that, but Pelosi’s Bible says something completely different. On Earth Day, Nancy Pelosi falsely claimed:

    The Bible tells us in the Old Testament, “To minister to the needs of God’s creation is an act of worship. To ignore those needs is to dishonor the God who made us.” On this Earth Day, and every day, let us honor the earth and our future generations with a commitment to fight climate change.

    If Pelosi will lie about what the Bible says, she’ll lie about anything!

  46. #46
    On December 15th, 2011 at 9:38 am, Misscheryl said:

    ITTRP said: The Bible tells us in the Old Testament, “To minister to the needs of God’s creation is an act of worship. To ignore those needs is to dishonor the God who made us.” On this Earth Day, and every day, let us honor the earth and our future generations with a commitment to fight climate change.

    Not only is she morally bankrupt, she’s coocoo – truly.

  47. #47
    On December 15th, 2011 at 10:47 am, swede said:

    Not only is she morally bankrupt, she’s coocoo – truly.

    And more than a little creepy.

  48. #48
    On December 15th, 2011 at 11:19 am, Marshall_Will said:

    Mister P said:

    I will only respect her opinion on this subject when she selects someone and then takes the slings and arrows that comes with supporting a candidate.

    What’s your hurry!? Not even to Iowa yet. Like it or not, Michelle’s endorsement and ‘opinion’ matters. It matters a LOT. Just as Obama could never have carried the election without DUPING Mooderates & InDepends, without a Tea Party/Conservative Seal of Approval, meet uphill!

    Late hour endorsements can really energize a campaign and put it over the top. Keep yer’ powder DRY matey! I love Sean, but last night he sounded like a teetery Sales Manager rallying the ‘troops’ at the bar on Friday after a rough week.

    We ALL want this nightmare to end. We ALL want this to be over. But what exactly is it that MM should be so impressed by? There’s time, let’s get this right.

  49. #49
    On December 15th, 2011 at 11:29 am, hawkeye54 said:

    Not only is she morally bankrupt, she’s coocoo – truly.
    And more than a little creepy.

    She’s just creepy. Period.

  50. #50
    On December 15th, 2011 at 11:30 am, letget said:

    I would be hard pressed to decide who is the biggest snake(slimy and forked tongue), dingy or nan? Both make me sick!
    L

  51. #51
    On December 15th, 2011 at 11:46 am, RedDog said:

    “She, and other investors, stand to gain a substantial return on their investment if gasoline prices stay high and municipal, state and even the Federal governments start using natural gas as their primary fuel source…..”

    Ah, the game is afoot. Let’s see her at the next press conference podium blinking like a cat in a sandstorm when questioned about it. Who wants to bet that it all blows over and she skates?

  52. #52
    On December 15th, 2011 at 12:14 pm, T-Bone said:

    Who wants to bet no one will ask her?

  53. #53
    On December 15th, 2011 at 1:19 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    t’s a Pelosi legislative priority, but precious few are raising eyebrows about San Fran Nan’s conflict.

    Michelle, you’re not suggesting that politicians shouldn’t be enriching themselves rather than doing the people’s business are you?

  54. #54
    On December 15th, 2011 at 1:24 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    He also gave about $800 million to Oklahoma State University, almost half of which went to academics.

    Really – half to academics? That seems like a waste at a University, why wasn’t it all spent on sports?

  55. #55
    On December 15th, 2011 at 1:25 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Hangfire said:

    On December 14th, 2011 at 9:15 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    And what’s with her hair? Has she hired James Brolin’s barber?

    Close.

    Gary Busey’s.

    I thought James Brolin’s barber was Barbra Streisand’s gardener.

  56. #56
    On December 15th, 2011 at 1:44 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    If she’s doing it, you can bet a lot of them are doing it (both repubs and dems). When they are not thinking about getting re-elected, they are thinking about getting rich. Throw them all out.

  57. #57
    On December 15th, 2011 at 1:45 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    No…Barbra Streisand’s chef is Brolin’s cousin, who is Pelousy’s step-brother.

  58. #58
    On December 15th, 2011 at 2:07 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    I would be hard pressed to decide who is the biggest snake(slimy and forked tongue), dingy or nan?

    As far as I’m concerned, both are equal in slime and lies.

  59. #59
    On December 15th, 2011 at 2:16 pm, redgypsy said:

    “I can reach my own conclusions about Mitt or Newt or Michelle B. I don’t need MM for the opinions, I only need her for the facts.” MisterP at 7:41am
    Then why do you come here? Last I checked, this is an opinion blog…

  60. #60
    On December 15th, 2011 at 3:11 pm, Paratus said:

    Mister P #35: Don’t come to this opinion blog. Find somewhere else to get your facts. It’s freakin easy to do. Don’t hit MM’s site.
    Had to say it too redgypsy.

  61. #61
    On December 15th, 2011 at 3:40 pm, PD Dave said:

    Boehner? Boehner?

    Good one ACH, what happened to this guy? Could we have a speaker that really stands up to the Dems and Obama? This go along-get along attitude never works…they will stab you in the back every time!

  62. #62
    On December 15th, 2011 at 4:41 pm, Collateral Damage said:

    Natural gas and wind, sounds like business-as-usual in Washington DC.

  63. #63
    On December 15th, 2011 at 5:34 pm, Hangfire said:

    On December 15th, 2011 at 1:45 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    I thought James Brolin’s barber was Barbra Streisand’s gardener.

    No…Barbra Streisand’s chef is Brolin’s cousin, who is Pelousy’s step-brother.

    Programs. Get yer pro-grammmmmmmms. Only 5 dollars!”

  64. #64
    On December 15th, 2011 at 10:18 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Hangfire @63. What? What? I didn’t make myself perfectly clear? Heh.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


JustOneMinute

» Barack, Youthful Leader!
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook