See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #201
   On January 6th, 2012 at 1:43 pm, happyscrapper said:

   On January 6th, 2012 at 12:42 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:
   On January 6th, 2012 at 12:18 pm, happyscrapper said:

   Happy, I can’t find it. All I find is Glen Beck endorses Ron Paul links. Please find me a link if you can, thanks

   RC…I can’t find a link! This is really strange because I would have thought this would be all over the place. Did I hear him wrong? Possibly. But I was sure he said something like, “I WAS a huge Ron Paul fan, but after the interview with him, blood was shooting out of my eyes”. Then he talked about Ron Paul’s anti-Israel stance, which as you know, would really rankle Beck.

   I am still trying to find a link, but maybe it is just too soon to be on yet. If I heard wrong, I will apologize.

2. #202
   On January 6th, 2012 at 1:53 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

   Ron Paul will allow in the near future, in the name of isolationism, an Iron Triangle of Iran-backed Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela, with enough firepower to intimidate/dominate Latin America, with nuclear weapons pointed at us, just in case we try to help our friends and allies. How’s that for a nightmare scenario?

   It is possible under Obama. He doesn’t have the wits Kennedy did. I just hope Cuban reforms continue.

3. #203
   On January 6th, 2012 at 2:00 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

   We have been voting for the lesser of two evils ever since Reagan. We have had Bush 1, Bush 2, Dole, Mc Cain and now probably Romney. Its because we have been willing to vote this way the GOP keeps rolling out “moderates”. Voting for the lesser of two evils has just continued this losing tactic. Look for Jeb Bush to be the GOP 2016 candidate and the trend will continue and all of us are the losers.

   I think El Rushbo said it best:

   The reason why the republicans do this is that they have paid political consultants who tell them that they have to appeal to moderates and independents and the only way to do that is to be anything but a wholesome conservative.
   I think the Democrats and the liberal media want Romney because some, not all but some seem to have given up on Obama.

   What they may be trying to do is focus their attention on maybe getting a few house seats back, mitigating their losses in the Senate, say keeping the republicans at 55 or less, and with Romney in office, they might be able to drag him to the left if they can win over an impatient modern electorate that is completely clueless as to what our founding values are in 2014, sufficiently tee-off the more conservative independents and moderates and have someone like hilary run and win in 2016.

4. #204
   On January 6th, 2012 at 2:10 pm, happyscrapper said:

   and have someone like hilary run and win in 2016.

   That old bag wouldn’t have a chance against a Marco Rubio!! Picture it! Not a chance!!

5. #205
   On January 6th, 2012 at 3:00 pm, LiveFreeOrDie_2011 said:

   On January 6th, 2012 at 1:03 pm, Dexter Alarius said: How do you define ‘principles’?

   Dex, with all due respect what I see here is someone trying come to grips with the strong possibility of having to vote for Romney. Romney is a wolf date – you convince yourself that he looks good as a candidate only to wake up the next morning with an ugly liberal.

   Frankly, I don’t trust Romney. Yeah Reagan changed his positions on abortion and the role of government and nobody questions that because he was a champion for life and did what he could do to reduce government. I don’t see that in Romney. In fact, it was Romney who went on his little listening tour after Obie was elected chiding us how we have to forget Reagan and become a more tolerant party. Now he’s wrapping himself in Reagan flag. That’s what I mean by no principles and a wolf date.

6. #206
   On January 6th, 2012 at 3:26 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

   On January 6th, 2012 at 1:40 pm, conservative hispanic said:
   Rogue Cheddar:

   There it is. You’ve been a Paulbot for 4 years. Like Dexter Alarius said, you’re noseholders, only for far longer than the rest of us.

   Oh, is this your first time voting? Try not to screw it up!

7. #207
   On January 6th, 2012 at 5:18 pm, love2rumba said:

   ’ve never once talked about your ol’ lady

   Maybe you weer talking about yours Okie_Donkie?

8. #208
   On January 6th, 2012 at 5:48 pm, OK_Loyalist said:

   On January 6th, 2012 at 5:18 pm, love2dildotherear said:

   I weer not!

9. #209
   On January 6th, 2012 at 6:26 pm, StaceyOfLiberty said:

   On January 6th, 2012 at 1:18 pm, corkie said:
   Oh, so you AGREE that people often fear things that they DO understand, right??
   That’s exactly my point. Thanks for the help.

   The fact that people often fear things they understand doesn’t disprove RC’s statement at all, though.